Polyethylene Terephthalate Film from India and Taiwan: Extension of Time Limits for Preliminary and Final Results of the Second Antidumping Duty Sunset Reviews, 45512-45513 [2013-18161]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
45512
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 145 / Monday, July 29, 2013 / Notices
submitted and, if the information is
submitted to rebut, clarify, or correct
factual information already on the
record, to provide an explanation
identifying the information already on
the record that the factual information
seeks to rebut, clarify, or correct. The
final rule also modified 19 CFR 351.301
so that, rather than providing general
time limits, there are specific time limits
based on the type of factual information
being submitted. These modifications
are effective for all proceeding segments
initiated on or after May 10, 2013, and
thus are applicable to these
investigations. Please review the final
rule, available at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/
frn/2013/1304frn/2013–08227.txt, prior
to submitting factual information in
these investigations.
Certification Requirements
Any party submitting factual
information in an AD or CVD
proceeding must certify to the accuracy
and completeness of that information.71
Parties are hereby reminded that revised
certification requirements are in effect
for company/government officials, as
well as their representatives, in all
segments of any AD or CVD proceedings
initiated on or after March 14, 2011.72
The formats for the revised certifications
are provided at the end of the Interim
Final Rule. Foreign governments and
their officials may continue to submit
certifications in either the format that
was in use prior to the effective date of
the Interim Final Rule, or in the format
provided in the Interim Final Rule.73
The Department intends to reject factual
information submissions if the
submitting party does not comply with
the revised certification requirements.
Notification to Interested Parties
Interested parties must submit
applications for disclosure under APO
in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. On
January 22, 2008, the Department
published Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Documents Submission Procedures;
APO Procedures, 73 FR 3634 (January
22, 2008). Parties wishing to participate
in these investigations should ensure
that they meet the requirements of these
procedures (e.g., the filing of letters of
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
71 See
section 782(b) of the Act.
Certification of Factual Information for
Import Administration during Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Interim Final
Rule, 76 FR 7491 (February 10, 2011) (Interim Final
Rule), amending 19 CFR 351.303(g)(1) and (2).
73 See Certification of Factual Information to
Import Administration During Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Supplemental
Interim Final Rule, 76 FR 54697 (September 2,
2011).
72 See
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:00 Jul 26, 2013
Jkt 229001
appearance as discussed at 19 CFR
351.103(d)).
This notice is issued and published
pursuant to section 777(i) of the Act.
purposes only. The written description of the
scope of the investigations is dispositive.
[FR Doc. 2013–18164 Filed 7–26–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Dated: July 22, 2013.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Appendix I
[A–533–824, A–583–837]
Scope of the Investigations
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film from
India and Taiwan: Extension of Time
Limits for Preliminary and Final
Results of the Second Antidumping
Duty Sunset Reviews
International Trade Administration
The merchandise covered by the
investigations is certain oil country tubular
goods (‘‘OCTG’’), which are hollow steel
products of circular cross-section, including
oil well casing and tubing, of iron (other than
cast iron) or steel (both carbon and alloy),
whether seamless or welded, regardless of
end finish (e.g., whether or not plain end,
threaded, or threaded and coupled) whether
or not conforming to American Petroleum
Institute (‘‘API’’) or non-API specifications,
whether finished (including limited service
OCTG products) or unfinished (including
green tubes and limited service OCTG
products), whether or not thread protectors
are attached. The scope of the investigations
also covers OCTG coupling stock.
Excluded from the scope of the
investigations are: casing or tubing
containing 10.5 percent or more by weight of
chromium; drill pipe; unattached couplings;
and unattached thread protectors.
The merchandise subject to the
investigations is currently classified in the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United
States (‘‘HTSUS’’) under item numbers:
7304.29.10.10, 7304.29.10.20, 7304.29.10.30,
7304.29.10.40, 7304.29.10.50, 7304.29.10.60,
7304.29.10.80, 7304.29.20.10, 7304.29.20.20,
7304.29.20.30, 7304.29.20.40, 7304.29.20.50,
7304.29.20.60, 7304.29.20.80, 7304.29.31.10,
7304.29.31.20, 7304.29.31.30, 7304.29.31.40,
7304.29.31.50, 7304.29.31.60, 7304.29.31.80,
7304.29.41.10, 7304.29.41.20, 7304.29.41.30,
7304.29.41.40, 7304.29.41.50, 7304.29.41.60,
7304.29.41.80, 7304.29.50.15, 7304.29.50.30,
7304.29.50.45, 7304.29.50.60, 7304.29.50.75,
7304.29.61.15, 7304.29.61.30, 7304.29.61.45,
7304.29.61.60, 7304.29.61.75, 7305.20.20.00,
7305.20.40.00, 7305.20.60.00, 7305.20.80.00,
7306.29.10.30, 7306.29.10.90, 7306.29.20.00,
7306.29.31.00, 7306.29.41.00, 7306.29.60.10,
7306.29.60.50, 7306.29.81.10, and
7306.29.81.50.
The merchandise subject to the
investigations may also enter under the
following HTSUS item numbers:
7304.39.00.24, 7304.39.00.28, 7304.39.00.32,
7304.39.00.36, 7304.39.00.40, 7304.39.00.44,
7304.39.00.48, 7304.39.00.52, 7304.39.00.56,
7304.39.00.62, 7304.39.00.68, 7304.39.00.72,
7304.39.00.76, 7304.39.00.80, 7304.59.60.00,
7304.59.80.15, 7304.59.80.20, 7304.59.80.25,
7304.59.80.30, 7304.59.80.35, 7304.59.80.40,
7304.59.80.45, 7304.59.80.50, 7304.59.80.55,
7304.59.80.60, 7304.59.80.65, 7304.59.80.70,
7304.59.80.80, 7305.31.40.00, 7305.31.60.90,
7306.30.50.55, 7306.30.50.90, 7306.50.50.50,
and 7306.50.50.70.
The HTSUS subheadings above are
provided for convenience and customs
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: July 29, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jun
Jack Zhao or Jacky Arrowsmith at 202–
482–1396 or 202–482–5255,
respectively, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 6, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230.
AGENCY:
Background
On April 2, 2013, the Department of
Commerce (the Department) initiated
the second sunset reviews of the
antidumping duty (AD) orders on
polyethylene terephthalate film (PET
Film) from India and Taiwan, pursuant
to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act). See
Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’)
Review, 78 FR 19647 (April 2, 2013).
Within the deadline specified in 19 CFR
351.218(d)(1)(i), the Department
received notices of intent to participate,
in both sunset reviews, on behalf of
DuPont Teijin Films, Mitsubishi
Polyester Film, Inc., and SKC, Inc.
(collectively, domestic interested
parties). Each claimed interested party
status under section 771(9)(C) of the
Act, as a producer of domestic like
product. The Department received
timely substantive responses from these
domestic interested parties. On April
22, 2013, after analyzing the substantive
responses of interested parties,
consistent with 19 CFR
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(A), the Department
determined to conduct expedited sunset
reviews of these AD orders on the basis
that no respondent interested party
submitted a substantive response in
either review. See Letter to Catherine
DeFilippo, Director, Office of
Investigations, International Trade
Commission, regarding ‘‘Sunset Reviews
Initiated on April 2, 2013,’’ (April 22,
2013).
E:\FR\FM\29JYN1.SGM
29JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 145 / Monday, July 29, 2013 / Notices
On February 14, 2012, the Department
published in the Federal Register a
notice entitled Antidumping
Proceedings: Calculation of the
Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain
Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final
Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14,
2012) (Final Modification for Reviews).
In that notice, the Department
announced the modification of its
methodology regarding the calculation
of the weighted-average dumping
margins in certain segments of
antidumping duty proceedings and
stated that it would apply to all sunset
reviews for which preliminary or final
results were due more than 60 days after
publication (i.e., April 16, 2012). On
July 22, 2013, the Department
reconsidered its determination to
conduct expedited sunset reviews of
these orders and determined to conduct
full sunset reviews of the AD orders on
PET Film from India and Taiwan.1 The
preliminary results of these full sunset
reviews are currently due July 22, 2013 2
and the final results are due November
27, 2013.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Extension Of Time Limits
In accordance with section
751(c)(5)(B) of the Act, the Department
may extend the period of time for
making its determination by not more
than 90 days, if it determines that the
sunset review is extraordinarily
complicated. We determine that these
AD sunset reviews are extraordinarily
complicated, pursuant to section
751(c)(5)(C)(i) and (ii) of the Act,
because of the need to consider the
effect of the Final Modification for
Reviews on the determinations the
Department must make with regard to
both the likelihood of dumping to
continue or recur and the magnitude of
the margin of dumping to prevail if the
orders were revoked. See Adequacy
Redetermination Memorandum.
Accordingly, the Department is
extending the deadlines for both the
preliminary and final results of these
full sunset reviews by 90 days. As a
result, the Department intends to issue
1 See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, from Mark
Hoadley, Acting Director, Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, Office 6, regarding
‘‘Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders
on Polyethylene Terephthalate Film from India and
Taiwan: Adequacy Redetermination
Memorandum,’’ (July 22, 2013).
2 As the actual due date of July 20, 2013 falls on
a Saturday, the preliminary results are due the next
business day, i.e., July 22, 2013. See Notice of
Clarification: Application of ‘‘Next Business Day’’
Rule for Administrative Determination Deadlines
Pursuant to Tariff Act of 1930, As Amended, 70 FR
24533 (May 10, 2005).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:00 Jul 26, 2013
Jkt 229001
45513
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
* Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
* Mail: Federal Docket Management
System Office, 4800 Mark Center Drive,
East Tower, 2nd Floor, Suite 02G09,
Alexandria, VA 22350–3100.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number for this Federal Register
document. The general policy for
comments and other submissions from
members of the public is to make these
submissions available for public
viewing on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
Office of the Secretary
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
the preliminary results of these full
sunset reviews of the AD orders on PET
Film from India and Taiwan no later
than October 18, 2013, and the final
results of the reviews no later than
February 25, 2014.
This notice is issued in accordance
with sections 751(c)(5)(B) and (C) of the
Act.
Dated: July 22, 2013.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2013–18161 Filed 7–26–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
[Docket ID: DoD–2013–OS–0168]
Privacy Act of 1974; Computer
Matching Program
Defense Manpower Data Center
(DMDC), DoD.
ACTION: Notice of a Computer Matching
Program.
AGENCY:
Subsection (e)(12) of the
Privacy Act of 1974, as amended (5
U.S.C. 552a), requires agencies to
publish advanced notices of any
proposed or revised computer matching
program by the matching agency for
public comment. The Department of
Defense (DoD), as the matching agency
under the Privacy Act of 1974, as
amended, is hereby giving notice to the
record subjects of a computer matching
program between the DoD and the
Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) acting on behalf of the
State Public Assistance Agencies
(SPAA). The purpose of the computer
matching program is to exchange
personal data for purposes of identifying
individuals who are receiving Federal
compensation or pension payments and
also are receiving payments pursuant to
Federal benefit programs being
administered by the States.
DATES: This proposed action will
become effective August 28, 2013 and
matching may commence unless
changes to the matching program are
required due to public comments or by
Congressional or by Office of
Management and Budget objections.
Any public comment must be received
before the effective date.
Comments must be received before
August 28, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and title,
by any of the following methods:
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Samuel P. Jenkins at (703) 571–0070.
Pursuant
to subsection (o) of the Privacy Act of
1974, as amended (5 U.S.C. 552a), the
HHS and DMDC have concluded an
agreement to conduct a computer
matching program between agencies.
The purpose of the computer matching
program is to exchange personal data for
purposes of identifying individuals who
are receiving Federal compensation or
pension payments and also are receiving
payments pursuant to Federal benefit
programs being administered by the
States.
The parties to this agreement have
determined that a computer matching
program is the most efficient,
expeditious, and effective means of
obtaining and processing the
information needed by the SPAAs to
identify individuals who may be
ineligible for public assistance benefits.
The principal alternative to using a
computer matching program for
identifying such individuals would be
to conduct a manual comparison of all
Federal personnel records with SPAA
records of those individuals currently
receiving public assistance under a
Federal benefit program being
administered by the State. Conducting a
manual match, however, would clearly
impose a considerable administrative
burden, constitute a greater intrusion of
the individual’s privacy, and would
result in additional delay in
determining eligibility and, if
applicable, the eventual recovery of any
outstanding debts.
A copy of the computer matching
agreement between HHS and DoD is
available upon request. Requests should
be submitted to the address captioned
above or to the Director, Office of
Financial Services Office of
Administration, 370 L’Enfant Prmenade
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\29JYN1.SGM
29JYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 145 (Monday, July 29, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45512-45513]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-18161]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-533-824, A-583-837]
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film from India and Taiwan: Extension
of Time Limits for Preliminary and Final Results of the Second
Antidumping Duty Sunset Reviews
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: July 29, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jun Jack Zhao or Jacky Arrowsmith at
202-482-1396 or 202-482-5255, respectively, AD/CVD Operations, Office
6, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230.
Background
On April 2, 2013, the Department of Commerce (the Department)
initiated the second sunset reviews of the antidumping duty (AD) orders
on polyethylene terephthalate film (PET Film) from India and Taiwan,
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act). See Initiation of Five-Year (``Sunset'') Review, 78 FR 19647
(April 2, 2013). Within the deadline specified in 19 CFR
351.218(d)(1)(i), the Department received notices of intent to
participate, in both sunset reviews, on behalf of DuPont Teijin Films,
Mitsubishi Polyester Film, Inc., and SKC, Inc. (collectively, domestic
interested parties). Each claimed interested party status under section
771(9)(C) of the Act, as a producer of domestic like product. The
Department received timely substantive responses from these domestic
interested parties. On April 22, 2013, after analyzing the substantive
responses of interested parties, consistent with 19 CFR
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(A), the Department determined to conduct expedited
sunset reviews of these AD orders on the basis that no respondent
interested party submitted a substantive response in either review. See
Letter to Catherine DeFilippo, Director, Office of Investigations,
International Trade Commission, regarding ``Sunset Reviews Initiated on
April 2, 2013,'' (April 22, 2013).
[[Page 45513]]
On February 14, 2012, the Department published in the Federal
Register a notice entitled Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the
Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain
Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February
14, 2012) (Final Modification for Reviews). In that notice, the
Department announced the modification of its methodology regarding the
calculation of the weighted-average dumping margins in certain segments
of antidumping duty proceedings and stated that it would apply to all
sunset reviews for which preliminary or final results were due more
than 60 days after publication (i.e., April 16, 2012). On July 22,
2013, the Department reconsidered its determination to conduct
expedited sunset reviews of these orders and determined to conduct full
sunset reviews of the AD orders on PET Film from India and Taiwan.\1\
The preliminary results of these full sunset reviews are currently due
July 22, 2013 \2\ and the final results are due November 27, 2013.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, from
Mark Hoadley, Acting Director, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, Office 6, regarding ``Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping
Duty Orders on Polyethylene Terephthalate Film from India and
Taiwan: Adequacy Redetermination Memorandum,'' (July 22, 2013).
\2\ As the actual due date of July 20, 2013 falls on a Saturday,
the preliminary results are due the next business day, i.e., July
22, 2013. See Notice of Clarification: Application of ``Next
Business Day'' Rule for Administrative Determination Deadlines
Pursuant to Tariff Act of 1930, As Amended, 70 FR 24533 (May 10,
2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Extension Of Time Limits
In accordance with section 751(c)(5)(B) of the Act, the Department
may extend the period of time for making its determination by not more
than 90 days, if it determines that the sunset review is
extraordinarily complicated. We determine that these AD sunset reviews
are extraordinarily complicated, pursuant to section 751(c)(5)(C)(i)
and (ii) of the Act, because of the need to consider the effect of the
Final Modification for Reviews on the determinations the Department
must make with regard to both the likelihood of dumping to continue or
recur and the magnitude of the margin of dumping to prevail if the
orders were revoked. See Adequacy Redetermination Memorandum.
Accordingly, the Department is extending the deadlines for both the
preliminary and final results of these full sunset reviews by 90 days.
As a result, the Department intends to issue the preliminary results of
these full sunset reviews of the AD orders on PET Film from India and
Taiwan no later than October 18, 2013, and the final results of the
reviews no later than February 25, 2014.
This notice is issued in accordance with sections 751(c)(5)(B) and
(C) of the Act.
Dated: July 22, 2013.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2013-18161 Filed 7-26-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
