Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review, 39710-39712 [2013-15761]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
39710
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 127 / Tuesday, July 2, 2013 / Notices
C. Data Considerations
COMMENT II: Surrogate Financial Ratios
COMMENT III: Surrogate Value for Labor
COMMENT IV: Surrogate Value for Rice
Husk
COMMENT V: Surrogate Value for Inland
Freight
COMMENT VI: Surrogate Value for Byproducts
COMMENT VII: Zeroing
COMPANY–SPECIFIC ISSUES:
COMMENT VIII: Valuation of Dathaco and
Fatifish’s River Water
COMMENT IX: Valuation of Hoang Long’s
Other By-Products
[FR Doc. 2013–15882 Filed 7–1–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation; Opportunity To Request
Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD
Operations, Customs Unit, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230,
telephone: (202) 482–4735.
AGENCY:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Background
Each year during the anniversary
month of the publication of an
antidumping or countervailing duty
order, finding, or suspended
investigation, an interested party, as
defined in section 771(9) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’),
may request, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.213, that the Department of
Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) conduct
an administrative review of that
antidumping or countervailing duty
order, finding, or suspended
investigation.
All deadlines for the submission of
comments or actions by the Department
discussed below refer to the number of
calendar days from the applicable
starting date.
Respondent Selection
In the event the Department limits the
number of respondents for individual
examination for administrative reviews
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:48 Jul 01, 2013
Jkt 229001
initiated pursuant to requests made for
the orders identified below, the
Department intends to select
respondents based on U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) data for U.S.
imports during the period of review. We
intend to release the CBP data under
Administrative Protective Order
(‘‘APO’’) to all parties having an APO
within five days of publication of the
initiation notice and to make our
decision regarding respondent selection
within 21 days of publication of the
initiation Federal Register notice.
Therefore, we encourage all parties
interested in commenting on respondent
selection to submit their APO
applications on the date of publication
of the initiation notice, or as soon
thereafter as possible. The Department
invites comments regarding the CBP
data and respondent selection within
five days of placement of the CBP data
on the record of the review.
In the event the Department decides
it is necessary to limit individual
examination of respondents and
conduct respondent selection under
section 777A(c)(2) of the Act:
In general, the Department has found
that determinations concerning whether
particular companies should be
‘‘collapsed’’ (i.e., treated as a single
entity for purposes of calculating
antidumping duty rates) require a
substantial amount of detailed
information and analysis, which often
require follow-up questions and
analysis. Accordingly, the Department
will not conduct collapsing analyses at
the respondent selection phase of this
review and will not collapse companies
at the respondent selection phase unless
there has been a determination to
collapse certain companies in a
previous segment of this antidumping
proceeding (i.e., investigation,
administrative review, new shipper
review or changed circumstances
review). For any company subject to this
review, if the Department determined,
or continued to treat, that company as
collapsed with others, the Department
will assume that such companies
continue to operate in the same manner
and will collapse them for respondent
selection purposes. Otherwise, the
Department will not collapse companies
for purposes of respondent selection.
Parties are requested to (a) identify
which companies subject to review
previously were collapsed, and (b)
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
provide a citation to the proceeding in
which they were collapsed. Further, if
companies are requested to complete
the Quantity and Value Questionnaire
for purposes of respondent selection, in
general each company must report
volume and value data separately for
itself. Parties should not include data
for any other party, even if they believe
they should be treated as a single entity
with that other party. If a company was
collapsed with another company or
companies in the most recently
completed segment of this proceeding
where the Department considered
collapsing that entity, complete quantity
and value data for that collapsed entity
must be submitted.
Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for
Administrative Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a
party that has requested a review may
withdraw that request within 90 days of
the date of publication of the notice of
initiation of the requested review. The
regulation provides that the Department
may extend this time if it is reasonable
to do so. In order to provide parties
additional certainty with respect to
when the Department will exercise its
discretion to extend this 90-day
deadline, interested parties are advised
that, with regard to reviews requested
on the basis of anniversary months on
or after July 2013, the Department does
not intend to extend the 90-day
deadline unless the requestor
demonstrates that an extraordinary
circumstance has prevented it from
submitting a timely withdrawal request.
Determinations by the Department to
extend the 90-day deadline will be
made on a case-by-case basis.
The Department is providing this
notice on its Web site, as well as in its
‘‘Opportunity to Request Administrative
Review’’ notices, so that interested
parties will be aware of the manner in
which the Department intends to
exercise its discretion in the future.
Opportunity to Request a Review: Not
later than the last day of July 2013,1
interested parties may request
administrative review of the following
orders, findings, or suspended
investigations, with anniversary dates in
July for the following periods:
1 Or the next business day, if the deadline falls
on a weekend, federal holiday or any other day
when the Department is closed.
E:\FR\FM\02JYN1.SGM
02JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 127 / Tuesday, July 2, 2013 / Notices
39711
Period of review
Antidumping Duty Proceedings
FINLAND: Carboxymethylcellulose A–405–803 ............................................................................................................................
INDIA: Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film A–533–824 .........................................................................................................
IRAN: In-Shell Pistachios A–507–502 ...........................................................................................................................................
ITALY: Certain Pasta A–475–818 .................................................................................................................................................
JAPAN: Clad Steel Plate A–588–838 ...........................................................................................................................................
JAPAN: Polyvinyl Alcohol A–588–861 ..........................................................................................................................................
JAPAN: Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils A–588–845 ......................................................................................................
NETHERLANDS: Carboxymethylcellulose A–421–811 ................................................................................................................
REPUBLIC OF KOREA: Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils A–580–834 ............................................................................
RUSSIA: Solid Urea A–821–801 ...................................................................................................................................................
TAIWAN: Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film A–583–837 .....................................................................................................
TAIWAN: Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils A–583–831 ....................................................................................................
THAILAND: Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings A–549–807 ....................................................................................................
THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings A–570–814 ......................................................
THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Certain Potassium Phosphate Salts A–570–962 ........................................................
THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Certain Steel Grating A–570–947 ...............................................................................
THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Pipe A–570–910 ............................................
THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Persulfates A–570–847 ...............................................................................................
THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Saccharin A–570–878 .................................................................................................
TURKEY: Certain Pasta A–489–805 .............................................................................................................................................
UKRAINE: Solid Urea A–823–801 ................................................................................................................................................
7/1/12–6/30/13
7/1/12–6/30/13
7/1/12–6/30/13
7/1/12–6/30/13
7/1/12–6/30/13
7/1/12–6/30/13
7/1/12–6/30/13
7/1/12–6/30/13
7/1/12–6/30/13
7/1/12–6/30/13
7/1/12–6/30/13
7/1/12–6/30/13
7/1/12–6/30/13
7/1/12–6/30/13
7/1/12–6/30/13
7/1/12–6/30/13
7/1/12–6/30/13
7/1/12–6/30/13
7/1/12–6/30/13
7/1/12–6/30/13
7/1/12–6/30/13
Countervailing Duty Proceedings
INDIA: Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film C–533–825 .........................................................................................................
ITALY: Certain Pasta C–475–819 .................................................................................................................................................
THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Certain Potassium Phosphate Salts C–570–963 ........................................................
THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Certain Steel Grating C–570–948 ...............................................................................
THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Pipe C–570–911 ............................................
THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand C–570–946 ................................................
TURKEY: Certain Pasta C–489–806 ............................................................................................................................................
1/1/12–12/31/12
1/1/12–12/31/12
1/1/12–12/31/12
1/1/12–12/31/12
1/1/12–12/31/12
1/1/12–12/31/12
1/1/12–12/31/12
Suspension Agreements
RUSSIA: Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products A–821–809 .........................................................................................
7/1/12–6/30/13
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
In accordance with 19 CFR
351.213(b), an interested party as
defined by section 771(9) of the Act may
request in writing that the Secretary
conduct an administrative review. For
both antidumping and countervailing
duty reviews, the interested party must
specify the individual producers or
exporters covered by an antidumping
finding or an antidumping or
countervailing duty order or suspension
agreement for which it is requesting a
review. In addition, a domestic
interested party or an interested party
described in section 771(9)(B) of the Act
must state why it desires the Secretary
to review those particular producers or
exporters.2 If the interested party
intends for the Secretary to review sales
of merchandise by an exporter (or a
producer if that producer also exports
merchandise from other suppliers)
which were produced in more than one
country of origin and each country of
origin is subject to a separate order, then
the interested party must state
2 If the review request involves a non-market
economy and the parties subject to the review
request do not qualify for separate rates, all other
exporters of subject merchandise from the nonmarket economy country who do not have a
separate rate will be covered by the review as part
of the single entity of which the named firms are
a part.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:48 Jul 01, 2013
Jkt 229001
specifically, on an order-by-order basis,
which exporter(s) the request is
intended to cover.
Please note that, for any party the
Department was unable to locate in
prior segments, the Department will not
accept a request for an administrative
review of that party absent new
information as to the party’s location.
Moreover, if the interested party who
files a request for review is unable to
locate the producer or exporter for
which it requested the review, the
interested party must provide an
explanation of the attempts it made to
locate the producer or exporter at the
same time it files its request for review,
in order for the Secretary to determine
if the interested party’s attempts were
reasonable, pursuant to 19 CFR
351.303(f)(3)(ii).
As explained in Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment ofAntidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003), and NonMarket Economy Antidumping
Proceedings: Assessment of
Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694
(October 24, 2011) the Department has
clarified its practice with respect to the
collection of final antidumping duties
on imports of merchandise where
intermediate firms are involved. The
public should be aware of this
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
clarification in determining whether to
request an administrative review of
merchandise subject to antidumping
findings and orders. See also the Import
Administration Web site at https://
trade.gov/ia.
All requests must be filed
electronically in Import
Administration’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (‘‘IA
ACCESS’’) on the IA ACCESS Web site
at https://iaaccess.trade.gov. See
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Electronic Filing
Procedures; Administrative Protective
Order Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6,
2011). Further, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.303(f)(l)(i), a copy of each
request must be served on the petitioner
and each exporter or producer specified
in the request.
The Department will publish in the
Federal Register a notice of ‘‘Initiation
of Administrative Review of
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation’’ for requests received by
the last day of July 2013. If the
Department does not receive, by the last
day of July 2013, a request for review of
entries covered by an order, finding, or
suspended investigation listed in this
notice and for the period identified
E:\FR\FM\02JYN1.SGM
02JYN1
39712
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 127 / Tuesday, July 2, 2013 / Notices
above, the Department will instruct CBP
to assess antidumping or countervailing
duties on those entries at a rate equal to
the cash deposit of (or bond for)
estimated antidumping or
countervailing duties required on those
entries at the time of entry, or
withdrawal from warehouse, for
consumption and to continue to collect
the cash deposit previously ordered.
For the first administrative review of
any order, there will be no assessment
of antidumping or countervailing duties
on entries of subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption during the relevant
provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period, of
the order, if such a gap period is
applicable to the period of review.
This notice is not required by statute
but is published as a service to the
international trading community.
Dated: June 14, 2013.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2013–15761 Filed 7–1–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
University of Illinois, et al.; Notice of
Decision on Applications for Duty-Free
Entry of Scientific Instruments
This is a decision pursuant to Section
6(c) of the Educational, Scientific, and
Cultural Materials Importation Act of
1966 (Pub. L. 89–651, as amended by
Pub. L. 106–36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR
part 301). Related records can be viewed
between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. in
Room 3720, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th and Constitution Ave,
NW., Washington, DC.
Docket Number: 13–007. Applicant:
University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801.
Instrument: Electron Microscope.
Manufacturer: FEI Company, Czech
Republic. Intended Use: See notice at 78
FR 20614–20615, April 5, 2013.
Comments: None received. Decision:
Approved. We know of no instruments
of equivalent scientific value to the
foreign instruments described below, for
such purposes as this is intended to be
used, that was being manufactured in
the United States at the time of its order.
Reasons: The instrument will be used to
seek the measurement and potentially
direct-tailoring of materials properties,
through the study of the relation of
structure to catalytic activity, strain and
composition within nanostructures, the
effects of impurities on the strength of
materials, and other properties of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:48 Jul 01, 2013
Jkt 229001
catalytic materials such as Pt, Ru, and
Mo, semiconductor nanostructures (Si,
Ge, InAs), metal alloys such as Ni/Al,
and other materials.
Docket Number: 13–010. Applicant:
University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
15261. Instrument: Electron Microscope.
Manufacturer: FEI Czech Republic.
Intended Use: See notice at 78 FR
20614–20615, April 5, 2013. Comments:
None received. Decision: Approved. We
know of no instruments of equivalent
scientific value to the foreign
instruments described below, for such
purposes as this is intended to be used,
that was being manufactured in the
United States at the time of its order.
Reasons: The instrument will be used to
gain a better understanding of the
relationship between microstructure
and the performance of materials,
through the analysis of crystallographic
texture, the identification of
crystallographic orientation
relationships between precipitates and
the matrix, precipitate size distributions
and the analysis of chemical
compositions of electronic materials,
advanced ceramics for medical
applications, advanced Ni-based
Superalloys, stainless steels (for energy
applications), advanced high-strength
steels, and many other materials.
Docket Number: 13–011. Applicant:
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda,
MD 20892. Instrument: Electron
Microscope. Manufacturer: JEOL Ltd.,
Japan. Intended Use: See notice at 78 FR
20614–20615, April 5, 2013. Comments:
None received. Decision: Approved. We
know of no instruments of equivalent
scientific value to the foreign
instruments described below, for such
purposes as this is intended to be used,
that was being manufactured in the
United States at the time of its order.
Reasons: The instrument will be used to
help understand how the human body
functions normally, such as in learning,
memory or hearing, and to understand
the pathologies of human diseases. In
order to understand these functions, this
instrument will be used in experiments
such as identifying the molecular
components of a structure in an adult
and in development, as well as looking
for changes in the structure brought on
by disease or by normal functional
changes in cells of living organisms
such as nerve cells or neurons of the
brain, as well as inner ear cells.
Dated: June 26, 2013.
Gregory W. Campbell,
Director, Subsidies Enforcement Office,
Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013–15883 Filed 7–1–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Critical Infrastructure Protection and
Cyber Security Trade Mission to Saudi
Arabia and Kuwait Clarification and
Amendment
International Trade
Administration, Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The United States Department
of Commerce, International Trade
Administration, U.S. and Foreign
Commercial Service (CS) is publishing
this supplement to the Notice of the
Renewable Energy and Energy
Efficiency Executive Business
Development Mission, 78 FR 6807,
January 31, 2013, to clarify eligibility
and amend the Notice to revise the dates
and provide for selection of applicants
on a rolling basis.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Amendments To Revise the Dates and
Provide for Selection of Applicants on
a Rolling Basis
Background
Recruitment for this Mission began at
the end of January, and some pending
applicants have indicated a need to
finalize their schedules and travel
arrangements for the July/summer
holidays. We would like to extend the
recruitment deadline until mid-July to
allow them time to apply and to more
easily vet all applicants and make
selection decisions, CS is amending the
Notice to allow for vetting and selection
decisions on a rolling basis until July
15, 2013, until the maximum of 20
participants is selected, all interested
U.S. IT and cyber-security firms and
trade organizations which have not
already submitted an application are
encouraged to do so as soon as possible.
Amendments
1. For the reasons stated above, the
Selection Timeline section of the Notice
of the Renewable Energy and Energy
Efficiency Executive Business
Development Mission, 78 FR 6807,
January 31, 2013, is amended to read as
follows:
Selection Timeline
Mission recruitment will be
conducted in an open and public
manner, including publication in the
Federal Register, posting on the
Commerce Department trade mission
calendar (https://www.ita.doc.gov/
doctm/tmcal.html) and other Internet
Web sites, press releases to general and
E:\FR\FM\02JYN1.SGM
02JYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 127 (Tuesday, July 2, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39710-39712]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-15761]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD
Operations, Customs Unit, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482-
4735.
Background
Each year during the anniversary month of the publication of an
antidumping or countervailing duty order, finding, or suspended
investigation, an interested party, as defined in section 771(9) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''), may request, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.213, that the Department of Commerce (``the
Department'') conduct an administrative review of that antidumping or
countervailing duty order, finding, or suspended investigation.
All deadlines for the submission of comments or actions by the
Department discussed below refer to the number of calendar days from
the applicable starting date.
Respondent Selection
In the event the Department limits the number of respondents for
individual examination for administrative reviews initiated pursuant to
requests made for the orders identified below, the Department intends
to select respondents based on U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(``CBP'') data for U.S. imports during the period of review. We intend
to release the CBP data under Administrative Protective Order (``APO'')
to all parties having an APO within five days of publication of the
initiation notice and to make our decision regarding respondent
selection within 21 days of publication of the initiation Federal
Register notice. Therefore, we encourage all parties interested in
commenting on respondent selection to submit their APO applications on
the date of publication of the initiation notice, or as soon thereafter
as possible. The Department invites comments regarding the CBP data and
respondent selection within five days of placement of the CBP data on
the record of the review.
In the event the Department decides it is necessary to limit
individual examination of respondents and conduct respondent selection
under section 777A(c)(2) of the Act:
In general, the Department has found that determinations concerning
whether particular companies should be ``collapsed'' (i.e., treated as
a single entity for purposes of calculating antidumping duty rates)
require a substantial amount of detailed information and analysis,
which often require follow-up questions and analysis. Accordingly, the
Department will not conduct collapsing analyses at the respondent
selection phase of this review and will not collapse companies at the
respondent selection phase unless there has been a determination to
collapse certain companies in a previous segment of this antidumping
proceeding (i.e., investigation, administrative review, new shipper
review or changed circumstances review). For any company subject to
this review, if the Department determined, or continued to treat, that
company as collapsed with others, the Department will assume that such
companies continue to operate in the same manner and will collapse them
for respondent selection purposes. Otherwise, the Department will not
collapse companies for purposes of respondent selection. Parties are
requested to (a) identify which companies subject to review previously
were collapsed, and (b) provide a citation to the proceeding in which
they were collapsed. Further, if companies are requested to complete
the Quantity and Value Questionnaire for purposes of respondent
selection, in general each company must report volume and value data
separately for itself. Parties should not include data for any other
party, even if they believe they should be treated as a single entity
with that other party. If a company was collapsed with another company
or companies in the most recently completed segment of this proceeding
where the Department considered collapsing that entity, complete
quantity and value data for that collapsed entity must be submitted.
Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a party that has requested a
review may withdraw that request within 90 days of the date of
publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review. The
regulation provides that the Department may extend this time if it is
reasonable to do so. In order to provide parties additional certainty
with respect to when the Department will exercise its discretion to
extend this 90-day deadline, interested parties are advised that, with
regard to reviews requested on the basis of anniversary months on or
after July 2013, the Department does not intend to extend the 90-day
deadline unless the requestor demonstrates that an extraordinary
circumstance has prevented it from submitting a timely withdrawal
request. Determinations by the Department to extend the 90-day deadline
will be made on a case-by-case basis.
The Department is providing this notice on its Web site, as well as
in its ``Opportunity to Request Administrative Review'' notices, so
that interested parties will be aware of the manner in which the
Department intends to exercise its discretion in the future.
Opportunity to Request a Review: Not later than the last day of
July 2013,\1\ interested parties may request administrative review of
the following orders, findings, or suspended investigations, with
anniversary dates in July for the following periods:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Or the next business day, if the deadline falls on a
weekend, federal holiday or any other day when the Department is
closed.
[[Page 39711]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Period of review
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Antidumping Duty Proceedings
FINLAND: Carboxymethylcellulose A-405-803............ 7/1/12-6/30/13
INDIA: Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film A-533- 7/1/12-6/30/13
824.................................................
IRAN: In-Shell Pistachios A-507-502.................. 7/1/12-6/30/13
ITALY: Certain Pasta A-475-818....................... 7/1/12-6/30/13
JAPAN: Clad Steel Plate A-588-838.................... 7/1/12-6/30/13
JAPAN: Polyvinyl Alcohol A-588-861................... 7/1/12-6/30/13
JAPAN: Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils A-588- 7/1/12-6/30/13
845.................................................
NETHERLANDS: Carboxymethylcellulose A-421-811........ 7/1/12-6/30/13
REPUBLIC OF KOREA: Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in 7/1/12-6/30/13
Coils A-580-834.....................................
RUSSIA: Solid Urea A-821-801......................... 7/1/12-6/30/13
TAIWAN: Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film A-583- 7/1/12-6/30/13
837.................................................
TAIWAN: Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils A- 7/1/12-6/30/13
583-831.............................................
THAILAND: Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings A-549- 7/1/12-6/30/13
807.................................................
THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Carbon Steel Butt- 7/1/12-6/30/13
Weld Pipe Fittings A-570-814........................
THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Certain Potassium 7/1/12-6/30/13
Phosphate Salts A-570-962...........................
THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Certain Steel Grating 7/1/12-6/30/13
A-570-947...........................................
THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Circular Welded 7/1/12-6/30/13
Carbon Quality Steel Pipe A-570-910.................
THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Persulfates A-570-847 7/1/12-6/30/13
THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Saccharin A-570-878.. 7/1/12-6/30/13
TURKEY: Certain Pasta A-489-805...................... 7/1/12-6/30/13
UKRAINE: Solid Urea A-823-801........................ 7/1/12-6/30/13
Countervailing Duty Proceedings
INDIA: Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film C-533- 1/1/12-12/31/12
825.................................................
ITALY: Certain Pasta C-475-819....................... 1/1/12-12/31/12
THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Certain Potassium 1/1/12-12/31/12
Phosphate Salts C-570-963...........................
THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Certain Steel Grating 1/1/12-12/31/12
C-570-948...........................................
THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Circular Welded 1/1/12-12/31/12
Carbon Quality Steel Pipe C-570-911.................
THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Prestressed Concrete 1/1/12-12/31/12
Steel Wire Strand C-570-946.........................
TURKEY: Certain Pasta C-489-806...................... 1/1/12-12/31/12
Suspension Agreements
RUSSIA: Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products 7/1/12-6/30/13
A-821-809...........................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b), an interested party as
defined by section 771(9) of the Act may request in writing that the
Secretary conduct an administrative review. For both antidumping and
countervailing duty reviews, the interested party must specify the
individual producers or exporters covered by an antidumping finding or
an antidumping or countervailing duty order or suspension agreement for
which it is requesting a review. In addition, a domestic interested
party or an interested party described in section 771(9)(B) of the Act
must state why it desires the Secretary to review those particular
producers or exporters.\2\ If the interested party intends for the
Secretary to review sales of merchandise by an exporter (or a producer
if that producer also exports merchandise from other suppliers) which
were produced in more than one country of origin and each country of
origin is subject to a separate order, then the interested party must
state specifically, on an order-by-order basis, which exporter(s) the
request is intended to cover.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ If the review request involves a non-market economy and the
parties subject to the review request do not qualify for separate
rates, all other exporters of subject merchandise from the non-
market economy country who do not have a separate rate will be
covered by the review as part of the single entity of which the
named firms are a part.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please note that, for any party the Department was unable to locate
in prior segments, the Department will not accept a request for an
administrative review of that party absent new information as to the
party's location. Moreover, if the interested party who files a request
for review is unable to locate the producer or exporter for which it
requested the review, the interested party must provide an explanation
of the attempts it made to locate the producer or exporter at the same
time it files its request for review, in order for the Secretary to
determine if the interested party's attempts were reasonable, pursuant
to 19 CFR 351.303(f)(3)(ii).
As explained in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment ofAntidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003), and Non-
Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping
Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011) the Department has clarified its
practice with respect to the collection of final antidumping duties on
imports of merchandise where intermediate firms are involved. The
public should be aware of this clarification in determining whether to
request an administrative review of merchandise subject to antidumping
findings and orders. See also the Import Administration Web site at
https://trade.gov/ia.
All requests must be filed electronically in Import
Administration's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (``IA ACCESS'') on the IA ACCESS Web site at
https://iaaccess.trade.gov. See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective
Order Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011). Further, in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.303(f)(l)(i), a copy of each request must be served on
the petitioner and each exporter or producer specified in the request.
The Department will publish in the Federal Register a notice of
``Initiation of Administrative Review of Antidumping or Countervailing
Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation'' for requests received
by the last day of July 2013. If the Department does not receive, by
the last day of July 2013, a request for review of entries covered by
an order, finding, or suspended investigation listed in this notice and
for the period identified
[[Page 39712]]
above, the Department will instruct CBP to assess antidumping or
countervailing duties on those entries at a rate equal to the cash
deposit of (or bond for) estimated antidumping or countervailing duties
required on those entries at the time of entry, or withdrawal from
warehouse, for consumption and to continue to collect the cash deposit
previously ordered.
For the first administrative review of any order, there will be no
assessment of antidumping or countervailing duties on entries of
subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption during the relevant provisional-measures ``gap'' period, of
the order, if such a gap period is applicable to the period of review.
This notice is not required by statute but is published as a
service to the international trading community.
Dated: June 14, 2013.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2013-15761 Filed 7-1-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
