Notice of Updates to the Department of Labor's List of Goods Produced by Child Labor or Forced Labor Required by the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2005, 60317-60319 [2013-23223]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 190 / Tuesday, October 1, 2013 / Notices
Summary of Information Collection
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms
and Explosives
[OMB Number 1140–0056]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comments Requested: Special Agent
Medical Preplacement
ACTION:
60-Day notice.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
The Department of Justice (DOJ),
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms
and Explosives (ATF), will be
submitting the following information
collection request to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
The proposed information collection is
published to obtain comments from the
public and affected agencies. Comments
are encouraged and will be accepted for
‘‘sixty days’’ until December 2, 2013.
This process is conducted in accordance
with 5 CFR 1320.10.
If you have comments especially on
the estimated public burden or
associated response time, suggestions,
or need a copy of the proposed
information collection instrument with
instructions or additional information,
please contact Danielle Murray, Human
Resources Operations Division, 99 New
York Ave. NE., Washington, DC 20226.
Written comments and suggestions
from the public and affected agencies
concerning the proposed collection of
information are encouraged. Your
comments should address one or more
of the following four points:
—Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
—Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
—Minimize the burden of the collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms
of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of
responses.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:45 Sep 30, 2013
Jkt 232001
(1) Type of Information Collection:
Revision of a currently approved
collection.
(2) Title of the Form/Collection:
Special Agent Medical Preplacement.
(3) Agency form number, if any, and
the applicable component of the
Department of Justice sponsoring the
collection: Form Number: ATF F
2300.10. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms and Explosives.
(4) Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract: Primary: Individuals or
households. Other: None.
Need for Collection
The form is used by a special agent
who is applying for a position that has
specific medical standards. The
information collected is used to
determine medical suitability to qualify
for a position that has specific medical
standards and physical requirements.
The information will also be used to
make a recommendation on either
hiring or not hiring an applicant.
(5) An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond: It is estimated that 240
respondents will complete a 45 minute
form.
(6) An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: There are an estimated 180
annual total burden hours associated
with this collection.
If additional information is required
contact: Jerri Murray, Department
Clearance Officer, Policy and Planning
Staff, Justice Management Division,
Department of Justice, Two Constitution
Square, 145 N Street NE., Room 3W–
1407B, Washington, DC 20530.
Dated: September 25, 2013.
Jerri Murray,
Department Clearance Officer, PRA, U.S.
Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2013–23789 Filed 9–30–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–FY–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Office of the Secretary of Labor
Notice of Updates to the Department of
Labor’s List of Goods Produced by
Child Labor or Forced Labor Required
by the Trafficking Victims Protection
Reauthorization Act of 2005
Bureau of International Labor
Affairs, Labor.
ACTION: Notice of Updates.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
60317
This notice removes 3 items
from the ‘‘List of Goods Produced by
Child Labor or Forced Labor’’ (List),
produced in accordance with the
Trafficking Victims Protection
Reauthorization Act (TVPRA) of 2005.
These updates amend the fourth edition
of the List, published on September 26,
2012. With these updates, the List
includes 134 goods from 73 countries,
and total of 342 line items. The primary
purposes of the List are to raise public
awareness about the incidence of child
labor and forced labor in the production
of goods in the countries listed and to
promote efforts to eliminate such
practices.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Director, Office of Child Labor, Forced
Labor, and Human Trafficking, Bureau
of International Labor Affairs, U.S.
Department of Labor at (202) 693–4843
(this is not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Updates to the List of Goods
The Bureau of International Labor
Affairs (ILAB) hereby announces the
removal of tobacco from Kazakhstan,
charcoal from Namibia, and diamonds
from Zimbabwe from the List, produced
in accordance with the TVPRA of 2005.
These updates amend the fourth edition
of the List, published on September 26,
2012. With these updates, the List
includes 134 goods from 73 countries,
and total of 342 line items.
Section 105(b) of the TVPRA of 2005
mandated that ILAB develop and
publish a list of goods from countries
that ILAB ‘‘has reason to believe are
produced with child labor or forced
labor in violation of international
standards.’’ (22 U.S.C. 7112(b)(2).)
ILAB’s Office of Child Labor, Forced
Labor, and Human Trafficking carries
out this mandate. ILAB published the
initial List on September 10, 2009, and
has since published annual updates.
Until this year, the annual updates have
taken the form of a full report which
includes a discussion of the List’s
context, scope, methodology, and
limitations. In 2013, ILAB has chosen to
publish a limited number of updates via
this notice. This is in accordance with
amendments made to the TVPRA by the
Violence Against Women
Reauthorization Act of 2013, which
mandated that ILAB publish the List
every two years beginning no later than
December 1, 2014. (Public Law 113–4.)
ILAB will publish a full, updated
TVPRA report in 2014.
The primary purposes of the List are
to raise public awareness about the
incidence of child labor and forced
labor in the production of goods in the
E:\FR\FM\01OCN1.SGM
01OCN1
60318
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 190 / Tuesday, October 1, 2013 / Notices
countries listed and to promote efforts
to eliminate such practices. Further
information about the List, including
the updated List, past years’ TVPRA
reports, Frequently Asked Questions,
and a bibliography of sources, are
available on the ILAB Web site at:
https://www.dol.gov/ilab/programs/ocft/
tvpra.htm.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
II. Methodology for Removal of Goods
From the List
Foreign governments, industry
groups, individual companies and other
stakeholders frequently inquire about
the process for removing a good from
the List. According to ILAB’s
‘‘Procedural Guidelines for the
Development and Maintenance of the
List of Goods From Countries Produced
by Child Labor or Forced Labor’’
(Procedural Guidelines), published in
the Federal Register on December 27,
2007, ILAB must have reason to believe
that a problem of child or forced labor
is ‘‘significantly reduc[ed] if not
eliminate[ed]’’ from the production of
the particular good in the country in
question for it to be removed. (72 FR
73374, 73377.) The guidelines indicate
that a forced or child labor problem at
‘‘a single company or facility’’ or in ‘‘an
isolated incident’’ ‘‘will not weigh in
favor of a finding that a good is
produced in violation of international
standards.’’ (Id.) Similarly, when ILAB
has reason to believe that a child or
forced labor problem with respect to a
listed good has been eliminated or
reduced to a single company or facility
or to an isolated incident, the threshold
for removal would be met.
The Procedural Guidelines also
provide a process by which the public
may submit comments relating to any
good on the List. ILAB has received over
100 such comments, or submissions,
available on the Internet at: https://
www.dol.gov/ilab/programs/ocft/
tvprasubmissions.htm. Many
submissions have contended that a good
should be removed from the List but
have not provided sufficient evidence
that the problem of child or forced labor
has been significantly reduced or
eliminated.
In the 2012–2013 research period,
ILAB staff reviewed four items currently
on the List to determine whether there
was a reason to believe that there had
been a significant reduction or
elimination of a problem of child labor
and/or forced labor. These items were:
tobacco from Kazakhstan, diamonds
from Zimbabwe, charcoal from Namibia,
and salt from Cambodia. ILAB reached
a determination on three of these items,
as discussed below, and continues to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:45 Sep 30, 2013
Jkt 232001
conduct research on the fourth item, salt
from Cambodia.
ILAB’s research included desk
research, in-person and telephone
interviews with key informants, and
when possible, travel to the relevant
countries to conduct in-person
interviews and site visits. In some cases,
research was carried out in coordination
with U.S. Government colleagues from
other agencies, grantees and/or
contractors. These three cases are
discussed more fully below.
Due to limited resources, ILAB was
not able to research in depth all the
goods currently on the List that
presented a possible case for removal
from the List, but we continue to
research potential removals on an
ongoing basis. In identifying the
particular cases on which to focus ILAB
research, we prioritize those for which
a credible argument for removal has
been brought to our attention by foreign
governments, industry groups or U.S.
Government colleagues from other
agencies, or other stakeholders.
III. Discussion of Goods and Countries
Removed
A. Research on Child Labor and Forced
Labor in Tobacco Production in
Kazakhstan
In 2009, ILAB placed tobacco from
Kazakhstan on the TVPRA List based on
sources dating from 2003–2008. These
sources indicated that children—both
Kazakh children and children of
migrant families—worked in a variety of
tobacco-related activities, including
performing strenuous, labor-intensive
tasks. The sources also indicated that
adult migrant laborers faced passport
confiscation, coercive recruitment,
induced indebtedness, and other forced
labor-related practices. That same year,
Philip Morris Kazakhstan (PMK), the
sole buyer of tobacco in Kazakhstan,
began to roll out its Agricultural Labor
Practices program, developed in
consultation with the non-governmental
´
organization (NGO) Verite and the
International Labor Organization. The
program includes comprehensive
monitoring of labor practices on all
tobacco farms in Kazakhstan, including
child labor and forced labor. Along with
this monitoring, PMK and its local NGO
partners have carried out efforts to
educate agricultural workers and
families about their rights, available
grievance mechanisms, and alternatives
to child labor; and the Government of
Kazakhstan has carried out enforcement
actions in areas where child labor is
suspected. At the same time as these
efforts have taken place, the size of the
tobacco sector has declined steeply. In
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2011, ILAB began to receive reports that
child and forced labor were no longer
present in the country’s relatively few
remaining tobacco farms.
Following up on these reports, ILAB
carried out research in 2012 and 2013 to
understand current labor conditions in
the sector, analyze efforts on the part of
various stakeholders to combat child
labor and forced labor, and determine
whether child labor and/or forced labor
remain significant problems in the
sector. ILAB carried out a qualitative
assessment that included a desk review,
field research to Kazakhstan for key
informant interviews, and follow-up
interviews with other key informants. In
all, 6 documents were analyzed and 17
interviews were conducted.
Informants confirmed that the size of
the industry had decreased from over
300 farms in 2010 to 74 farms in 2013.
With the reduction in the number of
farms and land used for tobacco
production, the use of migrant labor has
also declined. During the 2012 peak
season, only 140 migrants worked on
tobacco farms in Kazakhstan.
Informants—including government
officials and NGO representatives–
confirmed that the PMK monitoring
system is comprehensive and credible,
and that NGO efforts have been highly
effective in educating agricultural
workers about their rights, available
grievance mechanisms, and educational
opportunities as alternatives to child
labor. Since its inception in 2009, the
comprehensive monitoring system has
not identified any cases of forced labor,
and informants confirmed that previous
forced labor-related practices have been
abolished. A minority of ILAB’s
informants stated that child labor may
still occur in rare cases, but fewer than
200 children (native Kazakh and
migrant) currently live on tobacco
farms, and the comprehensive
monitoring system in place in the sector
identified only one child working in
2012.
ILAB has concluded that child labor
in Kazakhstan’s tobacco sector has been
significantly reduced. In addition, there
has been no evidence of forced labor in
Kazakhstan’s tobacco sector in recent
years, and ILAB’s research suggests the
practice has been virtually eliminated. If
a case of child labor or forced labor were
found in the sector, there are
mechanisms in place to address the
situation in an appropriate manner. As
a result, ILAB is removing tobacco from
Kazakhstan from the List.
B. Research on Child Labor in Charcoal
Production in Namibia
In response to a U.S. Embassy request
to research whether or not child labor in
E:\FR\FM\01OCN1.SGM
01OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 190 / Tuesday, October 1, 2013 / Notices
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
the production of charcoal existed in
more than an isolated incident, in early
2013 ILAB staff conducted follow-up
qualitative research to determine the
current situation of child labor in the
Namibian charcoal industry. The
research included a desk review of
documentation and in-country field
research, which included key informant
interviews and site visits.
The key informant interviews in
Namibia consisted of interviews with a
total of 30 informants, interviewed
individually and in groups, including
government officials at the national and
regional levels, charcoal producers,
former chairmen of the Namibian
Charcoal Producers’ Association,
workers and employers’ associations,
international organizations, and NGOs.
In total, 14 organizations were
interviewed. Site visits were conducted
to two charcoal producing farms in
Otjozondjupa Region, one in
Grootfontein and the other in
Otjiwarango. The interviews and site
visits conducted by ILAB staff in
Namibia validated that there is ‘‘no
significant incidence of child labor or
forced labor’’ in the production of
charcoal, and, after considering the
factors in the Procedural Guidelines,
ILAB determined that it no longer has
‘‘reason to believe’’ that the use of child
labor in charcoal production in Namibia
is more than isolated. Thus, ILAB is
removing Namibian charcoal from the
List.
C. Research on Child Labor in Diamond
Production in Zimbabwe
In 2006, diamonds were discovered in
the Marange region of southeastern
Zimbabwe, precipitating a rush to the
area by artisanal miners. Based on
sources documenting worst forms of
child labor in artisanal mining from
2006–2008—including working long
hours, carrying heavy loads, and
deprivation of food and water—ILAB
added diamonds from Zimbabwe to the
List.
However, beginning in October 2008,
the Government of Zimbabwe cracked
down on artisanal mining, and in 2010
began awarding concessions to private
companies to mine diamonds.
According to reports from 2011 onward,
the little artisanal mining that remained
was carried out mostly by informal
mining syndicates involving the
government’s security forces and private
security guards, and did not involve
children.
Following up on these reports, ILAB
carried out research in 2012 and 2013 to
understand the current labor conditions
in Zimbabwe’s diamond sector, analyze
the factors that may have affected
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:45 Sep 30, 2013
Jkt 232001
changes in the sector, and determine
whether child labor had been
significantly reduced or eliminated.
ILAB carried out a qualitative
assessment that included a desk review,
field research to Zimbabwe for key
informant interviews, and follow-up
interviews with other key informants. In
all, 17 documents were analyzed and 24
interviews were conducted.
Interviewees included government
officials, workers’ associations,
international organizations, NGOs, and
members of the Kimberley Process, a
joint government, industry and civil
society initiative to stem worldwide
flows of rough diamonds used by rebel
movements to finance wars against
legitimate governments. Informants
reported that artisanal mining was
virtually non-existent in Marange. In the
concessioned areas, Kimberley Process
monitors who had visited the mines had
seen no child labor, and other
informants felt that child labor was
extremely unlikely, in part due to the
more formal hiring processes in place in
the privately-run mines.
ILAB concluded that the change in
the diamond industry from informal
artisanal mining to tightly-controlled
concessioned mines has caused a
significant reduction in child labor.
Accordingly, ILAB is now removing
diamonds from Zimbabwe from the List.
This determination was based solely on
ILAB’s criteria for removal from the List,
which do not include consideration of
other human rights abuses in
Zimbabwe’s diamond sector that have
been reported by other U.S. Government
agencies, such as murder, torture, and
other cruel, inhuman, or degrading
treatment or punishment.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 17th day of
September, 2013.
Carol Pier,
Acting Deputy Undersecretary, Bureau of
International Labor Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2013–23223 Filed 9–30–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–28–P
OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY POLICY
NATIONAL NANOTECHNOLOGY
COORDINATION OFFICE
Request for Information: NNI
Nanotechnology for Sensors and
Sensors for Nanotechnology Signature
Initiative
Notice of request for
information.
ACTION:
The purpose of this Request
for Information (RFI) is to enhance the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
60319
value of the National Nanotechnology
Initiative (NNI) and of the
Nanotechnology Signature Initiative
(NSI) entitled Nanotechnology for
Sensors and Sensors for
Nanotechnology in particular, by
reaching out to the nanotechnology
stakeholder community for input
regarding specific needs for the
accelerated development and
commercialization of nanosensors. This
RFI is intended to inform planning for
a public workshop organized under the
auspices of the sensors NSI.
DATES: Responses to this RFI will be
accepted through 11:59 p.m. Eastern
Time on November 15, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Responses to this RFI may
be submitted electronically in the body
of or as an attachment to an email sent
to NNISensorsRFI@nnco.nano.gov.
Questions and responses may also be
sent by mail (please allow additional
time for processing) to the address:
National Nanotechnology Coordination
Office, ATTN: NNI Sensors RFI, 4201
Wilson Blvd., Stafford II, Suite 405,
Arlington, VA 22230.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Any
questions about the content of this RFI
should be sent to NNISensorsRFI@
nnco.nano.gov. Additional information
regarding this RFI can be found at
nano.gov or by calling (703) 292–8626.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
National Nanotechnology Coordination
Office is interested in responses that
address one or more of the following
Questions below that are broadly
categorized under Standards, Testing,
Manufacturing, Commercialization, and
Regulation. When submitting your
response, please indicate the question(s)
you are answering. Please be specific
and concise.
Background Information
The National Nanotechnology
Initiative (NNI) is a U.S. Government
research and development (R&D)
initiative of 20 Federal departments,
independent agencies, and independent
commissions (hereafter referred to as
‘agencies’) working together toward the
common challenging vision of a future
in which the ability to understand and
control matter at the nanoscale leads to
a revolution in technology and industry
that benefits society. The combined,
coordinated efforts of these agencies
have accelerated discovery,
development, and deployment of
nanotechnology towards agency
missions and the broader national
interest. Established in 2001, the NNI
involves nanotechnology-related
activities by the 20 member agencies.
E:\FR\FM\01OCN1.SGM
01OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 190 (Tuesday, October 1, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60317-60319]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-23223]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Office of the Secretary of Labor
Notice of Updates to the Department of Labor's List of Goods
Produced by Child Labor or Forced Labor Required by the Trafficking
Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2005
AGENCY: Bureau of International Labor Affairs, Labor.
ACTION: Notice of Updates.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice removes 3 items from the ``List of Goods Produced
by Child Labor or Forced Labor'' (List), produced in accordance with
the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA) of 2005.
These updates amend the fourth edition of the List, published on
September 26, 2012. With these updates, the List includes 134 goods
from 73 countries, and total of 342 line items. The primary purposes of
the List are to raise public awareness about the incidence of child
labor and forced labor in the production of goods in the countries
listed and to promote efforts to eliminate such practices.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Director, Office of Child Labor,
Forced Labor, and Human Trafficking, Bureau of International Labor
Affairs, U.S. Department of Labor at (202) 693-4843 (this is not a
toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Updates to the List of Goods
The Bureau of International Labor Affairs (ILAB) hereby announces
the removal of tobacco from Kazakhstan, charcoal from Namibia, and
diamonds from Zimbabwe from the List, produced in accordance with the
TVPRA of 2005. These updates amend the fourth edition of the List,
published on September 26, 2012. With these updates, the List includes
134 goods from 73 countries, and total of 342 line items.
Section 105(b) of the TVPRA of 2005 mandated that ILAB develop and
publish a list of goods from countries that ILAB ``has reason to
believe are produced with child labor or forced labor in violation of
international standards.'' (22 U.S.C. 7112(b)(2).) ILAB's Office of
Child Labor, Forced Labor, and Human Trafficking carries out this
mandate. ILAB published the initial List on September 10, 2009, and has
since published annual updates. Until this year, the annual updates
have taken the form of a full report which includes a discussion of the
List's context, scope, methodology, and limitations. In 2013, ILAB has
chosen to publish a limited number of updates via this notice. This is
in accordance with amendments made to the TVPRA by the Violence Against
Women Reauthorization Act of 2013, which mandated that ILAB publish the
List every two years beginning no later than December 1, 2014. (Public
Law 113-4.) ILAB will publish a full, updated TVPRA report in 2014.
The primary purposes of the List are to raise public awareness
about the incidence of child labor and forced labor in the production
of goods in the
[[Page 60318]]
countries listed and to promote efforts to eliminate such practices.
Further information about the List, including the updated List, past
years' TVPRA reports, Frequently Asked Questions, and a bibliography of
sources, are available on the ILAB Web site at: https://www.dol.gov/ilab/programs/ocft/tvpra.htm.
II. Methodology for Removal of Goods From the List
Foreign governments, industry groups, individual companies and
other stakeholders frequently inquire about the process for removing a
good from the List. According to ILAB's ``Procedural Guidelines for the
Development and Maintenance of the List of Goods From Countries
Produced by Child Labor or Forced Labor'' (Procedural Guidelines),
published in the Federal Register on December 27, 2007, ILAB must have
reason to believe that a problem of child or forced labor is
``significantly reduc[ed] if not eliminate[ed]'' from the production of
the particular good in the country in question for it to be removed.
(72 FR 73374, 73377.) The guidelines indicate that a forced or child
labor problem at ``a single company or facility'' or in ``an isolated
incident'' ``will not weigh in favor of a finding that a good is
produced in violation of international standards.'' (Id.) Similarly,
when ILAB has reason to believe that a child or forced labor problem
with respect to a listed good has been eliminated or reduced to a
single company or facility or to an isolated incident, the threshold
for removal would be met.
The Procedural Guidelines also provide a process by which the
public may submit comments relating to any good on the List. ILAB has
received over 100 such comments, or submissions, available on the
Internet at: https://www.dol.gov/ilab/programs/ocft/tvprasubmissions.htm. Many submissions have contended that a good
should be removed from the List but have not provided sufficient
evidence that the problem of child or forced labor has been
significantly reduced or eliminated.
In the 2012-2013 research period, ILAB staff reviewed four items
currently on the List to determine whether there was a reason to
believe that there had been a significant reduction or elimination of a
problem of child labor and/or forced labor. These items were: tobacco
from Kazakhstan, diamonds from Zimbabwe, charcoal from Namibia, and
salt from Cambodia. ILAB reached a determination on three of these
items, as discussed below, and continues to conduct research on the
fourth item, salt from Cambodia.
ILAB's research included desk research, in-person and telephone
interviews with key informants, and when possible, travel to the
relevant countries to conduct in-person interviews and site visits. In
some cases, research was carried out in coordination with U.S.
Government colleagues from other agencies, grantees and/or contractors.
These three cases are discussed more fully below.
Due to limited resources, ILAB was not able to research in depth
all the goods currently on the List that presented a possible case for
removal from the List, but we continue to research potential removals
on an ongoing basis. In identifying the particular cases on which to
focus ILAB research, we prioritize those for which a credible argument
for removal has been brought to our attention by foreign governments,
industry groups or U.S. Government colleagues from other agencies, or
other stakeholders.
III. Discussion of Goods and Countries Removed
A. Research on Child Labor and Forced Labor in Tobacco Production in
Kazakhstan
In 2009, ILAB placed tobacco from Kazakhstan on the TVPRA List
based on sources dating from 2003-2008. These sources indicated that
children--both Kazakh children and children of migrant families--worked
in a variety of tobacco-related activities, including performing
strenuous, labor-intensive tasks. The sources also indicated that adult
migrant laborers faced passport confiscation, coercive recruitment,
induced indebtedness, and other forced labor-related practices. That
same year, Philip Morris Kazakhstan (PMK), the sole buyer of tobacco in
Kazakhstan, began to roll out its Agricultural Labor Practices program,
developed in consultation with the non-governmental organization (NGO)
Verit[eacute] and the International Labor Organization. The program
includes comprehensive monitoring of labor practices on all tobacco
farms in Kazakhstan, including child labor and forced labor. Along with
this monitoring, PMK and its local NGO partners have carried out
efforts to educate agricultural workers and families about their
rights, available grievance mechanisms, and alternatives to child
labor; and the Government of Kazakhstan has carried out enforcement
actions in areas where child labor is suspected. At the same time as
these efforts have taken place, the size of the tobacco sector has
declined steeply. In 2011, ILAB began to receive reports that child and
forced labor were no longer present in the country's relatively few
remaining tobacco farms.
Following up on these reports, ILAB carried out research in 2012
and 2013 to understand current labor conditions in the sector, analyze
efforts on the part of various stakeholders to combat child labor and
forced labor, and determine whether child labor and/or forced labor
remain significant problems in the sector. ILAB carried out a
qualitative assessment that included a desk review, field research to
Kazakhstan for key informant interviews, and follow-up interviews with
other key informants. In all, 6 documents were analyzed and 17
interviews were conducted.
Informants confirmed that the size of the industry had decreased
from over 300 farms in 2010 to 74 farms in 2013. With the reduction in
the number of farms and land used for tobacco production, the use of
migrant labor has also declined. During the 2012 peak season, only 140
migrants worked on tobacco farms in Kazakhstan. Informants--including
government officials and NGO representatives- confirmed that the PMK
monitoring system is comprehensive and credible, and that NGO efforts
have been highly effective in educating agricultural workers about
their rights, available grievance mechanisms, and educational
opportunities as alternatives to child labor. Since its inception in
2009, the comprehensive monitoring system has not identified any cases
of forced labor, and informants confirmed that previous forced labor-
related practices have been abolished. A minority of ILAB's informants
stated that child labor may still occur in rare cases, but fewer than
200 children (native Kazakh and migrant) currently live on tobacco
farms, and the comprehensive monitoring system in place in the sector
identified only one child working in 2012.
ILAB has concluded that child labor in Kazakhstan's tobacco sector
has been significantly reduced. In addition, there has been no evidence
of forced labor in Kazakhstan's tobacco sector in recent years, and
ILAB's research suggests the practice has been virtually eliminated. If
a case of child labor or forced labor were found in the sector, there
are mechanisms in place to address the situation in an appropriate
manner. As a result, ILAB is removing tobacco from Kazakhstan from the
List.
B. Research on Child Labor in Charcoal Production in Namibia
In response to a U.S. Embassy request to research whether or not
child labor in
[[Page 60319]]
the production of charcoal existed in more than an isolated incident,
in early 2013 ILAB staff conducted follow-up qualitative research to
determine the current situation of child labor in the Namibian charcoal
industry. The research included a desk review of documentation and in-
country field research, which included key informant interviews and
site visits.
The key informant interviews in Namibia consisted of interviews
with a total of 30 informants, interviewed individually and in groups,
including government officials at the national and regional levels,
charcoal producers, former chairmen of the Namibian Charcoal Producers'
Association, workers and employers' associations, international
organizations, and NGOs. In total, 14 organizations were interviewed.
Site visits were conducted to two charcoal producing farms in
Otjozondjupa Region, one in Grootfontein and the other in Otjiwarango.
The interviews and site visits conducted by ILAB staff in Namibia
validated that there is ``no significant incidence of child labor or
forced labor'' in the production of charcoal, and, after considering
the factors in the Procedural Guidelines, ILAB determined that it no
longer has ``reason to believe'' that the use of child labor in
charcoal production in Namibia is more than isolated. Thus, ILAB is
removing Namibian charcoal from the List.
C. Research on Child Labor in Diamond Production in Zimbabwe
In 2006, diamonds were discovered in the Marange region of
southeastern Zimbabwe, precipitating a rush to the area by artisanal
miners. Based on sources documenting worst forms of child labor in
artisanal mining from 2006-2008--including working long hours, carrying
heavy loads, and deprivation of food and water--ILAB added diamonds
from Zimbabwe to the List.
However, beginning in October 2008, the Government of Zimbabwe
cracked down on artisanal mining, and in 2010 began awarding
concessions to private companies to mine diamonds. According to reports
from 2011 onward, the little artisanal mining that remained was carried
out mostly by informal mining syndicates involving the government's
security forces and private security guards, and did not involve
children.
Following up on these reports, ILAB carried out research in 2012
and 2013 to understand the current labor conditions in Zimbabwe's
diamond sector, analyze the factors that may have affected changes in
the sector, and determine whether child labor had been significantly
reduced or eliminated. ILAB carried out a qualitative assessment that
included a desk review, field research to Zimbabwe for key informant
interviews, and follow-up interviews with other key informants. In all,
17 documents were analyzed and 24 interviews were conducted.
Interviewees included government officials, workers' associations,
international organizations, NGOs, and members of the Kimberley
Process, a joint government, industry and civil society initiative to
stem worldwide flows of rough diamonds used by rebel movements to
finance wars against legitimate governments. Informants reported that
artisanal mining was virtually non-existent in Marange. In the
concessioned areas, Kimberley Process monitors who had visited the
mines had seen no child labor, and other informants felt that child
labor was extremely unlikely, in part due to the more formal hiring
processes in place in the privately-run mines.
ILAB concluded that the change in the diamond industry from
informal artisanal mining to tightly-controlled concessioned mines has
caused a significant reduction in child labor. Accordingly, ILAB is now
removing diamonds from Zimbabwe from the List. This determination was
based solely on ILAB's criteria for removal from the List, which do not
include consideration of other human rights abuses in Zimbabwe's
diamond sector that have been reported by other U.S. Government
agencies, such as murder, torture, and other cruel, inhuman, or
degrading treatment or punishment.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 17th day of September, 2013.
Carol Pier,
Acting Deputy Undersecretary, Bureau of International Labor Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2013-23223 Filed 9-30-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-28-P