Sodium Hexametaphosphate From China; Determination, 40505-40506 [2013-16093]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 129 / Friday, July 5, 2013 / Notices
and other applicable laws and
regulations.
The BLM will determine as a result of
the proposed plan amendment and
associated EA whether the reversionary
interest in the lands are suitable for
disposal, then the BLM NESO,
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, intends to
convey the reversionary interests in the
lands patented to the Unity Point
Improvement Association, Oneida
County, Wisconsin, to allow and
achieve the highest and best use of the
lands without the threat of a reversion
of title for breach of patent conditions.
The lands are not needed for Federal
purposes and the United States has no
present interest in the properties other
than the reservation of the mineral
interests to the United States and
whether a direct sale of the reversionary
interest is appropriate under Section
203 of FLPMA. The proposed action is
consistent with Federal laws, State and
local planning and zoning ordinances. If
it is determined through the planning
process the lands are suitable, the
reversionary interests in the lands will
be offered by direct sale to the Unity
Point Improvement Association for the
appraised fair market value of $78,000
at least October 3, 2013.
Pursuant to the terms and conditions
of the original patents dated July 25,
1966, and October 5, 1972, the United
States retains and continues to hold
reversionary interests in the following
lands:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
4th Principal Meridian
T. 37 N., R. 8 E.,
Sec. 33, lots 6 and 13.
The area described contains 0.81 acres per
the official survey, approved April 23, 1928.
The lands were conveyed to the Unity
Point Improvement Association for the
purpose of providing public recreation
and lake access, but this use is no longer
needed because the State of Wisconsin
developed facilities for recreation and
lake access in the immediate area.
Development of the lands for recreation
have been limited by the small area and
location of the parcels on a densely
subdivided narrow peninsula with
inadequate access along a private single
lane dirt road. The BLM received a
request from the Unity Point
Improvement Association to purchase
the reversionary interests held by the
United States to allow the lands to be
used for purposes otherwise restricted
by the reversionary clause in the patents
under the R&PP authority. The sale of
reversionary interests will eliminate
management oversight for lands that
have been underutilized and
undeveloped for public recreation as
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:06 Jul 03, 2013
Jkt 229001
intended by the terms and conditions of
the R&PP Act conveyance.
If the plan amendment is approved,
the reversionary interests in the lands
will be offered by direct sale procedures
in accordance with regulations at 43
CFR 2711.3–3(a)(1)(3) and (4). The
direct sale of reversionary interest to
Unity Point Improvement Association
would be appropriate to protect the
landowner from economic loss and
retain sale and release of the
reversionary interests in the 0.81 acres
will be made in accordance with
Section 203 of FLPMA, applicable
regulations of the Secretary of the
Interior, and the following:
1. A condition that the conveyance be
subject to all valid existing rights of
record;
2. An appropriate indemnification
clause protecting the United States from
claims arising out of the patentee’s use,
occupancy, or operations on the
patented lands;
3. The terms and conditions of the
United States patent 1239859 and patent
1242505 reserving mineral deposits in
the lands, together with the right to
mine and remove the same, under
applicable laws and such regulations to
be established by the Secretary of the
Interior;
4. No representation, warranty, or
covenant of any kind, express or
implied, is given or made by the United
States as to access to or from any parcel
of land, the title, whether or to what
extent the lands may be developed,
physical condition, present or potential
uses, or any other circumstance or
condition; and
5. Additional terms and conditions
that the authorized officer deems
appropriate to ensure proper land use
and protection of the public interest.
Detailed information concerning the
proposed sale, including the appraisal,
planning and environmental
documents, are available for review at
the NSFO at the address listed in the
ADDRESSES section above.
You may submit comments on issues
and planning criteria and/or the
proposed direct sale in writing to the
BLM at any public scoping meeting, or
you may submit them to the BLM using
one of the methods listed in the
ADDRESSES section above. To be most
helpful, you should submit comments
by the close of the 45-day scoping
period or within 30 days after the last
public meeting, whichever is later. The
minutes and list of attendees for each
scoping meeting will be available to the
public and open for 30 days after the
meeting to any participant who wishes
to clarify the views he or she expressed.
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
40505
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
The BLM will use an interdisciplinary
approach to develop the plan
amendment and associated EA in order
to consider the variety of resource issues
and concerns identified. Specialists
with expertise in the following
disciplines will be involved in the
planning process: Archaeology, wildlife
and fisheries, and lands and realty.
Any adverse written comments
received regarding the proposed sale
will be reviewed by the BLM State
Director, Eastern States, who may
sustain, vacate, or modify the realty
action. In the absence of adverse
comments and with the approval of the
amendment, the proposed realty action
will become the final determination of
the Department of the Interior.
Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7; 43 CFR 1610.2;
2711.1–2(a)(c).
John G. Lyon,
State Director, Eastern States.
[FR Doc. 2013–16130 Filed 7–3–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–GJ–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–1110 (Review)]
Sodium Hexametaphosphate From
China; Determination
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject five-year review, the
United States International Trade
Commission (Commission) determines,
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), that
revocation of the antidumping duty
order on sodium hexametaphosphate
from China would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material
injury to an industry in the United
States within a reasonably foreseeable
time.
Background
The Commission instituted this
review on February 1, 2013 (78 FR 7452)
and determined on May 7, 2013, that it
1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
Commission=s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
E:\FR\FM\05JYN1.SGM
05JYN1
40506
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 129 / Friday, July 5, 2013 / Notices
would conduct an expedited review (78
FR 31576, May 24, 2013). The
Commission transmitted its
determination in this investigation to
the Secretary of Commerce on June 28,
2013. The views of the Commission are
contained in USITC Publication 4410
(June 2013), entitled Sodium
Hexametaphosphate from China:
Investigation No. 731–TA–1110
(Review).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: June 28, 2013.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2013–16093 Filed 7–3–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–829]
Certain Toner Cartridges and
Components Thereof; Issuance of
General Exclusion Order and Cease
and Desist Orders; Termination of
Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined to issue a
general exclusion order (‘‘GEO’’) and
cease and desist orders (‘‘CDOs’’) in the
above-captioned investigation. The
investigation is terminated.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cathy Chen, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–2392. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on February 27, 2012, based upon a
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:06 Jul 03, 2013
Jkt 229001
complaint filed on behalf of Canon, Inc.
of Tokyo, Japan; Canon U.S.A., Inc. of
Lake Success, New York; and Canon
Virginia, Inc. of Newport News, Virginia
(collectively, ‘‘Canon’’) on January 23,
2012. 77 FR 11586 (Feb. 27, 2012). The
complaint alleged violations of section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the sale for
importation, importation, or sale after
importation of certain toner cartridges
and components thereof that infringe
one or more of claims 128–130, 132–133
and 139–143 of U.S. Patent Nos.
5,903,803 (‘‘the ’803 patent’’) or claims
24–30 of U.S. Patent No. 6,128,454 (‘‘the
’454 patent’’). The notice of
investigation named thirty-four
respondents.
On August 30, 2012, the ALJ issued
an initial determination finding the
following sixteen respondents in
default: Shanghai Orink Infotech
International Co., Ltd. of Shanghai,
China; Orink Infotech International Co.,
Ltd. of Hong Kong, China; Zhuhai Rich
Imaging Technology Co., Ltd. of
Guangdong, China; Standard Image Co.,
Ltd. (a/k/a Shanghai Orink Co., Ltd.) of
Shanghai, China; Zhuhai National
Resources & Jingjie Imaging Products
Co., Ltd. (d/b/a Huebon Co., Ltd., d/b/
a Ink-Tank) of Guangdong, China;
Standard Image USA, Inc. (d/b/a
Imaging Standard Inc.) of Santa Ana,
California; Printronic Corporation (d/b/
a Printronic.com, d/b/a InkSmile.com)
of Santa Ana, California; Nukote, Inc. of
Plano, Texas; Acecom, Inc.—San
Antonio (d/b/a InkSell.com) of San
Antonio, Texas; Do It Wiser LLC (d/b/
a Image Toner) of Marietta, Georgia; EMax Group, Inc. (d/b/a Databazaar.com)
of Miramar, Florida; IJSS Inc. (d/b/a
TonerZone.com, d/b/a
InkJetSuperstore.com) of Los Angeles,
California; Imaging Resources LLC of
Chatsworth, California; Ink
Technologies Printer Supplies, LLC of
Dayton, Ohio; SupplyBuy.com, Inc. of
Nashville, Tennessee; and Zinyaw LLC
(d/b/a TonerPirate.com) of Houston,
Texas. Order No. 14 (nonreviewed
October 2, 2012).
On October 10, 2012, the ALJ issued
an ID granting Canon’s unopposed
motion to withdraw the complaint as to
respondent, Nukote Internacional de
Mexico, S.A. de C.V. of Neuva Leon,
Mexico and thereby to terminate this
respondent from the investigation.
Order No. 17 (nonreviewed Nov. 14,
2012).
The remaining respondents were
terminated from the investigation on the
basis of consent orders: Clover
Holdings, Inc.; Clover Technologies
Group LLC; Clover Vietnam Co., Ltd.;
Dataproducts USA, LLC; Dataproducts
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Imaging Solutions S.A. de C.V.; CAU
Acquisition Co., LLC (d/b/a Cartridges
Are Us); Atman, Inc. (d/b/a
pcRUSH.com); Dexxxon Digital Storage,
Inc.; Discount Office Items, Inc. and
Deal Express LLC (d/b/a Discount Office
Items); Green Project, Inc.; GreenLine
Paper Co., Inc.; Myriad Greeyn LLC;
Office World Inc. and OfficeWorld.com,
Inc.; OnlineTechStores.com, Inc. (d/b/a
SuppliesOutlet.com); and Virtual
Imaging Products, Inc. Order No. 8
(nonreviewed July 16, 2012); Order No.
12 (nonreviewed Aug. 10, 2012); Order
No. 18 (nonreviewed Nov. 14, 2012);
Order No. 19 (nonreviewed Nov. 14,
2012); Order No. 20 (nonreviewed Nov.
14, 2012); Order No. 22 (nonreviewed
Dec. 13, 2012). Accordingly, the only
parties remaining active in this
investigation are Canon and the
Investigative Attorney (‘‘IA’’).
On September 21, 2012, Canon filed
a motion for summary determination
that it satisfies the economic prong of
the domestic industry requirement. On
October 4, 2012, the IA submitted a
response supporting the motion. On
February 26, 2013, the ALJ issued an ID
(Order No. 24), granting the motion. On
March 25, 2013, the Commission
determined not to review the ID.
On November 16, 2012, Canon filed a
motion for summary determination of
violation with respect to the defaulting
respondents. On February 28, 2013, the
ALJ issued his final initial
determination on violation and
recommendation on remedy (‘‘ID/RD’’),
Order No. 25, granting the motion. The
ALJ recommended issuance of a general
exclusion order, issuance of cease and
desist orders to the eleven defaulting
domestic respondents, and the
imposition of a bond of 100 percent of
entered value during the period of
Presidential review. On April 17, 2013,
the Commission issued notice of its
determination not to review the ALJ’s
final determination on violation.
The Commission has determined that
the appropriate form of relief is the
following: (1) A GEO under 19 U.S.C.
1337(d)(2), prohibiting the unlicensed
entry of toner cartridges and
components thereof that infringe one or
more of claims 128–130, 132, 133 and
139–143 of the ’803 patent or claims 24–
30 of the ’454 patent; and (2) CDOs
directed to defaulting domestic
respondents Standard Image USA, Inc.;
Printronic Corporation; Nukote, Inc.; Do
It Wiser LLC; E-Max Group, Inc.; IJSS
Inc.; Imaging Resources, LLC; Ink
Technologies Printer Supplies LLC;
SupplyBuy.com, Inc.; Zinyaw LLC; and
Acecom Inc.—San Antonio; and
defaulting foreign respondents Shanghai
Orink Infotech International Co., Orink
E:\FR\FM\05JYN1.SGM
05JYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 129 (Friday, July 5, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40505-40506]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-16093]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731-TA-1110 (Review)]
Sodium Hexametaphosphate From China; Determination
On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year
review, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission)
determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19
U.S.C. 1675(c)), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on
sodium hexametaphosphate from China would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the
United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission=s
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Background
The Commission instituted this review on February 1, 2013 (78 FR
7452) and determined on May 7, 2013, that it
[[Page 40506]]
would conduct an expedited review (78 FR 31576, May 24, 2013). The
Commission transmitted its determination in this investigation to the
Secretary of Commerce on June 28, 2013. The views of the Commission are
contained in USITC Publication 4410 (June 2013), entitled Sodium
Hexametaphosphate from China: Investigation No. 731-TA-1110 (Review).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: June 28, 2013.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2013-16093 Filed 7-3-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
