Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of China: Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2010-2011, 42930-42932 [2013-17259]

Download as PDF TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 42930 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 138 / Thursday, July 18, 2013 / Notices The components and materials sourced from abroad include: polymer paint, label materials, logo materials, packaging materials, plastic packing, plastic bags, plastic trim pieces and switch covers, rubber spacers, plastic items, rubber gaskets, gaskets, rubber washers, rubber stoppers, rubber grommets, other rubber articles, cartons, bags, corrugated boxes with fillers, instruction sheets, range hood filters, bathroom mirrors, filters for whole house ventilation systems, cold-rolled steel for manufacturing, flat-rolled steel for manufacturing, plated wire, housing for recessed range hood, wire mesh for bird screens, roof/wall caps, screws, fasteners, stainless steel screws, nuts, washers, rivet housing assembly, damper or filter springs for grille, stainless steel kitchen backsplashes, brackets, aluminum stainless for manufacturing, zinc screws, parts of hinges, hinge cabinets, mounting brackets, brackets, metal flex ducts, ceiling exhaust or paddle fans, wall or ceiling exhaust fans, residential range hood canopies, parts used in ventilation, filters, parts of filters, central valve dampers, roller down drafts, electric motors for exhaust/ ventilation, electric motors for downdraft range hoods, parts used on electric motors, light ballasts, transformers, magnets for range hoods, portable heaters and fans, heating resistors, parts for heaters, capacitors, ceramic capacitors, resistors, fuses, circuit breakers for exhaust/heater units, relays, motor starters, wall switches, various switch types, lamp sockets, other electrical parts, switch parts, male/female connectors, terminals for switches, other apparatus for switches, printed circuit boards, membrane covers for switches, halogen light bulbs, light bulbs, fluorescent light bulbs, light housing for range hoods, light diodes, coaxial cables, wire harnesses, cable wires, fuse holders, snap bushing (damper), air pressure switch valves, thermostat/heat sensor for ventilation, heat regulator/dehumidistat, timer switch assembly, timer control switch assembly, metal housing medicine cabinets, wood trimmed medicine cabinets, plastic housing medicine cabinets, wood components for medicine cabinets, metal components for cabinets, light kits for fans with base metal, non-base metal light fittings, base metal parts for light kits, parts for light kits, glass globes and other parts of lamps (finials) (duty rate ranges from free to 12%). Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions shall be addressed to the Board’s Executive VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:20 Jul 17, 2013 Jkt 229001 Secretary at the address below. The closing period for their receipt is August 27, 2013. A copy of the notification will be available for public inspection at the Office of the Executive Secretary, Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room 21013, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230–0002, and in the ‘‘Reading Room’’ section of the Board’s Web site, which is accessible via www.trade.gov/ftz. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Whiteman at Elizabeth. Whiteman@trade.gov or (202) 482–0473. Dated: July 11, 2013. Andrew McGilvray, Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. 2013–17261 Filed 7–17–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Foreign-Trade Zones Board [B–74–2013] Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 114—Peoria, Illinois; Notification of Proposed Production Activity, Easton-Bell Sports, Inc. (Sports Equipment), Rantoul, Illinois Easton-Bell Sports, Inc. (Easton-Bell Sports) submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility in Rantoul, Illinois within FTZ 114. The notification conforming to the requirements of the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR 400.22) was received on June 27, 2013. A separate application for subzone status at the Easton-Bell Sports facility was submitted and is being processed under Section 400.31 of the Board’s regulations (Doc. B–32–2013). The facility is used for the assembly and distribution of safety helmets, baby seats for bicycles and bicycle car carrier racks. Pursuant to 15 CFR 400.14(b), FTZ activity would be limited to the specific foreign-status materials and components and specific finished products described in the submitted notification (as described below) and subsequently authorized by the FTZ Board. Production under FTZ procedures could exempt Easton-Bell Sports from customs duty payments on the foreign status components used in export production. On its domestic sales, Easton-Bell Sports would be able to choose the duty rates during customs entry procedures that apply to bicycle, motorcycle, football and baseball helmets; bicycle baby seats; and, bicycle PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 car carrier racks (duty rate ranges from free to 2.5%) for the foreign status inputs noted below. Customs duties also could possibly be deferred or reduced on foreign status production equipment. The components and materials sourced from abroad include: tape, stickers, plastic bags, stoppers, water bottles, plastic helmet parts, rubber grommets, textile bags, boxes, labels, header cards, manuals, webbing for helmets, helmets, helmet pads, screws, washers, helmet parts, buckles, bike carrier parts, bike parts and baby seat parts (duty rate ranges from free to 17.6%). The request indicates that textile bags (classified under HTSUS Subheading 4202.92) will be admitted to the zone in privileged foreign status (19 CFR 146.41), thereby precluding inverted tariff benefits on such items. Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions shall be addressed to the Board’s Executive Secretary at the address below. The closing period for their receipt is August 27, 2013. A copy of the notification will be available for public inspection at the Office of the Executive Secretary, Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room 21013, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230–0002, and in the ‘‘Reading Room’’ section of the Board’s Web site, which is accessible via www.trade.gov/ftz. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Whiteman at Elizabeth. Whiteman@trade.gov or (202) 482–0473. Dated: July 12, 2013. Andrew McGilvray, Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. 2013–17264 Filed 7–17–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–900] Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People’s Republic of China: Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2010–2011 Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is amending the final results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on diamond sawblades and parts thereof (diamond sawblades) from the People’s Republic of China (the PRC) to correct a AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\18JYN1.SGM 18JYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 138 / Thursday, July 18, 2013 / Notices ministerial error.1 The period of review (POR) is November 1, 2010, through October 31, 2011. DATES: Effective Date: June 17, 2013. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Yang Jin Chun, AD/CVD Operations, Office 1, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5760. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On June 11, 2013, and June 13, 2013, the Department disclosed to interested parties its calculations for the Final Results. On June 17, 2013, Weihai Xiangguang Mechanical Industrial Co., Ltd. (Weihai) filed a ministerial error allegation. On June 24, 2013, the petitioner, Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers Coalition, filed comments in response to Weihai’s ministerial error allegation. Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the order is diamond sawblades. The diamond sawblades subject to the order are currently classifiable under subheadings 8202 to 8206 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), and may also enter under 6804.21.00. The HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes. A full description of the scope of the order is contained in the decision memorandum dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this amended final.2 The written description is dispositive. Ministerial Error Section 751(h) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.224(f) define a ‘‘ministerial error’’ as an error ‘‘in addition, subtraction, or other arithmetic function, clerical error resulting from inaccurate copying, duplication, or the like, and any similar type of unintentional error which the Secretary considers ministerial.’’ After analyzing Weihai’s ministerial error allegation, we have determined, in accordance with section 751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e), that we made a ministerial error in our calculations, having unintentionally incorporated certain factor-ofproduction variables from a subsequently-revised database into the Final Results for Weihei. In accordance with section 751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e), we are amending the Final Results of this administrative review of the antidumping duty order on diamond sawblades from the PRC. The revised weighted-average dumping margins are listed below. For a detailed discussion, see Decision Memorandum for Amended Final. Rate for Non-Selected Separate-Rate Recipients As a result of the correction of the ministerial error, both respondents selected for individual examination have a dumping margin of zero percent.3 Consistent with section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act, and because all prior rates for this proceeding were calculated using a methodology the Department abandoned in its Final Modification for Reviews pursuant to section 123 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act,4 the Department’s prior decisions in administrative reviews involving similar circumstances,5 we find that a reasonable method for determining the weighted-average dumping margins for the non-selected respondents in the amended final results of this administrative review is to average the weighted-average dumping margins calculated for the selected respondents. Consequently, the rate established for the non-selected separate rate respondents is 0.00 percent. For a detailed discussion, see Decision Memorandum for Amended Final. Amended Final Results of the Review The amended weighted-average dumping margins for the administrative review are as follows: Company 6 Margin (percent) TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Bosun Tools Co., Ltd. Chengdu Huifeng Diamond Tools Co., Ltd ......................................................................................................................... Danyang Huachang Diamond Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd ............................................................................................. Danyang NYCL Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd .................................................................................................................... Danyang Weiwang Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................... Guilin Tebon Superhard Material Co., Ltd .......................................................................................................................... Hangzhou Deer King Industrial & Trading Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................ Hebei Husqvarna-Jikai Diamond Tools Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................. Huzhou Gu’s Import & Export Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................... Jiangsu Fengtai Diamond Tool Manufacture Co., Ltd ........................................................................................................ Jiangsu Inter-China Group Corporation .............................................................................................................................. Jiangsu Youhe Tool Manufacturer Co., Ltd ........................................................................................................................ Quanzhou Zhongzhi Diamond Tool Co. Ltd ........................................................................................................................ Rizhao Hein Saw Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................................... Saint-Gobain Abrasives (Shanghai) Co., Ltd ...................................................................................................................... Shanghai Robtol Tool Manufacturing Co., Ltd .................................................................................................................... Weihai Xiangguang Mechanical Industrial Co., Ltd 7 .......................................................................................................... Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Co. ...................................................................................................................... Xiamen ZL Diamond Technology Co., Ltd .......................................................................................................................... Zhejiang Wanli Tools Group Co., Ltd .................................................................................................................................. 1 See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2010– 2011, 78 FR 36166 (June 17, 2013) (Final Results). 2 See Memorandum entitled, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for Amended Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of China covering the Period November 1, 2010, through October 31, 2011,’’ (Decision Memorandum for Amended Final). VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:20 Jul 17, 2013 Jkt 229001 3 See Final Results, 78 FR at 36167, and the Amended Final Results of the Review section below. 4 See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for Reviews). PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 42931 Sfmt 4703 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5 See, e.g., Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof From France, Germany, and Italy: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews and Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews in Part, 77 FR 33159 (June 5, 2012), unchanged in Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof From France, Germany, and Italy: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews; 2010– 2011, 77 FR 73415 (December 10, 2012). E:\FR\FM\18JYN1.SGM 18JYN1 42932 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 138 / Thursday, July 18, 2013 / Notices Disclosure We will disclose the calculation memorandum used in our analysis to parties to this proceeding within five days of the date of the publication of this notice pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224(b). Assessment Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the Department shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries in accordance with the amended final results of this review. In accordance with the Final Modification for Reviews,8 we will instruct CBP to liquidate entries by the firms listed above without regard to antidumping duties. On October 24, 2011, the Department announced a refinement to its assessment practice in NME cases.9 Pursuant to this refinement in practice, for entries that were not reported in the U.S. sales databases submitted by Weihai, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide rate. We intend to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of the amended final results of review. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective retroactively on any entries made on or after June 17, 2013, the date of publication of the Final Results, for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For subject merchandise exported by the companies listed above that have separate rates, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established in this amended final results TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 6 During this segment of the proceeding, we identified certain name variations for several companies. See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: 2010–11, 77 FR 73417, 73418–49, and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 14, unchanged in Final Results. 7 Weihai exported some of the subject merchandise to the United States through its Korean parent company, Ehwa Diamond Industrial Co., Ltd. See, e.g., Weihai’s March 23, 2012, section A response at 1–2. 8 See Antidumping Proceeding: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for Reviews). 9 For a full discussion of this practice, see NonMarket Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011). VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:20 Jul 17, 2013 Jkt 229001 of review for each exporter as listed above; (2) for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters not listed above that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-specific rate; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be that for the PRCwide entity; (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of the antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. These amended final results of review are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(h) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: July 11, 2013. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. 2013–17259 Filed 7–17–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P PO 00000 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–827] Certain Cased Pencils From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Determination To Revoke Order In Part; 2010–2011 Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On January 11, 2013, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary results of the antidumping duty administrative review of certain cased pencils (pencils) from the People’s Republic of China (PRC). The period of review (POR) is December 1, 2010, through November 30, 2011. The review covers one exporter of subject merchandise, Beijing Fila Dixon Stationery Company, Ltd. a/k/a Beijing Dixon Ticonderoga Stationery Company, Ltd., a/k/a Beijing Dixon Stationery Company, Ltd., and Dixon Ticonderoga Company (collectively, Dixon). For the final results, we find that Dixon did not make sales of the subject merchandise at less than normal value. Furthermore, the Department is revoking the antidumping duty order in part with respect to Dixon. DATES: Effective Date: July 18, 2013. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Kolberg or Sergio Balbontin, AD/ CVD Operations, Office 1, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–1785 or (202) 482– 6478, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background On January 11, 2013, the Department published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on pencils from the PRC.1 On January 31, 2013, the Department received comments from Dixon concerning the Department’s selection of the surrogate country and the surrogate values used in the Preliminary Results. The Department conducted verification of Dixon’s sales and factors of production responses from April 8, 2013, through April 10, 1 See Certain Cased Pencils From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Intent Not To Revoke Order In Part; 2010–2011, 78 FR 2363 (January 11, 2013) (Preliminary Results). Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\18JYN1.SGM 18JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 138 (Thursday, July 18, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42930-42932]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-17259]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-900]


Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of 
China: Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 
2010-2011

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is amending the 
final results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty 
order on diamond sawblades and parts thereof (diamond sawblades) from 
the People's Republic of China (the PRC) to correct a

[[Page 42931]]

ministerial error.\1\ The period of review (POR) is November 1, 2010, 
through October 31, 2011.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People's 
Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review; 2010-2011, 78 FR 36166 (June 17, 2013) (Final Results).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: June 17, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Yang Jin Chun, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office 1, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5760.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On June 11, 2013, and June 13, 2013, the Department disclosed to 
interested parties its calculations for the Final Results. On June 17, 
2013, Weihai Xiangguang Mechanical Industrial Co., Ltd. (Weihai) filed 
a ministerial error allegation. On June 24, 2013, the petitioner, 
Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers Coalition, filed comments in response 
to Weihai's ministerial error allegation.

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise subject to the order is diamond sawblades. The 
diamond sawblades subject to the order are currently classifiable under 
subheadings 8202 to 8206 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 
United States (HTSUS), and may also enter under 6804.21.00. The HTSUS 
subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes. A full 
description of the scope of the order is contained in the decision 
memorandum dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this amended 
final.\2\ The written description is dispositive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See Memorandum entitled, ``Decision Memorandum for Amended 
Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Diamond 
Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People's Republic of China 
covering the Period November 1, 2010, through October 31, 2011,'' 
(Decision Memorandum for Amended Final).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ministerial Error

    Section 751(h) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 
19 CFR 351.224(f) define a ``ministerial error'' as an error ``in 
addition, subtraction, or other arithmetic function, clerical error 
resulting from inaccurate copying, duplication, or the like, and any 
similar type of unintentional error which the Secretary considers 
ministerial.'' After analyzing Weihai's ministerial error allegation, 
we have determined, in accordance with section 751(h) of the Act and 19 
CFR 351.224(e), that we made a ministerial error in our calculations, 
having unintentionally incorporated certain factor-of-production 
variables from a subsequently-revised database into the Final Results 
for Weihei.
    In accordance with section 751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e), 
we are amending the Final Results of this administrative review of the 
antidumping duty order on diamond sawblades from the PRC. The revised 
weighted-average dumping margins are listed below. For a detailed 
discussion, see Decision Memorandum for Amended Final.

Rate for Non-Selected Separate-Rate Recipients

    As a result of the correction of the ministerial error, both 
respondents selected for individual examination have a dumping margin 
of zero percent.\3\ Consistent with section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act, 
and because all prior rates for this proceeding were calculated using a 
methodology the Department abandoned in its Final Modification for 
Reviews pursuant to section 123 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act,\4\ 
the Department's prior decisions in administrative reviews involving 
similar circumstances,\5\ we find that a reasonable method for 
determining the weighted-average dumping margins for the non-selected 
respondents in the amended final results of this administrative review 
is to average the weighted-average dumping margins calculated for the 
selected respondents. Consequently, the rate established for the non-
selected separate rate respondents is 0.00 percent. For a detailed 
discussion, see Decision Memorandum for Amended Final.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Final Results, 78 FR at 36167, and the Amended Final 
Results of the Review section below.
    \4\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 
Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012) 
(Final Modification for Reviews).
    \5\ See, e.g., Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof From France, 
Germany, and Italy: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Reviews and Rescission of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Reviews in Part, 77 FR 33159 (June 5, 2012), 
unchanged in Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof From France, Germany, 
and Italy: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews; 
2010-2011, 77 FR 73415 (December 10, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amended Final Results of the Review

    The amended weighted-average dumping margins for the administrative 
review are as follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Company \6\                        Margin (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bosun Tools Co., Ltd...........................
Chengdu Huifeng Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.........                     0.00
Danyang Huachang Diamond Tools Manufacturing                        0.00
 Co., Ltd......................................
Danyang NYCL Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd......                     0.00
Danyang Weiwang Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd...                     0.00
Guilin Tebon Superhard Material Co., Ltd.......                     0.00
Hangzhou Deer King Industrial & Trading Co.,                        0.00
 Ltd...........................................
Hebei Husqvarna-Jikai Diamond Tools Co., Ltd...                     0.00
Huzhou Gu's Import & Export Co., Ltd...........                     0.00
Jiangsu Fengtai Diamond Tool Manufacture Co.,                       0.00
 Ltd...........................................
Jiangsu Inter-China Group Corporation..........                     0.00
Jiangsu Youhe Tool Manufacturer Co., Ltd.......                     0.00
Quanzhou Zhongzhi Diamond Tool Co. Ltd.........                     0.00
Rizhao Hein Saw Co., Ltd.......................                     0.00
Saint-Gobain Abrasives (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.....                     0.00
Shanghai Robtol Tool Manufacturing Co., Ltd....                     0.00
Weihai Xiangguang Mechanical Industrial Co.,                        0.00
 Ltd \7\.......................................
Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Co...........                     0.00
Xiamen ZL Diamond Technology Co., Ltd..........                     0.00
Zhejiang Wanli Tools Group Co., Ltd............                     0.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------


[[Page 42932]]

Disclosure

    We will disclose the calculation memorandum used in our analysis to 
parties to this proceeding within five days of the date of the 
publication of this notice pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ During this segment of the proceeding, we identified certain 
name variations for several companies. See Diamond Sawblades and 
Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: 2010-11, 77 FR 
73417, 73418-49, and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 
14, unchanged in Final Results.
    \7\ Weihai exported some of the subject merchandise to the 
United States through its Korean parent company, Ehwa Diamond 
Industrial Co., Ltd. See, e.g., Weihai's March 23, 2012, section A 
response at 1-2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), 
the Department shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection 
(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries in 
accordance with the amended final results of this review. In accordance 
with the Final Modification for Reviews,\8\ we will instruct CBP to 
liquidate entries by the firms listed above without regard to 
antidumping duties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Antidumping Proceeding: Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 
Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012) 
(Final Modification for Reviews).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On October 24, 2011, the Department announced a refinement to its 
assessment practice in NME cases.\9\ Pursuant to this refinement in 
practice, for entries that were not reported in the U.S. sales 
databases submitted by Weihai, the Department will instruct CBP to 
liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide rate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Non-Market 
Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 
76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We intend to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the 
date of publication of the amended final results of review.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective 
retroactively on any entries made on or after June 17, 2013, the date 
of publication of the Final Results, for all shipments of the subject 
merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption as 
provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For subject 
merchandise exported by the companies listed above that have separate 
rates, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established in this 
amended final results of review for each exporter as listed above; (2) 
for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters not 
listed above that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this 
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-
specific rate; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that 
have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit 
rate will be that for the PRC-wide entity; (4) for all non-PRC 
exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own 
rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC 
exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit 
requirements shall remain in effect until further notice.

Notification

    This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
reimbursement of the antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.
    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 
written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or 
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to 
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable 
violation.
    These amended final results of review are issued and published in 
accordance with sections 751(h) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: July 11, 2013.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013-17259 Filed 7-17-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P