Group Lotus plc; Modification of a Temporary Exemption From an Advanced Air Bag Requirement of FMVSS No. 208, 39062-39063 [2013-15534]
Download as PDF
39062
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 125 / Friday, June 28, 2013 / Notices
Privacy Act
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78).
Dated: June 20, 2013.
By Order of the Maritime Administrator.
Julie P. Agarwal,
Secretary, Maritime Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013–15462 Filed 6–27–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–81–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Maritime Administration
[Docket No. MARAD–2013 0079]
Requested Administrative Waiver of
the Coastwise Trade Laws: Vessel SEA
BREEZE 27; Invitation for Public
Comments
Maritime Administration,
Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
As authorized by 46 U.S.C.
12121, the Secretary of Transportation,
as represented by the Maritime
Administration (MARAD), is authorized
to grant waivers of the U.S.-build
requirement of the coastwise laws under
certain circumstances. A request for
such a waiver has been received by
MARAD. The vessel, and a brief
description of the proposed service, is
listed below.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
July 29, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to
docket number MARAD–2013–0079.
Written comments may be submitted by
hand or by mail to the Docket Clerk,
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590. You may also
send comments electronically via the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
All comments will become part of this
docket and will be available for
inspection and copying at the above
address between 10 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
E.T., Monday through Friday, except
federal holidays. An electronic version
of this document and all documents
entered into this docket is available on
the World Wide Web at https://
www.regulations.gov.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:17 Jun 27, 2013
Jkt 229001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Linda Williams, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Maritime
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Room W23–453,
Washington, DC 20590. Telephone 202–
366–0903, Email
Linda.Williams@dot.gov.
As
described by the applicant the intended
service of the vessel SEA BREEZE 27 is:
Intended Commercial Use of Vessel:
‘‘Charter fishing 6 people or less’’.
Geographic Region: ‘‘Ohio’’.
The complete application is given in
DOT docket MARAD–2013–0079 at
https://www.regulations.gov. Interested
parties may comment on the effect this
action may have on U.S. vessel builders
or businesses in the U.S. that use U.S.flag vessels. If MARAD determines, in
accordance with 46 U.S.C. 12121 and
MARAD’s regulations at 46 CFR part
388, that the issuance of the waiver will
have an unduly adverse effect on a U.S.vessel builder or a business that uses
U.S.-flag vessels in that business, a
waiver will not be granted. Comments
should refer to the docket number of
this notice and the vessel name in order
for MARAD to properly consider the
comments. Comments should also state
the commenter’s interest in the waiver
application, and address the waiver
criteria given in § 388.4 of MARAD’s
regulations at 46 CFR Part 388.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Privacy Act
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78).
By Order of the Maritime Administrator.
Dated: June 20, 2013.
Julie P. Agarwal,
Secretary, Maritime Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013–15457 Filed 6–27–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–81–P
PO 00000
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2012–0086]
Group Lotus plc; Modification of a
Temporary Exemption From an
Advanced Air Bag Requirement of
FMVSS No. 208
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of modification of a
temporary exemption from a provision
of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standard (FMVSS) No. 208, Occupant
Crash Protection.
AGENCY:
This notice modifies the
temporary exemption granted to Group
Lotus plc (Lotus) on March 8, 2013. The
agency granted Lotus an exemption
from the higher maximum speed (56
km/h (35 mph)) belted test requirement
using 5th percentile adult female
dummies for the front passenger
position of its Evora model for the
period from March 8, 2013 to March 8,
2014. The agency is modifying the dates
of the exemption to account for vehicles
Lotus manufactured before the
exemption went into effect.
DATES: NHTSA Temporary Exemption
No. EX–13–01 granted to Lotus is
modified to include vehicles imported
on or after November 7, 2012. The
termination date of the exemption is
modified to be November 7, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Jasinski, Office of the Chief
Counsel, NCC–112, National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., West Building 4th
Floor, Room W41–326, Washington, DC
20590. Telephone: (202) 366–2992; Fax:
(202) 366–3820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March
8, 2013, NHTSA published in the
Federal Register a notice granting
Group Lotus Plc (Lotus) a temporary
exemption from the higher maximum
speed (56 km/h (35 mph)) belted test
requirement using 5th percentile adult
female dummies in Federal Motor
Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No.
208 for the front passenger position of
its Evora model for the period from
March 8, 2013 to March 8, 2014.1 This
requirement became effective for small
manufacturers such as Lotus as of
September 1, 2012.
After publication of Lotus’s
exemption, Lotus informed the agency
of the existence of 51 vehicles that were
SUMMARY:
1 78
Frm 00151
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\28JNN1.SGM
FR 15114.
28JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 125 / Friday, June 28, 2013 / Notices
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
manufactured on or after September 1,
2012 and before March 8, 2013 that
were imported into the United States.
Lotus asserted that these vehicles were
partially manufactured prior to
September 1, 2012, but were not
completed until after that date. These 51
vehicles bear certification labels stating
a date of manufacture of August 2012
and are certified to comply with the
standards, including FMVSS No. 208,
applicable as of August 2012.
For the purpose of FMVSS No. 208
compliance, these vehicles are identical
to those manufactured prior to
September 1, 2012 and after March 8,
2013. However, the vehicles are not
certified to be compliant with the
standards in effect as of the date they
were actually manufactured, which
include the higher speed belted test
requirement using the 5th percentile
adult female dummy. Moreover, the
exemption that NHTSA granted to Lotus
would not apply to these vehicles
because they were manufactured before
March 8, 2013.
Lotus has agreed to pay a civil penalty
for alleged violations of 49 USC
30112(a).2 Additionally, the
Administrator has the authority to
terminate or modify a temporary
exemption granted under 49 CFR Part
555 upon a finding that (1) the
temporary exemption is no longer
consistent with the public interests and
the objectives of the National Traffic
and Motor Vehicle Safety Act; or (2) the
temporary exemption was granted on
the basis of false, fraudulent, or
misleading representations or
information. At the time the agency
granted Lotus its exemption, the agency
believed that Lotus ceased production of
the Evora for the United States market
as of September 1, 2012 and was not
aware that Lotus continued to
manufacture the Evora after September
1, 2012. On the basis of this incorrect
information, NHTSA granted Lotus a
one-year exemption commencing on
March 8, 2013.
Having found that Lotus’s exemption
was based on incorrect information, the
agency has the authority to modify or
terminate Lotus’s temporary
exemption.3 Because the 51 vehicles are
identical to those manufactured prior to
September 1, 2012 and those that may
2 Among other things, 49 USC 30112(a) prohibits
a person from selling, offering for sale, introducing
or delivering into interstate commerce, or importing
into the United States any motor vehicle that does
not comply with the FMVSSs then in effect.
3 Lotus has acknowledged that it has been duly
notified by NHTSA of any facts that warrant
modifying or terminating its exemption and that it
has had an opportunity to demonstrate or achieve
compliance with all lawful requirements.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:17 Jun 27, 2013
Jkt 229001
be manufactured under Lotus’s
temporary exemption, the agency has
decided it is appropriate to modify
Lotus’s exemption to apply it
retroactively to vehicles manufactured
after September 1, 2012 and imported
on or after November 7, 2012. This will
allow the exemption to apply to 50 of
the 51 vehicles manufactured after
September 1, 2012.4 Lotus will export
one vehicle from the United States,
which will not be included in the
exemption.
The 50 vehicles will count toward the
450 vehicle limit under the exemption.
Because these 50 vehicles are now
covered by an exemption, Lotus must
ensure that they are labeled with the
correct date of manufacture and
statements required by 49 CFR 555.9 for
exempted vehicles.
The agency’s determination that a
one-year exemption is appropriate
under the circumstances has not
changed. Thus, in addition to applying
the exemption retroactively to 50
vehicles, the agency has also modified
the termination date of the exemption so
that the exemption granted is not longer
than one year. The exemption will now
apply to vehicles manufactured through
November 7, 2013.
Based on the foregoing and pursuant
to 49 CFR 555.8(d), the Administrator
finds that NHTSA Temporary
Exemption No. EX 13–01, granted to
Lotus from S14.7 of 49 CFR 571.208 for
the front passenger seat of its Evora
model was based on incorrect
information. Accordingly, the
exemption is modified to include
vehicles imported on or after November
7, 2012. The exemption is also modified
to terminate on November 7, 2013.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30113; 49 CFR 1.95,
555.8.
Issued in Washington, DC, on June 21,
2013 under authority delegated in 49 CFR
1.95, 501.5, and 501.7.
David L. Strickland,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2013–15534 Filed 6–27–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
4 It is not unprecedented that for NHTSA to apply
a temporary exemption to vehicles that have
already been manufactured at the time of the grant
of an exemption. In a March 1995 grant of an
application for a temporary exemption from the air
bag requirements FMVSS No. 208 to Excalibur
Automobile Corporation, the agency applied a
temporary exemption to 36 vehicles that were, at
the time of the request for exemption, in control of
the company’s dealers. See 60 FR 12281 (Mar. 6,
1995).
PO 00000
Frm 00152
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
39063
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Fiscal Service
Prompt Payment Interest Rate;
Contract Disputes Act
Bureau of the Fiscal Service,
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
For the period beginning July
1, 2013, and ending on December 31,
2013, the prompt payment interest rate
is 13⁄4 per centum per annum.
ADDRESSES: Comments or inquiries may
be mailed to Sam Doak, Reporting Team
Leader, Federal Borrowings Branch,
Division of Accounting Operations,
Office of Public Debt Accounting,
Bureau of the Fiscal Service,
Parkersburg, West Virginia, 26106–1328.
A copy of this Notice is available at
https://www.treasurydirect.gov.
DATES: Effective July 1, 2013, to
December 31, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Adam Charlton, Manager, Federal
Borrowings Branch, Office of Public
Debt Accounting, Bureau of the Fiscal
Service, Parkersburg, West Virginia
26106–1328, (304) 480–5248; Sam Doak,
Reporting Team Leader, Federal
Borrowings Branch, Division of
Accounting Operations, Office of Public
Debt Accounting, Bureau of the Fiscal
Service, Parkersburg, West Virginia
26106–1328, (304) 480–5117; or Elisha
S. Garvey, Attorney-Advisor, Office of
the Chief Counsel, Bureau of the Fiscal
Service, (202) 504–3715.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: An agency
that has acquired property or service
from a business concern and has failed
to pay for the complete delivery of
property or service by the required
payment date shall pay the business
concern an interest penalty. 31 U.S.C.
3902(a). The Contract Disputes Act of
1978, Sec. 12, Public Law 95–563, 92
Stat. 2389, and the Prompt Payment Act,
31 U.S.C. 3902(a), provide for the
calculation of interest due on claims at
the rate established by the Secretary of
the Treasury.
The Secretary of the Treasury has the
authority to specify the rate by which
the interest shall be computed for
interest payments under section 12 of
the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 and
under the Prompt Payment Act. Under
the Prompt Payment Act, if an interest
penalty is owed to a business concern,
the penalty shall be paid regardless of
whether the business concern requested
payment of such penalty. 31 U.S.C.
3902(c)(1). Agencies must pay the
interest penalty calculated with the
interest rate, which is in effect at the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\28JNN1.SGM
28JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 125 (Friday, June 28, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39062-39063]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-15534]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-2012-0086]
Group Lotus plc; Modification of a Temporary Exemption From an
Advanced Air Bag Requirement of FMVSS No. 208
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of modification of a temporary exemption from a
provision of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 208,
Occupant Crash Protection.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice modifies the temporary exemption granted to Group
Lotus plc (Lotus) on March 8, 2013. The agency granted Lotus an
exemption from the higher maximum speed (56 km/h (35 mph)) belted test
requirement using 5th percentile adult female dummies for the front
passenger position of its Evora model for the period from March 8, 2013
to March 8, 2014. The agency is modifying the dates of the exemption to
account for vehicles Lotus manufactured before the exemption went into
effect.
DATES: NHTSA Temporary Exemption No. EX-13-01 granted to Lotus is
modified to include vehicles imported on or after November 7, 2012. The
termination date of the exemption is modified to be November 7, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Jasinski, Office of the Chief
Counsel, NCC-112, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building 4th Floor, Room W41-326,
Washington, DC 20590. Telephone: (202) 366-2992; Fax: (202) 366-3820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March 8, 2013, NHTSA published in the
Federal Register a notice granting Group Lotus Plc (Lotus) a temporary
exemption from the higher maximum speed (56 km/h (35 mph)) belted test
requirement using 5th percentile adult female dummies in Federal Motor
Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 208 for the front passenger
position of its Evora model for the period from March 8, 2013 to March
8, 2014.\1\ This requirement became effective for small manufacturers
such as Lotus as of September 1, 2012.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 78 FR 15114.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
After publication of Lotus's exemption, Lotus informed the agency
of the existence of 51 vehicles that were
[[Page 39063]]
manufactured on or after September 1, 2012 and before March 8, 2013
that were imported into the United States. Lotus asserted that these
vehicles were partially manufactured prior to September 1, 2012, but
were not completed until after that date. These 51 vehicles bear
certification labels stating a date of manufacture of August 2012 and
are certified to comply with the standards, including FMVSS No. 208,
applicable as of August 2012.
For the purpose of FMVSS No. 208 compliance, these vehicles are
identical to those manufactured prior to September 1, 2012 and after
March 8, 2013. However, the vehicles are not certified to be compliant
with the standards in effect as of the date they were actually
manufactured, which include the higher speed belted test requirement
using the 5th percentile adult female dummy. Moreover, the exemption
that NHTSA granted to Lotus would not apply to these vehicles because
they were manufactured before March 8, 2013.
Lotus has agreed to pay a civil penalty for alleged violations of
49 USC 30112(a).\2\ Additionally, the Administrator has the authority
to terminate or modify a temporary exemption granted under 49 CFR Part
555 upon a finding that (1) the temporary exemption is no longer
consistent with the public interests and the objectives of the National
Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act; or (2) the temporary exemption
was granted on the basis of false, fraudulent, or misleading
representations or information. At the time the agency granted Lotus
its exemption, the agency believed that Lotus ceased production of the
Evora for the United States market as of September 1, 2012 and was not
aware that Lotus continued to manufacture the Evora after September 1,
2012. On the basis of this incorrect information, NHTSA granted Lotus a
one-year exemption commencing on March 8, 2013.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Among other things, 49 USC 30112(a) prohibits a person from
selling, offering for sale, introducing or delivering into
interstate commerce, or importing into the United States any motor
vehicle that does not comply with the FMVSSs then in effect.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Having found that Lotus's exemption was based on incorrect
information, the agency has the authority to modify or terminate
Lotus's temporary exemption.\3\ Because the 51 vehicles are identical
to those manufactured prior to September 1, 2012 and those that may be
manufactured under Lotus's temporary exemption, the agency has decided
it is appropriate to modify Lotus's exemption to apply it retroactively
to vehicles manufactured after September 1, 2012 and imported on or
after November 7, 2012. This will allow the exemption to apply to 50 of
the 51 vehicles manufactured after September 1, 2012.\4\ Lotus will
export one vehicle from the United States, which will not be included
in the exemption.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Lotus has acknowledged that it has been duly notified by
NHTSA of any facts that warrant modifying or terminating its
exemption and that it has had an opportunity to demonstrate or
achieve compliance with all lawful requirements.
\4\ It is not unprecedented that for NHTSA to apply a temporary
exemption to vehicles that have already been manufactured at the
time of the grant of an exemption. In a March 1995 grant of an
application for a temporary exemption from the air bag requirements
FMVSS No. 208 to Excalibur Automobile Corporation, the agency
applied a temporary exemption to 36 vehicles that were, at the time
of the request for exemption, in control of the company's dealers.
See 60 FR 12281 (Mar. 6, 1995).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The 50 vehicles will count toward the 450 vehicle limit under the
exemption. Because these 50 vehicles are now covered by an exemption,
Lotus must ensure that they are labeled with the correct date of
manufacture and statements required by 49 CFR 555.9 for exempted
vehicles.
The agency's determination that a one-year exemption is appropriate
under the circumstances has not changed. Thus, in addition to applying
the exemption retroactively to 50 vehicles, the agency has also
modified the termination date of the exemption so that the exemption
granted is not longer than one year. The exemption will now apply to
vehicles manufactured through November 7, 2013.
Based on the foregoing and pursuant to 49 CFR 555.8(d), the
Administrator finds that NHTSA Temporary Exemption No. EX 13-01,
granted to Lotus from S14.7 of 49 CFR 571.208 for the front passenger
seat of its Evora model was based on incorrect information.
Accordingly, the exemption is modified to include vehicles imported on
or after November 7, 2012. The exemption is also modified to terminate
on November 7, 2013.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30113; 49 CFR 1.95, 555.8.
Issued in Washington, DC, on June 21, 2013 under authority
delegated in 49 CFR 1.95, 501.5, and 501.7.
David L. Strickland,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2013-15534 Filed 6-27-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P