Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change to Amend Phlx Rule 910 and Related Phlx Rules, 54346-54349 [2013-21298]
Download as PDF
54346
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 170 / Tuesday, September 3, 2013 / Notices
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–Phlx–
2013–88 and should be submitted on or
before September 24, 2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.32
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–21299 Filed 8–30–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–70270; File No. SR–Phlx–
2013–84]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change to Amend Phlx
Rule 910 and Related Phlx Rules
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
August 27, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on August
14, 2013, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC
(‘‘Phlx’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) a proposed rule change
as described in Items I, II, and III below,
which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
32 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:57 Aug 30, 2013
Jkt 229001
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
Phlx Rule 910 (Qualification as Member
Organization) and related Phlx rules.
The text of the proposed rule change is
below. Proposed additions are in italics
and proposed deletions are in brackets.
Rule 900.2. Membership Applications
(a)–(c) No change.
(d) [If the Membership Department
does not approve a membership
application or permit application, the
department will notify the applicant in
writing of the specific grounds for
denial and the applicant shall have a
right to a hearing. Any appeal from a
decision of the Membership Department
shall be heard by a special committee of
the Board of Directors composed of
three (3) Directors, of whom at least one
(1) shall be a Public Director. The
person requesting review may appeal by
filing a written notice thereof with the
Secretary of the Exchange within ten
(10) days after a decision. The person
requesting review shall be permitted to
submit a written statement to this
special committee. The Secretary of the
Exchange shall certify the record of the
proceeding, if any and the written
decision and shall submit these
documents to the special committee.
The special committee’s review of the
action shall be based solely on the
record, the written decision and any
statement submitted by the person
requesting the review. The special
committee shall prepare and deliver to
such person a written decision and
reasons therefor. If the special
committee affirms the action, the action
shall become effective ten (10) days
from the date of the special committee’s
decision. There shall be no appeal to the
Board of Directors from any decision of
the special committee.
(e)] Absent a showing of good cause,
an application filed pursuant to this
Rule shall lapse after a 90 calendar day
period if an applicant fails to provide
the requisite documentation provided
for in this Rule or any subsequent
written request for information or
documents pursuant to this Rule within
such time period agreed to by the
Membership Department. If such time
period elapses, an applicant seeking
membership to the Exchange shall be
required to file a new application
pursuant to this Rule. The applicant
will be required to pay an additional
application fee at that time. The
Exchange will not refund any fees for
lapsed applications.
PO 00000
Frm 00115
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[(f)] (e) The provisions of this Rule
900.2 shall not apply to a corporation
pursuant to Rule 798.
*
*
*
*
*
Rule 910. Qualification as Member
Organization
(a)–(e) No change.
(f)(1) To obtain and maintain the
status of a member organization, an
organization shall: (i) Be a broker or
dealer duly registered under the
Exchange Act; (ii) be duly qualified by
a permit holder who is primarily
affiliated with such organization for
purposes of nominating as provided in
the By-Laws; (iii) have submitted to the
Membership Department an application
for such status in the form approved by
the Membership Department and any
other information and materials
requested by the Membership
Department; (iv) have had such
application approved by the
Membership Department; and (v) meet
such other requirements as are set forth
in these By-Laws or the Rules of the
Exchange.
(2) To obtain and maintain the status
of a Market Maker on PSX, a member
organization whose market making has
not previously been approved by FINRA
under the NASD Rule 1000 Series (or
such successor FINRA Rules as may be
adopted by FINRA), NASDAQ under the
NASDAQ Rule 1000 Series, or NASDAQ
OMX BX under the BX Rule 1000 Series
shall: (i) Have submitted to the
Membership Department an application
for such status in the form approved by
the Membership Department and any
other information and material
requested by the Membership
Department; (ii) have had such
application approved by the
Membership Department; and (iii) meet
such other requirements as are set forth
in the By-Laws or Rules of the Exchange.
The information to be provided shall
include a business plan, an
organizational chart, written
supervisory procedures reflecting the
change, and such other information as
the Membership Department may
request.
(g)–(j) No change.
*
*
*
*
*
Rule 923. [Reserved] Review of
Membership Department Decisions
If the Membership Department takes
an adverse action with respect to a
membership application, permit
application, or other matter for which
the Membership Department has
responsibility, the department will
notify the applicant in writing of the
specific grounds for denial and the
applicant shall have a right to a hearing.
Any appeal from a decision of the
E:\FR\FM\03SEN1.SGM
03SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 170 / Tuesday, September 3, 2013 / Notices
Membership Department shall be heard
by a special committee of the Board of
Directors composed of three (3)
Directors, of whom at least one (1) shall
be a Public Director. The person
requesting review may appeal by filing
a written notice thereof with the
Secretary of the Exchange within ten
(10) days after a decision. The person
requesting review shall be permitted to
submit a written statement to this
special committee. The Secretary of the
Exchange shall certify the record of the
proceeding, if any, and the written
decision and shall submit these
documents to the special committee.
The special committee’s review of the
action shall be based solely on the
record, the written decision and any
statement submitted by the person
requesting the review. The special
committee shall prepare and deliver to
such person a written decision and
reasons therefor. If the special
committee affirms the action, the action
shall become effective ten (10) days
from the date of the special committee’s
decision. There shall be no appeal to the
Board of Directors from any decision of
the special committee.
*
*
*
*
*
Rule 3212. Registration as a Market
Maker
(a) Quotations and quotation sizes
may be entered into PSX only by a
member organization registered as a
PSX Market Maker or other entity
approved by the Exchange to function in
a market-making capacity. Member
organizations seeking to become
registered as a PSX Market Maker must
comply with the applicable
requirements of Rule 910.
(b)–(c) No change.
*
*
*
*
*
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:57 Aug 30, 2013
Jkt 229001
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange recently adopted rules
to allow market making on PSX.3 Rule
910(f) provides that member
organizations seeking to maintain their
status shall submit to the Exchange’s
Membership Department (the
‘‘Department’’) any information and
materials requested by the Department.
Pursuant to this authority, the
Department has determined that in the
event a member organization seeks to
become a market maker on PSX, it may
request information from the member
organization in order to evaluate its
qualifications. However, in order to
make the requirements of the rule
clearer, and to describe circumstances
in which submission of additional
information will not be deemed
necessary, the Exchange is proposing to
amend Rule 910.4
Specifically, the amended rule will
provide that a member organization
seeking to become a PSX Market Maker
must submit required material to the
Exchange’s Membership Department
unless the member organization’s
market making has previously been
approved by the Financial Industry
Regulation Authority (‘‘FINRA’’) under
the NASD Rule 1000 Series (or such
successor FINRA rules as FINRA may
adopt), The NASDAQ Stock Market
(‘‘NASDAQ’’) under the NASDAQ Rule
1000 Series, or NASDAQ OMX BX
(‘‘BX’’) under the BX Rule 1000 Series.
In this respect, the proposed rule is
modeled on NASDAQ Rules 1011 and
1017, which provide that a member’s
market making for the first time on
NASDAQ is considered a material
change in its business operations,
requiring approval by the NASDAQ
Membership Department, unless ‘‘the
member’s market making has previously
been approved by FINRA under NASD
Rule 1017 or NASDAQ OMX BX under
NASDAQ OMX BX Equity Rule 1017.’’ 5
Thus, the rule recognizes the work
3 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 69452
(April 25, 2013), 78 FR 25512 (May 1, 2013) (SR–
Phlx–2013–24).
4 In addition, the Exchange is adding a crossreference to Rule 910 to Rule 3212, which governs
registration of PSX market makers in specific
securities for which they intend to make markets.
5 The proposed Phlx rule is slightly broader, in
that it would recognize a new member’s approval
as a market maker, or an existing member’s
approval as a market maker, under the Rule 1000
Series of the referenced self-regulatory
organizations. The referenced rules govern both
new membership applications and applications for
a change in business operations.
PO 00000
Frm 00116
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54347
performed by other self-regulatory
organizations in vetting the capability of
the member to perform market making
functions.
In cases where a Phlx member
organization has not been previously
approved to engage in market making by
FINRA, NASDAQ, or BX, the member
organization would be required (i) to
submit to the Membership Department
an application in the form approved by
the Membership Department and any
other information and material
requested by the Membership
Department; (ii) to have had such
application approved by the
Membership Department; and (iii) to
meet such other requirements as are set
forth in these [sic] By-Laws or the Rules
of the Exchange (e.g., compliance with
Rule 3213 (Registration as a Market
Maker) and Rule 911 (Member and
Member Organization Participation)).
The information to be provided shall
include a business plan, an
organizational chart, written
supervisory procedures reflecting the
change, and such other information as
the Membership Department may
request. This information is similar to
the information required under
NASDAQ Rule 1017(b) in similar
circumstances.6 The Exchange believes
that such information will enable the
Membership Department to review
details necessary to assess the capability
of the member organization to act in a
market making capacity.
Phlx is also proposing to move Rule
900.2(d), which addresses appeals from
denials of membership or permit
applications by the Membership
Department, to new Rule 923. In
addition, Phlx proposes broadening the
scope of the moved rule to apply to any
adverse decision of the Membership
Department, so that the rule applies to
decisions with respect to market making
under Rule 910. Rule 923 provides that
if the Membership Department takes an
adverse action with respect to a
membership application, permit
application, or other matter for which
the Membership Department has
responsibility, the department will
notify the applicant in writing of the
specific grounds for denial and the
applicant shall have a right to a hearing.
An appeal would be heard by a special
committee of the Board of Directors
6 In contrast to the NASDAQ Rule, however, the
Phlx rule will not specifically require the applicant
to provide pro forma financial statements, which
Phlx believes are unlikely to provide materially
useful information about the applicant. The
proposed rule is sufficiently broad, however, to
allow the Membership Department to request such
information if deemed appropriate in a specific
case.
E:\FR\FM\03SEN1.SGM
03SEN1
54348
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 170 / Tuesday, September 3, 2013 / Notices
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
composed of three Directors, of whom at
least one shall be a Public Director. The
person requesting review may appeal by
filing a written notice thereof with the
Secretary of the Exchange within ten
days after a decision. The person
requesting review is permitted to submit
a written statement to this special
committee. The Secretary of the
Exchange shall certify the record of the
proceeding, if any, and the written
decision and shall submit these
documents to the special committee.
The special committee’s review of the
action shall be based solely on the
record, the written decision and any
statement submitted by the person
requesting the review. The special
committee shall prepare and deliver to
such person a written decision and
reasons therefor. If the special
committee affirms the action, the action
shall become effective ten days from the
date of the special committee’s decision.
The decision of the special committee
may not be appealed to the Board of
Directors, and would thus constitute
final action by the Exchange.
2. Statutory Basis
Phlx believes that the proposed rule
change is consistent with the provisions
of Section 6 of the Act,7 in general, and
with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,8 in
particular, in that the proposal is
designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in
regulating, clearing, settling, processing
information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to
remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest. Specifically, the
proposed rule change will make it clear
that member organizations seeking to
make markets on PSX for the first time
will be required to submit information
necessary to allow the Phlx Membership
Department to assess the capability of
the member organization to act in that
capacity. The rule change will also
relieve member organizations seeking to
make markets on PSX for the first time
from the requirement to submit to prereview by the Membership Department
in instances where they have already
undergone such a review under the
rules of FINRA, NASDAQ or BX. The
rule change also broadens the scope of
what may be appealed to a special
committee of the Board of Directors to
7 15
8 15
U.S.C. 78f.
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) [sic] and (5).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:57 Aug 30, 2013
Jkt 229001
include any adverse action of the
Membership Department for which it
has responsibility. The Exchange
believes that it is appropriate to apply
a consistent process to all adverse
actions of the Membership Department,
including adverse decisions concerning
applications to obtain and maintain the
status of a Market Maker, as it will
lessen the burden on member
organizations should they otherwise be
required to comply with multiple
appellate processes. Moreover, adopting
a uniform appellate process will
promote consistent reviews of matters
concerning membership-related adverse
actions. Accordingly, Phlx believes that
the rule change will remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market,
and protect investors and the public
interest, because it will clarify the scope
of regulatory review by the Phlx
Membership Department while also
relieving member organizations of
unnecessary regulatory burdens.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will result in
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. Specifically,
by clarifying the scope of regulatory
review by the Phlx Membership
Department of member organizations
seeking to become market makers on
PSX, the rule change reflects
appropriate regulatory reviews with
respect to member organizations
engaging in a new market activity and
provides a uniform process applied to
appeals of all adverse actions taken by
the Membership Department. To the
extent that this review may be seen as
a burden on competition because it may
limit the extent to which a member
organization may make markets, or slow
the timing of a member organization
entering this business, such burdens are
appropriate in light of the importance of
assessing a member organization’s
capability. Moreover, the change to
provide that review is not necessary in
the case of member organizations
approved to make markets by other
SROs will help mitigate any burden
created by the new rule by eliminating
duplicative regulatory reviews. The
Exchange believes that the efficiency
and consistency that comes from
applying a uniform process to any
adverse action of the Membership
Department lessens the burden on a
member organization that appeals such
an action as it would otherwise be
required to follow differing processes,
PO 00000
Frm 00117
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
depending on the nature of the adverse
action taken.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule
change does not: (i) Significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) become
operative for 30 days from the date on
which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate, it has
become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) [sic] of the Act 9 and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b–4
thereunder.10
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is: (i) Necessary or appropriate in
the public interest; (ii) for the protection
of investors; or (iii) otherwise in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
Phlx–2013–84 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Phlx–2013–84. This file
number should be included on the
9 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(a)(ii) [sic].
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6) requires a self-regulatory organization to give
the Commission written notice of its intent to file
the proposed rule change at least five business days
prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this
requirement.
10 17
E:\FR\FM\03SEN1.SGM
03SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 170 / Tuesday, September 3, 2013 / Notices
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
publicly available. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–Phlx–
2013–84 and should be submitted on or
before September 24, 2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.11
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–21298 Filed 8–30–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–70263; File No. SR–NSCC–
2013–09]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
National Securities Clearing
Corporation; Order Approving
Proposed Rule Change Relating to the
Decommissioning of NSCC’s Over-theCounter (OTC) Equity Comparison
Service
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
August 27, 2013.
On July 2, 2013, the National
Securities Clearing Corporation filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change SR–NSCC–2013–
09 pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
11 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:57 Aug 30, 2013
Jkt 229001
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder.2
The proposed rule change was
published for comment in the Federal
Register on July 18, 2013.3 The
Commission did not receive any
comments on the proposed rule change.
This order approves the proposed rule
change.
I. Description
NSCC is amending its rules to
decommission the over-the-counter
(‘‘OTC’’) Equity Comparison Service and
delete two obsolete provisions in
Procedure II, ‘‘Trade Comparison and
Recording Service.’’
OTC Equity Comparison Service
Currently, NSCC provides a
framework to compare and record
transactions in eligible equity and debt
securities executed on national stock
exchanges and in the OTC market, as
provided in Rule 7 and Procedure II.4
Rule 7 and Procedure II both note that
NSCC will stop providing comparison
services once each exchange and/or
marketplace assumes responsibility for
trade comparison.5 According to NSCC,
all marketplaces interfacing with NSCC
have assumed responsibility for equity
comparison and, as a result, NSCC’s
OTC Equity Comparison Service
receives a nominal amount of over-thecounter bilateral equity transaction
submissions.6 Therefore, NSCC is
decommissioning its OTC Equity
Comparison Service and amend several
rules to reflect this, as described below.
This change will not impact
comparison services with respect to
debt transactions, which are compared
through the Real Time Trade Matching
(or ‘‘RTTM’’) system, or transactions
submitted to the Obligation
Warehouse.7
Once the OTC Equity Comparison
service is decommissioned, comparison
submissions for equity transactions,
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 69980 (July
12, 2013), 78 FR 42989 (July 18, 2013) (SR–NSCC–
2013–09) (‘‘Notice’’).
4 See NSCC Rule 7 and Procedure II; See Notice,
supra note 3 at 42989–90.
5 See NSCC Rule 7 note 1 and Procedure II note
1.
6 See Notice, supra note 3 at 42990. According to
NSCC, during May 2013, NSCC compared
approximately 90 sides (an approximate average of
45 trades) for equity transactions through its OTC
Comparison service. As of June 24, 2013, NSCC
compared a total of 74 sides (37 trades) for the
entire month of June 2013 to date. See id. at note
3.
7 NSCC provides an Obligation Warehouse service
under which certain transactions may be submitted
for comparison that are not otherwise submitted for
processing to NSCC through its other services. See
NSCC Rule 51 and Procedure IIA; Notice, supra
note 3 at 42990.
2 17
PO 00000
Frm 00118
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54349
other than those submitted to the
Obligation Warehouse, will not be
accepted by NSCC and related output
will not be produced.8 As a result, upon
the effective date of this proposal, all
equity transactions submitted for
processing to NSCC, other than those
submitted through the Obligation
Warehouse, must be compared prior to
submission (i.e., at the marketplace of
execution or through FINRA/NASDAQ’s
Automated Comparison Transaction
facility (‘‘ACT’’) and submitted to NSCC
on a locked-in basis for trade
recording).9
Changes to Rule 7, Procedure II, Rule 5,
Rule 1, Addendum A, and Addendum K
To facilitate this proposal, NSCC is
amending several rules. NSCC is
amending Rule 7, ‘‘Comparison and
Trade Recording Operation,’’ and
Procedure II, ‘‘Trade Comparison and
Recording Service’’ to reflect changes
consistent with the above. These
changes also require certain technical
changes including re-numbering
footnotes and updating cross-references.
NSCC is amending Rule 5, ‘‘General
Provisions’’ to reflect changes consistent
with the above and to clarify that output
issued by NSCC with respect to
transactions either compared by it, or
recorded locked-in transactions, defined
as ‘‘Compared Contracts,’’ evidence
valid, binding and enforceable
compared transactions for purposes of
the Rules.
NSCC is amending Rule 1,
‘‘Definitions’’ to add the definition of
‘‘Compared Contracts’’ as described in
Rule 5.
NSCC is amending its fee schedule in
Addendum A to delete references to
charges associated with OTC equity
comparison.
NSCC is amending Addendum K to
update a cross-reference to reflect these
proposed changes.
Obsolete Provisions in Procedure II
NSCC also is deleting two obsolete
provisions in Procedure II. First, NSCC
is deleting a provision relating to the
submission of municipal securities
transactions by members on behalf of
non-members since the function is no
longer in use.10 Second, NSCC is
deleting a provision relating to potential
announcement via Important Notice of
the availability of the comparison
service for when-issued corporate
securities. According to NSCC, NSCC
has not scheduled to implement a
comparison service for corporate when8 See
Notice, supra note 3 at 42990.
id.
10 See id.
9 See
E:\FR\FM\03SEN1.SGM
03SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 170 (Tuesday, September 3, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54346-54349]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-21298]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-70270; File No. SR-Phlx-2013-84]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change to Amend
Phlx Rule 910 and Related Phlx Rules
August 27, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on August 14, 2013, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC (``Phlx'' or ``Exchange'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') a
proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which
Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend Phlx Rule 910 (Qualification as
Member Organization) and related Phlx rules. The text of the proposed
rule change is below. Proposed additions are in italics and proposed
deletions are in brackets.
Rule 900.2. Membership Applications
(a)-(c) No change.
(d) [If the Membership Department does not approve a membership
application or permit application, the department will notify the
applicant in writing of the specific grounds for denial and the
applicant shall have a right to a hearing. Any appeal from a decision
of the Membership Department shall be heard by a special committee of
the Board of Directors composed of three (3) Directors, of whom at
least one (1) shall be a Public Director. The person requesting review
may appeal by filing a written notice thereof with the Secretary of the
Exchange within ten (10) days after a decision. The person requesting
review shall be permitted to submit a written statement to this special
committee. The Secretary of the Exchange shall certify the record of
the proceeding, if any and the written decision and shall submit these
documents to the special committee. The special committee's review of
the action shall be based solely on the record, the written decision
and any statement submitted by the person requesting the review. The
special committee shall prepare and deliver to such person a written
decision and reasons therefor. If the special committee affirms the
action, the action shall become effective ten (10) days from the date
of the special committee's decision. There shall be no appeal to the
Board of Directors from any decision of the special committee.
(e)] Absent a showing of good cause, an application filed pursuant
to this Rule shall lapse after a 90 calendar day period if an applicant
fails to provide the requisite documentation provided for in this Rule
or any subsequent written request for information or documents pursuant
to this Rule within such time period agreed to by the Membership
Department. If such time period elapses, an applicant seeking
membership to the Exchange shall be required to file a new application
pursuant to this Rule. The applicant will be required to pay an
additional application fee at that time. The Exchange will not refund
any fees for lapsed applications.
[(f)] (e) The provisions of this Rule 900.2 shall not apply to a
corporation pursuant to Rule 798.
* * * * *
Rule 910. Qualification as Member Organization
(a)-(e) No change.
(f)(1) To obtain and maintain the status of a member organization,
an organization shall: (i) Be a broker or dealer duly registered under
the Exchange Act; (ii) be duly qualified by a permit holder who is
primarily affiliated with such organization for purposes of nominating
as provided in the By-Laws; (iii) have submitted to the Membership
Department an application for such status in the form approved by the
Membership Department and any other information and materials requested
by the Membership Department; (iv) have had such application approved
by the Membership Department; and (v) meet such other requirements as
are set forth in these By-Laws or the Rules of the Exchange.
(2) To obtain and maintain the status of a Market Maker on PSX, a
member organization whose market making has not previously been
approved by FINRA under the NASD Rule 1000 Series (or such successor
FINRA Rules as may be adopted by FINRA), NASDAQ under the NASDAQ Rule
1000 Series, or NASDAQ OMX BX under the BX Rule 1000 Series shall: (i)
Have submitted to the Membership Department an application for such
status in the form approved by the Membership Department and any other
information and material requested by the Membership Department; (ii)
have had such application approved by the Membership Department; and
(iii) meet such other requirements as are set forth in the By-Laws or
Rules of the Exchange. The information to be provided shall include a
business plan, an organizational chart, written supervisory procedures
reflecting the change, and such other information as the Membership
Department may request.
(g)-(j) No change.
* * * * *
Rule 923. [Reserved] Review of Membership Department Decisions
If the Membership Department takes an adverse action with respect
to a membership application, permit application, or other matter for
which the Membership Department has responsibility, the department will
notify the applicant in writing of the specific grounds for denial and
the applicant shall have a right to a hearing. Any appeal from a
decision of the
[[Page 54347]]
Membership Department shall be heard by a special committee of the
Board of Directors composed of three (3) Directors, of whom at least
one (1) shall be a Public Director. The person requesting review may
appeal by filing a written notice thereof with the Secretary of the
Exchange within ten (10) days after a decision. The person requesting
review shall be permitted to submit a written statement to this special
committee. The Secretary of the Exchange shall certify the record of
the proceeding, if any, and the written decision and shall submit these
documents to the special committee. The special committee's review of
the action shall be based solely on the record, the written decision
and any statement submitted by the person requesting the review. The
special committee shall prepare and deliver to such person a written
decision and reasons therefor. If the special committee affirms the
action, the action shall become effective ten (10) days from the date
of the special committee's decision. There shall be no appeal to the
Board of Directors from any decision of the special committee.
* * * * *
Rule 3212. Registration as a Market Maker
(a) Quotations and quotation sizes may be entered into PSX only by
a member organization registered as a PSX Market Maker or other entity
approved by the Exchange to function in a market-making capacity.
Member organizations seeking to become registered as a PSX Market Maker
must comply with the applicable requirements of Rule 910.
(b)-(c) No change.
* * * * *
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange recently adopted rules to allow market making on
PSX.\3\ Rule 910(f) provides that member organizations seeking to
maintain their status shall submit to the Exchange's Membership
Department (the ``Department'') any information and materials requested
by the Department. Pursuant to this authority, the Department has
determined that in the event a member organization seeks to become a
market maker on PSX, it may request information from the member
organization in order to evaluate its qualifications. However, in order
to make the requirements of the rule clearer, and to describe
circumstances in which submission of additional information will not be
deemed necessary, the Exchange is proposing to amend Rule 910.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 69452 (April 25, 2013),
78 FR 25512 (May 1, 2013) (SR-Phlx-2013-24).
\4\ In addition, the Exchange is adding a cross-reference to
Rule 910 to Rule 3212, which governs registration of PSX market
makers in specific securities for which they intend to make markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Specifically, the amended rule will provide that a member
organization seeking to become a PSX Market Maker must submit required
material to the Exchange's Membership Department unless the member
organization's market making has previously been approved by the
Financial Industry Regulation Authority (``FINRA'') under the NASD Rule
1000 Series (or such successor FINRA rules as FINRA may adopt), The
NASDAQ Stock Market (``NASDAQ'') under the NASDAQ Rule 1000 Series, or
NASDAQ OMX BX (``BX'') under the BX Rule 1000 Series. In this respect,
the proposed rule is modeled on NASDAQ Rules 1011 and 1017, which
provide that a member's market making for the first time on NASDAQ is
considered a material change in its business operations, requiring
approval by the NASDAQ Membership Department, unless ``the member's
market making has previously been approved by FINRA under NASD Rule
1017 or NASDAQ OMX BX under NASDAQ OMX BX Equity Rule 1017.'' \5\ Thus,
the rule recognizes the work performed by other self-regulatory
organizations in vetting the capability of the member to perform market
making functions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The proposed Phlx rule is slightly broader, in that it would
recognize a new member's approval as a market maker, or an existing
member's approval as a market maker, under the Rule 1000 Series of
the referenced self-regulatory organizations. The referenced rules
govern both new membership applications and applications for a
change in business operations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In cases where a Phlx member organization has not been previously
approved to engage in market making by FINRA, NASDAQ, or BX, the member
organization would be required (i) to submit to the Membership
Department an application in the form approved by the Membership
Department and any other information and material requested by the
Membership Department; (ii) to have had such application approved by
the Membership Department; and (iii) to meet such other requirements as
are set forth in these [sic] By-Laws or the Rules of the Exchange
(e.g., compliance with Rule 3213 (Registration as a Market Maker) and
Rule 911 (Member and Member Organization Participation)). The
information to be provided shall include a business plan, an
organizational chart, written supervisory procedures reflecting the
change, and such other information as the Membership Department may
request. This information is similar to the information required under
NASDAQ Rule 1017(b) in similar circumstances.\6\ The Exchange believes
that such information will enable the Membership Department to review
details necessary to assess the capability of the member organization
to act in a market making capacity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ In contrast to the NASDAQ Rule, however, the Phlx rule will
not specifically require the applicant to provide pro forma
financial statements, which Phlx believes are unlikely to provide
materially useful information about the applicant. The proposed rule
is sufficiently broad, however, to allow the Membership Department
to request such information if deemed appropriate in a specific
case.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phlx is also proposing to move Rule 900.2(d), which addresses
appeals from denials of membership or permit applications by the
Membership Department, to new Rule 923. In addition, Phlx proposes
broadening the scope of the moved rule to apply to any adverse decision
of the Membership Department, so that the rule applies to decisions
with respect to market making under Rule 910. Rule 923 provides that if
the Membership Department takes an adverse action with respect to a
membership application, permit application, or other matter for which
the Membership Department has responsibility, the department will
notify the applicant in writing of the specific grounds for denial and
the applicant shall have a right to a hearing. An appeal would be heard
by a special committee of the Board of Directors
[[Page 54348]]
composed of three Directors, of whom at least one shall be a Public
Director. The person requesting review may appeal by filing a written
notice thereof with the Secretary of the Exchange within ten days after
a decision. The person requesting review is permitted to submit a
written statement to this special committee. The Secretary of the
Exchange shall certify the record of the proceeding, if any, and the
written decision and shall submit these documents to the special
committee. The special committee's review of the action shall be based
solely on the record, the written decision and any statement submitted
by the person requesting the review. The special committee shall
prepare and deliver to such person a written decision and reasons
therefor. If the special committee affirms the action, the action shall
become effective ten days from the date of the special committee's
decision. The decision of the special committee may not be appealed to
the Board of Directors, and would thus constitute final action by the
Exchange.
2. Statutory Basis
Phlx believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the
provisions of Section 6 of the Act,\7\ in general, and with Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,\8\ in particular, in that the proposal is designed
to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote
just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling,
processing information with respect to, and facilitating transactions
in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest. Specifically, the proposed
rule change will make it clear that member organizations seeking to
make markets on PSX for the first time will be required to submit
information necessary to allow the Phlx Membership Department to assess
the capability of the member organization to act in that capacity. The
rule change will also relieve member organizations seeking to make
markets on PSX for the first time from the requirement to submit to
pre-review by the Membership Department in instances where they have
already undergone such a review under the rules of FINRA, NASDAQ or BX.
The rule change also broadens the scope of what may be appealed to a
special committee of the Board of Directors to include any adverse
action of the Membership Department for which it has responsibility.
The Exchange believes that it is appropriate to apply a consistent
process to all adverse actions of the Membership Department, including
adverse decisions concerning applications to obtain and maintain the
status of a Market Maker, as it will lessen the burden on member
organizations should they otherwise be required to comply with multiple
appellate processes. Moreover, adopting a uniform appellate process
will promote consistent reviews of matters concerning membership-
related adverse actions. Accordingly, Phlx believes that the rule
change will remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free
and open market, and protect investors and the public interest, because
it will clarify the scope of regulatory review by the Phlx Membership
Department while also relieving member organizations of unnecessary
regulatory burdens.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) [sic] and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Specifically, by
clarifying the scope of regulatory review by the Phlx Membership
Department of member organizations seeking to become market makers on
PSX, the rule change reflects appropriate regulatory reviews with
respect to member organizations engaging in a new market activity and
provides a uniform process applied to appeals of all adverse actions
taken by the Membership Department. To the extent that this review may
be seen as a burden on competition because it may limit the extent to
which a member organization may make markets, or slow the timing of a
member organization entering this business, such burdens are
appropriate in light of the importance of assessing a member
organization's capability. Moreover, the change to provide that review
is not necessary in the case of member organizations approved to make
markets by other SROs will help mitigate any burden created by the new
rule by eliminating duplicative regulatory reviews. The Exchange
believes that the efficiency and consistency that comes from applying a
uniform process to any adverse action of the Membership Department
lessens the burden on a member organization that appeals such an action
as it would otherwise be required to follow differing processes,
depending on the nature of the adverse action taken.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) [sic] of the Act \9\ and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(a)(ii) [sic].
\10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i)
Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the
protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-Phlx-2013-84 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2013-84. This file
number should be included on the
[[Page 54349]]
subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and
review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The
Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site
(https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all
subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the
proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all
written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from
the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission's Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of
such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make publicly available. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-Phlx-2013-84 and should be submitted on or before
September 24, 2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-21298 Filed 8-30-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P