Self-Regulatory Organizations; C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Relating to the Technical Disconnect Functionality, 48738-48741 [2013-19258]
Download as PDF
48738
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 154 / Friday, August 9, 2013 / Notices
market participants in managing their
orders in the event of symbol changes
and changes in listing venue, by
cancelling open orders and thereby
alerting members to the need to evaluate
whether to reenter the cancelled order.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
Phlx does not believe that the
proposed rule change will result in any
burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act, as amended.
Specifically, by offering market
participants additional options with
regard to management of open orders,
the change has the potential to enhance
Phlx’s competitiveness with respect to
other trading venues, thereby promoting
greater competition. Moreover, the
change does not burden competition in
that it does not restrict the ability of
members to enter and update trading
interest in PSX.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule
change does not: (i) Significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) become
operative for 30 days from the date on
which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate, it has
become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 14 and Rule 19b–
4(f)(6) thereunder.15
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is: (i) Necessary or appropriate in
the public interest; (ii) for the protection
of investors; or (iii) otherwise in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
14 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6) requires a self-regulatory organization to give
the Commission written notice of its intent to file
the proposed rule change at least five business days
prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this
requirement.
15 17
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:54 Aug 08, 2013
Jkt 229001
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–Phlx–2013–77 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Phlx–2013–77. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–Phlx–
2013–77 and should be submitted on or
before August 30, 2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.16
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–19256 Filed 8–8–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
16 17
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–70112; File No. SR–C2–
2013–029]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; C2
Options Exchange, Incorporated;
Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule
Change Relating to the Technical
Disconnect Functionality
August 5, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that, on July 29,
2013, C2 Options Exchange,
Incorporated (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘C2’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange.
The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested
persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is proposing to amend
its rules to codify the Technical
Disconnect Mechanism. The text of the
proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange’s Web site (https://
www.c2exchange.com/Legal/), at the
Exchange’s Office of the Secretary, and
at the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4. The Commission notes that
the Exchange filed the proposed rule change
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act (15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii)) and Rule 19b–4(f)(5)
thereunder (17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(5)), which renders
the proposal effective upon filing with the
Commission.
2 17
E:\FR\FM\09AUN1.SGM
09AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 154 / Friday, August 9, 2013 / Notices
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange is proposing to amend
C2 Rules to codify a Technical
Disconnect functionality which is
designed to assist C2 Permit Holders
(‘‘Permit Holders’’) in the event that
they lose communication with a CBOE
Application Server (‘‘CAS’’) due to a
loss of connectivity between their
designated C2 Client Application and a
CAS.
By way of background, C2 Permit
Holders currently enter quotes and
orders into a CAS via Client
Applications. For purposes of this
discussion, a ‘‘Client Application’’ is the
system component, such as a Permit
Holder’s custom trading application,
through which a Permit Holder
communicates its quotes and/or orders
to a CAS,3 which sits between the Client
Application and CBOE Command.
Messages are passed between a Client
Application and a CAS. The quotes a
Market-Maker enters on the Exchange
may be sent by a Market-Maker from
one or more Client Applications.
Similarly, the orders a Permit Holder
enters on the Exchange may be sent by
the Permit Holders from one or more
Client Applications. When a CAS loses
communication with a Client
Application such that the CAS does not
receive an appropriate response to a
Heartbeat Request within ‘‘x’’ period of
time (‘‘Heartbeat Response Time’’), the
Technical Disconnect Mechanism will
automatically logoff the Permit Holder’s
affected Client Application and, if
applicable, will automatically cancel
any Market-Maker quotes posted
through the affected Client Application.
For purposes of this rule, a ‘‘Heartbeat
Request’’ refers to a message from a CAS
to a Client Application to check
connectivity and which requires a
response from the Client Application in
order to avoid logoff. The Heartbeat
Request acts as a virtual pulse between
a CAS and a Client Application and
allows a CAS to continually monitor its
connection with a Client Application.
Failure to receive a response to a
Heartbeat Request within the Heartbeat
Response Time is indicative of a
technical or system issue. This function
of automatically logging off a Client
Application, and if applicable
automatically cancelling Market-Maker
quotes posted through the affected
Client Application, when there is no
3 C2 currently has numerous CASs serving Permit
Holders.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:54 Aug 08, 2013
Jkt 229001
response to a Heartbeat Request within
the Heartbeat Response Time is
intended to help to mitigate the
potential risks associated with a loss of
communication with a Client
Application (e.g., erroneous or
unintended executions due to stale
quotes that remained in the C2 Book).
This serves to assist a Permit Holder
when such a technical or system issue
occurs, and also assist the Exchange in
maintaining a fair and orderly market
generally.
A CAS will generate a Heartbeat
Request to a Client Application after a
specified interval (‘‘Heartbeat Interval’’
or ‘‘ ‘n’ period of time’’). Additionally as
noted above, a CAS will disconnect a
Client Application, and if applicable
cancel any Market-Maker quotes posted
through the affect Client Application,
after a specified period of time if it does
not receive an appropriate response to a
Heartbeat Request (Heartbeat Response
Time or ‘‘ ‘x’ period of time’’). The
Exchange notes that the Heartbeat
Interval and the Heartbeat Response
Time depend upon the Application
Programming Interface (‘‘API’’) a Permit
Holder is using.4 Currently, the
Exchange offers two APIs: CBOE Market
Interface (‘‘CMi’’) API and Financial
Information eXchange (‘‘FIX’’) Protocol.
CMi currently has only one version
available: CMi 2. A Permit Holder may
determine which of the available APIs,
and if applicable, which version, it
would like to use.
First, a CAS on the CMi 2 API will
generate a Heartbeat Request to a Client
Application (i) after the CAS does not
receive any messages from a particular
Client Application for ‘‘n’’ period of
time or (ii) after every ‘‘n’’ period of
time. A Permit Holder using CMi 2 will
determine whether Heartbeat Requests
are generated every ‘‘n’’ period of time
or only if no messages are received for
‘‘n’’ period of time. A Permit Holder
using the CMi 2 API will also determine
the value of ‘‘n’’ at logon. In no event
shall ‘‘n’’ be less than three (3) seconds
or exceed twenty (20) seconds. If a CAS
generates a Heartbeat Request only after
it does not receive any messages from a
particular Client Application for ‘‘n’’
period of time, the value of ‘‘x’’
(Heartbeat Response Time) will be set at
a half (.5) second. If a CAS generates a
Heartbeat Request every ‘‘n’’ period of
time, the value of ‘‘x’’ shall be equal to
the value of ‘‘n.’’ For example, if a
Permit Holder using CMi 2 chooses to
receive a Heartbeat Request every ‘‘n’’
4 An API is a computer interface that allows
market participants with authorized access to
interface electronically with the Exchange. Multiple
versions of each API may exist and other APIs may
be supported from time-to-time.
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
48739
period of time and sets the value of ‘‘n’’
to 6 seconds, then the Permit Holder’s
Client Application must respond to a
Heartbeat Request within 6 seconds or
the Client Application will be
disconnected.
A CAS on the FIX API will generate
a Heartbeat Message to a Client
Application after the CAS does not
receive any messages from a particular
Client Application for ‘‘n’’ period of
time. If the CAS does not receive a
response to the ‘‘Heartbeat Message’’
from the Client Application for ‘‘n’’
period of time, the CAS shall generate
a Heartbeat Request to the Client
Application. For purposes of this rule,
a ‘‘Heartbeat Message’’ refers to a
message from a CAS to a Client
Application to check connectivity.
Failure to respond to a Heartbeat
Message within ‘‘n’’ period of time will
trigger the generation of a Heartbeat
Request. A Permit Holder using the FIX
API will determine the value of ‘‘n’’ at
logon. In no event shall ‘‘n’’ be less than
five (5) seconds. The value of ‘‘x’’
(Heartbeat Response Time) will be set
equal to the value of ‘‘n.’’ For example,
if a Permit Holder using FIX sets the
value of ‘‘n’’ to 6 seconds, then the
Permit Holder’s Client Application must
respond to a Heartbeat Request within 6
seconds or the Client Application will
be disconnected.
The following example illustrates the
manner in which the Technical
Disconnect Mechanism functions on
CMi 2 when a Permit Holder chooses to
have the CAS generate a Heartbeat
Request every ‘‘n’’ period of time. For
purposes of this example only, the
Permit Holder will be a non-MarketMaker and ‘‘n’’ will be set by the Permit
Holder at 5 seconds:
(1) 10:00:000—Heartbeat Request sent to
Client Application after logon
10:00:020—CAS receives a message
from Client Application
10:00:050—Heartbeat Request sent to
Client Application
10:00:100—No response to Heartbeat
Request received by CAS within 5
seconds
— Client Application automatically
logged off and pending orders
previously entered from the Client
Application remain in the System
The following examples illustrate the
manner in which the Technical
Disconnect Mechanism functions on
CMi 2 when a Permit Holder chooses to
have the CAS generate a Heartbeat
Request only when the CAS does not
receive any messages from the Client
Application for ‘‘n’’ period of time. For
purposes of these examples only, the
Permit Holder will be a Market-Maker
E:\FR\FM\09AUN1.SGM
09AUN1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
48740
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 154 / Friday, August 9, 2013 / Notices
and ‘‘n’’ will be set by the Permit Holder
at 5 seconds:
(1) 10:00:000—Heartbeat Request sent to
Client Application after logon
10:00:020—CAS receives a message
from Client Application
—Counter re-starts
10:00:070—No messages received
from Client Application within 5
seconds
—CAS generates Heartbeat Request
10:00:073—CAS receives a message
from Client Application
— Counter restarts
(2) 10:00:000—Heartbeat Request sent to
Client Application within login
10:00:020—CAS receives a message
from Client Application
—Counter re-starts
10:00:070—No messages received
from Client Application within 5
seconds
—CAS generates Heartbeat Request
10:00:075—No messages received
from Client Application within a .5
second
—Client Application automatically
logged off and pending MarketMaker quotes previously entered
from the Client Application
automatically canceled
Lastly, the following example
illustrates the manner in which the
Technical Disconnect Mechanism
functions on FIX. For purposes of this
example only, the Permit Holder will be
a Market-Maker and ‘‘n’’ will be set by
the Permit Holder at 5 seconds:
(1) 10:00:000—Heartbeat Request sent to
Client Application after logon
10:00:020—CAS receives a message
from Client Application
—Counter restarts
10:00:070—No messages received
from Client Application within 5
seconds
—CAS generates Heartbeat Message
10:00:120—No messages received
from Client Application within 5
seconds
—CAS generates Heartbeat Request
10:00:170—No messages received
from Client Application within 5
seconds
—Client Application automatically
logged off and pending MarketMaker quotes previously entered
from the Client Application
automatically canceled
As demonstrated above, a Heartbeat
Request may be generated (i) every ‘‘n’’
period of time or (ii) when the CAS does
not receive any messages from a Client
Application for a specified period of
time (‘‘n’’ period of time) depending
upon the API being used. Regardless of
the API being used however, if an
appropriate response message to a
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:54 Aug 08, 2013
Jkt 229001
Heartbeat Request is not received by the
CAS from the Client Application within
a specified period of time (‘‘x’’ period of
time or Heartbeat Response Time), the
Technical Disconnect Mechanism is
triggered and the Client Application is
automatically logged off and, if
applicable, a Market-Maker’s quotes
through that Client Application are
automatically canceled.
The Exchange notes that any nonconnectivity is event- and Client
Application-specific. Therefore, the
cancellation of a Market-Maker’s quotes
entered into a CAS via a particular
Client Application will neither impact
nor determine the treatment of the
quotes of the same or other MarketMakers entered into a CAS via a
separate and distinct Client Application.
The Technical Disconnect Mechanism
will not impact or determine the
treatment of orders previously entered
into a CAS. As discussed above, the
function of automatically cancelling a
Market-Maker’s quotes posted through
an affected Client Application is
intended to help to mitigate the
potential risks associated with a loss of
communication with a Client
Application. For example, in today’s
market, Market-Makers’ quotes are
rapidly changing and can have a
lifespan of only milliseconds.
Additionally, under the System, trades
are automatically affected against the
Market-Maker’s then current quote.
Therefore, if a Permit Holder’s Client
Application is disconnected for any
period of time, it is very possible that
any quotes posted through that Client
Application would be stale by the time
the Permit Holder reestablished
connectivity. Consequently, any
resulting execution of such quotes is
more likely to be erroneous or
unintended. Conversely, the Exchange
notes that orders tend to be static in
nature and often rest in the book.
Indeed, certain order types, such as
Market-on-Close orders, are intended to
rest in the book for a period of time. As
such, there is a lower risk of erroneous
or unintended executions resulting from
orders that remained in the System
during and after an affected Client
Application was logged off.
The Exchange next notes that the CAS
will send a logout message to an
affected Client Application that
confirms that the Client Application
connection has been terminated. Once
connectivity to the Client Application is
reestablished, a Market-Maker affected
by the mechanism is able to send
messages to the CAS to reestablish the
Market-Maker’s quotes. Any MarketMaker affected by the Technical
Disconnect Mechanism is not relieved
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
of its obligation to provide continuous
electronic quotes in accordance with the
Exchange rules.5 The Exchange finally
notes that the Technical Disconnect
Mechanism is enabled for all Permit
Holders and may not be disabled by
Permit Holders.
The Exchange believes that while
information relating to connectivity and
the Technical Disconnect Mechanism
are already available to Permit Holders
via technical specifications, codifying
this information within the rule text
will provide additional transparency
and further reduce potential confusion.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to the Exchange
and, in particular, the requirements of
Section 6(b) of the Act.6 Specifically,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Section
6(b)(5) 7 requirements that the rules of
an exchange be designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged
in regulating, clearing, settling,
processing information with respect to,
and facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
Additionally, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the Section 6(b)(5) 8 requirement that
the rules of an exchange not be designed
to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
In particular, the Exchange believes that
codifying in the rules how the Technical
Disconnect Mechanism works provides
additional transparency in the rules and
provides an additional avenue to easily
understand C2’s system and processes.
The Exchange believes this will also
reduce any potential confusion, thereby
removing a potential impediment to and
perfecting the mechanism for a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, protecting
investors and the public interest.
Additionally, the Technical Disconnect
Mechanism is a valuable tool that is
designed to help maintain a fair and
orderly market. The Exchange believes
that the Technical Disconnect
5 See
C2 Rule 8.5, C2 Rule 8.13 and C2 Rule 8.17.
U.S.C. 78f(b).
7 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
8 Id.
6 15
E:\FR\FM\09AUN1.SGM
09AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 154 / Friday, August 9, 2013 / Notices
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Mechanism assists with the
maintenance of fair and orderly markets
by helping to mitigate the potential risks
associated with a loss in communication
with a Client Application, especially
risk associated with a loss in
communication with a Client
Application of Market-Maker that is
providing quotes across a multitude of
series and classes. The Exchange also
believes that the proposed rule change
is designed to not permit unfair
discrimination among market
participants. The Exchange notes that
the Technical Disconnect Mechanism
automatic logoff function is applicable
to all Permit Holders and may not be
disabled by any Permit Holder. The
Exchange believes that the Technical
Disconnect Mechanism benefits the
marketplace because it is designed to
help alert a Permit Holder to a potential
technical or system issue and
automatically logoff a Permit Holder’s
Client Application within certain
prescribed parameters. With respect to
the Technical Disconnect Mechanism’s
automatic cancellation of Market-Maker
quotes, the Exchange also believes it is
not unfair to cancel only Market-Maker
quotes and not orders. Particularly, the
automatic cancellation of Market-Maker
quotes benefits the marketplace because
it is designed to help reduce the risk of
stale quotes remaining on the C2 Book
in the event that a CAS loses
connectivity with a Client Application
(e.g., potentially resulting in erroneous
or unintended executions).
Furthermore, the functionality provides
for the protection of Market-Makers,
who must bear the burden of market risk
for stale quotes well as for the
protection of investors and the
efficiency and fairness of the markets as
a whole. Conversely, because orders
tend to be static in nature and often rest
in the book, the Exchange believes there
is a lower risk of erroneous and
unintended executions resulting from
orders that remain in the System during
and after an affected Client Application
is logged off. The Exchange believes this
functionality enhances the overall
market quality for options traded on C2.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
C2 does not believe that the proposed
rule change will impose any burden on
competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. Specifically, the
Exchange does not believe the proposed
rule change will cause any burden on
intramarket competition because it
applies to all Permit Holders. Even
though the functionality treats MarketMakers’ quotes differently than orders,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:54 Aug 08, 2013
Jkt 229001
the Exchange notes again that it believes
that the Technical Disconnect
Mechanism benefits all market
participants because it reduces the risk
of stale quotes on the C2 Book, which
can result in erroneous or unintended
trades. Further, the Exchange does not
believe that such change will impose
any burden on intermarket competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
The Exchange notes that, should the
proposed changes make C2 more
attractive for trading, market
participants trading on other exchanges
are welcome to become Permit Holders
and trade at C2 if they determine that
this proposed rule change has made C2
more attractive or favorable.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor
received comments on the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 9 and paragraph (f) of Rule
19b–4 10 thereunder. At any time within
60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission will institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–C2–2013–029. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–C2–
2013–029 and should be submitted on
or before August 30, 2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.11
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–19258 Filed 8–8–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–C2–2013–029 on the
subject line.
9 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f).
10 17
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
11 17
Sfmt 9990
48741
E:\FR\FM\09AUN1.SGM
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
09AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 154 (Friday, August 9, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48738-48741]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-19258]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-70112; File No. SR-C2-2013-029]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change
Relating to the Technical Disconnect Functionality
August 5, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that, on July 29, 2013, C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated (the
``Exchange'' or ``C2'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described
in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4. The Commission notes that the Exchange
filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii)
of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii)) and Rule 19b-4(f)(5)
thereunder (17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(5)), which renders the proposal
effective upon filing with the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is proposing to amend its rules to codify the
Technical Disconnect Mechanism. The text of the proposed rule change is
available on the Exchange's Web site (https://www.c2exchange.com/Legal/
), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at the Commission's
Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
[[Page 48739]]
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange is proposing to amend C2 Rules to codify a Technical
Disconnect functionality which is designed to assist C2 Permit Holders
(``Permit Holders'') in the event that they lose communication with a
CBOE Application Server (``CAS'') due to a loss of connectivity between
their designated C2 Client Application and a CAS.
By way of background, C2 Permit Holders currently enter quotes and
orders into a CAS via Client Applications. For purposes of this
discussion, a ``Client Application'' is the system component, such as a
Permit Holder's custom trading application, through which a Permit
Holder communicates its quotes and/or orders to a CAS,\3\ which sits
between the Client Application and CBOE Command. Messages are passed
between a Client Application and a CAS. The quotes a Market-Maker
enters on the Exchange may be sent by a Market-Maker from one or more
Client Applications. Similarly, the orders a Permit Holder enters on
the Exchange may be sent by the Permit Holders from one or more Client
Applications. When a CAS loses communication with a Client Application
such that the CAS does not receive an appropriate response to a
Heartbeat Request within ``x'' period of time (``Heartbeat Response
Time''), the Technical Disconnect Mechanism will automatically logoff
the Permit Holder's affected Client Application and, if applicable,
will automatically cancel any Market-Maker quotes posted through the
affected Client Application. For purposes of this rule, a ``Heartbeat
Request'' refers to a message from a CAS to a Client Application to
check connectivity and which requires a response from the Client
Application in order to avoid logoff. The Heartbeat Request acts as a
virtual pulse between a CAS and a Client Application and allows a CAS
to continually monitor its connection with a Client Application.
Failure to receive a response to a Heartbeat Request within the
Heartbeat Response Time is indicative of a technical or system issue.
This function of automatically logging off a Client Application, and if
applicable automatically cancelling Market-Maker quotes posted through
the affected Client Application, when there is no response to a
Heartbeat Request within the Heartbeat Response Time is intended to
help to mitigate the potential risks associated with a loss of
communication with a Client Application (e.g., erroneous or unintended
executions due to stale quotes that remained in the C2 Book). This
serves to assist a Permit Holder when such a technical or system issue
occurs, and also assist the Exchange in maintaining a fair and orderly
market generally.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ C2 currently has numerous CASs serving Permit Holders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A CAS will generate a Heartbeat Request to a Client Application
after a specified interval (``Heartbeat Interval'' or `` `n' period of
time''). Additionally as noted above, a CAS will disconnect a Client
Application, and if applicable cancel any Market-Maker quotes posted
through the affect Client Application, after a specified period of time
if it does not receive an appropriate response to a Heartbeat Request
(Heartbeat Response Time or `` `x' period of time''). The Exchange
notes that the Heartbeat Interval and the Heartbeat Response Time
depend upon the Application Programming Interface (``API'') a Permit
Holder is using.\4\ Currently, the Exchange offers two APIs: CBOE
Market Interface (``CMi'') API and Financial Information eXchange
(``FIX'') Protocol. CMi currently has only one version available: CMi
2. A Permit Holder may determine which of the available APIs, and if
applicable, which version, it would like to use.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ An API is a computer interface that allows market
participants with authorized access to interface electronically with
the Exchange. Multiple versions of each API may exist and other APIs
may be supported from time-to-time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
First, a CAS on the CMi 2 API will generate a Heartbeat Request to
a Client Application (i) after the CAS does not receive any messages
from a particular Client Application for ``n'' period of time or (ii)
after every ``n'' period of time. A Permit Holder using CMi 2 will
determine whether Heartbeat Requests are generated every ``n'' period
of time or only if no messages are received for ``n'' period of time. A
Permit Holder using the CMi 2 API will also determine the value of
``n'' at logon. In no event shall ``n'' be less than three (3) seconds
or exceed twenty (20) seconds. If a CAS generates a Heartbeat Request
only after it does not receive any messages from a particular Client
Application for ``n'' period of time, the value of ``x'' (Heartbeat
Response Time) will be set at a half (.5) second. If a CAS generates a
Heartbeat Request every ``n'' period of time, the value of ``x'' shall
be equal to the value of ``n.'' For example, if a Permit Holder using
CMi 2 chooses to receive a Heartbeat Request every ``n'' period of time
and sets the value of ``n'' to 6 seconds, then the Permit Holder's
Client Application must respond to a Heartbeat Request within 6 seconds
or the Client Application will be disconnected.
A CAS on the FIX API will generate a Heartbeat Message to a Client
Application after the CAS does not receive any messages from a
particular Client Application for ``n'' period of time. If the CAS does
not receive a response to the ``Heartbeat Message'' from the Client
Application for ``n'' period of time, the CAS shall generate a
Heartbeat Request to the Client Application. For purposes of this rule,
a ``Heartbeat Message'' refers to a message from a CAS to a Client
Application to check connectivity. Failure to respond to a Heartbeat
Message within ``n'' period of time will trigger the generation of a
Heartbeat Request. A Permit Holder using the FIX API will determine the
value of ``n'' at logon. In no event shall ``n'' be less than five (5)
seconds. The value of ``x'' (Heartbeat Response Time) will be set equal
to the value of ``n.'' For example, if a Permit Holder using FIX sets
the value of ``n'' to 6 seconds, then the Permit Holder's Client
Application must respond to a Heartbeat Request within 6 seconds or the
Client Application will be disconnected.
The following example illustrates the manner in which the Technical
Disconnect Mechanism functions on CMi 2 when a Permit Holder chooses to
have the CAS generate a Heartbeat Request every ``n'' period of time.
For purposes of this example only, the Permit Holder will be a non-
Market-Maker and ``n'' will be set by the Permit Holder at 5 seconds:
(1) 10:00:000--Heartbeat Request sent to Client Application after logon
10:00:020--CAS receives a message from Client Application
10:00:050--Heartbeat Request sent to Client Application
10:00:100--No response to Heartbeat Request received by CAS within
5 seconds
-- Client Application automatically logged off and pending orders
previously entered from the Client Application remain in the System
The following examples illustrate the manner in which the Technical
Disconnect Mechanism functions on CMi 2 when a Permit Holder chooses to
have the CAS generate a Heartbeat Request only when the CAS does not
receive any messages from the Client Application for ``n'' period of
time. For purposes of these examples only, the Permit Holder will be a
Market-Maker
[[Page 48740]]
and ``n'' will be set by the Permit Holder at 5 seconds:
(1) 10:00:000--Heartbeat Request sent to Client Application after logon
10:00:020--CAS receives a message from Client Application
--Counter re-starts
10:00:070--No messages received from Client Application within 5
seconds
--CAS generates Heartbeat Request
10:00:073--CAS receives a message from Client Application
-- Counter restarts
(2) 10:00:000--Heartbeat Request sent to Client Application within
login
10:00:020--CAS receives a message from Client Application
--Counter re-starts
10:00:070--No messages received from Client Application within 5
seconds
--CAS generates Heartbeat Request
10:00:075--No messages received from Client Application within a .5
second
--Client Application automatically logged off and pending Market-
Maker quotes previously entered from the Client Application
automatically canceled
Lastly, the following example illustrates the manner in which the
Technical Disconnect Mechanism functions on FIX. For purposes of this
example only, the Permit Holder will be a Market-Maker and ``n'' will
be set by the Permit Holder at 5 seconds:
(1) 10:00:000--Heartbeat Request sent to Client Application after logon
10:00:020--CAS receives a message from Client Application
--Counter restarts
10:00:070--No messages received from Client Application within 5
seconds
--CAS generates Heartbeat Message
10:00:120--No messages received from Client Application within 5
seconds
--CAS generates Heartbeat Request
10:00:170--No messages received from Client Application within 5
seconds
--Client Application automatically logged off and pending Market-
Maker quotes previously entered from the Client Application
automatically canceled
As demonstrated above, a Heartbeat Request may be generated (i)
every ``n'' period of time or (ii) when the CAS does not receive any
messages from a Client Application for a specified period of time
(``n'' period of time) depending upon the API being used. Regardless of
the API being used however, if an appropriate response message to a
Heartbeat Request is not received by the CAS from the Client
Application within a specified period of time (``x'' period of time or
Heartbeat Response Time), the Technical Disconnect Mechanism is
triggered and the Client Application is automatically logged off and,
if applicable, a Market-Maker's quotes through that Client Application
are automatically canceled.
The Exchange notes that any non-connectivity is event- and Client
Application-specific. Therefore, the cancellation of a Market-Maker's
quotes entered into a CAS via a particular Client Application will
neither impact nor determine the treatment of the quotes of the same or
other Market-Makers entered into a CAS via a separate and distinct
Client Application. The Technical Disconnect Mechanism will not impact
or determine the treatment of orders previously entered into a CAS. As
discussed above, the function of automatically cancelling a Market-
Maker's quotes posted through an affected Client Application is
intended to help to mitigate the potential risks associated with a loss
of communication with a Client Application. For example, in today's
market, Market-Makers' quotes are rapidly changing and can have a
lifespan of only milliseconds. Additionally, under the System, trades
are automatically affected against the Market-Maker's then current
quote. Therefore, if a Permit Holder's Client Application is
disconnected for any period of time, it is very possible that any
quotes posted through that Client Application would be stale by the
time the Permit Holder reestablished connectivity. Consequently, any
resulting execution of such quotes is more likely to be erroneous or
unintended. Conversely, the Exchange notes that orders tend to be
static in nature and often rest in the book. Indeed, certain order
types, such as Market-on-Close orders, are intended to rest in the book
for a period of time. As such, there is a lower risk of erroneous or
unintended executions resulting from orders that remained in the System
during and after an affected Client Application was logged off.
The Exchange next notes that the CAS will send a logout message to
an affected Client Application that confirms that the Client
Application connection has been terminated. Once connectivity to the
Client Application is reestablished, a Market-Maker affected by the
mechanism is able to send messages to the CAS to reestablish the
Market-Maker's quotes. Any Market-Maker affected by the Technical
Disconnect Mechanism is not relieved of its obligation to provide
continuous electronic quotes in accordance with the Exchange rules.\5\
The Exchange finally notes that the Technical Disconnect Mechanism is
enabled for all Permit Holders and may not be disabled by Permit
Holders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See C2 Rule 8.5, C2 Rule 8.13 and C2 Rule 8.17.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that while information relating to
connectivity and the Technical Disconnect Mechanism are already
available to Permit Holders via technical specifications, codifying
this information within the rule text will provide additional
transparency and further reduce potential confusion.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular,
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\6\ Specifically, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \7\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Additionally,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \8\ requirement that the rules of an exchange not be
designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers,
brokers, or dealers. In particular, the Exchange believes that
codifying in the rules how the Technical Disconnect Mechanism works
provides additional transparency in the rules and provides an
additional avenue to easily understand C2's system and processes. The
Exchange believes this will also reduce any potential confusion,
thereby removing a potential impediment to and perfecting the mechanism
for a free and open market and a national market system, and, in
general, protecting investors and the public interest. Additionally,
the Technical Disconnect Mechanism is a valuable tool that is designed
to help maintain a fair and orderly market. The Exchange believes that
the Technical Disconnect
[[Page 48741]]
Mechanism assists with the maintenance of fair and orderly markets by
helping to mitigate the potential risks associated with a loss in
communication with a Client Application, especially risk associated
with a loss in communication with a Client Application of Market-Maker
that is providing quotes across a multitude of series and classes. The
Exchange also believes that the proposed rule change is designed to not
permit unfair discrimination among market participants. The Exchange
notes that the Technical Disconnect Mechanism automatic logoff function
is applicable to all Permit Holders and may not be disabled by any
Permit Holder. The Exchange believes that the Technical Disconnect
Mechanism benefits the marketplace because it is designed to help alert
a Permit Holder to a potential technical or system issue and
automatically logoff a Permit Holder's Client Application within
certain prescribed parameters. With respect to the Technical Disconnect
Mechanism's automatic cancellation of Market-Maker quotes, the Exchange
also believes it is not unfair to cancel only Market-Maker quotes and
not orders. Particularly, the automatic cancellation of Market-Maker
quotes benefits the marketplace because it is designed to help reduce
the risk of stale quotes remaining on the C2 Book in the event that a
CAS loses connectivity with a Client Application (e.g., potentially
resulting in erroneous or unintended executions). Furthermore, the
functionality provides for the protection of Market-Makers, who must
bear the burden of market risk for stale quotes well as for the
protection of investors and the efficiency and fairness of the markets
as a whole. Conversely, because orders tend to be static in nature and
often rest in the book, the Exchange believes there is a lower risk of
erroneous and unintended executions resulting from orders that remain
in the System during and after an affected Client Application is logged
off. The Exchange believes this functionality enhances the overall
market quality for options traded on C2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\8\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
C2 does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Specifically, the Exchange does
not believe the proposed rule change will cause any burden on
intramarket competition because it applies to all Permit Holders. Even
though the functionality treats Market-Makers' quotes differently than
orders, the Exchange notes again that it believes that the Technical
Disconnect Mechanism benefits all market participants because it
reduces the risk of stale quotes on the C2 Book, which can result in
erroneous or unintended trades. Further, the Exchange does not believe
that such change will impose any burden on intermarket competition that
is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the
Act. The Exchange notes that, should the proposed changes make C2 more
attractive for trading, market participants trading on other exchanges
are welcome to become Permit Holders and trade at C2 if they determine
that this proposed rule change has made C2 more attractive or
favorable.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \9\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 \10\
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed
rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-C2-2013-029 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-C2-2013-029. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-C2-2013-029 and should be
submitted on or before August 30, 2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-19258 Filed 8-8-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P