Final Priority-National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research-Rehabilitation Research and Training Centers, 38840-38842 [2013-15605]
Download as PDF
38840
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 125 / Friday, June 28, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
§ 165.506 Safety Zones; Fireworks
Displays in the Fifth Coast Guard District
No.
Date
Location
Regulated area
(a) Coast Guard Sector Delaware Bay—COTP Zone
*
17 ......................
*
July 5 ................
*
*
*
*
*
Barnegat Bay, Barnegat Township, NJ, Safety Zone..
*
*
*
*
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Chapter III
Final Priority—National Institute on
Disability and Rehabilitation
Research—Rehabilitation Research
and Training Centers
Office of Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services, Department of
Education.
ACTION: Final priority.
AGENCY:
[CFDA Number: 84.133B–8]
The Assistant Secretary for
Special Education and Rehabilitative
Services announces a priority for the
Disability and Rehabilitation Research
Projects and Centers Program
administered by the National Institute
on Disability and Rehabilitation
Research (NIDRR). Specifically, we
announce a priority for a Rehabilitation
Research and Training Center (RRTC) on
Disability in Rural Areas. The Assistant
Secretary may use this priority for
competitions in fiscal year (FY) 2013
and later years. We take this action to
focus research attention on areas of
national need. We intend this priority to
improve outcomes among individuals
with disabilities in rural areas.
DATES: This priority is effective July 29,
2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marlene Spencer, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW.,
Room 5133, Potomac Center Plaza
(PCP), Washington, DC 20202–2700.
Telephone: (202) 245–7532 or by email:
marlene.spencer@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
18:17 Jun 27, 2013
Jkt 229001
*
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[FR Doc. 2013–15499 Filed 6–27–13; 8:45 am]
VerDate Mar<15>2010
*
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay
Service (FRS), toll free, at 1–800–877–
8339.
*
Dated: May 30, 2013.
K. Moore,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Sector Delaware Bay.
SUMMARY:
*
*
*
The waters of Barnegat Bay within a 500 yard radius of the fireworks
barge in approximate position latitude 39°44′50″ N, longitude
074°11′21″ W, approximately 500 yards north of Conklin Island,
NJ.
Purpose of Program: The purpose of
the Disability and Rehabilitation
Research Projects and Centers Program
is to plan and conduct research,
demonstration projects, training, and
related activities, including
international activities, to develop
methods, procedures, and rehabilitation
technology that maximize the full
inclusion and integration into society,
employment, independent living, family
support, and economic and social selfsufficiency of individuals with
disabilities, especially individuals with
the most severe disabilities, and to
improve the effectiveness of services
authorized under the Rehabilitation Act
of 1973, as amended (Rehabilitation
Act).
Rehabilitation Research and Training
Centers
The purpose of the RRTCs, which are
funded through the Disability and
Rehabilitation Research Projects and
Centers Program, is to achieve the goals
of the Rehabilitation Act, as amended,
through advanced research, training,
technical assistance, and dissemination
activities in general problem areas, as
specified by NIDRR. These activities are
designed to benefit rehabilitation
service providers, individuals with
disabilities, and the family members or
other authorized representatives of
individuals with disabilities. Additional
information on the RRTC program can
be found at: www.ed.gov/rschstat/
research/pubs/res-program.html#RRTC.
Program Authority: 29 U.S.C. 762(g) and
764(b)(2).
Applicable Program Regulations: 34
CFR part 350.
We published a notice of proposed
priority (NPP) in the Federal Register
on May 7, 2013 (78 FR 26560). That
notice contained background
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
information and our reasons for
proposing the particular priority.
Except for minor technical revisions,
there are no differences between the
proposed priority and the final priority.
Public Comment: In response to our
invitation in the NPP, we did not
receive any comments on the proposed
priority.
Final Priority
RRTC on Disability in Rural Areas.
The Assistant Secretary for Special
Education and Rehabilitative Services
establishes a priority for a Rehabilitation
Research and Training Center (RRTC) on
Disability in Rural Areas. This RRTC
must conduct rigorous research, and
provide training, technical assistance,
and information to improve the
outcomes of individuals with
disabilities who live in rural areas. The
RRTC must:
(a) Conduct research that examines
experiences and outcomes of
individuals with disabilities who live in
rural areas and apply the research
findings to develop interventions that
improve those outcomes. Applicants
must focus their research activities on
topics that fall under at least one of the
following major life domains identified
in NIDRR’s Long-Range Plan for Fiscal
Years 2013–2017 (78 FR 20299):
Employment, Community Living and
Participation, or Health and Function;
(b) Serve as a national resource center
for individuals with disabilities living
in rural areas, their families, service and
support providers, and other
stakeholders by conducting knowledge
translation activities that include, but
are not limited to:
(1) Providing information and
technical assistance to service
providers, individuals with disabilities
living in rural areas and their
representatives, and other key
stakeholders;
(2) Providing training, including
graduate, pre-service, and in-service
training, to rehabilitation service
providers and other disability service
E:\FR\FM\28JNR1.SGM
28JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 125 / Friday, June 28, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
providers, to facilitate more effective
delivery of services to individuals with
disabilities living in rural areas. This
training may be provided through
conferences, workshops, public
education programs, in-service training
programs, and similar activities;
(3) Disseminating research-based
information and materials related to
living with a disability in rural areas;
and
(c) Involve individuals with
disabilities who live in rural areas in
planning and implementing the RRTC’s
activities, and in evaluating the RRTC’s
work.
Types of Priorities:
When inviting applications for a
competition using one or more
priorities, we designate the type of each
priority as absolute, competitive
preference, or invitational through a
notice in the Federal Register. The
effect of each type of priority follows:
Absolute priority: Under an absolute
priority, we consider only applications
that meet the priority (34 CFR
75.105(c)(3)).
Competitive preference priority:
Under a competitive preference priority,
we give competitive preference to an
application by (1) awarding additional
points, depending on the extent to
which the application meets the priority
(34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i)); or (2) selecting
an application that meets the priority
over an application of comparable merit
that does not meet the priority (34 CFR
75.105(c)(2)(ii)).
Invitational priority: Under an
invitational priority, we are particularly
interested in applications that meet the
priority. However, we do not give an
application that meets the priority a
preference over other applications (34
CFR 75.105(c)(1)).
This notice does not preclude us from
proposing additional priorities,
requirements, definitions, or selection
criteria, subject to meeting applicable
rulemaking requirements.
Note: This notice does not solicit
applications. In any year in which we choose
to use this priority, we invite applications
through a notice in the Federal Register.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Regulatory Impact Analysis
Under Executive Order 12866, the
Secretary must determine whether this
regulatory action is ‘‘significant’’ and,
therefore, subject to the requirements of
the Executive order and subject to
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB). Section 3(f) of Executive
Order 12866 defines a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ as an action likely to
result in a rule that may—
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:54 Jun 27, 2013
Jkt 229001
(1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more, or
adversely affect a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
State, local or tribal governments or
communities in a material way (also
referred to as an ‘‘economically
significant’’ rule);
(2) Create serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken
or planned by another agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary
impacts of entitlement grants, user fees,
or loan programs or the rights and
obligations of recipients thereof; or
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues
arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
stated in the Executive order.
This final regulatory action is not a
significant regulatory action subject to
review by OMB under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866.
We have also reviewed this final
regulatory action under Executive Order
13563, which supplements and
explicitly reaffirms the principles,
structures, and definitions governing
regulatory review established in
Executive Order 12866. To the extent
permitted by law, Executive Order
13563 requires that an agency—
(1) Propose or adopt regulations only
upon a reasoned determination that
their benefits justify their costs
(recognizing that some benefits and
costs are difficult to quantify);
(2) Tailor its regulations to impose the
least burden on society, consistent with
obtaining regulatory objectives and
taking into account—among other things
and to the extent practicable—the costs
of cumulative regulations;
(3) In choosing among alternative
regulatory approaches, select those
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety,
and other advantages; distributive
impacts; and equity);
(4) To the extent feasible, specify
performance objectives, rather than the
behavior or manner of compliance a
regulated entity must adopt; and
(5) Identify and assess available
alternatives to direct regulation,
including economic incentives—such as
user fees or marketable permits—to
encourage the desired behavior, or
provide information that enables the
public to make choices.
Executive Order 13563 also requires
an agency ‘‘to use the best available
techniques to quantify anticipated
present and future benefits and costs as
accurately as possible.’’ The Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs of
OMB has emphasized that these
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
38841
techniques may include ‘‘identifying
changing future compliance costs that
might result from technological
innovation or anticipated behavioral
changes.’’
We are issuing this final priority only
on a reasoned determination that its
benefits justify its costs. In choosing
among alternative regulatory
approaches, we selected those
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Based on the analysis that follows, the
Department believes that this regulatory
action is consistent with the principles
in Executive Order 13563.
We also have determined that this
regulatory action does not unduly
interfere with State, local, and tribal
governments in the exercise of their
governmental functions.
In accordance with both Executive
orders, the Department has assessed the
potential costs and benefits, both
quantitative and qualitative, of this
regulatory action. The potential costs
are those resulting from statutory
requirements and those we have
determined as necessary for
administering the Department’s
programs and activities.
The benefits of the Disability and
Rehabilitation Research Projects and
Centers Program have been well
established over the years, as projects
similar to the one envisioned by the
final priority have been completed
successfully. The new RRTC will
generate and promote the use of new
knowledge that will improve the
options for individuals with disabilities
to perform regular activities of their
choice in the community.
Accessible Format: Individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document in
an accessible format (e.g., braille, large
print, audiotape, or compact disc) on
request to the program contact person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
Electronic Access to This Document:
The official version of this document is
the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register
and the Code of Federal Regulations is
available via the Federal Digital System
at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you
can view this document, as well as all
other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF). To use PDF you must
have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the
Department published in the Federal
Register by using the article search
feature at: www.federalregister.gov.
Specifically, through the advanced
E:\FR\FM\28JNR1.SGM
28JNR1
38842
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 125 / Friday, June 28, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
search feature at this site, you can limit
your search to documents published by
the Department.
Dated: June 25, 2013.
Michael K. Yudin,
Delegated the authority to perform the
functions and duties of the Assistant
Secretary for Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services.
[FR Doc. 2013–15605 Filed 6–27–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
36 CFR Part 251
RIN 0596–AD12
Definition of a Ski Area
Forest Service, USDA.
Interim final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Forest Service is
amending the definition of a ski area in
its regulations to make it consistent with
the authority in section 3 of the Ski Area
Recreational Opportunity Enhancement
Act (SAROEA) of 2011 to allow
authorization of other snow sports
besides Nordic and alpine skiing and, in
appropriate circumstances, other
seasonal and year-round natural
resource-based recreation activities and
associated facilities at ski areas on
National Forest System (NFS) lands,
provided that authorization of these
other activities and facilities would not
change the primary purpose of the ski
areas to a purpose other than skiing and
other snow sports.
DATES: The rule is effective July 29,
2013.
ADDRESSES: Send comments
electronically by following the
instructions at the Federal eRulemaking
portal at https://www.regulations.gov.
Comments also may be submitted by
mail to USDA Forest Service Ski Area
Definition Comments, GMUG National
Forest, 2250 Highway 50, Delta, CO
81416. If comments are sent
electronically, duplicate comments
should not be sent by mail. Receipt of
comments cannot be confirmed.
All comments, including names and
addresses when provided, will be
placed in the record and will be made
available for public review and copying.
Those wishing to review comments
should call Corey Wong at (970) 874–
6668 to schedule an appointment.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Corey Wong, Acting National Winter
Sports Program Manager, 970–874–
6668. Individuals who use
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:54 Jun 27, 2013
Jkt 229001
telecommunication devices for the deaf
may call the Federal Information Relay
Service at 800–877–8339 between 8:00
a.m. and 8:00 p.m., Eastern Daylight
Time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 3
of SAROEA amended the National
Forest Ski Area Permit Act of 1986 (16
U.S.C. 497b) to allow authorization of
other snow sports besides Nordic and
alpine skiing at ski areas on NFS lands,
such as snowboarding, sledding, and
tubing. Section 3 of SAROEA also
amended 16 U.S.C. 497b to allow
authorization, in appropriate
circumstances, of other seasonal and
year-round natural resource-based
recreation activities and associated
facilities at ski areas on NFS lands,
provided that authorization of these
other activities and facilities would not
change the primary purpose of the ski
areas to a purpose other than skiing and
other snow sports.
The definition for a ski area in Forest
Service regulations at 36 CFR 251.51
implementing the National Forest Ski
Area Permit Act provides for
development only for Nordic and alpine
skiing at ski areas on NFS lands and
limits ancillary facilities at ski areas on
NFS lands to those that support skiing.
Accordingly, the Department is
amending the definition for a ski area in
36 CFR 251.51 to provide for
development for snow sports besides
Nordic and alpine skiing at ski areas on
NFS lands and to provide, in
appropriate circumstances, for facilities
necessary for other seasonal and yearround natural resource-based recreation
activities at ski areas on NFS lands,
provided that authorization of these
other activities and facilities would not
change the primary purpose of the ski
area to a purpose other than skiing and
other snow sports.
The Department is expanding the
requirement in the current definition of
a ski area in 36 CFR 251.51 that the
preponderance of revenue at a ski area
derive from activities and facilities that
support Nordic and alpine skiing to
include revenue derived from activities
and facilities that support other snow
sports. This requirement can then be
used to determine whether
authorization of other seasonal, natural
resource-based recreation activities and
facilities would change the primary
purpose of the ski area to a purpose
other than skiing and other snow sports.
The Department has also revised the
terminology for types of revenue
generated by ski areas on NFS lands to
track the types of revenue that are
included in the land use fee calculation
for ski areas on NFS lands under the
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
National Forest Ski Area Permit Fee Act
of 1996 (16 U.S.C. 497c).
The amendment of the definition for
a ski area in 36 CFR 251.51 merely
makes the definition consistent with the
authority in section 3 of SAROEA to
allow authorization of additional
recreation activities and associated
facilities at ski areas on NFS lands and
makes additional changes in
terminology consistent with the
National Forest Ski Area Permit Fee Act.
These revisions are dictated by statute;
the Department has no discretion in
implementing them. Moreover, the
revisions conform precisely to the
corresponding language in the statutes.
Regulatory Certifications
Environmental Impact
This interim final rule is making
minor, purely technical,
nondiscretionary changes to the
definition of a ski area on NFS lands.
Forest Service regulations at 36 CFR
220.6(d)(2) exclude from documentation
in an environmental assessment or
environmental impact statement rules,
regulations, or policies to establish
service wide administrative procedures,
program processes, or instructions. The
Department has determined that this
interim final rule falls within this
category of actions and that no
extraordinary circumstances exist which
require preparation of an environmental
assessment or environmental impact
statement.
This interim final rule has been
reviewed under USDA procedures and
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 on
regulatory planning and review. It has
been determined that this interim final
rule is not significant. This interim final
rule will not have an annual effect of
$100 million or more on the economy,
nor will it adversely affect productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment,
public health or safety, or State or local
governments. This interim final rule
will not interfere with an action taken
or planned by another agency, nor will
this interim final rule raise new legal or
policy issues. Finally, this interim final
rule will not alter the budgetary impact
of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs or the rights and obligations of
beneficiaries of those programs.
Accordingly, this interim final rule is
not subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under E.O.
12866.
The Department has considered this
interim final rule in light of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 602
et seq.). This interim final rule makes
minor, purely technical,
nondiscretionary changes to the
E:\FR\FM\28JNR1.SGM
28JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 125 (Friday, June 28, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 38840-38842]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-15605]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Chapter III
Final Priority--National Institute on Disability and
Rehabilitation Research--Rehabilitation Research and Training Centers
AGENCY: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services,
Department of Education.
ACTION: Final priority.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[CFDA Number: 84.133B-8]
SUMMARY: The Assistant Secretary for Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services announces a priority for the Disability and
Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program administered by
the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research
(NIDRR). Specifically, we announce a priority for a Rehabilitation
Research and Training Center (RRTC) on Disability in Rural Areas. The
Assistant Secretary may use this priority for competitions in fiscal
year (FY) 2013 and later years. We take this action to focus research
attention on areas of national need. We intend this priority to improve
outcomes among individuals with disabilities in rural areas.
DATES: This priority is effective July 29, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marlene Spencer, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., Room 5133, Potomac Center Plaza
(PCP), Washington, DC 20202-2700. Telephone: (202) 245-7532 or by
email: marlene.spencer@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 1-
800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose of Program: The purpose of the Disability and
Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program is to plan and
conduct research, demonstration projects, training, and related
activities, including international activities, to develop methods,
procedures, and rehabilitation technology that maximize the full
inclusion and integration into society, employment, independent living,
family support, and economic and social self-sufficiency of individuals
with disabilities, especially individuals with the most severe
disabilities, and to improve the effectiveness of services authorized
under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (Rehabilitation Act).
Rehabilitation Research and Training Centers
The purpose of the RRTCs, which are funded through the Disability
and Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program, is to achieve
the goals of the Rehabilitation Act, as amended, through advanced
research, training, technical assistance, and dissemination activities
in general problem areas, as specified by NIDRR. These activities are
designed to benefit rehabilitation service providers, individuals with
disabilities, and the family members or other authorized
representatives of individuals with disabilities. Additional
information on the RRTC program can be found at: www.ed.gov/rschstat/research/pubs/res-program.html#RRTC.
Program Authority: 29 U.S.C. 762(g) and 764(b)(2).
Applicable Program Regulations: 34 CFR part 350.
We published a notice of proposed priority (NPP) in the Federal
Register on May 7, 2013 (78 FR 26560). That notice contained background
information and our reasons for proposing the particular priority.
Except for minor technical revisions, there are no differences
between the proposed priority and the final priority.
Public Comment: In response to our invitation in the NPP, we did
not receive any comments on the proposed priority.
Final Priority
RRTC on Disability in Rural Areas.
The Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative
Services establishes a priority for a Rehabilitation Research and
Training Center (RRTC) on Disability in Rural Areas. This RRTC must
conduct rigorous research, and provide training, technical assistance,
and information to improve the outcomes of individuals with
disabilities who live in rural areas. The RRTC must:
(a) Conduct research that examines experiences and outcomes of
individuals with disabilities who live in rural areas and apply the
research findings to develop interventions that improve those outcomes.
Applicants must focus their research activities on topics that fall
under at least one of the following major life domains identified in
NIDRR's Long-Range Plan for Fiscal Years 2013-2017 (78 FR 20299):
Employment, Community Living and Participation, or Health and Function;
(b) Serve as a national resource center for individuals with
disabilities living in rural areas, their families, service and support
providers, and other stakeholders by conducting knowledge translation
activities that include, but are not limited to:
(1) Providing information and technical assistance to service
providers, individuals with disabilities living in rural areas and
their representatives, and other key stakeholders;
(2) Providing training, including graduate, pre-service, and in-
service training, to rehabilitation service providers and other
disability service
[[Page 38841]]
providers, to facilitate more effective delivery of services to
individuals with disabilities living in rural areas. This training may
be provided through conferences, workshops, public education programs,
in-service training programs, and similar activities;
(3) Disseminating research-based information and materials related
to living with a disability in rural areas; and
(c) Involve individuals with disabilities who live in rural areas
in planning and implementing the RRTC's activities, and in evaluating
the RRTC's work.
Types of Priorities:
When inviting applications for a competition using one or more
priorities, we designate the type of each priority as absolute,
competitive preference, or invitational through a notice in the Federal
Register. The effect of each type of priority follows:
Absolute priority: Under an absolute priority, we consider only
applications that meet the priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(3)).
Competitive preference priority: Under a competitive preference
priority, we give competitive preference to an application by (1)
awarding additional points, depending on the extent to which the
application meets the priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i)); or (2)
selecting an application that meets the priority over an application of
comparable merit that does not meet the priority (34 CFR
75.105(c)(2)(ii)).
Invitational priority: Under an invitational priority, we are
particularly interested in applications that meet the priority.
However, we do not give an application that meets the priority a
preference over other applications (34 CFR 75.105(c)(1)).
This notice does not preclude us from proposing additional
priorities, requirements, definitions, or selection criteria, subject
to meeting applicable rulemaking requirements.
Note: This notice does not solicit applications. In any year in
which we choose to use this priority, we invite applications through
a notice in the Federal Register.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Regulatory Impact Analysis
Under Executive Order 12866, the Secretary must determine whether
this regulatory action is ``significant'' and, therefore, subject to
the requirements of the Executive order and subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Section 3(f) of Executive Order
12866 defines a ``significant regulatory action'' as an action likely
to result in a rule that may--
(1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more,
or adversely affect a sector of the economy, productivity, competition,
jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, local or
tribal governments or communities in a material way (also referred to
as an ``economically significant'' rule);
(2) Create serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an
action taken or planned by another agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary impacts of entitlement grants,
user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles stated in the
Executive order.
This final regulatory action is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by OMB under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866.
We have also reviewed this final regulatory action under Executive
Order 13563, which supplements and explicitly reaffirms the principles,
structures, and definitions governing regulatory review established in
Executive Order 12866. To the extent permitted by law, Executive Order
13563 requires that an agency--
(1) Propose or adopt regulations only upon a reasoned determination
that their benefits justify their costs (recognizing that some benefits
and costs are difficult to quantify);
(2) Tailor its regulations to impose the least burden on society,
consistent with obtaining regulatory objectives and taking into
account--among other things and to the extent practicable--the costs of
cumulative regulations;
(3) In choosing among alternative regulatory approaches, select
those approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health and safety, and other
advantages; distributive impacts; and equity);
(4) To the extent feasible, specify performance objectives, rather
than the behavior or manner of compliance a regulated entity must
adopt; and
(5) Identify and assess available alternatives to direct
regulation, including economic incentives--such as user fees or
marketable permits--to encourage the desired behavior, or provide
information that enables the public to make choices.
Executive Order 13563 also requires an agency ``to use the best
available techniques to quantify anticipated present and future
benefits and costs as accurately as possible.'' The Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs of OMB has emphasized that these
techniques may include ``identifying changing future compliance costs
that might result from technological innovation or anticipated
behavioral changes.''
We are issuing this final priority only on a reasoned determination
that its benefits justify its costs. In choosing among alternative
regulatory approaches, we selected those approaches that maximize net
benefits. Based on the analysis that follows, the Department believes
that this regulatory action is consistent with the principles in
Executive Order 13563.
We also have determined that this regulatory action does not unduly
interfere with State, local, and tribal governments in the exercise of
their governmental functions.
In accordance with both Executive orders, the Department has
assessed the potential costs and benefits, both quantitative and
qualitative, of this regulatory action. The potential costs are those
resulting from statutory requirements and those we have determined as
necessary for administering the Department's programs and activities.
The benefits of the Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects
and Centers Program have been well established over the years, as
projects similar to the one envisioned by the final priority have been
completed successfully. The new RRTC will generate and promote the use
of new knowledge that will improve the options for individuals with
disabilities to perform regular activities of their choice in the
community.
Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this
document in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print,
audiotape, or compact disc) on request to the program contact person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this
document is the document published in the Federal Register. Free
Internet access to the official edition of the Federal Register and the
Code of Federal Regulations is available via the Federal Digital System
at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you can view this document, as well
as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal
Register, in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF). To use PDF
you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at the
site.
You may also access documents of the Department published in the
Federal Register by using the article search feature at:
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced
[[Page 38842]]
search feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents
published by the Department.
Dated: June 25, 2013.
Michael K. Yudin,
Delegated the authority to perform the functions and duties of the
Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services.
[FR Doc. 2013-15605 Filed 6-27-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P