Proposed Collection, Comment Request, 44160-44162 [2013-17578]
Download as PDF
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
44160
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 141 / Tuesday, July 23, 2013 / Notices
for possible future revisions of the EO
List.
The commenter also requested that
Indian garments be removed from the
EO List because a survey by the
Government of India’s National Sample
Survey Organization found a significant
reduction in child labor in India in
recent years. While this survey appears
to show an overall reduction in child
labor in India, it does not address
whether there has been a corresponding
reduction in forced or indentured child
labor, which is the subject of the EO
List. Likewise, the survey does not
address whether the generalized
reduction has had an impact on child
labor in the garment industry, or
whether the reduction is primarily in
other sectors.
This commenter argued that any use
of forced child labor in garments
produced for the Indian market, rather
than for export, should not be
considered for purposes of the EO List.
The commenter pointed to third-party
certification programs as evidence that
forced child labor does not exist in
export-oriented garment factories, and
claimed that the sources used to place
garments on the EO List are ‘‘not
applicable’’ to the export side of the
industry. EO 13126 requires that goods
are placed on the EO List if there is a
reasonable basis to believe that forced
child labor might have been used in the
industry and country in question.
Whether such labor is occurring in
production of goods destined for export
or domestic markets is not taken into
consideration. Governments and other
stakeholders have a responsibility to
address forced child labor wherever it
occurs.
The commenter asserted that Indian
garments were placed on the EO List
because yarn produced in the garment
supply chain may have been made with
forced or indentured child labor. This
comment appears to misunderstand the
sources in the bibliography. Every
source for Indian garments discusses the
use of forced or indentured child labor
in the production of garments, and
inclusion of Indian garments on the EO
List was not based on activity in the
supply chain.
The commenter argued that the
instances of forced child labor identified
in the sources are not representative of
the garment industry in India as a
whole. In conducting research on forced
child labor in the production of goods,
DOL, DOS and DHS consider whether
the available information suggests that
the forced or indentured child labor
documented is more than an isolated
incident. In the case of Indian garments,
the sources document the practice of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:40 Jul 22, 2013
Jkt 229001
forced child labor occurring in various
locations. Corroborated sources point to
a proliferation of home-based work and
small, un-registered production units
that perform outsourced work such as
printing and dyeing, where child labor
is prevalent. Many of these children are
migrants working to repay advances
given to their parents, an indicator of
forced labor. Many of these children
work long hours under poor conditions,
are subject to verbal and physical abuse,
and their freedom of movement is
severely restricted—another indicator of
forced labor. These sources are
corroborated by other credible sources,
giving the three agencies a reasonable
basis to believe that the use of forced
child labor in the garment industry is
more than isolated.
The commenter expressed the view
that some of the sources are unreliable.
In placing garments from India on the
EO List, DOL, DOS and DHS relied
upon sources whose methodologies,
prior publications, degree of familiarity
and experience with international labor
standards, and/or reputation for
accuracy and objectivity were found to
be relevant and probative. Individual
sources are corroborated by other
evidence in the bibliography and should
not be viewed in isolation. Taken as a
whole, the bibliography which includes
studies conducted by Verite, Inc., the
Fair Labor Association, and the
University of Manchester Chronic
Poverty Research Centre, is sufficient to
provide the three agencies a reasonable
basis to believe that forced child labor
might be used in the production of
Indian garments.
Finally, the commenter noted that it
did not have access to two of the
sources cited for Indian garments,
namely interviews with certain key
informants. DOL will provide copies of
those interviews to the commenter
following the publication of this final
notice. All of DOL’s sources are publicly
available from DOL upon request and/
or from the original author.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 15th day of
July, 2013.
Carol Pier,
Acting Deputy Undersecretary, Bureau of
International Labor Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2013–17520 Filed 7–22–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–28–P
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Proposed Collection, Comment
Request
ACTION:
Notice.
The Department of Labor, as
part of its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent burden,
conducts a pre-clearance consultation
program to provide the general public
and Federal agencies with an
opportunity to comment on proposed
and/or continuing collections of
information in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c) (2)(A)]. This
program helps to ensure that requested
data can be provided in the desired
format, reporting burden (time and
financial resources) is minimized,
collection instruments are clearly
understood, and the impact of collection
requirements on respondents can be
properly assessed. The Bureau of Labor
Statistics (BLS) is soliciting comments
concerning the proposed revision of the
Annual Refiling Survey (ARS). A copy
of the proposed information collection
request (ICR) can be obtained by
contacting the individual listed below
in the ADDRESSES section of this notice.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted to the office listed in the
Addresses section of this notice on or
before September 23, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Carol
Rowan, BLS Clearance Officer, Division
of Management Systems, Bureau of
Labor Statistics, Room 4080, 2
Massachusetts Avenue NE.,
Washington, DC 20212. Written
comments also may be transmitted by
fax to 202–691–5111 (this is not a toll
free number).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carol Rowan, BLS Clearance Officer,
202–691–7628 (this is not a toll free
number). (See Addresses section.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
The Quarterly Census of Employment
and Wages (QCEW) program is a
Federal/State cooperative effort which
compiles monthly employment data,
quarterly wages data, and business
identification information from
employers subject to State
Unemployment Insurance (UI) laws.
These data are collected from State
Quarterly Contribution Reports (QCRs)
submitted to State Workforce Agencies
(SWAs). The States send micro-level
employment and wages data,
supplemented with the names,
E:\FR\FM\23JYN1.SGM
23JYN1
44161
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 141 / Tuesday, July 23, 2013 / Notices
addresses, and business identification
information of these employers, to the
BLS. The State micro-level data files are
used to create the BLS sampling frame,
known as the longitudinal QCEW data.
To ensure the continued accuracy of
these data, the information supplied by
employers must be periodically verified
and updated. For this purpose, the
Annual Refiling Survey (ARS) is used in
conjunction with the UI tax reporting
system in each State. The information
collected on the ARS is used to review
the existing industry code assigned to
each establishment as well as the
physical location of the business
establishment. As a result, changes in
the industrial and geographical
compositions of our economy are
captured in a timely manner and
reflected in the BLS statistical programs.
The ARS also asks employers to
identify new locations in the State. If
these employers meet QCEW program
reporting criteria, then a Multiple
Worksite Report (MWR) is sent to the
employer requesting employment and
wages for each worksite each quarter.
Thus, the ARS is also used to identify
new potential MWR-eligible employers.
II. Current Action
Office of Management and Budget
clearance is being sought for a revision
of the ARS. While the primary purpose
of the ARS is to verify or to correct the
North American Industry Classification
System (NAICS) code assigned to
establishments, there are other
important purposes of the ARS. The
ARS seeks accurate mailing and
physical location addresses of
establishments as well as geographical
codes such as county and township
(independent city, parish, or island in
some States). The BLS and the Census
Bureau signed a Memorandum of
Understanding in 2012 to share selected
business data on multi-location
companies. Both the BLS and the
Census Bureau compile and maintain
censuses of business establishments in
the United States that contain economic
and administrative data for nearly all
businesses in the United States. A key
aspect of data quality is that businesses
include accurate NAICS and geographic
categorizations. Both agencies have
reviewed each other’s business lists and
have identified information that can
improve the quality and comparability
of these data. Specifically, information
from the ARS will be used to verify
NAICS codes independently and to
provide these to the Census Bureau to
improve data quality and reduce costs
and respondent burden through
increased data sharing.
Once every three years, the SWAs
survey employers that are covered by
the State’s UI laws to ensure that State
records correctly reflect the business
activities and locations of those
employers. The QCEW program sends
an ARS form to approximately one-third
of businesses each year, surveying the
entire universe of covered businesses
over a three-year cycle. The selection
criterion for surveying establishments is
based on the nine-digit Federal
Employer Identification Number of the
respondent.
The ARS remains largely a mail
survey, although steps have been taken
to reduce the amount of paperwork
involved in responding to the survey.
For example, BLS staff review selected,
large multi-worksite national employers
rather than surveying these employers
with traditional ARS forms. This central
review reduces postage costs incurred in
sending ARS forms. It also reduces
respondent burden, as the selected
employers do not have to submit ARS
forms.
Single-worksite employers have been
identified as potential users of the BLS
Touchtone Response System (TRS).
Employers can use the TRS if they meet
certain conditions and there are no
changes to specific data elements based
upon the employer’s review. The TRS
reduces respondent burden because it is
quick, free, and convenient. It also
allows respondents to help BLS reduce
survey costs because they do not return
the form in the business reply envelope
provided. All States are using the TRS
in conducting the ARS.
Total
respondents
Form number
Frequency
Building on the success of the TRS,
the BLS added online reporting options
for the ARS. Respondents have the
option to provide their information via
a secure Web site. Respondents are still
able to mail their returns if they so
desire or they can use the TRS if eligible
and if they have no changes to report.
Finally, BLS continues to use a
private contractor to handle various
administrative aspects of the survey to
reduce the costs associated with the
ARS. This initiative is called the
Contracted Annual Refiling Survey
(CARS). Under CARS, BLS effectively
utilizes the commercial advantages
related to printing, stuffing, and mailing
large volumes of survey forms.
III. Desired Focus of Comments
The Bureau of Labor Statistics is
particularly interested in comments
that:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility.
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used.
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected.
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submissions of responses.
Type of Review: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Agency: Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Title: Annual Refiling Survey (ARS).
OMB Number: 1220–0032.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit institutions, not-for-profit
institutions, and farms.
Frequency: Annually.
Total
responses
Average time per
response
Total burden
(hours)
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
BLS 3023–(NVS) ............................................................
BLS 3023–(NVM) ............................................................
BLS 3023–(NCA) ............................................................
1,407,614
39,483
158,818
Once ...............
Once ...............
Once ...............
1,407,614
39,483
158,818
5 minutes ..........
15 minutes ........
10 minutes ........
117,301
9,871
26,470
Totals: ......................................................................
1,605,915
.........................
1,605,915
...........................
153,642
Total Burden Cost (Capital/Startup):
$0.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:40 Jul 22, 2013
Jkt 229001
Total Burden Cost (Operating/
Maintenance): $0.
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for Office of
E:\FR\FM\23JYN1.SGM
23JYN1
44162
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 141 / Tuesday, July 23, 2013 / Notices
Management and Budget approval of the
information collection request; they also
will become a matter of public record.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 17th day of
July, 2013.
Kimberley Hill,
Chief, Division of Management Systems,
Bureau of Labor Statistics.
[FR Doc. 2013–17578 Filed 7–22–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–24–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
[Docket No. OSHA–2013–0006]
Advisory Committee on Construction
Safety and Health (ACCSH)
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Announcement of a meeting of
ACCSH.
AGENCY:
ACCSH will meet August 22–
23, 2013, in Washington, DC.
DATES:
ACCSH meeting: ACCSH will meet
from 10:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m., E.T.,
Thursday, August 22, 2013, and Friday,
August 23, 2013.
Written comments, requests to speak,
speaker presentations, and requests for
special accommodation: You must
submit (postmark, send, transmit)
comments, requests to address the
ACCSH meeting, speaker presentations
(written or electronic), and requests for
special accommodations for the ACCSH
meeting by August 15, 2013.
ADDRESSES: ACCSH meeting: ACCSH
will meet in Room C–5515, 1A–B, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210.
Submission of comments, requests to
speak, and speaker presentations: You
may submit comments, requests to
speak at the ACCSH meeting, and
speaker presentations using one of the
following methods:
Electronically: You may submit
materials, including attachments,
electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov, which is the
Federal eRulemaking Portal. Follow the
on-line instructions for submissions.
Facsimile (Fax): If your submission,
including attachments, does not exceed
10 pages, you may fax it to the OSHA
Docket Office at (202) 693–1648.
Regular mail, express mail, hand
delivery, or messenger (courier) service:
You may submit your materials to the
OSHA Docket Office, Docket No.
OSHA–2013–0006, Room N–2625, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:40 Jul 22, 2013
Jkt 229001
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210;
telephone (202) 693–2350 (TTY (877)
889–5627). OSHA’s Docket Office
accepts deliveries (hand deliveries,
express mail, and messenger service)
during normal business hours, 8:15
a.m.–4:45 p.m., E.T., weekdays.
Requests for special accommodations:
Please submit your request for special
accommodations to attend the ACCSH
meeting to Ms. Frances Owens, OSHA,
Office of Communications, Room N–
3647, U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20210; telephone (202) 693–1999;
email owens.frances@dol.gov.
Instructions: Your submissions must
include the agency name and docket
number for this Federal Register notice
(Docket No. OSHA–2013–0006). Due to
security-related procedures,
submissions by regular mail may
experience significant delays. Please
contact the OSHA Docket Office for
information about security procedures
for making submissions. For additional
information on submitting comments,
requests to speak, and speaker
presentations, see the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this notice.
OSHA will post comments, requests
to speak, and speaker presentations,
including any personal information you
provide, without change, at https://
www.regulations.gov. Therefore, OSHA
cautions you about submitting personal
information such as Social Security
numbers and birthdates.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
For press inquiries: Mr. Frank
Meilinger, Director, OSHA Office of
Communications, Room N–3647, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210;
telephone (202) 693–1999; email
meilinger.francis2@dol.gov.
For general information about ACCSH
and ACCSH meetings: Mr. Damon
Bonneau, OSHA, Directorate of
Construction, Room N–3468, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210;
telephone (202) 693–2020; email
bonneau.damon@dol.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ACCSH Meeting
ACCSH will meet August 22–23,
2013, in Washington, DC. Some ACCSH
members will attend the meeting by
teleconference. The meeting is open to
the public.
ACCSH advises the Secretary of Labor
and Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health
(Assistant Secretary) in the formulation
of standards affecting the construction
industry, and on policy matters arising
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
in the administration of the safety and
health provisions under the Contract
Work Hours and Safety Standards Act
(Construction Safety Act (CSA)) (40
U.S.C. 3701 et seq.) and the
Occupational Safety and Health Act of
1970 (29 U.S.C. 651 et seq.) (see also 29
CFR 1911.10 and 1912.3). In addition,
the OSH Act and CSA require that
OSHA consult with ACCSH before the
Agency proposes any occupational
safety and health standard affecting
construction activities (29 CFR 1911.10;
40 U.S.C. 3704).
The tentative agenda for this meeting
includes:
• Assistant Secretary’s Agency update
and remarks;
• Directorate of Construction update
on rulemaking projects;
• National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health (NIOSH) update;
• Discussion of OSHA’s Temporary
Worker initiatives;
• Discussion of the 2-hour
introduction to the OSHA 10-hour and
30-hour training courses;
• ACCSH’s consideration of, and
recommendations on, the following
OSHA proposed rules affecting
construction activities:
Æ The following 12 items from the
proposed Standards Improvement
Project IV:
—Replace the definitions of ‘‘employee’’
and ‘‘employer’’ in 29 CFR 1926.32
with the definitions of those terms
found in 29 CFR 1910.2;
—Correct and reformat table at 29 CFR
1926.55 (Threshold Limit Values)
for clarity and consistency with its
counterpart in the general industry
standard at 29 CFR 1910.1000;
—Standardize break-strength
requirements for lanyards and
lifelines throughout the
construction and general industry
standards of 29 CFR parts 1910 and
1926;
—Clarify the excavation requirements at
29 CFR 1926.651(j)(1) and (2)—
keeping loose rock and soil, and
equipment and materials, away
from the edge of excavations;
—Update the 29 CFR 1926.50
requirement to post emergency
medical contact information in
locations without 911 emergency
services;
—Replace the 29 CFR 1926.64
requirements for process safety
management of highly hazardous
chemicals with a cross reference to
the general industry regulations at
29 CFR 1910.119;
—Replace the outdated 29 CFR subpart
W (Rollover Protective Structures;
Overhead Protection) requirements
E:\FR\FM\23JYN1.SGM
23JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 141 (Tuesday, July 23, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44160-44162]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-17578]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Proposed Collection, Comment Request
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Labor, as part of its continuing effort to
reduce paperwork and respondent burden, conducts a pre-clearance
consultation program to provide the general public and Federal agencies
with an opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing
collections of information in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c) (2)(A)]. This program helps to
ensure that requested data can be provided in the desired format,
reporting burden (time and financial resources) is minimized,
collection instruments are clearly understood, and the impact of
collection requirements on respondents can be properly assessed. The
Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) is soliciting comments concerning the
proposed revision of the Annual Refiling Survey (ARS). A copy of the
proposed information collection request (ICR) can be obtained by
contacting the individual listed below in the ADDRESSES section of this
notice.
DATES: Written comments must be submitted to the office listed in the
Addresses section of this notice on or before September 23, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Carol Rowan, BLS Clearance Officer,
Division of Management Systems, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Room 4080,
2 Massachusetts Avenue NE., Washington, DC 20212. Written comments also
may be transmitted by fax to 202-691-5111 (this is not a toll free
number).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carol Rowan, BLS Clearance Officer,
202-691-7628 (this is not a toll free number). (See Addresses section.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) program is a
Federal/State cooperative effort which compiles monthly employment
data, quarterly wages data, and business identification information
from employers subject to State Unemployment Insurance (UI) laws. These
data are collected from State Quarterly Contribution Reports (QCRs)
submitted to State Workforce Agencies (SWAs). The States send micro-
level employment and wages data, supplemented with the names,
[[Page 44161]]
addresses, and business identification information of these employers,
to the BLS. The State micro-level data files are used to create the BLS
sampling frame, known as the longitudinal QCEW data.
To ensure the continued accuracy of these data, the information
supplied by employers must be periodically verified and updated. For
this purpose, the Annual Refiling Survey (ARS) is used in conjunction
with the UI tax reporting system in each State. The information
collected on the ARS is used to review the existing industry code
assigned to each establishment as well as the physical location of the
business establishment. As a result, changes in the industrial and
geographical compositions of our economy are captured in a timely
manner and reflected in the BLS statistical programs.
The ARS also asks employers to identify new locations in the State.
If these employers meet QCEW program reporting criteria, then a
Multiple Worksite Report (MWR) is sent to the employer requesting
employment and wages for each worksite each quarter. Thus, the ARS is
also used to identify new potential MWR-eligible employers.
II. Current Action
Office of Management and Budget clearance is being sought for a
revision of the ARS. While the primary purpose of the ARS is to verify
or to correct the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS)
code assigned to establishments, there are other important purposes of
the ARS. The ARS seeks accurate mailing and physical location addresses
of establishments as well as geographical codes such as county and
township (independent city, parish, or island in some States). The BLS
and the Census Bureau signed a Memorandum of Understanding in 2012 to
share selected business data on multi-location companies. Both the BLS
and the Census Bureau compile and maintain censuses of business
establishments in the United States that contain economic and
administrative data for nearly all businesses in the United States. A
key aspect of data quality is that businesses include accurate NAICS
and geographic categorizations. Both agencies have reviewed each
other's business lists and have identified information that can improve
the quality and comparability of these data. Specifically, information
from the ARS will be used to verify NAICS codes independently and to
provide these to the Census Bureau to improve data quality and reduce
costs and respondent burden through increased data sharing.
Once every three years, the SWAs survey employers that are covered
by the State's UI laws to ensure that State records correctly reflect
the business activities and locations of those employers. The QCEW
program sends an ARS form to approximately one-third of businesses each
year, surveying the entire universe of covered businesses over a three-
year cycle. The selection criterion for surveying establishments is
based on the nine-digit Federal Employer Identification Number of the
respondent.
The ARS remains largely a mail survey, although steps have been
taken to reduce the amount of paperwork involved in responding to the
survey. For example, BLS staff review selected, large multi-worksite
national employers rather than surveying these employers with
traditional ARS forms. This central review reduces postage costs
incurred in sending ARS forms. It also reduces respondent burden, as
the selected employers do not have to submit ARS forms.
Single-worksite employers have been identified as potential users
of the BLS Touchtone Response System (TRS). Employers can use the TRS
if they meet certain conditions and there are no changes to specific
data elements based upon the employer's review. The TRS reduces
respondent burden because it is quick, free, and convenient. It also
allows respondents to help BLS reduce survey costs because they do not
return the form in the business reply envelope provided. All States are
using the TRS in conducting the ARS.
Building on the success of the TRS, the BLS added online reporting
options for the ARS. Respondents have the option to provide their
information via a secure Web site. Respondents are still able to mail
their returns if they so desire or they can use the TRS if eligible and
if they have no changes to report.
Finally, BLS continues to use a private contractor to handle
various administrative aspects of the survey to reduce the costs
associated with the ARS. This initiative is called the Contracted
Annual Refiling Survey (CARS). Under CARS, BLS effectively utilizes the
commercial advantages related to printing, stuffing, and mailing large
volumes of survey forms.
III. Desired Focus of Comments
The Bureau of Labor Statistics is particularly interested in
comments that:
Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility.
Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used.
Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected.
Minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other collection techniques or other forms
of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submissions of
responses.
Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection.
Agency: Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Title: Annual Refiling Survey (ARS).
OMB Number: 1220-0032.
Affected Public: Business or other for-profit institutions, not-
for-profit institutions, and farms.
Frequency: Annually.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Total Average time Total burden
Form number respondents Frequency responses per response (hours)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BLS 3023-(NVS)............... 1,407,614 Once............ 1,407,614 5 minutes...... 117,301
BLS 3023-(NVM)............... 39,483 Once............ 39,483 15 minutes..... 9,871
BLS 3023-(NCA)............... 158,818 Once............ 158,818 10 minutes..... 26,470
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Totals:.................. 1,605,915 ................ 1,605,915 ............... 153,642
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Burden Cost (Capital/Startup): $0.
Total Burden Cost (Operating/Maintenance): $0.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized
and/or included in the request for Office of
[[Page 44162]]
Management and Budget approval of the information collection request;
they also will become a matter of public record.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 17th day of July, 2013.
Kimberley Hill,
Chief, Division of Management Systems, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
[FR Doc. 2013-17578 Filed 7-22-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-24-P