Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Modify Fees for Third Party Market Data Delivered by NASDAQ, 39383-39386 [2013-15624]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 126 / Monday, July 1, 2013 / Notices
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File No. SR–NYSEMKT–
2013–50 and should be submitted on or
before July 22, 2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.63
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–15631 Filed 6–28–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–69844; File No. SR–
NASDAQ–2013–084]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change To Modify Fees
for Third Party Market Data Delivered
by NASDAQ
June 25, 2013.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on June 14,
2013, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
(‘‘NASDAQ’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) a
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange.
The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested
persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
NASDAQ proposes to modify the
existing fees clients voluntarily pay to
receive third party market data
delivered by NASDAQ as set forth in
NASDAQ Rule 7034. NASDAQ
proposes to implement the proposed
rule change on a date that is on, or
shortly after, the expiration of the preoperative delay provided for in Rule
19b–4(f)(6)(iii).3 The text of the
proposed rule change is available on the
63 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 17 CFR 242.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
1 15
VerDate Mar<15>2010
21:38 Jun 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
Exchange’s Web site at https://
nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission,
NASDAQ included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for,
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
Wireless technology has been in
existence for many years, used primarily
by the defense, retail and
telecommunications industries.
Wireless connectivity involves the
beaming of signals through the air
between towers that are within sight of
one another. Because the signals travel
a straight, unimpeded line, and because
light waves travel faster through air than
through glass (fiber optics), message
latency is reduced. The continued use of
this technology by the defense industry
and regulation of the spectrum by the
FCC demonstrates the secure nature of
wireless networks.
Over the last year, wireless
technology has been introduced in the
financial services industry. In offering
optional wireless connectivity,
NASDAQ is responding to requests from
clients that wish to utilize the
technology. Clients have sought to buy
roof rights so that they can install their
own microwave dishes on the roof at the
NASDAQ data center in Carteret, New
Jersey. Some have already installed
microwave dishes on nearby towers
with fiber connectivity to the data
center, or have reserved space to do so.
Rather than sell roof rights to individual
clients, which would quickly result in
the lack of physical space on the data
center roof to accommodate all clients
fairly and equally, NASDAQ proposes to
supply market data, via a vendorsupplied wireless network, for all data
center clients that wish to avail
themselves of it.
PO 00000
Frm 00133
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
39383
NASDAQ is proposing to utilize
wireless technology to make available to
its co-located clients third-party data
from the CME Group, and to amend
NASDAQ Rule 7034 to modify the
existing fees for the delivery of third
party market data to market center
clients via a wireless network.
Specifically, NASDAQ will add fees for
access to third-party data from the CME
Group. NASDAQ will utilize network
vendors to supply wireless connectivity
from the Carteret data center to CME
Group’s Aurora, Illinois data center. The
vendors will install, test and maintain
the necessary communication
equipment for this wireless network
between the data centers.4
Wireless connectivity to CME Group
data is similar to existing access to other
data. Clients who choose this optional
service will use their existing NASDAQ
cross connect handoffs (1G, 10G, or
40G) to receive the multicast market
data for CME Group, and NASDAQ will
continue to act as re-distributor of the
third party market data feeds, capturing
the data at CME Group’s data centers
and transporting the data to NASDAQ’s
Carteret data center. The Exchange has
opted to offer the CME Group data that
is most in demand by NASDAQ
customers to start. Additional feeds may
be added based on overall client
demand and bandwidth availability.
CME Group data is already available
via fiber optic network, and therefore
the wireless connectivity will be an
optional offering, an alternative to fiber
optic network connectivity, and will
provide lower latency. In other words,
this proposal does not offer a new
market data product, but merely an
alternative means of connectivity.
NASDAQ’s wireless connectivity
offering, in conjunction with NASDAQ’s
equidistant cross connect handoffs (1G,
10G, or 40G), will ensure that all clients
electing to use this wireless connectivity
offering will receive the chosen market
data at the same low latency, equalizing
any variances that might otherwise
result from differences in the location of
client cabinets within the facility or
different wireless networks utilized by
clients independently of this offering.
4 The vendors supporting wireless transmission of
CME data will install equipment on transmission
towers nearby to NASDAQ and CME facilities. This
is unlike NASDAQ’s current authority to offer
different third-party data via wireless equipment
located on the rooftop of NASDAQ’s Carteret colocation facility. See Exchange Act Release No.
68735 (Jan. 25, 2013); 78 FR 6842 (Jan. 31, 2013)
(order approving SR–NASDAQ–2012–119).
Accordingly, it is unnecessary to discuss the
competitive impact of limiting roof rights to the
Carteret facility, which NASDAQ addressed in its
previous filing.
E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM
01JYN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
39384
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 126 / Monday, July 1, 2013 / Notices
To obtain CME Group data via
wireless connectivity, clients will be
charged a $5,000 installation fee (a nonrecurring charge) and a monthly
recurring charge (MRC) of $23,500 for
connectivity. The rates are higher for the
CME Group feeds compared to the other
exchange feeds because the distance
between the NASDAQ data center in
New Jersey and the CME Group data
center in Aurora, Illinois is 45 times
longer than the distances to the other
New Jersey data centers, which requires
a more extensive and expensive wireless
network to deliver this distant market
data.
Clients will place orders for the
wireless connectivity via NASDAQ’s
CoLo Console.5 As with alreadyapproved products, subscribers to CME
Group’s data via a wireless network will
be required to subscribe for a minimum
of one year, which is standard practice
for co-location offerings. The minimum
subscription period ensures that the
Exchange and vendor can recoup the
substantial investment required to
establish the wireless system. As an
incentive to clients, NASDAQ will
waive the first month’s MRC. The
proposed MRC fee covers connectivity
only; CME Group will charge data
recipients directly the user fees for the
market data received, and charge
NASDAQ redistribution fees, as occurs
today. No changes in CME Group’s
market data fees will occur as a result
of this proposed offering.
NASDAQ OMX will perform
substantial network testing prior to
offering the service for a fee to members.
After this ‘‘beta’’ testing period, upon
initial roll-out of the service, clients will
be offered the service for a fee, and on
a rolling basis, the Exchange will enable
new clients to receive the feed(s) for a
minimum of 30 days before incurring
any monthly recurring fees. The
wireless network will continue to be
closely monitored and the client
informed of any issues. Similar to
receiving market data over fiber optic
networks, the wireless network can
encounter delays or outages due to
equipment issues. As wireless networks
may be affected by severe weather
events, clients will be expected to have
redundant methods to receive this
market data and will be asked to attest
to having alternate methods or
establishing an alternate method in the
near future when they order this service
from the Exchange.
This new data feed delivery option
will be available to all clients of the data
5 The ‘‘CoLo Console’’ is a web-based ordering
tool NASDAQ offers to enable members to place colocation orders.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
21:38 Jun 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
center, and is in response to industry
demand, as well as to changes in the
technology for distributing market data.
Clients opting not to pay for the wireless
connectivity will still be able to receive
market data via fiber optics and
standard telecommunications
connections, as they do currently, and
under the same fees. Receipt of trade
data via wireless technology is
completely optional. In addition, clients
can choose to receive market data via
other third-party vendors (Extranets or
Telecommunication vendors) via fiber
optic networks or wireless networks.
The proposed fees are based on the
cost to NASDAQ and the vendor of
installing and maintaining the wireless
connectivity and on the value provided
to the customer, which receives low
latency delivery of data feeds. The costs
associated with the wireless
connectivity system are incrementally
higher than fiber optics-based solutions
due to the expense of the wireless
equipment, cost of installation and
testing and ongoing maintenance of the
network. The fees also allow NASDAQ
to make a profit, and reflect the
premium received by the clients in
terms of lower latency over the fiber
optics option. Clients can choose to
build and maintain their own wireless
networks or choose their own third
party network vendors but the upfront
and ongoing costs will be much more
substantial than this Exchange wireless
offering.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)
of the Act 6 in general, and with
Sections 6(b)(4), (b)(5) and (b)(8) of the
Act,7 in particular, in that it provides for
the equitable allocation of reasonable
dues, fees and other charges among
members and issuers and other persons
using any facility or system which the
Exchange operates or controls, and is
designed to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
general to protect investors and the
public interest. NASDAQ’s proposal to
offer wireless connectivity supports
important policy objectives of the Act,
including the broadest, fairest possible
dissemination of market data.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed fees for wireless connectivity
to NASDAQ are consistent with Section
6(b)(4) of the Act for multiple reasons.
The Exchange operates in a highly
6 15
7 15
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4), (5) and (8).
Frm 00134
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
competitive market in which exchanges
offer co-location services as a means to
facilitate the trading activities of those
members who believe that co-location
enhances the efficiency of their trading.
Accordingly, fees charged for colocation services are constrained by the
active competition for the order flow of
such members. If a particular exchange
charges excessive fees for co-location
services, affected members will opt to
terminate their co-location arrangements
with that exchange, and adopt a
possible range of alternative strategies,
including co-locating with a different
exchange, placing their servers in a
physically proximate location outside
the exchange’s data center, or pursuing
trading strategies not dependent upon
co-location. Accordingly, the exchange
charging excessive fees would stand to
lose not only co-location revenues but
also revenues associated with the
execution of orders routed to it by
affected members. Although currently
no other exchange offers wireless
connectivity, there are no constraints on
their ability to do so, and it is probable
that other exchanges will make a similar
offering in the near future. The
Exchange believes that this competitive
dynamic imposes powerful restraints on
the ability of any exchange to charge
unreasonable fees for co-location
services, including fees for wireless
connectivity.
A co-location customer may obtain a
similar service by contracting with a
wireless service provider to install the
required dishes on towers near the data
centers and paying the service provider
to maintain the service. However, the
cost involved in establishing service in
this manner is substantial and could
result in uneven access to wireless
connectivity. The Exchange’s proposed
fees will allow these clients to utilize
wireless connectivity and obtain the
lower latency transmission of data from
third parties and NASDAQ that is
available to others, at a reasonable cost.8
8 The wireless network offered by the Exchange
via the provider, although constrained by
bandwidth with respect to the number of feeds it
can carry, can be made available to an unlimited
number of customers. The factors that differentiate
this proposal from the Exchange’s offerings of and
initial fees for low latency network
telecommunication connections approved by the
Commission in Securities Exchange Act Release No.
66013 (December 20, 2011) 76 FR 80992 (December
27, 2011) (SR–NASDAQ–2011–146) are a function
of technology and program concept, but neither
approach implicates a burden on competition, for
similar reasons: Each offers, at a competitive price,
a service that customers may obtain by dealing
directly with the provider rather than the Exchange;
and each is expected to result in a reduction in fees
charged to market participants, the very essence of
competition. Pursuant to the SEC’s prior approval,
the Exchange offers customers the opportunity to
obtain low latency telecommunications
E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM
01JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 126 / Monday, July 1, 2013 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Moreover, the Exchange believes the
proposed fees for wireless connectivity
to NASDAQ are reasonable because they
are based on the Exchange’s and
vendor’s costs to cover hardware,
installation, testing and connection, as
well expenses involved in maintaining
and managing the enhanced connection.
The proposed fees allow the Exchange
to recoup these costs and make a profit,
while providing customers the ability to
reduce latency in the transmission of
data from third parties and NASDAQ,
and reducing the cost to them that
would be involved if they build or buy
their own wireless networks. The
Exchange believes that the proposed
fees are reasonable in that they reflect
the costs of the connection and the
benefit of the lower latency to clients.
The Exchange also believes that the
proposed wireless connectivity fees are
consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the
Act in that the fees are equitably
allocated and non-discriminatory. All
Exchange members that voluntarily
select this service option will be
charged the same amount for the same
services. As is true of all co-location
services, all co-located clients have the
option to select this voluntary
connectivity option, and there is no
differentiation among customers with
regard to the fees charged for the
service. Further, the latency reduction
offered will be the same for all colocated clients, irrespective of the
locations of their cabinets within the
data center. The same cannot be said of
the alternative where entities with
substantial resources invest in private
services and thereby obtain lower
connectivity by establishing a low-latency
minimum standard and negotiating with multiple
telecommunication providers to obtain discounted
rates. It then passes these wholesale rates along to
participating customers, with a markup to
compensate for the Exchange’s role in negotiating
and establishing the arrangement, and integrating
and maintaining each new connection. Co-located
customers are free to choose the provider they wish
to use from those participating in the program; or
they may choose not to avail themselves of the
service and obtain comparable services directly
from the provider. The Exchange does not
discriminate among telecommunications providers
in its program, so long as they meet the required
latency, destination, and fee standards. Wireless
technology, in contrast, does not require separate
avenues of connectivity for each customer, and thus
the Exchange is not obtaining a wholesale price by
negotiating with service providers. Rather, it is
selecting, on a competitive basis, the service
provider(s) to install and maintain the system, and
charging customers for access to that particular
system, offering lower prices because it is spreading
the substantial cost among multiple clients. The
program, far from burdening competition among
connectivity service providers, promotes it. A
wireless provider that can offer to the Exchange—
or to a competitor exchange—a lower price for
installation and maintenance will no doubt get the
exchanges’ business, with the end result that prices
for the end users will go down.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:43 Jun 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
latency transmission, while those
without resources are unable to invest
in the necessary infrastructure.
The Exchange’s proposal is also
consistent with the requirement of
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act that Exchange
rules be designed to prevent fraudulent
and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in
regulating, clearing, settling, processing
information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to
remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest; and are not designed to
permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
The proposal is consistent with these
requirements insomuch as it makes
available to market participants, at a
reasonable fee and on a nondiscriminatory basis, access to low
latency means of receiving market data
feeds. Some market participants have
already adopted wireless technology,
using towers near the data centers, and
others have approached the Exchange
seeking to rent roof rights to mount their
towers. Rather than lease out roof space
to the highest bidders, a process that
would stratify and limit access to the
low latency delivery, this approach
allows unlimited numbers of users to
utilize the this Exchange service which
utilizes vendors who rely on nearby
towers to house the wireless equipment
to receive the market data. It will allow
the same low latency delivery to those
unable to invest in the more expensive
option of building or acquiring their
own wireless network, as it does for
those whose pockets are deeper.
Initially, NASDAQ will perform
substantial network testing prior to
making the service available to
members. After this testing period, the
wireless network will continue to be
closely monitored and maintained by
the vendor and the client will be
informed of any issues. Additionally,
during the initial roll-out of the service
and on a rolling basis for future clients,
the Exchange will enable clients to test
the receipt of the feed(s) for a minimum
of 30 days before incurring any monthly
recurring fees. Similar to receiving
market data over fiber optic networks,
the wireless network can encounter
delays or outages due to equipment
issues. As wireless networks may be
affected by severe weather events,
clients will be expected to have
redundant methods to receive this
market data and will be asked to attest
to having alternate methods or
PO 00000
Frm 00135
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
39385
establishing an alternate method in the
near future when they order this service
from the Exchange.
Finally, for the reasons stated below
in Section 4 of Form 19b-4, the
proposed fees for wireless connectivity
are consistent with Section 6(b)(8) of the
Act in that they do not impose a burden
on competition not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
NASDAQ does not believe that the
proposed rule change will result in any
burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act, as amended.
To the contrary, this proposal will
promote competition for distribution of
market data by offering an optional and
innovative product enhancement.
Wireless technology has been in use for
decades, is available from multiple
providers, and may be adopted by other
exchanges that decide to offer
microwave connectivity for delivery of
market data. As discussed above, the
Exchange believes that fees for colocation services, including those
proposed for microwave connectivity,
are constrained by the robust
competition for order flow among
exchanges and non-exchange markets,
because co-location exists to advance
that competition. Further, excessive fees
for co-location services, including for
wireless technology, would serve to
impair an exchange’s ability to compete
for order flow rather than burdening
competition.
Furthermore, there are multiple
effective competitive alternatives to
NASDAQ’s wireless offering. NASDAQ
has no arrangement with CME that
limits the ability of CME to transmit
CME data via alternative wireless
providers. Additionally, NASDAQ does
not limit the ability of alternative
wireless providers to re-transmit data
received from CME either outside of or
within NASDAQ’s co-location facility.
A competitive network provides the
same or similar data, at the same or
similar speed, at the same or similar
cost, and NASDAQ’s proposal does
nothing to inhibit or constrain this.
Currently, 17 market data vendors have
fiber optic cables connected to
NASDAQ’s telco room in Carteret, and
NASDAQ believes at least ten wireless
networks exist or are under construction
within very close proximity to the
Carteret facility.9 That number can, and
9 This belief is based on a review conducted for
NASDAQ of publicly-available registration and
E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM
Continued
01JYN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
39386
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 126 / Monday, July 1, 2013 / Notices
likely will, grow, and nothing in the
proposal inhibits additional wireless
vendors accessing or providing CME
data. Any or all of those vendors and
networks is an effective competitor to
the NASDAQ wireless offering. A
market data vendor could also induce
purchasers away from NASDAQ with an
ever-so-slightly slower but still valuable
product at a lower price. This variety of
price and speed attributes is an effective
constraint on NASDAQ’s pricing power.
Moreover, fiber optic networks are
themselves effective competitors for
wireless data. As stated above, 17
vendors currently offer connectivity to
the NASDAQ data center at various,
competing prices. Fiber optic networks
are more resilient than wireless
networks, which can be more
susceptible to severe weather affects;
this mature market for fiber optic
networks will remain attractive to many
clients who are more risk averse. While
some NASDAQ firms will opt for faster,
costlier wireless data, many others will
conclude that the price and speed
attributes of fiber optic data provide a
reasonable competitive alternative to
wireless data.
Competition between the Exchange
and competing trading venues will be
enhanced by allowing the Exchange to
offer its market participants a lower
latency connectivity option.
Competition among market participants
will also be supported by allowing small
and large participants the same price for
this lower latency connectivity.
The proposed rule change will
likewise enhance competition among
service providers offering connections
between market participants and the
data centers. The offering will expand
the multiple means of connectivity
available, allowing customers to
compare the benefits and costs of lower
latency transmission and related costs
with reference to numerous variables.
The Exchange, and presumably its
competitors, selects service providers on
a competitive basis in order to pass
along price advantages to its customers
to win and maintain their business. The
offering is consistent with the
Exchange’s own economic incentives to
facilitate as many market participants as
possible in connecting to its market.
spectrum reservation databases at the Federal
Communications Commission. While it is difficult
to state a definitive number of active vendors,
NASDAQ can state categorically that multiple
vendors currently provide wireless services such as
NASDAQ is proposing to provide via this proposed
rule change.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
21:38 Jun 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither
solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule
change does not: (i) Significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) become
operative for 30 days from the date on
which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate, it has
become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii)[sic] of the Act 10 and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b–4
thereunder.11 At any time within 60
days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–NASDAQ–2013–084 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NASDAQ–2013–084. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–
NASDAQ–2013–084 and should be
submitted on or before July 22, 2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.12
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–15624 Filed 6–28–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–69855; File No. SR–EDGX–
2013–21]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; EDGX
Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change to Offer and Establish
Fees for a New Exchange Service,
EdgeRisk Gateways
June 25, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on June 14,
2013, EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGX’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which items have been prepared
by the self-regulatory organization. The
Exchange has designated the proposed
rule change as it pertains to the fees for
EdgeRisk Gateway SM (the ‘‘Service’’) as
‘‘establishing or charging a due, fee or
12 17
10 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(a)(ii)[sic].
11 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
PO 00000
Frm 00136
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM
01JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 126 (Monday, July 1, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39383-39386]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-15624]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-69844; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2013-084]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Modify Fees for Third Party Market Data Delivered by NASDAQ
June 25, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on June 14, 2013, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``NASDAQ'' or the
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') a proposed rule change as described in Items I, II and
III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
NASDAQ proposes to modify the existing fees clients voluntarily pay
to receive third party market data delivered by NASDAQ as set forth in
NASDAQ Rule 7034. NASDAQ proposes to implement the proposed rule change
on a date that is on, or shortly after, the expiration of the pre-
operative delay provided for in Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii).\3\ The text of
the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site at
https://nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com, at the principal office of the
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ 17 CFR 242.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, NASDAQ included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of those statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
Wireless technology has been in existence for many years, used
primarily by the defense, retail and telecommunications industries.
Wireless connectivity involves the beaming of signals through the air
between towers that are within sight of one another. Because the
signals travel a straight, unimpeded line, and because light waves
travel faster through air than through glass (fiber optics), message
latency is reduced. The continued use of this technology by the defense
industry and regulation of the spectrum by the FCC demonstrates the
secure nature of wireless networks.
Over the last year, wireless technology has been introduced in the
financial services industry. In offering optional wireless
connectivity, NASDAQ is responding to requests from clients that wish
to utilize the technology. Clients have sought to buy roof rights so
that they can install their own microwave dishes on the roof at the
NASDAQ data center in Carteret, New Jersey. Some have already installed
microwave dishes on nearby towers with fiber connectivity to the data
center, or have reserved space to do so. Rather than sell roof rights
to individual clients, which would quickly result in the lack of
physical space on the data center roof to accommodate all clients
fairly and equally, NASDAQ proposes to supply market data, via a
vendor-supplied wireless network, for all data center clients that wish
to avail themselves of it.
NASDAQ is proposing to utilize wireless technology to make
available to its co-located clients third-party data from the CME
Group, and to amend NASDAQ Rule 7034 to modify the existing fees for
the delivery of third party market data to market center clients via a
wireless network. Specifically, NASDAQ will add fees for access to
third-party data from the CME Group. NASDAQ will utilize network
vendors to supply wireless connectivity from the Carteret data center
to CME Group's Aurora, Illinois data center. The vendors will install,
test and maintain the necessary communication equipment for this
wireless network between the data centers.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The vendors supporting wireless transmission of CME data
will install equipment on transmission towers nearby to NASDAQ and
CME facilities. This is unlike NASDAQ's current authority to offer
different third-party data via wireless equipment located on the
rooftop of NASDAQ's Carteret co-location facility. See Exchange Act
Release No. 68735 (Jan. 25, 2013); 78 FR 6842 (Jan. 31, 2013) (order
approving SR-NASDAQ-2012-119). Accordingly, it is unnecessary to
discuss the competitive impact of limiting roof rights to the
Carteret facility, which NASDAQ addressed in its previous filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wireless connectivity to CME Group data is similar to existing
access to other data. Clients who choose this optional service will use
their existing NASDAQ cross connect handoffs (1G, 10G, or 40G) to
receive the multicast market data for CME Group, and NASDAQ will
continue to act as re-distributor of the third party market data feeds,
capturing the data at CME Group's data centers and transporting the
data to NASDAQ's Carteret data center. The Exchange has opted to offer
the CME Group data that is most in demand by NASDAQ customers to start.
Additional feeds may be added based on overall client demand and
bandwidth availability.
CME Group data is already available via fiber optic network, and
therefore the wireless connectivity will be an optional offering, an
alternative to fiber optic network connectivity, and will provide lower
latency. In other words, this proposal does not offer a new market data
product, but merely an alternative means of connectivity. NASDAQ's
wireless connectivity offering, in conjunction with NASDAQ's
equidistant cross connect handoffs (1G, 10G, or 40G), will ensure that
all clients electing to use this wireless connectivity offering will
receive the chosen market data at the same low latency, equalizing any
variances that might otherwise result from differences in the location
of client cabinets within the facility or different wireless networks
utilized by clients independently of this offering.
[[Page 39384]]
To obtain CME Group data via wireless connectivity, clients will be
charged a $5,000 installation fee (a non-recurring charge) and a
monthly recurring charge (MRC) of $23,500 for connectivity. The rates
are higher for the CME Group feeds compared to the other exchange feeds
because the distance between the NASDAQ data center in New Jersey and
the CME Group data center in Aurora, Illinois is 45 times longer than
the distances to the other New Jersey data centers, which requires a
more extensive and expensive wireless network to deliver this distant
market data.
Clients will place orders for the wireless connectivity via
NASDAQ's CoLo Console.\5\ As with already-approved products,
subscribers to CME Group's data via a wireless network will be required
to subscribe for a minimum of one year, which is standard practice for
co-location offerings. The minimum subscription period ensures that the
Exchange and vendor can recoup the substantial investment required to
establish the wireless system. As an incentive to clients, NASDAQ will
waive the first month's MRC. The proposed MRC fee covers connectivity
only; CME Group will charge data recipients directly the user fees for
the market data received, and charge NASDAQ redistribution fees, as
occurs today. No changes in CME Group's market data fees will occur as
a result of this proposed offering.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The ``CoLo Console'' is a web-based ordering tool NASDAQ
offers to enable members to place co-location orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
NASDAQ OMX will perform substantial network testing prior to
offering the service for a fee to members. After this ``beta'' testing
period, upon initial roll-out of the service, clients will be offered
the service for a fee, and on a rolling basis, the Exchange will enable
new clients to receive the feed(s) for a minimum of 30 days before
incurring any monthly recurring fees. The wireless network will
continue to be closely monitored and the client informed of any issues.
Similar to receiving market data over fiber optic networks, the
wireless network can encounter delays or outages due to equipment
issues. As wireless networks may be affected by severe weather events,
clients will be expected to have redundant methods to receive this
market data and will be asked to attest to having alternate methods or
establishing an alternate method in the near future when they order
this service from the Exchange.
This new data feed delivery option will be available to all clients
of the data center, and is in response to industry demand, as well as
to changes in the technology for distributing market data. Clients
opting not to pay for the wireless connectivity will still be able to
receive market data via fiber optics and standard telecommunications
connections, as they do currently, and under the same fees. Receipt of
trade data via wireless technology is completely optional. In addition,
clients can choose to receive market data via other third-party vendors
(Extranets or Telecommunication vendors) via fiber optic networks or
wireless networks.
The proposed fees are based on the cost to NASDAQ and the vendor of
installing and maintaining the wireless connectivity and on the value
provided to the customer, which receives low latency delivery of data
feeds. The costs associated with the wireless connectivity system are
incrementally higher than fiber optics-based solutions due to the
expense of the wireless equipment, cost of installation and testing and
ongoing maintenance of the network. The fees also allow NASDAQ to make
a profit, and reflect the premium received by the clients in terms of
lower latency over the fiber optics option. Clients can choose to build
and maintain their own wireless networks or choose their own third
party network vendors but the upfront and ongoing costs will be much
more substantial than this Exchange wireless offering.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act \6\ in general, and with Sections 6(b)(4), (b)(5) and
(b)(8) of the Act,\7\ in particular, in that it provides for the
equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among
members and issuers and other persons using any facility or system
which the Exchange operates or controls, and is designed to promote
just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general to protect investors and the public interest.
NASDAQ's proposal to offer wireless connectivity supports important
policy objectives of the Act, including the broadest, fairest possible
dissemination of market data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4), (5) and (8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the proposed fees for wireless
connectivity to NASDAQ are consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act
for multiple reasons. The Exchange operates in a highly competitive
market in which exchanges offer co-location services as a means to
facilitate the trading activities of those members who believe that co-
location enhances the efficiency of their trading. Accordingly, fees
charged for co-location services are constrained by the active
competition for the order flow of such members. If a particular
exchange charges excessive fees for co-location services, affected
members will opt to terminate their co-location arrangements with that
exchange, and adopt a possible range of alternative strategies,
including co-locating with a different exchange, placing their servers
in a physically proximate location outside the exchange's data center,
or pursuing trading strategies not dependent upon co-location.
Accordingly, the exchange charging excessive fees would stand to lose
not only co-location revenues but also revenues associated with the
execution of orders routed to it by affected members. Although
currently no other exchange offers wireless connectivity, there are no
constraints on their ability to do so, and it is probable that other
exchanges will make a similar offering in the near future. The Exchange
believes that this competitive dynamic imposes powerful restraints on
the ability of any exchange to charge unreasonable fees for co-location
services, including fees for wireless connectivity.
A co-location customer may obtain a similar service by contracting
with a wireless service provider to install the required dishes on
towers near the data centers and paying the service provider to
maintain the service. However, the cost involved in establishing
service in this manner is substantial and could result in uneven access
to wireless connectivity. The Exchange's proposed fees will allow these
clients to utilize wireless connectivity and obtain the lower latency
transmission of data from third parties and NASDAQ that is available to
others, at a reasonable cost.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ The wireless network offered by the Exchange via the
provider, although constrained by bandwidth with respect to the
number of feeds it can carry, can be made available to an unlimited
number of customers. The factors that differentiate this proposal
from the Exchange's offerings of and initial fees for low latency
network telecommunication connections approved by the Commission in
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66013 (December 20, 2011) 76 FR
80992 (December 27, 2011) (SR-NASDAQ-2011-146) are a function of
technology and program concept, but neither approach implicates a
burden on competition, for similar reasons: Each offers, at a
competitive price, a service that customers may obtain by dealing
directly with the provider rather than the Exchange; and each is
expected to result in a reduction in fees charged to market
participants, the very essence of competition. Pursuant to the SEC's
prior approval, the Exchange offers customers the opportunity to
obtain low latency telecommunications connectivity by establishing a
low-latency minimum standard and negotiating with multiple
telecommunication providers to obtain discounted rates. It then
passes these wholesale rates along to participating customers, with
a markup to compensate for the Exchange's role in negotiating and
establishing the arrangement, and integrating and maintaining each
new connection. Co-located customers are free to choose the provider
they wish to use from those participating in the program; or they
may choose not to avail themselves of the service and obtain
comparable services directly from the provider. The Exchange does
not discriminate among telecommunications providers in its program,
so long as they meet the required latency, destination, and fee
standards. Wireless technology, in contrast, does not require
separate avenues of connectivity for each customer, and thus the
Exchange is not obtaining a wholesale price by negotiating with
service providers. Rather, it is selecting, on a competitive basis,
the service provider(s) to install and maintain the system, and
charging customers for access to that particular system, offering
lower prices because it is spreading the substantial cost among
multiple clients. The program, far from burdening competition among
connectivity service providers, promotes it. A wireless provider
that can offer to the Exchange--or to a competitor exchange--a lower
price for installation and maintenance will no doubt get the
exchanges' business, with the end result that prices for the end
users will go down.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 39385]]
Moreover, the Exchange believes the proposed fees for wireless
connectivity to NASDAQ are reasonable because they are based on the
Exchange's and vendor's costs to cover hardware, installation, testing
and connection, as well expenses involved in maintaining and managing
the enhanced connection. The proposed fees allow the Exchange to recoup
these costs and make a profit, while providing customers the ability to
reduce latency in the transmission of data from third parties and
NASDAQ, and reducing the cost to them that would be involved if they
build or buy their own wireless networks. The Exchange believes that
the proposed fees are reasonable in that they reflect the costs of the
connection and the benefit of the lower latency to clients.
The Exchange also believes that the proposed wireless connectivity
fees are consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act in that the fees
are equitably allocated and non-discriminatory. All Exchange members
that voluntarily select this service option will be charged the same
amount for the same services. As is true of all co-location services,
all co-located clients have the option to select this voluntary
connectivity option, and there is no differentiation among customers
with regard to the fees charged for the service. Further, the latency
reduction offered will be the same for all co-located clients,
irrespective of the locations of their cabinets within the data center.
The same cannot be said of the alternative where entities with
substantial resources invest in private services and thereby obtain
lower latency transmission, while those without resources are unable to
invest in the necessary infrastructure.
The Exchange's proposal is also consistent with the requirement of
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act that Exchange rules be designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination
with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing
information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest; and are not designed to
permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or
dealers.
The proposal is consistent with these requirements insomuch as it
makes available to market participants, at a reasonable fee and on a
non-discriminatory basis, access to low latency means of receiving
market data feeds. Some market participants have already adopted
wireless technology, using towers near the data centers, and others
have approached the Exchange seeking to rent roof rights to mount their
towers. Rather than lease out roof space to the highest bidders, a
process that would stratify and limit access to the low latency
delivery, this approach allows unlimited numbers of users to utilize
the this Exchange service which utilizes vendors who rely on nearby
towers to house the wireless equipment to receive the market data. It
will allow the same low latency delivery to those unable to invest in
the more expensive option of building or acquiring their own wireless
network, as it does for those whose pockets are deeper.
Initially, NASDAQ will perform substantial network testing prior to
making the service available to members. After this testing period, the
wireless network will continue to be closely monitored and maintained
by the vendor and the client will be informed of any issues.
Additionally, during the initial roll-out of the service and on a
rolling basis for future clients, the Exchange will enable clients to
test the receipt of the feed(s) for a minimum of 30 days before
incurring any monthly recurring fees. Similar to receiving market data
over fiber optic networks, the wireless network can encounter delays or
outages due to equipment issues. As wireless networks may be affected
by severe weather events, clients will be expected to have redundant
methods to receive this market data and will be asked to attest to
having alternate methods or establishing an alternate method in the
near future when they order this service from the Exchange.
Finally, for the reasons stated below in Section 4 of Form 19b-4,
the proposed fees for wireless connectivity are consistent with Section
6(b)(8) of the Act in that they do not impose a burden on competition
not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
NASDAQ does not believe that the proposed rule change will result
in any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended. To the contrary,
this proposal will promote competition for distribution of market data
by offering an optional and innovative product enhancement. Wireless
technology has been in use for decades, is available from multiple
providers, and may be adopted by other exchanges that decide to offer
microwave connectivity for delivery of market data. As discussed above,
the Exchange believes that fees for co-location services, including
those proposed for microwave connectivity, are constrained by the
robust competition for order flow among exchanges and non-exchange
markets, because co-location exists to advance that competition.
Further, excessive fees for co-location services, including for
wireless technology, would serve to impair an exchange's ability to
compete for order flow rather than burdening competition.
Furthermore, there are multiple effective competitive alternatives
to NASDAQ's wireless offering. NASDAQ has no arrangement with CME that
limits the ability of CME to transmit CME data via alternative wireless
providers. Additionally, NASDAQ does not limit the ability of
alternative wireless providers to re-transmit data received from CME
either outside of or within NASDAQ's co-location facility. A
competitive network provides the same or similar data, at the same or
similar speed, at the same or similar cost, and NASDAQ's proposal does
nothing to inhibit or constrain this. Currently, 17 market data vendors
have fiber optic cables connected to NASDAQ's telco room in Carteret,
and NASDAQ believes at least ten wireless networks exist or are under
construction within very close proximity to the Carteret facility.\9\
That number can, and
[[Page 39386]]
likely will, grow, and nothing in the proposal inhibits additional
wireless vendors accessing or providing CME data. Any or all of those
vendors and networks is an effective competitor to the NASDAQ wireless
offering. A market data vendor could also induce purchasers away from
NASDAQ with an ever-so-slightly slower but still valuable product at a
lower price. This variety of price and speed attributes is an effective
constraint on NASDAQ's pricing power.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ This belief is based on a review conducted for NASDAQ of
publicly-available registration and spectrum reservation databases
at the Federal Communications Commission. While it is difficult to
state a definitive number of active vendors, NASDAQ can state
categorically that multiple vendors currently provide wireless
services such as NASDAQ is proposing to provide via this proposed
rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Moreover, fiber optic networks are themselves effective competitors
for wireless data. As stated above, 17 vendors currently offer
connectivity to the NASDAQ data center at various, competing prices.
Fiber optic networks are more resilient than wireless networks, which
can be more susceptible to severe weather affects; this mature market
for fiber optic networks will remain attractive to many clients who are
more risk averse. While some NASDAQ firms will opt for faster, costlier
wireless data, many others will conclude that the price and speed
attributes of fiber optic data provide a reasonable competitive
alternative to wireless data.
Competition between the Exchange and competing trading venues will
be enhanced by allowing the Exchange to offer its market participants a
lower latency connectivity option. Competition among market
participants will also be supported by allowing small and large
participants the same price for this lower latency connectivity.
The proposed rule change will likewise enhance competition among
service providers offering connections between market participants and
the data centers. The offering will expand the multiple means of
connectivity available, allowing customers to compare the benefits and
costs of lower latency transmission and related costs with reference to
numerous variables. The Exchange, and presumably its competitors,
selects service providers on a competitive basis in order to pass along
price advantages to its customers to win and maintain their business.
The offering is consistent with the Exchange's own economic incentives
to facilitate as many market participants as possible in connecting to
its market.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii)[sic] of the Act \10\ and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\11\ At any time within 60
days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission
summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(a)(ii)[sic].
\11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please
include File Number SR-NASDAQ-2013-084 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2013-084. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2013-084 and should
be submitted on or before July 22, 2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\12\
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2013-15624 Filed 6-28-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P