Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity to Request Administrative Review, 60847-60849 [2013-23955]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2013 / Notices
section 751(c) of the Act and published
pursuant to section 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: September 25, 2013.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013–23979 Filed 10–1–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation; Opportunity to Request
Administrative Review
Enforcement and Compliance,
formerly Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD
Operations, Customs Liaison Unit,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202)
482–4735.
AGENCY:
Background
Each year during the anniversary
month of the publication of an
antidumping or countervailing duty
order, finding, or suspended
investigation, an interested party, as
defined in section 771(9) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’),
may request, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.213, that the Department of
Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) conduct
an administrative review of that
antidumping or countervailing duty
order, finding, or suspended
investigation.
All deadlines for the submission of
comments or actions by the Department
discussed below refer to the number of
calendar days from the applicable
starting date.
Respondent Selection
In the event the Department limits the
number of respondents for individual
examination for administrative reviews
initiated pursuant to requests made for
the orders identified below, the
Department intends to select
respondents based on U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) data for U.S.
imports during the period of review. We
intend to release the CBP data under
Administrative Protective Order
(‘‘APO’’) to all parties having an APO
within five days of publication of the
initiation notice and to make our
decision regarding respondent selection
within 21 days of publication of the
initiation Federal Register notice.
Therefore, we encourage all parties
interested in commenting on respondent
selection to submit their APO
applications on the date of publication
of the initiation notice, or as soon
thereafter as possible. The Department
invites comments regarding the CBP
data and respondent selection within
five days of placement of the CBP data
on the record of the review.
In the event the Department decides
it is necessary to limit individual
examination of respondents and
conduct respondent selection under
section 777A(c)(2) of the Act:
In general, the Department has found
that determinations concerning whether
particular companies should be
‘‘collapsed’’ (i.e., treated as a single
entity for purposes of calculating
antidumping duty rates) require a
substantial amount of detailed
information and analysis, which often
require follow-up questions and
analysis. Accordingly, the Department
will not conduct collapsing analyses at
the respondent selection phase of this
review and will not collapse companies
at the respondent selection phase unless
there has been a determination to
collapse certain companies in a
previous segment of this antidumping
proceeding (i.e., investigation,
administrative review, new shipper
review or changed circumstances
review). For any company subject to this
review, if the Department determined,
or continued to treat, that company as
collapsed with others, the Department
will assume that such companies
continue to operate in the same manner
and will collapse them for respondent
selection purposes. Otherwise, the
Department will not collapse companies
for purposes of respondent selection.
Parties are requested to (a) identify
which companies subject to review
60847
previously were collapsed, and (b)
provide a citation to the proceeding in
which they were collapsed. Further, if
companies are requested to complete
the Quantity and Value Questionnaire
for purposes of respondent selection, in
general each company must report
volume and value data separately for
itself. Parties should not include data
for any other party, even if they believe
they should be treated as a single entity
with that other party. If a company was
collapsed with another company or
companies in the most recently
completed segment of this proceeding
where the Department considered
collapsing that entity, complete quantity
and value data for that collapsed entity
must be submitted.
Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for
Administrative Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a
party that has requested a review may
withdraw that request within 90 days of
the date of publication of the notice of
initiation of the requested review. The
regulation provides that the Department
may extend this time if it is reasonable
to do so. In order to provide parties
additional certainty with respect to
when the Department will exercise its
discretion to extend this 90-day
deadline, interested parties are advised
that, with regard to reviews requested
on the basis of anniversary months on
or after October 2013, the Department
does not intend to extend the 90-day
deadline unless the requestor
demonstrates that an extraordinary
circumstance has prevented it from
submitting a timely withdrawal request.
Determinations by the Department to
extend the 90-day deadline will be
made on a case-by-case basis.
The Department is providing this
notice on its Web site, as well as in its
‘‘Opportunity to Request Administrative
Review’’ notices, so that interested
parties will be aware of the manner in
which the Department intends to
exercise its discretion in the future.
Opportunity TO Request A Review:
Not later than the last day of October
2013,1 interested parties may request
administrative review of the following
orders, findings, or suspended
investigations, with anniversary dates in
October for the following periods:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Period of review
Antidumping duty proceedings
AUSTRALIA: Electrolytic Manganese Dioxide A–602–806 ...........................................................................................................
1 Or the next business day, if the deadline falls
on a weekend, federal holiday or any other day
when the Department is closed.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:48 Oct 01, 2013
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM
02OCN1
10/1/12–9/30/13
60848
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2013 / Notices
Period of review
BRAZIL: Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod A–351–832 ..................................................................................................
INDONESIA: Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod A–560–815 ...........................................................................................
ITALY: Pressure Sensitive Plastic Tape A–475–059 ....................................................................................................................
MEXICO: Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod ....................................................................................................................
MOLDOVA: Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod A–841–805 .............................................................................................
REPUBLIC OF KOREA: Polyvinyl Alcohol A–580–850 ................................................................................................................
THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA:
Barium Carbonate A–570–880 ...............................................................................................................................................
Barium Chloride A–570–007 ..................................................................................................................................................
Electrolytic Manganese Dioxide A–570–919 ..........................................................................................................................
Helical Spring Lock Washers A–570–822 ..............................................................................................................................
Polyvinyl Alcohol A–570–879 .................................................................................................................................................
Steel Wire Garment Hangers A–570–918 .............................................................................................................................
TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO: Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod A–247–804 ....................................................................
UKRAINE: Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod A–823–812 ...............................................................................................
Countervailing Duty Proceedings
BRAZIL: Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod C–351–833 ..................................................................................................
IRAN: Roasted In Shell Pistachios C–507–601 ............................................................................................................................
Suspension Agreements
MEXICO: Lemon Juice 2 A–201–835 ............................................................................................................................................
RUSSIA: Uranium A–821–802 ......................................................................................................................................................
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
In accordance with 19 CFR
351.213(b), an interested party as
defined by section 771(9) of the Act may
request in writing that the Secretary
conduct an administrative review. For
both antidumping and countervailing
duty reviews, the interested party must
specify the individual producers or
exporters covered by an antidumping
finding or an antidumping or
countervailing duty order or suspension
agreement for which it is requesting a
review. In addition, a domestic
interested party or an interested party
described in section 771(9)(B) of the Act
must state why it desires the Secretary
to review those particular producers or
exporters.3 If the interested party
intends for the Secretary to review sales
of merchandise by an exporter (or a
producer if that producer also exports
merchandise from other suppliers)
which were produced in more than one
country of origin and each country of
origin is subject to a separate order, then
the interested party must state
specifically, on an order-by-order basis,
which exporter(s) the request is
intended to cover.
Please note that, for any party the
Department was unable to locate in
2 In the notice of opportunity to request
administrative reviews that published on
September 3, 2013 (78 FR 54235) the Department
listed the period of review for case Lemon Juice
from Mexico incorrectly. The correct period of
review for this case is listed above.
3 If the review request involves a non-market
economy and the parties subject to the review
request do not qualify for separate rates, all other
exporters of subject merchandise from the nonmarket economy country who do not have a
separate rate will be covered by the review as part
of the single entity of which the named firms are
a part.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:48 Oct 01, 2013
Jkt 232001
prior segments, the Department will not
accept a request for an administrative
review of that party absent new
information as to the party’s location.
Moreover, if the interested party who
files a request for review is unable to
locate the producer or exporter for
which it requested the review, the
interested party must provide an
explanation of the attempts it made to
locate the producer or exporter at the
same time it files its request for review,
in order for the Secretary to determine
if the interested party’s attempts were
reasonable, pursuant to 19 CFR
351.303(f)(3)(ii).
As explained in Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003), and NonMarket Economy Antidumping
Proceedings: Assessment of
Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694
(October 24, 2011) the Department has
clarified its practice with respect to the
collection of final antidumping duties
on imports of merchandise where
intermediate firms are involved. The
public should be aware of this
clarification in determining whether to
request an administrative review of
merchandise subject to antidumping
findings and orders. See also the
Enforcement and Compliance Web site
at https://trade.gov/ia.
All requests must be filed
electronically in Import
Administration’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (‘‘IA
ACCESS’’) on the IA ACCESS Web site
at https://iaaccess.trade.gov. See
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10/1/12–9/30/13
10/1/12–9/30/13
10/1/12–9/30/13
10/1/12–9/30/13
A–201–830
10/1/12–9/30/13
10/1/12–9/30/13
10/1/12–9/30/13
10/1/12–9/30/13
10/1/12–9/30/13
10/1/12–9/30/13
10/1/12–9/30/13
10/1/12–9/30/13
10/1/12–9/30/13
10/1/12–9/30/13
1/1/12–12/31/12
1/1/12–12/31/12
9/1/12–9/20/12
10/1/12–9/30/13
Proceedings: Electronic Filing
Procedures; Administrative Protective
Order Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6,
2011). Further, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.303(f)(l)(i), a copy of each
request must be served on the petitioner
and each exporter or producer specified
in the request.
The Department will publish in the
Federal Register a notice of ‘‘Initiation
of Administrative Review of
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation’’ for requests received by
the last day of October 2013. If the
Department does not receive, by the last
day of October 2013, a request for
review of entries covered by an order,
finding, or suspended investigation
listed in this notice and for the period
identified above, the Department will
instruct CBP to assess antidumping or
countervailing duties on those entries at
a rate equal to the cash deposit of (or
bond for) estimated antidumping or
countervailing duties required on those
entries at the time of entry, or
withdrawal from warehouse, for
consumption and to continue to collect
the cash deposit previously ordered.
For the first administrative review of
any order, there will be no assessment
of antidumping or countervailing duties
on entries of subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption during the relevant
provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period of
the order, if such a gap period is
applicable to the period of review.
This notice is not required by statute
but is published as a service to the
international trading community.
E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM
02OCN1
60849
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2013 / Notices
Dated: September 20, 2013.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2013–23955 Filed 10–1–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–570–911]
Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel
Pipe From the People’s Republic of
China: Final Results of the Expedited
First Sunset Review of the
Countervailing Duty Order
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective October 2, 2013.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Department) finds that revocation of
the countervailing duty (CVD) order on
circular welded carbon quality steel
pipe (circular welded pipe) from the
People’s Republic of China (PRC) would
be likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of net countervailable
subsidies.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jerrold Freeman or Nancy Decker, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 1, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
AGENCY:
telephone (202) 482–0180 or (202) 482–
0196, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 3, 2013, the Department
initiated the first sunset review of the
CVD order 1 on circular welded pipe
from the PRC pursuant to section 751(c)
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act).2
Between June 12, and June 18, 2013,
the Department received notices of
intent to participate from Allied Tube
and Conduit, EXLTUBE, JMC Steel
Group, Maruichi American Corporation,
TMK IPSCO, United States Steel
Corporation, and Western Tube &
Conduit Corporation) (collectively,
domestic interested parties), within the
deadline specified in 19 CFR
351.218(d)(1)(i). On July 2, 2013, the
Department received an adequate
substantive response from the domestic
interested parties within the 30-day
deadline specified in 19 CFR
351.218(d)(3)(i).
The Department did not receive any
submissions from other interested
parties. As a result, pursuant to 19 CFR
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department is
conducting an expedited (120-day)
sunset review of the CVD order.
Scope of the Order
This order covers certain welded
carbon quality steel pipes and tubes. A
full description of the scope of the order
is contained in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum,3 which is hereby
adopted by this notice.
The Issues and Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Import
Administration’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS).
IA ACCESS is available to registered
users at https://iaaccess.trade.gov and in
the Central Records Unit, room 7046 of
the main Department of Commerce
building. In addition, a complete
version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly
on the Internet at https://www.trade.gov/
ia/. The signed Issues and Decision
Memorandum and the electronic
versions of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in this review are
addressed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum. The issues include the
likelihood of continuation or recurrence
of a countervailable subsidy and the net
countervailable subsidy likely to prevail
if the order was revoked.
Final Results of Review
Pursuant to sections 752(b)(1) and (3)
of the Act, we determine that revocation
of the CVD order on circular welded
pipe from the PRC would be likely to
lead to continuation or recurrence of
countervailable subsidies at the
following net countervailable subsidy
rates:
Net
countervailable
subsidy
(percent)
Manufacturers/producers/exporters
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Weifang East Steel Pipe Co., Ltd (Weifang East) ........................................................................................................................
Zhejiang Kingland Pipeline and Technologies Co., Ltd., and affiliated companies (Zhejiang Kingland) .....................................
Tianjin Shuangjie Steel Pipe Co., Ltd.; Tianjin Shuangjie Steel Pipe Group Co., Ltd.; Tianjin Wa Song Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd.;
and Tianjin Shuanglian Galvanizing Products Co., Ltd. (Tianjin Shuangjie) .............................................................................
All Others .......................................................................................................................................................................................
1 See Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Pipe
from the People’s Republic of China: Notice of
Amended Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty
Determination and Notice of Countervailing Duty
Order, 73 FR 42545 (July 22, 2008) (CVD order).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:48 Oct 01, 2013
Jkt 232001
2 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 78
FR 33063 (June 3, 2013).
3 See Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Final Results of the Expedited Sunset Review of the
Countervailing Duty Order on Circular Welded
Carbon Quality Steel Pipe from the People’s
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
29.83
48.18
620.08
39.01
Republic of China’’ from Christian Marsh, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration,
dated concurrently with this notice (Issues and
Decision Memorandum).
E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM
02OCN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 2, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60847-60849]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-23955]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation; Opportunity to Request Administrative Review
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, formerly Import Administration,
International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD
Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone:
(202) 482-4735.
Background
Each year during the anniversary month of the publication of an
antidumping or countervailing duty order, finding, or suspended
investigation, an interested party, as defined in section 771(9) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''), may request, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.213, that the Department of Commerce (``the
Department'') conduct an administrative review of that antidumping or
countervailing duty order, finding, or suspended investigation.
All deadlines for the submission of comments or actions by the
Department discussed below refer to the number of calendar days from
the applicable starting date.
Respondent Selection
In the event the Department limits the number of respondents for
individual examination for administrative reviews initiated pursuant to
requests made for the orders identified below, the Department intends
to select respondents based on U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(``CBP'') data for U.S. imports during the period of review. We intend
to release the CBP data under Administrative Protective Order (``APO'')
to all parties having an APO within five days of publication of the
initiation notice and to make our decision regarding respondent
selection within 21 days of publication of the initiation Federal
Register notice. Therefore, we encourage all parties interested in
commenting on respondent selection to submit their APO applications on
the date of publication of the initiation notice, or as soon thereafter
as possible. The Department invites comments regarding the CBP data and
respondent selection within five days of placement of the CBP data on
the record of the review.
In the event the Department decides it is necessary to limit
individual examination of respondents and conduct respondent selection
under section 777A(c)(2) of the Act:
In general, the Department has found that determinations concerning
whether particular companies should be ``collapsed'' (i.e., treated as
a single entity for purposes of calculating antidumping duty rates)
require a substantial amount of detailed information and analysis,
which often require follow-up questions and analysis. Accordingly, the
Department will not conduct collapsing analyses at the respondent
selection phase of this review and will not collapse companies at the
respondent selection phase unless there has been a determination to
collapse certain companies in a previous segment of this antidumping
proceeding (i.e., investigation, administrative review, new shipper
review or changed circumstances review). For any company subject to
this review, if the Department determined, or continued to treat, that
company as collapsed with others, the Department will assume that such
companies continue to operate in the same manner and will collapse them
for respondent selection purposes. Otherwise, the Department will not
collapse companies for purposes of respondent selection. Parties are
requested to (a) identify which companies subject to review previously
were collapsed, and (b) provide a citation to the proceeding in which
they were collapsed. Further, if companies are requested to complete
the Quantity and Value Questionnaire for purposes of respondent
selection, in general each company must report volume and value data
separately for itself. Parties should not include data for any other
party, even if they believe they should be treated as a single entity
with that other party. If a company was collapsed with another company
or companies in the most recently completed segment of this proceeding
where the Department considered collapsing that entity, complete
quantity and value data for that collapsed entity must be submitted.
Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a party that has requested a
review may withdraw that request within 90 days of the date of
publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review. The
regulation provides that the Department may extend this time if it is
reasonable to do so. In order to provide parties additional certainty
with respect to when the Department will exercise its discretion to
extend this 90-day deadline, interested parties are advised that, with
regard to reviews requested on the basis of anniversary months on or
after October 2013, the Department does not intend to extend the 90-day
deadline unless the requestor demonstrates that an extraordinary
circumstance has prevented it from submitting a timely withdrawal
request. Determinations by the Department to extend the 90-day deadline
will be made on a case-by-case basis.
The Department is providing this notice on its Web site, as well as
in its ``Opportunity to Request Administrative Review'' notices, so
that interested parties will be aware of the manner in which the
Department intends to exercise its discretion in the future.
Opportunity TO Request A Review: Not later than the last day of
October 2013,\1\ interested parties may request administrative review
of the following orders, findings, or suspended investigations, with
anniversary dates in October for the following periods:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Or the next business day, if the deadline falls on a
weekend, federal holiday or any other day when the Department is
closed.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Period of review
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Antidumping duty proceedings
AUSTRALIA: Electrolytic Manganese Dioxide A-602-806.. 10/1/12-9/30/13
[[Page 60848]]
BRAZIL: Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod A-351- 10/1/12-9/30/13
832.................................................
INDONESIA: Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod A- 10/1/12-9/30/13
560-815.............................................
ITALY: Pressure Sensitive Plastic Tape A-475-059..... 10/1/12-9/30/13
MEXICO: Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod...... 10/1/12-9/30/13 A-
201-830
MOLDOVA: Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod A- 10/1/12-9/30/13
841-805.............................................
REPUBLIC OF KOREA: Polyvinyl Alcohol A-580-850....... 10/1/12-9/30/13
THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA:
Barium Carbonate A-570-880....................... 10/1/12-9/30/13
Barium Chloride A-570-007........................ 10/1/12-9/30/13
Electrolytic Manganese Dioxide A-570-919......... 10/1/12-9/30/13
Helical Spring Lock Washers A-570-822............ 10/1/12-9/30/13
Polyvinyl Alcohol A-570-879...................... 10/1/12-9/30/13
Steel Wire Garment Hangers A-570-918............. 10/1/12-9/30/13
TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO: Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel 10/1/12-9/30/13
Wire Rod A-247-804..................................
UKRAINE: Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod A- 10/1/12-9/30/13
823-812.............................................
Countervailing Duty Proceedings
BRAZIL: Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod C-351- 1/1/12-12/31/12
833.................................................
IRAN: Roasted In Shell Pistachios C-507-601.......... 1/1/12-12/31/12
Suspension Agreements
MEXICO: Lemon Juice \2\ A-201-835.................... 9/1/12-9/20/12
RUSSIA: Uranium A-821-802............................ 10/1/12-9/30/13
------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b), an interested party as
defined by section 771(9) of the Act may request in writing that the
Secretary conduct an administrative review. For both antidumping and
countervailing duty reviews, the interested party must specify the
individual producers or exporters covered by an antidumping finding or
an antidumping or countervailing duty order or suspension agreement for
which it is requesting a review. In addition, a domestic interested
party or an interested party described in section 771(9)(B) of the Act
must state why it desires the Secretary to review those particular
producers or exporters.\3\ If the interested party intends for the
Secretary to review sales of merchandise by an exporter (or a producer
if that producer also exports merchandise from other suppliers) which
were produced in more than one country of origin and each country of
origin is subject to a separate order, then the interested party must
state specifically, on an order-by-order basis, which exporter(s) the
request is intended to cover.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ In the notice of opportunity to request administrative
reviews that published on September 3, 2013 (78 FR 54235) the
Department listed the period of review for case Lemon Juice from
Mexico incorrectly. The correct period of review for this case is
listed above.
\3\ If the review request involves a non-market economy and the
parties subject to the review request do not qualify for separate
rates, all other exporters of subject merchandise from the non-
market economy country who do not have a separate rate will be
covered by the review as part of the single entity of which the
named firms are a part.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please note that, for any party the Department was unable to locate
in prior segments, the Department will not accept a request for an
administrative review of that party absent new information as to the
party's location. Moreover, if the interested party who files a request
for review is unable to locate the producer or exporter for which it
requested the review, the interested party must provide an explanation
of the attempts it made to locate the producer or exporter at the same
time it files its request for review, in order for the Secretary to
determine if the interested party's attempts were reasonable, pursuant
to 19 CFR 351.303(f)(3)(ii).
As explained in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003), and Non-
Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping
Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011) the Department has clarified its
practice with respect to the collection of final antidumping duties on
imports of merchandise where intermediate firms are involved. The
public should be aware of this clarification in determining whether to
request an administrative review of merchandise subject to antidumping
findings and orders. See also the Enforcement and Compliance Web site
at https://trade.gov/ia.
All requests must be filed electronically in Import
Administration's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (``IA ACCESS'') on the IA ACCESS Web site at
https://iaaccess.trade.gov. See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective
Order Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011). Further, in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.303(f)(l)(i), a copy of each request must be served on
the petitioner and each exporter or producer specified in the request.
The Department will publish in the Federal Register a notice of
``Initiation of Administrative Review of Antidumping or Countervailing
Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation'' for requests received
by the last day of October 2013. If the Department does not receive, by
the last day of October 2013, a request for review of entries covered
by an order, finding, or suspended investigation listed in this notice
and for the period identified above, the Department will instruct CBP
to assess antidumping or countervailing duties on those entries at a
rate equal to the cash deposit of (or bond for) estimated antidumping
or countervailing duties required on those entries at the time of
entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption and to continue to
collect the cash deposit previously ordered.
For the first administrative review of any order, there will be no
assessment of antidumping or countervailing duties on entries of
subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption during the relevant provisional-measures ``gap'' period of
the order, if such a gap period is applicable to the period of review.
This notice is not required by statute but is published as a
service to the international trading community.
[[Page 60849]]
Dated: September 20, 2013.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2013-23955 Filed 10-1-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
