Deluxe Laboratories, Inc., a Division of Deluxe Entertainment Services Group, Inc., Hollywood, California; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration, 46613-46614 [2013-18491]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 148 / Thursday, August 1, 2013 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Drug Enforcement Administration Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application; Siegfried (USA), LLC Pursuant to § 1301.33(a), Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on June 10, 2013, Siegfried (USA), LLC., 33 Industrial Park Road, Pennsville, New Jersey 08070, made application by letter to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic classes of controlled substances: Drug Schedule Opium raw (9600) ........................ Poppy Straw Concentrate (9670) II II The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances in bulk for distribution to its customers. Any other such applicant, and any person who is presently registered with DEA to manufacture such substance, may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 CFR § 1301.33(a). Any such written comments or objections should be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no later than September 30, 2013. Dated: July 23, 2013. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration. [FR Doc. 2013–18338 Filed 7–31–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–09–P Hampshire (subject firm). The negative determination was issued on June 14, 2013 and the Department’s Notice of determination was published in the Federal Register on July 2, 2013 (78 FR 39774). Workers at the subject firm were engaged in activities related to the production of electrical connectors and backplane assemblies. The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination based on the Department’s findings that sales and production at the subject firm increased during that period; that there was no shift in production to a foreign country or acquisition of production from a foreign country; that imports by the subject firm have decreased; that Amphenol Backplane Systems, Nashua, New Hampshire, is neither a Supplier nor Downstream Producer to a firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2272(a); and that the workers’ firm has not been publicly identified by name by the International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an investigation resulting in an affirmative finding of serious injury, market disruption, or material injury, or threat thereof. The request for reconsideration alleges a shift in production/services to a foreign country, that the subject firm increased imports, that the subject firm experienced a loss of business with a TAA-certified firm, that the subject firm has factories in Mexico and China. The Department has carefully reviewed the request for reconsideration and the existing record, and will conduct further investigation to determine if the workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Conclusion Employment and Training Administration After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. Department of Labor’s prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted. [TA–W–82,598] mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Amphenol Backplane Systems, Nashua, New Hampshire; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration By application dated June 24, 2013, workers requested administrative reconsideration of the negative determination regarding workers’ eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers and former workers of Amphenol Backplane Systems, Nashua, New VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:02 Jul 31, 2013 Jkt 229001 Signed at Washington, DC, this 22nd day of July 2013. Del Min Amy Chen, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2013–18489 Filed 7–31–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P PO 00000 Frm 00049 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 46613 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–82,442] Deluxe Laboratories, Inc., a Division of Deluxe Entertainment Services Group, Inc., Hollywood, California; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration By application dated June 20, 2013, a state workforce official requested administrative reconsideration of the negative determination regarding workers’ eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers and former workers of Deluxe Laboratories, Inc., a division of Deluxe Entertainment Services Group, Inc., Hollywood, California (subject firm). The negative determination was issued on May 2, 2013 and the Notice of Determination was published in the Federal Register on May 24, 2013 (78 FR 31593–31596). Workers at the subject firm were engaged in activities related to the production of release and trailer prints. The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination based on the Department’s findings that with respect to Section 222(a)(2)(A)(ii) of the Act, imports of articles like or directly competitive with release and trailer prints have not increased from 2011 to 2012 or from 2012 to 2013 by the workers’ firm or customers of the workers’ firm. With respect to Section 222(a)(2)(B) of the Act, the investigation revealed that the workers’ firm did not shift the production of articles like or directly competitive with release and trailer prints to a foreign country or acquire like or directly competitive articles from a foreign country during 2011, 2012, or 2013. Rather, the investigation confirmed that the worker separations are attributable to decreased demand for movies and trailers that are printed on 35mm film. With respect to Section 222(b)(2) of the Act, the investigation revealed that Deluxe Laboratories, Inc. is not a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2272(a). Finally, the group eligibility requirements under Section 222(e) of the Act, have not been satisfied because the workers’ firm has not been publicly identified by name by the International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an investigation resulting in an affirmative finding of E:\FR\FM\01AUN1.SGM 01AUN1 46614 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 148 / Thursday, August 1, 2013 / Notices serious injury, market disruption, or material injury, or threat thereof. The request for reconsideration alleges that other products such as trailer celluloid prints in the form of digital drives, and other storage media used for digital projections, are like and directly competitive with the products produced by the workers of the subject firm. The request for reconsideration alleges that the workers’ firm shifted production to a foreign country and acquired products from a foreign country that are like and directly competitive with release and trailer prints, including the aforementioned products. The request for reconsideration also alleges that the subject firm ‘‘is a supplier and a downstream producer to Cinetech and also Technicolor, TA–W–82,166, whom received TAA certification.’’ The Department has carefully reviewed the request for reconsideration and the existing record, and will conduct further investigation to determine if the workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. Conclusion After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. Department of Labor’s prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted. Signed at Washington, DC, this 23rd day of July, 2013. Del Min Amy Chen, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2013–18491 Filed 7–31–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Investigations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance Petitions have been filed with the Secretary of Labor under Section 221(a) of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘‘the Act’’) and are identified in the Appendix to this notice. Upon receipt of these petitions, the Director of the Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, has instituted investigations pursuant to Section 221(a) of the Act. The purpose of each of the investigations is to determine whether the workers are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Title II, Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations will further relate, as appropriate, to the determination of the date on which total or partial separations began or threatened to begin and the subdivision of the firm involved. The petitioners or any other persons showing a substantial interest in the subject matter of the investigations may request a public hearing, provided such request is filed in writing with the Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, not later than August 12, 2013. Interested persons are invited to submit written comments regarding the subject matter of the investigations to the Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, not later than August 12, 2013. The petitions filed in this case are available for inspection at the Office of the Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, Room N–5428, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210. Signed at Washington, DC, this 25th day of July 2013. Michael W. Jaffe, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. APPENDIX [19 TAA petitions instituted between 7/15/13 and 7/19/13] Date of institution Date of petition TA–W Subject firm (petitioners) Location 82903 ................ Optum—United Health Group—Remote Medical Transcription/Editing Workers (State/One-Stop). Factiva, Inc/Dow Jones & Company (State/One-Stop) ........ Philips Lighting Company (Company) .................................. NIDEC Motor Corporation (State/One-Stop) ........................ Omega Engineering (State/One-Stop) ................................. Joy Global, Inc. (Union) ........................................................ Jabil (Company) ................................................................... Thermtrol MGI Global LLC (State/One-Stop) ....................... CompuCom Systems (Workers) ........................................... Flextronics Americas (State/One-Stop) ................................ Transportal (State/One-Stop) ............................................... Sealed Air Corporation (Workers) ........................................ Micron Technology—Data Center Solutions Group (Workers). Motorola Solutions, Inc. (State/One-Stop) ........................... Sensata Technologies Inc. (Company) ................................ Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc., Corporate/IT/Consumer Markets (Company). Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc., 2 Locations: Windsor, CT & Overland (Company). Cooper Interconnect (Company) .......................................... Staples Incorporated, HR Services (Workers) ..................... Minnetonka, MN .................... 07/15/13 07/12/13 Princeton, NJ ........................ Bath, NY ................................ Paragould, AR ....................... Stanford, CT .......................... Frankin, PA ........................... Tempe, AZ ............................ Cary, IL ................................. Dallas, TX ............................. Stafford, TX ........................... Charlotte, NC ........................ Duncan, SC ........................... Beaverton, OR ...................... 07/15/13 07/15/13 07/16/13 07/16/13 07/16/13 07/16/13 07/17/13 07/17/13 07/17/13 07/17/13 07/18/13 07/18/13 07/12/13 07/13/13 07/15/13 06/26/13 07/15/13 07/12/13 07/08/13 07/16/13 07/15/13 07/11/13 07/12/13 07/09/13 Louisville, KY ........................ Phoenix, AZ .......................... Simsbury, CT ........................ 07/19/13 07/19/13 07/19/13 07/18/13 07/15/13 07/18/13 ............................................... 07/19/13 07/18/13 Salem, NJ ............................. Framingham, MA .................. 07/19/13 07/19/13 07/18/13 07/18/13 82904 82905 82906 82907 82908 82909 82910 82911 82912 82913 82914 82915 ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ 82916 ................ 82917 ................ 82918 ................ mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 82919 ................ 82920 ................ 82921 ................ VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:02 Jul 31, 2013 Jkt 229001 PO 00000 Frm 00050 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\01AUN1.SGM 01AUN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 148 (Thursday, August 1, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46613-46614]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-18491]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-82,442]


Deluxe Laboratories, Inc., a Division of Deluxe Entertainment 
Services Group, Inc., Hollywood, California; Notice of Affirmative 
Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration

    By application dated June 20, 2013, a state workforce official 
requested administrative reconsideration of the negative determination 
regarding workers' eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance 
(TAA) applicable to workers and former workers of Deluxe Laboratories, 
Inc., a division of Deluxe Entertainment Services Group, Inc., 
Hollywood, California (subject firm). The negative determination was 
issued on May 2, 2013 and the Notice of Determination was published in 
the Federal Register on May 24, 2013 (78 FR 31593-31596). Workers at 
the subject firm were engaged in activities related to the production 
of release and trailer prints.
    The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination 
based on the Department's findings that with respect to Section 
222(a)(2)(A)(ii) of the Act, imports of articles like or directly 
competitive with release and trailer prints have not increased from 
2011 to 2012 or from 2012 to 2013 by the workers' firm or customers of 
the workers' firm.
    With respect to Section 222(a)(2)(B) of the Act, the investigation 
revealed that the workers' firm did not shift the production of 
articles like or directly competitive with release and trailer prints 
to a foreign country or acquire like or directly competitive articles 
from a foreign country during 2011, 2012, or 2013. Rather, the 
investigation confirmed that the worker separations are attributable to 
decreased demand for movies and trailers that are printed on 35mm film.
    With respect to Section 222(b)(2) of the Act, the investigation 
revealed that Deluxe Laboratories, Inc. is not a Supplier or Downstream 
Producer to a firm that employed a group of workers who received a 
certification of eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 
2272(a).
    Finally, the group eligibility requirements under Section 222(e) of 
the Act, have not been satisfied because the workers' firm has not been 
publicly identified by name by the International Trade Commission as a 
member of a domestic industry in an investigation resulting in an 
affirmative finding of

[[Page 46614]]

serious injury, market disruption, or material injury, or threat 
thereof.
    The request for reconsideration alleges that other products such as 
trailer celluloid prints in the form of digital drives, and other 
storage media used for digital projections, are like and directly 
competitive with the products produced by the workers of the subject 
firm. The request for reconsideration alleges that the workers' firm 
shifted production to a foreign country and acquired products from a 
foreign country that are like and directly competitive with release and 
trailer prints, including the aforementioned products. The request for 
reconsideration also alleges that the subject firm ``is a supplier and 
a downstream producer to Cinetech and also Technicolor, TA-W-82,166, 
whom received TAA certification.''
    The Department has carefully reviewed the request for 
reconsideration and the existing record, and will conduct further 
investigation to determine if the workers meet the eligibility 
requirements of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim 
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. 
Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, 
granted.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 23rd day of July, 2013.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2013-18491 Filed 7-31-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P