Certain Steel Nails From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of the Fourth Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 56861-56864 [2013-22475]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 179 / Monday, September 16, 2013 / Notices
of the subject merchandise from the PRC
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication date of the final results, as
provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Act: (1) For previously investigated or
reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters
not listed above that have separate rates,
the cash deposit rate will continue to be
the exporter-specific rate published for
the most recent period; (2) for all PRC
exporters of subject merchandise which
have not been found to be entitled to a
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will
be the PRC-wide rate of $2.63 per
kilogram; and (3) for all non-PRC
exporters of subject merchandise which
have not received their own rate, the
cash deposit rate will be the rate
applicable to the PRC exporters that
supplied that non-PRC exporter. These
deposit requirements, when imposed,
shall remain in effect until further
notice.
Notifications
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this POR. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Department’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
has occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping
duties.
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to the administrative
protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
notification of the destruction of APO
materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and the terms of an APO is a
sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing these
results and this notice in accordance
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the
Act.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Dated: September 10, 2013.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
Appendix
The following companies are not eligible
for separate rate status in this administrative
review and are considered part of the PRCwide Entity:
1. Ahcof Industrial Development Corp., Ltd.
2. Alfred L. Wolff (Beijing) Co., Ltd.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:46 Sep 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
3. Anhui Changhao Import & Export Trading
4. Anhui Honghui Import & Export Trade Co.,
Ltd.
5. Anhui Cereals Oils and Foodstuffs I/E
(Group) Corporation
6. Anhui Hundred Health Foods Co., Ltd.
7. Anhui Native Produce Imp & Exp Corp.
8. Anhui Time Tech Co., Ltd.
9. APM Global Logistics (Shanghai) Co.
10. Baiste Trading Co., Ltd.
11. Cheng Du Wai Yuan Bee Products Co.,
Ltd.
12. Chengdu Stone Dynasty Art Stone
13. Damco China Limited Qingdao Branch
14. Dongtai Peak Honey Industry Co., Ltd.
15. Eurasia Bee’s Products Co., Ltd.
16. Feidong Foreign Trade Co., Ltd.
17. Fresh Honey Co., Ltd. (formerly Mgl. Yun
Shen)
18. Golden Tadco Int’l
19. Hangzhou Golden Harvest Health
Industry Co., Ltd.
20. Hangzhou Tienchu Miyuan Health Food
Co., Ltd.
21. Haoliluck Co., Ltd.
22. Hengjide Healthy Products Co. Ltd.
23. Hubei Yusun Co., Ltd.
24. Inner Mongolia Altin Bee-Keeping
25. Inner Mongolia Youth Trade
Development Co., Ltd.
26. Jiangsu Cereals, Oils Foodstuffs Import
Export (Group) Corp.
27. Jiangsu Kanghong Natural Healthfoods
Co., Ltd.
28. Jiangsu Light Industry Products Imp &
Exp (Group) Corp.
29. Jilin Province Juhui Import
30. Maersk Logistics (China) Company Ltd.
31. Nefelon Limited Company
32. Ningbo Shengye Electric Appliance
33. Ningbo Shunkang Health Food Co., Ltd.
34. Ningxia Yuehai Trading Co., Ltd.
35. Product Source Marketing Ltd.
36. Qingdao Aolan Trade Co., Ltd.
37. QHD Sanhai Honey Co., Ltd.
38. Qinhuangdao Municipal Dafeng
Industrial Co., Ltd.
39. Renaissance India Mannite
40. Shaanxi Youthsun Co., Ltd.
41. Shanghai Bloom International Trading
Co., Ltd.
42. Shanghai Foreign Trade Co., Ltd.
43. Shanghai Hui Ai Mal Tose Co., Ltd.
44. Shanghai Luyuan Import & Export
45. Shine Bal Co., Ltd.
46. Sichuan-Dujiangyan Dubao Bee Industrial
Co., Ltd.
47. Sichuan Hasten Imp Exp. Trading Co.,
Ltd.
48. Silverstream International Co., Ltd.
49. Sunnice Honey
50. Suzhou Aiyi IE Trading Co., Ltd.
51. Suzhou Shanding Honey Product Co. Ltd.
52. Tianjin Weigeda Trading Co., Ltd.
53. Wanxi Haohua Food Co., Ltd.
54. Wuhan Shino-Food Trade Co., Ltd.
55. Wuhu Anjie Food Co., Ltd.
56. Wuhu Deli Foods Co. Ltd.
57. Wuhu Fenglian Co., Ltd.
58. Wuhu Haoyikuai I & E Co.
59. Wuhu Haoyikuai Import & Export Co.,
Ltd.
60. Wuhu Haoyikuai Food Products Co., Ltd.
61. Wuhu Qinshi Tangye
62. Wuhu Qinshi Tangye Co., Ltd.
63. Wuhu Xinrui Bee-Product Co., Ltd.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
56861
64. Xinjiang Jinhui Food Co., Ltd.
65. Youngster International Trading Co., Ltd.
66. Zhejiang Willing Foreign Trading Co.
[FR Doc. 2013–22477 Filed 9–13–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–909]
Certain Steel Nails From the People’s
Republic of China: Preliminary Results
of the Fourth Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(‘‘Department’’) is conducting the fourth
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain steel
nails (‘‘nails’’) from the People’s
Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’).1 The
Department has preliminarily
determined that sales have been made
below normal value (‘‘NV’’) by the
respondents examined during the
period of review (‘‘POR’’), August 1,
2011, through July 31, 2012. If these
preliminary results are adopted in the
final results, the Department will
instruct U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (‘‘CBP’’) to assess
antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries of subject merchandise during
the POR. Interested parties are invited to
comment on these preliminary results.
DATES: Effective Date: September 16,
2013.
AGENCY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Javier Barrientos or Matthew Renkey,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 9, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone 202–482–2243 or 202–482–
2312, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the order
includes certain steel nails having a
shaft length up to 12 inches. Certain
steel nails subject to the order are
currently classified under the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) subheadings
7317.00.55, 7317.00.65 and 7317.00.75.
While the HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs
1 See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: Certain
Steel Nails From the People’s Republic of China, 73
FR 44961 (August 1, 2008).
E:\FR\FM\16SEN1.SGM
16SEN1
56862
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 179 / Monday, September 16, 2013 / Notices
purposes, the written description of the
scope of the order is dispositive.
For a full description of the scope, see
‘‘Certain Steel Nails From the People’s
Republic of China: Decision
Memorandum for the Preliminary
Results of the 2011–2012 Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated
concurrently with this notice
(‘‘Preliminary Decision Memorandum’’).
Methodology
The Department has conducted these
reviews in accordance with section
751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (‘‘Act’’). Constructed export
prices and export prices have been
calculated in accordance with section
772 of the Act. Because the PRC is a
nonmarket economy (‘‘NME’’) within
the meaning of section 771(18) of the
Act, NV has been calculated in
accordance with section 773(c) of the
Act. For a full description of the
methodology underlying our
conclusions, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum, which is dated
concurrently with these results and
hereby adopted by this notice. The
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a
public document and is on file
electronically via Import
Administration’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (‘‘IA
ACCESS’’). IA ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
iaaccess.trade.gov, and is available to all
parties in the Central Records Unit,
room 7046 of the main Department of
Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly on the internet at https://
www.trade.gov/ia/. The signed
Preliminary Decision Memorandum and
the electronic versions of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum are
identical in content.
Preliminary Results of Review
The Department preliminarily
determines that the following weightedaverage dumping margins exist for the
period August 1, 2011, through July 31,
2012:
Weighted-average
margin
(percent)
Exporter
(1) Stanley 2 .................................................................................................................................................................................
(2) JISCO 3 ...................................................................................................................................................................................
(3) Cana (Tianjin) Hardware Industrial Co., Ltd ..........................................................................................................................
(4) Chiieh Yung Metal Ind. Corp. ................................................................................................................................................
(5) China Staple Enterprise (Tianjin) Co., Ltd .............................................................................................................................
(6) Dezhou Hualude Hardware Products Co., Ltd ......................................................................................................................
(7) Hebei Cangzhou New Century Foreign Trade Co., Ltd ........................................................................................................
(8) Huanghua Jinhai Hardware Products Co., Ltd ......................................................................................................................
(9) Huanghua Xionghua Hardware Products Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................
(10) Nanjing Yuechang Hardware Co., Ltd .................................................................................................................................
(11) Qingdao D&L Group Ltd ......................................................................................................................................................
(12) SDC International Australia Pty., Ltd ...................................................................................................................................
(13) Shandong Dinglong Import & Export Co., Ltd .....................................................................................................................
(14) Shandong Oriental Cherry Hardware Group Co., Ltd .........................................................................................................
(15) Shandong Oriental Cherry Hardware Import and Export Co., Ltd ......................................................................................
(16) Shanghai Curvet Hardware Products Co., Ltd ....................................................................................................................
(17) Shanghai Yueda Nails Industry Co., Ltd .............................................................................................................................
(18) Shanxi Hairui Trade Co., Ltd ...............................................................................................................................................
(19) Shanxi Pioneer Hardware Industrial Co., Ltd ......................................................................................................................
(20) Shanxi Tianli Industries Co., Ltd ..........................................................................................................................................
(21) S-Mart (Tianjin) Technology Development Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................
v22) Suntec Industries Co., Ltd ...................................................................................................................................................
(23) Suzhou Xingya Nail Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................................
(24) Tianjin Jinchi Metal Products Co., Ltd .................................................................................................................................
(25) Tianjin Jinghai County Hongli Industry & Business Co., Ltd ...............................................................................................
(26) Tianjin Lianda Group Co., Ltd ..............................................................................................................................................
(27) Tianjin Universal Machinery Imp & Exp Corporation ...........................................................................................................
(28) Tianjin Zhonglian Metals Ware Co., Ltd ..............................................................................................................................
(29) Xi’an Metals & Minerals Import and Export Co., Ltd ...........................................................................................................
(30) Zhejiang Gem-Chun Hardware Accessory Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................
PRC-Wide Rate ...........................................................................................................................................................................
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Disclosure, Public Comment and
Opportunity To Request a Hearing
The Department intends to disclose
the calculations used in our analysis to
parties in these reviews within five days
2 The Stanley Works (Langfang) Fastening
Systems Co., Ltd. (‘‘Stanley Langfang’’), and Stanley
Black & Decker, Inc. (‘‘SBD’’) (collectively,
‘‘Stanley’’).
3 Qingdao JISCO Co., Ltd. and ECO System
Corporation (d/b/a JISCO Corporation) (collectively,
‘‘JISCO’’).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:46 Sep 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
of the date of publication of this notice
in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Interested parties are invited to
comment on the preliminary results of
this review. However, we plan to issue
post-preliminary supplemental
questionnaires and, therefore, will be
extending the case brief deadline. The
Department will inform interested
parties of the updated briefing schedule
when it has been confirmed.4 Rebuttals
to case briefs, which must be limited to
issues raised in the case briefs, must be
filed within five days after the time
limit for filing case briefs.5 Parties who
submit arguments are requested to
submit with the argument (a) a
statement of the issue, (b) a brief
summary of the argument, and (c) a
table of authorities.6 Parties submitting
briefs should do so pursuant to the
Department’s electronic filing system,
IA ACCESS.
Any interested party may request a
hearing within 30 days of publication of
5 See
4 See
PO 00000
19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii).
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
22.90
43.45
26.41
26.41
26.41
26.41
26.41
26.41
26.41
26.41
26.41
26.41
26.41
26.41
26.41
26.41
26.41
26.41
26.41
26.41
26.41
26.41
26.41
26.41
26.41
26.41
26.41
26.41
26.41
26.41
118.04
6 See
E:\FR\FM\16SEN1.SGM
19 CFR 351.309(d)(1)–(2).
19 CFR 351.309(c)(2), (d)(2).
16SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 179 / Monday, September 16, 2013 / Notices
this notice.7 Hearing requests should
contain the following information: (1)
The party’s name, address, and
telephone number; (2) the number of
participants; and (3) a list of the issues
to be discussed. Oral presentations will
be limited to issues raised in the briefs.
If a request for a hearing is made, parties
will be notified of the time and date for
the hearing to be held at the U.S.
Department of Commerce, 14th Street
and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230.8
The Department intends to issue the
final results of this administrative
review, which will include the results of
our analysis of all issues raised in the
case briefs, within 120 days of
publication of these preliminary results
in the Federal Register, pursuant to
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Deadline for Submission of Publicly
Available Surrogate Value Information
In accordance with 19 CFR
351.301(c)(3)(ii), the deadline for
submission of publicly available
information to value the factors of
production under 19 CFR 351.408(c) is
20 days after the date of publication of
the preliminary results. In accordance
with 19 CFR 351.301(c)(1), if an
interested party submits factual
information less than 10 days before or
on the applicable deadline for
submission of such factual information,
an interested party may submit factual
information to rebut, clarify, or correct
the factual information no later than ten
days after such factual information is
served on the interested party. However,
the Department generally will not
accept in the rebuttal submission
additional or alternative surrogate value
(‘‘SV’’) information not previously on
the record, if the deadline for
submission of SV information has
passed.9 Furthermore, the Department
generally will not accept business
proprietary information in either the SV
submissions or the rebuttals thereto, as
the regulation regarding the submission
of SVs allows only for the submission of
publicly available information.10
Finally, for each piece of factual
information submitted with SV rebuttal
comments, the interested party must
provide a written explanation of what
information that is already on the record
of the ongoing proceeding that the
7 See
19 CFR 351.310(c).
19 CFR 351.310(d).
9 See Glycine from the People’s Republic of
China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review and Final Rescission, in
Part, 72 FR 58809 (October 17, 2007), and
accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at
Comment 2.
10 See 19 CFR 351.301(c)(3).
8 See
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:46 Sep 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
factual information is rebutting,
clarifying, or correcting.
Assessment Rates
Upon issuance of the final results, the
Department will determine, and CBP
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries covered by this
review.11 The Department intends to
issue assessment instructions to CBP 15
days after the publication date of the
final results of this review.
For assessment purposes, the
Department applied the assessment rate
calculation method adopted in
Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation
of the Weighted-Average Dumping
Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain
Antidumping Proceedings: Final
Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14,
2012). For any individually examined
respondent whose weighted average
dumping margin is above de minimis
(i.e., 0.50 percent) in the final results of
this review, the Department will
calculate importer-specific assessment
rates on the basis of the ratio of the total
amount of dumping calculated for the
importer’s examined sales to the total
entered value of sales, in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Where an
importer- (or customer-) specific ad
valorem rate is greater than de minimis,
the Department will instruct CBP to
collect the appropriate duties at the time
of liquidation.12 Where either a
respondent’s weighted average dumping
margin is zero or de minimis, or an
importer- (or customer-) specific ad
valorem is zero or de minimis, the
Department will instruct CBP to
liquidate appropriate entries without
regard to antidumping duties.13 For the
respondents that were not selected for
individual examination in this
administrative review and that qualified
for a separate rate, the assessment rate
will be based on the average of the
mandatory respondents.14 We intend to
instruct CBP to liquidate entries
containing subject merchandise
exported by the PRC-wide entity at the
PRC-wide rate.
The Department recently announced a
refinement to its assessment practice in
NME cases. Pursuant to this refinement
in practice, for entries that were not
reported in the U.S. sales databases
submitted by companies individually
examined during the administrative
review, the Department will instruct
CBP to liquidate such entries at the
PRC-wide rate. Additionally, if the
Department determines that an exporter
11 See
19 CFR 351.212(b) .
19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
13 See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
14 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
12 See
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
56863
had no shipments of the subject
merchandise, any suspended entries
that entered under that exporter’s case
number (i.e., at that exporter’s rate) will
be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.15
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of these
reviews for shipments of the subject
merchandise from the PRC entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication
date, as provided by sections
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the
companies listed above that have a
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will
be that established in the final results of
these reviews (except, if the rate is zero
or de minimis, then zero cash deposit
will be required); (2) for previously
investigated or reviewed PRC and nonPRC exporters not listed above that
received a separate rate in a prior
segment of this proceeding, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the
existing exporter-specific rate; (3) for all
PRC exporters of subject merchandise
that have not been found to be entitled
to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate
will be that for the PRC-wide entity; and
(4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject
merchandise which have not received
their own rate, the cash deposit rate will
be the rate applicable to the PRC
exporter that supplied that non-PRC
exporter. These deposit requirements,
when imposed, shall remain in effect
until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a
preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during the POR.
Failure to comply with this requirement
could result in the Department’s
presumption that reimbursement of
antidumping duties occurred and the
subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties.
This preliminary determination is
issued and published in accordance
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of
the Act.
15 For a full discussion of this practice, see NonMarket Economy Antidumping Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694
(October 24, 2011).
E:\FR\FM\16SEN1.SGM
16SEN1
56864
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 179 / Monday, September 16, 2013 / Notices
Dated: September 3, 2013.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
1. Case History
2. Scope of the Order
3. Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments
4. Non-Market Economy Country Status
5. Separate Rates
6. Separate Rate Calculation for Companies
Not Individually Examined
7. PRC-Wide Entity
8. Facts Available
9. Surrogate Country and Surrogate Value
Data
10. Date of Sale
11. Determination of Comparison Method
12. Results of the Differential Pricing
Analysis
13. Comparisons to Normal Value
14. U.S. Price
15. Normal Value
16. Factor Valuations
17. Currency Conversion
[FR Doc. 2013–22475 Filed 9–13–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–929]
Small Diameter Graphite Electrodes
From the People’s Republic of China:
Affirmative Final Determination of
Circumvention of the Antidumping
Duty Order and Rescission of LaterDeveloped Merchandise
Anticircumvention Inquiry
Thomas Schauer or Minoo Hatten,
Office 1, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC, 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–0410, and (202) 482–1690,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On April 17, 2013, the Department
published in the Federal Register the
affirmative Preliminary Determination
that graphite electrodes produced and/
or exported by Jilin Carbon, with an
actual or nominal diameter of 17 inches,
and otherwise meeting the description
of in-scope merchandise, constitute
merchandise altered in form or
appearance in such minor respects that
it should be included within the scope
of the Order, pursuant to section 781(c)
of the Act.2
On May 15, 2013, and May 17, 2013,
SGL Carbon LLC and Superior Graphite
Co. (Petitioners), Jilin Carbon, and
Ceramark Technology, Inc. (Ceramark)
filed case briefs.3 On May 22, 2013,
Petitioners filed a rebuttal brief.4
On June 27, 2013, we initially
contacted U.S. International Trade
Commission (ITC) staff via telephone to
discuss our preliminary affirmative
circumvention determination 5 and on
August 2, 2013, we formally notified the
ITC of our Preliminary Determination.6
On August 16, 2013, the ITC sent a letter
in reply.7
Scope of the Antidumping Duty Order
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
The merchandise subject to the order
is small diameter graphite electrodes.
1 See Antidumping Duty Order: Small Diameter
Graphite Electrodes From the People’s Republic of
China, 74 FR 8775 (February 26, 2009) (Order).
2 See Small Diameter Graphite Electrodes From
the People’s Republic of China: Affirmative
Preliminary Determination of Circumvention of the
Antidumping Duty Order and Intent To Rescind
Later-Developed Merchandise Circumvention
Inquiry, 78 FR 22843 (April 17, 2013) (Preliminary
Determination).
3 See Petitioners’ case brief dated May 17, 2013,
Jilin Carbon’s case brief dated May 17, 2013, and
Ceramark’s case brief dated May 15, 2013.
4 See Petitioners’ rebuttal brief dated May 22,
2013.
5 See Memorandum to the file, ‘‘Circumvention
Inquiry of the Antidumping Duty Order on Small
Diameter Graphite Electrodes From the People’s
Republic of China: Informal Telephone
Consultation With the International Trade
Commission’’ (August 2, 2013).
6 See Letter to Irving A. Williamson, Chairman,
U.S. International Trade Commission, ‘‘Small
Diameter Graphite Electrodes From the People’s
Republic of China: Notification of Affirmative
Preliminary Determination of Circumvention of the
Antidumping Duty Order’’ (August 2, 2013).
7 See Letter from Lisa R. Barton, ‘‘Small Diameter
Graphite Electrodes From China, Commerce
Anticircumvention Inquiry A–570–929’’ (August
16, 2013).
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Department) determines that imports
from the People’s Republic of China
(PRC) of graphite electrodes, produced
and/or exported by Sinosteel Jilin
Carbon Co., Ltd. and Jilin Carbon Import
& Export Company (collectively, Jilin
Carbon), with an actual or nominal
diameter of 17 inches, and otherwise
meeting the description of in-scope
merchandise, constitute merchandise
altered in form or appearance in such
minor respects that it should be
included within the scope of the Order,
pursuant to section 781(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).1
DATES: Effective Date: September 16,
2013.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:46 Sep 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The small diameter graphite electrodes
subject to the order is currently
classifiable under the following
subheadings of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS):
8545.11.0010,8 3801.10,9 and
8545.11.0020.10 The HTSUS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes. A
full description of the scope of the order
is contained in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum, which is hereby adopted
by this notice. The written description
is dispositive.
The Issues and Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Import
Administration’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS).
IA ACCESS is available to registered
users at https://iaaccess.trade.gov and is
available to all parties in the Central
Records Unit, room 7046 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the
Issues and Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly on the Internet at
https://www.trade.gov/ia/. The signed
Issues and Decision Memorandum and
the electronic versions of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
Scope of the Anticircumvention Inquiry
The merchandise subject to this
anticircumvention inquiry consists of
graphite electrodes from the PRC,
produced and/or exported by Jilin
Carbon, Beijing Fangda Carbon-Tech
Co., Ltd. and Fangda Carbon New
Material Co., Ltd., and Fushun Jinly
Petrochemical Carbon, with diameters
8 The scope described in the Order refers to the
HTSUS subheading 8545.11.0000. Petitioners have
informed the Department that, starting in 2010,
imports of small diameter graphite electrodes are
classified in the HTSUS under subheading
8545.11.0010 and imports of large diameter graphite
electrodes are classified under subheading
8545.11.0020. See Letter from Petitioners, ‘‘Small
Diameter Graphite Electrodes: Request for Scope/
Circumvention Ruling’’ (April 5, 2012) at 5.
9 HTSUS subheading 3801.10 was added to the
scope of the Order based on a determination in a
prior anticircumvention proceeding. See Small
Diameter Graphite Electrodes From the People’s
Republic of China: Affirmative Final Determination
of Circumvention of the Antidumping Duty Order,
77 FR 47596 (August 9, 2012).
10 We have added this HTSUS subheading in
order to capture the merchandise subject to this
inquiry. See Memorandum from Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration,
‘‘Anticircumvention Inquiry Regarding the
Antidumping Duty Order on Small Diameter
Graphite Electrodes From the People’s Republic of
China: Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Final Determination of the Anticircumvention
Inquiry’’ dated concurrently with this notice (Issues
and Decision Memorandum) at Comment 2.
E:\FR\FM\16SEN1.SGM
16SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 179 (Monday, September 16, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56861-56864]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-22475]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-909]
Certain Steel Nails From the People's Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of the Fourth Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (``Department'') is conducting the
fourth administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain
steel nails (``nails'') from the People's Republic of China
(``PRC'').\1\ The Department has preliminarily determined that sales
have been made below normal value (``NV'') by the respondents examined
during the period of review (``POR''), August 1, 2011, through July 31,
2012. If these preliminary results are adopted in the final results,
the Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(``CBP'') to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of
subject merchandise during the POR. Interested parties are invited to
comment on these preliminary results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Steel Nails
From the People's Republic of China, 73 FR 44961 (August 1, 2008).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: September 16, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Javier Barrientos or Matthew Renkey,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 9, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone 202-482-2243
or 202-482-2312, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the order includes certain steel nails
having a shaft length up to 12 inches. Certain steel nails subject to
the order are currently classified under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule
of the United States (``HTSUS'') subheadings 7317.00.55, 7317.00.65 and
7317.00.75. While the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience
and customs
[[Page 56862]]
purposes, the written description of the scope of the order is
dispositive.
For a full description of the scope, see ``Certain Steel Nails From
the People's Republic of China: Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary
Results of the 2011-2012 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,''
dated concurrently with this notice (``Preliminary Decision
Memorandum'').
Methodology
The Department has conducted these reviews in accordance with
section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``Act'').
Constructed export prices and export prices have been calculated in
accordance with section 772 of the Act. Because the PRC is a nonmarket
economy (``NME'') within the meaning of section 771(18) of the Act, NV
has been calculated in accordance with section 773(c) of the Act. For a
full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum, which is dated concurrently with these
results and hereby adopted by this notice. The Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via
Import Administration's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (``IA ACCESS''). IA ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://iaaccess.trade.gov, and is available to all
parties in the Central Records Unit, room 7046 of the main Department
of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the
internet at https://www.trade.gov/ia/. The signed Preliminary Decision
Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Preliminary Results of Review
The Department preliminarily determines that the following
weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period August 1, 2011,
through July 31, 2012:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-average
Exporter margin (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Stanley \2\..................................... 22.90
(2) JISCO \3\....................................... 43.45
(3) Cana (Tianjin) Hardware Industrial Co., Ltd..... 26.41
(4) Chiieh Yung Metal Ind. Corp..................... 26.41
(5) China Staple Enterprise (Tianjin) Co., Ltd...... 26.41
(6) Dezhou Hualude Hardware Products Co., Ltd....... 26.41
(7) Hebei Cangzhou New Century Foreign Trade Co., 26.41
Ltd................................................
(8) Huanghua Jinhai Hardware Products Co., Ltd...... 26.41
(9) Huanghua Xionghua Hardware Products Co., Ltd.... 26.41
(10) Nanjing Yuechang Hardware Co., Ltd............. 26.41
(11) Qingdao D&L Group Ltd.......................... 26.41
(12) SDC International Australia Pty., Ltd.......... 26.41
(13) Shandong Dinglong Import & Export Co., Ltd..... 26.41
(14) Shandong Oriental Cherry Hardware Group Co., 26.41
Ltd................................................
(15) Shandong Oriental Cherry Hardware Import and 26.41
Export Co., Ltd....................................
(16) Shanghai Curvet Hardware Products Co., Ltd..... 26.41
(17) Shanghai Yueda Nails Industry Co., Ltd......... 26.41
(18) Shanxi Hairui Trade Co., Ltd................... 26.41
(19) Shanxi Pioneer Hardware Industrial Co., Ltd.... 26.41
(20) Shanxi Tianli Industries Co., Ltd.............. 26.41
(21) S-Mart (Tianjin) Technology Development Co., 26.41
Ltd................................................
v22) Suntec Industries Co., Ltd..................... 26.41
(23) Suzhou Xingya Nail Co., Ltd.................... 26.41
(24) Tianjin Jinchi Metal Products Co., Ltd......... 26.41
(25) Tianjin Jinghai County Hongli Industry & 26.41
Business Co., Ltd..................................
(26) Tianjin Lianda Group Co., Ltd.................. 26.41
(27) Tianjin Universal Machinery Imp & Exp 26.41
Corporation........................................
(28) Tianjin Zhonglian Metals Ware Co., Ltd......... 26.41
(29) Xi'an Metals & Minerals Import and Export Co., 26.41
Ltd................................................
(30) Zhejiang Gem-Chun Hardware Accessory Co., Ltd.. 26.41
PRC-Wide Rate....................................... 118.04
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The Stanley Works (Langfang) Fastening Systems Co., Ltd.
(``Stanley Langfang''), and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (``SBD'')
(collectively, ``Stanley'').
\3\ Qingdao JISCO Co., Ltd. and ECO System Corporation (d/b/a
JISCO Corporation) (collectively, ``JISCO'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure, Public Comment and Opportunity To Request a Hearing
The Department intends to disclose the calculations used in our
analysis to parties in these reviews within five days of the date of
publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Interested parties are invited to comment on the preliminary
results of this review. However, we plan to issue post-preliminary
supplemental questionnaires and, therefore, will be extending the case
brief deadline. The Department will inform interested parties of the
updated briefing schedule when it has been confirmed.\4\ Rebuttals to
case briefs, which must be limited to issues raised in the case briefs,
must be filed within five days after the time limit for filing case
briefs.\5\ Parties who submit arguments are requested to submit with
the argument (a) a statement of the issue, (b) a brief summary of the
argument, and (c) a table of authorities.\6\ Parties submitting briefs
should do so pursuant to the Department's electronic filing system, IA
ACCESS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii).
\5\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1)-(2).
\6\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2), (d)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Any interested party may request a hearing within 30 days of
publication of
[[Page 56863]]
this notice.\7\ Hearing requests should contain the following
information: (1) The party's name, address, and telephone number; (2)
the number of participants; and (3) a list of the issues to be
discussed. Oral presentations will be limited to issues raised in the
briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, parties will be notified of
the time and date for the hearing to be held at the U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC
20230.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
\8\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department intends to issue the final results of this
administrative review, which will include the results of our analysis
of all issues raised in the case briefs, within 120 days of publication
of these preliminary results in the Federal Register, pursuant to
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
Deadline for Submission of Publicly Available Surrogate Value
Information
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.301(c)(3)(ii), the deadline for
submission of publicly available information to value the factors of
production under 19 CFR 351.408(c) is 20 days after the date of
publication of the preliminary results. In accordance with 19 CFR
351.301(c)(1), if an interested party submits factual information less
than 10 days before or on the applicable deadline for submission of
such factual information, an interested party may submit factual
information to rebut, clarify, or correct the factual information no
later than ten days after such factual information is served on the
interested party. However, the Department generally will not accept in
the rebuttal submission additional or alternative surrogate value
(``SV'') information not previously on the record, if the deadline for
submission of SV information has passed.\9\ Furthermore, the Department
generally will not accept business proprietary information in either
the SV submissions or the rebuttals thereto, as the regulation
regarding the submission of SVs allows only for the submission of
publicly available information.\10\ Finally, for each piece of factual
information submitted with SV rebuttal comments, the interested party
must provide a written explanation of what information that is already
on the record of the ongoing proceeding that the factual information is
rebutting, clarifying, or correcting.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Glycine from the People's Republic of China: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final
Rescission, in Part, 72 FR 58809 (October 17, 2007), and
accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 2.
\10\ See 19 CFR 351.301(c)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rates
Upon issuance of the final results, the Department will determine,
and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries
covered by this review.\11\ The Department intends to issue assessment
instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication date of the final
results of this review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b) .
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For assessment purposes, the Department applied the assessment rate
calculation method adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of
the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain
Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14,
2012). For any individually examined respondent whose weighted average
dumping margin is above de minimis (i.e., 0.50 percent) in the final
results of this review, the Department will calculate importer-specific
assessment rates on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of
dumping calculated for the importer's examined sales to the total
entered value of sales, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Where
an importer- (or customer-) specific ad valorem rate is greater than de
minimis, the Department will instruct CBP to collect the appropriate
duties at the time of liquidation.\12\ Where either a respondent's
weighted average dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or an importer-
(or customer-) specific ad valorem is zero or de minimis, the
Department will instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate entries without
regard to antidumping duties.\13\ For the respondents that were not
selected for individual examination in this administrative review and
that qualified for a separate rate, the assessment rate will be based
on the average of the mandatory respondents.\14\ We intend to instruct
CBP to liquidate entries containing subject merchandise exported by the
PRC-wide entity at the PRC-wide rate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
\13\ See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
\14\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department recently announced a refinement to its assessment
practice in NME cases. Pursuant to this refinement in practice, for
entries that were not reported in the U.S. sales databases submitted by
companies individually examined during the administrative review, the
Department will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide
rate. Additionally, if the Department determines that an exporter had
no shipments of the subject merchandise, any suspended entries that
entered under that exporter's case number (i.e., at that exporter's
rate) will be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Non-Market
Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties,
76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of these reviews for shipments of the
subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided by
sections 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the companies listed above
that have a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be that
established in the final results of these reviews (except, if the rate
is zero or de minimis, then zero cash deposit will be required); (2)
for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters not
listed above that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing
exporter-specific rate; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject
merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate,
the cash deposit rate will be that for the PRC-wide entity; and (4) for
all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received
their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to
the PRC exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further
notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during the POR. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the Department's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
This preliminary determination is issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
[[Page 56864]]
Dated: September 3, 2013.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
1. Case History
2. Scope of the Order
3. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments
4. Non-Market Economy Country Status
5. Separate Rates
6. Separate Rate Calculation for Companies Not Individually Examined
7. PRC-Wide Entity
8. Facts Available
9. Surrogate Country and Surrogate Value Data
10. Date of Sale
11. Determination of Comparison Method
12. Results of the Differential Pricing Analysis
13. Comparisons to Normal Value
14. U.S. Price
15. Normal Value
16. Factor Valuations
17. Currency Conversion
[FR Doc. 2013-22475 Filed 9-13-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P