Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Order Granting Approval of Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1 Thereto, Relating to the WisdomTree Global Corporate Bond Fund and the WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund, 41968-41971 [2013-16689]
Download as PDF
41968
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 134 / Friday, July 12, 2013 / Notices
venues. In such an environment, the
Exchange must continually review and
change its fees and rebates to remain
competitive with other exchanges and to
offer its ETP Holders and their
customers the means to achieve
economically efficient securities
transactions. The Exchange believes that
the proposed rule change reflects this
competitive environment.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
As noted above, the Exchange
believes that the proposed rule changes
are consistent with Section 6(b) of the
Act and specifically Section 6(b)(8) in
that they do not impose any burden on
competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. The Exchange
believes that increasing the rebate paid
to ETP Holders using the Double Play
Order will operate to promote
competition by potentially attracting
additional liquidity to the Exchange and
providing access to liquidity on the
CBSX. The Exchange does not believe
that passing through the rebate received
from the CBSX to ETP Holders imposes
a burden on competition for any other
Exchange approved Trading Center
since other Trading Centers may offer
other competitive functions or features
such as low cost executions, faster
executions, of increased levels of
liquidity. The ETP Holder may choose
which offering is most attractive and the
increased rebate is one factor which an
ETP Holder may consider. As stated
above, the Exchange operates in a highly
competitive market in which market
participants can choose competing
venues. In such an environment, the
Exchange must continually review, and
consider adjusting, its fees and rebates
to remain competitive with other
exchanges.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange has neither solicited
nor received written comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The proposed rule change has taken
effect upon filing pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Exchange Act 16
and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4.17
At any time within 60 days of the filing
of such proposed rule change, the
16 15
17 17
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
CFR 240.19b–4.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:46 Jul 11, 2013
Jkt 229001
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–NSX–2013–14 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NSX–2013–14. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
offices of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–NSX–
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2013–14, and should be submitted on or
before August 2, 2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.18
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–16749 Filed 7–11–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–69944; File No.
SR–NASDAQ–2013–079]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Order
Granting Approval of Proposed Rule
Change, as Modified by Amendment
No. 1 Thereto, Relating to the
WisdomTree Global Corporate Bond
Fund and the WisdomTree Emerging
Markets Corporate Bond Fund
July 8, 2013.
I. Introduction
On May 17, 2013, The NASDAQ
Stock Market LLC (‘‘Exchange’’ or
‘‘Nasdaq’’) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’),
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 a
proposed rule change relating to the
WisdomTree Global Corporate Bond
Fund (‘‘Global Fund’’) and the
WisdomTree Emerging Markets
Corporate Bond Fund (‘‘Emerging
Markets Fund,’’ and collectively with
the Global Fund, the ‘‘Funds’’) of the
WisdomTree Trust (‘‘Trust’’). On May
20, 2013, the Exchange filed Partial
Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule
change. The Commission published for
comment in the Federal Register notice
of the proposed rule change, as
modified by Amendment No. 1 thereto,
on June 4, 2013.3 The Commission
received no comments on the proposed
rule change. This order approves the
proposed rule change, as modified by
Amendment No. 1 thereto.
II. Description of the Proposed Rule
Change
The Commission approved the listing
and trading of Shares of each of the
Funds under NASDAQ Rule 5735,
which governs the listing and trading of
Managed Fund Shares on the
18 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 69657
(May 29, 2013), 78 FR 33457 (‘‘Notice’’).
1 15
E:\FR\FM\12JYN1.SGM
12JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 134 / Friday, July 12, 2013 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Exchange.4 The Funds are actively
managed exchange-traded funds
(‘‘ETFs’’). The Shares are offered by the
Trust, which was established as a
Delaware statutory trust on December
15, 2005.5 The Trust, which is registered
with the Commission as an investment
company, filed a registration statement
on Form N–1A with the Commission on
behalf of each of the Funds (each, a
‘‘Registration Statement’’).6
WisdomTree Asset Management, Inc. is
the investment adviser (‘‘Adviser’’) to
the Funds. Western Asset Management
Company serves as sub-adviser for the
Funds (‘‘Sub-Adviser’’).
The proposed rule change seeks to: (i)
Allow each Fund to invest up to 40%
of its net assets (calculated at the time
of investment) in Rule 144A securities
that have been deemed liquid by the
Adviser or Sub-Adviser, in addition to
the 15% investment limitation on
illiquid securities (which limitation,
following approval of this proposal,
would include Rule 144A securities
deemed illiquid by the Adviser or SubAdviser); (ii) permit the Global Fund to
invest up to 20% of its net assets in
sovereign debt; 7 and (iii) amend the
definitions of Global Corporate Debt in
the Global Fund and Corporate and
Quasi-Sovereign Debt in the Emerging
Markets Fund to include both (a)
inflation-protected debt, fixed income
securities and other debt obligations
linked to inflation rates of local
economies, and (b) variable rate or
floating rate securities which are
readjusted on set dates (such as the last
day of the month or calendar quarter) in
the case of variable rates or whenever a
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 66489
(February 29, 2012), 77 FR 13379 (March 6, 2012)
(SR–NASDAQ–2012–004) (order approving listing
and trading of WisdomTree Emerging Markets
Corporate Bond Fund) (‘‘Emerging Markets Fund
Order’’); and 68073 (October 19, 2012), 77 FR 65237
(October 25, 2012) (SR–NASDAQ–2012–98) (order
approving listing and trading of WisdomTree Global
Corporate Bond Fund) (‘‘Global Fund Order,’’ and
collectively the ‘‘Prior Approval Orders’’).
5 The Commission issued an order granting
certain exemptive relief to the Trust under the
Investment Company Act of 1940 (‘‘1940 Act’’). See
Investment Company Act Release No. 28171
(October 27, 2008) (File No. 812–13458)
(‘‘Exemptive Order’’).
6 See Post-Effective Amendment Nos. 99 to
Registration Statement on Form N–1A for the Trust,
dated February 8, 2012 (File Nos. 333–132380 and
811–21864) (relating to the Emerging Markets Fund)
and 139 to Registration Statement on Form N–1A
for the Trust, dated October 26, 2012 (relating to the
Global Fund).
7 Sovereign debt does not fall within the
definition of Global Corporate Debt in the Global
Fund Order, and it therefore would not be
considered as part of the 80% minimum investment
in fixed income securities that are Global Corporate
Debt within the Global Fund Order. The
Registration Statement defines ‘‘sovereign debt’’ as
‘‘debt securities of foreign governments,’’ for
purposes of the Global Fund.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:46 Jul 11, 2013
Jkt 229001
specified interest rate change occurs in
the case of a floating rate instrument.8
Under the Prior Approval Orders, the
Funds are permitted to hold up to 15%
of their respective net assets in illiquid
securities (calculated at the time of
investment), including (i) Rule 144A
securities and (ii) loan interests (such as
loan participations and assignments, but
not including LPNs). Under the 1940
Act and rules thereunder, the Funds are
required to monitor their respective
portfolio’s liquidity on an ongoing basis
to determine whether, in light of current
circumstances, an adequate level of
liquidity is being maintained, and to
consider taking appropriate steps in
order to maintain adequate liquidity if
through a change in values, net assets or
other circumstances, more than 15% of
the Fund’s net assets are held in illiquid
securities.9
The Exchange seeks to modify the
Advisor’s representations in the Prior
Approval Orders to increase the
percentage of Rule 144A securities that
each Fund may hold. Under the
proposed amendment, each Fund may
continue to hold up to an aggregate
amount of 15% of its net assets in
illiquid securities (calculated at the time
of investment), including (i) Rule 144A
securities deemed illiquid by the
Adviser or Sub-Adviser, and (ii) loan
interests (including loan participations
and assignments, but not including
LPNs).10 In addition, each Fund would
8 Variable or floating interest rates generally
reduce changes in the market price of securities
from their original purchase price because, upon
readjustment, such rates approximate market rates.
Accordingly, as interest rates decrease or increase,
the potential for capital appreciation or
depreciation is less for variable or floating rate
securities than for fixed rate obligations.
9 Illiquid securities were defined in the Emerging
Markets Fund Order to include securities that
cannot be sold or disposed of within seven days in
the ordinary course of business at approximately
the amount at which a fund has valued such
securities. Illiquid securities were defined in the
Global Fund Order to include securities subject to
contractual or other restrictions on resale and other
instruments that lack readily available markets as
determined in accordance with Commission staff
guidance. See Prior Approval Orders, supra note 4.
10 While the ultimate responsibility for
determination of liquidity of securities (including
Rule 144A securities) lies with each Fund’s Board
of Directors, the Funds’ Sub-Adviser is responsible
for complying with each Fund’s restrictions on
investing in illiquid securities on a day-to-day
basis. In doing that, the Sub-Adviser makes ongoing
determinations about the liquidity of Rule 144A
securities in which the respective Fund may invest.
In reaching liquidity decisions, the Adviser
represents that the Sub-Adviser may consider the
following factors: The frequency of trades and
quotes for the security; the number of dealers
wishing to purchase or sell the security and the
number of other potential purchasers; dealer
undertakings to make a market in the security; and
the nature of the security and of the marketplace
trades (e.g., the time needed to dispose of the
security, the method of soliciting offers, and the
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
41969
be permitted under the proposal to hold
up to an additional 40% of its net assets
(calculated at the time of investment) in
Rule 144A securities, so long as those
Rule 144A securities are not deemed
illiquid by the Adviser or Sub-Adviser.
The proposed rule change would,
therefore, exclude liquid Rule 144A
securities from the 15% limitation on
investments in illiquid securities and
limit each Fund’s investment in liquid
Rule 144A securities to 40% of the
Fund’s net assets. The Adviser
represents that each Fund’s holdings in
Rule 144A securities not deemed
illiquid by it or the Sub-Adviser will be
comprised of issuances with more than
$100 million principal outstanding.
The Adviser represents that the
purpose of this aspect of the proposed
change is to provide the Sub-Adviser
greater flexibility to meet each Fund’s
investment objectives. Rule 144A
securities are securities that are not
registered under the Securities Act and
which can only be offered and sold to
‘‘qualified institutional buyers’’ under
Rule 144A of the Securities Act.11 The
Exchange notes that Rule 144A was
adopted, in part, to promote a more
liquid resale market in unregistered
securities among institutional
investors,12 and the Adviser represents
that liquid institutional markets for Rule
144A securities, including those Rule
144A securities generally held by the
Funds, have developed. The Adviser
represents that, for example, most
reference benchmarks for noninvestment grade corporate bonds
include more than 25% Rule 144A
securities.13 The Adviser does not
expect a materially different result for
the Funds since the market for
investment grade bonds,14 which the
mechanics of transfer). See Securities Act Release
No. 6862 (April 23, 1990), 55 FR 17933, 17940
(April 30, 1990) (Resale of Restricted Securities;
Changes to Method of Determining Holding Period
of Restricted Securities Under Rules 144 and 145).
See also Notice, supra note 3.
11 The term ‘‘qualified institutional buyer’’ (QIB)
is defined in Rule 144A(a)(1). 17 CFR
230.144A(a)(1).
12 See Securities Act Release No. 6862 (April 23,
1990), 55 FR 17933 (April 30, 1990).
13 See, e.g., Merrill Lynch High Yield Master II
index (‘‘Master II index’’), which as of November 6,
2012, was comprised of 32% Rule 144A securities.
The Master II index is the benchmark index for the
American Century High-Yield Inv ETF (ABHIX).
Also, as of March 6, 2013, Barclays High Yield Very
Liquid Index was comprised of 43% Rule 144A
securities. That index is the benchmark for the
SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF (JNK).
14 The Global Fund intends to have 55% or more
of its assets invested in investment grade securities,
though this percentage may change from time to
time in response to economic events and changes
in the credit ratings of such issuers. See Global
Fund Order at 65238. The Emerging Markets Fund
expects to have 65% or more of its assets invested
E:\FR\FM\12JYN1.SGM
Continued
12JYN1
41970
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 134 / Friday, July 12, 2013 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Funds each hold, is typically more
liquid than the market for similar noninvestment grade bonds. The Adviser
further notes that the average issue size
for Rule 144A securities is comparable
to the average issue size for registered
securities within most high yield bond
indices. Finally, the Adviser represents
that currently-listed high yield bond
ETFs typically include a significant
percentage of Rule 144A securities
within their respective portfolios.15
Based on these representations, the
Exchange believes there is ample
existing precedent, and that its proposal
is consistent with such precedent, to
permit each Fund to invest up to 40%
of its net assets (calculated at the time
of investment) in liquid Rule 144A
securities, in addition to the 15%
limitation on illiquid securities,
including illiquid Rule 144A securities.
The Adviser represents that it does
not believe that the ability of the Funds’
agent to calculate Net Asset Value
(‘‘NAV’’) and an indicative intra-day
value (‘‘IIV’’) for each Fund, and
disseminate such IIV every 15 seconds
in investment grade securities, though this
percentage may change in response to economic
events and changes to the ratings of such issuers.
See Emerging Markets Order at 13380.
The Global Fund Order defines the term
‘‘investment grade’’ to mean securities rated in the
Baa/BBB categories or above by one or more
nationally recognized statistical rating organizations
(‘‘NRSROs’’). If a security is rated by multiple
NRSROs, each Fund will treat the security as being
rated in the highest rating category received from
an NRSRO. Rating categories may include subcategories or gradations indicating relative standing.
See Global Fund Order at note 11. The Emerging
Markets Fund Order does not define the term
‘‘investment grade.’’ However, the Adviser
represents that it intends to apply the definition of
‘‘investment’’ grade’’ in the Global Fund Order to
the Emerging Markets Fund. See Notice, supra note
3; see also, Prior Approval Orders, supra note 4.
15 For example, the Adviser represents that as of
November 6, 2012, more than 30% of the
investment portfolio of the actively-managed
Peritus High Yield ETF was comprised of Rule
144A securities. See Securities Exchange Act
Release Nos. 63329 (November 17, 2010), 75 FR
71760 (November 24, 2010) (SR–NYSEArca–2010–
86) (order approving proposed rule change relating
to listing and trading of Peritus High Yield ETF);
and 63041 (October 5, 2010), 75 FR 62905 (October
13, 2010) (SR–NYSEArca–2010–86) (notice of filing
of proposed rule change to list the Peritus High
Yield ETF). See also Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 66818 (April 17, 2012), 77 FR 24233
(April 23, 2012) (SR–NYSEArca–2012–33) (notice of
filing and immediate effectiveness of proposed rule
change regarding Peritus High Yield ETF). The
Adviser also represents that the investment
strategies of various index-based high yield ETFs
permit active use of Rule 144A securities, provided
such securities are deemed liquid. See, e.g.,
prospectus for SPDR Barclays Capital High Yield
Bond ETF, https://www.spdrs.com/library-content/
public/SPDR_SERIES%20TRUST_SAI.pdf, which
explicitly permits the fund to invest in Rule 144A
securities deemed liquid. The Adviser represents
that as of November 6, 2012, the portfolio of the
SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF included
approximately 37% Rule 144A securities.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:46 Jul 11, 2013
Jkt 229001
throughout the trading day, has been
impeded by the Funds’ current Rule
144A holdings limited to 15% of net
assets, and the Adviser does not expect
that permitting each Fund to increase its
liquid Rule 144A holdings as set forth
above will impede the ability of the
Funds’ agent to calculate an NAV and
an IIV and disseminate such IIV every
15 seconds throughout the trading day.
In addition to modifying the
percentage of Rule 144A holdings in
which the Funds may invest, the
Exchange also proposes that the
requirements of the Global Fund Order
be modified to permit the Global Fund
to invest up to 20% of its net assets in
sovereign debt, which regarding the
Global Fund, is defined as ‘‘debt
securities of foreign governments.’’ 16
Finally, the Exchange proposes to
modify the definition of Global
Corporate Debt with respect to the
Global Fund and Corporate and QuasiSovereign Debt with respect to the
Emerging Markets Fund to include
inflation protected debt and certain
variable rate or floating rate securities.
The Global Fund Order defined
Global Corporate Debt to include fixed
income securities, such as bonds, notes,
or other debt obligations, including
LPNs, as well as debt instruments
denominated in U.S. dollars or local
currencies. Global Corporate Debt also
included fixed income securities or debt
obligations issued by companies or
agencies that may receive financial
support or backing from local
governments, as well as money market
securities as defined therein.17
The Emerging Markets Fund Order
defined Corporate and Quasi-Sovereign
Debt as fixed income securities of
emerging market countries, such as
bonds, notes or other debt obligations,
including LPNs, as well as other
instruments, such as derivative
instruments, collateralized by money
market securities, as defined therein.
Quasi-Sovereign Debt referred
specifically to fixed income securities or
debt obligations that are issued by
companies or agencies that may receive
financial support or backing from a local
government.
The Exchange proposes that the Prior
Approval Orders be modified to amend
the definitions of Global Corporate Debt
with respect to the Global Fund and
Corporate and Quasi-Sovereign Debt
with respect to the Emerging Markets
Fund, to include (i) inflation-protected
debt, including fixed income securities
and other debt obligations linked to
inflation rates of local economies, and
PO 00000
16 See
17 See
supra, note 7.
Global Fund Order, supra note 4.
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(ii) variable rate or floating rate
securities which are readjusted on set
dates (such as the last day of the month
or calendar quarter) in the case of
variable rates or whenever a specified
interest rate change occurs in the case
of a floating rate instrument. The
Adviser represents that these proposed
changes regarding permitted
investments would allow the Funds to
invest in a broader range of market
sectors and thus would help further the
Funds’ investment objectives to obtain
both income and capital appreciation
through direct and indirect investments
in Global Corporate Debt or Corporate
and Quasi-Sovereign Debt, as
applicable, and other investments.
Additional information regarding the
Funds, such as pricing and valuation,
including NAV, can be found in the
Notice and Prior Approval Orders.
Except for the changes discussed
herein, all other facts presented and
representations made in the Rule 19b–
4 18 filings underlying the Prior
Approval Orders remain unchanged.
The Exchange represents that the
changes proposed would be consistent
with the Exemptive Order 19 and the
1940 Act and rules thereunder.
III. Discussion and Commission’s
Findings
The Commission believes that the
proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)
of the Act,20 in general, and Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,21 in particular, in that
it is designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in
facilitating transactions in securities,
and to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system.22
The Commission understands that,
while one aspect of this proposal will
allow each Fund to invest up to 40% of
its net assets (calculated at the time of
investment) in liquid Rule 144A
securities, the Funds will continue to be
capped at 15% of their respective net
assets (calculated at the time of
investment) in illiquid securities,
including illiquid Rule 144A securities
and loan participations or assignments
(but not including LPNs). The SubAdviser, who is responsible for day-to18 17
CFR 240.19b–4.
supra, note 5.
20 15 U.S.C. 78f.
21 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
22 In approving this proposed rule change, the
Commission has considered the proposed rule’s
impact on efficiency, competition, and capital
formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
19 See
E:\FR\FM\12JYN1.SGM
12JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 134 / Friday, July 12, 2013 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
day decisions regarding liquidity of
securities, may consider the following
factors regarding liquidity: The
frequency of trades and quotes for the
security; the number of dealers wishing
to purchase or sell the security and the
number of other potential purchasers;
dealer undertakings to make a market in
the security; and the nature of the
security and of the marketplace trades
(e.g., the time needed to dispose of the
security, the method of soliciting offers,
and the mechanics of transfer).23
Ultimately, however, each Fund’s Board
of Directors has responsibility for
determining the liquidity of securities
(including Rule 144A securities) held by
the Funds. The Commission notes that
the Adviser represents that each Fund’s
holdings in Rule 144A securities
deemed liquid by the Sub-Adviser will
be part of an issuance with more than
$100 million in principal outstanding.
Finally, the Exchange has stated that the
Adviser represents it does not expect
that the proposed rule change will
impede the ability of the Funds’ agent
to calculate an NAV and an IIV and
disseminate such IIV every 15 seconds
throughout the trading day.
The Commission further notes that
pursuant to the 1940 Act and rules
thereunder, the Funds are required to
monitor their respective portfolio’s
liquidity on an ongoing basis to
determine whether, in light of current
circumstances, an adequate level of
liquidity is being maintained, and to
consider taking appropriate steps in
order to maintain adequate liquidity if
through a change in values, net assets or
other circumstances, more than 15% of
the Fund’s net assets are held in illiquid
securities.
Thus, the Commission finds that
providing the Adviser and Sub-Adviser
additional flexibility with respect to
investing in a larger percentage of
investments in Rule 144A Securities,
given the protections discussed above,
is consistent with the Act.
The Exchange also proposes to allow
the Global Fund to invest up to 20% of
its net assets in sovereign debt, which
is defined as ‘‘debt securities of foreign
governments.’’ 24 Given that the Global
Fund will continue to have at least 80%
of its net assets in Global Corporate Debt
that are fixed income securities and the
Fund’s limitation regarding non23 See Securities Act Release No. 6862 (April 23,
1990), 55 FR 17933, 17940 (April 30, 1990) (Resale
of Restricted Securities; Changes to Method of
Determining Holding Period of Restricted Securities
Under Rules 144 and 145). See also supra, note 10.
24 Sovereign debt, according to the Exchange,
enjoys a relationship to foreign governments that is
not unlike that of Treasury debt securities and the
U.S. government. See Notice, supra note 3.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:46 Jul 11, 2013
Jkt 229001
investment grade securities, the
Commission believes it is consistent
with the Act for the Exchange to allow
up to 20% of net assets of the Global
Fund in sovereign debt.
Finally, the Commission believes that
it is consistent with the Act for the
Exchange to amend the definition of
Global Corporate Debt in the Global
Fund and Corporate and QuasiSovereign Debt in the Emerging Markets
Fund, as set forth in the Prior Approval
Orders, to include (i) inflation-protected
debt, fixed income securities and other
debt obligations linked to inflation rates
of local economies, and (ii) variable rate
or floating rate securities which are
readjusted on set dates (such as the last
day of the month or calendar quarter) in
the case of variable rates or whenever a
specified interest rate change occurs in
the case of a floating rate instrument.
The Commission believes that this
expansion of the definition is
reasonable, given the characteristics of
these securities, and would permit the
Funds to invest in a broader range of
market sectors, and thereby help further
the Fund’s objectives to obtain both
income and capital appreciation
through direct and indirect investments
in Global Corporate Debt or Corporate
and Quasi-Sovereign Debt, as
applicable, and other investments.
Thus, the Commission finds this aspect
of the proposal is consistent with the
Act.25
Importantly, the Commission notes
that the Shares will continue to be listed
and traded on the Exchange pursuant to
the initial and continued listing criteria
in NASDAQ Rule 5735. In addition, the
Adviser represents there is no change to
either Fund’s investment objective, and
except for the limited changes discussed
herein, all other facts represented and
representations made in the Rule 19b–
4 26 filings underlying the Prior
Approval Orders, and representations
and findings set forth in the Prior
Approval Orders, remain unchanged.
The Exchange represents that the
changes proposed would be consistent
with the Exemptive Order 27 and the
1940 Act and rules thereunder.
This approval order is based on the
Exchange’s representations.
IV. Conclusion
For the foregoing reasons, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with Section
25 See, e.g., Securities Act Release Nos. 65458
(September 30, 2011), 76 FR 62112 (October 6,
2011) (SR–NYSEArca–2011–54) and 64935 (July 20,
2011), 76 FR 44966 (July 27, 2011) (SR–NYSEArca–
2011–31).
26 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
27 See supra, note 5.
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
41971
6(b)(5) of the Act 28 and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to a
national securities exchange.
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,29 that the
proposed rule change (SR–NASDAQ–
2013–079), as modified by Amendment
No. 1 thereto, be, and it hereby is,
approved.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.30
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–16689 Filed 7–11–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 8376]
30-Day Notice of Proposed Information
Collection: Electronic Diversity Visa
Entry Form
Notice of request for public
comment and submission to OMB of
proposed collection of information.
ACTION:
The Department of State has
submitted the information collection
described below to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
approval. In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 we
are requesting comments on this
collection from all interested
individuals and organizations. The
purpose of this Notice is to allow 30
days for public comment.
DATES: Submit comments directly to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) up to August 12, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Direct comments to the
Department of State Desk Officer in the
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs at the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB). You may submit
comments by the following methods:
• Email:
oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. You
must include the DS form number,
information collection title, and the
OMB control number in the subject line
of your message.
• Fax: 202–395–5806. Attention: Desk
Officer for Department of State.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Direct requests for additional
information regarding the collection
listed in this notice, including requests
for copies of the proposed collection
instrument and supporting documents,
to Sydney Taylor, Visa Services, U.S.
SUMMARY:
28 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
30 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
29 15
E:\FR\FM\12JYN1.SGM
12JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 134 (Friday, July 12, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41968-41971]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-16689]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-69944; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2013-079]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Order
Granting Approval of Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No.
1 Thereto, Relating to the WisdomTree Global Corporate Bond Fund and
the WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund
July 8, 2013.
I. Introduction
On May 17, 2013, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``Exchange'' or
``Nasdaq'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change relating to the WisdomTree Global Corporate Bond
Fund (``Global Fund'') and the WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate
Bond Fund (``Emerging Markets Fund,'' and collectively with the Global
Fund, the ``Funds'') of the WisdomTree Trust (``Trust''). On May 20,
2013, the Exchange filed Partial Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule
change. The Commission published for comment in the Federal Register
notice of the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1
thereto, on June 4, 2013.\3\ The Commission received no comments on the
proposed rule change. This order approves the proposed rule change, as
modified by Amendment No. 1 thereto.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 69657 (May 29,
2013), 78 FR 33457 (``Notice'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Description of the Proposed Rule Change
The Commission approved the listing and trading of Shares of each
of the Funds under NASDAQ Rule 5735, which governs the listing and
trading of Managed Fund Shares on the
[[Page 41969]]
Exchange.\4\ The Funds are actively managed exchange-traded funds
(``ETFs''). The Shares are offered by the Trust, which was established
as a Delaware statutory trust on December 15, 2005.\5\ The Trust, which
is registered with the Commission as an investment company, filed a
registration statement on Form N-1A with the Commission on behalf of
each of the Funds (each, a ``Registration Statement'').\6\ WisdomTree
Asset Management, Inc. is the investment adviser (``Adviser'') to the
Funds. Western Asset Management Company serves as sub-adviser for the
Funds (``Sub-Adviser'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 66489 (February 29,
2012), 77 FR 13379 (March 6, 2012) (SR-NASDAQ-2012-004) (order
approving listing and trading of WisdomTree Emerging Markets
Corporate Bond Fund) (``Emerging Markets Fund Order''); and 68073
(October 19, 2012), 77 FR 65237 (October 25, 2012) (SR-NASDAQ-2012-
98) (order approving listing and trading of WisdomTree Global
Corporate Bond Fund) (``Global Fund Order,'' and collectively the
``Prior Approval Orders'').
\5\ The Commission issued an order granting certain exemptive
relief to the Trust under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (``1940
Act''). See Investment Company Act Release No. 28171 (October 27,
2008) (File No. 812-13458) (``Exemptive Order'').
\6\ See Post-Effective Amendment Nos. 99 to Registration
Statement on Form N-1A for the Trust, dated February 8, 2012 (File
Nos. 333-132380 and 811-21864) (relating to the Emerging Markets
Fund) and 139 to Registration Statement on Form N-1A for the Trust,
dated October 26, 2012 (relating to the Global Fund).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed rule change seeks to: (i) Allow each Fund to invest up
to 40% of its net assets (calculated at the time of investment) in Rule
144A securities that have been deemed liquid by the Adviser or Sub-
Adviser, in addition to the 15% investment limitation on illiquid
securities (which limitation, following approval of this proposal,
would include Rule 144A securities deemed illiquid by the Adviser or
Sub-Adviser); (ii) permit the Global Fund to invest up to 20% of its
net assets in sovereign debt; \7\ and (iii) amend the definitions of
Global Corporate Debt in the Global Fund and Corporate and Quasi-
Sovereign Debt in the Emerging Markets Fund to include both (a)
inflation-protected debt, fixed income securities and other debt
obligations linked to inflation rates of local economies, and (b)
variable rate or floating rate securities which are readjusted on set
dates (such as the last day of the month or calendar quarter) in the
case of variable rates or whenever a specified interest rate change
occurs in the case of a floating rate instrument.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Sovereign debt does not fall within the definition of Global
Corporate Debt in the Global Fund Order, and it therefore would not
be considered as part of the 80% minimum investment in fixed income
securities that are Global Corporate Debt within the Global Fund
Order. The Registration Statement defines ``sovereign debt'' as
``debt securities of foreign governments,'' for purposes of the
Global Fund.
\8\ Variable or floating interest rates generally reduce changes
in the market price of securities from their original purchase price
because, upon readjustment, such rates approximate market rates.
Accordingly, as interest rates decrease or increase, the potential
for capital appreciation or depreciation is less for variable or
floating rate securities than for fixed rate obligations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under the Prior Approval Orders, the Funds are permitted to hold up
to 15% of their respective net assets in illiquid securities
(calculated at the time of investment), including (i) Rule 144A
securities and (ii) loan interests (such as loan participations and
assignments, but not including LPNs). Under the 1940 Act and rules
thereunder, the Funds are required to monitor their respective
portfolio's liquidity on an ongoing basis to determine whether, in
light of current circumstances, an adequate level of liquidity is being
maintained, and to consider taking appropriate steps in order to
maintain adequate liquidity if through a change in values, net assets
or other circumstances, more than 15% of the Fund's net assets are held
in illiquid securities.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Illiquid securities were defined in the Emerging Markets
Fund Order to include securities that cannot be sold or disposed of
within seven days in the ordinary course of business at
approximately the amount at which a fund has valued such securities.
Illiquid securities were defined in the Global Fund Order to include
securities subject to contractual or other restrictions on resale
and other instruments that lack readily available markets as
determined in accordance with Commission staff guidance. See Prior
Approval Orders, supra note 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange seeks to modify the Advisor's representations in the
Prior Approval Orders to increase the percentage of Rule 144A
securities that each Fund may hold. Under the proposed amendment, each
Fund may continue to hold up to an aggregate amount of 15% of its net
assets in illiquid securities (calculated at the time of investment),
including (i) Rule 144A securities deemed illiquid by the Adviser or
Sub-Adviser, and (ii) loan interests (including loan participations and
assignments, but not including LPNs).\10\ In addition, each Fund would
be permitted under the proposal to hold up to an additional 40% of its
net assets (calculated at the time of investment) in Rule 144A
securities, so long as those Rule 144A securities are not deemed
illiquid by the Adviser or Sub-Adviser. The proposed rule change would,
therefore, exclude liquid Rule 144A securities from the 15% limitation
on investments in illiquid securities and limit each Fund's investment
in liquid Rule 144A securities to 40% of the Fund's net assets. The
Adviser represents that each Fund's holdings in Rule 144A securities
not deemed illiquid by it or the Sub-Adviser will be comprised of
issuances with more than $100 million principal outstanding.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ While the ultimate responsibility for determination of
liquidity of securities (including Rule 144A securities) lies with
each Fund's Board of Directors, the Funds' Sub-Adviser is
responsible for complying with each Fund's restrictions on investing
in illiquid securities on a day-to-day basis. In doing that, the
Sub-Adviser makes ongoing determinations about the liquidity of Rule
144A securities in which the respective Fund may invest. In reaching
liquidity decisions, the Adviser represents that the Sub-Adviser may
consider the following factors: The frequency of trades and quotes
for the security; the number of dealers wishing to purchase or sell
the security and the number of other potential purchasers; dealer
undertakings to make a market in the security; and the nature of the
security and of the marketplace trades (e.g., the time needed to
dispose of the security, the method of soliciting offers, and the
mechanics of transfer). See Securities Act Release No. 6862 (April
23, 1990), 55 FR 17933, 17940 (April 30, 1990) (Resale of Restricted
Securities; Changes to Method of Determining Holding Period of
Restricted Securities Under Rules 144 and 145). See also Notice,
supra note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Adviser represents that the purpose of this aspect of the
proposed change is to provide the Sub-Adviser greater flexibility to
meet each Fund's investment objectives. Rule 144A securities are
securities that are not registered under the Securities Act and which
can only be offered and sold to ``qualified institutional buyers''
under Rule 144A of the Securities Act.\11\ The Exchange notes that Rule
144A was adopted, in part, to promote a more liquid resale market in
unregistered securities among institutional investors,\12\ and the
Adviser represents that liquid institutional markets for Rule 144A
securities, including those Rule 144A securities generally held by the
Funds, have developed. The Adviser represents that, for example, most
reference benchmarks for non-investment grade corporate bonds include
more than 25% Rule 144A securities.\13\ The Adviser does not expect a
materially different result for the Funds since the market for
investment grade bonds,\14\ which the
[[Page 41970]]
Funds each hold, is typically more liquid than the market for similar
non-investment grade bonds. The Adviser further notes that the average
issue size for Rule 144A securities is comparable to the average issue
size for registered securities within most high yield bond indices.
Finally, the Adviser represents that currently-listed high yield bond
ETFs typically include a significant percentage of Rule 144A securities
within their respective portfolios.\15\ Based on these representations,
the Exchange believes there is ample existing precedent, and that its
proposal is consistent with such precedent, to permit each Fund to
invest up to 40% of its net assets (calculated at the time of
investment) in liquid Rule 144A securities, in addition to the 15%
limitation on illiquid securities, including illiquid Rule 144A
securities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ The term ``qualified institutional buyer'' (QIB) is defined
in Rule 144A(a)(1). 17 CFR 230.144A(a)(1).
\12\ See Securities Act Release No. 6862 (April 23, 1990), 55 FR
17933 (April 30, 1990).
\13\ See, e.g., Merrill Lynch High Yield Master II index
(``Master II index''), which as of November 6, 2012, was comprised
of 32% Rule 144A securities. The Master II index is the benchmark
index for the American Century High-Yield Inv ETF (ABHIX). Also, as
of March 6, 2013, Barclays High Yield Very Liquid Index was
comprised of 43% Rule 144A securities. That index is the benchmark
for the SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF (JNK).
\14\ The Global Fund intends to have 55% or more of its assets
invested in investment grade securities, though this percentage may
change from time to time in response to economic events and changes
in the credit ratings of such issuers. See Global Fund Order at
65238. The Emerging Markets Fund expects to have 65% or more of its
assets invested in investment grade securities, though this
percentage may change in response to economic events and changes to
the ratings of such issuers. See Emerging Markets Order at 13380.
The Global Fund Order defines the term ``investment grade'' to
mean securities rated in the Baa/BBB categories or above by one or
more nationally recognized statistical rating organizations
(``NRSROs''). If a security is rated by multiple NRSROs, each Fund
will treat the security as being rated in the highest rating
category received from an NRSRO. Rating categories may include sub-
categories or gradations indicating relative standing. See Global
Fund Order at note 11. The Emerging Markets Fund Order does not
define the term ``investment grade.'' However, the Adviser
represents that it intends to apply the definition of ``investment''
grade'' in the Global Fund Order to the Emerging Markets Fund. See
Notice, supra note 3; see also, Prior Approval Orders, supra note 4.
\15\ For example, the Adviser represents that as of November 6,
2012, more than 30% of the investment portfolio of the actively-
managed Peritus High Yield ETF was comprised of Rule 144A
securities. See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 63329 (November
17, 2010), 75 FR 71760 (November 24, 2010) (SR-NYSEArca-2010-86)
(order approving proposed rule change relating to listing and
trading of Peritus High Yield ETF); and 63041 (October 5, 2010), 75
FR 62905 (October 13, 2010) (SR-NYSEArca-2010-86) (notice of filing
of proposed rule change to list the Peritus High Yield ETF). See
also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66818 (April 17, 2012), 77
FR 24233 (April 23, 2012) (SR-NYSEArca-2012-33) (notice of filing
and immediate effectiveness of proposed rule change regarding
Peritus High Yield ETF). The Adviser also represents that the
investment strategies of various index-based high yield ETFs permit
active use of Rule 144A securities, provided such securities are
deemed liquid. See, e.g., prospectus for SPDR Barclays Capital High
Yield Bond ETF, https://www.spdrs.com/library-content/public/SPDR_SERIES%20TRUST_SAI.pdf, which explicitly permits the fund to invest
in Rule 144A securities deemed liquid. The Adviser represents that
as of November 6, 2012, the portfolio of the SPDR Barclays High
Yield Bond ETF included approximately 37% Rule 144A securities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Adviser represents that it does not believe that the ability of
the Funds' agent to calculate Net Asset Value (``NAV'') and an
indicative intra-day value (``IIV'') for each Fund, and disseminate
such IIV every 15 seconds throughout the trading day, has been impeded
by the Funds' current Rule 144A holdings limited to 15% of net assets,
and the Adviser does not expect that permitting each Fund to increase
its liquid Rule 144A holdings as set forth above will impede the
ability of the Funds' agent to calculate an NAV and an IIV and
disseminate such IIV every 15 seconds throughout the trading day.
In addition to modifying the percentage of Rule 144A holdings in
which the Funds may invest, the Exchange also proposes that the
requirements of the Global Fund Order be modified to permit the Global
Fund to invest up to 20% of its net assets in sovereign debt, which
regarding the Global Fund, is defined as ``debt securities of foreign
governments.'' \16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See supra, note 7.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, the Exchange proposes to modify the definition of Global
Corporate Debt with respect to the Global Fund and Corporate and Quasi-
Sovereign Debt with respect to the Emerging Markets Fund to include
inflation protected debt and certain variable rate or floating rate
securities.
The Global Fund Order defined Global Corporate Debt to include
fixed income securities, such as bonds, notes, or other debt
obligations, including LPNs, as well as debt instruments denominated in
U.S. dollars or local currencies. Global Corporate Debt also included
fixed income securities or debt obligations issued by companies or
agencies that may receive financial support or backing from local
governments, as well as money market securities as defined therein.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See Global Fund Order, supra note 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Emerging Markets Fund Order defined Corporate and Quasi-
Sovereign Debt as fixed income securities of emerging market countries,
such as bonds, notes or other debt obligations, including LPNs, as well
as other instruments, such as derivative instruments, collateralized by
money market securities, as defined therein. Quasi-Sovereign Debt
referred specifically to fixed income securities or debt obligations
that are issued by companies or agencies that may receive financial
support or backing from a local government.
The Exchange proposes that the Prior Approval Orders be modified to
amend the definitions of Global Corporate Debt with respect to the
Global Fund and Corporate and Quasi-Sovereign Debt with respect to the
Emerging Markets Fund, to include (i) inflation-protected debt,
including fixed income securities and other debt obligations linked to
inflation rates of local economies, and (ii) variable rate or floating
rate securities which are readjusted on set dates (such as the last day
of the month or calendar quarter) in the case of variable rates or
whenever a specified interest rate change occurs in the case of a
floating rate instrument. The Adviser represents that these proposed
changes regarding permitted investments would allow the Funds to invest
in a broader range of market sectors and thus would help further the
Funds' investment objectives to obtain both income and capital
appreciation through direct and indirect investments in Global
Corporate Debt or Corporate and Quasi-Sovereign Debt, as applicable,
and other investments.
Additional information regarding the Funds, such as pricing and
valuation, including NAV, can be found in the Notice and Prior Approval
Orders.
Except for the changes discussed herein, all other facts presented
and representations made in the Rule 19b-4 \18\ filings underlying the
Prior Approval Orders remain unchanged. The Exchange represents that
the changes proposed would be consistent with the Exemptive Order \19\
and the 1940 Act and rules thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\19\ See supra, note 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Discussion and Commission's Findings
The Commission believes that the proposal is consistent with
Section 6(b) of the Act,\20\ in general, and Section 6(b)(5) of the
Act,\21\ in particular, in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent
and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, and to
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
\21\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\22\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has
considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission understands that, while one aspect of this proposal
will allow each Fund to invest up to 40% of its net assets (calculated
at the time of investment) in liquid Rule 144A securities, the Funds
will continue to be capped at 15% of their respective net assets
(calculated at the time of investment) in illiquid securities,
including illiquid Rule 144A securities and loan participations or
assignments (but not including LPNs). The Sub-Adviser, who is
responsible for day-to-
[[Page 41971]]
day decisions regarding liquidity of securities, may consider the
following factors regarding liquidity: The frequency of trades and
quotes for the security; the number of dealers wishing to purchase or
sell the security and the number of other potential purchasers; dealer
undertakings to make a market in the security; and the nature of the
security and of the marketplace trades (e.g., the time needed to
dispose of the security, the method of soliciting offers, and the
mechanics of transfer).\23\ Ultimately, however, each Fund's Board of
Directors has responsibility for determining the liquidity of
securities (including Rule 144A securities) held by the Funds. The
Commission notes that the Adviser represents that each Fund's holdings
in Rule 144A securities deemed liquid by the Sub-Adviser will be part
of an issuance with more than $100 million in principal outstanding.
Finally, the Exchange has stated that the Adviser represents it does
not expect that the proposed rule change will impede the ability of the
Funds' agent to calculate an NAV and an IIV and disseminate such IIV
every 15 seconds throughout the trading day.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ See Securities Act Release No. 6862 (April 23, 1990), 55 FR
17933, 17940 (April 30, 1990) (Resale of Restricted Securities;
Changes to Method of Determining Holding Period of Restricted
Securities Under Rules 144 and 145). See also supra, note 10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission further notes that pursuant to the 1940 Act and
rules thereunder, the Funds are required to monitor their respective
portfolio's liquidity on an ongoing basis to determine whether, in
light of current circumstances, an adequate level of liquidity is being
maintained, and to consider taking appropriate steps in order to
maintain adequate liquidity if through a change in values, net assets
or other circumstances, more than 15% of the Fund's net assets are held
in illiquid securities.
Thus, the Commission finds that providing the Adviser and Sub-
Adviser additional flexibility with respect to investing in a larger
percentage of investments in Rule 144A Securities, given the
protections discussed above, is consistent with the Act.
The Exchange also proposes to allow the Global Fund to invest up to
20% of its net assets in sovereign debt, which is defined as ``debt
securities of foreign governments.'' \24\ Given that the Global Fund
will continue to have at least 80% of its net assets in Global
Corporate Debt that are fixed income securities and the Fund's
limitation regarding non-investment grade securities, the Commission
believes it is consistent with the Act for the Exchange to allow up to
20% of net assets of the Global Fund in sovereign debt.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ Sovereign debt, according to the Exchange, enjoys a
relationship to foreign governments that is not unlike that of
Treasury debt securities and the U.S. government. See Notice, supra
note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, the Commission believes that it is consistent with the Act
for the Exchange to amend the definition of Global Corporate Debt in
the Global Fund and Corporate and Quasi-Sovereign Debt in the Emerging
Markets Fund, as set forth in the Prior Approval Orders, to include (i)
inflation-protected debt, fixed income securities and other debt
obligations linked to inflation rates of local economies, and (ii)
variable rate or floating rate securities which are readjusted on set
dates (such as the last day of the month or calendar quarter) in the
case of variable rates or whenever a specified interest rate change
occurs in the case of a floating rate instrument. The Commission
believes that this expansion of the definition is reasonable, given the
characteristics of these securities, and would permit the Funds to
invest in a broader range of market sectors, and thereby help further
the Fund's objectives to obtain both income and capital appreciation
through direct and indirect investments in Global Corporate Debt or
Corporate and Quasi-Sovereign Debt, as applicable, and other
investments. Thus, the Commission finds this aspect of the proposal is
consistent with the Act.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ See, e.g., Securities Act Release Nos. 65458 (September 30,
2011), 76 FR 62112 (October 6, 2011) (SR-NYSEArca-2011-54) and 64935
(July 20, 2011), 76 FR 44966 (July 27, 2011) (SR-NYSEArca-2011-31).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Importantly, the Commission notes that the Shares will continue to
be listed and traded on the Exchange pursuant to the initial and
continued listing criteria in NASDAQ Rule 5735. In addition, the
Adviser represents there is no change to either Fund's investment
objective, and except for the limited changes discussed herein, all
other facts represented and representations made in the Rule 19b-4 \26\
filings underlying the Prior Approval Orders, and representations and
findings set forth in the Prior Approval Orders, remain unchanged. The
Exchange represents that the changes proposed would be consistent with
the Exemptive Order \27\ and the 1940 Act and rules thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\27\ See supra, note 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This approval order is based on the Exchange's representations.
IV. Conclusion
For the foregoing reasons, the Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act \28\ and the
rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities
exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\29\ that the proposed rule change (SR-NASDAQ-2013-079), as
modified by Amendment No. 1 thereto, be, and it hereby is, approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-16689 Filed 7-11-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P