Heavy-Duty Engine and Vehicle and Nonroad Technical Amendments, 56171 [C1-2013-19880]
Download as PDF
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 177 / Thursday, September 12, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
class downgrade, and change of
community of license of Station
KQHN(FM) from Magnolia, Arkansas, to
Oil City, Louisiana. The document finds
that the Bureau did not err in approving
the relocation of this FM station.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andrew J. Rhodes, Media Bureau, (202)
418–2700.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
synopsis of the Commission’s
Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC
13–114, MB Docket No. 02–199, RM–
10514, adopted August 14, 2013, and
released August 16, 2013. The full text
of this document is available for
inspection and copying during normal
business hours in the FCC Reference
Information Center (Room CY–A257),
445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC
20554. The complete text of this
document may also be purchased from
the Commission’s copy contractor, Best
Copy and Printing, Inc., Portals II, 445
12th Street SW., Room CY–B402,
Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1–
800–378–3160 or www.BCPIWEB.com.
In the Report and Order in this
proceeding, the Bureau granted a
Petition for Rule Making filed by
Cumulus Licensing, LLC’s predecessor
in interest (‘‘Cumulus’’) as licensee of
Station KQHN(FM) for a downgrade in
class of channel, and change of
community of license for the station
from Channel 300C1 at Magnolia,
Arkansas, to Channel 300C2 at Oil City,
Louisiana, See 70 FR 19337, April 13,
2005. In the Memorandum Opinion and
Order, the Bureau affirmed the grant
and concluded that the relocation of the
station to Oil City did not constitute a
‘‘move-in’’ to the Shreveport, Louisiana,
Urbanized Area because Cumulus had
demonstrated that Oil City is
sufficiently independent of the
Shreveport Urbanized Area to warrant a
first local service preference under the
then-existing Tuck test. See 69 FR 8333,
February 24, 2004.
On review, the Commission finds that
the Bureau did not err in (1)
determining that Oil City was
independent of Shreveport; (2)
declining to adopt Acceess.1’s proposed
processing policy of requiring a
certification by a community of license
modification proponent that it will not
select a site that would provide
substantial service to an urbanized area;
and (3) finding that the proposed
reallotment would serve the public
interest. The Commission upholds those
decisions for the reasons stated in the
Memorandum Opinion and Order.
However, the Commission states that
some additional discussion is warranted
regarding the remaining issues raised by
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:55 Sep 11, 2013
Jkt 229001
Access.1. Most importantly, the
Commission finds that Cumulus had not
engaged in misrepresentation and/or
had not shown a lack of candor as to
whether its proposal would be a ‘‘movein’’ to the Shreveport Urbanized Area.
The Commission explains that under
the then-existing procedures, Cumulus
was permitted to specify at the rule
making stage reference coordinates of a
theoretical fully spaced site and later in
the implementing application to specify
a different site. Absent any extrinsic
evidence to the contrary, which
Access.1 did not produce, the
Commission concludes that a
misrepresentation or lack of candor
allegation based on the specification of
a different application site is
speculative.
This document is not subject to the
Congressional Review Act. (The
Commission, is, therefore, not required
to submit a copy of the Memorandum
Opinion and Order to GAO, pursuant to
the Congressional Review Act, see 5
U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A) because the
Application for Review was denied.)
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–22211 Filed 9–11–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 1037, 1039, 1042, and
1068
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
49 CFR Part 535
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2012–0102; NHTSA–2012–
0152; FRL 9900–11–OAR]
RIN 2060–AR48; 2127–AL31
Heavy-Duty Engine and Vehicle and
Nonroad Technical Amendments
Correction
In rule document 2013–19880
appearing on pages 49963 through
49967 in the issue of Friday, August 16,
2013, make the following correction.
1. On page 49965, in the second
column, the equation beneath the first
paragraph is corrected to read as set
forth below.
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
56171
§ 1037.104 Exhaust emission standards
for CO2, CH4, and N2O for heavy-duty
vehicles at or below 14,000 pounds GVWR
[Corrected]
Force ¥ (mass × acceleration) = F0 + F1
· (velocity) + F2 · (velocity)2
[FR Doc. C1–2013–19880 Filed 9–11–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 622
[Docket No. 130402313–3748–02]
RIN 0648–BD15
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of
Mexico, and South Atlantic; Queen
Conch Fishery of Puerto Rico and the
U.S. Virgin Islands; Regulatory
Amendment 2
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
NMFS issues this final rule to
implement Regulatory Amendment 2 to
the Fishery Management Plan (FMP) for
the Queen Conch Resources of Puerto
Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI)
(Regulatory Amendment 2), as prepared
by the Caribbean Fishery Management
Council (Council). This final rule
revises the commercial trip limit for
queen conch in the Caribbean exclusive
economic zone (EEZ) to be compatible
with the trip limit in USVI territorial
waters. The purpose of this provision is
to improve the compatibility of Federal
and USVI territorial regulations for
queen conch in order to facilitate
enforcement efforts while ensuring the
long-term health of the queen conch
resource. This final rule also changes
the regulations specifying the queen
conch fishing season to correct an
inadvertent change to the text that
occurred in a prior rulemaking. The
revision better reflects the original and
current intent of the Council.
DATES: This rule is effective October 15,
2013.
ADDRESSES: Electronic copies of
Regulatory Amendment 2, which
includes an environmental assessment,
a Regulatory Flexibility Act analysis,
and a regulatory impact review (RIR),
may be obtained from the Southeast
Regional Office Web site at: https://
sero.nmfs.noaa.gov/.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Maria del Mar Lopez, Southeast
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\12SER1.SGM
12SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 177 (Thursday, September 12, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 56171]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: C1-2013-19880]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 1037, 1039, 1042, and 1068
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
49 CFR Part 535
[EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0102; NHTSA-2012-0152; FRL 9900-11-OAR]
RIN 2060-AR48; 2127-AL31
Heavy-Duty Engine and Vehicle and Nonroad Technical Amendments
Correction
In rule document 2013-19880 appearing on pages 49963 through 49967
in the issue of Friday, August 16, 2013, make the following correction.
1. On page 49965, in the second column, the equation beneath the
first paragraph is corrected to read as set forth below.
Sec. 1037.104 Exhaust emission standards for CO2, CH4, and N2O for
heavy-duty vehicles at or below 14,000 pounds GVWR [Corrected]
Force - (mass x acceleration) = F0 + F1 [middot] (velocity) + F2
[middot] (velocity)2
[FR Doc. C1-2013-19880 Filed 9-11-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D