Small Diameter Graphite Electrodes From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2011-2012, 55680-55683 [2013-22028]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
55680
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 176 / Wednesday, September 11, 2013 / Notices
In a letter dated August 23, 2013,
BTIC withdrew its request for review of
itself. No other parties requested a
review.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the order
is seamless steel cylinders designed for
storage or transport of compressed or
liquefied gas (‘‘high pressure steel
cylinders’’). High pressure steel
cylinders are fabricated of chrome alloy
steel including, but not limited to,
chromium-molybdenum steel or
chromium magnesium steel, and have
permanently impressed into the steel,
either before or after importation, the
symbol of a U.S. Department of
Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(‘‘DOT’’) approved high pressure steel
cylinder manufacturer, as well as an
approved DOT type marking of DOT 3A,
3AX, 3AA, 3AAX, 3B, 3E, 3HT, 3T, or
DOT–E (followed by a specific
exemption number) in accordance with
the requirements of sections 178.36
through 178.68 of Title 49 of the Code
of Federal Regulations, or any
subsequent amendments thereof. High
pressure steel cylinders covered by the
investigation have a water capacity up
to 450 liters, and a gas capacity ranging
from 8 to 702 cubic feet, regardless of
corresponding service pressure levels
and regardless of physical dimensions,
finish or coatings.
Excluded from the scope of the order
are high pressure steel cylinders
manufactured to UN–ISO–9809–1 and 2
specifications and permanently
impressed with ISO or UN symbols.
Also excluded from the investigation are
acetylene cylinders, with or without
internal porous mass, and permanently
impressed with 8A or 8AL in
accordance with DOT regulations.
Merchandise covered by the order is
classified in the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States
(‘‘HTSUS’’) under subheading
7311.00.00.30. Subject merchandise
may also enter under HTSUS
subheadings 7311.00.00.60 or
7311.00.00.90. Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the merchandise
under the investigation is dispositive.
Rescission of Administrative Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the
Secretary will rescind an administrative
review, in whole or in part, if the party
that requested the review withdraws the
Notice. However, because June 30, 2013, was a
Sunday, BITC filed its request for review on the
next business day, July 1, 2013. See 19 CFR
351.303(b).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:50 Sep 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
request within 90 days of the date of
publication of the notice of initiation of
the requested review. BTIC timely
withdrew its request for review of itself.
Because no other party requested a
review, pursuant to 19 CFR
351.213(d)(1), the Department is
rescinding the entire administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
on high pressure steel cylinders from
the PRC for the period December 15,
2011, to May 31, 2013.
Dated: September 5, 2013.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
Assessment
Small Diameter Graphite Electrodes
From the People’s Republic of China:
Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2011–2012
The Department will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’)
to assess antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries. Antidumping duties
shall be assessed at rates equal to the
cash deposit of estimated antidumping
duties required at the time of entry, or
withdrawal from warehouse, for
consumption, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department
intends to issue assessment instructions
directly to CBP 15 days after the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register, if appropriate.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a reminder to
importers of their responsibility under
19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective orders (‘‘APO’’) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues
to govern business proprietary
information in this segment of the
proceeding. Timely written notification
of the return or destruction of APO
materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a violation
which is subject to sanction.
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with section 751(a) and
777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[FR Doc. 2013–22126 Filed 9–10–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–929]
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On March 8, 2013, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary
results of the administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on small
diameter graphite electrodes from the
People’s Republic of China (the PRC).
The period of review (POR) is February
1, 2011, through January 31, 2012. For
the final results, we continue to find
that certain companies covered by this
review have not made sales of subject
merchandise at less than normal value,
and that other companies are now part
of the PRC-wide entity.
DATES: Effective Date: September 11,
2013.
AGENCY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dmitry Vladimirov or Minoo Hatten,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 1, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–0665 or (202) 482–
1690, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On March 8, 2013, the Department
published the preliminary results of the
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on small
diameter graphite electrodes from the
PRC.1 We received case and rebuttal
briefs with respect to the Preliminary
Results.
We have conducted this
administrative review in accordance
with section 751 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act).
1 See Small Diameter Graphite Electrodes From
the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and
Partial Rescission; 2011–2012, 78 FR 14964 (March
8, 2013) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
E:\FR\FM\11SEN1.SGM
11SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 176 / Wednesday, September 11, 2013 / Notices
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the order
includes all small diameter graphite
electrodes with a nominal or actual
diameter of 400 millimeters (16 inches)
or less and graphite pin joining systems
for small diameter graphite electrodes.
Small diameter graphite electrodes and
graphite pin joining systems for small
diameter graphite electrodes that are
subject to the order are currently
classified under the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
subheadings 8545.11.0010 and 3801.10.
The HTSUS numbers are provided for
convenience and customs purposes. A
full description of the scope of the order
is contained in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum,2 which is hereby
adopted by this notice. The written
description of the scope of the order is
dispositive.
Determination of No Shipments
UK Carbon and Graphite Co., Ltd.
(UKCG) timely filed a ‘‘no shipment’’
certification stating that it had no
entries of subject merchandise during
the POR.3 We subsequently confirmed
with U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) the ‘‘no shipment’’
claim made by UKCG.4 Based on the
certifications by UKCG and CBP’s
confirmation, we determine that UKCG
did not have any reviewable entries of
subject merchandise during the POR,
and will issue appropriate instructions
that are consistent with our ‘‘automatic
assessment’’ clarification, for these final
results.5
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case briefs by
parties to this administrative review are
addressed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum. A list of the issues raised
is attached to this notice as Appendix 1.
The Issues and Decision Memorandum
is a public document and is on file
electronically via Import
Administration’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS).
Access to IA ACCESS is available to
2 See Memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant
Secretary for Import Administration, From
Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations,
entitled ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review of Small Diameter Graphite Electrodes from
the People’s Republic of China’’ dated concurrently
with this notice (Issues and Decision
Memorandum).
3 See Letter from UKCG, dated May 29, 2012.
4 See CBP inquiry message 3207305, dated July
26, 2013.
5 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76
FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:50 Sep 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
registered users at https://
iaaccess.trade.gov and is available to all
parties in the Central Records Unit,
room 7046 of the main Department of
Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly on the Import Administration
Web site at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn/
index.html. The signed Issues and
Decision Memorandum and the
electronic versions of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
Separate Rate for a Non-Selected
Company
In the Preliminary Results, we found
that Xinghe County Muzi Carbon Co.,
Ltd. (Muzi Carbon) demonstrated its
eligibility for separate-rate status.6 We
have not received any information since
then that would lead us to reconsider
our preliminary finding. Therefore, we
continue to determine that Muzi Carbon
is eligible for separate-rate status.
The PRC-Wide Entity
In the Preliminary Results, we
determined that four companies 7 for
which a review was requested did not
demonstrate their eligibility for a
separate rate and are properly
considered part of the PRC-wide entity.8
We have not received any information
since then that would lead us to
reconsider our preliminary
determination with respect to these four
companies. Therefore, we continue to
find that these four companies should
be treated as part of the PRC-wide entity
and subject to the PRC-wide entity rate.
In the Preliminary Results, we stated
our intent not to rescind the review for
certain companies that remain a part of
the PRC-wide entity, notwithstanding
timely withdrawal of review requests for
these companies, because the PRC-wide
entity remains under review.9 Since the
Preliminary Results, we did not receive
any information that would cause us to
revisit our preliminary determination
not to rescind the review with respect
to these companies.
Consistent with our practice, we will
issue appropriate instructions to CBP for
any entries made by the companies that
remain a part of the PRC-wide entity
during the POR.
6 See Preliminary Results, and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 6–7.
7 These companies are Dechang Shida Carbon Co.,
Ltd., Shida Carbon Group, Sichuan Shida Trading
Co., Ltd., and Sichuan Guanghan Shida Carbon Co.,
Ltd.
8 See Preliminary Results, and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 8.
9 See id., 78 FR at 14966.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
55681
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our analysis of the
comments received, we have revised our
calculation of the surrogate financial
ratios used in the margin calculations
for mandatory respondents, Fangda
Group 10 and Fushun Jinly
Petrochemical Carbon Co., Ltd. (Fushun
Jinly).11 This revision did not change
the weighted-average margins we
calculated in the Preliminary Results.
Final Results of the Review
We determine that the following
percentage weighted-average dumping
margins exist for the period February 1,
2011, through January 31, 2012:
Company
Fushun Jinly Petrochemical
Carbon Co., Ltd. ...................
Beijing Fangda Carbon Tech
Co., Ltd. ................................
Chengdu Rongguang Carbon
Co., Ltd. ................................
Fangda Carbon New Material
Co., Ltd. ................................
Fushun Carbon Co., Ltd. ..........
Hefei Carbon Co., Ltd. .............
Xinghe County Muzi Carbon
Co., Ltd. ................................
PRC-wide entity * ......................
Margin
(percent)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
159.64
* The PRC-Wide entity includes the companies listed in Appendix 2.
Assessment
The Department will determine, and
CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on
all appropriate entries covered by this
review pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b).
We intend to issue assessment
instructions to CBP 15 days after the
date of publication of the final results of
review.
For Fushun Jinly, Muzi Carbon, and
the five companies comprising the
Fangda Group we will instruct CBP to
liquidate all entries during the POR
without regard to antidumping duties
because their weighted-average
10 We refer to the Fangda Group as a single entity
pursuant to 19 CFR 351.401(f)(1). See Small
Diameter Graphite Electrodes From the People’s
Republic of China: Preliminary Determination of
Sales at Less Than Fair Value, Postponement of
Final Determination, and Affirmative Preliminary
Determination of Critical Circumstances, in Part, 73
FR 49408, 49411–12 (August 21, 2008) (where we
collapsed the following individual members of the
Fangda Group: Beijing Fangda Carbon Tech Co.,
Ltd., Chengdu Rongguang Carbon Co., Ltd., Fangda
Carbon New Material Co., Ltd., Fushun Carbon Co.,
Ltd., and Hefei Carbon Co., Ltd.), unchanged in
Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair
Value and Affirmative Determination of Critical
Circumstances: Small Diameter Graphite Electrodes
from the People’s Republic of China, 74 FR 2049
(January 14, 2009).
11 See accompanying Issues and Decision
Memorandum at Comment 6.
E:\FR\FM\11SEN1.SGM
11SEN1
55682
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 176 / Wednesday, September 11, 2013 / Notices
dumping margins in these final results
are zero.12
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of these final results of
review for all shipments of the subject
merchandise entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or
after the publication date as provided by
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) No
cash deposit will be required for subject
merchandise exported by Fushun Jinly,
Muzi Carbon, and the five companies
comprising the Fangda Group because
they received a rate of 0.00 percent in
the final results of this administrative
review; (2) for previously investigated or
reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters
not listed above that received a separate
rate in a prior segment of this
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the existing exporterspecific rate; (3) for all PRC exporters of
subject merchandise that have not been
found to be entitled to a separate rate,
the cash deposit rate will be that for the
PRC-wide entity; and (4) for all non-PRC
exporters of subject merchandise which
have not received their own rate, the
cash deposit rate will be the rate
applicable to the PRC exporter that
supplied that non-PRC exporter. These
deposit requirements shall remain in
effect until further notice.
Notifications
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Secretary’s presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping
duties.
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
12 See Antidumping Proceeding: Calculation of
the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty
Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8103
(February 14, 2012).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:50 Sep 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
Disclosure
We intend to disclose the calculations
performed within five days of the date
of publication of this notice to parties in
this proceeding, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.224(b).
These final results of review are
issued and published in accordance
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the
Act.
Dated: September 4, 2013.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
Appendix 1
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
Comment 1: U.S. Sales Attributable to
Circumvention Determination
Comment 2: Tolling Data
Comment 3: Reconciliation of Factors of
Production
Comment 4: Differential Pricing and Targeted
Dumping Analyses
Comment 5: Rate for Non-Selected
Companies
Comment 6: Surrogate Financial Ratios
Appendix 2
Firms for which we are not rescinding the
review even though we received timely
withdrawal requests because these
companies are part of the PRC entity as they
did not have a separate rate from a prior
segment.
1. 5-Continent Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd.
2. Acclcarbon Co., Ltd.
3. Allied Carbon (China) Co., Limited
4. Anssen Metallurgy Group Co., Ltd.
5. AMGL
6. Apex Maritime (Dalian) Co., Ltd.
7. Asahi Fine Carbon (Dalian) Co., Ltd.
8. Beijing Xinchengze Inc.
9. Beijing Xincheng Sci-Tech. Development
Inc.
10. Chang Cheng Chang Electrode Co., Ltd.
11. Chengdelh Carbonaceous Elements
Factory
12. Chengdu Jia Tang Corp.
13. China Industrial Mineral & Metals Group
14. China Shaanxi Richbond Imp. & Exp.
Industrial Corp. Ltd.
15. China Xingyong Carbon Co., Ltd.
16. CIMM Group Co., Ltd.
17. Dalian Carbon & Graphite Corporation
18. Dalian Hongrui Carbon Co., Ltd.
19. Dalian Honest International Trade Co.,
Ltd.
20. Dalian Horton International Trading Co.,
Ltd.
21. Dalian LST Metallurgy Co., Ltd.
22. Dalian Shuangji Co., Ltd.
23. Datong Carbon
24. Datong Carbon Plant
25. Datong Xincheng Carbon Co., Ltd.
26. De Well Container Shipping Corp.
27. Dewell Group
28. Dignity Success Investment Trading Co.,
Ltd.
29. Double Dragon Metals and Mineral Tools
Co., Ltd.
30. Fangda Lanzhou Carbon Joint Stock
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Company Co. Ltd.
31. Foset Co., Ltd.
32. Fushun Orient Carbon Co., Ltd.
33. Guangdong Highsun Yongye (Group) Co.,
Ltd.
34. Haimen Shuguang Carbon Industry Co.,
Ltd.
35. Handan Hanbo Material Co., Ltd.
36. Hebei Long Great Wall Electrode Co., Ltd.
37. Heilongjiang Xinyuan Metacarbon
Company, Ltd.
38. Henan Sanli Carbon Products Co., Ltd.
39. Hopes (Beijing) International Co., Ltd.
40. Hunan Mec Machinery and Electronics
Imp. & Exp. Corp.
41. Hunan Yinguang Carbon Factory Co., Ltd.
42. Inner Mongolia QingShan Special
Graphite and Carbon Co., Ltd.
43. Inner Mongolia Xinghe County Hongyuan
Electrical Carbon Factory
44. Jiang Long Carbon
45. Jiangsu Yafei Carbon Co., Ltd.
46. Jichun International Trade Co., Ltd. of
Jilin Province
47. Jiexiu Juyuan Carbon Co., Ltd.
48. Jiexiu Ju-Yuan & Coaly Co., Ltd.
49. Jilin Carbon Graphite Material Co., Ltd.
50. Jilin Carbon Import and Export Company
51. Jilin Songjiang Carbon Co Ltd.
52. Jinneng Group Co., Ltd.
53. Jinyu Thermo-Electric Material Co., Ltd.
54. Kaifeng Carbon Company Ltd.
55. KASY Logistics (Tianjin) Co., Ltd.
56. Kimwan New Carbon Technology and
Development Co., Ltd.
57. Kingstone Industrial Group Ltd.
58. L & T Group Co., Ltd.
59. Laishui Long Great Wall Electrode Co.
Ltd.
60. Lanzhou Carbon Co., Ltd.
61. Lanzhou Carbon Import & Export Corp.
62. Lanzhou Hailong Technology
63. Lanzhou Ruixin Industrial Material Co.,
Ltd.
64. LH Carbon Factory of Chengde
65. Lianxing Carbon Qinghai Co., Ltd.
66. Lianxing Carbon Science Institute
67. Lianxing Carbon (Shandong) Co., Ltd.
68. Lianyungang Jinli Carbon Co., Ltd.
69. Liaoyang Carbon Co. Ltd.
70. Linyi County Lubei Carbon Co., Ltd.
71. Maoming Yongye (Group) Co., Ltd.
72. MBI Beijing International Trade Co., Ltd.
73. Nantong Yangtze Carbon Corp. Ltd.
74. Orient (Dalian) Carbon Resources
Developing Co., Ltd.
75. Orient Star Transport International, Ltd.
76. Peixian Longxiang Foreign Trade Co. Ltd.
77. Qingdao Grand Graphite Products Co.,
Ltd.
78. Quingdao Haosheng Metals & Minerals
Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd.
79. Qingdao Liyikun Carbon Development
Co., Ltd.
80. Qingdao Likun Graphite Co., Ltd.
81. Qingdao Ruizhen Carbon Co., Ltd.
82. Ray Group Ltd.
83. Rex International Forwarding Co., Ltd.
84. Rt Carbon Co., Ltd.
85. Ruitong Carbon Co., Ltd.
86. Shandong Basan Carbon Plant
87. Shandong Zibo Continent Carbon Factory
88. Shanghai Carbon International Trade Co.,
Ltd.
89. Shanghai P.W. International Ltd.
90. Shanghai Shen-Tech Graphite Material
E:\FR\FM\11SEN1.SGM
11SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 176 / Wednesday, September 11, 2013 / Notices
Co., Ltd.
91. Shanghai Topstate International Trading
Co., Ltd.
92. Shanxi Datong Energy Development Co.,
Ltd.
93. Shanxi Foset Carbon Co. Ltd.
94. Shanxi Jiexiu Import and Export Co., Ltd.
95. Shanxi Jinneng Group Co., Ltd.
96. Shanxi Yunheng Graphite Electrode Co.,
Ltd.
97. Shijaizhuang Carbon Co., Ltd.
98. Sichuan 5-Continent Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd.
99. Sichuan GMT International Inc.
100. Sinicway International Logistics Ltd.
101. Sinosteel Anhui Co., Ltd.
102. Sinosteel Jilin Carbon Imp. & Exp. Co.,
Ltd.
103. Sinosteel Sichuan Co., Ltd.
104. SMMC Group Co., Ltd.
105. Sure Mega (Hong Kong) Ltd.
106. Tangshan Kimwan Special Carbon &
Graphite Co., Ltd.
107. Tengchong Carbon Co., Ltd.
108. Tianjin (Teda) Iron & Steel Trade Co.,
Ltd.
109. Tianjin Kimwan Carbon Technology and
Development Co., Ltd.
110. Tianjin Yue Yang Industrial & Trading
Co., Ltd.
111. Tielong (Chengdu) Carbon Co., Ltd.
112. United Carbon Ltd.
113. United Trade Resources, Inc.
114. Weifang Lianxing Carbon Co., Ltd.
115. World Trade Metals & Minerals Co., Ltd.
116. XC Carbon Group
117. Xinyuan Carbon Co., Ltd.
118. Xuanhua Hongli Refractory and Mineral
Company
119. Xuchang Minmetals & Industry Co., Ltd.
120. Xuzhou Carbon Co., Ltd.
121. Xuzhou Electrode Factory
122. Yangzhou Qionghua Carbon Trading
Ltd.
123. Yixing Huaxin Imp & Exp Co. Ltd.
124. Youth Industry Co., Ltd.
125. Zhengzhou Jinyu Thermo-Electric
Material Co., Ltd.
126. Zibo Continent Carbon Factory
127. Zibo DuoCheng Trading Co., Ltd.
128. Zibo Lianxing Carbon Co., Ltd.
129. Zibo Wuzhou Tanshun Carbon Co., Ltd.
Companies that are now part of the PRC
entity because they did not demonstrate in
this review that they are entitled to a separate
rate.
1. Dechang Shida Carbon Co., Ltd.
2. Shida Carbon Group
3. Sichuan Shida Trading Co., Ltd.
4. Sichuan Guanghan Shida Carbon Co.,
Ltd.13
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
[FR Doc. 2013–22028 Filed 9–10–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
13 This company is the same entity as Guanghan
Shida Carbon Co., Ltd., for which this
administrative review was initiated. See Small
Diameter Graphite Electrodes from the People’s
Republic of China: Final Results of the
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 77 FR
40854, 40856 (July 11, 2012).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:50 Sep 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
National Sea Grant Advisory Board
National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration,
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of solicitation for
nominations for potential National Sea
Grant Advisory Board members and
notice of public meeting.
AGENCY:
This notice responds to
Section 209 of the Sea Grant Program
Improvement Act of 1976 (Pub. L. 94–
461, 33 U.S.C. 1128), which requires the
Secretary of Commerce to solicit
nominations at least once a year for
membership on the National Sea Grant
Advisory Board, a Federal Advisory
Committee that provides advice on the
implementation of the National Sea
Grant College Program. To apply for
membership to the Advisory Board
applicants should submit a current
resume as indicated in the ADDRESSES
section. A cover letter highlighting
specific areas of expertise relevant to the
purpose of the Board is helpful, but not
required. NOAA is an equal opportunity
employer.
This notice also sets forth the
schedule and proposed agenda of a
forthcoming meeting of the National Sea
Grant Advisory Board. Board members
will discuss and provide advice on the
National Sea Grant College Program in
the areas of program evaluation,
strategic planning, education and
extension, science and technology
programs, and other matters as
described in the agenda found on the
National Sea Grant College Program
Web site at https://seagrant.noaa.gov/
WhoWeAre/Leadership/
NationalSeaGrantAdvisoryBoard/
AdvisoryBoardUpcomingMeetings.aspx.
DATES: Solicitation of nominations is
open ended. Resumes may be sent to the
address specified at any time. The
announced meeting is scheduled for
Monday, September 23, 2013 from 10:00
a.m. to 5:00 p.m. EST and Tuesday,
September 24, 2013, from 9:00 a.m. to
4:00 p.m. EST.
Individuals Selected For Federal
Advisory Committee Membership: Upon
selection and agreement to serve on the
National Sea Grant Advisory Board, you
become a Special Government
Employee (SGE) of the United States
Government. 18 U.S.C. 202(a) an SGE(s)
is an officer or employee of an agency
who is retained, designated, appointed,
or employed to perform temporary
duties, with or without compensation,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
55683
not to exceed 130 days during any
period of 365 consecutive days, either
on a fulltime or intermittent basis.
Please be aware that after the selection
process is complete, applicants selected
to serve on the Board must complete the
following actions before they can be
appointed as a Board member:
(a) Security Clearance (on-line
Background Security Check process and
fingerprinting conducted through
NOAA Workforce Management); and (b)
Confidential Financial Disclosure
Report—As an SGE, you are required to
file a Confidential Financial Disclosure
Report to avoid involvement in a real or
apparent conflict of interest. You may
find the Confidential Financial
Disclosure Report at the following Web
site. https://www.oge.gov/Forms-Library/
OGE-Form-450-Confidential-FinancialDisclosure-Report/.
ADDRESSES: Nominations should be sent
to Ms. Elizabeth Ban, Designated
Federal Officer, National Sea Grant
College Program, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration, 1315 EastWest Highway, Room 11853, Silver
Spring, Maryland 20910, (301) 734–
1082.
The September meeting will be held
at Stone Laboratory, 878 Bayview
Avenue, Put-in-Bay, Ohio 43456.
Status: The meeting will be open to
public participation with a 15-minute
public comment period on Tuesday,
September 24 at 1:30 p.m. (check
agenda on Web site to confirm time).
The Board expects that public
statements presented at its meetings will
not be repetitive of previously
submitted verbal or written statements.
In general, each individual or group
making a verbal presentation will be
limited to a total time of three (3)
minutes. Written comments should be
received by the Designated Federal
Officer by Monday, September 16, 2013
to provide sufficient time for the Board
review. Written comments received after
Monday, September 16, 2013 will be
distributed to the Board, but may not be
reviewed prior to the meeting date.
Seats will be available on a first-come,
first-serve basis.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Elizabeth Ban, Designated Federal
Officer, National Sea Grant College
Program, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration, 1315 EastWest Highway, Room 11853; Silver
Spring, Maryland 20910, (301) 734–
1082.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Established by Section 209 of the Act
and as amended the National Sea Grant
College Program Amendments Act of
E:\FR\FM\11SEN1.SGM
11SEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 11, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55680-55683]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-22028]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-929]
Small Diameter Graphite Electrodes From the People's Republic of
China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2011-
2012
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On March 8, 2013, the Department of Commerce (the Department)
published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on small diameter graphite electrodes from the
People's Republic of China (the PRC). The period of review (POR) is
February 1, 2011, through January 31, 2012. For the final results, we
continue to find that certain companies covered by this review have not
made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value, and that
other companies are now part of the PRC-wide entity.
DATES: Effective Date: September 11, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dmitry Vladimirov or Minoo Hatten, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 1, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
0665 or (202) 482-1690, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On March 8, 2013, the Department published the preliminary results
of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on small
diameter graphite electrodes from the PRC.\1\ We received case and
rebuttal briefs with respect to the Preliminary Results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Small Diameter Graphite Electrodes From the People's
Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review and Partial Rescission; 2011-2012, 78 FR 14964
(March 8, 2013) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We have conducted this administrative review in accordance with
section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
[[Page 55681]]
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the order includes all small diameter
graphite electrodes with a nominal or actual diameter of 400
millimeters (16 inches) or less and graphite pin joining systems for
small diameter graphite electrodes. Small diameter graphite electrodes
and graphite pin joining systems for small diameter graphite electrodes
that are subject to the order are currently classified under the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheadings
8545.11.0010 and 3801.10. The HTSUS numbers are provided for
convenience and customs purposes. A full description of the scope of
the order is contained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum,\2\ which
is hereby adopted by this notice. The written description of the scope
of the order is dispositive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for
Import Administration, From Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations,
entitled ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Small Diameter Graphite
Electrodes from the People's Republic of China'' dated concurrently
with this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Determination of No Shipments
UK Carbon and Graphite Co., Ltd. (UKCG) timely filed a ``no
shipment'' certification stating that it had no entries of subject
merchandise during the POR.\3\ We subsequently confirmed with U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) the ``no shipment'' claim made by
UKCG.\4\ Based on the certifications by UKCG and CBP's confirmation, we
determine that UKCG did not have any reviewable entries of subject
merchandise during the POR, and will issue appropriate instructions
that are consistent with our ``automatic assessment'' clarification,
for these final results.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Letter from UKCG, dated May 29, 2012.
\4\ See CBP inquiry message 3207305, dated July 26, 2013.
\5\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case briefs by parties to this
administrative review are addressed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum. A list of the issues raised is attached to this notice as
Appendix 1. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Import Administration's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS).
Access to IA ACCESS is available to registered users at https://iaaccess.trade.gov and is available to all parties in the Central
Records Unit, room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly on the Import Administration Web site at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn/. The signed Issues and Decision
Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Separate Rate for a Non-Selected Company
In the Preliminary Results, we found that Xinghe County Muzi Carbon
Co., Ltd. (Muzi Carbon) demonstrated its eligibility for separate-rate
status.\6\ We have not received any information since then that would
lead us to reconsider our preliminary finding. Therefore, we continue
to determine that Muzi Carbon is eligible for separate-rate status.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Preliminary Results, and accompanying Preliminary
Decision Memorandum at 6-7.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The PRC-Wide Entity
In the Preliminary Results, we determined that four companies \7\
for which a review was requested did not demonstrate their eligibility
for a separate rate and are properly considered part of the PRC-wide
entity.\8\ We have not received any information since then that would
lead us to reconsider our preliminary determination with respect to
these four companies. Therefore, we continue to find that these four
companies should be treated as part of the PRC-wide entity and subject
to the PRC-wide entity rate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ These companies are Dechang Shida Carbon Co., Ltd., Shida
Carbon Group, Sichuan Shida Trading Co., Ltd., and Sichuan Guanghan
Shida Carbon Co., Ltd.
\8\ See Preliminary Results, and accompanying Preliminary
Decision Memorandum at 8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the Preliminary Results, we stated our intent not to rescind the
review for certain companies that remain a part of the PRC-wide entity,
notwithstanding timely withdrawal of review requests for these
companies, because the PRC-wide entity remains under review.\9\ Since
the Preliminary Results, we did not receive any information that would
cause us to revisit our preliminary determination not to rescind the
review with respect to these companies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See id., 78 FR at 14966.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consistent with our practice, we will issue appropriate
instructions to CBP for any entries made by the companies that remain a
part of the PRC-wide entity during the POR.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our analysis of the comments received, we have revised our
calculation of the surrogate financial ratios used in the margin
calculations for mandatory respondents, Fangda Group \10\ and Fushun
Jinly Petrochemical Carbon Co., Ltd. (Fushun Jinly).\11\ This revision
did not change the weighted-average margins we calculated in the
Preliminary Results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ We refer to the Fangda Group as a single entity pursuant to
19 CFR 351.401(f)(1). See Small Diameter Graphite Electrodes From
the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Determination of Sales
at Less Than Fair Value, Postponement of Final Determination, and
Affirmative Preliminary Determination of Critical Circumstances, in
Part, 73 FR 49408, 49411-12 (August 21, 2008) (where we collapsed
the following individual members of the Fangda Group: Beijing Fangda
Carbon Tech Co., Ltd., Chengdu Rongguang Carbon Co., Ltd., Fangda
Carbon New Material Co., Ltd., Fushun Carbon Co., Ltd., and Hefei
Carbon Co., Ltd.), unchanged in Final Determination of Sales at Less
Than Fair Value and Affirmative Determination of Critical
Circumstances: Small Diameter Graphite Electrodes from the People's
Republic of China, 74 FR 2049 (January 14, 2009).
\11\ See accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment
6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of the Review
We determine that the following percentage weighted-average dumping
margins exist for the period February 1, 2011, through January 31,
2012:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Margin
Company (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fushun Jinly Petrochemical Carbon Co., Ltd................. 0.00
Beijing Fangda Carbon Tech Co., Ltd........................ 0.00
Chengdu Rongguang Carbon Co., Ltd.......................... 0.00
Fangda Carbon New Material Co., Ltd........................ 0.00
Fushun Carbon Co., Ltd..................................... 0.00
Hefei Carbon Co., Ltd...................................... 0.00
Xinghe County Muzi Carbon Co., Ltd......................... 0.00
PRC-wide entity *.......................................... 159.64
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* The PRC-Wide entity includes the companies listed in Appendix 2.
Assessment
The Department will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping
duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review pursuant to 19
CFR 351.212(b). We intend to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15
days after the date of publication of the final results of review.
For Fushun Jinly, Muzi Carbon, and the five companies comprising
the Fangda Group we will instruct CBP to liquidate all entries during
the POR without regard to antidumping duties because their weighted-
average
[[Page 55682]]
dumping margins in these final results are zero.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See Antidumping Proceeding: Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8103 (February 14,
2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of these final results of review for all shipments of the
subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication date as provided by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) No cash deposit will be required for
subject merchandise exported by Fushun Jinly, Muzi Carbon, and the five
companies comprising the Fangda Group because they received a rate of
0.00 percent in the final results of this administrative review; (2)
for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters not
listed above that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing
exporter-specific rate; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject
merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate,
the cash deposit rate will be that for the PRC-wide entity; and (4) for
all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received
their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to
the PRC exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit
requirements shall remain in effect until further notice.
Notifications
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable
violation.
Disclosure
We intend to disclose the calculations performed within five days
of the date of publication of this notice to parties in this
proceeding, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
These final results of review are issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act.
Dated: September 4, 2013.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
Appendix 1
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
Comment 1: U.S. Sales Attributable to Circumvention Determination
Comment 2: Tolling Data
Comment 3: Reconciliation of Factors of Production
Comment 4: Differential Pricing and Targeted Dumping Analyses
Comment 5: Rate for Non-Selected Companies
Comment 6: Surrogate Financial Ratios
Appendix 2
Firms for which we are not rescinding the review even though we
received timely withdrawal requests because these companies are part
of the PRC entity as they did not have a separate rate from a prior
segment.
1. 5-Continent Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd.
2. Acclcarbon Co., Ltd.
3. Allied Carbon (China) Co., Limited
4. Anssen Metallurgy Group Co., Ltd.
5. AMGL
6. Apex Maritime (Dalian) Co., Ltd.
7. Asahi Fine Carbon (Dalian) Co., Ltd.
8. Beijing Xinchengze Inc.
9. Beijing Xincheng Sci-Tech. Development Inc.
10. Chang Cheng Chang Electrode Co., Ltd.
11. Chengdelh Carbonaceous Elements Factory
12. Chengdu Jia Tang Corp.
13. China Industrial Mineral & Metals Group
14. China Shaanxi Richbond Imp. & Exp. Industrial Corp. Ltd.
15. China Xingyong Carbon Co., Ltd.
16. CIMM Group Co., Ltd.
17. Dalian Carbon & Graphite Corporation
18. Dalian Hongrui Carbon Co., Ltd.
19. Dalian Honest International Trade Co., Ltd.
20. Dalian Horton International Trading Co., Ltd.
21. Dalian LST Metallurgy Co., Ltd.
22. Dalian Shuangji Co., Ltd.
23. Datong Carbon
24. Datong Carbon Plant
25. Datong Xincheng Carbon Co., Ltd.
26. De Well Container Shipping Corp.
27. Dewell Group
28. Dignity Success Investment Trading Co., Ltd.
29. Double Dragon Metals and Mineral Tools Co., Ltd.
30. Fangda Lanzhou Carbon Joint Stock Company Co. Ltd.
31. Foset Co., Ltd.
32. Fushun Orient Carbon Co., Ltd.
33. Guangdong Highsun Yongye (Group) Co., Ltd.
34. Haimen Shuguang Carbon Industry Co., Ltd.
35. Handan Hanbo Material Co., Ltd.
36. Hebei Long Great Wall Electrode Co., Ltd.
37. Heilongjiang Xinyuan Metacarbon Company, Ltd.
38. Henan Sanli Carbon Products Co., Ltd.
39. Hopes (Beijing) International Co., Ltd.
40. Hunan Mec Machinery and Electronics Imp. & Exp. Corp.
41. Hunan Yinguang Carbon Factory Co., Ltd.
42. Inner Mongolia QingShan Special Graphite and Carbon Co., Ltd.
43. Inner Mongolia Xinghe County Hongyuan Electrical Carbon Factory
44. Jiang Long Carbon
45. Jiangsu Yafei Carbon Co., Ltd.
46. Jichun International Trade Co., Ltd. of Jilin Province
47. Jiexiu Juyuan Carbon Co., Ltd.
48. Jiexiu Ju-Yuan & Coaly Co., Ltd.
49. Jilin Carbon Graphite Material Co., Ltd.
50. Jilin Carbon Import and Export Company
51. Jilin Songjiang Carbon Co Ltd.
52. Jinneng Group Co., Ltd.
53. Jinyu Thermo-Electric Material Co., Ltd.
54. Kaifeng Carbon Company Ltd.
55. KASY Logistics (Tianjin) Co., Ltd.
56. Kimwan New Carbon Technology and Development Co., Ltd.
57. Kingstone Industrial Group Ltd.
58. L & T Group Co., Ltd.
59. Laishui Long Great Wall Electrode Co. Ltd.
60. Lanzhou Carbon Co., Ltd.
61. Lanzhou Carbon Import & Export Corp.
62. Lanzhou Hailong Technology
63. Lanzhou Ruixin Industrial Material Co., Ltd.
64. LH Carbon Factory of Chengde
65. Lianxing Carbon Qinghai Co., Ltd.
66. Lianxing Carbon Science Institute
67. Lianxing Carbon (Shandong) Co., Ltd.
68. Lianyungang Jinli Carbon Co., Ltd.
69. Liaoyang Carbon Co. Ltd.
70. Linyi County Lubei Carbon Co., Ltd.
71. Maoming Yongye (Group) Co., Ltd.
72. MBI Beijing International Trade Co., Ltd.
73. Nantong Yangtze Carbon Corp. Ltd.
74. Orient (Dalian) Carbon Resources Developing Co., Ltd.
75. Orient Star Transport International, Ltd.
76. Peixian Longxiang Foreign Trade Co. Ltd.
77. Qingdao Grand Graphite Products Co., Ltd.
78. Quingdao Haosheng Metals & Minerals Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd.
79. Qingdao Liyikun Carbon Development Co., Ltd.
80. Qingdao Likun Graphite Co., Ltd.
81. Qingdao Ruizhen Carbon Co., Ltd.
82. Ray Group Ltd.
83. Rex International Forwarding Co., Ltd.
84. Rt Carbon Co., Ltd.
85. Ruitong Carbon Co., Ltd.
86. Shandong Basan Carbon Plant
87. Shandong Zibo Continent Carbon Factory
88. Shanghai Carbon International Trade Co., Ltd.
89. Shanghai P.W. International Ltd.
90. Shanghai Shen-Tech Graphite Material
[[Page 55683]]
Co., Ltd.
91. Shanghai Topstate International Trading Co., Ltd.
92. Shanxi Datong Energy Development Co., Ltd.
93. Shanxi Foset Carbon Co. Ltd.
94. Shanxi Jiexiu Import and Export Co., Ltd.
95. Shanxi Jinneng Group Co., Ltd.
96. Shanxi Yunheng Graphite Electrode Co., Ltd.
97. Shijaizhuang Carbon Co., Ltd.
98. Sichuan 5-Continent Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd.
99. Sichuan GMT International Inc.
100. Sinicway International Logistics Ltd.
101. Sinosteel Anhui Co., Ltd.
102. Sinosteel Jilin Carbon Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd.
103. Sinosteel Sichuan Co., Ltd.
104. SMMC Group Co., Ltd.
105. Sure Mega (Hong Kong) Ltd.
106. Tangshan Kimwan Special Carbon & Graphite Co., Ltd.
107. Tengchong Carbon Co., Ltd.
108. Tianjin (Teda) Iron & Steel Trade Co., Ltd.
109. Tianjin Kimwan Carbon Technology and Development Co., Ltd.
110. Tianjin Yue Yang Industrial & Trading Co., Ltd.
111. Tielong (Chengdu) Carbon Co., Ltd.
112. United Carbon Ltd.
113. United Trade Resources, Inc.
114. Weifang Lianxing Carbon Co., Ltd.
115. World Trade Metals & Minerals Co., Ltd.
116. XC Carbon Group
117. Xinyuan Carbon Co., Ltd.
118. Xuanhua Hongli Refractory and Mineral Company
119. Xuchang Minmetals & Industry Co., Ltd.
120. Xuzhou Carbon Co., Ltd.
121. Xuzhou Electrode Factory
122. Yangzhou Qionghua Carbon Trading Ltd.
123. Yixing Huaxin Imp & Exp Co. Ltd.
124. Youth Industry Co., Ltd.
125. Zhengzhou Jinyu Thermo-Electric Material Co., Ltd.
126. Zibo Continent Carbon Factory
127. Zibo DuoCheng Trading Co., Ltd.
128. Zibo Lianxing Carbon Co., Ltd.
129. Zibo Wuzhou Tanshun Carbon Co., Ltd.
Companies that are now part of the PRC entity because they did
not demonstrate in this review that they are entitled to a separate
rate.
1. Dechang Shida Carbon Co., Ltd.
2. Shida Carbon Group
3. Sichuan Shida Trading Co., Ltd.
4. Sichuan Guanghan Shida Carbon Co., Ltd.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ This company is the same entity as Guanghan Shida Carbon
Co., Ltd., for which this administrative review was initiated. See
Small Diameter Graphite Electrodes from the People's Republic of
China: Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,
77 FR 40854, 40856 (July 11, 2012).
[FR Doc. 2013-22028 Filed 9-10-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
