ING Investments, LLC, et al.;, 39023-39027 [2013-15506]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 125 / Friday, June 28, 2013 / Notices
at the address provided for the System
Manager, above. When seeking records
about yourself from this system of
records your request must comply with
the Board’s Privacy Act regulations and
must include sufficient information to
permit us to identify potentially
responsive records. In addition, you
must sign your request, and your
signature must either be notarized or
submitted under 28 U.S.C. § 1746, a law
that permits statements to be made
under penalty of perjury as a substitute
for notarization. If your request is
seeking records pertaining to another
living individual, you must include a
statement from that individual
certifying his/her consent to your access
to his/her records. Without this
information, we may not be able to
conduct an effective search, and your
request may be denied due to lack of
specificity or lack of compliance with
applicable regulations.
RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES:
See ‘‘Notification procedure’’ above.
CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES:
See ‘‘Notification procedure’’ above.
RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES:
Records are obtained from individuals
who submit FOIA and PA requests or
appeals; the records searched and
identified as responsive in the process
of responding to such requests and
appeals; Board personnel assigned to
handle such requests and appeals; other
agencies that have referred FOIA or PA
requests to the Board for consultation or
response; submitters or subjects of
records or information that have
provided assistance to the Board in
making access or amendment
determinations.
EXEMPTIONS CLAIMED FOR THE SYSTEM:
None.
Dated: June 24, 2013.
Diane Janosek,
Chief Legal Counsel, Privacy and Civil
Liberties Oversight Board.
[FR Doc. 2013–15536 Filed 6–27–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–B3–P
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor
Education and Advocacy,
Washington, DC 20549–0213.
Extension:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:17 Jun 27, 2013
Jkt 229001
Rule 10b–10; SEC File No. 270–389, OMB
Control No. 3235–0444.
Notice is hereby given that, pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) (‘‘PRA’’), the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) has submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget
(‘‘OMB’’) a request for approval of
extension of the previously approved
collection of information provided for in
Rule 10b–10 (17 CFR 240.10b–10) under
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.).
Rule 10b–10 requires broker-dealers
to convey basic trade information to
customers regarding their securities
transactions. This information includes:
the date and time of the transaction, the
identity and number of shares bought or
sold, and the trading capacity of the
broker-dealer. Depending on the trading
capacity of the broker-dealer, Rule 10b–
10 requires the disclosure of
commissions as well as mark-up and
mark-down information. For
transactions in debt securities, Rule
10b–10 requires the disclosure of
redemption and yield information. Rule
10b–10 potentially applies to all of the
approximately 5,178 firms registered
with the Commission that effect
transactions on behalf of customers.
Based on information provided by
registered broker-dealers to the
Commission in FOCUS Reports, the
Commission staff estimates that on
average, registered broker-dealers
process approximately 1.4 billion order
tickets per month for transactions on
behalf of customers. Each order ticket
representing a transaction effected on
behalf of a customer results in one
confirmation. Therefore, the
Commission staff estimates that
approximately 16.8 billion
confirmations are sent to customers
annually. The confirmations required by
Rule 10b–10 are generally processed
through automated systems. It takes
approximately 30 seconds to generate
and send a confirmation. Accordingly,
the Commission estimates that brokerdealers spend 140 million hours per
year complying with Rule 10b–10.
The amount of confirmations sent and
the cost of sending each confirmation
varies from firm to firm. Smaller firms
generally send fewer confirmations than
larger firms because they effect fewer
transactions. The Commission staff
estimates the costs of producing and
sending a paper confirmation, including
postage to be approximately 54 cents.
The Commission staff also estimates
that the cost of producing and sending
a wholly electronic confirmation is
approximately 39 cents. Based on
PO 00000
Frm 00112
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
39023
informal discussions with industry
participants as well as no-action
positions taken in this area, the staff
estimates that broker-dealers used
electronic confirmations for
approximately 35 percent of
transactions. Based on these
calculations, Commission staff estimates
that 10,920,000,000 paper confirmations
are mailed each year at a cost of
$5,896,800,000. Commission staff also
estimates that 5,880,000,000 wholly
electronic confirmations are sent each
year at a cost of $2,293,200,000.
Accordingly, Commission staff
estimates that total annual cost
associated with generating and
delivering to investors the information
required under Rule 10b–10 would be
$8,190,000,000.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
subject to the PRA unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
The public may view background
documentation for this information
collection at the following Web site:
www.reginfo.gov. Comments should be
directed to: (i) Desk Officer for the
Securities and Exchange Commission,
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, Room 10102, New Executive
Office Building, Washington, DC 20503,
or by sending an email to:
Shagufta_Ahmed@omb.eop.gov; and (ii)
Thomas Bayer, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and
Exchange Commission, c/o Remi PavlikSimon, 100 F Street NE., Washington,
DC 20549; or send an email to:
PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov. Comments must
be submitted to OMB within 30 days of
this notice.
Dated: June 24, 2013.
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–15491 Filed 6–27–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Investment Company Act Release No.
30566; File No. 812–14111]
ING Investments, LLC, et al.; Notice of
Application
June 24, 2013.
Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’).
ACTION: Notice of an application under
section 6(c) of the Investment Company
Act of 1940 (‘‘Act’’) for an exemption
from section 15(a) of the Act and rule
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\28JNN1.SGM
28JNN1
39024
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 125 / Friday, June 28, 2013 / Notices
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
18f–2 under the Act, as well as from
certain disclosure requirements.
Summary of Application: Applicants
request an order that would amend and
supersede a prior order (the ‘‘NonAffiliated Sub-Adviser Order’’) 1 that
permits them to enter into and
materially amend subadvisory
agreements for certain multi-managed
funds with non-affiliated sub-advisers
without shareholder approval and
grants relief from certain disclosure
requirements. The requested order
would permit applicants to enter into,
and amend, such agreements with
Wholly-Owned Sub-Advisers (as
defined below) and non-affiliated subadvisers without shareholder approval.
Applicants: ING Balanced Portfolio,
Inc., ING Equity Trust, ING Funds Trust,
ING Intermediate Bond Portfolio, ING
Investors Trust, ING Mayflower Trust,
ING Money Market Portfolio, ING
Mutual Funds, ING Partners, Inc., ING
Separate Portfolios Trust, ING Series
Fund, Inc., ING Strategic Allocation
Portfolios, Inc., ING Variable Funds,
ING Variable Insurance Trust, ING
Variable Portfolios Inc., and ING
Variable Products Trust (each an ‘‘ING
Investment Company’’ and collectively,
the ‘‘ING Investment Companies’’), and
Directed Services LLC (‘‘DSL’’), ING
Investments, LLC (‘‘IIL’’), and ING
Investment Management Co. LLC
(‘‘IIM’’).
Filing Dates: The application was
filed on January 11, 2013, and amended
on April 15, 2013, and June 21, 2013.
Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An
order granting the application will be
issued unless the Commission orders a
hearing. Interested persons may request
a hearing by writing to the
Commission’s Secretary and serving
applicants with a copy of the request,
personally or by mail. Hearing requests
should be received by the Commission
by 5:30 p.m. on July 19, 2013, and
should be accompanied by proof of
service on applicants, in the form of an
affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate of
service. Hearing requests should state
the nature of the writer’s interest, the
reason for the request, and the issues
contested. Persons who wish to be
notified of a hearing may request
notification by writing to the
Commission’s Secretary.
ADDRESSES: Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
Applicants, c/o Huey P. Falgout, Jr.,
1 Portfolio Partners, Inc., et al., Investment
Company Act Release Nos. 25558 (Apr. 30, 2002)
(notice) and 25592 (May 24, 2002) (order).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:17 Jun 27, 2013
Jkt 229001
Chief Counsel, ING Funds, 7337 East
Doubletree Ranch Road, Suite 100,
Scottsdale, AZ 85255.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laura L. Solomon, Senior Attorney, at
(202) 551–6915, or Daniele Marchesani,
Branch Chief, at (202) 551–6821
(Division of Investment Management,
Exemptive Applications Office).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
following is a summary of the
application. The complete application
may be obtained via the Commission’s
Web site by searching for the file
number or an applicant using the
Company name box, at https://
www.sec.gov/search/search.htm or by
calling (202) 551–8090.
Applicants’ Representations
1. Each ING Investment Company is
organized as a Massachusetts business
trust, a Delaware statutory trust, or a
Maryland corporation and is registered
with the Commission as an open-end
management investment company
under the Act. Each ING Investment
Company may offer one or more series
of shares (each a ‘‘Series’’ and
collectively, ‘‘Series’’) with its own
distinct investment objectives, policies
and restrictions.2 Each Series has, or
will have, as its investment adviser,
Directed Services LLC (‘‘DSL’’), ING
Investments, LLC (‘‘IIL’’) or ING
Investment Management Co. LLC
(‘‘IIM’’), or another investment adviser
controlling, controlled by or under
common control with IIL, DSL, or IIM
or their successors (each, an ‘‘Adviser’’
and, collectively with the Series and the
ING Investment Companies, the
‘‘Applicants’’).3 The Advisers are each
an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of
ING U.S. Inc., which in turn, is a wholly
owned subsidiary of ING Groep N.V.
(‘‘ING Groep’’). ING Groep is a global
financial institution of Dutch origin
offering banking, investments, life
insurance and retirement services.4
2 The term ‘‘Series’’ also includes the ING
Investment Companies listed above that do not offer
multiple series.
3 Each Adviser is or will be registered with the
Commission as an investment adviser under the
Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended
(‘‘Advisers Act’’). For purposes of the requested
order, ‘‘successor’’ is limited to an entity that
results from a reorganization into another
jurisdiction or a change in the type of business
organization.
4 Applicants request that the relief apply to the
Applicants, as well as to any future Series and any
other existing or future registered open-end
management investment company or series thereof
that is advised by an Adviser, uses the multimanager structure described in the application, and
complies with the terms and conditions of the
application (‘‘Sub-Advised Series’’). All registered
open-end investment companies that currently
intend to rely on the requested order are named as
PO 00000
Frm 00113
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2. An Adviser serves as the
investment adviser to each Series that it
manages pursuant to an investment
advisory agreement with the applicable
ING Investment Company (‘‘Investment
Management Agreement’’). The
Investment Management Agreement for
each existing Series was approved by
the board of trustees/directors of the
applicable ING Investment Company
(the ‘‘Board’’), including a majority of
the members of the Board who are not
‘‘interested persons’’, as defined in
section 2(a)(19) of the Act, of the Series
or the Adviser (‘‘Independent Board
Members’’) and by the shareholders of
that Series as required by sections 15(a)
and 15(c) of the Act and rule 18f–2
thereunder. The terms of these
Investment Management Agreements
comply with section 15(a) of the Act.
Each Investment Management
Agreement will comply with section
15(a) of the Act and will be similarly
approved.
3. Under the terms of each Investment
Management Agreement, the relevant
Adviser, subject to the supervision of
the Board, provides continuous
investment management of the assets of
the relevant Series. The Adviser
periodically reviews a Series’
investment policies and strategies and
based on the need of a particular Series
may recommend changes to the
investment policies and strategies of the
Series for consideration by the Board.
For its services to each Series under the
applicable Investment Management
Agreement, the Adviser receives an
investment management fee from that
Series based on the average net assets of
that Series. Certain Series of IIT operate
under a ‘‘unified’’ fee arrangement as
further described in the application. The
terms of each Investment Management
Agreement permit the Adviser, subject
to the approval of the Board, including
a majority of the Independent Board
Members, and the shareholders of the
applicable Sub-Advised Series (if
required), to delegate portfolio
management responsibilities of all or a
portion of the assets of a Sub-Advised
Series to one or more Sub-Advisers.5
Applicants. All Series that currently are, or that
currently intend to be, Sub-Advised Series are
identified in the application. Any entity that relies
on the requested order will do so only in
accordance with the terms and conditions
contained the application. The requested relief will
not extend to any sub-adviser, other than a WhollyOwned Sub-Adviser (as defined below), who is an
affiliated person, as defined in section 2(a)(3) of the
Act, of the Sub-Advised Series, or of the Adviser,
other than by reason of serving as a sub-adviser to
one or more of the Sub-Advised Series (‘‘Affiliated
Sub-Adviser’’).
5 As used herein, a ‘‘Sub-Adviser’’ is (1) an
indirect or direct ‘‘wholly-owned subsidiary’’ (as
E:\FR\FM\28JNN1.SGM
28JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 125 / Friday, June 28, 2013 / Notices
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
4. Applicants request an order to
permit an Adviser, subject to the
approval of the Board, including a
majority of the Independent Board
Members, to, without obtaining
shareholder approval: (i) Select SubAdvisers to manage all or a portion of
the assets of a Series and enter into SubAdvisory Agreements (as defined below)
with the Sub-Advisers, and (ii)
materially amend Sub-Advisory
Agreements with the Sub-Advisers.6
5. Pursuant to each Investment
Management Agreement, the Adviser
has overall responsibility for the
management and investment of the
assets of each Sub-Advised Series; these
responsibilities include recommending
the removal or replacement of SubAdvisers, determining the portion of
that Sub-Advised Series’ assets to be
managed by any given Sub-Adviser and
reallocating those assets as necessary
from time to time. In accordance with
each Investment Management
Agreement, the Adviser will supervise
each Sub-Adviser in its performance of
its duties with a view to preventing
violations of the federal securities laws.
6. The Advisers have entered into
sub-advisory agreements with SubAdvisers (‘‘Sub-Advisory Agreements’’)
to provide investment management
services to the Subadvised Series.7 The
terms of each Sub-Advisory Agreement
comply fully with the requirements of
section 15(a) of the Act and were
approved by the applicable Board,
including a majority of the Independent
Board Members, and, to the extent that
the Non-Affiliated Sub-Adviser Order
did not apply (or was not relied upon),
the shareholders of the Sub-Advised
Series in accordance with sections 15(a)
and 15(c) of the Act and rule 18f–2
thereunder. The Sub-Advisers, subject
to the supervision of the Advisers and
oversight of the Board, determine the
securities and other instruments to be
purchased or sold or entered into by a
Sub-Advised Series and place orders
with brokers or dealers that they select.
Each Adviser will compensate each
Sub-Adviser out of the fee paid to the
Adviser under the relevant Investment
Management Agreement.
7. Sub-Advised Series will inform
shareholders of the hiring of a new SubAdviser pursuant to the following
procedures (‘‘Modified Notice and
Access Procedures’’): (a) Within 90 days
after a new Sub-Adviser is hired for any
Sub-Advised Series, that Sub-Advised
Series will send its shareholders 8 either
a Multi-Manager Notice or a MultiManager Notice and Multi-Manager
Information Statement; 9 and (b) the
Sub-Advised Series will make the
Multi-Manager Information Statement
available on the Web site identified in
the Multi-Manager Notice no later than
when the Multi-Manager Notice (or
Multi-Manager Notice and MultiManager Information Statement) is first
sent to shareholders, and will maintain
it on that Web site for at least 90 days.
In the circumstances described in the
application, a proxy solicitation to
approve the appointment of new SubAdvisers provides no more meaningful
information to shareholders than the
proposed Multi-Manager Information
Statement. Applicants state that each
Board would comply with the
requirements of sections 15(a) and 15(c)
such term is defined in the Act) of the Adviser for
that Series, or (2) a sister company of the Adviser
for that Series that is an indirect or direct ‘‘whollyowned subsidiary’’ (as such term is defined in the
Act) of the same company that, indirectly or
directly, wholly owns the Adviser (each of (1) and
(2) a ‘‘Wholly-Owned Sub-Adviser’’ and
collectively, the ‘‘Wholly-Owned Sub-Advisers’’),
or (3) not an ‘‘affiliated person’’ (as such term is
defined in section 2(a)(3) of the Act) of the Series,
the applicable ING Investment Company, or an
Adviser, except to the extent that an affiliation
arises solely because the Sub-Adviser serves as a
Sub-Adviser to a Series (each a ‘‘Non-Affiliated
Sub-Adviser’’).
6 Shareholder approval will continue to be
required for any other sub-adviser change (not
otherwise permitted by rule or other action of the
Commission or staff) and material amendments to
an existing sub-advisory agreement with any subadviser other than a Non-Affiliated Sub-Adviser or
a Wholly-Owned Sub-Adviser (all such changes
referred to as ‘‘Ineligible Affiliated Sub-Adviser
Changes’’).
7 If the name of any Sub-Advised Series contains
the name of a Sub-Adviser, the name of the Adviser
that serves as the primary adviser to the SubAdvised Series, or a trademark or trade name that
is owned by or publicly used to identity that
Adviser, will precede the name of the Sub-Adviser.
8 The term ‘‘shareholders’’ as used in the
application includes variable contract holders,
insurance companies, plan participants, or plan
trustees entitled to give voting instructions with
respect to a fund.
9 A ‘‘Multi-Manager Notice’’ will be modeled on
a Notice of Internet Availability as defined in rule
14a–16 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Exchange Act’’), and specifically will, among
other things: (a) Summarize the relevant
information regarding the new Sub-Adviser; (b)
inform shareholders that the Multi-Manager
Information Statement is available on a Web site;
(c) provide the Web site address; (d) state the time
period during which the Multi-Manager
Information Statement will remain available on that
Web site; (e) provide instructions for accessing and
printing the Multi-Manager Information Statement;
and (f) instruct the shareholder that a paper or
email copy of the Multi-Manager Information
Statement may be obtained, without charge, by
contacting the Sub-Advised Series.
A ‘‘Multi-Manager Information Statement’’ will
meet the requirements of Regulation 14C, Schedule
14C and Item 22 of Schedule 14A under the
Exchange Act for an information statement, except
as modified by the order to permit Aggregate Fee
Disclosure, as defined below. Multi-Manager
Information Statements will be filed with the
Commission via the EDGAR system.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:17 Jun 27, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00114
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
39025
of the Act before entering into or
amending Sub-Advisory Agreements.
8. Applicants also request an order
exempting the Sub-Advised Series from
certain disclosure obligations that may
require the Applicants to disclose fees
paid by the Adviser to each SubAdviser. Applicants seek relief to permit
each Sub-Advised Series to disclose (as
a dollar amount and a percentage of the
Sub-Advised Series’ net assets): (a) The
aggregate fees paid to the Adviser and
any Wholly-Owned Sub-Adviser; (b) the
aggregate fees paid to Non-Affiliated
Sub-Advisers; and (c) the fee paid to
each Affiliated Sub-Adviser
(collectively, the ‘‘Aggregate Fee
Disclosure’’).
Applicants’ Legal Analysis
1. Section 15(a) of the Act states, in
part, that it is unlawful for any person
to act as an investment adviser to a
registered investment company ‘‘except
pursuant to a written contract, which
contract, whether with such registered
company or with an investment adviser
of such registered company, has been
approved by the vote of a majority of the
outstanding voting securities of such
registered company.’’ Rule 18f–2 under
the Act states that any ‘‘matter required
to be submitted . . . to the holders of
the outstanding voting securities of a
series company shall not be deemed to
have been effectively acted upon unless
approved by the holders of a majority of
the outstanding voting securities of each
class or series of stock affected by such
matter.’’ Further, rule 18(f)–2(c)(1)
under the Act provides that a vote to
approve an investment advisory
contract required by section 15(a) of the
Act ‘‘shall be deemed to be effectively
acted upon with respect to any class or
series of securities of such [registered
investment] company if a majority of the
outstanding voting securities of such
class or series vote for the approval of
such matter.’’
2. Form N–1A is the registration
statement used by open-end investment
companies. Item 19(a)(3) of Form N–1A
requires a registered investment
company to disclose in its statement of
additional information the method of
computing the ‘‘advisory fee payable’’
by the investment company, including
the total dollar amounts that the
investment company ‘‘paid to the
adviser (aggregated with amounts paid
to affiliated advisers, if any), and any
advisers who are not affiliated persons
of the adviser, under the investment
advisory contract for the last three fiscal
years.’’
3. Rule 20a–1 under the Act requires
proxies solicited with respect to a
registered investment company to
E:\FR\FM\28JNN1.SGM
28JNN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
39026
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 125 / Friday, June 28, 2013 / Notices
comply with Schedule 14A under the
Exchange Act. Items 22(c)(1)(ii),
22(c)(1)(iii), 22(c)(8) and 22(c)(9) of
Schedule 14A, taken together, require a
proxy statement for a shareholder
meeting at which the advisory contract
will be voted upon to include the ‘‘rate
of compensation of the investment
adviser,’’ the ‘‘aggregate amount of the
investment adviser’s fee,’’ a description
of the ‘‘terms of the contract to be acted
upon,’’ and, if a change in the advisory
fee is proposed, the existing and
proposed fees and the difference
between the two fees.
4. Regulation S–X sets forth the
requirements for financial statements
required to be included as part of a
registered investment company’s
registration statement and shareholder
reports filed with the Commission.
Sections 6–07(2)(a), (b), and (c) of
Regulation S–X require a registered
investment company to include in its
financial statement information about
the investment advisory fees.
5. Section 6(c) of the Act provides that
the Commission by order upon
application may conditionally or
unconditionally exempt any person,
security, or transaction or any class or
classes of persons, securities, or
transactions from any provisions of the
Act, or from any rule thereunder, if such
exemption is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest and consistent
with the protection of investors and the
purposes fairly intended by the policy
and provisions of the Act. Applicants
state that their requested relief meets
this standard for the reasons discussed
below.
6. Applicants assert that the
shareholders expect the Advisers,
subject to review and approval of the
Board, to select Sub-Advisers who the
Advisers believe can achieve the SubAdvised Series’ investment objectives.
Applicants assert that, from the
perspective of the shareholder, the role
of the Sub-Advisers is substantially
equivalent to the role of the individual
portfolio managers employed by an
investment adviser to a traditional
investment company. Applicants
believe that permitting the Adviser to
perform the duties for which the
shareholders of the Sub-Advised Series
are paying the Adviser—the selection,
supervision and evaluation of the SubAdvisers, including Wholly-Owned
Sub-Advisers—without incurring
unnecessary delays or expenses is
appropriate in the interest of the SubAdvised Series’ shareholders and will
allow such Sub-Advised Series to
operate more efficiently. Applicants
state that each Investment Management
Agreement will continue to be fully
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:17 Jun 27, 2013
Jkt 229001
subject to section 15(a) of the Act and
rule 18f–2 under the Act and approved
by the Board, including a majority of the
Independent Board Members, in the
manner required by sections 15(a) and
15(c) of the Act. Applicants are not
seeking an exemption with respect to
the Investment Management
Agreements.
7. Applicants assert that disclosure of
the individual fees that the Adviser
would pay to the Sub-Advisers that
operate under the multi-manager
structure described in the application
would not serve any meaningful
purpose. Applicants contend that the
primary reasons for requiring disclosure
of individual fees paid to Sub-Advisers
are to inform shareholders of expenses
to be charged by a particular SubAdvised Series and to enable
shareholders to compare the fees to
those of other comparable investment
companies. Applicants believe that the
requested relief satisfies these objectives
because the advisory fee paid to the
Adviser will be fully disclosed and,
therefore, shareholders will know what
the Sub-Advised Series’ fees and
expenses are and will be able to
compare the advisory fees a SubAdvised Series is charged to those of
other investment companies. Applicants
assert that the requested disclosure
relief would benefit shareholders of the
Sub-Advised Series because it would
improve the Adviser’s ability to
negotiate the fees paid to Sub-Advisers.
Applicants state that the Adviser may be
able to negotiate rates that are below a
Sub-Adviser’s ‘‘posted’’ amounts if the
Adviser is not required to disclose the
Sub-Advisers’ fees to the public.
Applicants submit that the relief
requested to use Aggregate Fee
Disclosure will encourage Sub-Advisers
to negotiate lower subadvisory fees with
the Adviser if the lower fees are not
required to be made public.
8. For the reasons discussed above,
Applicants submit that the requested
relief meets the standards for relief
under section 6(c) of the Act. Applicants
state that the operation of the SubAdvised Series in the manner described
in the application must be approved by
shareholders of a Sub-Advised Series
before that Sub-Advised Series may rely
on the requested relief. In addition,
Applicants state that the proposed
conditions to the requested relief are
designed to address any potential
conflicts of interest, including any
posed by the use of Wholly-Owned SubAdvisers, and provide that shareholders
are informed when new Sub-Advisers
are hired. Applicants assert that
conditions 6, 7, 10 and 11 are designed
to provide the Board with sufficient
PO 00000
Frm 00115
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
independence and the resources and
information it needs to monitor and
address any conflicts of interest with
affiliated person of the Adviser,
including Wholly-Owned Sub-Advisers.
Applicants state that, accordingly, they
believe the requested relief is necessary
or appropriate in the public interest and
consistent with the protection of
investors and the purposes fairly
intended by the policy and provisions of
the Act.
Applicants’ Conditions
Applicants agree that any order
granting the requested relief will be
subject to the following conditions: 10
1. Before a Sub-Advised Series may
rely on the order requested in the
application, the operation of the SubAdvised Series in the manner described
in the application, including the hiring
of Wholly-Owned Sub-Advisers, will be,
or has been, approved by a majority of
the Sub-Advised Series’ outstanding
voting securities (or if the Sub-Advised
Series serves as a funding medium for
any sub-account of a registered separate
account, pursuant to voting instructions
provided by the unitholders of the subaccount), as defined in the Act, which
in the case of a new Sub-Advised Series
whose public shareholders (or variable
contract owners through a registered
separate account) purchase shares on
the basis of a prospectus containing the
disclosure contemplated by condition 2
below, by the sole initial shareholder
before offering the Sub-Advised Series’
shares to the public (or the variable
contract owners through a separate
account).
2. The prospectus for each SubAdvised Series, will disclose the
existence, substance, and effect of any
order granted pursuant to the
application. Each Sub-Advised Series
will hold itself out to the public as
employing the multi-manager structure
described in the application. A SubAdvised Series’ prospectus will
prominently disclose that the Adviser
has the ultimate responsibility, subject
to oversight by the Board, to oversee the
Sub-Advisers and recommend their
hiring, termination and replacement.
3. The Adviser will provide general
management services to a Sub-Advised
Series, including overall supervisory
responsibility for the general
management and investment of the SubAdvised Series’ assets. Subject to review
and approval of the Board, the Advisor
will (a) set a Sub-Advised Series’ overall
investment strategies, (b) evaluate,
10 Applicants will only comply with conditions 8
and 12 if they rely on the relief that would allow
them to provide Aggregate Fee Disclosure.
E:\FR\FM\28JNN1.SGM
28JNN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 125 / Friday, June 28, 2013 / Notices
select, and recommend Sub-Advisers to
manage all or a portion of a SubAdvised Series’ assets, and (c)
implement procedures reasonably
designed to ensure that Sub-Advisers
comply with a Sub-Advised Series’
investment objective, policies and
restrictions. Subject to review by the
Board, the Adviser will (a) when
appropriate, allocate and reallocate a
Sub-Advised Series’ assets among
multiple Sub-Advisers; and (b) monitor
and evaluate the performance of SubAdvisers.
4. A Sub-Advised Series will not
make any Ineligible Sub-Adviser
Changes without the approval of the
shareholders of the applicable SubAdvised Series.
5. A Sub-Advised Series will inform
shareholders (or, if the Sub-Advised
Series serves as a funding medium for
any sub-account of a registered separate
account, the Adviser will inform the
unitholders of the sub-account) of the
hiring of a new Sub-Adviser within 90
days after the hiring of the new SubAdviser pursuant to the Modified Notice
and Access Procedures.
6. At all times, at least a majority of
the Board will be Independent Board
Members, and the selection and
nomination of new or additional
Independent Board Members will be
placed within the discretion of the thenexisting Independent Board Members.
7. Independent Legal Counsel, as
defined in rule 0–1(a)(6) under the Act,
will be engaged to represent the
Independent Board Members. The
selection of such counsel will be within
the discretion of the then-existing
Independent Board Members.
8. The Adviser will provide the
Board, no less frequently than quarterly,
with information about the profitability
of the Adviser on a per Sub-Advised
Series basis. The information will reflect
the impact on profitability of the hiring
or termination of any sub-adviser during
the applicable quarter.
9. Whenever a sub-adviser is hired or
terminated, the Adviser will provide the
Board with information showing the
expected impact on the profitability of
the Adviser.
10. Whenever a sub-adviser change is
proposed for a Sub-Advised Series with
an Affiliated Sub-Adviser or a WhollyOwned Sub-Adviser, the Board,
including a majority of the Independent
Board Members, will make a separate
finding, reflected in the Board minutes,
that such change is in the best interests
of the Sub-Advised Series and its
shareholders and does not involve a
conflict of interest from which the
Adviser or the Affiliated Sub-Adviser or
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:17 Jun 27, 2013
Jkt 229001
Wholly-Owned Sub-Adviser derives an
inappropriate advantage.
11. No Board member or officer of a
Sub-Advised Series, or director or
officer of the Adviser, will own directly
or indirectly (other than through a
pooled investment vehicle that is not
controlled by such person), any interest
in a Sub-Adviser, except: (1) For
ownership of interests in the Adviser or
any entity, except a Wholly-Owned SubAdviser, that controls, is controlled by,
or is under common control with the
Adviser; or (2) for the ownership of less
than 1% of the outstanding securities of
any class of equity or debt of a publiclytraded company that is either a SubAdviser or an entity that controls, is
controlled by, or is under common
control with a Sub-Adviser.
12. Each Sub-Advised Series will
disclose the Aggregate Fee Disclosure in
its registration statement.
13. In the event the Commission
adopts a rule under the Act providing
substantially similar relief to that
requested in the application, the
requested order will expire on the
effective date of that rule.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Investment Management, under delegated
authority.
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–15506 Filed 6–27–13; 8:45 am]
39027
The subject matter of the Closed
Meeting scheduled for Tuesday, July 2,
2013 will be:
Institution and settlement of
injunctive actions;
institution and settlement of
administrative proceedings;
adjudicatory matters; and
other matters relating to enforcement
proceedings.
At times, changes in Commission
priorities require alterations in the
scheduling of meeting items.
For further information and to
ascertain what, if any, matters have been
added, deleted or postponed, please
contact the Office of the Secretary at
(202) 551–5400.
Dated: June 25, 2013.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–15580 Filed 6–26–13; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–69838; File No. 600–23]
Order Granting the Fixed Income
Clearing Corporation’s Amended
Application for Permanent Registration
as a Clearing Agency
June 24, 2013.
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
I. Introduction
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Sunshine Act Meetings
Notice is hereby given, pursuant to
the provisions of the Government in the
Sunshine Act, Public Law 94–409, that
the Securities and Exchange
Commission will hold a Closed Meeting
on Tuesday, July 2, 2013 at 11:00 a.m.
Commissioners, Counsel to the
Commissioners, the Secretary to the
Commission, and recording secretaries
will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain
staff members who have an interest in
the matters also may be present.
The General Counsel of the
Commission, or his designee, has
certified that, in his opinion, one or
more of the exemptions set forth in 5
U.S.C. 552b(c)(5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and
17 CFR 200.402(a)(5), (7), 9(ii) and (10),
permit consideration of the scheduled
matters at the Closed Meeting.
Commissioner Paredes, as duty
officer, voted to consider the items
listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed
session.
PO 00000
Frm 00116
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
On April 5, 2013, the Fixed Income
Clearing Corporation (‘‘FICC’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) an
amended application on Form CA–1 1
seeking permanent registration as a
clearing agency under Sections 17A and
19(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 17Ab2–1
thereunder.3 Notice of the amended
application was published in the
Federal Register on April 17, 2013.4
The Commission received no comments
on the notice. This Order grants FICC
1 See Letter from Donaldine Temple, Senior
Associate Counsel and Corporate Secretary, FICC, to
Joseph P. Kamnik, Assistant Director, Division of
Trading and Markets, Securities and Exchange
Commission (April 4, 2013). The amendment filed
by FICC updates all of the information required by
Form CA–1, and incorporates by reference all
information submitted in connection with FICC’s
prior application and amendments thereto, to the
extent not otherwise superseded by proposed rule
changes filed pursuant to Section 19(b) of the Act
or by FICC’s amended Form CA–1.
2 15 U.S.C. 78q–1; 15 U.S.C. 78s(a).
3 17 CFR 240.17Ab2–1.
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 69362
(April 11, 2013), 78 FR 22923–01 (April 17, 2013)
(File No. 600–23).
E:\FR\FM\28JNN1.SGM
28JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 125 (Friday, June 28, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39023-39027]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-15506]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Investment Company Act Release No. 30566; File No. 812-14111]
ING Investments, LLC, et al.; Notice of Application
June 24, 2013.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'').
ACTION: Notice of an application under section 6(c) of the Investment
Company Act of 1940 (``Act'') for an exemption from section 15(a) of
the Act and rule
[[Page 39024]]
18f-2 under the Act, as well as from certain disclosure requirements.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary of Application: Applicants request an order that would
amend and supersede a prior order (the ``Non-Affiliated Sub-Adviser
Order'') \1\ that permits them to enter into and materially amend
subadvisory agreements for certain multi-managed funds with non-
affiliated sub-advisers without shareholder approval and grants relief
from certain disclosure requirements. The requested order would permit
applicants to enter into, and amend, such agreements with Wholly-Owned
Sub-Advisers (as defined below) and non-affiliated sub-advisers without
shareholder approval.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Portfolio Partners, Inc., et al., Investment Company Act
Release Nos. 25558 (Apr. 30, 2002) (notice) and 25592 (May 24, 2002)
(order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicants: ING Balanced Portfolio, Inc., ING Equity Trust, ING
Funds Trust, ING Intermediate Bond Portfolio, ING Investors Trust, ING
Mayflower Trust, ING Money Market Portfolio, ING Mutual Funds, ING
Partners, Inc., ING Separate Portfolios Trust, ING Series Fund, Inc.,
ING Strategic Allocation Portfolios, Inc., ING Variable Funds, ING
Variable Insurance Trust, ING Variable Portfolios Inc., and ING
Variable Products Trust (each an ``ING Investment Company'' and
collectively, the ``ING Investment Companies''), and Directed Services
LLC (``DSL''), ING Investments, LLC (``IIL''), and ING Investment
Management Co. LLC (``IIM'').
Filing Dates: The application was filed on January 11, 2013, and
amended on April 15, 2013, and June 21, 2013.
Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An order granting the
application will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing.
Interested persons may request a hearing by writing to the Commission's
Secretary and serving applicants with a copy of the request, personally
or by mail. Hearing requests should be received by the Commission by
5:30 p.m. on July 19, 2013, and should be accompanied by proof of
service on applicants, in the form of an affidavit or, for lawyers, a
certificate of service. Hearing requests should state the nature of the
writer's interest, the reason for the request, and the issues
contested. Persons who wish to be notified of a hearing may request
notification by writing to the Commission's Secretary.
ADDRESSES: Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090. Applicants, c/
o Huey P. Falgout, Jr., Chief Counsel, ING Funds, 7337 East Doubletree
Ranch Road, Suite 100, Scottsdale, AZ 85255.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laura L. Solomon, Senior Attorney, at
(202) 551-6915, or Daniele Marchesani, Branch Chief, at (202) 551-6821
(Division of Investment Management, Exemptive Applications Office).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the
application. The complete application may be obtained via the
Commission's Web site by searching for the file number or an applicant
using the Company name box, at https://www.sec.gov/search/search.htm or
by calling (202) 551-8090.
Applicants' Representations
1. Each ING Investment Company is organized as a Massachusetts
business trust, a Delaware statutory trust, or a Maryland corporation
and is registered with the Commission as an open-end management
investment company under the Act. Each ING Investment Company may offer
one or more series of shares (each a ``Series'' and collectively,
``Series'') with its own distinct investment objectives, policies and
restrictions.\2\ Each Series has, or will have, as its investment
adviser, Directed Services LLC (``DSL''), ING Investments, LLC
(``IIL'') or ING Investment Management Co. LLC (``IIM''), or another
investment adviser controlling, controlled by or under common control
with IIL, DSL, or IIM or their successors (each, an ``Adviser'' and,
collectively with the Series and the ING Investment Companies, the
``Applicants'').\3\ The Advisers are each an indirect, wholly-owned
subsidiary of ING U.S. Inc., which in turn, is a wholly owned
subsidiary of ING Groep N.V. (``ING Groep''). ING Groep is a global
financial institution of Dutch origin offering banking, investments,
life insurance and retirement services.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The term ``Series'' also includes the ING Investment
Companies listed above that do not offer multiple series.
\3\ Each Adviser is or will be registered with the Commission as
an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as
amended (``Advisers Act''). For purposes of the requested order,
``successor'' is limited to an entity that results from a
reorganization into another jurisdiction or a change in the type of
business organization.
\4\ Applicants request that the relief apply to the Applicants,
as well as to any future Series and any other existing or future
registered open-end management investment company or series thereof
that is advised by an Adviser, uses the multi-manager structure
described in the application, and complies with the terms and
conditions of the application (``Sub-Advised Series''). All
registered open-end investment companies that currently intend to
rely on the requested order are named as Applicants. All Series that
currently are, or that currently intend to be, Sub-Advised Series
are identified in the application. Any entity that relies on the
requested order will do so only in accordance with the terms and
conditions contained the application. The requested relief will not
extend to any sub-adviser, other than a Wholly-Owned Sub-Adviser (as
defined below), who is an affiliated person, as defined in section
2(a)(3) of the Act, of the Sub-Advised Series, or of the Adviser,
other than by reason of serving as a sub-adviser to one or more of
the Sub-Advised Series (``Affiliated Sub-Adviser'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. An Adviser serves as the investment adviser to each Series that
it manages pursuant to an investment advisory agreement with the
applicable ING Investment Company (``Investment Management
Agreement''). The Investment Management Agreement for each existing
Series was approved by the board of trustees/directors of the
applicable ING Investment Company (the ``Board''), including a majority
of the members of the Board who are not ``interested persons'', as
defined in section 2(a)(19) of the Act, of the Series or the Adviser
(``Independent Board Members'') and by the shareholders of that Series
as required by sections 15(a) and 15(c) of the Act and rule 18f-2
thereunder. The terms of these Investment Management Agreements comply
with section 15(a) of the Act. Each Investment Management Agreement
will comply with section 15(a) of the Act and will be similarly
approved.
3. Under the terms of each Investment Management Agreement, the
relevant Adviser, subject to the supervision of the Board, provides
continuous investment management of the assets of the relevant Series.
The Adviser periodically reviews a Series' investment policies and
strategies and based on the need of a particular Series may recommend
changes to the investment policies and strategies of the Series for
consideration by the Board. For its services to each Series under the
applicable Investment Management Agreement, the Adviser receives an
investment management fee from that Series based on the average net
assets of that Series. Certain Series of IIT operate under a
``unified'' fee arrangement as further described in the application.
The terms of each Investment Management Agreement permit the Adviser,
subject to the approval of the Board, including a majority of the
Independent Board Members, and the shareholders of the applicable Sub-
Advised Series (if required), to delegate portfolio management
responsibilities of all or a portion of the assets of a Sub-Advised
Series to one or more Sub-Advisers.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ As used herein, a ``Sub-Adviser'' is (1) an indirect or
direct ``wholly-owned subsidiary'' (as such term is defined in the
Act) of the Adviser for that Series, or (2) a sister company of the
Adviser for that Series that is an indirect or direct ``wholly-owned
subsidiary'' (as such term is defined in the Act) of the same
company that, indirectly or directly, wholly owns the Adviser (each
of (1) and (2) a ``Wholly-Owned Sub-Adviser'' and collectively, the
``Wholly-Owned Sub-Advisers''), or (3) not an ``affiliated person''
(as such term is defined in section 2(a)(3) of the Act) of the
Series, the applicable ING Investment Company, or an Adviser, except
to the extent that an affiliation arises solely because the Sub-
Adviser serves as a Sub-Adviser to a Series (each a ``Non-Affiliated
Sub-Adviser'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 39025]]
4. Applicants request an order to permit an Adviser, subject to the
approval of the Board, including a majority of the Independent Board
Members, to, without obtaining shareholder approval: (i) Select Sub-
Advisers to manage all or a portion of the assets of a Series and enter
into Sub-Advisory Agreements (as defined below) with the Sub-Advisers,
and (ii) materially amend Sub-Advisory Agreements with the Sub-
Advisers.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Shareholder approval will continue to be required for any
other sub-adviser change (not otherwise permitted by rule or other
action of the Commission or staff) and material amendments to an
existing sub-advisory agreement with any sub-adviser other than a
Non-Affiliated Sub-Adviser or a Wholly-Owned Sub-Adviser (all such
changes referred to as ``Ineligible Affiliated Sub-Adviser
Changes'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Pursuant to each Investment Management Agreement, the Adviser
has overall responsibility for the management and investment of the
assets of each Sub-Advised Series; these responsibilities include
recommending the removal or replacement of Sub-Advisers, determining
the portion of that Sub-Advised Series' assets to be managed by any
given Sub-Adviser and reallocating those assets as necessary from time
to time. In accordance with each Investment Management Agreement, the
Adviser will supervise each Sub-Adviser in its performance of its
duties with a view to preventing violations of the federal securities
laws.
6. The Advisers have entered into sub-advisory agreements with Sub-
Advisers (``Sub-Advisory Agreements'') to provide investment management
services to the Subadvised Series.\7\ The terms of each Sub-Advisory
Agreement comply fully with the requirements of section 15(a) of the
Act and were approved by the applicable Board, including a majority of
the Independent Board Members, and, to the extent that the Non-
Affiliated Sub-Adviser Order did not apply (or was not relied upon),
the shareholders of the Sub-Advised Series in accordance with sections
15(a) and 15(c) of the Act and rule 18f-2 thereunder. The Sub-Advisers,
subject to the supervision of the Advisers and oversight of the Board,
determine the securities and other instruments to be purchased or sold
or entered into by a Sub-Advised Series and place orders with brokers
or dealers that they select. Each Adviser will compensate each Sub-
Adviser out of the fee paid to the Adviser under the relevant
Investment Management Agreement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ If the name of any Sub-Advised Series contains the name of a
Sub-Adviser, the name of the Adviser that serves as the primary
adviser to the Sub-Advised Series, or a trademark or trade name that
is owned by or publicly used to identity that Adviser, will precede
the name of the Sub-Adviser.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
7. Sub-Advised Series will inform shareholders of the hiring of a
new Sub-Adviser pursuant to the following procedures (``Modified Notice
and Access Procedures''): (a) Within 90 days after a new Sub-Adviser is
hired for any Sub-Advised Series, that Sub-Advised Series will send its
shareholders \8\ either a Multi-Manager Notice or a Multi-Manager
Notice and Multi-Manager Information Statement; \9\ and (b) the Sub-
Advised Series will make the Multi-Manager Information Statement
available on the Web site identified in the Multi-Manager Notice no
later than when the Multi-Manager Notice (or Multi-Manager Notice and
Multi-Manager Information Statement) is first sent to shareholders, and
will maintain it on that Web site for at least 90 days. In the
circumstances described in the application, a proxy solicitation to
approve the appointment of new Sub-Advisers provides no more meaningful
information to shareholders than the proposed Multi-Manager Information
Statement. Applicants state that each Board would comply with the
requirements of sections 15(a) and 15(c) of the Act before entering
into or amending Sub-Advisory Agreements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ The term ``shareholders'' as used in the application
includes variable contract holders, insurance companies, plan
participants, or plan trustees entitled to give voting instructions
with respect to a fund.
\9\ A ``Multi-Manager Notice'' will be modeled on a Notice of
Internet Availability as defined in rule 14a-16 under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Exchange Act''), and specifically will,
among other things: (a) Summarize the relevant information regarding
the new Sub-Adviser; (b) inform shareholders that the Multi-Manager
Information Statement is available on a Web site; (c) provide the
Web site address; (d) state the time period during which the Multi-
Manager Information Statement will remain available on that Web
site; (e) provide instructions for accessing and printing the Multi-
Manager Information Statement; and (f) instruct the shareholder that
a paper or email copy of the Multi-Manager Information Statement may
be obtained, without charge, by contacting the Sub-Advised Series.
A ``Multi-Manager Information Statement'' will meet the
requirements of Regulation 14C, Schedule 14C and Item 22 of Schedule
14A under the Exchange Act for an information statement, except as
modified by the order to permit Aggregate Fee Disclosure, as defined
below. Multi-Manager Information Statements will be filed with the
Commission via the EDGAR system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
8. Applicants also request an order exempting the Sub-Advised
Series from certain disclosure obligations that may require the
Applicants to disclose fees paid by the Adviser to each Sub-Adviser.
Applicants seek relief to permit each Sub-Advised Series to disclose
(as a dollar amount and a percentage of the Sub-Advised Series' net
assets): (a) The aggregate fees paid to the Adviser and any Wholly-
Owned Sub-Adviser; (b) the aggregate fees paid to Non-Affiliated Sub-
Advisers; and (c) the fee paid to each Affiliated Sub-Adviser
(collectively, the ``Aggregate Fee Disclosure'').
Applicants' Legal Analysis
1. Section 15(a) of the Act states, in part, that it is unlawful
for any person to act as an investment adviser to a registered
investment company ``except pursuant to a written contract, which
contract, whether with such registered company or with an investment
adviser of such registered company, has been approved by the vote of a
majority of the outstanding voting securities of such registered
company.'' Rule 18f-2 under the Act states that any ``matter required
to be submitted . . . to the holders of the outstanding voting
securities of a series company shall not be deemed to have been
effectively acted upon unless approved by the holders of a majority of
the outstanding voting securities of each class or series of stock
affected by such matter.'' Further, rule 18(f)-2(c)(1) under the Act
provides that a vote to approve an investment advisory contract
required by section 15(a) of the Act ``shall be deemed to be
effectively acted upon with respect to any class or series of
securities of such [registered investment] company if a majority of the
outstanding voting securities of such class or series vote for the
approval of such matter.''
2. Form N-1A is the registration statement used by open-end
investment companies. Item 19(a)(3) of Form N-1A requires a registered
investment company to disclose in its statement of additional
information the method of computing the ``advisory fee payable'' by the
investment company, including the total dollar amounts that the
investment company ``paid to the adviser (aggregated with amounts paid
to affiliated advisers, if any), and any advisers who are not
affiliated persons of the adviser, under the investment advisory
contract for the last three fiscal years.''
3. Rule 20a-1 under the Act requires proxies solicited with respect
to a registered investment company to
[[Page 39026]]
comply with Schedule 14A under the Exchange Act. Items 22(c)(1)(ii),
22(c)(1)(iii), 22(c)(8) and 22(c)(9) of Schedule 14A, taken together,
require a proxy statement for a shareholder meeting at which the
advisory contract will be voted upon to include the ``rate of
compensation of the investment adviser,'' the ``aggregate amount of the
investment adviser's fee,'' a description of the ``terms of the
contract to be acted upon,'' and, if a change in the advisory fee is
proposed, the existing and proposed fees and the difference between the
two fees.
4. Regulation S-X sets forth the requirements for financial
statements required to be included as part of a registered investment
company's registration statement and shareholder reports filed with the
Commission. Sections 6-07(2)(a), (b), and (c) of Regulation S-X require
a registered investment company to include in its financial statement
information about the investment advisory fees.
5. Section 6(c) of the Act provides that the Commission by order
upon application may conditionally or unconditionally exempt any
person, security, or transaction or any class or classes of persons,
securities, or transactions from any provisions of the Act, or from any
rule thereunder, if such exemption is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest and consistent with the protection of investors and the
purposes fairly intended by the policy and provisions of the Act.
Applicants state that their requested relief meets this standard for
the reasons discussed below.
6. Applicants assert that the shareholders expect the Advisers,
subject to review and approval of the Board, to select Sub-Advisers who
the Advisers believe can achieve the Sub-Advised Series' investment
objectives. Applicants assert that, from the perspective of the
shareholder, the role of the Sub-Advisers is substantially equivalent
to the role of the individual portfolio managers employed by an
investment adviser to a traditional investment company. Applicants
believe that permitting the Adviser to perform the duties for which the
shareholders of the Sub-Advised Series are paying the Adviser--the
selection, supervision and evaluation of the Sub-Advisers, including
Wholly-Owned Sub-Advisers--without incurring unnecessary delays or
expenses is appropriate in the interest of the Sub-Advised Series'
shareholders and will allow such Sub-Advised Series to operate more
efficiently. Applicants state that each Investment Management Agreement
will continue to be fully subject to section 15(a) of the Act and rule
18f-2 under the Act and approved by the Board, including a majority of
the Independent Board Members, in the manner required by sections 15(a)
and 15(c) of the Act. Applicants are not seeking an exemption with
respect to the Investment Management Agreements.
7. Applicants assert that disclosure of the individual fees that
the Adviser would pay to the Sub-Advisers that operate under the multi-
manager structure described in the application would not serve any
meaningful purpose. Applicants contend that the primary reasons for
requiring disclosure of individual fees paid to Sub-Advisers are to
inform shareholders of expenses to be charged by a particular Sub-
Advised Series and to enable shareholders to compare the fees to those
of other comparable investment companies. Applicants believe that the
requested relief satisfies these objectives because the advisory fee
paid to the Adviser will be fully disclosed and, therefore,
shareholders will know what the Sub-Advised Series' fees and expenses
are and will be able to compare the advisory fees a Sub-Advised Series
is charged to those of other investment companies. Applicants assert
that the requested disclosure relief would benefit shareholders of the
Sub-Advised Series because it would improve the Adviser's ability to
negotiate the fees paid to Sub-Advisers. Applicants state that the
Adviser may be able to negotiate rates that are below a Sub-Adviser's
``posted'' amounts if the Adviser is not required to disclose the Sub-
Advisers' fees to the public. Applicants submit that the relief
requested to use Aggregate Fee Disclosure will encourage Sub-Advisers
to negotiate lower subadvisory fees with the Adviser if the lower fees
are not required to be made public.
8. For the reasons discussed above, Applicants submit that the
requested relief meets the standards for relief under section 6(c) of
the Act. Applicants state that the operation of the Sub-Advised Series
in the manner described in the application must be approved by
shareholders of a Sub-Advised Series before that Sub-Advised Series may
rely on the requested relief. In addition, Applicants state that the
proposed conditions to the requested relief are designed to address any
potential conflicts of interest, including any posed by the use of
Wholly-Owned Sub-Advisers, and provide that shareholders are informed
when new Sub-Advisers are hired. Applicants assert that conditions 6,
7, 10 and 11 are designed to provide the Board with sufficient
independence and the resources and information it needs to monitor and
address any conflicts of interest with affiliated person of the
Adviser, including Wholly-Owned Sub-Advisers. Applicants state that,
accordingly, they believe the requested relief is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest and consistent with the protection
of investors and the purposes fairly intended by the policy and
provisions of the Act.
Applicants' Conditions
Applicants agree that any order granting the requested relief will
be subject to the following conditions: \10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Applicants will only comply with conditions 8 and 12 if
they rely on the relief that would allow them to provide Aggregate
Fee Disclosure.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Before a Sub-Advised Series may rely on the order requested in
the application, the operation of the Sub-Advised Series in the manner
described in the application, including the hiring of Wholly-Owned Sub-
Advisers, will be, or has been, approved by a majority of the Sub-
Advised Series' outstanding voting securities (or if the Sub-Advised
Series serves as a funding medium for any sub-account of a registered
separate account, pursuant to voting instructions provided by the
unitholders of the sub-account), as defined in the Act, which in the
case of a new Sub-Advised Series whose public shareholders (or variable
contract owners through a registered separate account) purchase shares
on the basis of a prospectus containing the disclosure contemplated by
condition 2 below, by the sole initial shareholder before offering the
Sub-Advised Series' shares to the public (or the variable contract
owners through a separate account).
2. The prospectus for each Sub-Advised Series, will disclose the
existence, substance, and effect of any order granted pursuant to the
application. Each Sub-Advised Series will hold itself out to the public
as employing the multi-manager structure described in the application.
A Sub-Advised Series' prospectus will prominently disclose that the
Adviser has the ultimate responsibility, subject to oversight by the
Board, to oversee the Sub-Advisers and recommend their hiring,
termination and replacement.
3. The Adviser will provide general management services to a Sub-
Advised Series, including overall supervisory responsibility for the
general management and investment of the Sub-Advised Series' assets.
Subject to review and approval of the Board, the Advisor will (a) set a
Sub-Advised Series' overall investment strategies, (b) evaluate,
[[Page 39027]]
select, and recommend Sub-Advisers to manage all or a portion of a Sub-
Advised Series' assets, and (c) implement procedures reasonably
designed to ensure that Sub-Advisers comply with a Sub-Advised Series'
investment objective, policies and restrictions. Subject to review by
the Board, the Adviser will (a) when appropriate, allocate and
reallocate a Sub-Advised Series' assets among multiple Sub-Advisers;
and (b) monitor and evaluate the performance of Sub-Advisers.
4. A Sub-Advised Series will not make any Ineligible Sub-Adviser
Changes without the approval of the shareholders of the applicable Sub-
Advised Series.
5. A Sub-Advised Series will inform shareholders (or, if the Sub-
Advised Series serves as a funding medium for any sub-account of a
registered separate account, the Adviser will inform the unitholders of
the sub-account) of the hiring of a new Sub-Adviser within 90 days
after the hiring of the new Sub-Adviser pursuant to the Modified Notice
and Access Procedures.
6. At all times, at least a majority of the Board will be
Independent Board Members, and the selection and nomination of new or
additional Independent Board Members will be placed within the
discretion of the then-existing Independent Board Members.
7. Independent Legal Counsel, as defined in rule 0-1(a)(6) under
the Act, will be engaged to represent the Independent Board Members.
The selection of such counsel will be within the discretion of the
then-existing Independent Board Members.
8. The Adviser will provide the Board, no less frequently than
quarterly, with information about the profitability of the Adviser on a
per Sub-Advised Series basis. The information will reflect the impact
on profitability of the hiring or termination of any sub-adviser during
the applicable quarter.
9. Whenever a sub-adviser is hired or terminated, the Adviser will
provide the Board with information showing the expected impact on the
profitability of the Adviser.
10. Whenever a sub-adviser change is proposed for a Sub-Advised
Series with an Affiliated Sub-Adviser or a Wholly-Owned Sub-Adviser,
the Board, including a majority of the Independent Board Members, will
make a separate finding, reflected in the Board minutes, that such
change is in the best interests of the Sub-Advised Series and its
shareholders and does not involve a conflict of interest from which the
Adviser or the Affiliated Sub-Adviser or Wholly-Owned Sub-Adviser
derives an inappropriate advantage.
11. No Board member or officer of a Sub-Advised Series, or director
or officer of the Adviser, will own directly or indirectly (other than
through a pooled investment vehicle that is not controlled by such
person), any interest in a Sub-Adviser, except: (1) For ownership of
interests in the Adviser or any entity, except a Wholly-Owned Sub-
Adviser, that controls, is controlled by, or is under common control
with the Adviser; or (2) for the ownership of less than 1% of the
outstanding securities of any class of equity or debt of a publicly-
traded company that is either a Sub-Adviser or an entity that controls,
is controlled by, or is under common control with a Sub-Adviser.
12. Each Sub-Advised Series will disclose the Aggregate Fee
Disclosure in its registration statement.
13. In the event the Commission adopts a rule under the Act
providing substantially similar relief to that requested in the
application, the requested order will expire on the effective date of
that rule.
For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management,
under delegated authority.
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-15506 Filed 6-27-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P