Self-Regulatory Organizations; BATS Y-Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Related to Fees for Use of BATS Y-Exchange, Inc., 62907-62909 [2013-24659]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 22, 2013 / Notices
increase nor decrease intramarket
competition because the increased
rebate offered by the tier would apply
uniformly to all Members that meet the
requirements necessary to achieve the
tier.
Amendment to Market Depth Tier
The Exchange believes that the
proposed non-substantive change to the
Market Depth Tier would neither affect
intermarket nor intramarket competition
because the change does not alter the
criteria necessary to achieve the tier nor
does it alter the rate offered by the tier.
Amendment to the Tape B Step-Up Tier
The Exchange believes that the
proposed increased rebate under the
Tape B Step-Up Tier would increase
intermarket competition because it
would encourage market participants to
send additional liquidity in Tape B
securities to EDGX in exchange for a
higher rebate. The Exchange believes
that the proposed increased rebate
would neither increase nor decrease
intramarket competition because the
increased rebate offered by the tier
would apply uniformly to all Members
that meet the requirements necessary to
achieve the tier.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with FRONT MATTER
Amendments to the MidPoint Match
Volume Tier
The Exchange believes that its
proposal to decrease the ADV
requirement in Flags MM and/or MT in
the MidPoint Match Volume Tier would
increase intermarket competition
because the lower ADV requirement
would incentivize Members that could
not previously meet the tier to send
higher volume to the Exchange. The
Exchange believes that its proposal
would neither increase nor decrease
intramarket competition because the
MidPoint Match Volume Tier would
continue to apply uniformly to all
Members and the ability of some
Members to meet the tier would only
benefit other Members by contributing
to increased liquidity at the midpoint of
the NBBO and better market quality at
the Exchange.
Flag RZ
The Exchange believes that its
proposal to pass through a rebate of
$0.0020 per share for Members’ orders
that yield Flag RZ would increase
intermarket competition because it
offers customers an alternative means to
route to BATS for the same price as
entering orders on BATS directly. The
Exchange believes that its proposal
would not burden intramarket
competition because the proposed rate
would apply uniformly to all Members.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
21:08 Oct 21, 2013
Jkt 232001
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange has not solicited, and
does not intend to solicit, comments on
this proposed rule change. The
Exchange has not received any
unsolicited written comments from
Members or other interested parties.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 16 and Rule 19b–4(f)(2) 17
thereunder. At any time within 60 days
of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number
SR–EDGX–2013–37 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–EDGX–2013–37. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
16 15
17 17
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
Frm 00325
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
62907
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–EDGX–
2013–37 and should be submitted on or
before November 12, 2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.18
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–24555 Filed 10–21–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–70666; File No. SR–BYX–
2013–034]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; BATS
Y-Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change Related to Fees for Use
of BATS Y-Exchange, Inc.
October 11, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on
September 30, 2013, BATS Y-Exchange,
Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘BYX’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange.
The Exchange has designated the
proposed rule change as one
establishing or changing a member due,
fee, or other charge imposed by the
Exchange under Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii)
of the Act 3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(2)
thereunder,4 which renders the
18 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
1 15
E:\FR\FM\22OCN1.SGM
22OCN1
62908
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 22, 2013 / Notices
proposed rule change effective upon
filing with the Commission. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of the Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the
fee schedule applicable to Members 5
and non-members of the Exchange
pursuant to BYX Rules 15.1(a) and (c).
Changes to the fee schedule pursuant to
this proposal are effective upon filing.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available at the Exchange’s Web site
at https://www.batstrading.com, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with FRONT MATTER
1. Purpose
Exchange proposes to modify its fee
schedule effective September 30, 2013,
in order to amend the way that the
Exchange calculates rebates for
removing liquidity from and fees for
adding liquidity to the Exchange.
Specifically, the Exchange is proposing
to amend the methodology by which it
determines the rebate that it will
provide and fee it will charge to
Members based on the Exchange’s tiered
pricing structure by excluding from the
calculation of both ADV 6 and average
daily TCV 7 any day that trading is not
5 A Member is any registered broker or dealer that
has been admitted to membership in the Exchange.
6 As provided in the fee schedule, ‘‘ADV’’ means
average daily volume calculated as the number of
shares added or removed, combined, per day on a
monthly basis; routed shares are not included in
ADV calculation.
7 As provided in the fee schedule ‘‘TCV’’ means
total consolidated volume calculated as the volume
reported by all exchanges and trade reporting
facilities to a consolidated transaction reporting
plan for the month for which the fees apply.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
21:08 Oct 21, 2013
Jkt 232001
available on the Exchange for more than
sixty (60) minutes during regular trading
hours (i.e., 9:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
Eastern Time) but continues on other
markets during such time (an ‘‘Exchange
Outage’’).
The Exchange currently offers a tiered
structure for determining the rebates
that Members receive for executions that
remove liquidity from the Exchange and
the fees that Members are charged for
executions that add liquidity to the
Exchange. Under the tiered pricing
structure, the Exchange provides
different rebates and charges different
fees to Members based on a Member’s
ADV as a percentage of average daily
TCV. The Exchange notes that it is not
proposing to modify any of the existing
rebates or fees or the percentage
thresholds at which a Member may
qualify for certain rebates and fees
pursuant to the tiered pricing structure.
Rather, as mentioned above, the
Exchange is proposing to modify its fee
schedule in order to exclude trading
activity occurring on any day that the
Exchange experiences an Exchange
Outage, defined as an outage lasting for
more than sixty (60) minutes, from the
calculation of ADV and average daily
TCV. The Exchange believes that
including trading activity on days when
trading on the Exchange is unavailable
for a significant portion of the day can
unfairly skew the calculation of ADV
and TCV. Thus, the Exchange believes
that the most accurate and fair
implementation of its tiered pricing
structure is to exclude from the
calculation of ADV and TCV all days
where the Exchange experiences an
Exchange Outage.
The Exchange believes that
eliminating days where the Exchange
experiences an Exchange Outage from
the definition of ADV and TCV, and
thereby eliminating that day from the
calculation as it relates to rebates and
fees based on trading activity on the
Exchange, will help to eliminate
significant uncertainty faced by
Members as to their monthly ADV as a
percentage of average daily TCV and the
rebates and fees that this percentage will
qualify for, providing Members with an
increased certainty as to their monthly
cost for trades executed on the
Exchange.
The Exchange notes that it recently
adopted changes to exclude the last
Friday of June from the calculation of
ADV and average daily TCV.8 The last
8 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 69794
(June 18, 2013), 78 FR 37868 (SR–BYX–2013–021)
(notice of filing and immediate effectiveness of
proposed rule change to exclude the Russell
Reconstitution day from the calculation of ADV and
TCV for purposes of BYX tiered pricing).
PO 00000
Frm 00326
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
day of June is the day that Russell
Investments reconstitutes its family of
indexes (‘‘Russell Reconstitution’’),
resulting in particularly high trading
volumes, much of which the Exchange
believes derives from market
participants who are not generally as
active entering the market to rebalance
their holdings in-line with the Russell
Reconstitution. Similar to the current
proposal, the Exchange completely
excludes Russell Reconstitution days
from the calculation of ADV and average
daily TCV.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the requirements of the Act and the
rules and regulations thereunder that
are applicable to a national securities
exchange, and, in particular, with the
requirements of Section 6 of the Act.9
Specifically, the Exchange believes that
the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,10 in that
it provides for the equitable allocation
of reasonable dues, fees and other
charges among members and other
persons using any facility or system
which the Exchange operates or
controls. The Exchange notes that it
operates in a highly competitive market
in which market participants can
readily direct order flow to competing
venues if they deem fee structures at a
particular venue to be unreasonable
and/or excessive.
With respect to the proposed changes
to the tiered pricing structure for
removing liquidity from the Exchange
and adding liquidity to the Exchange,
the Exchange believes that its proposal
is reasonable because, as explained
above, it will help provide Members
with a greater level of certainty as to
their level of rebates and costs for
trading in any month where the
Exchange experiences an Exchange
Outage on one or more trading days.
The Exchange also believes that its
proposal is reasonable because it is not
changing the thresholds to become
eligible or the dollar value associated
with the tiered rebates or fees and,
moreover, by eliminating the inclusion
of a trading day that would almost
certainly lower a Member’s ADV as a
percentage of average daily TCV, it will
make the majority of Members more
likely to meet the minimum or higher
tier thresholds, which will provide
additional incentive to Members to
increase their participation on the
Exchange in order to meet the next tier.
In addition, the Exchange believes that
9 15
U.S.C. 78f.
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
10 15
E:\FR\FM\22OCN1.SGM
22OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 22, 2013 / Notices
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with FRONT MATTER
the proposed changes to fees are
equitably allocated among Exchange
constituents as the methodology for
calculating ADV and TCV will apply
equally to all Members. While, although
unlikely, certain Members may have a
higher ADV as a percentage of average
daily TCV with their activity included
from days where the Exchange has an
Exchange Outage, the proposal will
make all Members’ cost of trading on the
Exchange more predictable, regardless
of how the proposal affects their ADV as
a percentage of average daily TCV.
Volume-based tiers such as the
liquidity removing and adding tiers
maintained by the Exchange have been
widely adopted in the equities markets,
and are equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because they are open to
all members on an equal basis and
provide higher rebates or lower fees that
are reasonably related to the value to an
exchange’s market quality associated
with higher levels of market activity,
such as higher levels of liquidity
provision and introduction of higher
volumes of orders into the price and
volume discovery process. Accordingly,
the Exchange believes that the proposal
is equitably allocated and not unfairly
discriminatory because it is consistent
with the overall goals of enhancing
market quality. Further, the Exchange
believes that a tiered pricing model not
significantly altered by a day of atypical
trading behavior which allows Members
to predictably calculate what their costs
associated with trading activity on the
Exchange will be is reasonable, fair and
equitable and not unreasonably
discriminatory as it is uniform in
application amongst Members and
should enable such participants to
operate their business without concern
of unpredictable and potentially
significant changes in expenses.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
proposed changes will benefit
intermarket competition in that they
will help the Exchange to continue to
incentivize higher levels of liquidity at
a tighter spread while providing more
stable and predictable costs to its
Members. Further, the proposed
changes will help to promote
intramarket competition by avoiding a
penalty to Members for days when
trading on the Exchange is unavailable
for a significant portion of the day. As
stated above, the Exchange notes that it
operates in a highly competitive market
VerDate Mar<15>2010
21:08 Oct 21, 2013
Jkt 232001
in which market participants can
readily direct order flow to competing
venues if the deem fee structures to be
unreasonable or excessive.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 11 and paragraph (f) of Rule
19b–4 thereunder.12 At any time within
60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
BYX–2013–034 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–BYX–2013–034. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
11 15
12 17
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
CFR 240.19b–4(f).
Frm 00327
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
62909
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–BYX–
2013–034 and should be submitted on
or before November 12, 2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.13
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–24659 Filed 10–21–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–70692; File No. SR–CBOE–
2013–098]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change Relating to Continuing
Education
October 16, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on October
4, 2013, the Chicago Board Options
Exchange, Incorporated (the ‘‘Exchange’’
or ‘‘CBOE’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the
‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Exchange filed the
proposal as a ‘‘non-controversial’’
proposed rule change pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 3 and
Rule 19b–4(f)(6) thereunder,4 which
13 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
1 15
E:\FR\FM\22OCN1.SGM
22OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 204 (Tuesday, October 22, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62907-62909]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-24659]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-70666; File No. SR-BYX-2013-034]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; BATS Y-Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Related to
Fees for Use of BATS Y-Exchange, Inc.
October 11, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on September 30, 2013, BATS Y-Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``BYX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Exchange has designated the proposed rule change as one establishing or
changing a member due, fee, or other charge imposed by the Exchange
under Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2)
thereunder,\4\ which renders the
[[Page 62908]]
proposed rule change effective upon filing with the Commission. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the fee schedule applicable to
Members \5\ and non-members of the Exchange pursuant to BYX Rules
15.1(a) and (c). Changes to the fee schedule pursuant to this proposal
are effective upon filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ A Member is any registered broker or dealer that has been
admitted to membership in the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange's
Web site at https://www.batstrading.com, at the principal office of the
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
Exchange proposes to modify its fee schedule effective September
30, 2013, in order to amend the way that the Exchange calculates
rebates for removing liquidity from and fees for adding liquidity to
the Exchange. Specifically, the Exchange is proposing to amend the
methodology by which it determines the rebate that it will provide and
fee it will charge to Members based on the Exchange's tiered pricing
structure by excluding from the calculation of both ADV \6\ and average
daily TCV \7\ any day that trading is not available on the Exchange for
more than sixty (60) minutes during regular trading hours (i.e., 9:30
a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time) but continues on other markets during
such time (an ``Exchange Outage'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ As provided in the fee schedule, ``ADV'' means average daily
volume calculated as the number of shares added or removed,
combined, per day on a monthly basis; routed shares are not included
in ADV calculation.
\7\ As provided in the fee schedule ``TCV'' means total
consolidated volume calculated as the volume reported by all
exchanges and trade reporting facilities to a consolidated
transaction reporting plan for the month for which the fees apply.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange currently offers a tiered structure for determining
the rebates that Members receive for executions that remove liquidity
from the Exchange and the fees that Members are charged for executions
that add liquidity to the Exchange. Under the tiered pricing structure,
the Exchange provides different rebates and charges different fees to
Members based on a Member's ADV as a percentage of average daily TCV.
The Exchange notes that it is not proposing to modify any of the
existing rebates or fees or the percentage thresholds at which a Member
may qualify for certain rebates and fees pursuant to the tiered pricing
structure. Rather, as mentioned above, the Exchange is proposing to
modify its fee schedule in order to exclude trading activity occurring
on any day that the Exchange experiences an Exchange Outage, defined as
an outage lasting for more than sixty (60) minutes, from the
calculation of ADV and average daily TCV. The Exchange believes that
including trading activity on days when trading on the Exchange is
unavailable for a significant portion of the day can unfairly skew the
calculation of ADV and TCV. Thus, the Exchange believes that the most
accurate and fair implementation of its tiered pricing structure is to
exclude from the calculation of ADV and TCV all days where the Exchange
experiences an Exchange Outage.
The Exchange believes that eliminating days where the Exchange
experiences an Exchange Outage from the definition of ADV and TCV, and
thereby eliminating that day from the calculation as it relates to
rebates and fees based on trading activity on the Exchange, will help
to eliminate significant uncertainty faced by Members as to their
monthly ADV as a percentage of average daily TCV and the rebates and
fees that this percentage will qualify for, providing Members with an
increased certainty as to their monthly cost for trades executed on the
Exchange.
The Exchange notes that it recently adopted changes to exclude the
last Friday of June from the calculation of ADV and average daily
TCV.\8\ The last day of June is the day that Russell Investments
reconstitutes its family of indexes (``Russell Reconstitution''),
resulting in particularly high trading volumes, much of which the
Exchange believes derives from market participants who are not
generally as active entering the market to rebalance their holdings in-
line with the Russell Reconstitution. Similar to the current proposal,
the Exchange completely excludes Russell Reconstitution days from the
calculation of ADV and average daily TCV.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 69794 (June 18, 2013),
78 FR 37868 (SR-BYX-2013-021) (notice of filing and immediate
effectiveness of proposed rule change to exclude the Russell
Reconstitution day from the calculation of ADV and TCV for purposes
of BYX tiered pricing).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder that are applicable to a national securities exchange, and,
in particular, with the requirements of Section 6 of the Act.\9\
Specifically, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is
consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\10\ in that it provides for
the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges
among members and other persons using any facility or system which the
Exchange operates or controls. The Exchange notes that it operates in a
highly competitive market in which market participants can readily
direct order flow to competing venues if they deem fee structures at a
particular venue to be unreasonable and/or excessive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
With respect to the proposed changes to the tiered pricing
structure for removing liquidity from the Exchange and adding liquidity
to the Exchange, the Exchange believes that its proposal is reasonable
because, as explained above, it will help provide Members with a
greater level of certainty as to their level of rebates and costs for
trading in any month where the Exchange experiences an Exchange Outage
on one or more trading days. The Exchange also believes that its
proposal is reasonable because it is not changing the thresholds to
become eligible or the dollar value associated with the tiered rebates
or fees and, moreover, by eliminating the inclusion of a trading day
that would almost certainly lower a Member's ADV as a percentage of
average daily TCV, it will make the majority of Members more likely to
meet the minimum or higher tier thresholds, which will provide
additional incentive to Members to increase their participation on the
Exchange in order to meet the next tier. In addition, the Exchange
believes that
[[Page 62909]]
the proposed changes to fees are equitably allocated among Exchange
constituents as the methodology for calculating ADV and TCV will apply
equally to all Members. While, although unlikely, certain Members may
have a higher ADV as a percentage of average daily TCV with their
activity included from days where the Exchange has an Exchange Outage,
the proposal will make all Members' cost of trading on the Exchange
more predictable, regardless of how the proposal affects their ADV as a
percentage of average daily TCV.
Volume-based tiers such as the liquidity removing and adding tiers
maintained by the Exchange have been widely adopted in the equities
markets, and are equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because they
are open to all members on an equal basis and provide higher rebates or
lower fees that are reasonably related to the value to an exchange's
market quality associated with higher levels of market activity, such
as higher levels of liquidity provision and introduction of higher
volumes of orders into the price and volume discovery process.
Accordingly, the Exchange believes that the proposal is equitably
allocated and not unfairly discriminatory because it is consistent with
the overall goals of enhancing market quality. Further, the Exchange
believes that a tiered pricing model not significantly altered by a day
of atypical trading behavior which allows Members to predictably
calculate what their costs associated with trading activity on the
Exchange will be is reasonable, fair and equitable and not unreasonably
discriminatory as it is uniform in application amongst Members and
should enable such participants to operate their business without
concern of unpredictable and potentially significant changes in
expenses.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed changes will
benefit intermarket competition in that they will help the Exchange to
continue to incentivize higher levels of liquidity at a tighter spread
while providing more stable and predictable costs to its Members.
Further, the proposed changes will help to promote intramarket
competition by avoiding a penalty to Members for days when trading on
the Exchange is unavailable for a significant portion of the day. As
stated above, the Exchange notes that it operates in a highly
competitive market in which market participants can readily direct
order flow to competing venues if the deem fee structures to be
unreasonable or excessive.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \11\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4
thereunder.\12\ At any time within 60 days of the filing of the
proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend
such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
\12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-BYX-2013-034 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BYX-2013-034. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-BYX-2013-034 and should be
submitted on or before November 12, 2013.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-24659 Filed 10-21-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P