Self-Regulatory Organizations; BATS Y-Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Rule 12.6 To Conform to FINRA Rule 5320 Relating to Trading Ahead of Customer Orders, 62896-62899 [2013-24656]

Download as PDF 62896 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 22, 2013 / Notices been filed with the Commission and are available on the Commission’s Web site. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Advance Notice and Timing for Commission Action The clearing agency may implement the proposed change pursuant to Section 806(e)(1)(G) of the Clearing Supervision Act 12 if it has not received an objection to the proposed change within 60 days of the later of (i) the date that the Commission received the advance notice or (ii) the date the Commission receives any further information it requested for consideration of the notice. The clearing agency shall not implement the proposed change if the Commission has any objection to the proposed change. The Commission may extend the period for review by an additional 60 days if the proposed change raises novel or complex issues, subject to the Commission providing the clearing agency with prompt written notice of the extension. A proposed change may be implemented in less than 60 days from the date of receipt of the advance notice, or the date the Commission receives any further information it requested, if the Commission notifies the clearing agency in writing that it does not object to the proposed change and authorizes the clearing agency to implement the proposed change on an earlier date, subject to any conditions imposed by the Commission. The clearing agency shall post notice on its Web site of proposed changes that are implemented. The proposal shall not take effect until all regulatory actions required with respect to the proposal are completed. IV. Solicitation of Comments sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with FRONT MATTER Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the Advance Notice, as modified by Amendment No. 3, is consistent with the Clearing Supervision Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File No. SR–NSCC–2013–802. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the Advance Notice, as amended, that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the Advance Notice, as amended, between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filings also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of NSCC and on NSCC’s Web site at https://dtcc.com/legal/rule_filings/ nscc/2013.php. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File No. SR–NSCC– 2013–802 and should be submitted on or before November 5, 2013. By the Commission. Kevin M. O’Neill, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2013–24678 Filed 10–21–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rule-comments@ sec.gov. Please include File No. SR– NSCC–2013–802 on the subject line. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–70663; File No. SR–BYX– 2013–036] Self-Regulatory Organizations; BATS Y-Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Rule 12.6 To Conform to FINRA Rule 5320 Relating to Trading Ahead of Customer Orders October 11, 2013. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on October 3, 2013, BATS Y-Exchange, Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘BYX’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange filed a proposal to amend Rule 12.6 to make it substantially the same as Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (‘‘FINRA’’) Rule 5320. The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange’s Web site at https://www.batstrading.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such statements. 1 15 12 12 U.S.C. 5465(e)(1)(G). VerDate Mar<15>2010 21:08 Oct 21, 2013 2 17 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00314 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22OCN1.SGM U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). CFR 240.19b–4. 22OCN1 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 22, 2013 / Notices A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 12.6, which limits trading ahead of customer orders by Members,3 to make the rule substantially the same as FINRA Rule 5320.4 As with FINRA Rule 5320, amended Rule 12.6 would prohibit Members from trading ahead of customer orders, subject to specified exceptions. The amended rule would include exceptions for large orders and institutional accounts, proprietary transactions effected by a trading unit of a Member with no knowledge of customer orders held by another trading unit of the Member, riskless principal transactions, intermarket sweep orders (‘‘ISOs’’), and odd lot and bona fide error transactions, discussed in detail below. Amended Rule 12.6 would also provide the same guidance as FINRA Rule 5320 on minimum price improvement standards, order handling procedures, and trading outside normal market hours. Exceptions Amended Rule 12.6 would include exceptions to the prohibition against trading ahead of customer orders. That is, a Member that meets the conditions of an exception would be permitted to trade a security on the same side of the market for its own account at a price that would satisfy a customer order in certain circumstances. The exceptions are set out below. Large Orders and Institutional Accounts Proposal To Adopt Text of FINRA Rule 5320 To harmonize its rules with FINRA, the Exchange proposes to delete the current text of Rule 12.6 and its supplementary material and adopt the text and supplementary material of FINRA Rule 5320, with certain technical changes, as Rule 12.6. FINRA Rule 5320 generally provides that a FINRA member that accepts and holds an order in an equity security from its own customer, or a customer of another broker-dealer, without immediately executing the order is prohibited from One exception would permit a Member to negotiate terms and conditions with respect to the acceptance of certain large-sized orders (orders of 10,000 shares or more unless such orders are less than $100,000 in value) or orders from institutional accounts. The term ‘‘institutional account’’ will be defined in accordance with FINRA Rule 4512(c). That is, an institutional account will be defined as the account of: (1) A bank savings and loan association, insurance company or registered investment company; (2) an investment adviser registered either with the SEC under Section 203 of the Investment Advisers Act or with a state securities commission (or any agency or office performing like functions); or (3) any other person (whether a natural person, corporation, partnership, trust or otherwise) with total assets of at least $50 million. This exception would require the Member to provide clear and comprehensive written disclosure to each customer at account opening and annually thereafter that: (a) States that the Member may trade proprietarily at prices that would satisfy the customer order, and (b) provides the customer with a meaningful opportunity to opt in to the Rule 12.6 protections with respect to all or any portion of its order. If a customer does not opt in to the protections with respect to all or any portion of its order, the Member may reasonably conclude that such customer has consented to the Member trading a security on the same side of the market for its own account at a price that would satisfy the customer’s order.5 3 Members are registered brokers or dealers that have been admitted to membership at the Exchange. BYX Rule 1.5(n). 4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 63895 (February 11, 2011), 76 FR 9386 (February 17, 2011) (SR–FINRA–2009–90). 5 A customer would retain the right to withdraw consent at any time. Therefore, a Member’s reasonable conclusion that a customer has consented to the Member trading along with such customer’s order is subject to further instruction and modification from the customer. Background Current Rule 12.6, the customer order protection rule, generally prohibits Members from trading on a proprietary basis ahead of, or along with, customer orders that are executable at the same price as the proprietary order. The rule contains several exceptions that make it permissible for a Member to enter a proprietary order while representing a customer order that could be executed at the same price, including permitting transactions for the purposes of facilitating the execution, on a riskless principal basis, of one or more customer orders. sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with FRONT MATTER trading that security on the same side of the market for its own account at a price that would satisfy the customer order, unless it immediately thereafter executes the customer order up to the size and at the same or better price at which it traded for its own account. VerDate Mar<15>2010 21:08 Oct 21, 2013 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00315 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 62897 In lieu of providing written disclosure to customers at account opening and annually thereafter, the proposed rule would permit Members to provide clear and comprehensive oral disclosure to, and obtain consent from, a customer on an order-by-order basis. The Member would be required to document who provided such consent and that such consent evidences the customer’s understanding of the terms and conditions of the order. If a customer opted in to the Rule 12.6 protections, a Member could still obtain consent on an order-by-order basis to trade ahead of or along with an order from that customer, provided that the Member documented who provided such consent and that such consent evidenced the customer’s understanding of the terms and conditions of the order. No-Knowledge Exception The Exchange is also proposing to include in Interpretation and Policy .02 a ‘‘no-knowledge’’ exception to its customer order protection rule. The proposed exception would allow one trading unit of a Member to trade in a proprietary capacity and at prices that would satisfy customer orders held by another, separate trading unit of the Member. The No-Knowledge Exception would be applicable with respect to NMS stocks, as defined in Rule 600 of Regulation NMS under the Act. To avail itself of the No-Knowledge Exception, a Member would be required to meet certain conditions. First, it would have to implement and utilize an effective system of internal controls (such as appropriate information barriers) that operate to prevent the proprietary trading unit from obtaining knowledge of the customer orders held by a separate trading unit. As proposed, Interpretation and Policy .02 will make clear that appropriate information barriers must, at a minimum, comply with the Exchange’s existing requirements regarding the prevention of the misuse of material, non-public information, which are set forth in Exchange Rule 5.5. Second, the Member would have to provide, at account opening and annually thereafter, a written description of how it handles customer orders and the circumstances under which it may trade proprietarily, including in a market-making capacity, at prices that would satisfy the customer order. A Member must maintain records indicating which orders rely on the noknowledge exception and produce these records to the Exchange upon request. The onus will be on the Member to produce sufficient documentation justifying reliance on the No-Knowledge Exception for any given trade. To ensure E:\FR\FM\22OCN1.SGM 22OCN1 62898 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 22, 2013 / Notices clarity and transparency regarding this exception and others, the Exchange will be issuing a regulatory notice informing Members of these proposed rule changes. The Exchange will include in the regulatory notice the effective date for the rule as amended, which shall be at least 30 days after the approval of the amendments to Rule 12.6 in order to allow Members to make any necessary changes to their internal policies or processes. Riskless Principal Exception Amended Rule 12.6 would not apply to a proprietary trade made by the Member to facilitate the execution, on a riskless principal basis, of another order from a customer (whether its own customer or the customer of another broker-dealer). To take advantage of this exception, the Member would have to: (a) Submit a report, contemporaneously with the execution of the facilitated order, identifying the trade as riskless principal to the Exchange, and (b) have written policies and procedures to ensure that riskless principal transactions relied upon for this exception comply with applicable Exchange rules. At a minimum, these policies and procedures would have to require: (1) Receipt of the customer order before execution of the offsetting principal transaction, and (2) execution of the offsetting principal transaction at the same price as the customer order, exclusive of any markup or markdown, commission equivalent, or other fee and allocation to a riskless principal or customer account in a consistent manner and within 60 seconds of execution. Members would have to have supervisory systems in place that produce records that enable the Member and the Exchange to reconstruct accurately, readily, and in a timesequenced manner all orders on which a Member relies in claiming this exception. sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with FRONT MATTER ISO Exception The proposed rule change would also exempt a Member from the obligation to execute a customer order in a manner consistent with Rule 12.6 with regard to trading for its own account when the Member routed an ISO in compliance with Rule 600(b)(30)(ii) of Regulation NMS if the customer order is received after the Member routed the ISO. If a Member routes an ISO to facilitate a customer order, and that customer has consented to not receiving the better prices obtained by the ISO, the Member would also be exempt with respect to any trading for its own account that is VerDate Mar<15>2010 21:08 Oct 21, 2013 Jkt 232001 the result of the ISO with respect to the consenting customer’s order. Odd Lot and Bona Fide Error Exception The Exchange proposes to except a Member’s proprietary trade that: (1) Offsets a customer odd lot order (i.e., an order less than one round lot, which is typically 100 shares), or (2) corrects a bona fide error. With respect to bona fide errors, the Member would be required to demonstrate and document the basis upon which a transaction meets the bona fide error exception. For purposes of this proposed Rule, the Exchange will adopt the definition of ‘‘bona fide error’’ found in Regulation NMS’s exemption for error correction transactions.6 Thus, a bona fide error is: (i) The inaccurate conveyance or execution of any term of an order including, but not limited to, price, number of shares or other unit of trading; identification of the security; identification of the account for which securities are purchased or sold; lost or otherwise misplaced order tickets; short sales that were instead sold long or vice versa; or the execution of an order on the wrong side of a market; (ii) the unauthorized or unintended purchase sale or allocation of securities or the failure to follow specific client instructions; (iii) the incorrect entry of data into relevant systems, including reliance on incorrect cash positions, withdrawals, or securities positions reflected in an account; or (iv) a delay, outage, or failure of a communication system used to transmit market data prices or to facilitate the delivery or execution of an order. 7 Minimum Price Improvement Standards The proposed rule change establishes the minimum amount of price improvement necessary for a Member to execute an order on a proprietary basis when holding an unexecuted limit order in that same security without being required to execute the held limit order. In addition, if the minimum price improvement standards set forth in proposed Interpretation and Policy .06, paragraphs (a) through (g) would trigger the protection of a pending customer limit order, any better-priced customer limit order(s) must also be protected under this Rule, even if those betterpriced limit orders would not be directly triggered under these minimum price improvement standards. 6 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55884 (June 8, 2007), 72 FR 32926, 32927 (June 14, 2007) (Order Exempting Certain Error Correction Transactions from Rule 611 of Regulation NMS under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). 7 Id. PO 00000 Frm 00316 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Order Handling Procedures The proposed rule change provides that a Member must make every effort to execute a marketable customer order that it receives fully and promptly. A Member holding a marketable customer order that has not been immediately executed would have to make every effort to cross such order with any other order received by the Member on the other side of the market, up to the size of such order at a price that is no less than the best bid and no greater than the best offer at the time that the subsequent order is received by the Member and that is consistent with the terms of the orders. If a Member were holding multiple orders on both sides of the market that have not been executed, the Member would have to make every effort to cross or otherwise execute such orders in a manner reasonable and consistent with the objectives of the proposed Rule and with the terms of the orders. A Member could satisfy the crossing requirement by contemporaneously buying from the seller and selling to the buyer at the same price. Trading Outside Normal Market Hours Under the proposed amendments to Rule 12.6, a Member generally could limit the life of a customer order to the period of normal market hours of 9:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time. However, if the customer and Member agreed to the processing of the customer’s order outside normal market hours, the protections of amended Rule 12.6 would apply to that customer’s order at all times the customer order is executable by the Member. 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act 8 in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act 9 in particular, in that it is designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. The Exchange believes that amending the rule to conform to FINRA Rule 5320 will contribute to investor protection by defining important parameters by which Members must abide when trading proprietarily while holding customer limit and market orders, and foster 8 15 9 15 E:\FR\FM\22OCN1.SGM U.S.C. 78f(b). U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). 22OCN1 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 22, 2013 / Notices cooperation by harmonizing requirements across self-regulatory organizations. The Exchange also believes that including this rule will reinforce the importance of and ensure that Members are aware of these requirements. B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. To the contrary, the Exchange believes that the proposal enhances cooperation among markets and other trading venues to promote fair and orderly markets and to protect the interests of the public and of investors. Specifically, by aligning the Exchange’s customer protection rules with those of FINRA and other exchanges,10 the proposed rule change will reduce the complexity of the customer order protection rules for those Members that are also subject to the customer order protection rules of FINRA and other exchanges. As a result, the proposed rule will help assure the protection of customer orders without imposing undue regulatory costs on industry participants. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others The Exchange has neither solicited nor received written comments on the proposed rule change. sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with FRONT MATTER III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or 10 See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No. 64418 (May 6, 2011), 76 FR 27735 (May 12, 2011) (SR–CHX–2011–08) (notice of filing and immediate effectiveness of proposed rule change of Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc. to adopt customer order protection language consistent with FINRA Rule 5320); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 65165 (August 18, 2011), 76 FR 53009 (August 24, 2011) (SR–NYSEAmex–2011–059) (notice of filing and immediate effectiveness of proposed rule change of NYSE Amex LLC (now known as NYSE MKT LLC) to adopt customer order protection language that is substantially the same as FINRA Rule 5320); and Securities Exchange Act Release No. 65166 (August 18, 2011), 76 FR 53012 (August 24, 2011) (SR– NYSEArca–2011–057) (notice of filing and immediate effectiveness of proposed rule change of NYSE Arca, Inc. to adopt customer order protection language that is substantially the same as FINRA Rule 5320). VerDate Mar<15>2010 21:08 Oct 21, 2013 Jkt 232001 (ii) as to which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will: (A) By order approve or disapprove the proposed rule change, or (B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rule-comments@ sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–BYX–2013–036 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–BYX–2013–036. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal offices of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–BYX– PO 00000 Frm 00317 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 62899 2013–036, and should be submitted on or before November 12, 2013. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.11 Kevin M. O’Neill, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2013–24656 Filed 10–21–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–70657; File No. SR–ISE– 2013–51] Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Exchange, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Schedule of Fees October 10, 2013. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that, on September 30, 2013, the International Securities Exchange, LLC (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or the ‘‘ISE’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission the proposed rule change, as described in Items I, II, and III below, which items have been prepared by the selfregulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The ISE proposes to amend its Schedule of Fees to permit ISE to exclude from its average daily volume calculations any trading day on which the Exchange is closed for trading due to early closing or a market-wide trading halt, and to correct a reference to ISE rules in the ‘‘Flash Order’’ definition. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange’s Web site (https://www.ise.com), at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change 11 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 1 15 E:\FR\FM\22OCN1.SGM 22OCN1

Agencies

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 204 (Tuesday, October 22, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62896-62899]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-24656]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-70663; File No. SR-BYX-2013-036]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; BATS Y-Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Rule 12.6 To Conform to FINRA
Rule 5320 Relating to Trading Ahead of Customer Orders

October 11, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on October 3, 2013, BATS Y-Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``BYX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

The Exchange filed a proposal to amend Rule 12.6 to make it
substantially the same as Financial Industry Regulatory Authority
(``FINRA'') Rule 5320.
The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange's
Web site at https://www.batstrading.com, at the principal office of the
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such
statements.

[[Page 62897]]

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 12.6, which limits trading
ahead of customer orders by Members,\3\ to make the rule substantially
the same as FINRA Rule 5320.\4\ As with FINRA Rule 5320, amended Rule
12.6 would prohibit Members from trading ahead of customer orders,
subject to specified exceptions. The amended rule would include
exceptions for large orders and institutional accounts, proprietary
transactions effected by a trading unit of a Member with no knowledge
of customer orders held by another trading unit of the Member, riskless
principal transactions, intermarket sweep orders (``ISOs''), and odd
lot and bona fide error transactions, discussed in detail below.
Amended Rule 12.6 would also provide the same guidance as FINRA Rule
5320 on minimum price improvement standards, order handling procedures,
and trading outside normal market hours.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\3\ Members are registered brokers or dealers that have been
admitted to membership at the Exchange. BYX Rule 1.5(n).
\4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 63895 (February 11,
2011), 76 FR 9386 (February 17, 2011) (SR-FINRA-2009-90).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background
Current Rule 12.6, the customer order protection rule, generally
prohibits Members from trading on a proprietary basis ahead of, or
along with, customer orders that are executable at the same price as
the proprietary order. The rule contains several exceptions that make
it permissible for a Member to enter a proprietary order while
representing a customer order that could be executed at the same price,
including permitting transactions for the purposes of facilitating the
execution, on a riskless principal basis, of one or more customer
orders.
Proposal To Adopt Text of FINRA Rule 5320
To harmonize its rules with FINRA, the Exchange proposes to delete
the current text of Rule 12.6 and its supplementary material and adopt
the text and supplementary material of FINRA Rule 5320, with certain
technical changes, as Rule 12.6. FINRA Rule 5320 generally provides
that a FINRA member that accepts and holds an order in an equity
security from its own customer, or a customer of another broker-dealer,
without immediately executing the order is prohibited from trading that
security on the same side of the market for its own account at a price
that would satisfy the customer order, unless it immediately thereafter
executes the customer order up to the size and at the same or better
price at which it traded for its own account.
Exceptions
Amended Rule 12.6 would include exceptions to the prohibition
against trading ahead of customer orders. That is, a Member that meets
the conditions of an exception would be permitted to trade a security
on the same side of the market for its own account at a price that
would satisfy a customer order in certain circumstances. The exceptions
are set out below.
Large Orders and Institutional Accounts
One exception would permit a Member to negotiate terms and
conditions with respect to the acceptance of certain large-sized orders
(orders of 10,000 shares or more unless such orders are less than
$100,000 in value) or orders from institutional accounts. The term
``institutional account'' will be defined in accordance with FINRA Rule
4512(c). That is, an institutional account will be defined as the
account of: (1) A bank savings and loan association, insurance company
or registered investment company; (2) an investment adviser registered
either with the SEC under Section 203 of the Investment Advisers Act or
with a state securities commission (or any agency or office performing
like functions); or (3) any other person (whether a natural person,
corporation, partnership, trust or otherwise) with total assets of at
least $50 million. This exception would require the Member to provide
clear and comprehensive written disclosure to each customer at account
opening and annually thereafter that: (a) States that the Member may
trade proprietarily at prices that would satisfy the customer order,
and (b) provides the customer with a meaningful opportunity to opt in
to the Rule 12.6 protections with respect to all or any portion of its
order. If a customer does not opt in to the protections with respect to
all or any portion of its order, the Member may reasonably conclude
that such customer has consented to the Member trading a security on
the same side of the market for its own account at a price that would
satisfy the customer's order.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\5\ A customer would retain the right to withdraw consent at any
time. Therefore, a Member's reasonable conclusion that a customer
has consented to the Member trading along with such customer's order
is subject to further instruction and modification from the
customer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

In lieu of providing written disclosure to customers at account
opening and annually thereafter, the proposed rule would permit Members
to provide clear and comprehensive oral disclosure to, and obtain
consent from, a customer on an order-by-order basis. The Member would
be required to document who provided such consent and that such consent
evidences the customer's understanding of the terms and conditions of
the order. If a customer opted in to the Rule 12.6 protections, a
Member could still obtain consent on an order-by-order basis to trade
ahead of or along with an order from that customer, provided that the
Member documented who provided such consent and that such consent
evidenced the customer's understanding of the terms and conditions of
the order.
No-Knowledge Exception
The Exchange is also proposing to include in Interpretation and
Policy .02 a ``no-knowledge'' exception to its customer order
protection rule. The proposed exception would allow one trading unit of
a Member to trade in a proprietary capacity and at prices that would
satisfy customer orders held by another, separate trading unit of the
Member. The No-Knowledge Exception would be applicable with respect to
NMS stocks, as defined in Rule 600 of Regulation NMS under the Act.
To avail itself of the No-Knowledge Exception, a Member would be
required to meet certain conditions. First, it would have to implement
and utilize an effective system of internal controls (such as
appropriate information barriers) that operate to prevent the
proprietary trading unit from obtaining knowledge of the customer
orders held by a separate trading unit. As proposed, Interpretation and
Policy .02 will make clear that appropriate information barriers must,
at a minimum, comply with the Exchange's existing requirements
regarding the prevention of the misuse of material, non-public
information, which are set forth in Exchange Rule 5.5. Second, the
Member would have to provide, at account opening and annually
thereafter, a written description of how it handles customer orders and
the circumstances under which it may trade proprietarily, including in
a market-making capacity, at prices that would satisfy the customer
order. A Member must maintain records indicating which orders rely on
the no-knowledge exception and produce these records to the Exchange
upon request. The onus will be on the Member to produce sufficient
documentation justifying reliance on the No-Knowledge Exception for any
given trade. To ensure

[[Page 62898]]

clarity and transparency regarding this exception and others, the
Exchange will be issuing a regulatory notice informing Members of these
proposed rule changes. The Exchange will include in the regulatory
notice the effective date for the rule as amended, which shall be at
least 30 days after the approval of the amendments to Rule 12.6 in
order to allow Members to make any necessary changes to their internal
policies or processes.
Riskless Principal Exception
Amended Rule 12.6 would not apply to a proprietary trade made by
the Member to facilitate the execution, on a riskless principal basis,
of another order from a customer (whether its own customer or the
customer of another broker-dealer). To take advantage of this
exception, the Member would have to: (a) Submit a report,
contemporaneously with the execution of the facilitated order,
identifying the trade as riskless principal to the Exchange, and (b)
have written policies and procedures to ensure that riskless principal
transactions relied upon for this exception comply with applicable
Exchange rules. At a minimum, these policies and procedures would have
to require: (1) Receipt of the customer order before execution of the
offsetting principal transaction, and (2) execution of the offsetting
principal transaction at the same price as the customer order,
exclusive of any markup or markdown, commission equivalent, or other
fee and allocation to a riskless principal or customer account in a
consistent manner and within 60 seconds of execution.
Members would have to have supervisory systems in place that
produce records that enable the Member and the Exchange to reconstruct
accurately, readily, and in a time-sequenced manner all orders on which
a Member relies in claiming this exception.
ISO Exception
The proposed rule change would also exempt a Member from the
obligation to execute a customer order in a manner consistent with Rule
12.6 with regard to trading for its own account when the Member routed
an ISO in compliance with Rule 600(b)(30)(ii) of Regulation NMS if the
customer order is received after the Member routed the ISO. If a Member
routes an ISO to facilitate a customer order, and that customer has
consented to not receiving the better prices obtained by the ISO, the
Member would also be exempt with respect to any trading for its own
account that is the result of the ISO with respect to the consenting
customer's order.
Odd Lot and Bona Fide Error Exception
The Exchange proposes to except a Member's proprietary trade that:
(1) Offsets a customer odd lot order (i.e., an order less than one
round lot, which is typically 100 shares), or (2) corrects a bona fide
error. With respect to bona fide errors, the Member would be required
to demonstrate and document the basis upon which a transaction meets
the bona fide error exception. For purposes of this proposed Rule, the
Exchange will adopt the definition of ``bona fide error'' found in
Regulation NMS's exemption for error correction transactions.\6\ Thus,
a bona fide error is:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\6\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55884 (June 8, 2007), 72
FR 32926, 32927 (June 14, 2007) (Order Exempting Certain Error
Correction Transactions from Rule 611 of Regulation NMS under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(i) The inaccurate conveyance or execution of any term of an order
including, but not limited to, price, number of shares or other unit of
trading; identification of the security; identification of the account
for which securities are purchased or sold; lost or otherwise misplaced
order tickets; short sales that were instead sold long or vice versa;
or the execution of an order on the wrong side of a market; (ii) the
unauthorized or unintended purchase sale or allocation of securities or
the failure to follow specific client instructions; (iii) the incorrect
entry of data into relevant systems, including reliance on incorrect
cash positions, withdrawals, or securities positions reflected in an
account; or (iv) a delay, outage, or failure of a communication system
used to transmit market data prices or to facilitate the delivery or
execution of an order. \7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\7\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Minimum Price Improvement Standards
The proposed rule change establishes the minimum amount of price
improvement necessary for a Member to execute an order on a proprietary
basis when holding an unexecuted limit order in that same security
without being required to execute the held limit order.
In addition, if the minimum price improvement standards set forth
in proposed Interpretation and Policy .06, paragraphs (a) through (g)
would trigger the protection of a pending customer limit order, any
better-priced customer limit order(s) must also be protected under this
Rule, even if those better-priced limit orders would not be directly
triggered under these minimum price improvement standards.
Order Handling Procedures
The proposed rule change provides that a Member must make every
effort to execute a marketable customer order that it receives fully
and promptly. A Member holding a marketable customer order that has not
been immediately executed would have to make every effort to cross such
order with any other order received by the Member on the other side of
the market, up to the size of such order at a price that is no less
than the best bid and no greater than the best offer at the time that
the subsequent order is received by the Member and that is consistent
with the terms of the orders. If a Member were holding multiple orders
on both sides of the market that have not been executed, the Member
would have to make every effort to cross or otherwise execute such
orders in a manner reasonable and consistent with the objectives of the
proposed Rule and with the terms of the orders. A Member could satisfy
the crossing requirement by contemporaneously buying from the seller
and selling to the buyer at the same price.
Trading Outside Normal Market Hours
Under the proposed amendments to Rule 12.6, a Member generally
could limit the life of a customer order to the period of normal market
hours of 9:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time. However, if the customer
and Member agreed to the processing of the customer's order outside
normal market hours, the protections of amended Rule 12.6 would apply
to that customer's order at all times the customer order is executable
by the Member.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act \8\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act \9\ in particular, in that it is designed to promote
just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market and a national market system and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest. The Exchange believes that
amending the rule to conform to FINRA Rule 5320 will contribute to
investor protection by defining important parameters by which Members
must abide when trading proprietarily while holding customer limit and
market orders, and foster

[[Page 62899]]

cooperation by harmonizing requirements across self-regulatory
organizations. The Exchange also believes that including this rule will
reinforce the importance of and ensure that Members are aware of these
requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. To the contrary, the Exchange
believes that the proposal enhances cooperation among markets and other
trading venues to promote fair and orderly markets and to protect the
interests of the public and of investors. Specifically, by aligning the
Exchange's customer protection rules with those of FINRA and other
exchanges,\10\ the proposed rule change will reduce the complexity of
the customer order protection rules for those Members that are also
subject to the customer order protection rules of FINRA and other
exchanges. As a result, the proposed rule will help assure the
protection of customer orders without imposing undue regulatory costs
on industry participants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\10\ See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No. 64418 (May
6, 2011), 76 FR 27735 (May 12, 2011) (SR-CHX-2011-08) (notice of
filing and immediate effectiveness of proposed rule change of
Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc. to adopt customer order protection
language consistent with FINRA Rule 5320); Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 65165 (August 18, 2011), 76 FR 53009 (August 24, 2011)
(SR-NYSEAmex-2011-059) (notice of filing and immediate effectiveness
of proposed rule change of NYSE Amex LLC (now known as NYSE MKT LLC)
to adopt customer order protection language that is substantially
the same as FINRA Rule 5320); and Securities Exchange Act Release
No. 65166 (August 18, 2011), 76 FR 53012 (August 24, 2011) (SR-
NYSEArca-2011-057) (notice of filing and immediate effectiveness of
proposed rule change of NYSE Arca, Inc. to adopt customer order
protection language that is substantially the same as FINRA Rule
5320).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

The Exchange has neither solicited nor received written comments on
the proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
(A) By order approve or disapprove the proposed rule change, or
(B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-BYX-2013-036 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BYX-2013-036. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal offices of the Exchange.
All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission
does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You
should submit only information that you wish to make available
publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BYX-2013-036,
and should be submitted on or before November 12, 2013.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-24656 Filed 10-21-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.