Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From India: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2011-2012, 48143-48145 [2013-19096]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 152 / Wednesday, August 7, 2013 / Notices comments submitted by any interested party. CITA will make a determination on any request it considers within 60 calendar days of the close of the comment period. If CITA is unable to make a determination within 60 calendar days, it will publish a notice in the Federal Register, including the date it will make a determination. If a determination under Section 322(a) of the Act is affirmative, CITA may provide tariff relief to a U.S. industry to the extent necessary to remedy or prevent serious damage or actual threat thereof and to facilitate adjustment by the domestic industry to import competition. The import tariff relief is effective beginning on the date that CITA’s affirmative determination is published in the Federal Register. Entities submitting requests, responses or rebuttals to CITA may submit both a public and confidential version of their submissions. If the request is accepted, the public version will be posted on the dedicated U.S.-Peru Free Trade Agreement textile safeguards section of the Office of Textiles and Apparel (OTEXA) Web site. The confidential version of the request, responses or rebuttals will not be shared with the public as they may contain business confidential information. Entities submitting responses or rebuttals may use the public version of the request as a basis for responses. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES II. Method of Collection When an interested party files a request for a textile and apparel safeguard action with CITA, ten copies of any such request must be provided in a paper format. If business confidential information is provided, two copies of a non-confidential version must also be provided. If CITA determines that the request provides the necessary information to be considered, it publishes a Federal Register notice seeking public comments on the request. To the extent business confidential information is provided, a nonconfidential version must also be provided. Any interested party may submit information to rebut, clarify, or correct public comments submitted by any interested party. III. Data OMB Control Number: 0625–0267. Form Number(s): None. Type of Review: Regular submission (extension of a currently approved information collection). Affected Public: Individuals or households; business or other for-profit organizations. VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:03 Aug 06, 2013 Jkt 229001 Estimated Number of Respondents: 6 (1 for Request; 5 for Comments). Estimated Time Per Response: 4 hours for a Request; and 4 hours for each Comment. Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 24. Estimated Total Annual Cost to Public: $960. IV. Request for Comments Comments are invited on: (a) whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden (including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized and/or included in the request for OMB approval of this information collection; they also will become a matter of public record. Dated: August 1, 2013. Gwellnar Banks, Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer. [FR Doc. 2013–18963 Filed 8–6–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–533–824] Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From India: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2011– 2012 Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, and strip (PET Film) from India. The period of review (POR) is July 1, 2011, through June 30, 2012. This review covers three respondents, Jindal Poly Films Limited (Jindal), SRF Limited (SRF), and Polyplex Corporation Ltd. (Polyplex). Jindal and SRF were selected AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 48143 as the mandatory respondents while Polyplex is the non-selected respondent. The Department preliminarily determines that SRF did, and that Jindal did not, make sales of subject merchandise at prices below normal value (NV) during the POR. The preliminary results are listed below in the section titled ‘‘Preliminary Results of Review.’’ Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Effective Date: August 7, 2013. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elfi Blum or Toni Page, AD/CVD Operations, Office 6, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0197 or (202) 482– 1398, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Scope of the Order The products covered by the antidumping duty order are all gauges of raw, pretreated, or primed PET Film, whether extruded or coextruded. Excluded are metallized films and other finished films that have had at least one of their surfaces modified by the application of a performance-enhancing resinous or inorganic layer of more than 0.00001 inches thick. Imports of PET Film are currently classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under item number 3920.62.00.90. HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes. The written description of the scope of the antidumping duty order is dispositive. Methodology The Department has conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Export price and constructed export price are calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. NV is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice.1 The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Import 1 See Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from India,’’ dated concurrently with this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). E:\FR\FM\07AUN1.SGM 07AUN1 48144 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 152 / Wednesday, August 7, 2013 / Notices Administration’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS). IA ACCESS is available to registered users at http://iaaccess.trade.gov and in the Central Records Unit, room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at http://www.trade.gov/ ia/. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Non-Selected Respondent With regard to determining an appropriate rate to be applied to the non-selected respondent Polyplex, the statute and the Department’s regulations do not directly address the establishment of a rate to be applied to companies not selected for individual examination where the Department limited its examination in an administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. The Department’s practice in cases involving limited selection of respondents has been to look for guidance in section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for calculating the allothers rate in an investigation. The Department generally weight-averages the rates calculated for the mandatory respondents, excluding zero and de minimis rates and rates based entirely on facts available, and applies that resulting weighted-average margin to non-selected respondents.2 In this review, we have preliminarily calculated a zero or de minimis weighted-average dumping margin for mandatory respondent Jindal and an above de minimis rate for the other mandatory respondent, SRF. Based on this, we have based the dumping margin for Polyplex on the above de minimis rate calculated for SRF. Preliminary Results of Review mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES We preliminarily determine the following weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period July 1, 2011, through June 30, 2012. 2 See, e.g., Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Preliminary Results of New Shipper Review and Partial Rescission of Administrative Review, 73 FR 8273 (February 13, 2008), unchanged in Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and New Shipper Review, 73 FR 49162 (August 20, 2008). VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:03 Aug 06, 2013 Jkt 229001 merchandise produced and/or exported by Jindal, SRF, and Polyplex. The Manufacturer/exporter Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the Jindal Poly Films Limited .......... 0.00 date of publication of the final results of SRF Limited .............................. 0.71 review. For assessment purposes, where Polyplex Corporation Ltd .......... 0.71 the respondent reported the entered value for its sales, we calculated importer-specific (or customer-specific) Disclosure and Public Comment ad valorem assessment rates based on The Department will disclose to the ratio of the total amount of the parties the calculations performed in dumping duties calculated for the connection with these preliminary examined sales to the total entered results within five days of the date of value of those same sales.10 However, 3 Interested publication of this notice. where the respondent did not report the parties may submit case briefs not later entered value for its sales, we will than 30 days after the date of calculate importer-specific (or customerpublication of this notice.4 Rebuttal specific) per-unit duty assessment rates. briefs, limited to issues raised in the We will instruct CBP to assess case briefs, may be filed not later than antidumping duties on all appropriate five days after the date for filing case entries covered by this review if any 5 Parties who submit case briefs or briefs. per-unit duty assessment rate calculated rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are in the final results of this review is encouraged to submit with each above de minimis (i.e., at or above 0.50 argument: (1) A statement of the issue; percent). For any individually examined (2) a brief summary of the argument; respondents whose weighted-average and (3) a table of authorities.6 Case and dumping margin is above de minimis in rebuttal briefs should be filed using IA the final results, we will calculate ACCESS.7 Interested parties who wish to request importer-specific ad valorem duty assessment rates based on the ratio of a hearing, or to participate if one is the total amount of antidumping duties requested, must submit a written calculated for the importer’s examined request to the Assistant Secretary for sales to the total entered value of the Import Administration, filed sales in accordance with 19 CFR 8 An electronically via IA ACCESS. 351.212(b)(1). Pursuant to 19 CFR electronically-filed document must be 351.106(c)(2), we intend to instruct CBP received successfully in its entirety by to liquidate without regard to the Department’s electronic records antidumping duties any entries for system, IA ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. which the assessment rate is zero or de Eastern Standard Time within 30 days minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent).11 after the date of publication of this notice.9 Requests should contain: (1) Cash Deposit Requirements The party’s name, address, and The following deposit requirements telephone number; (2) the number of will be effective for all shipments of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be PET Film from India entered, or discussed. Issues raised in the hearing withdrawn from warehouse, for will be limited to those raised in the consumption on or after the date of respective case briefs. The Department publication of the final results of this will issue the final results of this administrative review, as provided for administrative review, including the by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) results of its analysis of issues raised in The cash deposit rate for the company any written briefs, not later than 120 under review will be the rate days after the date of publication of this established in the final results of this notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) review (except, if the rate is zero or de of the Act, unless that time is extended. minimis, i.e., less than 0.5 percent, no cash deposit will be required); (2) for Assessment Rates previously reviewed or investigated The Department shall determine, and companies not listed above, the cash U.S. Customs and Border Protection deposit rate will continue to be the (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties company-specific rate published for the on all appropriate entries. We will most recent period; (3) if the exporter is instruct CBP to liquidate entries of not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the less-than-fair-value 3 See 19 CFR 351.224(b). investigation, but the manufacturer is, 4 See 19 CFR 351.309(c). the cash deposit rate will be the rate 5 See 19 CFR 351.309(d). 6 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). established for the most recent period Weightedaverage margin (percent) 7 See 8 See 19 CFR 351.303. 19 CFR 351.310(c). 10 See 9 Id. PO 00000 Frm 00010 11 See Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07AUN1.SGM 19 CFR 351.212(b). 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1). 07AUN1 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 152 / Wednesday, August 7, 2013 / Notices for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) if neither the exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm covered in this or any previous review, the cash deposit rate will be the all others rate for this proceeding, 5.71 percent. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: July 31, 2013 . Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 1. Scope of the Order 2. Date of Sale 3. Discussion of Methodology 4. Product Comparisons 5. Export Price and Constructed Export Price 6. Normal Value 7. Cost of Production Analysis 8. Currency Conversion [FR Doc. 2013–19096 Filed 8–6–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–357–818] Lemon Juice From Argentina: Continuation of Suspended Antidumping Duty Investigation Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: As a result of the determination by the Department of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) and the International Trade Commission (‘‘ITC’’) that termination of the suspended investigation on lemon juice from Argentina would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, and material injury to an industry in the United States, the Department is mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES AGENCY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:03 Aug 06, 2013 Jkt 229001 publishing notice of the continuation of this suspended antidumping duty investigation. DATES: Effective Date: August 7, 2013. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anne D’Alauro or Judith Wey Rudman, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–4830 or (202) 482–0192, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On August 1, 2012, the Department initiated, and the ITC instituted, a sunset review of the suspended antidumping duty investigation on lemon juice from Argentina (‘‘suspended investigation’’), pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’). See Initiation of Five-year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review and Correction, 77 FR 45589 (August 1, 2012) and [Investigation Nos. 731–TA– 1105–1106 (Review)] Lemon Juice from Argentina and Mexico, 77 FR 45653 (August 1, 2012). As a result of its review, the Department determined that termination of the suspended investigation on lemon juice from Argentina would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping and notified the ITC of the magnitude of the margins likely to prevail, should the suspended investigation be terminated. See Lemon Juice from Argentina; Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Suspended Antidumping Duty Investigation, 77 FR 73021 (December 7, 2012). On July 10, 2013, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act, the ITC determined that termination of the suspended investigation on lemon juice from Argentina would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. See Lemon Juice from Argentina, 78 FR 46610 (August 1, 2013). Therefore, pursuant to section 351.218(f)(4) of the Department’s regulations, the Department is publishing this notice of the continuation of the suspended investigation on lemon juice from Argentina. Scope The merchandise covered by the suspended investigation includes certain lemon juice for further manufacture, with or without addition of preservatives, sugar, or other sweeteners, regardless of the GPL (grams per liter of citric acid) level of PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 48145 concentration, brix level, brix/acid ratio, pulp content, clarity, grade, horticulture method (e.g., organic or not), processed form (e.g., frozen or not-fromconcentrate), FDA standard of identity, the size of the container in which packed, or the method of packing. Excluded from the scope are: (1) Lemon juice at any level of concentration packed in retail-sized containers ready for sale to consumers, typically at a level of concentration of 48 GPL; and (2) beverage products such as lemonade that typically contain 20% or less lemon juice as an ingredient. Lemon juice is classifiable under subheadings 2009.39.6020, 2009.31.6020, 2009.31.4000, 2009.31.6040, and 2009.39.6040 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). While HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, our written description of the scope of the suspended investigation is dispositive. Continuation of the Suspended Investigation As a result of the respective determinations by the Department and the ITC that termination of the suspended investigation on lemon juice from Argentina would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping and material injury to an industry in the United States, pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the Act, the Department hereby gives notice of the continuation of the suspended investigation on lemon juice from Argentina. The effective date of continuation will be the date of publication in the Federal Register of this Continuation Notice. Because the Department is continuing the suspended investigation, the suspension agreement will also continue to remain in effect. See Suspension of Antidumping Duty Investigation: Lemon Juice From Argentina, 72 FR 53991 (September 21, 2007). Pursuant to sections 751(c)(2) of the Act, the Department intends to initiate the next five-year sunset review of the suspended investigation on lemon juice from Argentina not later than 30 days prior to the fifth anniversary of the effective date of continuation. This five-year (sunset) review and notice are in accordance with section 751(c) of the Act and published pursuant to section 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: August 1, 2013. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. 2013–19067 Filed 8–6–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P E:\FR\FM\07AUN1.SGM 07AUN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 152 (Wednesday, August 7, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48143-48145]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-19096]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-533-824]


Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From India: 
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2011-
2012

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an 
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on polyethylene 
terephthalate film, sheet, and strip (PET Film) from India. The period 
of review (POR) is July 1, 2011, through June 30, 2012. This review 
covers three respondents, Jindal Poly Films Limited (Jindal), SRF 
Limited (SRF), and Polyplex Corporation Ltd. (Polyplex). Jindal and SRF 
were selected as the mandatory respondents while Polyplex is the non-
selected respondent. The Department preliminarily determines that SRF 
did, and that Jindal did not, make sales of subject merchandise at 
prices below normal value (NV) during the POR. The preliminary results 
are listed below in the section titled ``Preliminary Results of 
Review.'' Interested parties are invited to comment on these 
preliminary results.

DATES: Effective Date: August 7, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elfi Blum or Toni Page, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office 6, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
0197 or (202) 482-1398, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Scope of the Order

    The products covered by the antidumping duty order are all gauges 
of raw, pretreated, or primed PET Film, whether extruded or coextruded. 
Excluded are metallized films and other finished films that have had at 
least one of their surfaces modified by the application of a 
performance-enhancing resinous or inorganic layer of more than 0.00001 
inches thick. Imports of PET Film are currently classifiable in the 
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under item 
number 3920.62.00.90. HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience 
and customs purposes. The written description of the scope of the 
antidumping duty order is dispositive.

Methodology

    The Department has conducted this review in accordance with section 
751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Export price 
and constructed export price are calculated in accordance with section 
772 of the Act. NV is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the 
Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our 
conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, which is hereby 
adopted by this notice.\1\ The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a 
public document and is on file electronically via Import

[[Page 48144]]

Administration's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized 
Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS). IA ACCESS is available to 
registered users at http://iaaccess.trade.gov and in the Central 
Records Unit, room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. In 
addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can 
be accessed directly on the Internet at http://www.trade.gov/ia/. The 
signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of 
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant 
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to 
Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration 
``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of Antidumping 
Duty Administrative Review: Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, 
and Strip from India,'' dated concurrently with this notice 
(Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Non-Selected Respondent

    With regard to determining an appropriate rate to be applied to the 
non-selected respondent Polyplex, the statute and the Department's 
regulations do not directly address the establishment of a rate to be 
applied to companies not selected for individual examination where the 
Department limited its examination in an administrative review pursuant 
to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. The Department's practice in cases 
involving limited selection of respondents has been to look for 
guidance in section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions 
for calculating the all-others rate in an investigation. The Department 
generally weight-averages the rates calculated for the mandatory 
respondents, excluding zero and de minimis rates and rates based 
entirely on facts available, and applies that resulting weighted-
average margin to non-selected respondents.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See, e.g., Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People's 
Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review, Preliminary Results of New Shipper Review and 
Partial Rescission of Administrative Review, 73 FR 8273 (February 
13, 2008), unchanged in Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People's 
Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review and New Shipper Review, 73 FR 49162 (August 20, 2008).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In this review, we have preliminarily calculated a zero or de 
minimis weighted-average dumping margin for mandatory respondent Jindal 
and an above de minimis rate for the other mandatory respondent, SRF. 
Based on this, we have based the dumping margin for Polyplex on the 
above de minimis rate calculated for SRF.

Preliminary Results of Review

    We preliminarily determine the following weighted-average dumping 
margins exist for the period July 1, 2011, through June 30, 2012.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Weighted-
                                                               average
                   Manufacturer/exporter                        margin
                                                              (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jindal Poly Films Limited..................................         0.00
SRF Limited................................................         0.71
Polyplex Corporation Ltd...................................         0.71
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure and Public Comment

    The Department will disclose to parties the calculations performed 
in connection with these preliminary results within five days of the 
date of publication of this notice.\3\ Interested parties may submit 
case briefs not later than 30 days after the date of publication of 
this notice.\4\ Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case 
briefs, may be filed not later than five days after the date for filing 
case briefs.\5\ Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in 
this proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A 
statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a 
table of authorities.\6\ Case and rebuttal briefs should be filed using 
IA ACCESS.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See 19 CFR 351.224(b).
    \4\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c).
    \5\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
    \6\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
    \7\ See 19 CFR 351.303.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Interested parties who wish to request a hearing, or to participate 
if one is requested, must submit a written request to the Assistant 
Secretary for Import Administration, filed electronically via IA 
ACCESS.\8\ An electronically-filed document must be received 
successfully in its entirety by the Department's electronic records 
system, IA ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time within 30 days 
after the date of publication of this notice.\9\ Requests should 
contain: (1) The party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) the 
number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. 
Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the 
respective case briefs. The Department will issue the final results of 
this administrative review, including the results of its analysis of 
issues raised in any written briefs, not later than 120 days after the 
date of publication of this notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of 
the Act, unless that time is extended.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
    \9\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment Rates

    The Department shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate 
entries. We will instruct CBP to liquidate entries of merchandise 
produced and/or exported by Jindal, SRF, and Polyplex. The Department 
intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date 
of publication of the final results of review. For assessment purposes, 
where the respondent reported the entered value for its sales, we 
calculated importer-specific (or customer-specific) ad valorem 
assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of the dumping 
duties calculated for the examined sales to the total entered value of 
those same sales.\10\ However, where the respondent did not report the 
entered value for its sales, we will calculate importer-specific (or 
customer-specific) per-unit duty assessment rates. We will instruct CBP 
to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this 
review if any per-unit duty assessment rate calculated in the final 
results of this review is above de minimis (i.e., at or above 0.50 
percent). For any individually examined respondents whose weighted-
average dumping margin is above de minimis in the final results, we 
will calculate importer-specific ad valorem duty assessment rates based 
on the ratio of the total amount of antidumping duties calculated for 
the importer's examined sales to the total entered value of the sales 
in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Pursuant to 19 CFR 
351.106(c)(2), we intend to instruct CBP to liquidate without regard to 
antidumping duties any entries for which the assessment rate is zero or 
de minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent).\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b).
    \11\ See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following deposit requirements will be effective for all 
shipments of PET Film from India entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 
for consumption on or after the date of publication of the final 
results of this administrative review, as provided for by section 
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for the company 
under review will be the rate established in the final results of this 
review (except, if the rate is zero or de minimis, i.e., less than 0.5 
percent, no cash deposit will be required); (2) for previously reviewed 
or investigated companies not listed above, the cash deposit rate will 
continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recent 
period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a 
prior review, or the less-than-fair-value investigation, but the 
manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for 
the most recent period

[[Page 48145]]

for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) if neither the 
exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm covered in this or any previous 
review, the cash deposit rate will be the all others rate for this 
proceeding, 5.71 percent. These deposit requirements, when imposed, 
shall remain in effect until further notice.

Notification to Importers

    This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of 
their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.
    We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

     Dated: July 31, 2013 .
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum

1. Scope of the Order
2. Date of Sale
3. Discussion of Methodology
4. Product Comparisons
5. Export Price and Constructed Export Price
6. Normal Value
7. Cost of Production Analysis
8. Currency Conversion

[FR Doc. 2013-19096 Filed 8-6-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P