Solid Urea From the Russian Federation: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2011-2012, 46571-46573 [2013-18551]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 148 / Thursday, August 1, 2013 / Notices
The review was initiated on December
31, 2012, for the November 1, 2011
through October 31, 2012 period of
review. See Initiation of Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews and Request for Revocation in
Part, 77 FR 77017 (December 31, 2012).
On January 22, 2013, the Department
issued its questionnaire to Metinvest,
the common parent of Azovstal and
Ilyich (collectively, the companies). The
companies submitted their joint
response on March 1, 2013.
The Department has conducted this
review in accordance with section
751(a)(1)(C) of the Act, which specifies
that the Department shall ‘‘review the
current status of, and compliance with,
any agreement by reason of which an
investigation was suspended.’’ In this
case, the Department, Azovstal and
Ilyich signed the Agreement suspending
the underlying antidumping duty
investigation on September 29, 2008.
Pursuant to the Agreement, each
signatory producer/exporter
individually agrees to make any
necessary price revisions to eliminate
completely any amount by which the
normal value (NV) of the subject
merchandise exceeds the U.S. price of
its merchandise subject to the
Agreement. See Agreement, 73 FR
57602, 57603. Our review of the
information submitted by the companies
indicates that they have adhered to the
terms of the Agreement and that the
Agreement is functioning as intended.
For a full description of the
methodology underlying our
conclusions, see ‘‘Decision
Memorandum for Preliminary Results of
Administrative Review of the
Agreement Suspending the
Antidumping Duty Investigation on
Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate
from Ukraine’’ from Lynn Fischer Fox,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of Policy
and Negotiations to Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration (Preliminary Decision
Memorandum), dated concurrently with
these results and hereby adopted by this
notice. The Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is made available to the public via
Import Administration’s Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS).
IA ACCESS is available to registered
users at https://iaaccess.trade.gov and
in the Department’s Central Records
Unit, located in room 7046 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum can
be found on the Internet at https://
www.trade.gov/ia. The signed
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:02 Jul 31, 2013
Jkt 229001
46571
Preliminary Decision Memorandum and
the electronic version of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Public Comment
Solid Urea From the Russian
Federation: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2011–2012
Interested parties may submit case
briefs not later than 30 days after the
date of publication of this notice.2
Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised
in the case briefs, may be filed not later
than five days after the date for filing
case briefs.3 Parties who submit case
briefs or rebuttal briefs in this
proceeding are encouraged to provide:
(1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief
summary of the argument; and (3) a
table of authorities.4
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c),
interested parties who wish to request a
hearing, or to participate if one is
requested, must submit a written
request to the Assistant Secretary for
Import Administration, filed
electronically via IA ACCESS. An
electronically filed document must be
received successfully in its entirety by
the Department’s electronic records
system, IA ACCESS, by 5 p.m. Eastern
Time within 30 days after the date of
publication of this notice. Requests
should contain: (1) The party’s name,
address and telephone number; (2) the
number of participants; and (3) a list of
issues to be discussed. Issues raised in
the hearing will be limited to those
raised in the respective case briefs. The
Department intends to issue the final
results of this administrative review,
including the results of its analysis of
the issues raised in any written briefs,
not later than 120 days after the date of
publication of this notice, pursuant to
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
We are issuing and publishing these
results in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: July 26, 2013.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013–18543 Filed 7–31–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
PO 00000
2 See
19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii).
19 CFR 351.309(d)(1).
4 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
3 See
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
International Trade Administration
[A–821–801]
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is conducting an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on solid urea
from the Russian Federation (Russia).
The period of review (POR) is July 1,
2011, through June 30, 2012. The review
covers one producer/exporter of the
subject merchandise, MCC EuroChem
(EuroChem). We preliminarily find that
EuroChem has not sold subject
merchandise at less than normal value
during the POR.
DATES: Effective Date: August 1, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bryan Hansen or Minoo Hatten, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 1, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–3683 or (202) 482–
1690, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order
is solid urea. The product is currently
classified under the Harmonized Tariff
Schedules of the United States (HTSUS)
item number 3102.10.00.00. The HTSUS
subheading is provided for convenience
and customs purposes. A full
description of the scope of the order is
contained in the memorandum from
Gary Taverman, Senior Advisor for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant
Secretary for Import Administration,
‘‘Decision Memorandum for Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review: Solid Urea from
the Russian Federation’’ dated
concurrently with this notice
(‘‘Preliminary Decision Memorandum’’),
which is hereby adopted by this notice.
The written description is dispositive.
The Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Import
Administration’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (‘‘IA
ACCESS’’). Access to IA ACCESS is
available to registered users at https://
E:\FR\FM\01AUN1.SGM
01AUN1
46572
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 148 / Thursday, August 1, 2013 / Notices
iaaccess.trade.gov and is available to all
parties in the Central Records Unit,
room 7046 of the main Department of
Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly on the Internet at https://
www.trade.gov/ia/. The signed
Preliminary Decision Memorandum and
the electronic versions of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum are
identical in content.
Methodology
The Department has conducted this
review in accordance with section
751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act). Constructed export
price is calculated in accordance with
section 772 of the Act. Normal value is
calculated in accordance with section
773 of the Act. To determine the
appropriate comparison method, the
Department applied a ‘‘differential
pricing’’ analysis and has preliminarily
determined to use the average-toaverage method in making comparisons
of constructed export price and normal
value for EuroChem. For a full
description of the methodology
underlying our conclusions, see
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Preliminary Results of the Review
As a result of this review, we
preliminarily determine that a dumping
margin of 0.00 percent exists for
EuroChem for the period July 1, 2011,
through June 30, 2012.
Disclosure and Public Comment
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c),
interested parties may submit cases
briefs not later than 30 days after the
date of publication of this notice.
Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised
in the case briefs, may be filed not later
than five days after the date for filing
case briefs.1 Parties who submit case
briefs or rebuttal briefs in this
proceeding are encouraged to submit
with each argument: (1) A statement of
the issue; (2) a brief summary of the
argument; and (3) a table of authorities.2
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c),
interested parties who wish to request a
hearing, or to participate if one is
requested, must submit a written
request to the Assistant Secretary for
Import Administration, filed
electronically via IA ACCESS. An
electronically filed document must be
received successfully in its entirety by
the Department’s electronic records
system, IA ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m.
Eastern Time within 30 days after the
1 See
2 See
19 CFR 351.309(d).
19 CFR 351.309(d)(2) and (d)(2).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:02 Jul 31, 2013
Jkt 229001
date of publication of this notice.
Requests should contain: (1) The party’s
name, address and telephone number;
(2) the number of participants; and (3)
a list of issues to be discussed. Issues
raised in the hearing will be limited to
those raised in the respective case
briefs. The Department intends to issue
the final results of this administrative
review, including the results of its
analysis of the issues raised in any
written briefs, not later than 120 days
after the date of publication of this
notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A)
of the Act.
Assessment Rates
Upon completion of the
administrative review, the Department
shall determine and U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) shall assess
antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries. If EuroChem’s weighted-average
dumping margin is not zero or de
minimis in the final results of this
review, we will calculate importerspecific assessment rates on the basis of
the ratio of the total amount of
antidumping duties calculated for an
importer’s examined sales and the total
entered value of such sales in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
If EuroChem’s weighted-average
dumping margin continues to be zero or
de minimis in the final results of review,
we will instruct CBP not to assess duties
on any of its entries in accordance with
the Final Modification for Reviews, i.e.,
‘‘{w}here the weighted-average margin
of dumping for the exporter is
determined to be zero or de minimis, no
antidumping duties will be assessed.’’ 3
The Department clarified its
‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on
May 6, 2003.4 This clarification will
apply to entries of subject merchandise
during the POR produced by EuroChem
for which it did not know its
merchandise was destined for the
United States. In such instances, we will
instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed
entries at the all-others rate if there is no
rate for the intermediate company(ies)
involved in the transaction.
We intend to issue instructions to
CBP 15 days after publication of the
final results of this review.
3 See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of
the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102
(February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for
Reviews).
4 For a full discussion of this clarification, see
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954
(May 6, 2003) (Assessment Policy Notice).
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements
will be effective upon publication of the
notice of final results of administrative
review for all shipments of solid urea
from Russia entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after
the date of publication as provided by
section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash
deposit rate for EuroChem will be the
rate established in the final results of
this administrative review; (2) for
previously reviewed or investigated
companies not listed above, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published for the
most recently completed segment of this
proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a
firm covered in this review, a prior
review, or the original investigation but
the manufacturer is, the cash deposit
rate will be the rate established for the
manufacturer of the merchandise for the
most recently completed segment of this
proceeding; (4) the cash deposit rate for
all other manufacturers or exporters will
continue to be 64.93 percent, the allothers rate established in Urea From the
Union of Soviet Socialist Republics;
Final Determination of Sales at Less
Than Fair Value, 52 FR 19557 (May 26,
1987). These cash deposit requirements,
when imposed, shall remain in effect
until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a preliminary
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
We are issuing and publishing these
results in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: July 26, 2013.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
Appendix I—List of Topics Discussed in
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
Scope of the Order
Comparisons to Normal Value
A. Determination of Comparison Method
B. Results of the Differential Pricing
Analysis
Product Comparisons
Date of Sale
Constructed Export Price
Normal Value
E:\FR\FM\01AUN1.SGM
01AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 148 / Thursday, August 1, 2013 / Notices
A. Home Market Viability as Comparison
Market
B. Level of Trade
C. Calculation of Normal Value Based on
Comparison Market Prices
Currency Conversion
[FR Doc. 2013–18551 Filed 7–31–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation; Opportunity To Request
Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD
Operations, Customs Unit, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230,
telephone: (202) 482–4735.
AGENCY:
Background
Each year during the anniversary
month of the publication of an
antidumping or countervailing duty
order, finding, or suspended
investigation, an interested party, as
defined in section 771(9) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’),
may request, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.213, that the Department of
Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) conduct
an administrative review of that
antidumping or countervailing duty
order, finding, or suspended
investigation.
All deadlines for the submission of
comments or actions by the Department
discussed below refer to the number of
calendar days from the applicable
starting date.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Respondent Selection
In the event the Department limits the
number of respondents for individual
examination for administrative reviews
initiated pursuant to requests made for
the orders identified below, the
Department intends to select
respondents based on U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) data for U.S.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:02 Jul 31, 2013
Jkt 229001
imports during the period of review. We
intend to release the CBP data under
Administrative Protective Order
(‘‘APO’’) to all parties having an APO
within five days of publication of the
initiation notice and to make our
decision regarding respondent selection
within 21 days of publication of the
initiation Federal Register notice.
Therefore, we encourage all parties
interested in commenting on respondent
selection to submit their APO
applications on the date of publication
of the initiation notice, or as soon
thereafter as possible. The Department
invites comments regarding the CBP
data and respondent selection within
five days of placement of the CBP data
on the record of the review.
In the event the Department decides
it is necessary to limit individual
examination of respondents and
conduct respondent selection under
section 777A(c)(2) of the Act:
In general, the Department has found
that determinations concerning whether
particular companies should be
‘‘collapsed’’ (i.e., treated as a single
entity for purposes of calculating
antidumping duty rates) require a
substantial amount of detailed
information and analysis, which often
require follow-up questions and
analysis. Accordingly, the Department
will not conduct collapsing analyses at
the respondent selection phase of this
review and will not collapse companies
at the respondent selection phase unless
there has been a determination to
collapse certain companies in a
previous segment of this antidumping
proceeding (i.e., investigation,
administrative review, new shipper
review or changed circumstances
review). For any company subject to this
review, if the Department determined,
or continued to treat, that company as
collapsed with others, the Department
will assume that such companies
continue to operate in the same manner
and will collapse them for respondent
selection purposes. Otherwise, the
Department will not collapse companies
for purposes of respondent selection.
Parties are requested to (a) identify
which companies subject to review
previously were collapsed, and (b)
provide a citation to the proceeding in
which they were collapsed. Further, if
companies are requested to complete
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
46573
the Quantity and Value Questionnaire
for purposes of respondent selection, in
general each company must report
volume and value data separately for
itself. Parties should not include data
for any other party, even if they believe
they should be treated as a single entity
with that other party. If a company was
collapsed with another company or
companies in the most recently
completed segment of this proceeding
where the Department considered
collapsing that entity, complete quantity
and value data for that collapsed entity
must be submitted.
Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for
Administrative Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a
party that has requested a review may
withdraw that request within 90 days of
the date of publication of the notice of
initiation of the requested review. The
regulation provides that the Department
may extend this time if it is reasonable
to do so. In order to provide parties
additional certainty with respect to
when the Department will exercise its
discretion to extend this 90-day
deadline, interested parties are advised
that, with regard to reviews requested
on the basis of anniversary months on
or after August 2013, the Department
does not intend to extend the 90-day
deadline unless the requestor
demonstrates that an extraordinary
circumstance has prevented it from
submitting a timely withdrawal request.
Determinations by the Department to
extend the 90-day deadline will be
made on a case-by-case basis.
The Department is providing this
notice on its Web site, as well as in its
‘‘Opportunity to Request Administrative
Review’’ notices, so that interested
parties will be aware of the manner in
which the Department intends to
exercise its discretion in the future.
Opportunity To Request a Review: Not
later than the last day of August 2013,1
interested parties may request
administrative review of the following
orders, findings, or suspended
investigations, with anniversary dates in
August for the following periods:
1 Or the next business day, if the deadline falls
on a weekend, federal holiday or any other day
when the Department is closed.
E:\FR\FM\01AUN1.SGM
01AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 148 (Thursday, August 1, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46571-46573]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-18551]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-821-801]
Solid Urea From the Russian Federation: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2011-2012
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on solid urea from
the Russian Federation (Russia). The period of review (POR) is July 1,
2011, through June 30, 2012. The review covers one producer/exporter of
the subject merchandise, MCC EuroChem (EuroChem). We preliminarily find
that EuroChem has not sold subject merchandise at less than normal
value during the POR.
DATES: Effective Date: August 1, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bryan Hansen or Minoo Hatten, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 1, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
3683 or (202) 482-1690, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order is solid urea. The product is
currently classified under the Harmonized Tariff Schedules of the
United States (HTSUS) item number 3102.10.00.00. The HTSUS subheading
is provided for convenience and customs purposes. A full description of
the scope of the order is contained in the memorandum from Gary
Taverman, Senior Advisor for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, ``Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Solid Urea from the Russian
Federation'' dated concurrently with this notice (``Preliminary
Decision Memorandum''), which is hereby adopted by this notice. The
written description is dispositive.
The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on
file electronically via Import Administration's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (``IA
ACCESS''). Access to IA ACCESS is available to registered users at
https://
[[Page 46572]]
iaaccess.trade.gov and is available to all parties in the Central
Records Unit, room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly on the Internet at https://www.trade.gov/ia/. The
signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
Methodology
The Department has conducted this review in accordance with section
751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Constructed
export price is calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act.
Normal value is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act.
To determine the appropriate comparison method, the Department applied
a ``differential pricing'' analysis and has preliminarily determined to
use the average-to-average method in making comparisons of constructed
export price and normal value for EuroChem. For a full description of
the methodology underlying our conclusions, see Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
Preliminary Results of the Review
As a result of this review, we preliminarily determine that a
dumping margin of 0.00 percent exists for EuroChem for the period July
1, 2011, through June 30, 2012.
Disclosure and Public Comment
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), interested parties may submit cases
briefs not later than 30 days after the date of publication of this
notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs,
may be filed not later than five days after the date for filing case
briefs.\1\ Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this
proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement
of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of
authorities.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
\2\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(2) and (d)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a hearing, or to participate if one is requested, must submit a
written request to the Assistant Secretary for Import Administration,
filed electronically via IA ACCESS. An electronically filed document
must be received successfully in its entirety by the Department's
electronic records system, IA ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time within
30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Requests should
contain: (1) The party's name, address and telephone number; (2) the
number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed.
Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the
respective case briefs. The Department intends to issue the final
results of this administrative review, including the results of its
analysis of the issues raised in any written briefs, not later than 120
days after the date of publication of this notice, pursuant to section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
Assessment Rates
Upon completion of the administrative review, the Department shall
determine and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. If EuroChem's weighted-
average dumping margin is not zero or de minimis in the final results
of this review, we will calculate importer-specific assessment rates on
the basis of the ratio of the total amount of antidumping duties
calculated for an importer's examined sales and the total entered value
of such sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). If EuroChem's
weighted-average dumping margin continues to be zero or de minimis in
the final results of review, we will instruct CBP not to assess duties
on any of its entries in accordance with the Final Modification for
Reviews, i.e., ``{w{time} here the weighted-average margin of dumping
for the exporter is determined to be zero or de minimis, no antidumping
duties will be assessed.'' \3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102 (February 14,
2012) (Final Modification for Reviews).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department clarified its ``automatic assessment'' regulation on
May 6, 2003.\4\ This clarification will apply to entries of subject
merchandise during the POR produced by EuroChem for which it did not
know its merchandise was destined for the United States. In such
instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the
all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies)
involved in the transaction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ For a full discussion of this clarification, see Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping
Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Assessment Policy Notice).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We intend to issue instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of
the final results of this review.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for
all shipments of solid urea from Russia entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication as
provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for
EuroChem will be the rate established in the final results of this
administrative review; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated
companies not listed above, the cash deposit rate will continue to be
the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed
segment of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered
in this review, a prior review, or the original investigation but the
manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for
the manufacturer of the merchandise for the most recently completed
segment of this proceeding; (4) the cash deposit rate for all other
manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 64.93 percent, the all-
others rate established in Urea From the Union of Soviet Socialist
Republics; Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 52 FR
19557 (May 26, 1987). These cash deposit requirements, when imposed,
shall remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: July 26, 2013.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
Appendix I--List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum
Scope of the Order
Comparisons to Normal Value
A. Determination of Comparison Method
B. Results of the Differential Pricing Analysis
Product Comparisons
Date of Sale
Constructed Export Price
Normal Value
[[Page 46573]]
A. Home Market Viability as Comparison Market
B. Level of Trade
C. Calculation of Normal Value Based on Comparison Market Prices
Currency Conversion
[FR Doc. 2013-18551 Filed 7-31-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P