North American Free-Trade Agreement (NAFTA), Article 1904 Binational Panel Reviews, 51708 [2013-20130]
Download as PDF
51708
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 21, 2013 / Notices
Background
On June 28, 2013, the Department
initiated an administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on polyester
staple fiber from Korea for the period
May 1, 2012, through April 30, 2013,1
based on requests by Petitioners and
Huvis Corporation (Huvis).2 Petitioners
requested a review of Huvis and
Woongjin Chemical Company, Ltd.
(Woongjin), and Huvis requested a
review of itself. Petitioners withdrew
their request for an administrative
review of Woongjin on July 8, 2013, and
of Huvis on July 17, 2013. Huvis
withdrew its own request for review on
July 23, 2013.
Rescission of Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the
Department will rescind an
administrative review, in whole or in
part, if the party that requested the
review withdraws its request within 90
days of the publication of the notice of
initiation of the requested review. In
this case, Petitioners and Huvis
withdrew their respective requests
within the 90-day deadline, and no
other parties requested an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order. Therefore, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1),
we are rescinding the administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
on polyester staple fiber from Korea
covering the period May 1, 2012,
through April 30, 2013, in its entirety.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Assessment
The Department will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
assess antidumping duties on all entries
of polyester staple fiber from Korea.
Antidumping duties shall be assessed at
rates equal to the cash deposit of
estimated antidumping duties required
at the time of entry, or withdrawal from
warehouse, for consumption, in
accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department
intends to issue appropriate assessment
instructions to CBP 15 days after the
date of publication of this notice of
rescission of administrative review.
Notifications
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
1 See
Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and
Request for Revocation in Part, 78 FR 38924, 38925
(June 28, 2013).
2 Petitioners are DAK Americas LLC and Auriga
Polymers, Inc.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:29 Aug 20, 2013
Jkt 229001
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
presumption that reimbursement of
antidumping duties occurred and the
subsequent assessment of doubled
antidumping duties.
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
return or destruction of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3).
Timely written notification of the return
or destruction of APO materials, or
conversion to judicial protective order,
is hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a violation that is subject to
sanction.
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: August 14, 2013.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2013–20444 Filed 8–20–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
North American Free-Trade Agreement
(NAFTA), Article 1904 Binational Panel
Reviews
NAFTA Secretariat, United
States Section, International Trade
Administration, Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of Decision of Panel.
AGENCY:
On August 6, 2013, the
NAFTA Chapter 19 binational panel
issued its decision in the review of the
final results of the 2008–2009
antidumping administrative review
made by the U.S. Department of
Commerce, with respect to Light-Walled
Rectangular Pipe and Tube from
Mexico, NAFTA Secretariat File
Number USA–MEX–2011–1904–02. The
panel affirmed the U.S. Department of
Commerce’s Final Determination
regarding this matter. Copies of the
panel’s decision are available from the
U.S. Section of the NAFTA Secretariat.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ellen M. Bohon, United States
Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat, Suite
2061, 14th and Constitution Avenue,
Washington, DC 20230, (202) 482–5438.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Chapter
19 of the North American Free-Trade
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
Agreement (‘‘Agreement’’) establishes a
mechanism to replace domestic judicial
review of final determinations in
antidumping and countervailing duty
cases involving imports from a NAFTA
country with review by independent
binational panels. When a Request for
Panel Review is filed, a panel is
established to act in place of national
courts to review expeditiously the final
determination to determine whether it
conforms with the antidumping or
countervailing duty law of the country
that made the determination.
Under Article 1904 of the Agreement,
which came into force on January 1,
1994, the Government of the United
States, the Government of Canada and
the Government of Mexico established
Rules of Procedure for Article 1904
Binational Panel Reviews (‘‘Rules’’).
These Rules were published in the
Federal Register on February 23, 1994
(59 FR 8686). The panel review in this
matter has been conducted in
accordance with these Rules.
Panel Decision: On December 5, 2012,
the binational panel affirmed in part
and remanded in part the matter of
Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube
from Mexico (NAFTA Secretariat File
Number USA–MEX–2011–1904–02).
The panel remanded to the U.S.
Department of Commerce to provide a
thorough explanation of its
interpretation of 19 U.S.C. 1677 (35) to
apply ‘‘zeroing’’ methodology in
connection with administrative reviews,
but not in antidumping investigations.
The panel directed Commerce to
provide such explanation within 90
days of the date of issue of the panel’s
order. (March 5, 2013) On March 4,
2013, the Department of Commerce
issued in response its Final Results of
Redetermination Pursuant to the
Remand. The Complainant,
Maquilacero, filed its Comments on the
Remand Results on May 1, 2013, and
the Department of Commerce filed its
related Response on June 17, 2013. On
August 6, 2013, in accordance with
Article 1904.8 of NAFTA, and for
reasons set out in the panel’s written
decision and related Order, the panel
affirmed the March 4, 2013, Final
Results of Redetermination Pursuant to
Remand of the Department of
Commerce.
Dated: August 6, 2013.
Ellen M. Bohon,
U.S. Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 2013–20130 Filed 8–20–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–GT–P
E:\FR\FM\21AUN1.SGM
21AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 162 (Wednesday, August 21, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 51708]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-20130]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
North American Free-Trade Agreement (NAFTA), Article 1904
Binational Panel Reviews
AGENCY: NAFTA Secretariat, United States Section, International Trade
Administration, Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of Decision of Panel.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On August 6, 2013, the NAFTA Chapter 19 binational panel
issued its decision in the review of the final results of the 2008-2009
antidumping administrative review made by the U.S. Department of
Commerce, with respect to Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from
Mexico, NAFTA Secretariat File Number USA-MEX-2011-1904-02. The panel
affirmed the U.S. Department of Commerce's Final Determination
regarding this matter. Copies of the panel's decision are available
from the U.S. Section of the NAFTA Secretariat.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen M. Bohon, United States
Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat, Suite 2061, 14th and Constitution Avenue,
Washington, DC 20230, (202) 482-5438.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Chapter 19 of the North American Free-Trade
Agreement (``Agreement'') establishes a mechanism to replace domestic
judicial review of final determinations in antidumping and
countervailing duty cases involving imports from a NAFTA country with
review by independent binational panels. When a Request for Panel
Review is filed, a panel is established to act in place of national
courts to review expeditiously the final determination to determine
whether it conforms with the antidumping or countervailing duty law of
the country that made the determination.
Under Article 1904 of the Agreement, which came into force on
January 1, 1994, the Government of the United States, the Government of
Canada and the Government of Mexico established Rules of Procedure for
Article 1904 Binational Panel Reviews (``Rules''). These Rules were
published in the Federal Register on February 23, 1994 (59 FR 8686).
The panel review in this matter has been conducted in accordance with
these Rules.
Panel Decision: On December 5, 2012, the binational panel affirmed
in part and remanded in part the matter of Light-Walled Rectangular
Pipe and Tube from Mexico (NAFTA Secretariat File Number USA-MEX-2011-
1904-02). The panel remanded to the U.S. Department of Commerce to
provide a thorough explanation of its interpretation of 19 U.S.C. 1677
(35) to apply ``zeroing'' methodology in connection with administrative
reviews, but not in antidumping investigations. The panel directed
Commerce to provide such explanation within 90 days of the date of
issue of the panel's order. (March 5, 2013) On March 4, 2013, the
Department of Commerce issued in response its Final Results of
Redetermination Pursuant to the Remand. The Complainant, Maquilacero,
filed its Comments on the Remand Results on May 1, 2013, and the
Department of Commerce filed its related Response on June 17, 2013. On
August 6, 2013, in accordance with Article 1904.8 of NAFTA, and for
reasons set out in the panel's written decision and related Order, the
panel affirmed the March 4, 2013, Final Results of Redetermination
Pursuant to Remand of the Department of Commerce.
Dated: August 6, 2013.
Ellen M. Bohon,
U.S. Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 2013-20130 Filed 8-20-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-GT-P