Self-Regulatory Organizations; EDGA Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to Amendments to the EDGA Exchange, Inc. Fee Schedule, 49588-49592 [2013-19668]
Download as PDF
49588
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 157 / Wednesday, August 14, 2013 / Notices
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.10
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–19665 Filed 8–13–13; 8:45 am]
principal office, and at the Public
Reference Room of the Commission.
of $0.0030 per share for orders that are
routed to LavaFlow and add liquidity.5
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
Elimination of the Tier Under Footnote
66
Currently, under Footnote 6, Members
can qualify for a decreased fee of
$0.0023 per share for orders yielding
Flag U where they post an average of
100,000 shares or more per day using
routing strategy ROLF (yielding Flag M).
The Exchange proposes to amend its Fee
Schedule to remove this pricing tier
under Footnote 6. This pricing tier
represented a pass through of the rate
that DE Route was charged for routing
orders to LavaFlow that qualify for an
identical volume tiered discount
provided by LavaFlow. When DE Route
routed to LavaFlow and satisfied its tier,
it was charged a reduced fee of $0.0023
per share. DE Route passed through this
rate on LavaFlow to the Exchange and
the Exchange, in turn, passed through
this rate to its Members. The Exchange
notes that the proposed change is in
response to LavaFlow’s recent fee
change where LavaFlow eliminated its
equivalent pricing tier from its fee
schedule.7 The Exchange also proposes
to remove references to Footnote 6 from
Flag U in the list of ‘‘Liquidity Flags.’’
Lastly, the Exchange notes that with the
deletion of this tier, Members will
continue to be subject to the other fees
and tiers listed on the Exchange’s Fee
Schedule.
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–70144; File No. SR–EDGA–
2013–23]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; EDGA
Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change Relating to Amendments
to the EDGA Exchange, Inc. Fee
Schedule
August 8, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on August 5,
2013, EDGA Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGA’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II and III
below, which items have been prepared
by the self-regulatory organization. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend its
fees and rebates applicable to Members 3
pursuant to EDGA Rule 15.1(a) and (c)
(‘‘Fee Schedule’’) to: (1) Increase the fee
charged from $0.0029 per share to
$0.0030 per share for orders that yield
Flag U, which routes to LavaFlow, Inc.
(‘‘LavaFlow’’); (2) eliminate
underutilized pricing tiers from its Fee
Schedule; and (3) make a number of
non-substantive amendments and
clarifications. All of the changes
described herein are applicable to EDGA
Members. The text of the proposed rule
change is available on the Exchange’s
Internet Web site at
www.directedge.com, at the Exchange’s
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
10 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 ‘‘Member’’ is defined as ‘‘any registered broker
or dealer, or any person associated with a registered
broker or dealer, that has been admitted to
membership in the Exchange. A Member will have
the status of a ‘‘member’’ of the Exchange as that
term is defined in Section 3(a)(3) of the Act.’’ EDGA
Rule 1.5(n).
1 15
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:16 Aug 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The self-regulatory organization has
prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B and C below, of the most
significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its
Fee Schedule to: (1) Increase the fee
charged from $0.0029 per share to
$0.0030 per share for orders that yield
Flag U, which routes to LavaFlow; (2)
eliminate underutilized pricing tiers
from its Fee Schedule; and (3) make a
number of non-substantive amendments
and clarifications.
Fee Change for Flag U
In securities priced at or above $1.00,
the Exchange currently assesses a fee of
$0.0029 per share for Members’ orders
that yield Flag U, which routes to
LavaFlow. The Exchange proposes to
amend its Fee Schedule to increase this
fee to $0.0030 per share for Members’
orders that yield Flag U. The proposed
change represents a pass through of the
rate that Direct Edge ECN LLC (d/b/a DE
Route) (‘‘DE Route’’), the Exchange’s
affiliated routing broker-dealer, is
charged for routing orders to LavaFlow
and do not qualify for a volume tiered
discount. When DE Route routes to
LavaFlow, it is charged a default fee of
$0.0030 per share.4 DE Route will pass
through this rate on LavaFlow to the
Exchange and the Exchange, in turn,
will pass through this rate to its
Members. The Exchange notes that the
proposed change is in response to
LavaFlow’s July 2013 fee change where
LavaFlow increased the rate it charges
its customers, such as DE Route, from a
charge of $0.0029 per share to a charge
4 The Exchange notes that to the extent DE Route
does or does not achieve any volume tiered
discount on LavaFlow, its rate for Flag U will not
change.
PO 00000
Frm 00145
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Elimination of Tiers Under Footnote 16
The Exchange proposes to eliminate
the pricing tiers included under
Footnote 16 because they are
underutilized by Members. Currently,
the Exchange offers the following
pricing tiers for Flag Q under Footnote
16:
• $0.0015 per share where the
Member posts greater than or equal to
0.30% of the total consolidated volume
(‘‘TCV’’) 8 in average daily volume
(‘‘ADV’’) 9 on the Exchange and routes
5 See LavaFlow Pricing, available at https://
www.lavatrading.com/solutions/pricing.php (July 1,
2013) (charging a fee of $0.0030 per share for
removing liquidity in shares priced at or above
$1.00) (last visited July 19, 2013).
6 References herein to ‘‘footnotes’’ refer only to
footnotes on the Exchange’s Fee Schedule and not
to footnotes within the current filing.
7 See LavaFlow Pricing, available at https://
www.lavatrading.com/solutions/pricing.php (July 1,
2013) (no longer charging a fee of $0.0023 per share
for members that post an average of 100,000 shares
or more per day) (last visited July 19, 2013).
8 TCV is defined as the volume reported by all
exchanges and the trade reporting facilities to the
consolidated transaction reporting plans for Tapes
A, B, and C securities for the month in which fees
are calculated.
9 ADV is defined as the average daily trading
volume of shares that a Member executed on the
Exchange.
E:\FR\FM\14AUN1.SGM
14AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 157 / Wednesday, August 14, 2013 / Notices
2.5 million shares through the use of
Flag Q;
• $0.0015 per share where the
Member executes greater than or equal
to an ADV of 12 million shares using the
ROUC routing strategy and yielding
Flags C, D, I, K, Q, X, BY, CR and MT;
and
• $0.0010 per share where the
Member posts greater than or equal to
0.30% of the TCV in ADV on EDGA and
routes 5 million shares through the use
of Flag Q.
The Exchange notes that no Member
has qualified for these tiers during the
previous three months, nor does the
Exchange anticipate a Member to
qualify for these tiers in the near future.
Therefore, the Exchange proposes to
remove these tiers from its Fee
Schedule. The Exchange also proposes
to remove references to Footnote 16
from the list of ‘‘Liquidity Flags.’’
Lastly, the Exchange notes that with the
deletion of these tiers, Members will
continue to be subject to the other fees
and tiers listed on the Exchange’s Fee
Schedule.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Non-Substantive Clarifying Changes
The Exchange also proposes to make
a number of clarifying, non-substantive
changes to its Fee Schedule to provide
greater transparency to Members on
how the Exchange assesses fees and
calculates rebates. The Exchange notes
that none of these changes substantively
amend any fee or rebate, nor alter the
manner in which it assesses fees or
calculates rebates. These proposed
changes are outlined below:
• Amend ‘‘EDGA Exchange’’ at the
top of the Fee Schedule to read ‘‘EDGA
Exchange, Inc.’’ and make a similar
change to the last sentence of the
‘‘EdgeBook AttributedSM Fees’’ section.
• Amend the sentence at the top of
the Fee Schedule from ‘‘Rebates &
Charges for Adding, Removing or
Routing Liquidity per Share for Tape A,
B, & C Securities’’ to ‘‘Rebates & Charges
for Adding, Removing or Routing
Liquidity per share for Tape A, B, & C
securities.
• Add language to the beginning of
the Fee Schedule to clarify that the rates
listed in the ‘‘Standard Rates’’ table
apply unless a Member is assigned a
liquidity flag other than a standard flag.
If a Member is assigned a liquidity flag
other than a standard flag, the rates
listed in the ‘‘Liquidity Flags’’ table will
apply.
• Title the first section of the Fee
Schedule as ‘‘Standard Rates’’ and the
second section ‘‘Liquidity Flags’’ by
deleting current text ‘‘Liquidity Flags
and Associated Fees.’’
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:16 Aug 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
• Add a row to the ‘‘Standard Rates’’
section of the Fee Schedule specifying
to which flags the standard rates apply.
These flags are B, V, Y, 3 and 4 for
adding liquidity, N, W, 6, BB, CR, PR
and XR for removing liquidity, and X for
routing and removing liquidity. The
Exchange notes that the flags listed in
this row are also listed as ‘‘Liquidity
Flags’’ indicating a rate equal to the
standard rate. The Exchange believes
adding a row indicating which flags
provide the standard rate would add
clarity to its Fee Schedule.
• Make grammatical changes to the
‘‘Liquidity Flags’’ section. These
proposed changes are the following: (i)
Replacing ‘‘Add’’ with ‘‘Adds’’ under
flags B, V, Y, 3 and 4; (ii) replacing
‘‘Remove’’ with ‘‘Removes’’ under flags
N, W, 6, BB and CR; (iii) replace
‘‘primary’’ with ‘‘listing’’ under Flag O;
(iv) delete ‘‘order’’ from Flag S as it is
repetitive; (v) replace ‘‘MPM’’ with
‘‘MidPoint Match’’ under Flag MT; (vi)
replace ‘‘Mid Point’’ with ‘‘Midpoint’’
under Flags PA and PX; (vii) add the
word ‘‘away’’ to Flag R to clarify that the
flag is referring to an away exchange
and not the Exchange; and (viii) remove
instances of ‘‘book’’ from footnotes B, N,
V, W, Y and BB.
• Add a section titled ‘‘Definitions,’’
which would consist of terms that are
currently defined within the footnotes
of the Fee Schedule. This section would
consist of definitions for ‘‘Added Flags,’’
‘‘Removal Flags,’’ ‘‘Routed Flags,’’
‘‘Average Daily Volume’’ and ‘‘Total
Consolidated Volume.’’ ‘‘Added Flags’’
would be defined as the following flags
that are counted towards tiers, where
applicable: B, V, Y, DM, HA, PA, RP, 3,
and 4. ‘‘Removal Flags’’ would be
defined as the following flags that are
counted towards tiers, where applicable:
BB, N, W, CR, DT, HR, PR, PT, XR and
6. ‘‘Routed Flags’’ would be defined as
the following flags that are counted
towards tiers, where applicable: A, C, D,
F, G, I, J, K, L, M, O, P, Q, R, S, T, U,
X, Z, 2, 7, 8, 9, 10, BY, CL, PX, RA, RB,
RC, RM, RR, RS, RT, RW, RX, RY, RZ,
and SW. ADV would be defined as the
average daily volume of shares that a
Member executed on the Exchange for
the month in which the fees are
calculated. TCV would be defined as the
volume reported by all exchanges and
trade reporting facilities to the
consolidated transaction reporting plans
for Tapes A, B and C securities for the
month in which the fees are calculated.
Where these terms appear in the
footnotes, such terms would be
abbreviated to match the ‘‘Definitions’’
section. The Exchange notes that these
terms were previously defined within
the footnotes. The Exchange does not
PO 00000
Frm 00146
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49589
propose any substantive changes to the
definitions; it is simply moving the
definitions from the footnotes and
consolidating them under the
‘‘Definitions’’ section.
• Add a section entitled ‘‘General
Notes’’ to help clarify the application of
the footnotes. First, the ‘‘General Notes’’
section would clarify that, to the extent
a Member: (i) does not qualify for any
of the tiers included in the footnotes,
the rates listed in the ‘‘Liquidity Flags’’
section will apply; or (ii) qualifies for
higher rebates and/or lower fees than
those provided by a tier for which such
Member qualifies, the higher rebates
and/or lower fees shall apply.10 Second,
the section will incorporate text
currently located in footnotes ‘‘a’’ and
‘‘b’’ that (i) trading activity on days
when the market closes early does not
count toward volume tiers and (ii) upon
a Member’s request, EDGA will
aggregate share volume calculations for
wholly owned affiliates on a prospective
basis. Lastly, the section will clarify that
variable rates provided by tiers apply
only to executions in securities priced at
or above $1.00.
• Add text to Footnote 2 to clarify
that both displayed and non-displayed
liquidity count towards the 8,000,000
share posting requirement to qualify for
the rates for flags HA and HR listed in
the ‘‘Liquidity Flags’’ table.
• Delete the language ‘‘Intentionally
omitted’’ from Footnote 3 and replace it
with the content from Footnote 17,
which would be provided in table
format. The Exchange does not propose
to alter the fees or rebates offered under
this tier or the requirements of the tier;
it simply seeks to reformat the tier as a
table to make it easier to read and
understand. The Exchange also
proposes to name the tier as the ‘‘RPMT
Tier.’’ Conforming changes are proposed
to be made to references to the footnotes
in the ‘‘Liquidity Flags’’ section.
• Convert the tiers in Footnote 4 into
table format and provide a name for
each tier. The Exchange does not
propose to alter the fees or rebates
offered under these tiers or the
requirements of the tiers; it simply seeks
to reformat the tiers as a table to make
them easier to read and understand. The
Exchange also proposes to name the
tiers under Footnote 4 as the ‘‘Add
Volume Tiers.’’ In addition, the
Exchange proposes to clarify that the fee
to add for meeting any of these tiers is
applicable to flags B, V, Y, 3 and 4.
10 These clarifications are similar to text included
in footnotes 2 and 4 of the EDGX Exchange, Inc. Fee
Schedule. See EDGX Exchange, Inc., Fee Schedule,
available at https://www.directedge.com/
Membership/FeeSchedule/EDGXFeeSchedule.aspx
(July 1, 2013).
E:\FR\FM\14AUN1.SGM
14AUN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
49590
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 157 / Wednesday, August 14, 2013 / Notices
• As discussed above, the Exchange
proposes to delete the content of
Footnote 6. In its place, the Exchange
proposes to move the text, unchanged,
from Footnote 15. Conforming changes
are proposed to be made to references to
the footnotes in the ‘‘Liquidity Flags’’
section.
• Delete the language ‘‘Intentionally
omitted’’ from Footnote 7 and replace it
with the exact content from Footnote 14.
Conforming changes are proposed to be
made to references to the footnotes in
the ‘‘Liquidity Flags’’ section.
• Amend footnotes 8, 9, 10, and 11 to
include similar language when stating
which flag would be yielded when an
order is routed using a particular
routing strategy or to a specific trading
center as contained in each footnote. In
addition, pricing information in the
footnotes would also be removed
because such information is redundant
and its removal would simplify the Fee
Schedule.
• Delete the language ‘‘Intentionally
omitted’’ from Footnote 12 and replace
it with the exact content from Footnote
13. Conforming changes are proposed to
be made to references to the footnotes in
the ‘‘Liquidity Flags’’ section.
• Delete footnotes 13—17 and ‘‘a’’—
‘‘c’’ as well as references to the footnotes
in the ‘‘Liquidity Flags’’ section.
• Delete Footnote ‘‘d’’ and rename it
as a new section entitled, ‘‘Late Fees.’’
The Exchange does not propose to
amend the text of Footnote ‘‘d,’’ which
will now be included under the new
‘‘Late Fees’’ section. References to
Footnote ‘‘d’’ would be removed from
the ‘‘Liquidity Flags’’ section.
• Amend the section ‘‘Port Fees’’ to
replace the word ‘‘Edge’’ with ‘‘EDGE’’
and add the word ‘‘Ports’’ after
‘‘EdgeRisk.’’
• Remove references to the effective
date of a rule filing where such filing
has become effective (i.e., Port Fees,
EdgeRisk Gateway, Physical
Connectivity Fees, Membership Fees,
EdgeBook Attributed Fees, Edge
Attribution Incentive Program and Edge
Routed Liquidity Report).
• Conform titles of products in the
sections following the footnotes to read
first as product name followed by
‘‘Fees’’ rather than ‘‘Pricing,’’ where
applicable. Furthermore, the titles of
columns would be amended to conform
to a common format.
• Insert and remove trademark
symbols where applicable throughout
the Fee Schedule (i.e., EDGA®, EDGX®,
EDGE XPRS®, EdgeRisk PortsSM,
EdgeRisk GatewaySM, EdgeBook
DepthSM, EdgeBook AttributedSM,
Edge Routed Liquidity ReportSM, and
EdgeBook Cloud®).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:16 Aug 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
Implementation Date
The Exchange proposes to implement
these amendments to its Fee Schedule
on August 5, 2013.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the objectives of Section 6 of the Act,11
in general, and furthers the objectives of
Section 6(b)(4),12 in particular, as it is
designed to provide for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees and
other charges among its Members and
other persons using its facilities. The
Exchange also believes the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) 13 requirements that the
rules of an exchange be designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with
respect to, and facilitating transactions
in securities, to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
Fee Change for Flag U
The Exchange believes that its
proposal to increase the pass through
charge for Members’ orders that yield
Flag U from $0.0029 to $0.0030 per
share represents an equitable allocation
of reasonable dues, fees, and other
charges among Members and other
persons using its facilities because the
Exchange does not levy additional fees
or offer additional rebates for orders that
it routes to LavaFlow through DE Route.
Prior to LavaFlow’s July 2013 fee
change, LavaFlow charged DE Route a
fee of $0.0029 per share for orders
yielding Flag U, which DE Route passed
through to the Exchange and the
Exchange passed through to its
Members. In July 2013, LavaFlow
increased the rate it charges its
customers, such as DE Route, from a
charge of $0.0029 per share to a charge
of $0.0030 per share for orders that are
routed to LavaFlow.14 Therefore, the
Exchange believes that the proposed
change in Flag U from a fee of $0.0029
per share to a fee of $0.0030 per share
is equitable and reasonable because it
accounts for the pricing changes on
11 15
U.S.C. 78f.
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
13 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
14 See LavaFlow Pricing, available at https://
www.lavatrading.com/solutions/pricing.php (July 1,
2013) (charging a fee of $0.0030 per share for
removing liquidity in shares priced at or above
$1.00).
12 15
PO 00000
Frm 00147
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
LavaFlow. In addition, the proposal
allows the Exchange to continue to
charge its Members a pass-through rate
for orders that are routed to LavaFlow
and remove liquidity using DE Route.
The Exchange notes that routing
through DE Route is voluntary. Lastly,
the Exchange also believes that the
proposed amendment is nondiscriminatory because it applies
uniformly to all Members.
Elimination of the Tier Under Footnote
6
The Exchange believes that its
proposal to eliminate the pricing tier
under Footnote 6 represents an
equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees, and other charges among Members
and other persons using its facilities
because the Exchange does not levy
additional fees or offer additional
rebates for orders that it routes to
LavaFlow through DE Route. Prior to
LavaFlow’s recent fee change, LavaFlow
charged DE Route a fee of $ 0.0023 per
share when volume criteria identical to
that contained in Footnote 6 were met.
DE Route, in turn, passed through this
rate to the Exchange and the Exchange
passed it through to its Members.
Recently, LavaFlow eliminated this
pricing tier from its fee schedule.15
Therefore, the Exchange believes that
removing the related pricing tier under
Footnote 6 is equitable and reasonable
because it accounts for the pricing
changes on LavaFlow. The Exchange
notes that routing through DE Route is
voluntary. The Exchange also believes
the elimination of unnecessary and
obsolete tiers simplifies its Fee
Schedule. Removal of the tiers under
Footnote 6 is also equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory because those
tiers would be eliminated and no longer
be available to any Member. Lastly, the
Exchange notes that with the deletion of
this tier, Members would continue to be
subject to the other fees and tiers listed
on the Exchange’s Fee Schedule.
Elimination of Tiers Under Footnote 16
The Exchange believes that the
proposal to eliminate the tiers under
Footnote 16 from its Fee Schedule is
reasonable because these tiers are
underutilized and have generally not
incentivized Members to add liquidity
to the Exchange. The Exchange notes
that no Member has qualified for these
tiers during the past three months, nor
does the Exchange anticipate a Member
to qualify for these tiers in the near
15 See LavaFlow Pricing, available at https://
www.lavatrading.com/solutions/pricing.php (July 1,
2013) (eliminating a fee of $0.0023 per share for
orders yielding Flag U where they post an average
of 100,000 shares or more per day).
E:\FR\FM\14AUN1.SGM
14AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 157 / Wednesday, August 14, 2013 / Notices
future. Therefore, the Exchange believes
eliminating the tiers under Footnote 16
would clarify its Fee Schedule. The
Exchange also believes the elimination
of unnecessary and obsolete tiers
simplifies its Fee Schedule. Removal of
the tiers under Footnote 16 is also
equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because those tiers
would be eliminated and no longer be
available to any Member. Lastly, the
Exchange notes that with the deletion of
these tiers, Members would continue to
be subject to the other fees and tiers
listed on the Exchange’s Fee Schedule.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Non-Substantive Clarifying Changes
The Exchange believes that the nonsubstantive clarifying changes to its Fee
Schedule are reasonable because they
are designed to provide greater
transparency to Members with regard to
how the Exchange assesses fees and
provides rebates. The Exchange notes
that none of the proposed nonsubstantive clarifying changes are
designed to amend any fee or rebate, nor
alter the manner in which it assesses
fees or calculates rebates. The Exchange
believes that Members would benefit
from clear guidance in its Fee Schedule
that describes the manner in which the
Exchange would assess fees and
calculate rebates. These nonsubstantive, technical changes to the
Fee Schedule as intended to make the
Fee Schedule clearer and less confusing
for investors and eliminate potential
investor confusion, thereby removing
impediments to and perfecting the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
general, protecting investors and the
public interest.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
These proposed rule changes do not
impose any burden on competition that
is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
The Exchange does not believe that any
of these changes represent a significant
departure from previous pricing offered
by the Exchange or pricing offered by
any of the Exchange’s competitors.
Additionally, Members may opt to
disfavor the Exchange’s pricing if they
believe that alternatives offer them
better value. Accordingly, the Exchange
believes that the proposed changes
would not impair the ability of Members
or competing venues to maintain their
competitive standing in the financial
markets.
Fee Change for Flag U
The Exchange believes that its
proposal to pass through a charge of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:16 Aug 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
$0.0030 per share for Members’ orders
that yield Flag U would increase
intermarket competition because it
offers customers an alternative means to
route to LavaFlow for the same price as
entering orders on LavaFlow directly.
The Exchange believes that its proposal
would not burden intramarket
competition because the proposed rate
would apply uniformly to all Members.
Elimination of the Tier Under Footnote
6
The Exchange believes that its
proposal to eliminate the pricing tier
under Footnote 6 would not impact
intermarket competition because the
change is in response to LavaFlow
removing an identical corresponding
tier from its fee schedule. The Exchange
believes that its proposal would not
burden intramarket competition because
the pricing tier would no longer be
available to any Members.
Elimination of Tiers Under Footnote 16
The Exchange believes that
elimination of the tiers under Footnote
16 would not affect intermarket nor
intramarket competition because the
tiers have generally not incentivized
Members to add liquidity to the
Exchange.
Non-Substantive Clarifying Changes
The Exchange believes that nonsubstantive, clarifying changes to the
Fee Schedule would not affect
intermarket nor intramarket competition
because none of these changes are
designed to amend any fee or rebate or
alter the manner in which the Exchange
assesses fees or calculates rebates. These
changes are intended to provide greater
transparency to Members with regard to
how the Exchange access fees and
provides rebates.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange has not solicited, and
does not intend to solicit, comments on
this proposed rule change. The
Exchange has not received any
unsolicited written comments from
Members or other interested parties.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act16 and Rule 19b–4(f)(2)17
thereunder. At any time within 60 days
16 15
17 17
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4 (f)(2).
Frm 00148
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49591
of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to
rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR–EDGA–2013–23 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–EDGA–2013–23. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
E:\FR\FM\14AUN1.SGM
14AUN1
49592
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 157 / Wednesday, August 14, 2013 / Notices
should refer to File Number SR–EDGA–
2013–23 and should be submitted on or
before September 4, 2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.18
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–19668 Filed 8–13–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
[Disaster Declaration # 13674 and # 13675]
Missouri Disaster Number MO–00066
U.S. Small Business
Administration.
ACTION: Amendment 1.
AGENCY:
U.S. Small Business Administration,
409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050,
Washington, DC 20416.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice
of the President’s major disaster
declaration for Private Non-Profit
organizations in the State of MISSOURI,
dated 07/18/2013, is hereby amended to
include the following areas as adversely
affected by the disaster.
Primary Counties: Scotland.
All other information in the original
declaration remains unchanged.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Numbers 59002 and 59008)
James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2013–19678 Filed 8–13–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
This is an amendment of the
Presidential declaration of a major
disaster for Public Assistance Only for
the State of Missouri (FEMA–4130–DR),
dated 07/18/2013.
Incident: Severe Storms, Straight-line
Winds, Tornadoes, and Flooding.
Incident Period: 05/29/2013 through
06/10/2013.
Effective Date: 08/05/2013.
Physical Loan Application Deadline
Date: 09/16/2013.
Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan
Application Deadline Date: 04/18/2014.
Addresses: Submit completed loan
applications to: U.S. Small Business
Administration, Processing and
Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A.
Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance,
SUMMARY:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Request and
Comment Request
The Social Security Administration
(SSA) publishes a list of information
collection packages requiring clearance
by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) in compliance with
Public Law 104–13, the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, effective October
1, 1995. This notice includes a new
information collection, and revisions of
OMB-approved information collections.
SSA is soliciting comments on the
accuracy of the agency’s burden
estimate; the need for the information;
its practical utility; ways to enhance its
quality, utility, and clarity; and ways to
Number of
respondents
Modality of completion
minimize burden on respondents,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology. Mail, email, or
fax your comments and
recommendations on the information
collection(s) to the OMB Desk Officer
and SSA Reports Clearance Officer at
the following addresses or fax numbers.
(OMB), Office of Management and
Budget, Attn: Desk Officer for SSA,
Fax: 202–395–6974, Email address:
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov.
(SSA), Social Security Administration,
DCRDP, Attn: Reports Clearance
Director, 107 Altmeyer Building, 6401
Security Blvd., Baltimore, MD 21235,
Fax: 410–966–2830, Email address:
OR.Reports.Clearance@ssa.gov
I. The information collections below
are pending at SSA. SSA will submit
them to OMB within 60 days from the
date of this notice. To be sure we
consider your comments, we must
receive them no later than October 15,
2013. Individuals can obtain copies of
the collection instruments by writing to
the above email address.
1. Request for Corrections of Earnings
Record—20 CFR 404.820 and 20 CFR
422.125—0960–0029. Individuals
alleging their earnings records in SSA’s
files are inaccurate use Form SSA–7008
to provide the information SSA needs to
check earnings posted, and as necessary,
initiate development to resolve any
inaccuracies. The respondents are
individuals who request correction of
earnings posted to their Social Security
earnings record.
Type of Request: Revision of an OMBapproved information collection.
Frequency of
response
Average
burden per
response
(minutes)
Estimated total
annual burden
(hours)
37,500
337,500
1
1
10
10
6,250
56,250
Totals ........................................................................................................
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Paper form .......................................................................................................
In-person or telephone interview .....................................................................
375,000
........................
........................
62,500
2. Protection and Advocacy for
Beneficiaries of Social Security
(PABSS)—20 CFR 435.51–435.52—
0960–0768. In March of 2013, Social
Security announced its intention to
award grants to reestablish communitybased protection and advocacy projects
in every State, U.S. Territories, and the
Hopi and Navajo tribal nations, as
authorized under Section 1150 of the
Social Security Act (Act). Awardees are
the 57 Protection & Advocacy (P&A)
18 17
organizations established under Title I
of the Developmental Disabilities
Assistance and Bill of Rights Act. The
PABSS projects are part of Social
Security’s strategy to increase the
number of Social Security Disability
Insurance (SSDI) or Supplemental
Security Income (SSI) recipients who
return to work and achieve financial
independence and self-sufficiency as
the result of receiving support,
representation, advocacy, or other
services. The overarching objective of
the PABSS program is to provide
information and advice about obtaining
vocational rehabilitation and
employment services, and to provide
advocacy or other services a beneficiary
with a disability may need to secure,
maintain, or regain gainful employment.
The PABSS Annual Program
Performance Report collects statistical
information from each of the PABSS
projects in an effort to manage and
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:16 Aug 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00149
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\14AUN1.SGM
14AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 157 (Wednesday, August 14, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49588-49592]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-19668]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-70144; File No. SR-EDGA-2013-23]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; EDGA Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to
Amendments to the EDGA Exchange, Inc. Fee Schedule
August 8, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on August 5, 2013, EDGA Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``EDGA'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II
and III below, which items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend its fees and rebates applicable to
Members \3\ pursuant to EDGA Rule 15.1(a) and (c) (``Fee Schedule'')
to: (1) Increase the fee charged from $0.0029 per share to $0.0030 per
share for orders that yield Flag U, which routes to LavaFlow, Inc.
(``LavaFlow''); (2) eliminate underutilized pricing tiers from its Fee
Schedule; and (3) make a number of non-substantive amendments and
clarifications. All of the changes described herein are applicable to
EDGA Members. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange's Internet Web site at www.directedge.com, at the Exchange's
principal office, and at the Public Reference Room of the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ ``Member'' is defined as ``any registered broker or dealer,
or any person associated with a registered broker or dealer, that
has been admitted to membership in the Exchange. A Member will have
the status of a ``member'' of the Exchange as that term is defined
in Section 3(a)(3) of the Act.'' EDGA Rule 1.5(n).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization
has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B and C below, of the
most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its Fee Schedule to: (1) Increase
the fee charged from $0.0029 per share to $0.0030 per share for orders
that yield Flag U, which routes to LavaFlow; (2) eliminate
underutilized pricing tiers from its Fee Schedule; and (3) make a
number of non-substantive amendments and clarifications.
Fee Change for Flag U
In securities priced at or above $1.00, the Exchange currently
assesses a fee of $0.0029 per share for Members' orders that yield Flag
U, which routes to LavaFlow. The Exchange proposes to amend its Fee
Schedule to increase this fee to $0.0030 per share for Members' orders
that yield Flag U. The proposed change represents a pass through of the
rate that Direct Edge ECN LLC (d/b/a DE Route) (``DE Route''), the
Exchange's affiliated routing broker-dealer, is charged for routing
orders to LavaFlow and do not qualify for a volume tiered discount.
When DE Route routes to LavaFlow, it is charged a default fee of
$0.0030 per share.\4\ DE Route will pass through this rate on LavaFlow
to the Exchange and the Exchange, in turn, will pass through this rate
to its Members. The Exchange notes that the proposed change is in
response to LavaFlow's July 2013 fee change where LavaFlow increased
the rate it charges its customers, such as DE Route, from a charge of
$0.0029 per share to a charge of $0.0030 per share for orders that are
routed to LavaFlow and add liquidity.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The Exchange notes that to the extent DE Route does or does
not achieve any volume tiered discount on LavaFlow, its rate for
Flag U will not change.
\5\ See LavaFlow Pricing, available at https://www.lavatrading.com/solutions/pricing.php (July 1, 2013) (charging a
fee of $0.0030 per share for removing liquidity in shares priced at
or above $1.00) (last visited July 19, 2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Elimination of the Tier Under Footnote 6 \6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ References herein to ``footnotes'' refer only to footnotes
on the Exchange's Fee Schedule and not to footnotes within the
current filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Currently, under Footnote 6, Members can qualify for a decreased
fee of $0.0023 per share for orders yielding Flag U where they post an
average of 100,000 shares or more per day using routing strategy ROLF
(yielding Flag M). The Exchange proposes to amend its Fee Schedule to
remove this pricing tier under Footnote 6. This pricing tier
represented a pass through of the rate that DE Route was charged for
routing orders to LavaFlow that qualify for an identical volume tiered
discount provided by LavaFlow. When DE Route routed to LavaFlow and
satisfied its tier, it was charged a reduced fee of $0.0023 per share.
DE Route passed through this rate on LavaFlow to the Exchange and the
Exchange, in turn, passed through this rate to its Members. The
Exchange notes that the proposed change is in response to LavaFlow's
recent fee change where LavaFlow eliminated its equivalent pricing tier
from its fee schedule.\7\ The Exchange also proposes to remove
references to Footnote 6 from Flag U in the list of ``Liquidity
Flags.'' Lastly, the Exchange notes that with the deletion of this
tier, Members will continue to be subject to the other fees and tiers
listed on the Exchange's Fee Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See LavaFlow Pricing, available at https://www.lavatrading.com/solutions/pricing.php (July 1, 2013) (no longer
charging a fee of $0.0023 per share for members that post an average
of 100,000 shares or more per day) (last visited July 19, 2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Elimination of Tiers Under Footnote 16
The Exchange proposes to eliminate the pricing tiers included under
Footnote 16 because they are underutilized by Members. Currently, the
Exchange offers the following pricing tiers for Flag Q under Footnote
16:
$0.0015 per share where the Member posts greater than or
equal to 0.30% of the total consolidated volume (``TCV'') \8\ in
average daily volume (``ADV'') \9\ on the Exchange and routes
[[Page 49589]]
2.5 million shares through the use of Flag Q;
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ TCV is defined as the volume reported by all exchanges and
the trade reporting facilities to the consolidated transaction
reporting plans for Tapes A, B, and C securities for the month in
which fees are calculated.
\9\ ADV is defined as the average daily trading volume of shares
that a Member executed on the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
$0.0015 per share where the Member executes greater than
or equal to an ADV of 12 million shares using the ROUC routing strategy
and yielding Flags C, D, I, K, Q, X, BY, CR and MT; and
$0.0010 per share where the Member posts greater than or
equal to 0.30% of the TCV in ADV on EDGA and routes 5 million shares
through the use of Flag Q.
The Exchange notes that no Member has qualified for these tiers
during the previous three months, nor does the Exchange anticipate a
Member to qualify for these tiers in the near future. Therefore, the
Exchange proposes to remove these tiers from its Fee Schedule. The
Exchange also proposes to remove references to Footnote 16 from the
list of ``Liquidity Flags.'' Lastly, the Exchange notes that with the
deletion of these tiers, Members will continue to be subject to the
other fees and tiers listed on the Exchange's Fee Schedule.
Non-Substantive Clarifying Changes
The Exchange also proposes to make a number of clarifying, non-
substantive changes to its Fee Schedule to provide greater transparency
to Members on how the Exchange assesses fees and calculates rebates.
The Exchange notes that none of these changes substantively amend any
fee or rebate, nor alter the manner in which it assesses fees or
calculates rebates. These proposed changes are outlined below:
Amend ``EDGA Exchange'' at the top of the Fee Schedule to
read ``EDGA Exchange, Inc.'' and make a similar change to the last
sentence of the ``EdgeBook AttributedSM Fees'' section.
Amend the sentence at the top of the Fee Schedule from
``Rebates & Charges for Adding, Removing or Routing Liquidity per Share
for Tape A, B, & C Securities'' to ``Rebates & Charges for Adding,
Removing or Routing Liquidity per share for Tape A, B, & C securities.
Add language to the beginning of the Fee Schedule to
clarify that the rates listed in the ``Standard Rates'' table apply
unless a Member is assigned a liquidity flag other than a standard
flag. If a Member is assigned a liquidity flag other than a standard
flag, the rates listed in the ``Liquidity Flags'' table will apply.
Title the first section of the Fee Schedule as ``Standard
Rates'' and the second section ``Liquidity Flags'' by deleting current
text ``Liquidity Flags and Associated Fees.''
Add a row to the ``Standard Rates'' section of the Fee
Schedule specifying to which flags the standard rates apply. These
flags are B, V, Y, 3 and 4 for adding liquidity, N, W, 6, BB, CR, PR
and XR for removing liquidity, and X for routing and removing
liquidity. The Exchange notes that the flags listed in this row are
also listed as ``Liquidity Flags'' indicating a rate equal to the
standard rate. The Exchange believes adding a row indicating which
flags provide the standard rate would add clarity to its Fee Schedule.
Make grammatical changes to the ``Liquidity Flags''
section. These proposed changes are the following: (i) Replacing
``Add'' with ``Adds'' under flags B, V, Y, 3 and 4; (ii) replacing
``Remove'' with ``Removes'' under flags N, W, 6, BB and CR; (iii)
replace ``primary'' with ``listing'' under Flag O; (iv) delete
``order'' from Flag S as it is repetitive; (v) replace ``MPM'' with
``MidPoint Match'' under Flag MT; (vi) replace ``Mid Point'' with
``Midpoint'' under Flags PA and PX; (vii) add the word ``away'' to Flag
R to clarify that the flag is referring to an away exchange and not the
Exchange; and (viii) remove instances of ``book'' from footnotes B, N,
V, W, Y and BB.
Add a section titled ``Definitions,'' which would consist
of terms that are currently defined within the footnotes of the Fee
Schedule. This section would consist of definitions for ``Added
Flags,'' ``Removal Flags,'' ``Routed Flags,'' ``Average Daily Volume''
and ``Total Consolidated Volume.'' ``Added Flags'' would be defined as
the following flags that are counted towards tiers, where applicable:
B, V, Y, DM, HA, PA, RP, 3, and 4. ``Removal Flags'' would be defined
as the following flags that are counted towards tiers, where
applicable: BB, N, W, CR, DT, HR, PR, PT, XR and 6. ``Routed Flags''
would be defined as the following flags that are counted towards tiers,
where applicable: A, C, D, F, G, I, J, K, L, M, O, P, Q, R, S, T, U, X,
Z, 2, 7, 8, 9, 10, BY, CL, PX, RA, RB, RC, RM, RR, RS, RT, RW, RX, RY,
RZ, and SW. ADV would be defined as the average daily volume of shares
that a Member executed on the Exchange for the month in which the fees
are calculated. TCV would be defined as the volume reported by all
exchanges and trade reporting facilities to the consolidated
transaction reporting plans for Tapes A, B and C securities for the
month in which the fees are calculated. Where these terms appear in the
footnotes, such terms would be abbreviated to match the ``Definitions''
section. The Exchange notes that these terms were previously defined
within the footnotes. The Exchange does not propose any substantive
changes to the definitions; it is simply moving the definitions from
the footnotes and consolidating them under the ``Definitions'' section.
Add a section entitled ``General Notes'' to help clarify
the application of the footnotes. First, the ``General Notes'' section
would clarify that, to the extent a Member: (i) does not qualify for
any of the tiers included in the footnotes, the rates listed in the
``Liquidity Flags'' section will apply; or (ii) qualifies for higher
rebates and/or lower fees than those provided by a tier for which such
Member qualifies, the higher rebates and/or lower fees shall apply.\10\
Second, the section will incorporate text currently located in
footnotes ``a'' and ``b'' that (i) trading activity on days when the
market closes early does not count toward volume tiers and (ii) upon a
Member's request, EDGA will aggregate share volume calculations for
wholly owned affiliates on a prospective basis. Lastly, the section
will clarify that variable rates provided by tiers apply only to
executions in securities priced at or above $1.00.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ These clarifications are similar to text included in
footnotes 2 and 4 of the EDGX Exchange, Inc. Fee Schedule. See EDGX
Exchange, Inc., Fee Schedule, available at https://www.directedge.com/Membership/FeeSchedule/EDGXFeeSchedule.aspx (July
1, 2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Add text to Footnote 2 to clarify that both displayed and
non-displayed liquidity count towards the 8,000,000 share posting
requirement to qualify for the rates for flags HA and HR listed in the
``Liquidity Flags'' table.
Delete the language ``Intentionally omitted'' from
Footnote 3 and replace it with the content from Footnote 17, which
would be provided in table format. The Exchange does not propose to
alter the fees or rebates offered under this tier or the requirements
of the tier; it simply seeks to reformat the tier as a table to make it
easier to read and understand. The Exchange also proposes to name the
tier as the ``RPMT Tier.'' Conforming changes are proposed to be made
to references to the footnotes in the ``Liquidity Flags'' section.
Convert the tiers in Footnote 4 into table format and
provide a name for each tier. The Exchange does not propose to alter
the fees or rebates offered under these tiers or the requirements of
the tiers; it simply seeks to reformat the tiers as a table to make
them easier to read and understand. The Exchange also proposes to name
the tiers under Footnote 4 as the ``Add Volume Tiers.'' In addition,
the Exchange proposes to clarify that the fee to add for meeting any of
these tiers is applicable to flags B, V, Y, 3 and 4.
[[Page 49590]]
As discussed above, the Exchange proposes to delete the
content of Footnote 6. In its place, the Exchange proposes to move the
text, unchanged, from Footnote 15. Conforming changes are proposed to
be made to references to the footnotes in the ``Liquidity Flags''
section.
Delete the language ``Intentionally omitted'' from
Footnote 7 and replace it with the exact content from Footnote 14.
Conforming changes are proposed to be made to references to the
footnotes in the ``Liquidity Flags'' section.
Amend footnotes 8, 9, 10, and 11 to include similar
language when stating which flag would be yielded when an order is
routed using a particular routing strategy or to a specific trading
center as contained in each footnote. In addition, pricing information
in the footnotes would also be removed because such information is
redundant and its removal would simplify the Fee Schedule.
Delete the language ``Intentionally omitted'' from
Footnote 12 and replace it with the exact content from Footnote 13.
Conforming changes are proposed to be made to references to the
footnotes in the ``Liquidity Flags'' section.
Delete footnotes 13--17 and ``a''--``c'' as well as
references to the footnotes in the ``Liquidity Flags'' section.
Delete Footnote ``d'' and rename it as a new section
entitled, ``Late Fees.'' The Exchange does not propose to amend the
text of Footnote ``d,'' which will now be included under the new ``Late
Fees'' section. References to Footnote ``d'' would be removed from the
``Liquidity Flags'' section.
Amend the section ``Port Fees'' to replace the word
``Edge'' with ``EDGE'' and add the word ``Ports'' after ``EdgeRisk.''
Remove references to the effective date of a rule filing
where such filing has become effective (i.e., Port Fees, EdgeRisk
Gateway, Physical Connectivity Fees, Membership Fees, EdgeBook
Attributed Fees, Edge Attribution Incentive Program and Edge Routed
Liquidity Report).
Conform titles of products in the sections following the
footnotes to read first as product name followed by ``Fees'' rather
than ``Pricing,'' where applicable. Furthermore, the titles of columns
would be amended to conform to a common format.
Insert and remove trademark symbols where applicable
throughout the Fee Schedule (i.e., EDGA[supreg], EDGX[supreg], EDGE
XPRS[supreg], EdgeRisk PortsSM, EdgeRisk GatewaySM, EdgeBook DepthSM,
EdgeBook AttributedSM, Edge Routed Liquidity ReportSM, and EdgeBook
Cloud[supreg]).
Implementation Date
The Exchange proposes to implement these amendments to its Fee
Schedule on August 5, 2013.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the objectives of Section 6 of the Act,\11\ in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4),\12\ in particular, as it is
designed to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees and other charges among its Members and other persons using its
facilities. The Exchange also believes the proposed rule change is
consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \13\ requirements that the rules of
an exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating,
clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee Change for Flag U
The Exchange believes that its proposal to increase the pass
through charge for Members' orders that yield Flag U from $0.0029 to
$0.0030 per share represents an equitable allocation of reasonable
dues, fees, and other charges among Members and other persons using its
facilities because the Exchange does not levy additional fees or offer
additional rebates for orders that it routes to LavaFlow through DE
Route. Prior to LavaFlow's July 2013 fee change, LavaFlow charged DE
Route a fee of $0.0029 per share for orders yielding Flag U, which DE
Route passed through to the Exchange and the Exchange passed through to
its Members. In July 2013, LavaFlow increased the rate it charges its
customers, such as DE Route, from a charge of $0.0029 per share to a
charge of $0.0030 per share for orders that are routed to LavaFlow.\14\
Therefore, the Exchange believes that the proposed change in Flag U
from a fee of $0.0029 per share to a fee of $0.0030 per share is
equitable and reasonable because it accounts for the pricing changes on
LavaFlow. In addition, the proposal allows the Exchange to continue to
charge its Members a pass-through rate for orders that are routed to
LavaFlow and remove liquidity using DE Route. The Exchange notes that
routing through DE Route is voluntary. Lastly, the Exchange also
believes that the proposed amendment is non-discriminatory because it
applies uniformly to all Members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See LavaFlow Pricing, available at https://www.lavatrading.com/solutions/pricing.php (July 1, 2013) (charging a
fee of $0.0030 per share for removing liquidity in shares priced at
or above $1.00).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Elimination of the Tier Under Footnote 6
The Exchange believes that its proposal to eliminate the pricing
tier under Footnote 6 represents an equitable allocation of reasonable
dues, fees, and other charges among Members and other persons using its
facilities because the Exchange does not levy additional fees or offer
additional rebates for orders that it routes to LavaFlow through DE
Route. Prior to LavaFlow's recent fee change, LavaFlow charged DE Route
a fee of $ 0.0023 per share when volume criteria identical to that
contained in Footnote 6 were met. DE Route, in turn, passed through
this rate to the Exchange and the Exchange passed it through to its
Members. Recently, LavaFlow eliminated this pricing tier from its fee
schedule.\15\ Therefore, the Exchange believes that removing the
related pricing tier under Footnote 6 is equitable and reasonable
because it accounts for the pricing changes on LavaFlow. The Exchange
notes that routing through DE Route is voluntary. The Exchange also
believes the elimination of unnecessary and obsolete tiers simplifies
its Fee Schedule. Removal of the tiers under Footnote 6 is also
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because those tiers would be
eliminated and no longer be available to any Member. Lastly, the
Exchange notes that with the deletion of this tier, Members would
continue to be subject to the other fees and tiers listed on the
Exchange's Fee Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See LavaFlow Pricing, available at https://www.lavatrading.com/solutions/pricing.php (July 1, 2013)
(eliminating a fee of $0.0023 per share for orders yielding Flag U
where they post an average of 100,000 shares or more per day).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Elimination of Tiers Under Footnote 16
The Exchange believes that the proposal to eliminate the tiers
under Footnote 16 from its Fee Schedule is reasonable because these
tiers are underutilized and have generally not incentivized Members to
add liquidity to the Exchange. The Exchange notes that no Member has
qualified for these tiers during the past three months, nor does the
Exchange anticipate a Member to qualify for these tiers in the near
[[Page 49591]]
future. Therefore, the Exchange believes eliminating the tiers under
Footnote 16 would clarify its Fee Schedule. The Exchange also believes
the elimination of unnecessary and obsolete tiers simplifies its Fee
Schedule. Removal of the tiers under Footnote 16 is also equitable and
not unfairly discriminatory because those tiers would be eliminated and
no longer be available to any Member. Lastly, the Exchange notes that
with the deletion of these tiers, Members would continue to be subject
to the other fees and tiers listed on the Exchange's Fee Schedule.
Non-Substantive Clarifying Changes
The Exchange believes that the non-substantive clarifying changes
to its Fee Schedule are reasonable because they are designed to provide
greater transparency to Members with regard to how the Exchange
assesses fees and provides rebates. The Exchange notes that none of the
proposed non-substantive clarifying changes are designed to amend any
fee or rebate, nor alter the manner in which it assesses fees or
calculates rebates. The Exchange believes that Members would benefit
from clear guidance in its Fee Schedule that describes the manner in
which the Exchange would assess fees and calculate rebates. These non-
substantive, technical changes to the Fee Schedule as intended to make
the Fee Schedule clearer and less confusing for investors and eliminate
potential investor confusion, thereby removing impediments to and
perfecting the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system, and, in general, protecting investors and the public
interest.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
These proposed rule changes do not impose any burden on competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act. The Exchange does not believe that any of these changes
represent a significant departure from previous pricing offered by the
Exchange or pricing offered by any of the Exchange's competitors.
Additionally, Members may opt to disfavor the Exchange's pricing if
they believe that alternatives offer them better value. Accordingly,
the Exchange believes that the proposed changes would not impair the
ability of Members or competing venues to maintain their competitive
standing in the financial markets.
Fee Change for Flag U
The Exchange believes that its proposal to pass through a charge of
$0.0030 per share for Members' orders that yield Flag U would increase
intermarket competition because it offers customers an alternative
means to route to LavaFlow for the same price as entering orders on
LavaFlow directly. The Exchange believes that its proposal would not
burden intramarket competition because the proposed rate would apply
uniformly to all Members.
Elimination of the Tier Under Footnote 6
The Exchange believes that its proposal to eliminate the pricing
tier under Footnote 6 would not impact intermarket competition because
the change is in response to LavaFlow removing an identical
corresponding tier from its fee schedule. The Exchange believes that
its proposal would not burden intramarket competition because the
pricing tier would no longer be available to any Members.
Elimination of Tiers Under Footnote 16
The Exchange believes that elimination of the tiers under Footnote
16 would not affect intermarket nor intramarket competition because the
tiers have generally not incentivized Members to add liquidity to the
Exchange.
Non-Substantive Clarifying Changes
The Exchange believes that non-substantive, clarifying changes to
the Fee Schedule would not affect intermarket nor intramarket
competition because none of these changes are designed to amend any fee
or rebate or alter the manner in which the Exchange assesses fees or
calculates rebates. These changes are intended to provide greater
transparency to Members with regard to how the Exchange access fees and
provides rebates.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit,
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received
any unsolicited written comments from Members or other interested
parties.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act\16\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2)\17\ thereunder. At any
time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\17\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4 (f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please
include File Number SR-EDGA-2013-23 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-EDGA-2013-23. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions
[[Page 49592]]
should refer to File Number SR-EDGA-2013-23 and should be submitted on
or before September 4, 2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\18\
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2013-19668 Filed 8-13-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P