Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of China: Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2010-2011, 42930-42932 [2013-17259]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
42930
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 138 / Thursday, July 18, 2013 / Notices
The components and materials
sourced from abroad include: polymer
paint, label materials, logo materials,
packaging materials, plastic packing,
plastic bags, plastic trim pieces and
switch covers, rubber spacers, plastic
items, rubber gaskets, gaskets, rubber
washers, rubber stoppers, rubber
grommets, other rubber articles, cartons,
bags, corrugated boxes with fillers,
instruction sheets, range hood filters,
bathroom mirrors, filters for whole
house ventilation systems, cold-rolled
steel for manufacturing, flat-rolled steel
for manufacturing, plated wire, housing
for recessed range hood, wire mesh for
bird screens, roof/wall caps, screws,
fasteners, stainless steel screws, nuts,
washers, rivet housing assembly,
damper or filter springs for grille,
stainless steel kitchen backsplashes,
brackets, aluminum stainless for
manufacturing, zinc screws, parts of
hinges, hinge cabinets, mounting
brackets, brackets, metal flex ducts,
ceiling exhaust or paddle fans, wall or
ceiling exhaust fans, residential range
hood canopies, parts used in
ventilation, filters, parts of filters,
central valve dampers, roller down
drafts, electric motors for exhaust/
ventilation, electric motors for
downdraft range hoods, parts used on
electric motors, light ballasts,
transformers, magnets for range hoods,
portable heaters and fans, heating
resistors, parts for heaters, capacitors,
ceramic capacitors, resistors, fuses,
circuit breakers for exhaust/heater units,
relays, motor starters, wall switches,
various switch types, lamp sockets,
other electrical parts, switch parts,
male/female connectors, terminals for
switches, other apparatus for switches,
printed circuit boards, membrane covers
for switches, halogen light bulbs, light
bulbs, fluorescent light bulbs, light
housing for range hoods, light diodes,
coaxial cables, wire harnesses, cable
wires, fuse holders, snap bushing
(damper), air pressure switch valves,
thermostat/heat sensor for ventilation,
heat regulator/dehumidistat, timer
switch assembly, timer control switch
assembly, metal housing medicine
cabinets, wood trimmed medicine
cabinets, plastic housing medicine
cabinets, wood components for
medicine cabinets, metal components
for cabinets, light kits for fans with base
metal, non-base metal light fittings, base
metal parts for light kits, parts for light
kits, glass globes and other parts of
lamps (finials) (duty rate ranges from
free to 12%).
Public comment is invited from
interested parties. Submissions shall be
addressed to the Board’s Executive
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:20 Jul 17, 2013
Jkt 229001
Secretary at the address below. The
closing period for their receipt is August
27, 2013.
A copy of the notification will be
available for public inspection at the
Office of the Executive Secretary,
Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room
21013, U.S. Department of Commerce,
1401 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230–0002, and in the
‘‘Reading Room’’ section of the Board’s
Web site, which is accessible via
www.trade.gov/ftz.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Whiteman at Elizabeth.
Whiteman@trade.gov or (202) 482–0473.
Dated: July 11, 2013.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–17261 Filed 7–17–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[B–74–2013]
Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 114—Peoria,
Illinois; Notification of Proposed
Production Activity, Easton-Bell
Sports, Inc. (Sports Equipment),
Rantoul, Illinois
Easton-Bell Sports, Inc. (Easton-Bell
Sports) submitted a notification of
proposed production activity to the FTZ
Board for its facility in Rantoul, Illinois
within FTZ 114. The notification
conforming to the requirements of the
regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR
400.22) was received on June 27, 2013.
A separate application for subzone
status at the Easton-Bell Sports facility
was submitted and is being processed
under Section 400.31 of the Board’s
regulations (Doc. B–32–2013). The
facility is used for the assembly and
distribution of safety helmets, baby seats
for bicycles and bicycle car carrier
racks. Pursuant to 15 CFR 400.14(b),
FTZ activity would be limited to the
specific foreign-status materials and
components and specific finished
products described in the submitted
notification (as described below) and
subsequently authorized by the FTZ
Board.
Production under FTZ procedures
could exempt Easton-Bell Sports from
customs duty payments on the foreign
status components used in export
production. On its domestic sales,
Easton-Bell Sports would be able to
choose the duty rates during customs
entry procedures that apply to bicycle,
motorcycle, football and baseball
helmets; bicycle baby seats; and, bicycle
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
car carrier racks (duty rate ranges from
free to 2.5%) for the foreign status
inputs noted below. Customs duties also
could possibly be deferred or reduced
on foreign status production equipment.
The components and materials
sourced from abroad include: tape,
stickers, plastic bags, stoppers, water
bottles, plastic helmet parts, rubber
grommets, textile bags, boxes, labels,
header cards, manuals, webbing for
helmets, helmets, helmet pads, screws,
washers, helmet parts, buckles, bike
carrier parts, bike parts and baby seat
parts (duty rate ranges from free to
17.6%). The request indicates that
textile bags (classified under HTSUS
Subheading 4202.92) will be admitted to
the zone in privileged foreign status (19
CFR 146.41), thereby precluding
inverted tariff benefits on such items.
Public comment is invited from
interested parties. Submissions shall be
addressed to the Board’s Executive
Secretary at the address below. The
closing period for their receipt is August
27, 2013.
A copy of the notification will be
available for public inspection at the
Office of the Executive Secretary,
Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room
21013, U.S. Department of Commerce,
1401 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230–0002, and in the
‘‘Reading Room’’ section of the Board’s
Web site, which is accessible via
www.trade.gov/ftz.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Whiteman at Elizabeth.
Whiteman@trade.gov or (202) 482–0473.
Dated: July 12, 2013.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–17264 Filed 7–17–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–900]
Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof
From the People’s Republic of China:
Amended Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2010–2011
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is amending the final
results of the administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on diamond
sawblades and parts thereof (diamond
sawblades) from the People’s Republic
of China (the PRC) to correct a
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\18JYN1.SGM
18JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 138 / Thursday, July 18, 2013 / Notices
ministerial error.1 The period of review
(POR) is November 1, 2010, through
October 31, 2011.
DATES: Effective Date: June 17, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Yang Jin Chun, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 1, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–5760.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 11, 2013, and June 13, 2013,
the Department disclosed to interested
parties its calculations for the Final
Results. On June 17, 2013, Weihai
Xiangguang Mechanical Industrial Co.,
Ltd. (Weihai) filed a ministerial error
allegation. On June 24, 2013, the
petitioner, Diamond Sawblades
Manufacturers Coalition, filed
comments in response to Weihai’s
ministerial error allegation.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order
is diamond sawblades. The diamond
sawblades subject to the order are
currently classifiable under subheadings
8202 to 8206 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS),
and may also enter under 6804.21.00.
The HTSUS subheadings are provided
for convenience and customs purposes.
A full description of the scope of the
order is contained in the decision
memorandum dated concurrently with,
and hereby adopted by, this amended
final.2 The written description is
dispositive.
Ministerial Error
Section 751(h) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR
351.224(f) define a ‘‘ministerial error’’ as
an error ‘‘in addition, subtraction, or
other arithmetic function, clerical error
resulting from inaccurate copying,
duplication, or the like, and any similar
type of unintentional error which the
Secretary considers ministerial.’’ After
analyzing Weihai’s ministerial error
allegation, we have determined, in
accordance with section 751(h) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e), that we
made a ministerial error in our
calculations, having unintentionally
incorporated certain factor-ofproduction variables from a
subsequently-revised database into the
Final Results for Weihei.
In accordance with section 751(h) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e), we are
amending the Final Results of this
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on diamond
sawblades from the PRC. The revised
weighted-average dumping margins are
listed below. For a detailed discussion,
see Decision Memorandum for
Amended Final.
Rate for Non-Selected Separate-Rate
Recipients
As a result of the correction of the
ministerial error, both respondents
selected for individual examination
have a dumping margin of zero
percent.3 Consistent with section
735(c)(5)(B) of the Act, and because all
prior rates for this proceeding were
calculated using a methodology the
Department abandoned in its Final
Modification for Reviews pursuant to
section 123 of the Uruguay Round
Agreements Act,4 the Department’s
prior decisions in administrative
reviews involving similar
circumstances,5 we find that a
reasonable method for determining the
weighted-average dumping margins for
the non-selected respondents in the
amended final results of this
administrative review is to average the
weighted-average dumping margins
calculated for the selected respondents.
Consequently, the rate established for
the non-selected separate rate
respondents is 0.00 percent. For a
detailed discussion, see Decision
Memorandum for Amended Final.
Amended Final Results of the Review
The amended weighted-average
dumping margins for the administrative
review are as follows:
Company 6
Margin (percent)
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Bosun Tools Co., Ltd.
Chengdu Huifeng Diamond Tools Co., Ltd .........................................................................................................................
Danyang Huachang Diamond Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd .............................................................................................
Danyang NYCL Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd ....................................................................................................................
Danyang Weiwang Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd ...............................................................................................................
Guilin Tebon Superhard Material Co., Ltd ..........................................................................................................................
Hangzhou Deer King Industrial & Trading Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................
Hebei Husqvarna-Jikai Diamond Tools Co., Ltd .................................................................................................................
Huzhou Gu’s Import & Export Co., Ltd ...............................................................................................................................
Jiangsu Fengtai Diamond Tool Manufacture Co., Ltd ........................................................................................................
Jiangsu Inter-China Group Corporation ..............................................................................................................................
Jiangsu Youhe Tool Manufacturer Co., Ltd ........................................................................................................................
Quanzhou Zhongzhi Diamond Tool Co. Ltd ........................................................................................................................
Rizhao Hein Saw Co., Ltd ...................................................................................................................................................
Saint-Gobain Abrasives (Shanghai) Co., Ltd ......................................................................................................................
Shanghai Robtol Tool Manufacturing Co., Ltd ....................................................................................................................
Weihai Xiangguang Mechanical Industrial Co., Ltd 7 ..........................................................................................................
Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Co. ......................................................................................................................
Xiamen ZL Diamond Technology Co., Ltd ..........................................................................................................................
Zhejiang Wanli Tools Group Co., Ltd ..................................................................................................................................
1 See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof
From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2010–
2011, 78 FR 36166 (June 17, 2013) (Final Results).
2 See Memorandum entitled, ‘‘Decision
Memorandum for Amended Final Results of the
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review:
Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the
People’s Republic of China covering the Period
November 1, 2010, through October 31, 2011,’’
(Decision Memorandum for Amended Final).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:20 Jul 17, 2013
Jkt 229001
3 See Final Results, 78 FR at 36167, and the
Amended Final Results of the Review section
below.
4 See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of
the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty
Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101
(February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for
Reviews).
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
42931
Sfmt 4703
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5 See, e.g., Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof From
France, Germany, and Italy: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews and
Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Reviews in Part, 77 FR 33159 (June 5, 2012),
unchanged in Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof From
France, Germany, and Italy: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews; 2010–
2011, 77 FR 73415 (December 10, 2012).
E:\FR\FM\18JYN1.SGM
18JYN1
42932
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 138 / Thursday, July 18, 2013 / Notices
Disclosure
We will disclose the calculation
memorandum used in our analysis to
parties to this proceeding within five
days of the date of the publication of
this notice pursuant to 19 CFR
351.224(b).
Assessment
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the
Department shall determine, and U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries in accordance with
the amended final results of this review.
In accordance with the Final
Modification for Reviews,8 we will
instruct CBP to liquidate entries by the
firms listed above without regard to
antidumping duties.
On October 24, 2011, the Department
announced a refinement to its
assessment practice in NME cases.9
Pursuant to this refinement in practice,
for entries that were not reported in the
U.S. sales databases submitted by
Weihai, the Department will instruct
CBP to liquidate such entries at the
PRC-wide rate.
We intend to issue assessment
instructions to CBP 15 days after the
date of publication of the amended final
results of review.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective
retroactively on any entries made on or
after June 17, 2013, the date of
publication of the Final Results, for all
shipments of the subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption as provided by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For subject
merchandise exported by the companies
listed above that have separate rates, the
cash deposit rate will be the rate
established in this amended final results
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
6 During
this segment of the proceeding, we
identified certain name variations for several
companies. See Diamond Sawblades and Parts
Thereof From the People’s Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review: 2010–11, 77 FR 73417,
73418–49, and accompanying Preliminary Decision
Memorandum at 14, unchanged in Final Results.
7 Weihai exported some of the subject
merchandise to the United States through its
Korean parent company, Ehwa Diamond Industrial
Co., Ltd. See, e.g., Weihai’s March 23, 2012, section
A response at 1–2.
8 See Antidumping Proceeding: Calculation of the
Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty
Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101
(February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for
Reviews).
9 For a full discussion of this practice, see NonMarket Economy Antidumping Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694
(October 24, 2011).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:20 Jul 17, 2013
Jkt 229001
of review for each exporter as listed
above; (2) for previously investigated or
reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters
not listed above that received a separate
rate in a prior segment of this
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the exporter-specific rate;
(3) for all PRC exporters of subject
merchandise that have not been found
to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash
deposit rate will be that for the PRCwide entity; (4) for all non-PRC
exporters of subject merchandise which
have not received their own rate, the
cash deposit rate will be the rate
applicable to the PRC exporter that
supplied that non-PRC exporter. These
deposit requirements shall remain in
effect until further notice.
Notification
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Secretary’s presumption
that reimbursement of the antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping
duties.
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
These amended final results of review
are issued and published in accordance
with sections 751(h) and 777(i)(1) of the
Act.
Dated: July 11, 2013.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013–17259 Filed 7–17–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
PO 00000
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–827]
Certain Cased Pencils From the
People’s Republic of China: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review and
Determination To Revoke Order In
Part; 2010–2011
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On January 11, 2013, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary
results of the antidumping duty
administrative review of certain cased
pencils (pencils) from the People’s
Republic of China (PRC). The period of
review (POR) is December 1, 2010,
through November 30, 2011. The review
covers one exporter of subject
merchandise, Beijing Fila Dixon
Stationery Company, Ltd. a/k/a Beijing
Dixon Ticonderoga Stationery
Company, Ltd., a/k/a Beijing Dixon
Stationery Company, Ltd., and Dixon
Ticonderoga Company (collectively,
Dixon). For the final results, we find
that Dixon did not make sales of the
subject merchandise at less than normal
value. Furthermore, the Department is
revoking the antidumping duty order in
part with respect to Dixon.
DATES: Effective Date: July 18, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Kolberg or Sergio Balbontin, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 1, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone (202) 482–1785 or (202) 482–
6478, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On January 11, 2013, the Department
published the preliminary results of the
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on pencils from
the PRC.1 On January 31, 2013, the
Department received comments from
Dixon concerning the Department’s
selection of the surrogate country and
the surrogate values used in the
Preliminary Results. The Department
conducted verification of Dixon’s sales
and factors of production responses
from April 8, 2013, through April 10,
1 See Certain Cased Pencils From the People’s
Republic of China: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and
Intent Not To Revoke Order In Part; 2010–2011, 78
FR 2363 (January 11, 2013) (Preliminary Results).
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\18JYN1.SGM
18JYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 138 (Thursday, July 18, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42930-42932]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-17259]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-900]
Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of
China: Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review;
2010-2011
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is amending the
final results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty
order on diamond sawblades and parts thereof (diamond sawblades) from
the People's Republic of China (the PRC) to correct a
[[Page 42931]]
ministerial error.\1\ The period of review (POR) is November 1, 2010,
through October 31, 2011.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People's
Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2010-2011, 78 FR 36166 (June 17, 2013) (Final Results).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: June 17, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Yang Jin Chun, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 1, Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5760.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 11, 2013, and June 13, 2013, the Department disclosed to
interested parties its calculations for the Final Results. On June 17,
2013, Weihai Xiangguang Mechanical Industrial Co., Ltd. (Weihai) filed
a ministerial error allegation. On June 24, 2013, the petitioner,
Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers Coalition, filed comments in response
to Weihai's ministerial error allegation.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order is diamond sawblades. The
diamond sawblades subject to the order are currently classifiable under
subheadings 8202 to 8206 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS), and may also enter under 6804.21.00. The HTSUS
subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes. A full
description of the scope of the order is contained in the decision
memorandum dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this amended
final.\2\ The written description is dispositive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Memorandum entitled, ``Decision Memorandum for Amended
Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Diamond
Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People's Republic of China
covering the Period November 1, 2010, through October 31, 2011,''
(Decision Memorandum for Amended Final).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ministerial Error
Section 751(h) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and
19 CFR 351.224(f) define a ``ministerial error'' as an error ``in
addition, subtraction, or other arithmetic function, clerical error
resulting from inaccurate copying, duplication, or the like, and any
similar type of unintentional error which the Secretary considers
ministerial.'' After analyzing Weihai's ministerial error allegation,
we have determined, in accordance with section 751(h) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.224(e), that we made a ministerial error in our calculations,
having unintentionally incorporated certain factor-of-production
variables from a subsequently-revised database into the Final Results
for Weihei.
In accordance with section 751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e),
we are amending the Final Results of this administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on diamond sawblades from the PRC. The revised
weighted-average dumping margins are listed below. For a detailed
discussion, see Decision Memorandum for Amended Final.
Rate for Non-Selected Separate-Rate Recipients
As a result of the correction of the ministerial error, both
respondents selected for individual examination have a dumping margin
of zero percent.\3\ Consistent with section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act,
and because all prior rates for this proceeding were calculated using a
methodology the Department abandoned in its Final Modification for
Reviews pursuant to section 123 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act,\4\
the Department's prior decisions in administrative reviews involving
similar circumstances,\5\ we find that a reasonable method for
determining the weighted-average dumping margins for the non-selected
respondents in the amended final results of this administrative review
is to average the weighted-average dumping margins calculated for the
selected respondents. Consequently, the rate established for the non-
selected separate rate respondents is 0.00 percent. For a detailed
discussion, see Decision Memorandum for Amended Final.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Final Results, 78 FR at 36167, and the Amended Final
Results of the Review section below.
\4\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012)
(Final Modification for Reviews).
\5\ See, e.g., Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof From France,
Germany, and Italy: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Reviews and Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Reviews in Part, 77 FR 33159 (June 5, 2012),
unchanged in Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof From France, Germany,
and Italy: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews;
2010-2011, 77 FR 73415 (December 10, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amended Final Results of the Review
The amended weighted-average dumping margins for the administrative
review are as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Company \6\ Margin (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bosun Tools Co., Ltd...........................
Chengdu Huifeng Diamond Tools Co., Ltd......... 0.00
Danyang Huachang Diamond Tools Manufacturing 0.00
Co., Ltd......................................
Danyang NYCL Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd...... 0.00
Danyang Weiwang Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd... 0.00
Guilin Tebon Superhard Material Co., Ltd....... 0.00
Hangzhou Deer King Industrial & Trading Co., 0.00
Ltd...........................................
Hebei Husqvarna-Jikai Diamond Tools Co., Ltd... 0.00
Huzhou Gu's Import & Export Co., Ltd........... 0.00
Jiangsu Fengtai Diamond Tool Manufacture Co., 0.00
Ltd...........................................
Jiangsu Inter-China Group Corporation.......... 0.00
Jiangsu Youhe Tool Manufacturer Co., Ltd....... 0.00
Quanzhou Zhongzhi Diamond Tool Co. Ltd......... 0.00
Rizhao Hein Saw Co., Ltd....................... 0.00
Saint-Gobain Abrasives (Shanghai) Co., Ltd..... 0.00
Shanghai Robtol Tool Manufacturing Co., Ltd.... 0.00
Weihai Xiangguang Mechanical Industrial Co., 0.00
Ltd \7\.......................................
Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Co........... 0.00
Xiamen ZL Diamond Technology Co., Ltd.......... 0.00
Zhejiang Wanli Tools Group Co., Ltd............ 0.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 42932]]
Disclosure
We will disclose the calculation memorandum used in our analysis to
parties to this proceeding within five days of the date of the
publication of this notice pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ During this segment of the proceeding, we identified certain
name variations for several companies. See Diamond Sawblades and
Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: 2010-11, 77 FR
73417, 73418-49, and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum at
14, unchanged in Final Results.
\7\ Weihai exported some of the subject merchandise to the
United States through its Korean parent company, Ehwa Diamond
Industrial Co., Ltd. See, e.g., Weihai's March 23, 2012, section A
response at 1-2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b),
the Department shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries in
accordance with the amended final results of this review. In accordance
with the Final Modification for Reviews,\8\ we will instruct CBP to
liquidate entries by the firms listed above without regard to
antidumping duties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Antidumping Proceeding: Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012)
(Final Modification for Reviews).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On October 24, 2011, the Department announced a refinement to its
assessment practice in NME cases.\9\ Pursuant to this refinement in
practice, for entries that were not reported in the U.S. sales
databases submitted by Weihai, the Department will instruct CBP to
liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide rate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Non-Market
Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties,
76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We intend to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the
date of publication of the amended final results of review.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective
retroactively on any entries made on or after June 17, 2013, the date
of publication of the Final Results, for all shipments of the subject
merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption as
provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For subject
merchandise exported by the companies listed above that have separate
rates, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established in this
amended final results of review for each exporter as listed above; (2)
for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters not
listed above that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-
specific rate; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that
have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit
rate will be that for the PRC-wide entity; (4) for all non-PRC
exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own
rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC
exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit
requirements shall remain in effect until further notice.
Notification
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of the antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable
violation.
These amended final results of review are issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(h) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: July 11, 2013.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013-17259 Filed 7-17-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
