Arden Investment Series Trust, et al.; Notice of Application, 63255-63261 [2013-24770]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 205 / Wednesday, October 23, 2013 / Notices
requirements and it implemented
compliance testing procedures prior to
the date of the Contribution. Applicant
further represents that at no time did
any employees of Applicant other than
the Contributor have any knowledge
that the Contribution had been made
prior to discovery by the Applicant in
November 2011. After learning of the
Contribution, Applicant and the
Contributor obtained the Official’s
agreement to return the Contribution,
which was subsequently returned, and
the Applicant set up an escrow account
for all fees charged to the Clients’
capital accounts in the Fund for the
two-year period beginning May 22,
2011.
8. Applicant states that the
Contributor’s apparent intent in making
the Contribution was not to influence
the selection or retention of Applicant.
Applicant represents that the amount of
the Contribution, profile of the
candidate and characteristics of the
campaign are consistent with the
pattern of the Contributor’s other
substantial political donations.
Applicant notes that the Contributor
failed to appreciate that contributions to
federal candidates who held state or
local office could trigger the prohibition
on compensation under Rule 206(4)–5
or that such contributions were subject
to the Applicant’s Pay-to-Play Policies
and Procedures. Applicant represents
that the Contributor had no contact with
any representative of the Clients (or
their boards) outside of making limited
substantive presentations to the Clients’
representatives and consultants about
the investment strategy he manages and
that the Applicant took steps designed
to limit such contact during the
duration of the two-year time out on
compensation.
By the Commission.
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–24771 Filed 10–22–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. IC–30745; File No. 812–14152]
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Arden Investment Series Trust, et al.;
Notice of Application
15(a) and 15(b) of the 1940 Act and
Rules 6e–2(b)(15) and 6e–3(T)(b)(15)
thereunder.
Arden Investment Series
Trust (the ‘‘Trust’’) and Arden Asset
Management LLC (‘‘Arden’’)
(collectively, the ‘‘Applicants’’).
SUMMARY OF APPLICATION: Applicants
request an order granting exemptions
from the provisions of Sections 9(a),
13(a), 15(a), and 15(b) of the Act and
Rules 6e–2(b)(15) and 6e–3(T)(b)(15)
thereunder in cases where a life
insurance company separate account
supporting variable life insurance
contracts (‘‘VLI Accounts’’) holds shares
of Arden Variable Alternative Strategies
Fund, an existing portfolio of the Trust
(the ‘‘Existing Variable Fund’’), or a
‘‘Future Variable Fund,’’ 1 (any Existing
Variable Fund or Future Variable Fund
is referred to herein as a ‘‘Fund,’’ and
collectively, the ‘‘Funds’’), and one or
more of the following other types of
investors also hold shares of the Funds:
(i) Any life insurance company separate
account supporting variable annuity
contracts (‘‘VA Accounts’’); (ii) any VLI
Account; (iii) trustees of qualified group
pension or group retirement plans
(‘‘Plans’’ or ‘‘Qualified Plans’’) outside
the separate account context; (iv) the
investment adviser or any subadviser to
a Fund or affiliated persons of the
adviser or subadviser (representing seed
money investments in the Fund)
(‘‘Advisers’’); and (v) any general
account of an insurance company
depositor of VA Accounts and/or VLI
Accounts and affiliated persons of such
insurance company (‘‘General
Accounts’’).
FILING DATE: The application was filed
on May 2, 2013, and amended and
restated on October 2, 2013.
HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING: An
order granting the application will be
issued unless the Commission orders a
hearing. Interested persons may request
a hearing by writing to the Secretary of
the Commission and serving Applicants
with a copy of the request, personally or
by mail. Hearing requests should be
received by the Commission by 5:30
p.m. on November 11, 2013, and should
be accompanied by proof of service on
Applicants, in the form of an affidavit
or, for lawyers, a certificate of service.
Hearing requests should state the nature
APPLICANTS:
October 17, 2013.
Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’).
ACTION: Notice of application pursuant
to Section 6(c) of the Investment
Company Act of 1940, as amended (the
‘‘1940 Act’’ or ‘‘Act’’), seeking
exemptions from Sections 9(a), 13(a),
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:13 Oct 22, 2013
Jkt 232001
1 As used herein, a Future Variable Fund is any
investment company (or investment portfolio or
series thereof), other than the Existing Variable
Fund, designed to be sold to VA Accounts and/or
VLI Accounts and to which Applicants or their
affiliates may in the future serve as investment
advisers, investment subadvisers, investment
managers, administrators, principal underwriters or
sponsors.
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
63255
of the writer’s interest, the reason for the
request, and the issues contested.
Persons may request notification of a
hearing by writing to the Secretary of
the Commission.
ADDRESSES: Secretary, Securities and
Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
Applicants, 375 Park Avenue, 32nd
Floor, New York, NY 10152.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sonny Oh, Senior Counsel, or Joyce M.
Pickholz, Branch Chief, Insured
Investments Office, Division of
Investment Management at (202) 551–
6795.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
following is a summary of the
application. The complete application
may be obtained via the Commission’s
Web site by searching for the file
number, or for an applicant using the
Company name box, at https://
www.sec.gov/search.htm, or by calling
(202) 551–8090.
Applicants’ Representations
1. The Trust was organized as a
Delaware statutory trust on April 11,
2012 and is registered under the Act as
an open-end management investment
company (Reg. File No. 811–22701). The
Trust is a series investment company as
defined by Rule 18f–2 under the Act
and the Existing Variable Fund is a
series of the Trust. The Trust has
registered two classes of shares of the
Existing Variable Fund under the
Securities Act of 1933 (the ‘‘1933 Act’’)
(Reg. File No. 333–180881) on Form N–
1A. The Trust may in the future
establish additional Funds and
additional classes of shares for any of
the Funds. Shares of the Funds will not
be offered to the general public. The
existing series of the Trust are the
Existing Variable Fund, Arden
Alternative Strategies Fund and Arden
Alternative Strategies II. This
Application seeks exemptive relief only
for the Existing Variable Fund and any
Future Variable Fund of the Trust as
defined herein but does not seek
exemptive relief for the Arden
Alternative Strategies Fund or Arden
Alternative Strategies II because they are
not designed to be sold to VA Accounts
and/or VLI Accounts.
2. Arden serves as the investment
adviser to the Trust and the Existing
Variable Fund. Arden is a Delaware
limited liability company and is
registered as an investment adviser
under the Investment Advisers Act of
1940, as amended. Subject to the
authority of the Board of Trustees of the
Trust, Arden is responsible for the
overall management of the business
E:\FR\FM\23OCN1.SGM
23OCN1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
63256
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 205 / Wednesday, October 23, 2013 / Notices
affairs of the Trust and oversees the
investment operations of the Existing
Variable Fund, including the purchase,
retention and disposition of securities in
accordance with the Fund’s investment
objective.
3. The Existing Variable Fund
proposes, and Future Variable Funds
will propose, to offer their shares to VLI
and VA Accounts of various life
insurance companies (‘‘Participating
Insurance Companies’’) to serve as
investment media to support variable
life insurance contracts and variable
annuity contracts (together, ‘‘Variable
Contracts’’) issued through such
accounts. Each VLI Account and VA
Account is or will be established as a
segregated asset account by a
Participating Insurance Company
pursuant to the insurance law of the
insurance company’s state of domicile.
As such, the assets of each will be the
property of the Participating Insurance
Company, and that portion of the assets
of such an Account equal to the reserves
and other contract liabilities with
respect to the Account will not be
chargeable with liabilities arising out of
any other business that the insurance
company may conduct. The income,
gains and losses, realized or unrealized
from such an Account’s assets will be
credited to or charged against the
Account without regard to other
income, gains or losses of the
Participating Insurance Company. If a
VLI Account or VA Account is
registered as an investment company, it
will be a ‘‘separate account’’ as defined
by Rule 0–1(e) (or any successor rule)
under the Act and will be registered as
a unit investment trust. For purposes of
the Act, the Participating Insurance
Company that establishes such a
registered VLI Account or VA Account
is the depositor and sponsor of the
Account as those terms have been
interpreted by the Commission with
respect to variable life insurance and
variable annuity separate accounts.
4. There are currently no Participating
Insurance Companies.
5. The Funds will sell their shares to
VLI and VA Accounts only if each
Participating Insurance Company
sponsoring such a VLI or VA Account
enters into a participation agreement
with the Funds. The participation
agreements define or will define the
relationship between each Fund and
each Participating Insurance Company
and memorialize or will memorialize,
among other matters, the fact that,
except where the agreement specifically
provides otherwise, the Participating
Insurance Company will remain
responsible for establishing and
maintaining any VLI or VA Account
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:13 Oct 22, 2013
Jkt 232001
covered by the agreement and for
complying with all applicable
requirements of state and federal law
pertaining to such accounts and to the
sale and distribution of Variable
Contracts issued through such
Accounts. The role of the Funds under
this arrangement, with regard to the
federal securities laws, will consist of
offering and selling shares of the Funds
to the separate accounts and fulfilling
any conditions that the Commission
may impose in granting the requested
order.
6. The use of a common management
investment company (or investment
portfolio thereof) as an investment
medium for both VLI Accounts and VA
Accounts of the same Participating
Insurance Company, or of two or more
insurance companies that are affiliated
persons of each other, is referred to
herein as ‘‘mixed funding.’’ The use of
a common management investment
company (or investment portfolio
thereof) as an investment medium for
VLI Accounts and/or VA Accounts of
two or more Participating Insurance
Companies that are not affiliated
persons of each other is referred to
herein as ‘‘shared funding.’’
7. Applicants propose that the
Existing Variable Fund and any Future
Variable Funds may offer their shares
directly to Qualified Plans, the Fund’s
Advisers, and a General Account of any
Participating Insurance Companies.
8. The use of a common management
investment company (or investment
portfolio thereof) as an investment
medium for VLI Accounts, VA
Accounts, Qualified Plans, Advisers and
General Accounts is referred to herein
as ‘‘extended mixed funding.’’
Applicants’ Legal Analysis
1. Section 9(a) of the 1940 Act makes
it unlawful for any company to serve as
an investment adviser or principal
underwriter of any investment
company, including a unit investment
trust, if an affiliated person of that
company is subject to disqualification
enumerated in Section 9(a)(1) or (2) of
the Act. Sections 13(a), 15(a), and 15(b)
of the 1940 Act have been deemed by
the Commission to require ‘‘passthrough’’ voting with respect to an
underlying investment company’s
shares.
2. Rules 6e–2(b)(15) and 6e–
3(T)(b)(15) under the Act provide partial
exemptions from Sections 9(a), 13(a),
15(a), and 15(b) of the Act to VLI
Accounts supporting certain VLI
Contracts and to their life insurance
company depositors under limited
circumstances, as described in the
application. VLI Accounts, their
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
depositors and their principal
underwriters may not rely on the
exemptions provided by Rules 6e–
2(b)(15) and 6e–3(T)(b)(15) if shares of
the Fund are held by a VLI Account
through which certain VLI Contracts are
issued, a VLI Account of an unaffiliated
Participating Insurance Company, an
unaffiliated Adviser, any VA Account, a
Qualified Plan or a General Account.
Accordingly, Applicants request an
order of the Commission granting
exemptions from Sections 9(a), 13(a),
15(a), and 15(b) of the Act and Rules 6e–
2(b)(15) and 6e–3(T)(b)(15) thereunder
in cases where certain VLI Account hold
shares of the Funds and one or more of
the following types of investors also
hold shares of the Funds: (i) VA
Accounts and VLI Accounts (supporting
scheduled premium or flexible premium
VLI Contracts) of affiliated and
unaffiliated Participating Insurance
Companies; (ii) Qualified Plans; (iii)
Advisers; and/or (iv) General Accounts.
3. Applicants maintain that there is
no policy reason for the sale of Fund
shares to Qualified Plans, Advisers or
General Accounts to prohibit or
otherwise limit a Participating
Insurance Company from relying on the
relief provided by Rules 6e–2(b)(15) and
6e–3(T)(b)(15). Nonetheless, Rule 6e–2
and Rule 6e–3(T) each specifically
provides that the relief granted
thereunder is available only where
shares of the underlying fund are
offered exclusively to insurance
company separate accounts. In this
regard, Applicants request exemptive
relief to the extent necessary to permit
shares of the Funds to be sold to
Qualified Plans, Advisers and General
Accounts while allowing Participating
Insurance Companies and their VA
Accounts and VLI Accounts to enjoy the
benefits of the relief granted under Rule
6e–2(b)(15) and Rule 6e–3(T)(b)(15).
Applicants note that if the Funds were
to sell their shares only to Qualified
Plans, exemptive relief under Rule 6e–
2 and Rule 6e–3(T) would not be
necessary. The relief provided for under
Rule 6e–2(b)(15) and Rule 6e–
3(T)(b)(15) does not relate to Qualified
Plans, Advisers or General Accounts or
to a registered investment company’s
ability to sell its shares to such
purchasers.
4. Applicants are not aware of any
reason for excluding separate accounts
and investment companies engaged in
shared funding from the exemptive
relief provided under Rules 6e–2(b)(15)
and 6e–3(T)(b)(15), or for excluding
separate accounts and investment
companies engaged in mixed funding
from the exemptive relief provided
under Rule 6e–2(b)(15). Similarly,
E:\FR\FM\23OCN1.SGM
23OCN1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 205 / Wednesday, October 23, 2013 / Notices
Applicants are not aware of any reason
for excluding Participating Insurance
Companies from the exemptive relief
requested because the Funds may also
sell their shares to Qualified Plans,
Advisers and General Accounts. Rather,
Applicants submit that the proposed
sale of shares of the Funds to these
purchasers may allow for the
development of larger pools of assets
resulting in the potential for greater
investment and diversification
opportunities, and for decreased
expenses at higher asset levels resulting
in greater cost efficiencies.
5. For the reasons explained below,
Applicants have concluded that
investment by Qualified Plans, Advisers
and General Accounts in the Funds
should not increase the risk of material
irreconcilable conflicts between owners
of VLI Contracts and other types of
investors or between owners of VLI
Contracts issued by unaffiliated
Participating Insurance Companies.
6. Consistent with the Commission’s
authority under Section 6(c) of the Act
to grant exemptive orders to a class or
classes of persons and transactions,
Applicants request exemptions for a
class consisting of Participating
Insurance Companies and their separate
accounts investing in the Existing
Variable Fund and Future Variable
Funds, as well as their principal
underwriters, that currently invest or in
the future will invest in the Funds.
7. Section 6(c) of the Act provides, in
part, that the Commission, by order
upon application, may conditionally or
unconditionally exempt any person,
security or transaction, or any class or
classes of persons, securities or
transactions, from any provision or
provisions of the Act, or any rule or
regulation thereunder, if and to the
extent that such exemption is necessary
or appropriate in the public interest and
consistent with the protection of
investors and the purposes fairly
intended by the policy and provisions of
the Act. The Applicants submit that the
exemptions requested are appropriate in
the public interest and consistent with
the protection of investors and the
purposes fairly intended by the policy
and provisions of the Act.
8. Section 9(a)(3) of the Act provides,
among other things, that it is unlawful
for any company to serve as investment
adviser or principal underwriter of any
registered open-end investment
company if an affiliated person of that
company is subject to a disqualification
enumerated in Sections 9(a)(1) or (2).
Rules 6e–2(b)(15)(i) and (ii) and Rules
6e–3(T)(b)(15)(i) and (ii) under the Act
provide exemptions from Section 9(a)
under certain circumstances, subject to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:13 Oct 22, 2013
Jkt 232001
the limitations discussed above on
mixed funding, extended mixed funding
and shared funding. These exemptions
limit the application of the eligibility
restrictions to affiliated individuals or
companies that directly participate in
management of the underlying
investment company.
9. Rules 6e–2(b)(15)(iii) and 6e–
3(T)(b)(15)(iii) under the Act provide
exemptions from pass-through voting
requirements with respect to several
significant matters, assuming the
limitations on mixed funding, extended
mixed funding and shared funding are
observed. Rules 6e–2(b)(15)(iii)(A) and
6e–3(T)(b)(15)(iii)(A) provide that the
insurance company may disregard the
voting instructions of its variable life
insurance contract owners with respect
to the investments of an underlying
investment company, or any contract
between such an investment company
and its investment adviser, when
required to do so by an insurance
regulatory authority (subject to the
provisions of paragraphs (b)(5)(i) and
(b)(7)(ii)(A) of Rules 6e–2 and 6e–3(T)).
10. The Applicants represent that the
sale of Fund shares to Qualified Plans,
Advisers or General Accounts will not
have any impact on the exemptions
requested herein regarding the disregard
of pass-through voting rights. Shares
sold to Qualified Plans will be held by
such Plans. The exercise of voting rights
by Plans, whether by trustees,
participants, beneficiaries, or
investment managers engaged by the
Plans, does not raise the type of issues
respecting disregard of voting rights that
are raised by VLI Accounts. With
respect to Plans, which are not
registered as investment companies
under the Act, there is no requirement
to pass through voting rights to Plan
participants. Indeed, to the contrary,
applicable law expressly reserves voting
rights associated with Plan assets to
certain specified persons as disclosed in
the application.
11. Similarly, Advisers and General
Accounts are not subject to any passthrough voting rights. Accordingly,
unlike the circumstances surrounding
VLI Account and VA Account
investments in shares of the Funds, the
issue of the resolution of any material
irreconcilable conflicts with respect to
voting is not present with respect to
Advisers or General Accounts of
Participating Insurance Companies.
12. Applicants recognize that the
prohibitions on mixed and shared
funding might reflect concern regarding
possible different investment
motivations among investors. When
Rule 6e–2 was first adopted, variable
annuity separate accounts could invest
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
63257
in mutual funds whose shares were also
offered to the general public. However,
now, under the tax code any underlying
fund, including the Funds, that sells
shares to VA Accounts or VLI Accounts,
would, in effect, be precluded from also
selling its shares to the public.
Consequently, the Funds may not sell
their shares to the public.
13. Applicants assert that the rights of
an insurance company on its own
initiative or on instructions from a state
insurance regulator to disregard the
voting instructions of owners of
Variable Contracts is not inconsistent
with either mixed funding or shared
funding. Applicants state that The
National Association of Insurance
Commissioners Variable Life Insurance
Model Regulation (the ‘‘NAIC Model
Regulation’’) suggests that it is unlikely
that insurance regulators would find an
underlying fund’s investment policy,
investment adviser or principal
underwriter objectionable for one type
of Variable Contract but not another
type.
14. Applicants assert that shared
funding by unaffiliated insurance
companies does not present any issues
that do not already exist where a single
insurance company is licensed to do
business in several or all states. A
particular state insurance regulator
could require action that is inconsistent
with the requirements of other states in
which the insurance company offers its
contracts. However, the fact that
different insurers may be domiciled in
different states does not create a
significantly different or enlarged
problem. Shared funding by unaffiliated
insurers, in this respect, is no different
than the use of the same investment
company as the funding vehicle for
affiliated insurers, which Rules 6e–
2(b)(15) and 6e–3(T)(b)(15) permit.
Affiliated insurers may be domiciled in
different states and be subject to
differing state law requirements.
Affiliation does not reduce the
potential, if any exists, for differences in
state regulatory requirements. In any
event, the conditions set forth below are
designed to safeguard against, and
provide procedures for resolving, any
adverse effects that differences among
state regulatory requirements may
produce. If a particular state insurance
regulator’s decision conflicts with the
majority of other state regulators, then
the affected Participating Insurance
Company will be required to withdraw
its separate account investments in the
relevant Fund. This requirement will be
provided for in the participation
agreement that will be entered into by
Participating Insurance Companies with
the relevant Fund.
E:\FR\FM\23OCN1.SGM
23OCN1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
63258
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 205 / Wednesday, October 23, 2013 / Notices
15. Rules 6e–2(b)(15) and 6e–
3(T)(b)(15) give Participating Insurance
Companies the right to disregard the
voting instructions of VLI Contract
owners in certain circumstances. This
right derives from the authority of state
insurance regulators over VLI Accounts
and VA Accounts. Under Rules 6e–
2(b)(15) and 6e–3(T)(b)(15), a
Participating Insurance Company may
disregard VLI Contract owner voting
instructions only with respect to certain
specified items. Affiliation does not
eliminate the potential, if any exists, for
divergent judgments as to the
advisability or legality of a change in
investment policies, principal
underwriter or investment adviser
initiated by such Contract owners. The
potential for disagreement is limited by
the requirements in Rules 6e–2 and 6e–
3(T) that the Participating Insurance
Company’s disregard of voting
instructions be reasonable and based on
specific good faith determinations.
16. A particular Participating
Insurance Company’s disregard of
voting instructions, nevertheless, could
conflict with the voting instructions of
a majority of VLI Contract owners. The
Participating Insurance Company’s
action possibly could be different than
the determination of all or some of the
other Participating Insurance
Companies (including affiliated
insurers) that the voting instructions of
VLI Contract owners should prevail, and
either could preclude a majority vote
approving the change or could represent
a minority view. If the Participating
Insurance Company’s judgment
represents a minority position or would
preclude a majority vote, then the
Participating Insurance Company may
be required, at the relevant Fund’s
election, to withdraw its VLI Accounts’
and VA Accounts’ investments in the
relevant Fund. No charge or penalty will
be imposed as a result of such
withdrawal. This requirement will be
provided for in the participation
agreement entered into by the
Participating Insurance Companies with
the relevant Fund.
17. Applicants assert that there is no
reason why the investment policies of a
Fund would or should be materially
different from what these policies
would or should be if the Fund
supported only VA Accounts or VLI
Accounts, whether flexible premium or
scheduled premium VLI Contracts. Each
type of insurance contract is designed as
a long-term investment program.
18. Each Fund will be managed to
attempt to achieve its specified
investment objective, and not favor or
disfavor any particular Participating
Insurance Company or type of insurance
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:13 Oct 22, 2013
Jkt 232001
contract. There is no reason to believe
that different features of various types of
Variable Contracts will lead to different
investment policies for each or for
different VLI Accounts and VA
Accounts. The sale of Variable Contracts
and ultimate success of all VA Accounts
and VLI Accounts depends, at least in
part, on satisfactory investment
performance, which provides an
incentive for each Participating
Insurance Company to seek optimal
investment performance.
19. Furthermore, no single investment
strategy can be identified as appropriate
to a particular Variable Contract. Each
‘‘pool’’ of VLI Contract and VA Contract
owners is composed of individuals of
diverse financial status, age, insurance
needs and investment goals. A Fund
supporting even one type of Variable
Contract must accommodate these
diverse factors in order to attract and
retain purchasers. Permitting mixed and
shared funding will provide economic
support for the continuation of the
Funds. Mixed and shared funding will
broaden the base of potential Variable
Contract owner investors, which may
facilitate the establishment of additional
Funds serving diverse goals.
20. Applicants do not believe that the
sale of the shares to Plans, Advisers or
General Accounts will increase the
potential for material irreconcilable
conflicts of interest between or among
different types of investors. In
particular, Applicants see very little
potential for such conflicts beyond
those that would otherwise exist
between owners of VLI Contracts and
VA Contracts. Applicants submit that
either there are no conflicts of interest
or that there exists the ability by the
affected parties to resolve such conflicts
consistent with the best interests of VLI
Contract owners, VA Contract owners
and Plan participants.
21. Applicants considered whether
there are any issues raised under the
Code, Treasury Regulations, or Revenue
Rulings thereunder, if Qualified Plans,
VA Accounts, VLI Accounts, Advisers
and General Accounts all invest in the
same Fund. Applicants have concluded
that neither the Code, nor the Treasury
Regulations nor Revenue Rulings
thereunder present any inherent
conflicts of interest if Qualified Plans,
VA Accounts, VLI Accounts, Advisers
and General Accounts all invest in the
same Fund.
22. Applicants note that, while there
are differences in the manner in which
distributions from separate accounts
and Qualified Plans are taxed, these
differences have no impact on the
Funds. When distributions are to be
made, and a separate account or Plan is
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
unable to net purchase payments to
make distributions, the separate account
or Plan will redeem shares of the
relevant Fund at its net asset values in
conformity with Rule 22c–1 under the
Act (without the imposition of any sales
charge) to provide proceeds to meet
distribution needs. A Participating
Insurance Company will then make
distributions in accordance with the
terms of its Variable Contracts, and a
Plan will then make distributions in
accordance with the terms of the Plan.
23. Applicants considered whether it
is possible to provide an equitable
means of giving voting rights to Variable
Contract owners, Plans, Advisers and
General Accounts. In connection with
any meeting of Fund shareholders, the
Fund will inform each Participating
Insurance Company (with respect to its
separate accounts and general account),
Adviser, and Qualified Plan of its share
holdings and provide other information
necessary for such shareholders to
participate in the meeting (e.g., proxy
materials). Each Participating Insurance
Company then will solicit voting
instructions from owners of VLI
Contracts and VA Contracts in
accordance with Rules 6e–2 or 6e–3(T),
or Section 12(d)(1)(E)(iii)(aa) of the Act,
as applicable, and its participation
agreement with the relevant Fund.
Shares of a Fund that are held by an
Adviser or a General Account will
generally be in the same proportion as
all votes cast on behalf of all Variable
Contract owners having voting rights.
However, an Adviser or General
Account will vote its shares in such
other manner as may be required by the
Commission or its staff. Shares held by
Plans will be voted in accordance with
applicable law. The voting rights
provided to Plans with respect to the
shares would be no different from the
voting rights that are provided to Plans
with respect to shares of mutual funds
sold to the general public. Furthermore,
if a material irreconcilable conflict
arises because of a Plan’s decision to
disregard Plan participant voting
instructions, if applicable, and that
decision represents a minority position
or would preclude a majority vote, the
Plan may be required, at the election of
the relevant Fund, to withdraw its
investment in the Fund, and no charge
or penalty will be imposed as a result
of such withdrawal.
24. Applicants do not believe that the
ability of a Fund to sell its shares to a
Qualified Plan, Adviser or General
Account gives rise to a senior security
as defined by Section 18(g) of the Act.
Regardless of the rights and benefits of
participants under Plans or owners of
Variable Contracts, VLI Accounts, VA
E:\FR\FM\23OCN1.SGM
23OCN1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 205 / Wednesday, October 23, 2013 / Notices
Accounts, Qualified Plans, Advisers and
General Accounts only have, or will
only have, rights with respect to their
respective shares of a Fund. These
parties can only redeem such shares at
net asset value. No shareholder of a
class of the Fund has any preference
over any other shareholder of the class
with respect to distribution of assets or
payment of dividends.
25. Applicants do not believe that the
veto power of state insurance
commissioners over certain potential
changes to Fund investment objectives
approved by Variable Contract owners
creates conflicts between the interests of
such owners and the interests of Plan
participants, Advisers or General
Accounts. Applicants note that a basic
premise of corporate democracy and
shareholder voting is that not all
shareholders may agree with a
particular proposal. Their interests and
opinions may differ, but this does not
mean that inherent conflicts of interest
exist between or among such
shareholders or that occasional conflicts
of interest that do occur between or
among them are likely to be
irreconcilable.
26. Although Participating Insurance
Companies may have to overcome
regulatory impediments in redeeming
shares of a Fund held by their separate
accounts, Applicants state that the Plans
and participants in participant-directed
Plans can make decisions quickly and
redeem their shares in a Fund and
reinvest in another investment company
or other funding vehicle without
impediments, or as is the case with most
Plans, hold cash pending suitable
investment. As a result, conflicts
between the interests of Variable
Contract owners and the interests of
Plans and Plan participants can usually
be resolved quickly since the Plans can,
on their own, redeem their Fund shares.
Advisers and General Accounts can
similarly redeem their shares of a Fund
and make alternative investments at any
time.
27. Finally, Applicants considered
whether there is a potential for future
conflicts of interest between
Participating Insurance Companies and
Qualified Plans created by future
changes in the tax laws. Applicants do
not see any greater potential for material
irreconcilable conflicts arising between
the interests of Variable Contract owners
and Plan participants from future
changes in the federal tax laws than that
which already exists between VLI
Contract owners and VA Contract
owners.
28. Applicants recognize that the
foregoing is not an all-inclusive list, but
rather is representative of issues that
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:13 Oct 22, 2013
Jkt 232001
they believe are relevant to this
Application. Applicants believe that the
sale of Fund shares to Qualified Plans
would not increase the risk of material
irreconcilable conflicts between the
interests of Plan participants and
Variable Contract owners or other
investors. Further, Applicants submit
that the use of the Funds with respect
to Plans is not substantially dissimilar
from each Fund’s current and
anticipated use, in that Plans, like
separate accounts, are generally longterm investors.
29. Applicants assert that permitting a
Fund to sell its shares to an Adviser or
to the General Account of a
Participating Insurance Company for the
purpose of obtaining see money will
enhance management of each Fund
without raising significant concerns
regarding material irreconcilable
conflicts among different types of
investors.
30. Various factors have limited the
number of insurance companies that
offer Variable Contracts. These factors
include the costs of organizing and
operating a funding vehicle, certain
insurers’ lack of experience with respect
to investment management, and the lack
of name recognition by the public of
certain insurance companies as
investment experts. In particular, some
smaller life insurance companies may
not find it economically feasible, or
within their investment or
administrative expertise, to enter the
Variable Contract business on their own.
Use of the Funds as a common
investment vehicle for Variable
Contracts would reduce or eliminate
these concerns. Mixed and shared
funding should also provide several
benefits to owners of Variable Contracts
by eliminating a significant portion of
the costs of establishing and
administering separate underlying
funds.
31. Applicants state that the
Participating Insurance Companies will
benefit not only from the investment
and administrative expertise of the
Funds’ Adviser, but also from the
potential cost efficiencies and
investment flexibility afforded by larger
pools of funds. Therefore, making the
Funds available for mixed and shared
funding will encourage more insurance
companies to offer Variable Contracts.
This should result in increased
competition with respect to both
Variable Contract design and pricing,
which can in turn be expected to result
in more product variety. Applicants also
assert that sale of shares in a Fund to
Qualified Plans, in addition to VLI
Accounts and VA Accounts, will result
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
63259
in an increased amount of assets
available for investment in a Fund.
32. Applicants also submit that,
regardless of the type of shareholder in
a Fund, an Adviser is or would be
contractually and otherwise obligated to
manage the Fund solely and exclusively
in accordance with the Fund’s
investment objectives, policies and
restrictions, as well as any guidelines
established by the Fund’s Board of
Trustees (the ‘‘Board’’).
33. Applicants assert that sales of
Fund shares, as described above, will
not have any adverse federal income tax
consequences to other investors in such
a Fund.
34. In addition, Applicants assert that
granting the exemptions requested
herein is in the public interest and, as
discussed above, will not compromise
the regulatory purposes of Sections 9(a),
13(a), 15(a), or 15(b) of the Act or Rules
6e–2 or 6e–3(T) thereunder.
Applicants’ Conditions
Applicants agree that the Commission
order requested herein shall be subject
to the following conditions:
1. A majority of the Board of each
Fund will consist of persons who are
not ‘‘interested persons’’ of the Fund, as
defined by Section 2(a)(19) of the Act,
and the rules thereunder, and as
modified by any applicable orders of the
Commission, except that if this
condition is not met by reason of death,
disqualification or bona fide resignation
of any trustee or trustees, then the
operation of this condition will be
suspended: (a) For a period of 90 days
if the vacancy or vacancies may be filled
by the Board; (b) for a period of 150
days if a vote of shareholders is required
to fill the vacancy or vacancies; or (c) for
such longer period as the Commission
may prescribe by order upon
application, or by future rule.
2. The Board will monitor a Fund for
the existence of any material
irreconcilable conflict between and
among the interests of the owners of all
VLI Contracts and VA Contracts and
participants of all Plans investing in the
Fund, and determine what action, if
any, should be taken in response to such
conflicts. A material irreconcilable
conflict may arise for a variety of
reasons, including: (a) An action by any
state insurance regulatory authority; (b)
a change in applicable federal or state
insurance, tax, or securities laws or
regulations, or a public ruling, private
letter ruling, no-action or interpretive
letter, or any similar action by
insurance, tax or securities regulatory
authorities; (c) an administrative or
judicial decision in any relevant
proceeding; (d) the manner in which the
E:\FR\FM\23OCN1.SGM
23OCN1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
63260
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 205 / Wednesday, October 23, 2013 / Notices
investments of the Fund are being
managed; (e) a difference in voting
instructions given by VA Contract
owners, VLI Contract owners, and Plans
or Plan participants; (f) a decision by a
Participating Insurance Company to
disregard the voting instructions of
contract owners; or (g) if applicable, a
decision by a Plan to disregard the
voting instructions of Plan participants.
3. Participating Insurance Companies
(on their own behalf, as well as by
virtue of any investment of General
Account assets in a Fund), the Advisers,
and any Plan that executes a
participation agreement upon its
becoming an owner of 10% or more of
the assets of a Fund (collectively,
‘‘Participants’’) will report any potential
or existing conflicts to the Board. Each
Participant will be responsible for
assisting the Board in carrying out the
Board’s responsibilities under these
conditions by providing the Board with
all information reasonably necessary for
the Board to consider any issues raised.
This responsibility includes, but is not
limited to, an obligation by each
Participating Insurance Company to
inform the Board whenever Variable
Contract owner voting instructions are
disregarded, and, if pass-through voting
is applicable, an obligation by each
trustee for a Plan to inform the Board
whenever it has determined to disregard
Plan participant voting instructions. The
responsibility to report such
information and conflicts, and to assist
the Board, will be a contractual
obligation of all Participating Insurance
Companies under their participation
agreement with a Fund, and these
responsibilities will be carried out with
a view only to the interests of the
Variable Contract owners. The
responsibility to report such
information and conflicts, and to assist
the Board, also will be contractual
obligations of all Plans under their
participation agreement with a Fund,
and such agreements will provide that
these responsibilities will be carried out
with a view only to the interests of Plan
participants.
4. If it is determined by a majority of
the Board, or a majority of the
disinterested trustees of the Board, that
a material irreconcilable conflict exists,
then the relevant Participant will, at its
expense and to the extent reasonably
practicable (as determined by a majority
of the disinterested trustees), take
whatever steps are necessary to remedy
or eliminate the material irreconcilable
conflict, up to and including: (a)
Withdrawing the assets allocable to
some or all of their VLI Accounts or VA
Accounts from the Fund and reinvesting
such assets in a different investment
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:13 Oct 22, 2013
Jkt 232001
vehicle, including another Fund; (b) in
the case of a Participating Insurance
Company, submitting the question as to
whether such segregation should be
implemented to a vote of all affected
Variable Contract owners and, as
appropriate, segregating the assets of
any appropriate group (i.e., VA Contract
owners or VLI Contact owners of one or
more Participating Insurance
Companies) that votes in favor of such
segregation, or offering to the affected
Contract owners the option of making
such a change; (c) withdrawing the
assets allocable to some or all of the
Plans from the affected Fund and
reinvesting them in a different
investment medium; and (d)
establishing a new registered
management investment company or
managed separate account. If a material
irreconcilable conflict arises because of
a decision by a Participating Insurance
Company to disregard Variable Contract
owner voting instructions, and that
decision represents a minority position
or would preclude a majority vote, then
the Participating Insurance Company
may be required, at the election of the
Fund, to withdraw such Participating
Insurance Company’s VLI Account and
VA Account investments in the Fund,
and no charge or penalty will be
imposed as a result of such withdrawal.
If a material irreconcilable conflict
arises because of a Plan’s decision to
disregard Plan participant voting
instructions, if applicable, and that
decision represents a minority position
or would preclude a majority vote, the
Plan may be required, at the election of
the Fund, to withdraw its investment in
the Fund, and no charge or penalty will
be imposed as a result of such
withdrawal. The responsibility to take
remedial action in the event of a Board
determination of a material
irreconcilable conflict and to bear the
cost of such remedial action will be a
contractual obligation of all Participants
under their participation agreement
with a Fund, and these responsibilities
will be carried out with a view only to
the interests of Variable Contract owners
or, as applicable, Plan participants.
For purposes of this Condition 4, a
majority of the disinterested trustees of
the Board of a Fund will determine
whether or not any proposed action
adequately remedies any material
irreconcilable conflict, but, in no event,
will the Fund or its investment adviser
be required to establish a new funding
vehicle for any Variable Contract or
Plan. No Participating Insurance
Company will be required by this
Condition 4 to establish a new funding
vehicle for any Variable Contract if any
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
offer to do so has been declined by vote
of a majority of the Contract owners
materially and adversely affected by the
material irreconcilable conflict. Further,
no Plan will be required by this
Condition 4 to establish a new funding
vehicle for the Plan if: (a) A majority of
the Plan participants materially and
adversely affected by the irreconcilable
material conflict vote to decline such
offer, or (b) pursuant to documents
governing the Plan, the Plan trustee
makes such decision without a Plan
participant vote.
5. The determination by the Board of
the existence of a material irreconcilable
conflict and its implications will be
made known in writing promptly to all
Participants.
6. Participating Insurance Companies
will provide pass-through voting
privileges to all Variable Contract
owners whose Contracts are issued
through registered VLI Accounts or
registered VA Accounts for as long as
the Commission continues to interpret
the Act as requiring such pass-through
voting privileges. However, as to
Variable Contracts issued through VA
Accounts or VLI Accounts not registered
as investment companies under the Act,
pass-through voting privileges will be
extended to owners of such Contracts to
the extent granted by the Participating
Insurance Company. Accordingly, such
Participating Insurance Companies,
where applicable, will vote the shares of
each Fund held in their VLI Accounts
and VA Accounts in a manner
consistent with voting instructions
timely received from Variable Contract
owners. Participating Insurance
Companies will be responsible for
assuring that each of their VLI and VA
Accounts investing in a Fund calculates
voting privileges in a manner consistent
with all other Participating Insurance
Companies investing in that Fund.
The obligation to calculate voting
privileges as provided in this
Application shall be a contractual
obligation of all Participating Insurance
Companies under their participation
agreement with the Fund. Each
Participating Insurance Company will
vote shares of each Fund held in its VLI
or VA Accounts for which no timely
voting instructions are received, as well
as shares held in its General Account or
otherwise attributed to it, in the same
proportion as those shares for which
voting instructions are received. Each
Plan will vote as required by applicable
law, governing Plan documents and as
provided in this Application.
7. As long as the Commission
continues to interpret the Act as
requiring that pass-through voting
privileges be provided to Variable
E:\FR\FM\23OCN1.SGM
23OCN1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 205 / Wednesday, October 23, 2013 / Notices
Contract owners, a Fund Adviser or any
General Account will vote its respective
shares of the Fund in the same
proportion as all votes cast on behalf of
all Variable Contract owners having
voting rights; provided, however, that
such an Adviser or General Account
shall vote its shares in such other
manner as may be required by the
Commission or its staff.
8. Each Fund will comply with all
provisions of the Act requiring voting by
shareholders (which, for these purposes,
shall be the persons having a voting
interest in its shares), and, in particular,
the Fund will either provide for annual
meetings (except to the extent that the
Commission may interpret Section 16 of
the Act not to require such meetings) or
comply with Section 16(c) of the Act
(although each Fund is not, or will not
be, one of those trusts of the type
described in Section 16(c) of the Act), as
well as with Section 16(a) of the Act
and, if and when applicable, Section
16(b) of the Act. Further, each Fund will
act in accordance with the
Commission’s interpretations of the
requirements of Section 16(a) with
respect to periodic elections of trustees
and with whatever rules the
Commission may promulgate
thereunder.
9. A Fund will make its shares
available to the VLI Accounts, VA
Accounts, and Plans at or about the time
it accepts any seed capital from its
Adviser or from the General Account of
a Participating Insurance Company.
10. Each Fund has notified, or will
notify, all Participants that disclosure
regarding potential risks of mixed and
shared funding may be appropriate in
VLI Account and VA Account
prospectuses or Plan documents. Each
Fund will disclose, in its prospectus
that: (a) Shares of the Fund may be
offered to both VA Accounts and VLI
Accounts and, if applicable, to Plans; (b)
due to differences in tax treatment and
other considerations, the interests of
various Variable Contract owners
participating in the Fund and the
interests of Plan participants investing
in the Fund, if applicable, may conflict;
and (c) the Fund’s Board will monitor
events in order to identify the existence
of any material irreconcilable conflicts
and to determine what action, if any,
should be taken in response to any such
conflicts.
11. If and to the extent Rule 6e–2 and
Rule 6e–3(T) under the Act are
amended, or proposed Rule 6e–3 under
the Act is adopted, to provide
exemptive relief from any provision of
the Act, or the rules thereunder, with
respect to mixed or shared funding, on
terms and conditions materially
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:13 Oct 22, 2013
Jkt 232001
different from any exemptions granted
in the order requested in this
Application, then each Fund and/or
Participating Insurance Companies, as
appropriate, shall take such steps as
may be necessary to comply with Rules
6e–2 or 6e–3(T), as amended, or Rule
6e–3, to the extent such rules are
applicable.
12. Each Participant, at least annually,
shall submit to the Board of each Fund
such reports, materials or data as the
Board reasonably may request so that
the trustees may fully carry out the
obligations imposed upon the Board by
the conditions contained in this
Application. Such reports, materials and
data shall be submitted more frequently
if deemed appropriate by the Board. The
obligations of the Participants to
provide these reports, materials and
data to the Board, when it so reasonably
requests, shall be a contractual
obligation of all Participants under their
participation agreement with the Fund.
13. All reports of potential or existing
conflicts received by a Board, and all
Board action with regard to determining
the existence of a conflict, notifying
Participants of a conflict and
determining whether any proposed
action adequately remedies a conflict,
will be properly recorded in the minutes
of the Board or other appropriate
records, and such minutes or other
records shall be made available to the
Commission upon request.
14. Each Fund will not accept a
purchase order from a Qualified Plan if
such purchase would make the Plan an
owner of 10 percent or more of the
assets of the Fund unless the Plan
executes an agreement with the Fund
governing participation in the Fund that
includes the conditions set forth herein
to the extent applicable. A Plan will
execute an application containing an
acknowledgement of this condition at
the time of its initial purchase of shares.
Conclusion
Applicants submit, for all of the
reasons explained above, that the
exemptions requested are appropriate in
the public interest and consistent with
the protection of investors and the
purposes fairly intended by the policy
and provisions of the Act.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Investment Management, pursuant to
delegated authority.
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–24770 Filed 10–22–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
63261
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–70703; File No. SR–
NYSEArca–2013–102]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change Amending the NYSE Arca
Options Fee Schedule Relating to
Market Maker and Lead Market Maker
Transaction Credits
October 17, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that, on October
7, 2013, NYSE Arca, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘NYSE Arca’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the selfregulatory organization. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of the Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the
NYSE Arca Options Fee Schedule (‘‘Fee
Schedule’’) to conform references to
certain Market Maker and Lead Market
Maker (‘‘LMM’’) transaction credits to
the transaction credits implemented in
a recent fee change. The Exchange
proposes to implement the fee change
immediately. The text of the proposed
rule change is available on the
Exchange’s Web site at www.nyse.com,
at the principal office of the Exchange,
and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
1 15
U.S.C.78s(b)(1).
U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
2 15
E:\FR\FM\23OCN1.SGM
23OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 205 (Wednesday, October 23, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63255-63261]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-24770]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. IC-30745; File No. 812-14152]
Arden Investment Series Trust, et al.; Notice of Application
October 17, 2013.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'').
ACTION: Notice of application pursuant to Section 6(c) of the
Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the ``1940 Act'' or
``Act''), seeking exemptions from Sections 9(a), 13(a), 15(a) and 15(b)
of the 1940 Act and Rules 6e-2(b)(15) and 6e-3(T)(b)(15) thereunder.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicants: Arden Investment Series Trust (the ``Trust'') and Arden
Asset Management LLC (``Arden'') (collectively, the ``Applicants'').
Summary of Application: Applicants request an order granting exemptions
from the provisions of Sections 9(a), 13(a), 15(a), and 15(b) of the
Act and Rules 6e-2(b)(15) and 6e-3(T)(b)(15) thereunder in cases where
a life insurance company separate account supporting variable life
insurance contracts (``VLI Accounts'') holds shares of Arden Variable
Alternative Strategies Fund, an existing portfolio of the Trust (the
``Existing Variable Fund''), or a ``Future Variable Fund,'' \1\ (any
Existing Variable Fund or Future Variable Fund is referred to herein as
a ``Fund,'' and collectively, the ``Funds''), and one or more of the
following other types of investors also hold shares of the Funds: (i)
Any life insurance company separate account supporting variable annuity
contracts (``VA Accounts''); (ii) any VLI Account; (iii) trustees of
qualified group pension or group retirement plans (``Plans'' or
``Qualified Plans'') outside the separate account context; (iv) the
investment adviser or any subadviser to a Fund or affiliated persons of
the adviser or subadviser (representing seed money investments in the
Fund) (``Advisers''); and (v) any general account of an insurance
company depositor of VA Accounts and/or VLI Accounts and affiliated
persons of such insurance company (``General Accounts'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ As used herein, a Future Variable Fund is any investment
company (or investment portfolio or series thereof), other than the
Existing Variable Fund, designed to be sold to VA Accounts and/or
VLI Accounts and to which Applicants or their affiliates may in the
future serve as investment advisers, investment subadvisers,
investment managers, administrators, principal underwriters or
sponsors.
Filing Date: The application was filed on May 2, 2013, and amended and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
restated on October 2, 2013.
Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An order granting the application
will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing. Interested
persons may request a hearing by writing to the Secretary of the
Commission and serving Applicants with a copy of the request,
personally or by mail. Hearing requests should be received by the
Commission by 5:30 p.m. on November 11, 2013, and should be accompanied
by proof of service on Applicants, in the form of an affidavit or, for
lawyers, a certificate of service. Hearing requests should state the
nature of the writer's interest, the reason for the request, and the
issues contested. Persons may request notification of a hearing by
writing to the Secretary of the Commission.
ADDRESSES: Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street
NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090. Applicants, 375 Park Avenue, 32nd
Floor, New York, NY 10152.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sonny Oh, Senior Counsel, or Joyce M.
Pickholz, Branch Chief, Insured Investments Office, Division of
Investment Management at (202) 551-6795.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the
application. The complete application may be obtained via the
Commission's Web site by searching for the file number, or for an
applicant using the Company name box, at https://www.sec.gov/search.htm,
or by calling (202) 551-8090.
Applicants' Representations
1. The Trust was organized as a Delaware statutory trust on April
11, 2012 and is registered under the Act as an open-end management
investment company (Reg. File No. 811-22701). The Trust is a series
investment company as defined by Rule 18f-2 under the Act and the
Existing Variable Fund is a series of the Trust. The Trust has
registered two classes of shares of the Existing Variable Fund under
the Securities Act of 1933 (the ``1933 Act'') (Reg. File No. 333-
180881) on Form N-1A. The Trust may in the future establish additional
Funds and additional classes of shares for any of the Funds. Shares of
the Funds will not be offered to the general public. The existing
series of the Trust are the Existing Variable Fund, Arden Alternative
Strategies Fund and Arden Alternative Strategies II. This Application
seeks exemptive relief only for the Existing Variable Fund and any
Future Variable Fund of the Trust as defined herein but does not seek
exemptive relief for the Arden Alternative Strategies Fund or Arden
Alternative Strategies II because they are not designed to be sold to
VA Accounts and/or VLI Accounts.
2. Arden serves as the investment adviser to the Trust and the
Existing Variable Fund. Arden is a Delaware limited liability company
and is registered as an investment adviser under the Investment
Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. Subject to the authority of the Board
of Trustees of the Trust, Arden is responsible for the overall
management of the business
[[Page 63256]]
affairs of the Trust and oversees the investment operations of the
Existing Variable Fund, including the purchase, retention and
disposition of securities in accordance with the Fund's investment
objective.
3. The Existing Variable Fund proposes, and Future Variable Funds
will propose, to offer their shares to VLI and VA Accounts of various
life insurance companies (``Participating Insurance Companies'') to
serve as investment media to support variable life insurance contracts
and variable annuity contracts (together, ``Variable Contracts'')
issued through such accounts. Each VLI Account and VA Account is or
will be established as a segregated asset account by a Participating
Insurance Company pursuant to the insurance law of the insurance
company's state of domicile. As such, the assets of each will be the
property of the Participating Insurance Company, and that portion of
the assets of such an Account equal to the reserves and other contract
liabilities with respect to the Account will not be chargeable with
liabilities arising out of any other business that the insurance
company may conduct. The income, gains and losses, realized or
unrealized from such an Account's assets will be credited to or charged
against the Account without regard to other income, gains or losses of
the Participating Insurance Company. If a VLI Account or VA Account is
registered as an investment company, it will be a ``separate account''
as defined by Rule 0-1(e) (or any successor rule) under the Act and
will be registered as a unit investment trust. For purposes of the Act,
the Participating Insurance Company that establishes such a registered
VLI Account or VA Account is the depositor and sponsor of the Account
as those terms have been interpreted by the Commission with respect to
variable life insurance and variable annuity separate accounts.
4. There are currently no Participating Insurance Companies.
5. The Funds will sell their shares to VLI and VA Accounts only if
each Participating Insurance Company sponsoring such a VLI or VA
Account enters into a participation agreement with the Funds. The
participation agreements define or will define the relationship between
each Fund and each Participating Insurance Company and memorialize or
will memorialize, among other matters, the fact that, except where the
agreement specifically provides otherwise, the Participating Insurance
Company will remain responsible for establishing and maintaining any
VLI or VA Account covered by the agreement and for complying with all
applicable requirements of state and federal law pertaining to such
accounts and to the sale and distribution of Variable Contracts issued
through such Accounts. The role of the Funds under this arrangement,
with regard to the federal securities laws, will consist of offering
and selling shares of the Funds to the separate accounts and fulfilling
any conditions that the Commission may impose in granting the requested
order.
6. The use of a common management investment company (or investment
portfolio thereof) as an investment medium for both VLI Accounts and VA
Accounts of the same Participating Insurance Company, or of two or more
insurance companies that are affiliated persons of each other, is
referred to herein as ``mixed funding.'' The use of a common management
investment company (or investment portfolio thereof) as an investment
medium for VLI Accounts and/or VA Accounts of two or more Participating
Insurance Companies that are not affiliated persons of each other is
referred to herein as ``shared funding.''
7. Applicants propose that the Existing Variable Fund and any
Future Variable Funds may offer their shares directly to Qualified
Plans, the Fund's Advisers, and a General Account of any Participating
Insurance Companies.
8. The use of a common management investment company (or investment
portfolio thereof) as an investment medium for VLI Accounts, VA
Accounts, Qualified Plans, Advisers and General Accounts is referred to
herein as ``extended mixed funding.''
Applicants' Legal Analysis
1. Section 9(a) of the 1940 Act makes it unlawful for any company
to serve as an investment adviser or principal underwriter of any
investment company, including a unit investment trust, if an affiliated
person of that company is subject to disqualification enumerated in
Section 9(a)(1) or (2) of the Act. Sections 13(a), 15(a), and 15(b) of
the 1940 Act have been deemed by the Commission to require ``pass-
through'' voting with respect to an underlying investment company's
shares.
2. Rules 6e-2(b)(15) and 6e-3(T)(b)(15) under the Act provide
partial exemptions from Sections 9(a), 13(a), 15(a), and 15(b) of the
Act to VLI Accounts supporting certain VLI Contracts and to their life
insurance company depositors under limited circumstances, as described
in the application. VLI Accounts, their depositors and their principal
underwriters may not rely on the exemptions provided by Rules 6e-
2(b)(15) and 6e-3(T)(b)(15) if shares of the Fund are held by a VLI
Account through which certain VLI Contracts are issued, a VLI Account
of an unaffiliated Participating Insurance Company, an unaffiliated
Adviser, any VA Account, a Qualified Plan or a General Account.
Accordingly, Applicants request an order of the Commission granting
exemptions from Sections 9(a), 13(a), 15(a), and 15(b) of the Act and
Rules 6e-2(b)(15) and 6e-3(T)(b)(15) thereunder in cases where certain
VLI Account hold shares of the Funds and one or more of the following
types of investors also hold shares of the Funds: (i) VA Accounts and
VLI Accounts (supporting scheduled premium or flexible premium VLI
Contracts) of affiliated and unaffiliated Participating Insurance
Companies; (ii) Qualified Plans; (iii) Advisers; and/or (iv) General
Accounts.
3. Applicants maintain that there is no policy reason for the sale
of Fund shares to Qualified Plans, Advisers or General Accounts to
prohibit or otherwise limit a Participating Insurance Company from
relying on the relief provided by Rules 6e-2(b)(15) and 6e-3(T)(b)(15).
Nonetheless, Rule 6e-2 and Rule 6e-3(T) each specifically provides that
the relief granted thereunder is available only where shares of the
underlying fund are offered exclusively to insurance company separate
accounts. In this regard, Applicants request exemptive relief to the
extent necessary to permit shares of the Funds to be sold to Qualified
Plans, Advisers and General Accounts while allowing Participating
Insurance Companies and their VA Accounts and VLI Accounts to enjoy the
benefits of the relief granted under Rule 6e-2(b)(15) and Rule 6e-
3(T)(b)(15). Applicants note that if the Funds were to sell their
shares only to Qualified Plans, exemptive relief under Rule 6e-2 and
Rule 6e-3(T) would not be necessary. The relief provided for under Rule
6e-2(b)(15) and Rule 6e-3(T)(b)(15) does not relate to Qualified Plans,
Advisers or General Accounts or to a registered investment company's
ability to sell its shares to such purchasers.
4. Applicants are not aware of any reason for excluding separate
accounts and investment companies engaged in shared funding from the
exemptive relief provided under Rules 6e-2(b)(15) and 6e-3(T)(b)(15),
or for excluding separate accounts and investment companies engaged in
mixed funding from the exemptive relief provided under Rule 6e-
2(b)(15). Similarly,
[[Page 63257]]
Applicants are not aware of any reason for excluding Participating
Insurance Companies from the exemptive relief requested because the
Funds may also sell their shares to Qualified Plans, Advisers and
General Accounts. Rather, Applicants submit that the proposed sale of
shares of the Funds to these purchasers may allow for the development
of larger pools of assets resulting in the potential for greater
investment and diversification opportunities, and for decreased
expenses at higher asset levels resulting in greater cost efficiencies.
5. For the reasons explained below, Applicants have concluded that
investment by Qualified Plans, Advisers and General Accounts in the
Funds should not increase the risk of material irreconcilable conflicts
between owners of VLI Contracts and other types of investors or between
owners of VLI Contracts issued by unaffiliated Participating Insurance
Companies.
6. Consistent with the Commission's authority under Section 6(c) of
the Act to grant exemptive orders to a class or classes of persons and
transactions, Applicants request exemptions for a class consisting of
Participating Insurance Companies and their separate accounts investing
in the Existing Variable Fund and Future Variable Funds, as well as
their principal underwriters, that currently invest or in the future
will invest in the Funds.
7. Section 6(c) of the Act provides, in part, that the Commission,
by order upon application, may conditionally or unconditionally exempt
any person, security or transaction, or any class or classes of
persons, securities or transactions, from any provision or provisions
of the Act, or any rule or regulation thereunder, if and to the extent
that such exemption is necessary or appropriate in the public interest
and consistent with the protection of investors and the purposes fairly
intended by the policy and provisions of the Act. The Applicants submit
that the exemptions requested are appropriate in the public interest
and consistent with the protection of investors and the purposes fairly
intended by the policy and provisions of the Act.
8. Section 9(a)(3) of the Act provides, among other things, that it
is unlawful for any company to serve as investment adviser or principal
underwriter of any registered open-end investment company if an
affiliated person of that company is subject to a disqualification
enumerated in Sections 9(a)(1) or (2). Rules 6e-2(b)(15)(i) and (ii)
and Rules 6e-3(T)(b)(15)(i) and (ii) under the Act provide exemptions
from Section 9(a) under certain circumstances, subject to the
limitations discussed above on mixed funding, extended mixed funding
and shared funding. These exemptions limit the application of the
eligibility restrictions to affiliated individuals or companies that
directly participate in management of the underlying investment
company.
9. Rules 6e-2(b)(15)(iii) and 6e-3(T)(b)(15)(iii) under the Act
provide exemptions from pass-through voting requirements with respect
to several significant matters, assuming the limitations on mixed
funding, extended mixed funding and shared funding are observed. Rules
6e-2(b)(15)(iii)(A) and 6e-3(T)(b)(15)(iii)(A) provide that the
insurance company may disregard the voting instructions of its variable
life insurance contract owners with respect to the investments of an
underlying investment company, or any contract between such an
investment company and its investment adviser, when required to do so
by an insurance regulatory authority (subject to the provisions of
paragraphs (b)(5)(i) and (b)(7)(ii)(A) of Rules 6e-2 and 6e-3(T)).
10. The Applicants represent that the sale of Fund shares to
Qualified Plans, Advisers or General Accounts will not have any impact
on the exemptions requested herein regarding the disregard of pass-
through voting rights. Shares sold to Qualified Plans will be held by
such Plans. The exercise of voting rights by Plans, whether by
trustees, participants, beneficiaries, or investment managers engaged
by the Plans, does not raise the type of issues respecting disregard of
voting rights that are raised by VLI Accounts. With respect to Plans,
which are not registered as investment companies under the Act, there
is no requirement to pass through voting rights to Plan participants.
Indeed, to the contrary, applicable law expressly reserves voting
rights associated with Plan assets to certain specified persons as
disclosed in the application.
11. Similarly, Advisers and General Accounts are not subject to any
pass-through voting rights. Accordingly, unlike the circumstances
surrounding VLI Account and VA Account investments in shares of the
Funds, the issue of the resolution of any material irreconcilable
conflicts with respect to voting is not present with respect to
Advisers or General Accounts of Participating Insurance Companies.
12. Applicants recognize that the prohibitions on mixed and shared
funding might reflect concern regarding possible different investment
motivations among investors. When Rule 6e-2 was first adopted, variable
annuity separate accounts could invest in mutual funds whose shares
were also offered to the general public. However, now, under the tax
code any underlying fund, including the Funds, that sells shares to VA
Accounts or VLI Accounts, would, in effect, be precluded from also
selling its shares to the public. Consequently, the Funds may not sell
their shares to the public.
13. Applicants assert that the rights of an insurance company on
its own initiative or on instructions from a state insurance regulator
to disregard the voting instructions of owners of Variable Contracts is
not inconsistent with either mixed funding or shared funding.
Applicants state that The National Association of Insurance
Commissioners Variable Life Insurance Model Regulation (the ``NAIC
Model Regulation'') suggests that it is unlikely that insurance
regulators would find an underlying fund's investment policy,
investment adviser or principal underwriter objectionable for one type
of Variable Contract but not another type.
14. Applicants assert that shared funding by unaffiliated insurance
companies does not present any issues that do not already exist where a
single insurance company is licensed to do business in several or all
states. A particular state insurance regulator could require action
that is inconsistent with the requirements of other states in which the
insurance company offers its contracts. However, the fact that
different insurers may be domiciled in different states does not create
a significantly different or enlarged problem. Shared funding by
unaffiliated insurers, in this respect, is no different than the use of
the same investment company as the funding vehicle for affiliated
insurers, which Rules 6e-2(b)(15) and 6e-3(T)(b)(15) permit. Affiliated
insurers may be domiciled in different states and be subject to
differing state law requirements. Affiliation does not reduce the
potential, if any exists, for differences in state regulatory
requirements. In any event, the conditions set forth below are designed
to safeguard against, and provide procedures for resolving, any adverse
effects that differences among state regulatory requirements may
produce. If a particular state insurance regulator's decision conflicts
with the majority of other state regulators, then the affected
Participating Insurance Company will be required to withdraw its
separate account investments in the relevant Fund. This requirement
will be provided for in the participation agreement that will be
entered into by Participating Insurance Companies with the relevant
Fund.
[[Page 63258]]
15. Rules 6e-2(b)(15) and 6e-3(T)(b)(15) give Participating
Insurance Companies the right to disregard the voting instructions of
VLI Contract owners in certain circumstances. This right derives from
the authority of state insurance regulators over VLI Accounts and VA
Accounts. Under Rules 6e-2(b)(15) and 6e-3(T)(b)(15), a Participating
Insurance Company may disregard VLI Contract owner voting instructions
only with respect to certain specified items. Affiliation does not
eliminate the potential, if any exists, for divergent judgments as to
the advisability or legality of a change in investment policies,
principal underwriter or investment adviser initiated by such Contract
owners. The potential for disagreement is limited by the requirements
in Rules 6e-2 and 6e-3(T) that the Participating Insurance Company's
disregard of voting instructions be reasonable and based on specific
good faith determinations.
16. A particular Participating Insurance Company's disregard of
voting instructions, nevertheless, could conflict with the voting
instructions of a majority of VLI Contract owners. The Participating
Insurance Company's action possibly could be different than the
determination of all or some of the other Participating Insurance
Companies (including affiliated insurers) that the voting instructions
of VLI Contract owners should prevail, and either could preclude a
majority vote approving the change or could represent a minority view.
If the Participating Insurance Company's judgment represents a minority
position or would preclude a majority vote, then the Participating
Insurance Company may be required, at the relevant Fund's election, to
withdraw its VLI Accounts' and VA Accounts' investments in the relevant
Fund. No charge or penalty will be imposed as a result of such
withdrawal. This requirement will be provided for in the participation
agreement entered into by the Participating Insurance Companies with
the relevant Fund.
17. Applicants assert that there is no reason why the investment
policies of a Fund would or should be materially different from what
these policies would or should be if the Fund supported only VA
Accounts or VLI Accounts, whether flexible premium or scheduled premium
VLI Contracts. Each type of insurance contract is designed as a long-
term investment program.
18. Each Fund will be managed to attempt to achieve its specified
investment objective, and not favor or disfavor any particular
Participating Insurance Company or type of insurance contract. There is
no reason to believe that different features of various types of
Variable Contracts will lead to different investment policies for each
or for different VLI Accounts and VA Accounts. The sale of Variable
Contracts and ultimate success of all VA Accounts and VLI Accounts
depends, at least in part, on satisfactory investment performance,
which provides an incentive for each Participating Insurance Company to
seek optimal investment performance.
19. Furthermore, no single investment strategy can be identified as
appropriate to a particular Variable Contract. Each ``pool'' of VLI
Contract and VA Contract owners is composed of individuals of diverse
financial status, age, insurance needs and investment goals. A Fund
supporting even one type of Variable Contract must accommodate these
diverse factors in order to attract and retain purchasers. Permitting
mixed and shared funding will provide economic support for the
continuation of the Funds. Mixed and shared funding will broaden the
base of potential Variable Contract owner investors, which may
facilitate the establishment of additional Funds serving diverse goals.
20. Applicants do not believe that the sale of the shares to Plans,
Advisers or General Accounts will increase the potential for material
irreconcilable conflicts of interest between or among different types
of investors. In particular, Applicants see very little potential for
such conflicts beyond those that would otherwise exist between owners
of VLI Contracts and VA Contracts. Applicants submit that either there
are no conflicts of interest or that there exists the ability by the
affected parties to resolve such conflicts consistent with the best
interests of VLI Contract owners, VA Contract owners and Plan
participants.
21. Applicants considered whether there are any issues raised under
the Code, Treasury Regulations, or Revenue Rulings thereunder, if
Qualified Plans, VA Accounts, VLI Accounts, Advisers and General
Accounts all invest in the same Fund. Applicants have concluded that
neither the Code, nor the Treasury Regulations nor Revenue Rulings
thereunder present any inherent conflicts of interest if Qualified
Plans, VA Accounts, VLI Accounts, Advisers and General Accounts all
invest in the same Fund.
22. Applicants note that, while there are differences in the manner
in which distributions from separate accounts and Qualified Plans are
taxed, these differences have no impact on the Funds. When
distributions are to be made, and a separate account or Plan is unable
to net purchase payments to make distributions, the separate account or
Plan will redeem shares of the relevant Fund at its net asset values in
conformity with Rule 22c-1 under the Act (without the imposition of any
sales charge) to provide proceeds to meet distribution needs. A
Participating Insurance Company will then make distributions in
accordance with the terms of its Variable Contracts, and a Plan will
then make distributions in accordance with the terms of the Plan.
23. Applicants considered whether it is possible to provide an
equitable means of giving voting rights to Variable Contract owners,
Plans, Advisers and General Accounts. In connection with any meeting of
Fund shareholders, the Fund will inform each Participating Insurance
Company (with respect to its separate accounts and general account),
Adviser, and Qualified Plan of its share holdings and provide other
information necessary for such shareholders to participate in the
meeting (e.g., proxy materials). Each Participating Insurance Company
then will solicit voting instructions from owners of VLI Contracts and
VA Contracts in accordance with Rules 6e-2 or 6e-3(T), or Section
12(d)(1)(E)(iii)(aa) of the Act, as applicable, and its participation
agreement with the relevant Fund. Shares of a Fund that are held by an
Adviser or a General Account will generally be in the same proportion
as all votes cast on behalf of all Variable Contract owners having
voting rights. However, an Adviser or General Account will vote its
shares in such other manner as may be required by the Commission or its
staff. Shares held by Plans will be voted in accordance with applicable
law. The voting rights provided to Plans with respect to the shares
would be no different from the voting rights that are provided to Plans
with respect to shares of mutual funds sold to the general public.
Furthermore, if a material irreconcilable conflict arises because of a
Plan's decision to disregard Plan participant voting instructions, if
applicable, and that decision represents a minority position or would
preclude a majority vote, the Plan may be required, at the election of
the relevant Fund, to withdraw its investment in the Fund, and no
charge or penalty will be imposed as a result of such withdrawal.
24. Applicants do not believe that the ability of a Fund to sell
its shares to a Qualified Plan, Adviser or General Account gives rise
to a senior security as defined by Section 18(g) of the Act. Regardless
of the rights and benefits of participants under Plans or owners of
Variable Contracts, VLI Accounts, VA
[[Page 63259]]
Accounts, Qualified Plans, Advisers and General Accounts only have, or
will only have, rights with respect to their respective shares of a
Fund. These parties can only redeem such shares at net asset value. No
shareholder of a class of the Fund has any preference over any other
shareholder of the class with respect to distribution of assets or
payment of dividends.
25. Applicants do not believe that the veto power of state
insurance commissioners over certain potential changes to Fund
investment objectives approved by Variable Contract owners creates
conflicts between the interests of such owners and the interests of
Plan participants, Advisers or General Accounts. Applicants note that a
basic premise of corporate democracy and shareholder voting is that not
all shareholders may agree with a particular proposal. Their interests
and opinions may differ, but this does not mean that inherent conflicts
of interest exist between or among such shareholders or that occasional
conflicts of interest that do occur between or among them are likely to
be irreconcilable.
26. Although Participating Insurance Companies may have to overcome
regulatory impediments in redeeming shares of a Fund held by their
separate accounts, Applicants state that the Plans and participants in
participant-directed Plans can make decisions quickly and redeem their
shares in a Fund and reinvest in another investment company or other
funding vehicle without impediments, or as is the case with most Plans,
hold cash pending suitable investment. As a result, conflicts between
the interests of Variable Contract owners and the interests of Plans
and Plan participants can usually be resolved quickly since the Plans
can, on their own, redeem their Fund shares. Advisers and General
Accounts can similarly redeem their shares of a Fund and make
alternative investments at any time.
27. Finally, Applicants considered whether there is a potential for
future conflicts of interest between Participating Insurance Companies
and Qualified Plans created by future changes in the tax laws.
Applicants do not see any greater potential for material irreconcilable
conflicts arising between the interests of Variable Contract owners and
Plan participants from future changes in the federal tax laws than that
which already exists between VLI Contract owners and VA Contract
owners.
28. Applicants recognize that the foregoing is not an all-inclusive
list, but rather is representative of issues that they believe are
relevant to this Application. Applicants believe that the sale of Fund
shares to Qualified Plans would not increase the risk of material
irreconcilable conflicts between the interests of Plan participants and
Variable Contract owners or other investors. Further, Applicants submit
that the use of the Funds with respect to Plans is not substantially
dissimilar from each Fund's current and anticipated use, in that Plans,
like separate accounts, are generally long-term investors.
29. Applicants assert that permitting a Fund to sell its shares to
an Adviser or to the General Account of a Participating Insurance
Company for the purpose of obtaining see money will enhance management
of each Fund without raising significant concerns regarding material
irreconcilable conflicts among different types of investors.
30. Various factors have limited the number of insurance companies
that offer Variable Contracts. These factors include the costs of
organizing and operating a funding vehicle, certain insurers' lack of
experience with respect to investment management, and the lack of name
recognition by the public of certain insurance companies as investment
experts. In particular, some smaller life insurance companies may not
find it economically feasible, or within their investment or
administrative expertise, to enter the Variable Contract business on
their own. Use of the Funds as a common investment vehicle for Variable
Contracts would reduce or eliminate these concerns. Mixed and shared
funding should also provide several benefits to owners of Variable
Contracts by eliminating a significant portion of the costs of
establishing and administering separate underlying funds.
31. Applicants state that the Participating Insurance Companies
will benefit not only from the investment and administrative expertise
of the Funds' Adviser, but also from the potential cost efficiencies
and investment flexibility afforded by larger pools of funds.
Therefore, making the Funds available for mixed and shared funding will
encourage more insurance companies to offer Variable Contracts. This
should result in increased competition with respect to both Variable
Contract design and pricing, which can in turn be expected to result in
more product variety. Applicants also assert that sale of shares in a
Fund to Qualified Plans, in addition to VLI Accounts and VA Accounts,
will result in an increased amount of assets available for investment
in a Fund.
32. Applicants also submit that, regardless of the type of
shareholder in a Fund, an Adviser is or would be contractually and
otherwise obligated to manage the Fund solely and exclusively in
accordance with the Fund's investment objectives, policies and
restrictions, as well as any guidelines established by the Fund's Board
of Trustees (the ``Board'').
33. Applicants assert that sales of Fund shares, as described
above, will not have any adverse federal income tax consequences to
other investors in such a Fund.
34. In addition, Applicants assert that granting the exemptions
requested herein is in the public interest and, as discussed above,
will not compromise the regulatory purposes of Sections 9(a), 13(a),
15(a), or 15(b) of the Act or Rules 6e-2 or 6e-3(T) thereunder.
Applicants' Conditions
Applicants agree that the Commission order requested herein shall
be subject to the following conditions:
1. A majority of the Board of each Fund will consist of persons who
are not ``interested persons'' of the Fund, as defined by Section
2(a)(19) of the Act, and the rules thereunder, and as modified by any
applicable orders of the Commission, except that if this condition is
not met by reason of death, disqualification or bona fide resignation
of any trustee or trustees, then the operation of this condition will
be suspended: (a) For a period of 90 days if the vacancy or vacancies
may be filled by the Board; (b) for a period of 150 days if a vote of
shareholders is required to fill the vacancy or vacancies; or (c) for
such longer period as the Commission may prescribe by order upon
application, or by future rule.
2. The Board will monitor a Fund for the existence of any material
irreconcilable conflict between and among the interests of the owners
of all VLI Contracts and VA Contracts and participants of all Plans
investing in the Fund, and determine what action, if any, should be
taken in response to such conflicts. A material irreconcilable conflict
may arise for a variety of reasons, including: (a) An action by any
state insurance regulatory authority; (b) a change in applicable
federal or state insurance, tax, or securities laws or regulations, or
a public ruling, private letter ruling, no-action or interpretive
letter, or any similar action by insurance, tax or securities
regulatory authorities; (c) an administrative or judicial decision in
any relevant proceeding; (d) the manner in which the
[[Page 63260]]
investments of the Fund are being managed; (e) a difference in voting
instructions given by VA Contract owners, VLI Contract owners, and
Plans or Plan participants; (f) a decision by a Participating Insurance
Company to disregard the voting instructions of contract owners; or (g)
if applicable, a decision by a Plan to disregard the voting
instructions of Plan participants.
3. Participating Insurance Companies (on their own behalf, as well
as by virtue of any investment of General Account assets in a Fund),
the Advisers, and any Plan that executes a participation agreement upon
its becoming an owner of 10% or more of the assets of a Fund
(collectively, ``Participants'') will report any potential or existing
conflicts to the Board. Each Participant will be responsible for
assisting the Board in carrying out the Board's responsibilities under
these conditions by providing the Board with all information reasonably
necessary for the Board to consider any issues raised. This
responsibility includes, but is not limited to, an obligation by each
Participating Insurance Company to inform the Board whenever Variable
Contract owner voting instructions are disregarded, and, if pass-
through voting is applicable, an obligation by each trustee for a Plan
to inform the Board whenever it has determined to disregard Plan
participant voting instructions. The responsibility to report such
information and conflicts, and to assist the Board, will be a
contractual obligation of all Participating Insurance Companies under
their participation agreement with a Fund, and these responsibilities
will be carried out with a view only to the interests of the Variable
Contract owners. The responsibility to report such information and
conflicts, and to assist the Board, also will be contractual
obligations of all Plans under their participation agreement with a
Fund, and such agreements will provide that these responsibilities will
be carried out with a view only to the interests of Plan participants.
4. If it is determined by a majority of the Board, or a majority of
the disinterested trustees of the Board, that a material irreconcilable
conflict exists, then the relevant Participant will, at its expense and
to the extent reasonably practicable (as determined by a majority of
the disinterested trustees), take whatever steps are necessary to
remedy or eliminate the material irreconcilable conflict, up to and
including: (a) Withdrawing the assets allocable to some or all of their
VLI Accounts or VA Accounts from the Fund and reinvesting such assets
in a different investment vehicle, including another Fund; (b) in the
case of a Participating Insurance Company, submitting the question as
to whether such segregation should be implemented to a vote of all
affected Variable Contract owners and, as appropriate, segregating the
assets of any appropriate group (i.e., VA Contract owners or VLI
Contact owners of one or more Participating Insurance Companies) that
votes in favor of such segregation, or offering to the affected
Contract owners the option of making such a change; (c) withdrawing the
assets allocable to some or all of the Plans from the affected Fund and
reinvesting them in a different investment medium; and (d) establishing
a new registered management investment company or managed separate
account. If a material irreconcilable conflict arises because of a
decision by a Participating Insurance Company to disregard Variable
Contract owner voting instructions, and that decision represents a
minority position or would preclude a majority vote, then the
Participating Insurance Company may be required, at the election of the
Fund, to withdraw such Participating Insurance Company's VLI Account
and VA Account investments in the Fund, and no charge or penalty will
be imposed as a result of such withdrawal. If a material irreconcilable
conflict arises because of a Plan's decision to disregard Plan
participant voting instructions, if applicable, and that decision
represents a minority position or would preclude a majority vote, the
Plan may be required, at the election of the Fund, to withdraw its
investment in the Fund, and no charge or penalty will be imposed as a
result of such withdrawal. The responsibility to take remedial action
in the event of a Board determination of a material irreconcilable
conflict and to bear the cost of such remedial action will be a
contractual obligation of all Participants under their participation
agreement with a Fund, and these responsibilities will be carried out
with a view only to the interests of Variable Contract owners or, as
applicable, Plan participants.
For purposes of this Condition 4, a majority of the disinterested
trustees of the Board of a Fund will determine whether or not any
proposed action adequately remedies any material irreconcilable
conflict, but, in no event, will the Fund or its investment adviser be
required to establish a new funding vehicle for any Variable Contract
or Plan. No Participating Insurance Company will be required by this
Condition 4 to establish a new funding vehicle for any Variable
Contract if any offer to do so has been declined by vote of a majority
of the Contract owners materially and adversely affected by the
material irreconcilable conflict. Further, no Plan will be required by
this Condition 4 to establish a new funding vehicle for the Plan if:
(a) A majority of the Plan participants materially and adversely
affected by the irreconcilable material conflict vote to decline such
offer, or (b) pursuant to documents governing the Plan, the Plan
trustee makes such decision without a Plan participant vote.
5. The determination by the Board of the existence of a material
irreconcilable conflict and its implications will be made known in
writing promptly to all Participants.
6. Participating Insurance Companies will provide pass-through
voting privileges to all Variable Contract owners whose Contracts are
issued through registered VLI Accounts or registered VA Accounts for as
long as the Commission continues to interpret the Act as requiring such
pass-through voting privileges. However, as to Variable Contracts
issued through VA Accounts or VLI Accounts not registered as investment
companies under the Act, pass-through voting privileges will be
extended to owners of such Contracts to the extent granted by the
Participating Insurance Company. Accordingly, such Participating
Insurance Companies, where applicable, will vote the shares of each
Fund held in their VLI Accounts and VA Accounts in a manner consistent
with voting instructions timely received from Variable Contract owners.
Participating Insurance Companies will be responsible for assuring that
each of their VLI and VA Accounts investing in a Fund calculates voting
privileges in a manner consistent with all other Participating
Insurance Companies investing in that Fund.
The obligation to calculate voting privileges as provided in this
Application shall be a contractual obligation of all Participating
Insurance Companies under their participation agreement with the Fund.
Each Participating Insurance Company will vote shares of each Fund held
in its VLI or VA Accounts for which no timely voting instructions are
received, as well as shares held in its General Account or otherwise
attributed to it, in the same proportion as those shares for which
voting instructions are received. Each Plan will vote as required by
applicable law, governing Plan documents and as provided in this
Application.
7. As long as the Commission continues to interpret the Act as
requiring that pass-through voting privileges be provided to Variable
[[Page 63261]]
Contract owners, a Fund Adviser or any General Account will vote its
respective shares of the Fund in the same proportion as all votes cast
on behalf of all Variable Contract owners having voting rights;
provided, however, that such an Adviser or General Account shall vote
its shares in such other manner as may be required by the Commission or
its staff.
8. Each Fund will comply with all provisions of the Act requiring
voting by shareholders (which, for these purposes, shall be the persons
having a voting interest in its shares), and, in particular, the Fund
will either provide for annual meetings (except to the extent that the
Commission may interpret Section 16 of the Act not to require such
meetings) or comply with Section 16(c) of the Act (although each Fund
is not, or will not be, one of those trusts of the type described in
Section 16(c) of the Act), as well as with Section 16(a) of the Act
and, if and when applicable, Section 16(b) of the Act. Further, each
Fund will act in accordance with the Commission's interpretations of
the requirements of Section 16(a) with respect to periodic elections of
trustees and with whatever rules the Commission may promulgate
thereunder.
9. A Fund will make its shares available to the VLI Accounts, VA
Accounts, and Plans at or about the time it accepts any seed capital
from its Adviser or from the General Account of a Participating
Insurance Company.
10. Each Fund has notified, or will notify, all Participants that
disclosure regarding potential risks of mixed and shared funding may be
appropriate in VLI Account and VA Account prospectuses or Plan
documents. Each Fund will disclose, in its prospectus that: (a) Shares
of the Fund may be offered to both VA Accounts and VLI Accounts and, if
applicable, to Plans; (b) due to differences in tax treatment and other
considerations, the interests of various Variable Contract owners
participating in the Fund and the interests of Plan participants
investing in the Fund, if applicable, may conflict; and (c) the Fund's
Board will monitor events in order to identify the existence of any
material irreconcilable conflicts and to determine what action, if any,
should be taken in response to any such conflicts.
11. If and to the extent Rule 6e-2 and Rule 6e-3(T) under the Act
are amended, or proposed Rule 6e-3 under the Act is adopted, to provide
exemptive relief from any provision of the Act, or the rules
thereunder, with respect to mixed or shared funding, on terms and
conditions materially different from any exemptions granted in the
order requested in this Application, then each Fund and/or
Participating Insurance Companies, as appropriate, shall take such
steps as may be necessary to comply with Rules 6e-2 or 6e-3(T), as
amended, or Rule 6e-3, to the extent such rules are applicable.
12. Each Participant, at least annually, shall submit to the Board
of each Fund such reports, materials or data as the Board reasonably
may request so that the trustees may fully carry out the obligations
imposed upon the Board by the conditions contained in this Application.
Such reports, materials and data shall be submitted more frequently if
deemed appropriate by the Board. The obligations of the Participants to
provide these reports, materials and data to the Board, when it so
reasonably requests, shall be a contractual obligation of all
Participants under their participation agreement with the Fund.
13. All reports of potential or existing conflicts received by a
Board, and all Board action with regard to determining the existence of
a conflict, notifying Participants of a conflict and determining
whether any proposed action adequately remedies a conflict, will be
properly recorded in the minutes of the Board or other appropriate
records, and such minutes or other records shall be made available to
the Commission upon request.
14. Each Fund will not accept a purchase order from a Qualified
Plan if such purchase would make the Plan an owner of 10 percent or
more of the assets of the Fund unless the Plan executes an agreement
with the Fund governing participation in the Fund that includes the
conditions set forth herein to the extent applicable. A Plan will
execute an application containing an acknowledgement of this condition
at the time of its initial purchase of shares.
Conclusion
Applicants submit, for all of the reasons explained above, that the
exemptions requested are appropriate in the public interest and
consistent with the protection of investors and the purposes fairly
intended by the policy and provisions of the Act.
For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management,
pursuant to delegated authority.
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-24770 Filed 10-22-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P