Certain Laundry and Household Cleaning Products and Related Packaging, 53479 [2013-21070]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2013 / Notices
Authority: The authority for institution of
this investigation is contained in section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and
in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10
(2013).
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337–TA–891]
Certain Laundry and Household
Cleaning Products and Related
Packaging
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on July
25, 2013, under section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.
1337, on behalf of The Clorox Company.
The complaint alleges violations of
section 337 based upon the importation
into the United States, the sale for
importation, and the sale within the
United States after importation of
certain laundry and household cleaning
products and packing thereof by reason
of trademark infringement and
trademark dilution. Complainant alleges
that an industry in the United States
exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of
section 337 and that proposed
respondents’ unfair methods of
competition and unfair acts threaten to
destroy or substantially injure an
industry in the United States.
The complainants request that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue a
limited exclusion order and cease and
desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–
2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained
by accessing its internet server at https://
www.usitc.gov. The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
Office of Unfair Import Investigations,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205–2560.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:34 Aug 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
August 22, 2013, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine:
(a) Whether there is a violation of
subsection (a)(1)(C) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, or the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain laundry and household cleaning
products and packaging thereof by
reason of trademark infringement, and
whether an industry in the United
States exists as required by subsection
(a)(2) of section 337;
(b) Whether there is a violation of
subsection (a)(1)(A) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, or the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain laundry and household cleaning
products and packing thereof by reason
of unfair methods of competition,
trademark dilution and unfair acts, the
threat or effect of which is to destroy or
substantially injure an industry in the
United States.;
(2) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainant is: The Clorox
Company, 1221 Broadway, Oakland, CA
94612.
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Industrias Alen, S.A. de C.V., Blvd. Diaz
Ordaz No. 1000, Col. Los Trevino, Sta.
Catarina, N.L., Mexico.
Alen USA, LLC, 9326 Baythorne Drive,
Houston, TX 77041.
(c) The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite
401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(3) For the investigation so instituted,
the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
shall designate the presiding
Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
53479
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such
responses will be considered by the
Commission if received not later than 20
days after the date of service by the
Commission of the complaint and the
notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
Issued: August 23, 2013.
By order of the Commission.
William R. Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information
Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013–21070 Filed 8–28–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree
Under the Clean Air Act (‘‘CAA’’)
On August 23, 2013, the Department
of Justice lodged a proposed Consent
Decree with the United States District
Court for the District of Utah, Northern
Division, in the lawsuit entitled United
States and State of Utah v. Big West Oil,
LLC, 1:13–cv–00121–BCW. The
settlement relates to Big West Oil LLC’s
(‘‘Big West Oil’’) petroleum refinery
located in North Salt Lake, Utah (the
‘‘BWO Refinery’’).
The proposed Consent Decree
resolves claims of the United States and
the State of Utah under the Clean Air
Act and claims of the State of Utah
under the Utah Air Conservation Act
related to the BWO Refinery. Under the
proposed Consent Decree, Big West Oil
will pay a civil penalty in the amount
of $157,500 to the United States and
$17,500 to the State of Utah. In addition,
the Consent Decree imposes emission
limits on several pollutants at multiple
units, requires improved flaring
efficiency, and enhanced controls for
leak detection and repair and benzene-
E:\FR\FM\29AUN1.SGM
29AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 168 (Thursday, August 29, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 53479]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-21070]
[[Page 53479]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337-TA-891]
Certain Laundry and Household Cleaning Products and Related
Packaging
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on July 25, 2013, under section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of The
Clorox Company. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based
upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation,
and the sale within the United States after importation of certain
laundry and household cleaning products and packing thereof by reason
of trademark infringement and trademark dilution. Complainant alleges
that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection
(a)(2) of section 337 and that proposed respondents' unfair methods of
competition and unfair acts threaten to destroy or substantially injure
an industry in the United States.
The complainants request that the Commission institute an
investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion
order and cease and desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room 112, Washington,
DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. Hearing impaired individuals are
advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting
the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-
2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202)
205-2560.
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation
is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,
and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2013).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on August 22, 2013, ordered that--
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine:
(a) Whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(C) of section
337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for
importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of
certain laundry and household cleaning products and packaging thereof
by reason of trademark infringement, and whether an industry in the
United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
(b) Whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(A) of section
337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for
importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of
certain laundry and household cleaning products and packing thereof by
reason of unfair methods of competition, trademark dilution and unfair
acts, the threat or effect of which is to destroy or substantially
injure an industry in the United States.;
(2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainant is: The Clorox Company, 1221 Broadway, Oakland,
CA 94612.
(b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint
is to be served:
Industrias Alen, S.A. de C.V., Blvd. Diaz Ordaz No. 1000, Col. Los
Trevino, Sta. Catarina, N.L., Mexico.
Alen USA, LLC, 9326 Baythorne Drive, Houston, TX 77041.
(c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436;
and
(3) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent,
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.
Issued: August 23, 2013.
By order of the Commission.
William R. Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013-21070 Filed 8-28-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P