Petitions for Modification of Application of Existing Mandatory Safety Standards, 59066-59068 [2013-23266]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
59066
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 186 / Wednesday, September 25, 2013 / Notices
2013. The DOL seeks to extend PRA
authorization for this information
collection for three (3) more years,
without any change to existing
requirements. It should be noted that
existing information collection
requirements submitted to the OMB
receive a month-to-month extension
while they undergo review. For
additional substantive information
about this ICR, see the related notice
published in the Federal Register on
May 22, 2013 (78 FR 30333).
Interested parties are encouraged to
send comments to the OMB, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs at
the address shown in the ADDRESSES
section within 30 days of publication of
this notice in the Federal Register. In
order to help ensure appropriate
consideration, comments should
mention OMB Control Number 1210–
0123. The OMB is particularly
interested in comments that:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Agency: DOL–EBSA.
Title of Collection: Notice
Requirements of the Health Care
Continuation Coverage Provisions.
OMB Control Number: 1210–0123.
Affected Public: Private Sector—
businesses or other for-profits.
Total Estimated Number of
Respondents: 599,000.
Total Estimated Number of
Responses: 20,712,556.
Total Estimated Annual Burden
Hours: 0.
Total Estimated Annual Other Costs
Burden: $26,554,404.
Dated: September 18, 2013.
Michel Smyth,
Departmental Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013–23260 Filed 9–24–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–29–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:20 Sep 24, 2013
Jkt 229001
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Mine Safety and Health Administration
Petitions for Modification of
Application of Existing Mandatory
Safety Standards
Mine Safety and Health
Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Section 101(c) of the Federal
Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 and
30 CFR part 44 govern the application,
processing, and disposition of petitions
for modification. This notice is a
summary of petitions for modification
submitted to the Mine Safety and Health
Administration (MSHA) by the parties
listed below to modify the application
of existing mandatory safety standards
codified in Title 30 of the Code of
Federal Regulations.
DATES: All comments on the petitions
must be received by the Office of
Standards, Regulations and Variances
on or before October 25, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit your
comments, identified by ‘‘docket
number’’ on the subject line, by any of
the following methods:
1. Electronic Mail: zzMSHAcomments@dol.gov. Include the docket
number of the petition in the subject
line of the message.
2. Facsimile: 202–693–9441.
3. Regular Mail or Hand Delivery:
MSHA, Office of Standards, Regulations
and Variances, 1100 Wilson Boulevard,
Room 2350, Arlington, Virginia 22209–
3939, Attention: George F. Triebsch,
Director, Office of Standards,
Regulations and Variances. Persons
delivering documents are required to
check in at the receptionist’s desk on
the 21st floor. Individuals may inspect
copies of the petitions and comments
during normal business hours at the
address listed above.
MSHA will consider only comments
postmarked by the U.S. Postal Service or
proof of delivery from another delivery
service such as UPS or Federal Express
on or before the deadline for comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Barbara Barron, Office of Standards,
Regulations and Variances at 202–693–
9447 (Voice), barron.barbara@dol.gov
(Email), or 202–693–9441 (Facsimile).
[These are not toll-free numbers.]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
Section 101(c) of the Federal Mine
Safety and Health Act of 1977 (Mine
Act) allows the mine operator or
representative of miners to file a
petition to modify the application of any
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
mandatory safety standard to a coal or
other mine if the Secretary of Labor
determines that:
1. An alternative method of achieving
the result of such standard exists which
will at all times guarantee no less than
the same measure of protection afforded
the miners of such mine by such
standard; or
2. That the application of such
standard to such mine will result in a
diminution of safety to the miners in
such mine.
In addition, the regulations at 30 CFR
44.10 and 44.11 establish the
requirements and procedures for filing
petitions for modification.
II. Petitions for Modification
Docket Number: M–2013–039–C.
Petitioner: Rock N Roll Coal
Company, Inc., P.O. Box 142, Justice,
West Virginia 24851.
Mines: Mine No. 3, MSHA I.D. No.
46–08646 and Mine No. 7, MSHA I.D.
No. 46–09093, located in McDowell
County, West Virginia.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.1101–
1(b) (Deluge-type water spray systems).
Modification Request: The petitioner
requests a modification of the existing
standard to eliminate the use of blowoff dust covers for the spray nozzles of
a deluge-type water spray system. In
support of the alternative method, the
petitioner proposes to continue
performing the weekly inspections and
functional testing of the complete
deluge-type water spray system. The
petitioner states that:
(1) The system consists of an average
of thirty (30) sprays along each of
approximately ten primary beltconveyor drives and an average of sixty
(60) sprays along each eight secondary
drives.
(2) The company currently complies
with the requirements of the existing
standard by providing each nozzle with
a blow-off dust cover. In view of the
frequent inspections and functional
testing of the system, the dust covers are
not necessary because nozzles can be
maintained in an unclogged condition
through weekly use.
(3) It is burdensome to recap the large
number of covers weekly after each
inspection and functional test.
The petitioner asserts that the
alternative method will at all times
guarantee no less than the same measure
of protection afforded the miners
employed at the Rock and Roll Coal
Company, as the standard.
Docket Number: M–2013–040–C.
Petitioner: Blackwood Mining, 540
East Center Street, Ashland,
Pennsylvania 17921.
E:\FR\FM\25SEN1.SGM
25SEN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 186 / Wednesday, September 25, 2013 / Notices
Mine: Mammoth Slope, MSHA I.D.
No. 36–10062, located in Schuylkill
County, Pennsylvania.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.1100–
2(a)(2) (Quantity and location of
firefighting equipment).
Modification Request: The petitioner
requests a modification of the existing
standard to permit the use of portable
fire extinguishers only to replace
existing requirements where rock dust,
water cars, and other water storage
equipped with three 10-quart pails is
not practical. The petitioner states that:
(1) Equipping its small anthracite
mine with two portable fire
extinguishers near the slope bottom and
an additional portable fire extinguisher
within 500 feet of the working face will
provide equivalent fire protection.
(2) Anthracite coal is low in volatile
matter and dust is not explosive.
(3) The working section is at or below
mine pool elevation with frequent
pumping required to de-water the work
area.
(4) All up-pitch workings of moderate
to steep pitch are accessed only through
ladders making the carrying of water in
pails impractical.
(5) Electric face equipment is
nonexistent in this hand-loading
anthracite mine and only air-operated
equipment is used in or inby the last
open crosscut.
(6) The history of underground mines
shows that fires occurring in the
working faces are nonexistent in recent
years due to improved explosives and
low volatile matter in anthracite coal.
(7) This anthracite mine produces far
less than the 300 ton per shift criteria
using the hand-loading method.
(8) Belt conveyor haulage is not used
in this underground mine for section/
main haulage minimizing fire potential.
The petitioner asserts that the
proposed alternative method will
provide no less than the same measure
of protection afforded the miners under
the existing standard.
Docket Number: M–2013–041–C.
Petitioner: Blackwood Mining, 540
East Center Street, Ashland,
Pennsylvania 17921.
Mine: Mammoth Slope, MSHA I.D.
No. 36–10062, located in Schuylkill
County, Pennsylvania.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR
75.1200(d) & (i) (Mine maps).
Modification Request: The petitioner
requests a modification of the existing
standard to permit the use of crosssections in lieu of contour lines on mine
maps through the intake slope, at
locations of rock tunnel connections
between veins, and at 1,000 feet
intervals of advance from the intake
slope. In addition, the petitioner
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:20 Sep 24, 2013
Jkt 229001
proposes to limit the required mapping
of mine workings above and below to
those present within 100 feet of the
vein(s) being mined unless the veins are
interconnected to other veins beyond
the 100 feet limit through rock tunnels.
The petitioner states that:
(1) Due to the steep pitch encountered
in mining anthracite coal veins,
contours provide no useful information
and their presence would make portions
of the map illegible.
(2) The use of cross-sections in lieu of
contour lines has been practiced since
the late 1800’s and provides critical
information about spacing between
veins and proximity to other mine
workings, which fluctuate considerably.
(3) The vast majority of current
underground anthracite mining involves
either second mining of remnant pillars
from previous mining or the mining of
veins of lower quality in proximity to
inaccessible and frequently flooded
abandoned mine workings that may or
may not be mapped.
(4) All mapping for mines above and
below is researched by the petitioner’s
contract engineer for the presence of
interconnecting rock tunnels between
veins in relation to the mine, and a
hazard analysis is done when mapping
indicates the presence of known or
potentially flooded workings.
(5) When no rock tunnel connections
are found, mine workings that exist
beyond 100 feet from the mine, are
recognized as presenting no hazard to
the mine due to the pitch of the vein
and rock separation.
(6) Additionally, the mine workings
above and below are usually inactive
and abandoned and, therefore, are not
usually subject to changes during the
life of the mine.
(7) Where evidence indicates prior
mining was conducted on a vein above
or below and research exhausts the
availability of mine mapping, the vein
will be considered mined and flooded
and appropriate precautions will be
taken through § 75.388, which addresses
drilling boreholes in advance of mining,
where possible.
(8) Where potential hazards exist and
in-mine drilling capabilities limit
penetration, surface boreholes may be
used to intercept the workings and the
results analyzed prior to beginning
mining in the affected area.
The petitioner asserts that the
proposed alternative method will
provide no less than the same measure
of protection afforded the miners under
the existing standard.
Docket Number: M–2013–042–C.
Petitioner: Blackwood Mining, 540
East Center Street, Ashland,
Pennsylvania 17921.
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
59067
Mine: Mammoth Slope, MSHA I.D.
No. 36–10062, located in Schuylkill
County, Pennsylvania.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.1202–
1(a) (Temporary notations, revisions and
requirements).
Modification Request: The petitioner
requests a modification of the existing
standard to permit the interval of survey
to be established on an annual basis
from the initial survey in lieu of every
6 months as required. The petitioner
proposes to continue to update the mine
map by hand notations on a daily basis
and conduct subsequent surveys prior to
commencing retreat mining, and
whenever either a drilling program
under § 75.388 or plan for mining into
inaccessible areas under § 75.389 is
required. The petitioner states that:
(1) The low production and slow rate
of advance in anthracite mining make
surveying on 6-month intervals
impractical. In most cases annual
development is frequently limited to
less than 500 feet of gangway advance
with associated up-pitch development.
(2) The vast majority of small
anthracite mines are non-mechanized
and use hand-loading mining methods.
(3) Development above the active
gangway is designed to mine into the
level above at designated intervals
thereby maintaining sufficient control
between both surveyed gangways.
(4) The available engineering/
surveyor resources are limited in the
anthracite coal fields and surveying on
an annual basis is difficult to achieve
with four individual contractors
currently available.
The petitioner asserts that the
proposed alternative method will
provide no less than the same measure
of protection afforded the miners under
the existing standard.
Docket Number: M–2013–043–C.
Petitioner: Blackwood Mining, 540
East Center Street, Ashland,
Pennsylvania 17921.
Mine: Mammoth Slope, MSHA I.D.
No. 36–10062, located in Schuylkill
County, Pennsylvania.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.1400
(Hoisting equipment; general).
Modification Request: The petitioner
seeks to permit the use of a slope
conveyance (gunboat) to transport
persons without safety catches or other
no less effective devices but instead use
an increased rope strength/safety factor
and secondary safety rope connection in
place of such devices. The petitioner
states that:
(1) The haulage slope of the
Mammoth Mine is typical of those in
the anthracite region, having a relatively
high angle and frequently changing
pitches.
E:\FR\FM\25SEN1.SGM
25SEN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
59068
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 186 / Wednesday, September 25, 2013 / Notices
(2) A functional safety catch capable
of working in slopes with knuckles and
curves is not commercially available. If
a makeshift device is installed it would
activate on knuckles or curves when no
emergency existed, causing a tumbling
effect on the conveyance which would
increase rather than decrease the hazard
to miners.
(3) A safer alternative is to operate the
man cage or steel gunboat with
secondary safety connections securely
fastened around the gunboat and to the
hoisting rope above the main connecting
device and use hoisting ropes having a
factor of safety greater than the
American Standards Specifications for
the Use of Wire Rope in Mines.
(4) Furthermore, the slope and
haulage system at this mine are
essentially the same as those to which
petitions granting the use of the
alternative suggestion have been
approved since 1973.
The petitioner asserts that the
proposed alternative method will
provide no less than the same measure
of protection afforded the miners under
the existing standard.
Docket Number: M–2013–044–C.
Petitioner: Rosebud Mining Company,
P.O. Box 1025, Northern Cambria,
Pennsylvania 15714.
Mines: Parkwood Mine, MSHA I.D.
No. 36–08785, located in Armstrong
County, Pennsylvania and Kocjancic
Mine, MSHA I.D. No. 36–09436, located
in Jefferson County, Pennsylvania.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.503
(Permissible electric face equipment;
maintenance), 30 CFR 18.35(a)(5)(i)(ii)
(Portable (trailing) cables and cords).
Modification Request: The petitioner
requests a modification of the existing
standard to permit the use of 480-volt
trailing cables with a maximum length
of 1200 feet when No. 2 American
Gauge Wire (AWG) cable is used and
480-volt trailing cables with a maximum
length of 950 feet when No. 4 AWG
cable is used on roof bolters. The
petitioner states that:
(1) The trailing cable for the 480-volt
roof bolters will not be smaller than No.
4 AWG cable.
(2) All circuit breakers used to protect
the No. 2 AWG trailing cable and No. 4
AWG trailing cable exceeding 700 feet
in length will have instantaneous trip
units calibrated to trip at 500 amperes.
The trip setting of these circuit breakers
will be sealed to insure that the settings
on these breakers cannot be changed,
and these breakers will have permanent,
legible labels. Each label will identify
the circuit breaker as being suitable for
protecting the cables.
(3) Replacement circuit breakers and/
or instantaneous trip units used to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:20 Sep 24, 2013
Jkt 229001
protect No. 2 AWG trailing cable or No.
4 AWG trailing cable will be calibrated
to trip at 500 amperes and will be
sealed.
(4) All components that provide shortcircuit protection will have a sufficient
interruption rating in accordance with
the maximum calculated fault currents
available.
(5) During each production day, the
trailing cables, and the circuit breakers
will be examined in accordance with all
30 CFR provisions.
(6) Permanent warning labels will be
installed and maintained on the load
center to identify the location of each
sealed short-circuit protection device.
These labels will warn miners not to
change or alter the sealed short-circuit
settings of these devices.
(7) If the affected trailing cables are
damaged in any way during the shift,
the cable will be de-energized and
repairs made.
(8) The petitioner’s alternative
method will not be implemented until
all miners who have been designated to
operate the bolters, or any other person
designated to examine the trailing
cables or trip settings on the circuit
breakers have received proper training
as to the performance of their duties.
(9) Within 60 days after this proposed
decision and order becomes final, the
proposed revisions for the petitioner’s
approved 30 CFR part 48 training plan
will be submitted to the District
Manager. The training plan will include
the following:
(a) The hazards of setting the shortcircuit device(s) too high to adequately
protect the trailing cables.
(b) How to verify that the circuit
interrupting device(s) protecting the
trailing cable(s) are properly set and
maintained.
(c) Mining methods and operating
procedures for protecting the trailing
cables against damage.
(d) Proper procedures for examining
the trailing cables to ensure safe
operating condition by visual inspection
of the entire cable, observing the
insulation, the integrity of the splices,
nicks and abrasions.
The petitioner further states that
procedures specified in 30 CFR 48.3 for
proposed revisions to approved training
plans will apply.
The petitioner asserts that the
alternative method will guarantee no
less than the same measure of protection
for all miners than that of the existing
standard.
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated: September 19, 2013.
George F. Triebsch,
Director, Office of Standards, Regulations and
Variances.
[FR Doc. 2013–23266 Filed 9–24–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–43–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[EA–12–189; NRC–2013–0220]
Chicago Bridge and Iron; Confirmatory
Order (Effective Immediately)
I.
Chicago Bridge and Iron (CB&I), is a
large multinational conglomerate
engineering, procurement and
construction company serving various
industries in the United States and
overseas; some of which are regulated
by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC). CB&I’s main office
is located in The Woodlands, Texas.
II.
This Confirmatory Order (referenced
as Confirmatory Order or Order) is the
result of an agreement reached during
alternative dispute resolution (ADR)
mediation sessions conducted on June
11, 2013, and July 29, 2013, in Rockville
Maryland.
On June 4, 2011, the NRC’s Office of
Investigations (OI) issued its report of
investigation (OI Report No. 2–2011–
047). The investigation related to a
nuclear construction site in South
Carolina, operated by CB&I, formerly
known as Shaw Nuclear Services, Inc.
and hereafter referred to as Shaw. Based
upon evidence developed during its
investigation, the NRC identified an
apparent violation of Title 10 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR)
52.5, ‘‘Employee protection,’’ involving
a former Shaw employee who was
terminated, in part, for notifying Shaw
and Louisiana Energy Service (at the
direction of the individual’s supervisor,
a Shaw official), of a potential 10 CFR
part 21 issue regarding selected heats of
rebar that had failed the ASME bend test
and may have been shipped to the
Louisiana Energy Service facility. In
addition, the NRC found Shaw’s Code of
Corporate Conduct to be overly
restrictive and may prevent employees
from raising nuclear safety concerns.
By letter dated October 19, 2012, the
NRC identified to CB&I the apparent
violation of 10 CFR 52.5 and offered
CB&I the opportunity to provide a
response in writing, attend a predecisional enforcement conference, or to
request ADR in which a neutral
mediator with no decision-making
E:\FR\FM\25SEN1.SGM
25SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 186 (Wednesday, September 25, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59066-59068]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-23266]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Mine Safety and Health Administration
Petitions for Modification of Application of Existing Mandatory
Safety Standards
AGENCY: Mine Safety and Health Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Section 101(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of
1977 and 30 CFR part 44 govern the application, processing, and
disposition of petitions for modification. This notice is a summary of
petitions for modification submitted to the Mine Safety and Health
Administration (MSHA) by the parties listed below to modify the
application of existing mandatory safety standards codified in Title 30
of the Code of Federal Regulations.
DATES: All comments on the petitions must be received by the Office of
Standards, Regulations and Variances on or before October 25, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit your comments, identified by ``docket
number'' on the subject line, by any of the following methods:
1. Electronic Mail: zzMSHA-comments@dol.gov. Include the docket
number of the petition in the subject line of the message.
2. Facsimile: 202-693-9441.
3. Regular Mail or Hand Delivery: MSHA, Office of Standards,
Regulations and Variances, 1100 Wilson Boulevard, Room 2350, Arlington,
Virginia 22209-3939, Attention: George F. Triebsch, Director, Office of
Standards, Regulations and Variances. Persons delivering documents are
required to check in at the receptionist's desk on the 21st floor.
Individuals may inspect copies of the petitions and comments during
normal business hours at the address listed above.
MSHA will consider only comments postmarked by the U.S. Postal
Service or proof of delivery from another delivery service such as UPS
or Federal Express on or before the deadline for comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara Barron, Office of Standards,
Regulations and Variances at 202-693-9447 (Voice),
barron.barbara@dol.gov (Email), or 202-693-9441 (Facsimile). [These are
not toll-free numbers.]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 101(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977
(Mine Act) allows the mine operator or representative of miners to file
a petition to modify the application of any mandatory safety standard
to a coal or other mine if the Secretary of Labor determines that:
1. An alternative method of achieving the result of such standard
exists which will at all times guarantee no less than the same measure
of protection afforded the miners of such mine by such standard; or
2. That the application of such standard to such mine will result
in a diminution of safety to the miners in such mine.
In addition, the regulations at 30 CFR 44.10 and 44.11 establish
the requirements and procedures for filing petitions for modification.
II. Petitions for Modification
Docket Number: M-2013-039-C.
Petitioner: Rock N Roll Coal Company, Inc., P.O. Box 142, Justice,
West Virginia 24851.
Mines: Mine No. 3, MSHA I.D. No. 46-08646 and Mine No. 7, MSHA I.D.
No. 46-09093, located in McDowell County, West Virginia.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.1101-1(b) (Deluge-type water spray
systems).
Modification Request: The petitioner requests a modification of the
existing standard to eliminate the use of blow-off dust covers for the
spray nozzles of a deluge-type water spray system. In support of the
alternative method, the petitioner proposes to continue performing the
weekly inspections and functional testing of the complete deluge-type
water spray system. The petitioner states that:
(1) The system consists of an average of thirty (30) sprays along
each of approximately ten primary belt-conveyor drives and an average
of sixty (60) sprays along each eight secondary drives.
(2) The company currently complies with the requirements of the
existing standard by providing each nozzle with a blow-off dust cover.
In view of the frequent inspections and functional testing of the
system, the dust covers are not necessary because nozzles can be
maintained in an unclogged condition through weekly use.
(3) It is burdensome to recap the large number of covers weekly
after each inspection and functional test.
The petitioner asserts that the alternative method will at all
times guarantee no less than the same measure of protection afforded
the miners employed at the Rock and Roll Coal Company, as the standard.
Docket Number: M-2013-040-C.
Petitioner: Blackwood Mining, 540 East Center Street, Ashland,
Pennsylvania 17921.
[[Page 59067]]
Mine: Mammoth Slope, MSHA I.D. No. 36-10062, located in Schuylkill
County, Pennsylvania.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.1100-2(a)(2) (Quantity and location
of firefighting equipment).
Modification Request: The petitioner requests a modification of the
existing standard to permit the use of portable fire extinguishers only
to replace existing requirements where rock dust, water cars, and other
water storage equipped with three 10-quart pails is not practical. The
petitioner states that:
(1) Equipping its small anthracite mine with two portable fire
extinguishers near the slope bottom and an additional portable fire
extinguisher within 500 feet of the working face will provide
equivalent fire protection.
(2) Anthracite coal is low in volatile matter and dust is not
explosive.
(3) The working section is at or below mine pool elevation with
frequent pumping required to de-water the work area.
(4) All up-pitch workings of moderate to steep pitch are accessed
only through ladders making the carrying of water in pails impractical.
(5) Electric face equipment is nonexistent in this hand-loading
anthracite mine and only air-operated equipment is used in or inby the
last open crosscut.
(6) The history of underground mines shows that fires occurring in
the working faces are nonexistent in recent years due to improved
explosives and low volatile matter in anthracite coal.
(7) This anthracite mine produces far less than the 300 ton per
shift criteria using the hand-loading method.
(8) Belt conveyor haulage is not used in this underground mine for
section/main haulage minimizing fire potential.
The petitioner asserts that the proposed alternative method will
provide no less than the same measure of protection afforded the miners
under the existing standard.
Docket Number: M-2013-041-C.
Petitioner: Blackwood Mining, 540 East Center Street, Ashland,
Pennsylvania 17921.
Mine: Mammoth Slope, MSHA I.D. No. 36-10062, located in Schuylkill
County, Pennsylvania.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.1200(d) & (i) (Mine maps).
Modification Request: The petitioner requests a modification of the
existing standard to permit the use of cross-sections in lieu of
contour lines on mine maps through the intake slope, at locations of
rock tunnel connections between veins, and at 1,000 feet intervals of
advance from the intake slope. In addition, the petitioner proposes to
limit the required mapping of mine workings above and below to those
present within 100 feet of the vein(s) being mined unless the veins are
interconnected to other veins beyond the 100 feet limit through rock
tunnels. The petitioner states that:
(1) Due to the steep pitch encountered in mining anthracite coal
veins, contours provide no useful information and their presence would
make portions of the map illegible.
(2) The use of cross-sections in lieu of contour lines has been
practiced since the late 1800's and provides critical information about
spacing between veins and proximity to other mine workings, which
fluctuate considerably.
(3) The vast majority of current underground anthracite mining
involves either second mining of remnant pillars from previous mining
or the mining of veins of lower quality in proximity to inaccessible
and frequently flooded abandoned mine workings that may or may not be
mapped.
(4) All mapping for mines above and below is researched by the
petitioner's contract engineer for the presence of interconnecting rock
tunnels between veins in relation to the mine, and a hazard analysis is
done when mapping indicates the presence of known or potentially
flooded workings.
(5) When no rock tunnel connections are found, mine workings that
exist beyond 100 feet from the mine, are recognized as presenting no
hazard to the mine due to the pitch of the vein and rock separation.
(6) Additionally, the mine workings above and below are usually
inactive and abandoned and, therefore, are not usually subject to
changes during the life of the mine.
(7) Where evidence indicates prior mining was conducted on a vein
above or below and research exhausts the availability of mine mapping,
the vein will be considered mined and flooded and appropriate
precautions will be taken through Sec. 75.388, which addresses
drilling boreholes in advance of mining, where possible.
(8) Where potential hazards exist and in-mine drilling capabilities
limit penetration, surface boreholes may be used to intercept the
workings and the results analyzed prior to beginning mining in the
affected area.
The petitioner asserts that the proposed alternative method will
provide no less than the same measure of protection afforded the miners
under the existing standard.
Docket Number: M-2013-042-C.
Petitioner: Blackwood Mining, 540 East Center Street, Ashland,
Pennsylvania 17921.
Mine: Mammoth Slope, MSHA I.D. No. 36-10062, located in Schuylkill
County, Pennsylvania.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.1202-1(a) (Temporary notations,
revisions and requirements).
Modification Request: The petitioner requests a modification of the
existing standard to permit the interval of survey to be established on
an annual basis from the initial survey in lieu of every 6 months as
required. The petitioner proposes to continue to update the mine map by
hand notations on a daily basis and conduct subsequent surveys prior to
commencing retreat mining, and whenever either a drilling program under
Sec. 75.388 or plan for mining into inaccessible areas under Sec.
75.389 is required. The petitioner states that:
(1) The low production and slow rate of advance in anthracite
mining make surveying on 6-month intervals impractical. In most cases
annual development is frequently limited to less than 500 feet of
gangway advance with associated up-pitch development.
(2) The vast majority of small anthracite mines are non-mechanized
and use hand-loading mining methods.
(3) Development above the active gangway is designed to mine into
the level above at designated intervals thereby maintaining sufficient
control between both surveyed gangways.
(4) The available engineering/surveyor resources are limited in the
anthracite coal fields and surveying on an annual basis is difficult to
achieve with four individual contractors currently available.
The petitioner asserts that the proposed alternative method will
provide no less than the same measure of protection afforded the miners
under the existing standard.
Docket Number: M-2013-043-C.
Petitioner: Blackwood Mining, 540 East Center Street, Ashland,
Pennsylvania 17921.
Mine: Mammoth Slope, MSHA I.D. No. 36-10062, located in Schuylkill
County, Pennsylvania.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.1400 (Hoisting equipment; general).
Modification Request: The petitioner seeks to permit the use of a
slope conveyance (gunboat) to transport persons without safety catches
or other no less effective devices but instead use an increased rope
strength/safety factor and secondary safety rope connection in place of
such devices. The petitioner states that:
(1) The haulage slope of the Mammoth Mine is typical of those in
the anthracite region, having a relatively high angle and frequently
changing pitches.
[[Page 59068]]
(2) A functional safety catch capable of working in slopes with
knuckles and curves is not commercially available. If a makeshift
device is installed it would activate on knuckles or curves when no
emergency existed, causing a tumbling effect on the conveyance which
would increase rather than decrease the hazard to miners.
(3) A safer alternative is to operate the man cage or steel gunboat
with secondary safety connections securely fastened around the gunboat
and to the hoisting rope above the main connecting device and use
hoisting ropes having a factor of safety greater than the American
Standards Specifications for the Use of Wire Rope in Mines.
(4) Furthermore, the slope and haulage system at this mine are
essentially the same as those to which petitions granting the use of
the alternative suggestion have been approved since 1973.
The petitioner asserts that the proposed alternative method will
provide no less than the same measure of protection afforded the miners
under the existing standard.
Docket Number: M-2013-044-C.
Petitioner: Rosebud Mining Company, P.O. Box 1025, Northern
Cambria, Pennsylvania 15714.
Mines: Parkwood Mine, MSHA I.D. No. 36-08785, located in Armstrong
County, Pennsylvania and Kocjancic Mine, MSHA I.D. No. 36-09436,
located in Jefferson County, Pennsylvania.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.503 (Permissible electric face
equipment; maintenance), 30 CFR 18.35(a)(5)(i)(ii) (Portable (trailing)
cables and cords).
Modification Request: The petitioner requests a modification of the
existing standard to permit the use of 480-volt trailing cables with a
maximum length of 1200 feet when No. 2 American Gauge Wire (AWG) cable
is used and 480-volt trailing cables with a maximum length of 950 feet
when No. 4 AWG cable is used on roof bolters. The petitioner states
that:
(1) The trailing cable for the 480-volt roof bolters will not be
smaller than No. 4 AWG cable.
(2) All circuit breakers used to protect the No. 2 AWG trailing
cable and No. 4 AWG trailing cable exceeding 700 feet in length will
have instantaneous trip units calibrated to trip at 500 amperes. The
trip setting of these circuit breakers will be sealed to insure that
the settings on these breakers cannot be changed, and these breakers
will have permanent, legible labels. Each label will identify the
circuit breaker as being suitable for protecting the cables.
(3) Replacement circuit breakers and/or instantaneous trip units
used to protect No. 2 AWG trailing cable or No. 4 AWG trailing cable
will be calibrated to trip at 500 amperes and will be sealed.
(4) All components that provide short-circuit protection will have
a sufficient interruption rating in accordance with the maximum
calculated fault currents available.
(5) During each production day, the trailing cables, and the
circuit breakers will be examined in accordance with all 30 CFR
provisions.
(6) Permanent warning labels will be installed and maintained on
the load center to identify the location of each sealed short-circuit
protection device. These labels will warn miners not to change or alter
the sealed short-circuit settings of these devices.
(7) If the affected trailing cables are damaged in any way during
the shift, the cable will be de-energized and repairs made.
(8) The petitioner's alternative method will not be implemented
until all miners who have been designated to operate the bolters, or
any other person designated to examine the trailing cables or trip
settings on the circuit breakers have received proper training as to
the performance of their duties.
(9) Within 60 days after this proposed decision and order becomes
final, the proposed revisions for the petitioner's approved 30 CFR part
48 training plan will be submitted to the District Manager. The
training plan will include the following:
(a) The hazards of setting the short-circuit device(s) too high to
adequately protect the trailing cables.
(b) How to verify that the circuit interrupting device(s)
protecting the trailing cable(s) are properly set and maintained.
(c) Mining methods and operating procedures for protecting the
trailing cables against damage.
(d) Proper procedures for examining the trailing cables to ensure
safe operating condition by visual inspection of the entire cable,
observing the insulation, the integrity of the splices, nicks and
abrasions.
The petitioner further states that procedures specified in 30 CFR
48.3 for proposed revisions to approved training plans will apply.
The petitioner asserts that the alternative method will guarantee
no less than the same measure of protection for all miners than that of
the existing standard.
Dated: September 19, 2013.
George F. Triebsch,
Director, Office of Standards, Regulations and Variances.
[FR Doc. 2013-23266 Filed 9-24-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-43-P