Reports, Forms and Record Keeping Requirements; Agency Information Collection Activity Under OMB Review, 44620-44621 [2013-17679]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
44620
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 24, 2013 / Notices
The ATSTWG also wishes to
emphasize that the authorized instructor
ACS is not intended to be a stand-alone
document. Rather, it is intended to be
used in conjunction with the pilot
certificate level or rating ACS for which
the instructor-applicant seeks
authorization to provide instruction.
Therefore, in addition to mastery of the
knowledge and skills defined in the
authorized instructor ACS, the
instructor-applicant must demonstrate
instructional competence for Tasks in
the ACS for the appropriate certificate
level or rating, to include analyzing and
correcting common learner errors.
The ATSTWG continues work to
complete its remaining assignments.
These include developing a detailed
proposal to realign and, as appropriate,
streamline and consolidate existing
FAA guidance material (e.g.,
handbooks) with each integrated ACS
document; and to propose
methodologies to ensure that knowledge
test item bank questions are consistent
with both the ACS documents and the
test question development principles set
forth in the ARC’s recommendations.
The ACS documents are designed as
the foundation for transitioning to a
more integrated and systematic
approach to airman certification testing
and training. To accomplish this
objective and achieve its overall safety
goals, the ACS documents support the
safety management system (SMS)
framework. SMS methodology provides
a systematic approach to achieving
acceptable levels of safety risk. The
ATSTWG is constructing ACS,
associated guidance, and test item bank
question components of the airman
certification system around the four
functional components of SMS:
• Safety Policy that demonstrates
FAA senior management commitment to
continually improve safety through
enhancements to the airman
certification testing and training system;
specifically, better integration of the
aeronautical knowledge, flight
proficiency, and risk management
components of the airman certification
system;
• Safety Risk Management processes
that create a structured means of safety
risk management decision making to
identify, assess, and determine
acceptable level of risk associated with
regulatory changes, safety
recommendations, or other factors
requiring modification of airman testing
and training materials;
• Safety Assurance processes which
allow increased confidence on the part
of industry and FAA stakeholders in
risk controls through a continual review
of FAA products and the systematic,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:35 Jul 23, 2013
Jkt 229001
prompt and appropriate incorporation
of changes arising from new regulations,
data analysis, and safety
recommendations; and
• Safety Promotion framework to
support a positive safety culture in the
form of training and ongoing
engagement with both external
stakeholders (e.g., the aviation training
industry) and FAA policy divisions.
Time permitting, and given the
foundational nature of the ACS
documents and their importance in the
ongoing evolution of the FAA’s airman
certification testing and training system,
the ATSTWG wishes to make
subsequent revised draft ACS
documents for the private pilot
certificate and the instrument rating,
and of its current initial draft of the
authorized instructor ACS, available to
the public for one additional period of
review and comment before it completes
its work in September 2013. The
ATSTWG would use the comments it
receives to complete its work on this
project and to develop its final report
and recommendations.
Issued in Washington, DC on July 19, 2013.
Lirio Liu,
Designated Federal Officer, Aviation
Rulemaking Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2013–17782 Filed 7–23–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2013–0045]
Reports, Forms and Record Keeping
Requirements; Agency Information
Collection Activity Under OMB Review
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice
announces that the Information
Collection Request (ICR) abstracted
below will be forwarded to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and comment. The ICR describes
the nature of the information collection
and its expected burden. The Federal
Register Notice with a 60-day comment
period was published on April 18, 2013
(78 FR 23330). No comments were
received.
Comments: Comments should be
directed to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, 725 17th
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Street NW., Washington, DC 20503,
Attention NHTSA Desk Officer.
Type of Request: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Form Number: This collection of
information uses no standard forms.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before August 23, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Piazza, National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, Office of the Chief
Counsel (NCC–111), (202) 366–9511,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
Title: Criminal Penalty Safe Harbor
Provision.
OMB Control Number: 2127–0609.
Frequency: We believe that there will
be very few criminal prosecutions under
49 U.S.C. 30170, given the lack of
prosecutions under the statute to date.
Accordingly, it is not likely to be a
substantial motivating force for a
submission of a corrected report in
response to an agency request for
information. See Summary of the
Collection of Information below. Based
on our experience to date, we estimate
that no more than one (1) person per
year would be subject to this collection
of information, and we do not anticipate
receiving more than one report a year
from any particular person.
Affected Public: This collection of
information would apply to any person
who seeks a ‘‘safe harbor’’ from
potential criminal liability under 49
U.S.C. 30170. Thus, the collection of
information could apply to the
manufacturers, any officers or
employees thereof, and other persons
who respond or have a duty to respond
to an information provision requirement
pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30166 or a
regulation, requirement, request or order
issued thereunder.
Abstract: NHTSA has published a
final rule related to ‘‘reasonable time’’
and sufficient manner of ‘‘correction,’’
as they apply to the safe harbor from
criminal penalties, as required by
Section 5 of the Transportation Recall
Enhancement, Accountability, and
Documentation (TREAD) Act (Pub. L.
106–414), which was enacted on
November 1, 2000. 65 FR 38380 (July
24, 2001).
Estimated Annual Burden: Using the
above estimate of one (1) affected person
a year, with an estimated two (2) hours
of preparation to collect and provide the
information, at an assumed rate of
$26.70 an hour, the annual, estimated
cost of collecting and preparing the
E:\FR\FM\24JYN1.SGM
24JYN1
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 24, 2013 / Notices
information necessary for one complete
‘‘safe harbor’’ correction is $53.40.
Adding in a postage cost of $0.46 (one
report at a cost of 46 cents to mail each
one), we estimate that it will cost $53.86
a year for persons to prepare and submit
the information necessary to satisfy the
safe harbor provision of 49 U.S.C.
30170.
Since nothing in this rule would
require those persons who submit
reports pursuant to this rule to keep
copies of any records or reports
submitted to us, the cost imposed to
keep records would be zero hours and
zero costs.
Number of Respondents: We estimate
that there will be no more than one per
year.
Summary of the Collection of
Information: Any person seeking
protection from criminal liability under
49 U.S.C. 30170 related to an improper
report or failure to report pursuant to 49
U.S.C. 30166, or a regulation,
requirement, request or order issued
thereunder, is and will be required to
report the following information to
NHTSA: (1) Each previous improper
item of information or document and
each failure to report that was required
under 49 U.S.C. 30166, or a regulation,
requirement, request or order issued
thereunder, (2) the specific predicate
under which each improper or omitted
report should have been provided, and
(3) the complete and correct reports,
including all information that was
improperly submitted or that should
have been submitted and all relevant
documents that were not previously
submitted to NHTSA or, if the person
cannot provide this, then a full detailed
description of that information or of the
content of those documents and the
reason why the individual cannot
provide them to NHTSA.
ADDRESSES: Send comments, within 30
days, to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, 725 17th
Street NW., Washington, DC 20503,
Attention NHTSA Desk Officer.
Comments are invited on: Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the Department,
including whether the information will
have practical utility; the accuracy of
the Department’s estimate of the burden
of the proposed information collection;
ways to enhance the quality, utility and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:35 Jul 23, 2013
Jkt 229001
A Comment to OMB is most effective if
OMB receives it within 30 days of
publication.
Issued in Washington, DC under
authority delegated in 49 CFR 1.95.
O. Kevin Vincent,
Chief Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2013–17679 Filed 7–23–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2013–0034]
Notice of Receipt of Petition for
Decision that Nonconforming 2004
BMW 760I Passenger Cars are Eligible
for Importation
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of receipt of petition.
AGENCY:
This document announces
receipt by the National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA) of a
petition for a decision that
nonconforming 2004 BMW 760I
passenger cars that were not originally
manufactured to comply with all
applicable Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standards (FMVSS) are eligible for
importation into the United States
because they are substantially similar to
vehicles that were originally
manufactured for sale in the United
States and that were certified by their
manufacturer as complying with the
safety standards (the U.S.-certified
version of the 2004 BMW 760I
passenger car) and they are capable of
being readily altered to conform to the
standards.
DATE: The closing date for comments on
the petition is August 23, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to
the docket and notice numbers above
and be submitted by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility:
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET, Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
Instructions: Comments must be
written in the English language, and be
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
44621
no greater than 15 pages in length,
although there is no limit to the length
of necessary attachments to the
comments. If comments are submitted
in hard copy form, please ensure that
two copies are provided. If you wish to
receive confirmation that your
comments were received, please enclose
a stamped, self-addressed postcard with
the comments. Note that all comments
received will be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided.
Please see the Privacy Act heading
below.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78).
How to Read Comments submitted to
the Docket: You may read the comments
received by Docket Management at the
address and times given above. You may
also view the documents from the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for
accessing the dockets. The docket ID
number and title of this notice are
shown at the heading of this document
notice. Please note that even after the
comment closing date, we will continue
to file relevant information in the
Docket as it becomes available. Further,
some people may submit late comments.
Accordingly, we recommend that you
periodically search the Docket for new
material.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Coleman Sachs, Office of Vehicle Safety
Compliance, NHTSA (202–366–3151).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A), a
motor vehicle that was not originally
manufactured to conform to all
applicable FMVSS shall be refused
admission into the United States unless
NHTSA has decided that the motor
vehicle is substantially similar to a
motor vehicle originally manufactured
for importation into and sale in the
United States, certified under 49 U.S.C.
§ 30115, and of the same model year as
the model of the motor vehicle to be
compared, and is capable of being
readily altered to conform to all
applicable FMVSS.
Petitions for eligibility decisions may
be submitted by either manufacturers or
importers who have registered with
E:\FR\FM\24JYN1.SGM
24JYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 142 (Wednesday, July 24, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44620-44621]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-17679]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-2013-0045]
Reports, Forms and Record Keeping Requirements; Agency
Information Collection Activity Under OMB Review
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice announces that the Information
Collection Request (ICR) abstracted below will be forwarded to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and comment. The ICR
describes the nature of the information collection and its expected
burden. The Federal Register Notice with a 60-day comment period was
published on April 18, 2013 (78 FR 23330). No comments were received.
Comments: Comments should be directed to the Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th
Street NW., Washington, DC 20503, Attention NHTSA Desk Officer.
Type of Request: Extension of a currently approved collection.
Form Number: This collection of information uses no standard forms.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before August 23, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Piazza, National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, Office of the Chief Counsel (NCC-111), (202)
366-9511, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Title: Criminal Penalty Safe Harbor Provision.
OMB Control Number: 2127-0609.
Frequency: We believe that there will be very few criminal
prosecutions under 49 U.S.C. 30170, given the lack of prosecutions
under the statute to date. Accordingly, it is not likely to be a
substantial motivating force for a submission of a corrected report in
response to an agency request for information. See Summary of the
Collection of Information below. Based on our experience to date, we
estimate that no more than one (1) person per year would be subject to
this collection of information, and we do not anticipate receiving more
than one report a year from any particular person.
Affected Public: This collection of information would apply to any
person who seeks a ``safe harbor'' from potential criminal liability
under 49 U.S.C. 30170. Thus, the collection of information could apply
to the manufacturers, any officers or employees thereof, and other
persons who respond or have a duty to respond to an information
provision requirement pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30166 or a regulation,
requirement, request or order issued thereunder.
Abstract: NHTSA has published a final rule related to ``reasonable
time'' and sufficient manner of ``correction,'' as they apply to the
safe harbor from criminal penalties, as required by Section 5 of the
Transportation Recall Enhancement, Accountability, and Documentation
(TREAD) Act (Pub. L. 106-414), which was enacted on November 1, 2000.
65 FR 38380 (July 24, 2001).
Estimated Annual Burden: Using the above estimate of one (1)
affected person a year, with an estimated two (2) hours of preparation
to collect and provide the information, at an assumed rate of $26.70 an
hour, the annual, estimated cost of collecting and preparing the
[[Page 44621]]
information necessary for one complete ``safe harbor'' correction is
$53.40. Adding in a postage cost of $0.46 (one report at a cost of 46
cents to mail each one), we estimate that it will cost $53.86 a year
for persons to prepare and submit the information necessary to satisfy
the safe harbor provision of 49 U.S.C. 30170.
Since nothing in this rule would require those persons who submit
reports pursuant to this rule to keep copies of any records or reports
submitted to us, the cost imposed to keep records would be zero hours
and zero costs.
Number of Respondents: We estimate that there will be no more than
one per year.
Summary of the Collection of Information: Any person seeking
protection from criminal liability under 49 U.S.C. 30170 related to an
improper report or failure to report pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30166, or a
regulation, requirement, request or order issued thereunder, is and
will be required to report the following information to NHTSA: (1) Each
previous improper item of information or document and each failure to
report that was required under 49 U.S.C. 30166, or a regulation,
requirement, request or order issued thereunder, (2) the specific
predicate under which each improper or omitted report should have been
provided, and (3) the complete and correct reports, including all
information that was improperly submitted or that should have been
submitted and all relevant documents that were not previously submitted
to NHTSA or, if the person cannot provide this, then a full detailed
description of that information or of the content of those documents
and the reason why the individual cannot provide them to NHTSA.
ADDRESSES: Send comments, within 30 days, to the Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th
Street NW., Washington, DC 20503, Attention NHTSA Desk Officer.
Comments are invited on: Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Department, including whether the information will have practical
utility; the accuracy of the Department's estimate of the burden of the
proposed information collection; ways to enhance the quality, utility
and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to minimize
the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including
the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology. A Comment to OMB is most effective if OMB
receives it within 30 days of publication.
Issued in Washington, DC under authority delegated in 49 CFR 1.95.
O. Kevin Vincent,
Chief Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2013-17679 Filed 7-23-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
