Self-Regulatory Organizations; Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.; Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend FINRA Rule 5131 (New Issue Allocations and Distributions), 55322-55325 [2013-21930]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
55322
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 10, 2013 / Notices
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission will institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–NASDAQ–2013–111 on the
subject line.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NASDAQ–2013–111. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
offices of NASDAQ. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:10 Sep 09, 2013
Jkt 229001
NASDAQ–2013–111, and should be
submitted on or before October 1, 2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.8
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–21936 Filed 9–9–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
[Release No. 34–70312; File No. SR–FINRA–
2013–037]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc.; Notice of Filing of a
Proposed Rule Change To Amend
FINRA Rule 5131 (New Issue
Allocations and Distributions)
September 4, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on August
23, 2013, Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc. (‘‘FINRA’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed
rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been
prepared by FINRA. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
FINRA is proposing to amend FINRA
Rule 5131 (New Issue Allocations and
Distributions) to provide a limited
exception to allow members to rely on
written representations from certain
accounts to comply with Rule 5131(b).
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on FINRA’s Web site at
https://www.finra.org, at the principal
office of FINRA and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission,
FINRA included statements concerning
the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
8 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
PO 00000
in Item IV below. FINRA has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.
Sfmt 4703
FINRA Rule 5131 (New Issue
Allocations and Distributions) (the
‘‘Rule’’) addresses abuses in the
allocation and distribution of ‘‘new
issues.’’ 3 Rule 5131(b) prohibits the
practice of spinning, which refers to an
underwriter’s allocation of new issue
shares to executive officers and
directors of a company as an
inducement to award the underwriter
with investment banking business, or as
consideration for investment banking
business previously awarded (the
‘‘spinning’’ provision).
Specifically, the spinning provision
provides that no member or person
associated with a member may allocate
shares of a new issue to any account in
which an executive officer or director of
a public company 4 or a covered nonpublic company,5 or a person materially
supported 6 by such executive officer or
director, has a beneficial interest: 7
• If the company is currently an
investment banking services 8 client of
the member or the member has received
compensation from the company for
3 Rule 5131 provides that ‘‘new issue’’ shall have
the same meaning as in Rule 5130(i)(9).
4 A ‘‘public company’’ is any company that is
registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act or
files periodic reports pursuant to Section 15(d)
thereof. See Rule 5131(e)(1).
5 The Rule defines a ‘‘covered non-public
company’’ as any non-public company satisfying
the following criteria: (i) Income of at least $1
million in the last fiscal year or in two of the last
three fiscal years and shareholders’ equity of at least
$15 million; (ii) shareholders’ equity of at least $30
million and a two-year operating history; or (iii)
total assets and total revenue of at least $75 million
in the latest fiscal year or in two of the last three
fiscal years. See Rule 5131(e)(3).
6 ‘‘Material support’’ means directly or indirectly
providing more than 25% of a person’s income in
the prior calendar year. Persons living in the same
household are deemed to be providing each other
with material support. See Rule 5131(e)(6).
7 The Rule provides that the term ‘‘beneficial
interest’’ shall have the same meaning as in Rule
5130(i)(1).
8 ‘‘Investment banking services’’ include, without
limitation, acting as an underwriter, participating in
a selling group in an offering for the issuer or
otherwise acting in furtherance of a public offering
of the issuer; acting as a financial adviser in a
merger, acquisition or other corporate
reorganization; providing venture capital, equity
lines of credit, private investment, public equity
transactions (PIPEs) or similar investments or
otherwise acting in furtherance of a private offering
of the issuer; or serving as placement agent for the
issuer. See Rule 5131(e)(5).
E:\FR\FM\10SEN1.SGM
10SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 10, 2013 / Notices
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
investment banking services in the past
12 months;
• If the person responsible for making
the allocation decision knows or has
reason to know that the member intends
to provide, or expects to be retained by
the company for, investment banking
services within the next three months;
or
• On the express or implied condition
that such executive officer or director,
on behalf of the company, will retain
the member for the performance of
future investment banking services.
Rule 5131.02 (Annual Representation)
provides that, for the purposes of the
spinning provision, a member may rely
on a written representation obtained
within the prior 12 months from the
beneficial owner(s) of an account, or a
person authorized to represent the
beneficial owner(s), as to whether such
beneficial owner(s) is an executive
officer or director or person materially
supported by an executive officer or
director and if so, the company on
whose behalf such executive officer or
director serves. Therefore, to comply
with the spinning provision, firms
typically issue questionnaires to their
customers to ascertain whether any of
the persons covered by the spinning
provision have a beneficial interest in
the account.9
Rule 5131(b)(2) provides a de minimis
exception for new issue allocations to
any account in which the beneficial
interests of executive officers and
directors of a company subject to the
rule, and persons materially supported
by such executive officers and directors,
do not exceed in the aggregate 25% of
such account. FINRA understands that
members (and their customers) have had
difficulty obtaining, tracking and
aggregating information from funds
regarding indirect beneficial owners,
such as participants in a fund of funds,
for use in determining an account’s
eligibility for the de minimis exception
and that this has resulted in compliance
difficulties and restrictions, including in
situations where the ability of an
underwriter to confer any meaningful
financial benefit to a particular investor
by allocating new issue shares to the
account is impracticable.10
9 The spinning provision currently addresses
operational burdens associated with some accounts
with a large and diverse ownership base where the
potential for spinning is minimal through a series
of exemptions for purchasers such as mutual funds,
insurance company general accounts and various
employee benefit plans. See generally Rule 5130(c).
Private funds, however, are not a category of
purchasers for which a general exemption exists.
10 For example, members have noted that brokerdealers normally do not know the identity of the
beneficial owners of the fund of funds invested in
the account.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:10 Sep 09, 2013
Jkt 229001
FINRA believes that certain funds,
owing to several mitigating factors
including their size, lack of affiliation
with the account directly receiving the
allocation and layered (and often
opaque) ownership structure, generally
do not raise the concerns that the Rule
is designed to address. Moreover, where
the potential profits from a new issue
allocation are spread across a large and
diverse investor base, it is unlikely that
the proportional benefit to any
particular indirect investor would be of
an amount that would further spinning
(i.e., indirect fund ownership can be an
impractical and ineffective means to
receive any benefit from spinning).
Therefore, FINRA is proposing a limited
exception to the spinning provision in
the fund of funds context that includes
a set of conditions designed to ensure
that the important protections of the
Rule continue to be preserved, while
offering meaningful relief for members
and investors in situations where
spinning abuse is not likely.
Specifically, FINRA is proposing to
provide that members may rely upon a
written representation obtained within
the prior 12 months from a person
authorized to represent an account that
does not look through to the indirect
beneficial owners of a fund invested in
the account, that such fund:
• Is a ‘‘private fund’’ as defined in the
Investment Advisers Act of 1940; 11
• Is managed by an investment
adviser;
• Has assets greater than $50 million;
• Owns less than 25% of the account
and is not a fund in which a single
investor has a beneficial interest of 25%
or more;
• Does not have a beneficial owner
that also is a control person of such
fund’s investment adviser;
• Is ‘‘unaffiliated’’ with the account
in that the private fund’s investment
adviser does not have a control person
in common with the account’s
investment adviser;12 and
• Was not formed for the specific
purpose of investing in the account.
FINRA believes that these conditions
are reasonable to assure that a member’s
new issue allocation will not be in
furtherance of spinning, while reducing
the compliance burdens associated with
the Rule. In addition, a member may
11 Section 202(a)(29) of the Investment Advisers
Act of 1940 defines the term ‘‘private fund’’ as an
issuer that would be an investment company, as
defined in Section 3 of the Investment Company
Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a–3) (‘‘Investment
Company Act’’), but for Section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of
the Investment Company Act.
12 A control person of an investment adviser is a
person with direct or indirect ‘‘control’’ over the
investment adviser; as that term is defined in Form
ADV.
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
55323
rely upon a written representation by an
account as to the availability of this
proposed exception unless it believes,
or has reason to believe, that such
representation is inaccurate. Members
availing themselves of the new
supplementary material must maintain a
copy of all records and information
relating to whether an account is
eligible to receive an allocation of the
new issue under the spinning provision
in its files for at least three years
following the member’s allocation to
that account.
FINRA discussed with FINRA
committees, industry groups and
member firms the logistical
impracticalities, costs and other hurdles
involved in attempting to track
beneficial ownership. The comments are
described in detail in Item 5 (sic) below.
The proposal takes those discussions
into account.
FINRA has considered various
alternatives to the current approach,
including proposing an exception for all
private funds meeting certain asset
thresholds, providing an interpretation
to the existing de minimis exception, or
requiring alternative percentage caps for
direct and indirect beneficial ownership
in the account. In considering these and
other alternatives, FINRA sought to
balance preserving the protections the
Rule was designed to provide with
limiting the scope of the rule to
situations that might reasonably result
in the harms sought to be addressed.
FINRA also sought to avoid increasing
complexity in the Rule, with added
compliance costs, where the concerns to
be avoided were remote.
As a result, FINRA determined that a
wholesale exception for private funds
was not appropriate.13 In addition,
because a fund indirectly invested in
the account could consist of a single
investor—potentially including covered
persons—FINRA believes that a limit to
both direct and indirect beneficial
ownership is important in preserving
the efficacy of the spinning provision.
The proposed rule change is intended to
balance the compliance concerns and
burdens noted by the industry with
FINRA’s goal of assuring that the Rule
continues to be designed to promote
investor confidence and prevent
fraudulent and manipulative behaviors.
FINRA will announce the effective
date of the proposed rule change in a
Regulatory Notice to be published no
later than 60 days following
Commission approval. The effective
date will be no later than 120 days
following Commission approval.
13 See
E:\FR\FM\10SEN1.SGM
supra note 9.
10SEN1
55324
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 10, 2013 / Notices
2. Statutory Basis
FINRA believes that the proposed rule
change is consistent with the provisions
of Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act,14 which
requires, among other things, that
FINRA rules must be designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest. FINRA believes that the
proposed exception and required
conditions will further these purposes
by promoting capital formation and
aiding member compliance efforts,
while maintaining investor confidence
in the capital markets.
Specifically, the proposed condition
that the fund be managed by an
investment adviser that is unaffiliated
with the account’s investment adviser
seeks to ensure the structural
independence of the funds’ respective
advisers. This requirement, in addition
to the proviso that the unaffiliated
private fund must not have been formed
for the specific purpose of investing in
the account, seeks to mitigate the
possibility of collusive conduct aimed at
furthering spinning.
In addition, the condition providing
that the unaffiliated private fund may
not have any beneficial owners who also
are control persons of such fund’s
investment adviser seeks to eliminate
the conflict that may exist where an
adviser also is an investor in the fund
and, therefore, may directly benefit from
allocation decisions. The requirements
regarding the minimum size of the
private fund (over $50 million) and the
percentage ownership thresholds
(private fund must own less than 25%
of the account and not be a fund in
which a single investor has a beneficial
interest of 25% or more) seek to ensure
that the proportional benefit of any new
issue allocation to a single indirect
beneficial owner would be insufficient
to further spinning.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
FINRA does not believe that the
proposed rule change will result in any
burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act in that the
proposed rule provides an exception to
Rule 5131(b) for funds of funds that face
special difficulties under the existing
exemptions from the Rule, and thus the
proposed exemption tries to reduce
differential impacts of the Rule. FINRA
also believes that it is reasonable to
permit members to rely on written
14 15
U.S.C. 78o–3(b)(6).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:10 Sep 09, 2013
Jkt 229001
representations from the account
regarding compliance with the
conditions of the exception as a means
of achieving compliance with the
purposes of the Rule without imposing
layered tracking and other requirements
on members that could be costly and
unduly hamper the accounts’ access to
new issue shares.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
FINRA received four letters regarding
the issues addressed by the proposed
rule change from three commenters,15
and engaged in additional discussions
with industry groups and market
participants regarding the operation of
the spinning provision, the operation of
the existing de minimis exception and
members’ difficulty in identifying
indirect beneficial owners of an
account. A list of the commenters is
attached as Exhibit 2a. Copies of the
comment letters received are attached as
Exhibit 2b.
Commenters sought either
interpretive guidance regarding the
existing de minimis exception to
increase its scope or a new amendment
to address difficulties in allocating to
investment funds, particularly in the
fund of funds context. Commenters
argued that investment funds are not an
effective tool for a broker-dealer to
convey a meaningful benefit to a
particular covered person.16 One
commenter stated that the funds of
funds it offers have investments in
anywhere from 25 to 70 unaffiliated
portfolio funds.17 The commenter
further noted that investors in a fund of
funds, including any potential covered
persons, cannot direct which broker a
portfolio fund uses or will use, and may
not know in which portfolio funds the
fund of funds is invested.18
15 See Letters from Gregory J. Robbins, Senior
Managing Director and General Counsel, Mesirow
Advanced Strategies, Inc., to Gary L. Goldsholle,
Vice President and Associate General Counsel,
Office of the General Counsel, FINRA, dated June
10, 2011 (‘‘Mesirow’’); Andrew Baker, Chief
Executive Officer, Alternative Investment
Management Association, to Richard G. Ketchum,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, FINRA,
dated August 3, 2011 (‘‘AIMA’’); Stuart J. Kaswell,
Executive Vice President and Managing Director
and General Counsel, Managed Funds Association,
to Marc Menchel, Executive Vice President and
General Counsel, FINRA, dated August 19, 2011
(‘‘MFA #1’’); and Stuart J. Kaswell, Executive Vice
President and Managing Director and General
Counsel, Managed Funds Association, to Marc
Menchel, Executive Vice President and General
Counsel, FINRA, dated October 4, 2011 (‘‘MFA
#2’’).
16 See AIMA, Mesirow, MFA #1 and MFA #2.
17 See Mesirow.
18 See Mesirow.
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Commenters also discussed the
logistical impracticalities and other
hurdles involved in attempting to track
beneficial ownership.19 A commenter
stated that, as currently structured, the
spinning provisions potentially would
require significant amounts of time and
money to implement.20 In addition,
another commenter generally stated that
funds of funds may (and often do) have
several hundred investors, each of
which themselves may have hundreds
of beneficial owners; thus, the
operational hurdles and cost of
obtaining the relevant representations
from all of the ultimate beneficial
owners would be substantial.21 The
commenter further stated that obtaining
beneficial ownership information is not
always possible due to confidentiality
and investor privacy concerns.22
FINRA has carefully considered the
comments received and has considered
the various alternatives suggested in
crafting the current proposal and
believes that the proposed rule change
strikes the appropriate balance by
simplifying the operation of the Rule
while maintaining the protections the
spinning provision is designed to
provide, as discussed above.23
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period (i)
as the Commission may designate up to
90 days of such date if it finds such
longer period to be appropriate and
publishes its reasons for so finding or
(ii) as to which the self-regulatory
organization consents, the Commission
will:
(A) by order approve or disapprove
such proposed rule change, or
(B) institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
19 See
e.g., AIMA, MFA #1 and MFA #2.
AIMA.
21 See MFA #2.
22 See MFA #1.
23 One commenter suggested, among other things,
that the existing 25% de minimis exception be
interpreted to apply separately to each public
company or covered non-public company.
However, the rule clearly states that the calculation
is to be applied in the aggregate for all covered
companies and the proposal would not change that
requirement. See AIMA.
20 See
E:\FR\FM\10SEN1.SGM
10SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 10, 2013 / Notices
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
FINRA–2013–037 on the subject line.
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–FINRA–2013–037. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing
also will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of
FINRA. All comments received will be
posted without change; the Commission
does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–FINRA–2013–037 and
should be submitted on or before
October 1, 2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.24
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–21930 Filed 9–9–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:10 Sep 09, 2013
[Public Notice 8458]
30-Day Notice of Proposed Information
Collection: U.S. Passport Renewal
Application for Eligible Individuals
Notice of request for public
comment and submission to OMB of
proposed collection of information.
ACTION:
The Department of State has
submitted the information collection
described below to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
approval. In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, we
are requesting comments on this
collection from all interested
individuals and organizations. The
purpose of this notice is to allow 30
days for public comment.
DATES: Submit comments directly to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) up to October 10, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Direct comments to the
Department of State Desk Officer in the
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs at the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB). You may submit
comments by the following methods:
• Email: oira_submission@
omb.eop.gov. You must include the DS
form number, information collection
title, and the OMB control number in
the subject line of your message.
• Fax: (202) 395–5806. Attention:
Desk Officer for Department of State.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Direct requests for additional
information regarding the collection
listed in this notice, including requests
for copies of the proposed collection
instrument and supporting documents,
to U.S. Department of State, Bureau of
Consular Affairs, Passport Services,
Office of Program Management and
Operational Support, 2201 C Street
NW., Washington, DC 20520, who may
be reached on (202) 485–6510 or at
PPTFormsOfficer@state.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
• Title of Information Collection: U.S.
Passport Renewal Application For
Eligible Individuals
• OMB Control Number: 1405–0020
• Type of Request: Revision of a
Currently Approved Collection
• Originating Office: Bureau of Consular
Affairs, Passport Services, Office of
Program Management and
Operational Support, Program
Coordination Division (CA/PPT/S/
PMO/PC)
• Form Number: DS–82
• Respondents: Individuals or
Households
• Estimated Number of Respondents:
4,215,761
SUMMARY:
Paper Comments
24 17
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
55325
• Estimated Number of Responses:
4,215,761
• Average Time Per Response: 40
minutes per response
• Total Estimated Burden Time:
2,810,507 hours per year
• Frequency: On occasion
• Obligation to Respond: Required to
Obtain or Retain a Benefit
We are soliciting public comments to
permit the Department to:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
information collection is necessary for
the proper functions of the Department.
• Evaluate the accuracy of our
estimate of the time and cost burden for
this proposed collection, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used.
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected.
• Minimize the reporting burden on
those who are to respond, including the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Please note that comments submitted
in response to this Notice are public
record. Before including any detailed
personal information, you should be
aware that your comments as submitted,
including your personal information,
will be available for public review.
Abstract of proposed collection: The
information collected on the DS–82 is
used to facilitate the issuance of
passports to U.S. citizens and nationals.
The primary purpose of soliciting the
information is to establish citizenship,
identity, and entitlement to the issuance
of the U.S. passport or related service,
and to properly administer and enforce
the laws pertaining to the issuance
thereof.
The DS–82 solicits data necessary for
Passport Services to issue a United
States passport (book and/or card
format) in the exercise of authorities
granted to the Secretary of State in 22
United States Code (U.S.C.) Section
211a et seq. and Executive Order (EO)
11295 (August 5, 1966) for the issuance
of passports to U.S. nationals.
The issuance of U.S. passports
requires the determination of identity,
nationality, and entitlement, with
reference to the provisions of Title III of
the Immigration and Nationality Act
(INA) (8 U.S.C. sections 1401–1504), the
14th Amendment to the Constitution of
the United States, other applicable
treaties and laws and implementing
regulations at 22 CFR Part 50 and 51.
The specific regulations pertaining to
the Application for a U.S. Passport by
Mail are at 22 CFR 51.20 and 51.21.
Methodology: Passport Services
collects information from U.S. citizens
E:\FR\FM\10SEN1.SGM
10SEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 10, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55322-55325]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-21930]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-70312; File No. SR-FINRA-2013-037]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc.; Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend
FINRA Rule 5131 (New Issue Allocations and Distributions)
September 4, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on August 23, 2013, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
(``FINRA'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC''
or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I,
II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by FINRA. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
FINRA is proposing to amend FINRA Rule 5131 (New Issue Allocations
and Distributions) to provide a limited exception to allow members to
rely on written representations from certain accounts to comply with
Rule 5131(b).
The text of the proposed rule change is available on FINRA's Web
site at https://www.finra.org, at the principal office of FINRA and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, FINRA included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. FINRA has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A,
B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
FINRA Rule 5131 (New Issue Allocations and Distributions) (the
``Rule'') addresses abuses in the allocation and distribution of ``new
issues.'' \3\ Rule 5131(b) prohibits the practice of spinning, which
refers to an underwriter's allocation of new issue shares to executive
officers and directors of a company as an inducement to award the
underwriter with investment banking business, or as consideration for
investment banking business previously awarded (the ``spinning''
provision).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Rule 5131 provides that ``new issue'' shall have the same
meaning as in Rule 5130(i)(9).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Specifically, the spinning provision provides that no member or
person associated with a member may allocate shares of a new issue to
any account in which an executive officer or director of a public
company \4\ or a covered non-public company,\5\ or a person materially
supported \6\ by such executive officer or director, has a beneficial
interest: \7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ A ``public company'' is any company that is registered under
Section 12 of the Exchange Act or files periodic reports pursuant to
Section 15(d) thereof. See Rule 5131(e)(1).
\5\ The Rule defines a ``covered non-public company'' as any
non-public company satisfying the following criteria: (i) Income of
at least $1 million in the last fiscal year or in two of the last
three fiscal years and shareholders' equity of at least $15 million;
(ii) shareholders' equity of at least $30 million and a two-year
operating history; or (iii) total assets and total revenue of at
least $75 million in the latest fiscal year or in two of the last
three fiscal years. See Rule 5131(e)(3).
\6\ ``Material support'' means directly or indirectly providing
more than 25% of a person's income in the prior calendar year.
Persons living in the same household are deemed to be providing each
other with material support. See Rule 5131(e)(6).
\7\ The Rule provides that the term ``beneficial interest''
shall have the same meaning as in Rule 5130(i)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
If the company is currently an investment banking services
\8\ client of the member or the member has received compensation from
the company for
[[Page 55323]]
investment banking services in the past 12 months;
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ ``Investment banking services'' include, without limitation,
acting as an underwriter, participating in a selling group in an
offering for the issuer or otherwise acting in furtherance of a
public offering of the issuer; acting as a financial adviser in a
merger, acquisition or other corporate reorganization; providing
venture capital, equity lines of credit, private investment, public
equity transactions (PIPEs) or similar investments or otherwise
acting in furtherance of a private offering of the issuer; or
serving as placement agent for the issuer. See Rule 5131(e)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
If the person responsible for making the allocation
decision knows or has reason to know that the member intends to
provide, or expects to be retained by the company for, investment
banking services within the next three months; or
On the express or implied condition that such executive
officer or director, on behalf of the company, will retain the member
for the performance of future investment banking services.
Rule 5131.02 (Annual Representation) provides that, for the
purposes of the spinning provision, a member may rely on a written
representation obtained within the prior 12 months from the beneficial
owner(s) of an account, or a person authorized to represent the
beneficial owner(s), as to whether such beneficial owner(s) is an
executive officer or director or person materially supported by an
executive officer or director and if so, the company on whose behalf
such executive officer or director serves. Therefore, to comply with
the spinning provision, firms typically issue questionnaires to their
customers to ascertain whether any of the persons covered by the
spinning provision have a beneficial interest in the account.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ The spinning provision currently addresses operational
burdens associated with some accounts with a large and diverse
ownership base where the potential for spinning is minimal through a
series of exemptions for purchasers such as mutual funds, insurance
company general accounts and various employee benefit plans. See
generally Rule 5130(c). Private funds, however, are not a category
of purchasers for which a general exemption exists.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule 5131(b)(2) provides a de minimis exception for new issue
allocations to any account in which the beneficial interests of
executive officers and directors of a company subject to the rule, and
persons materially supported by such executive officers and directors,
do not exceed in the aggregate 25% of such account. FINRA understands
that members (and their customers) have had difficulty obtaining,
tracking and aggregating information from funds regarding indirect
beneficial owners, such as participants in a fund of funds, for use in
determining an account's eligibility for the de minimis exception and
that this has resulted in compliance difficulties and restrictions,
including in situations where the ability of an underwriter to confer
any meaningful financial benefit to a particular investor by allocating
new issue shares to the account is impracticable.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ For example, members have noted that broker-dealers
normally do not know the identity of the beneficial owners of the
fund of funds invested in the account.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINRA believes that certain funds, owing to several mitigating
factors including their size, lack of affiliation with the account
directly receiving the allocation and layered (and often opaque)
ownership structure, generally do not raise the concerns that the Rule
is designed to address. Moreover, where the potential profits from a
new issue allocation are spread across a large and diverse investor
base, it is unlikely that the proportional benefit to any particular
indirect investor would be of an amount that would further spinning
(i.e., indirect fund ownership can be an impractical and ineffective
means to receive any benefit from spinning). Therefore, FINRA is
proposing a limited exception to the spinning provision in the fund of
funds context that includes a set of conditions designed to ensure that
the important protections of the Rule continue to be preserved, while
offering meaningful relief for members and investors in situations
where spinning abuse is not likely.
Specifically, FINRA is proposing to provide that members may rely
upon a written representation obtained within the prior 12 months from
a person authorized to represent an account that does not look through
to the indirect beneficial owners of a fund invested in the account,
that such fund:
Is a ``private fund'' as defined in the Investment
Advisers Act of 1940; \11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ Section 202(a)(29) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940
defines the term ``private fund'' as an issuer that would be an
investment company, as defined in Section 3 of the Investment
Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-3) (``Investment Company Act''),
but for Section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is managed by an investment adviser;
Has assets greater than $50 million;
Owns less than 25% of the account and is not a fund in
which a single investor has a beneficial interest of 25% or more;
Does not have a beneficial owner that also is a control
person of such fund's investment adviser;
Is ``unaffiliated'' with the account in that the private
fund's investment adviser does not have a control person in common with
the account's investment adviser;\12\ and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ A control person of an investment adviser is a person with
direct or indirect ``control'' over the investment adviser; as that
term is defined in Form ADV.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Was not formed for the specific purpose of investing in
the account.
FINRA believes that these conditions are reasonable to assure that
a member's new issue allocation will not be in furtherance of spinning,
while reducing the compliance burdens associated with the Rule. In
addition, a member may rely upon a written representation by an account
as to the availability of this proposed exception unless it believes,
or has reason to believe, that such representation is inaccurate.
Members availing themselves of the new supplementary material must
maintain a copy of all records and information relating to whether an
account is eligible to receive an allocation of the new issue under the
spinning provision in its files for at least three years following the
member's allocation to that account.
FINRA discussed with FINRA committees, industry groups and member
firms the logistical impracticalities, costs and other hurdles involved
in attempting to track beneficial ownership. The comments are described
in detail in Item 5 (sic) below. The proposal takes those discussions
into account.
FINRA has considered various alternatives to the current approach,
including proposing an exception for all private funds meeting certain
asset thresholds, providing an interpretation to the existing de
minimis exception, or requiring alternative percentage caps for direct
and indirect beneficial ownership in the account. In considering these
and other alternatives, FINRA sought to balance preserving the
protections the Rule was designed to provide with limiting the scope of
the rule to situations that might reasonably result in the harms sought
to be addressed. FINRA also sought to avoid increasing complexity in
the Rule, with added compliance costs, where the concerns to be avoided
were remote.
As a result, FINRA determined that a wholesale exception for
private funds was not appropriate.\13\ In addition, because a fund
indirectly invested in the account could consist of a single investor--
potentially including covered persons--FINRA believes that a limit to
both direct and indirect beneficial ownership is important in
preserving the efficacy of the spinning provision. The proposed rule
change is intended to balance the compliance concerns and burdens noted
by the industry with FINRA's goal of assuring that the Rule continues
to be designed to promote investor confidence and prevent fraudulent
and manipulative behaviors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See supra note 9.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINRA will announce the effective date of the proposed rule change
in a Regulatory Notice to be published no later than 60 days following
Commission approval. The effective date will be no later than 120 days
following Commission approval.
[[Page 55324]]
2. Statutory Basis
FINRA believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the
provisions of Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act,\14\ which requires, among
other things, that FINRA rules must be designed to prevent fraudulent
and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, and, in general, to protect investors and the
public interest. FINRA believes that the proposed exception and
required conditions will further these purposes by promoting capital
formation and aiding member compliance efforts, while maintaining
investor confidence in the capital markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Specifically, the proposed condition that the fund be managed by an
investment adviser that is unaffiliated with the account's investment
adviser seeks to ensure the structural independence of the funds'
respective advisers. This requirement, in addition to the proviso that
the unaffiliated private fund must not have been formed for the
specific purpose of investing in the account, seeks to mitigate the
possibility of collusive conduct aimed at furthering spinning.
In addition, the condition providing that the unaffiliated private
fund may not have any beneficial owners who also are control persons of
such fund's investment adviser seeks to eliminate the conflict that may
exist where an adviser also is an investor in the fund and, therefore,
may directly benefit from allocation decisions. The requirements
regarding the minimum size of the private fund (over $50 million) and
the percentage ownership thresholds (private fund must own less than
25% of the account and not be a fund in which a single investor has a
beneficial interest of 25% or more) seek to ensure that the
proportional benefit of any new issue allocation to a single indirect
beneficial owner would be insufficient to further spinning.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
FINRA does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in
any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act in that the proposed rule
provides an exception to Rule 5131(b) for funds of funds that face
special difficulties under the existing exemptions from the Rule, and
thus the proposed exemption tries to reduce differential impacts of the
Rule. FINRA also believes that it is reasonable to permit members to
rely on written representations from the account regarding compliance
with the conditions of the exception as a means of achieving compliance
with the purposes of the Rule without imposing layered tracking and
other requirements on members that could be costly and unduly hamper
the accounts' access to new issue shares.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
FINRA received four letters regarding the issues addressed by the
proposed rule change from three commenters,\15\ and engaged in
additional discussions with industry groups and market participants
regarding the operation of the spinning provision, the operation of the
existing de minimis exception and members' difficulty in identifying
indirect beneficial owners of an account. A list of the commenters is
attached as Exhibit 2a. Copies of the comment letters received are
attached as Exhibit 2b.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See Letters from Gregory J. Robbins, Senior Managing
Director and General Counsel, Mesirow Advanced Strategies, Inc., to
Gary L. Goldsholle, Vice President and Associate General Counsel,
Office of the General Counsel, FINRA, dated June 10, 2011
(``Mesirow''); Andrew Baker, Chief Executive Officer, Alternative
Investment Management Association, to Richard G. Ketchum, Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer, FINRA, dated August 3, 2011 (``AIMA'');
Stuart J. Kaswell, Executive Vice President and Managing Director
and General Counsel, Managed Funds Association, to Marc Menchel,
Executive Vice President and General Counsel, FINRA, dated August
19, 2011 (``MFA 1''); and Stuart J. Kaswell, Executive Vice
President and Managing Director and General Counsel, Managed Funds
Association, to Marc Menchel, Executive Vice President and General
Counsel, FINRA, dated October 4, 2011 (``MFA 2'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commenters sought either interpretive guidance regarding the
existing de minimis exception to increase its scope or a new amendment
to address difficulties in allocating to investment funds, particularly
in the fund of funds context. Commenters argued that investment funds
are not an effective tool for a broker-dealer to convey a meaningful
benefit to a particular covered person.\16\ One commenter stated that
the funds of funds it offers have investments in anywhere from 25 to 70
unaffiliated portfolio funds.\17\ The commenter further noted that
investors in a fund of funds, including any potential covered persons,
cannot direct which broker a portfolio fund uses or will use, and may
not know in which portfolio funds the fund of funds is invested.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See AIMA, Mesirow, MFA 1 and MFA 2.
\17\ See Mesirow.
\18\ See Mesirow.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commenters also discussed the logistical impracticalities and other
hurdles involved in attempting to track beneficial ownership.\19\ A
commenter stated that, as currently structured, the spinning provisions
potentially would require significant amounts of time and money to
implement.\20\ In addition, another commenter generally stated that
funds of funds may (and often do) have several hundred investors, each
of which themselves may have hundreds of beneficial owners; thus, the
operational hurdles and cost of obtaining the relevant representations
from all of the ultimate beneficial owners would be substantial.\21\
The commenter further stated that obtaining beneficial ownership
information is not always possible due to confidentiality and investor
privacy concerns.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ See e.g., AIMA, MFA 1 and MFA 2.
\20\ See AIMA.
\21\ See MFA 2.
\22\ See MFA 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINRA has carefully considered the comments received and has
considered the various alternatives suggested in crafting the current
proposal and believes that the proposed rule change strikes the
appropriate balance by simplifying the operation of the Rule while
maintaining the protections the spinning provision is designed to
provide, as discussed above.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ One commenter suggested, among other things, that the
existing 25% de minimis exception be interpreted to apply separately
to each public company or covered non-public company. However, the
rule clearly states that the calculation is to be applied in the
aggregate for all covered companies and the proposal would not
change that requirement. See AIMA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
(A) by order approve or disapprove such proposed rule change, or
(B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
[[Page 55325]]
Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-FINRA-2013-037 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-FINRA-2013-037. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of FINRA. All comments
received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit
personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-FINRA-2013-037 and should be
submitted on or before October 1, 2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-21930 Filed 9-9-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
