Certain Semiconductor Chips With Dram Circuitry, and Modules and Products Containing Same: Notice of Commission Determination To Terminate the Investigation Based on Settlement, 53159 [2013-20952]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2013 / Notices
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–819]
Certain Semiconductor Chips With
Dram Circuitry, and Modules and
Products Containing Same: Notice of
Commission Determination To
Terminate the Investigation Based on
Settlement
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined to
terminate the above-captioned
investigation based on a settlement
agreement between the parties.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Clark S. Cheney, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–
205–2661. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone 202–205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov).
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.
usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are
advised that information on this matter
can be obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on December 21, 2011, based on a
complaint filed by Elpida Memory, Inc.,
of Tokyo, Japan, and Elpida Memory
(USA) Inc. of Sunnyvale, California
(collectively, ‘‘Elpida’’). 76 FR 79215
(Dec. 21, 2011). The complaint alleged
violations of section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C.
1337), based on infringement of several
U.S. patents. The notice of investigation
named Nanya Technology Corporation
of Tao Yuan, Taiwan, and Nanya
Technology Corporation, U.S.A. of
Santa Clara, California (collectively,
‘‘Nanya’’), as respondents. The Office of
Unfair Import Investigations did not
participate in the investigation.
On March 26, 2013, the ALJ issued a
final initial determination (‘‘ID’’) finding
a violation of section 337 with respect
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:21 Aug 27, 2013
Jkt 229001
to several patents but not with respect
to U.S. Patent No. 7,659,571 (‘‘the ’571
patent’’). On April 8, 2013, complainant
Elpida and Nanya filed petitions for
review of certain portions of the ID but
not for review of the determination of
no violation with respect to the ’571
patent. On July 2, 2013, the Commission
determined not to review the
determination of no violation with
respect to the ’571 patent and that
determination became final. The
Commission determined to review the
remainder of the ID and requested
certain briefing from the parties and
from the public.
On July 31, 2013, the parties jointly
moved for termination of the
investigation based on a settlement
agreement.
The Commission has determined that
the motion to terminate the
investigation based on a settlement
agreement complies with Commission
Rule 210.21 (19 CFR 210.21). The
Commission has further determined that
terminating the investigation based on
the settlement agreement between
Elpida and Nanya is not contrary to the
public interest. Accordingly, the
Commission has determined to grant the
joint motion and terminate the
investigation.
The issues previously under review
by the Commission are now moot in
view of the parties’ settlement. The
portions of the ID previously under
review by the Commission do not
constitute a Commission determination
and have been set aside. See
Commission Rule 210.45(c) (19 CFR
210.45(c)).
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR Part
210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: August 22, 2013.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2013–20952 Filed 8–27–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE
UNITED STATES
Meeting of the Judicial Conference
Committee on Rules of Practice and
Procedure
Judicial Conference of the
United States Advisory Committee on
Rules of Criminal Procedure.
ACTION: Notice of open meeting.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
53159
The Advisory Committee on
Rules of Criminal Procedure will hold a
one-day meeting. The meeting will be
open to public observation but not
participation.
DATES: October 18, 2013.
Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
ADDRESSES: University of Utah, S.J.
Quinney College of Law, 332 South
1400 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84112.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jonathan C. Rose, Secretary and Chief
Rules Officer, Rules Committee Support
Office, Administrative Office of the
United States Courts, Washington, DC
20544, telephone (202) 502–1820.
SUMMARY:
Dated: August 23, 2013.
Jonathan C. Rose,
Secretary and Chief Rules Officer .
[FR Doc. 2013–20980 Filed 8–27–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
[Docket No. OSHA–2010–0037]
Standard for Welding, Cutting, and
Brazing; Extension of the Office of
Management and Budget’s (OMB)
Approval of Information Collection
(Paperwork) Requirements
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Request for public comments.
AGENCY:
OSHA solicits public
comments concerning its proposal to
extend the Office of Management and
Budget’s (OMB) approval of the
information collection requirements
contained in the Standard for Welding,
Cutting, and Brazing (29 CFR Part 1910,
Subpart Q). The information collected is
used by employers and workers
whenever welding, cutting, and brazing
are performed. The purpose of the
information is to ensure that employers
evaluate hazards associated with
welding and ensure that adequate
measures are taken to make the process
safe.
DATES: Comments must be submitted
(postmarked, sent, or received) by
October 28, 2013.
ADDRESSES:
Electronically: You may submit
comments and attachments
electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov, which is the
Federal eRulemaking Portal. Follow the
instructions online for submitting
comments.
Facsimile: If your comments,
including attachments, are not longer
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\28AUN1.SGM
28AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 167 (Wednesday, August 28, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 53159]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-20952]
[[Page 53159]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-819]
Certain Semiconductor Chips With Dram Circuitry, and Modules and
Products Containing Same: Notice of Commission Determination To
Terminate the Investigation Based on Settlement
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined to terminate the above-captioned
investigation based on a settlement agreement between the parties.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clark S. Cheney, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2661. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are
or will be available for inspection during official business hours
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-
1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation
on December 21, 2011, based on a complaint filed by Elpida Memory,
Inc., of Tokyo, Japan, and Elpida Memory (USA) Inc. of Sunnyvale,
California (collectively, ``Elpida''). 76 FR 79215 (Dec. 21, 2011). The
complaint alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), based on infringement of several U.S.
patents. The notice of investigation named Nanya Technology Corporation
of Tao Yuan, Taiwan, and Nanya Technology Corporation, U.S.A. of Santa
Clara, California (collectively, ``Nanya''), as respondents. The Office
of Unfair Import Investigations did not participate in the
investigation.
On March 26, 2013, the ALJ issued a final initial determination
(``ID'') finding a violation of section 337 with respect to several
patents but not with respect to U.S. Patent No. 7,659,571 (``the '571
patent''). On April 8, 2013, complainant Elpida and Nanya filed
petitions for review of certain portions of the ID but not for review
of the determination of no violation with respect to the '571 patent.
On July 2, 2013, the Commission determined not to review the
determination of no violation with respect to the '571 patent and that
determination became final. The Commission determined to review the
remainder of the ID and requested certain briefing from the parties and
from the public.
On July 31, 2013, the parties jointly moved for termination of the
investigation based on a settlement agreement.
The Commission has determined that the motion to terminate the
investigation based on a settlement agreement complies with Commission
Rule 210.21 (19 CFR 210.21). The Commission has further determined that
terminating the investigation based on the settlement agreement between
Elpida and Nanya is not contrary to the public interest. Accordingly,
the Commission has determined to grant the joint motion and terminate
the investigation.
The issues previously under review by the Commission are now moot
in view of the parties' settlement. The portions of the ID previously
under review by the Commission do not constitute a Commission
determination and have been set aside. See Commission Rule 210.45(c)
(19 CFR 210.45(c)).
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
Part 210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: August 22, 2013.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2013-20952 Filed 8-27-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P