Certain Polyester Staple Fiber From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2011-2012, 38939-38941 [2013-15459]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 125 / Friday, June 28, 2013 / Notices Background On March 22, 2013, the Department published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on PSF from Taiwan.1 We invited interested parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. None were received. The Department has conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Scope of the Order The product covered by the order is PSF. PSF is defined as synthetic staple fibers, not carded, combed or otherwise processed for spinning, of polyesters measuring 3.3 decitex (3 denier, inclusive) or more in diameter. This merchandise is cut to lengths varying from one inch (25 mm) to five inches (127 mm). The merchandise subject to the order may be coated, usually with a silicon or other finish, or not coated. PSF is generally used as stuffing in sleeping bags, mattresses, ski jackets, comforters, cushions, pillows, and furniture. Merchandise of less than 3.3 decitex (less than 3 denier) currently classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) at subheading 5503.20.00.20 is specifically excluded from the order. Also specifically excluded from the order are PSF of 10 to 18 denier that are cut to lengths of 6 to 8 inches (fibers used in the manufacture of carpeting). In addition, low-melt PSF is excluded from the order. Low-melt PSF is defined as a bi-component fiber with an outer sheath that melts at a significantly lower temperature than its inner core. The merchandise subject to the order is currently classifiable in the HTSUS at subheadings 5503.20.00.40, 5503.20.00.45, 5503.20.00.60, and 5503.20.00.65. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise subject to the order is dispositive. Final Determination of No Shipments For the final results of this review, we determine that Nan Ya had no shipments during the POR. tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Final Results of the Review The Department made no changes to its calculations announced in the Preliminary Results. As a result of our review, we determine that a weighted1 See Polyester Staple Fiber From Taiwan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2011–2012, 78 FR 17637 (March 22, 2013) (Preliminary Results). VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:17 Jun 27, 2013 Jkt 229001 average dumping margin of 0.00 percent exists for FENC for the POR. Assessment Rates In accordance with the Final Modification,2 the Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate entries for FENC without regard to antidumping duties. The Department clarified its ‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on May 6, 2003.3 This clarification will apply to entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by FENC for which it did not know its merchandise was destined for the United States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction. Consistent with the Assessment Policy Notice, because we continue to find that Nan Ya had no shipments of subject merchandise to the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate any applicable entries of subject merchandise at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction. We intend to issue instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this review. Cash Deposit Requirements The following deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for all shipments of PSF from Taiwan entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication as provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for FENC will be 0.00 percent, the weighted average dumping margin established in the final results of this administrative review; (2) for Nan Ya and previously reviewed or investigated companies not listed above, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original investigation but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the manufacturer of the merchandise for the 2 See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102 (February 14, 2012) (Final Modification). 3 For a full discussion of this clarification, see Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Assessment Policy Notice). PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 38939 most recently completed segment of this proceeding; (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 7.31 percent, the allothers rate established in the Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Polyester Staple Fiber From the Republic of Korea and Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Polyester Staple Fiber From the Republic of Korea and Taiwan, 65 FR 33807 (May 25, 2000). These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. The Department is issuing and publishing these final results of administrative review in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: June 20, 2013. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. 2013–15448 Filed 6–27–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–905] Certain Polyester Staple Fiber From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2011–2012 Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\28JNN1.SGM 28JNN1 38940 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 125 / Friday, June 28, 2013 / Notices On March 6, 2013, the Department of Commerce (the ‘‘Department’’) published the Preliminary Results of the 2011–2012 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain polyester staple fiber (‘‘PSF’’) from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’).1 The period of review (‘‘POR’’) is June 1, 2011, through May 31, 2012. We received no comments from interested parties. The final dumping margin is listed in the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section below. DATES: Effective Date: June 28, 2013. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven Hampton, AD/CVD Operations, Office 9, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0116. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Background On March 6, 2013, the Department published the Preliminary Results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain polyester staple fiber from the PRC. We invited interested parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. None were received. The Department has conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’). Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the order is synthetic staple fibers, not carded, combed or otherwise processed for spinning, of polyesters measuring 3.3 decitex (3 denier, inclusive) or more in diameter. This merchandise is cut to lengths varying from one inch (25 mm) to five inches (127 mm). The subject merchandise may be coated, usually with a silicon or other finish, or not coated. PSF is generally used as stuffing in sleeping bags, mattresses, ski jackets, comforters, cushions, pillows, and furniture. The following products are excluded from the scope of the order: (1) PSF of less than 3.3 decitex (less than 3 denier) currently classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) at 5503.20.0025 and known to the industry as PSF for spinning and generally used in woven and knit applications to produce textile and 1 See Certain Polyester Staple Fiber From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Rescission in Part of the 2011–2012 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 78 FR 14512 (March 6, 2013) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’). VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:17 Jun 27, 2013 Jkt 229001 apparel products; (2) PSF of 10 to 18 denier that are cut to lengths of 6 to 8 inches and that are generally used in the manufacture of carpeting; and (3) lowmelt PSF defined as a bi-component fiber with an outer, non-polyester sheath that melts at a significantly lower temperature than its inner polyester core (classified at HTSUS 5503.20.0015). Certain PSF is classifiable under the HTSUS numbers 5503.20.0045 and 5503.20.0065. Although the HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise under the order is dispositive. PRC-Wide Entity In the Preliminary Results, the Department noted that Far Eastern Industries (Shanghai) Ltd. and Far Eastern Polychem Industries (collectively ‘‘Far Eastern’’) does not have a separate rate, and, therefore, it is under review as part of the PRC-wide entity.2 Also in the Preliminary Results, the Department determined that Huvis Sichuan Chemical Fiber Corp. and Huvis Sichuan Polyester Fiber Ltd. (collectively ‘‘Huvis Sichuan’’) failed to demonstrate its continued eligibility for a separate rate, and is considered to be part of the PRC-wide entity. After issuing the Preliminary Results, the Department received no comments from interested parties. Therefore, for these final results, in accordance with section 776(a) and (b) of the Act, and as explained in more detail in the Preliminary Results, the Department continues to find that Far Eastern and Huvis Sichuan are part of the PRC-wide entity. Final Results of Review The Department has made no changes to the Preliminary Results. As a result of our review, we determine that a dumping margin of 44.3 percent exists for the PRC-wide entity 3 for the POR. Assessment Upon issuance of the final results, the Department will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review.4 The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 2 See Preliminary Results, 78 FR at 14513, and accompanying Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results and Rescission in Part of the 2011–2012 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Certain Polyester Staple Fiber from the People’s Republic of China at 5. 3 The PRC-wide entity includes Far Eastern and Huvis Sichuan. 4 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 days after the publication date of the final results of this review. The Department announced a refinement to its assessment practice in non-market economy (‘‘NME’’) cases.5 Pursuant to this refinement in practice, for entries that were not reported in the U.S. sales databases submitted by companies individually examined during this review, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the NME-wide rate. In addition, if the Department determines that an exporter under review had no shipments of the subject merchandise, any suspended entries that entered under that exporter’s case number (i.e., at that exporter’s rate) will be liquidated at the NME-wide rate.6 For the PRC-wide entity, we will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties at an ad valorem rate equal to the dumping margin published above. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this administrative review for shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results, as provided by sections 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters not listed above that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing exporterspecific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which that exporter participated; (2) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate for the PRC-wide entity, 44.30 percent; and (3) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notifications This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries 5 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011). 6 See id. E:\FR\FM\28JNN1.SGM 28JNN1 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 125 / Friday, June 28, 2013 / Notices during this POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties has occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to the administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. The Department is issuing and publishing these final results of administrative review in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. for the period of review (POR) of April 1, 2012, through March 31, 2013.1 On April 29, 2013, in accordance with section 751(a)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.213(b)(2), the Department received a timely request from Aquapharm Chemicals Pvt Ltd (Aquapharm), a producer and exporter of subject merchandise, to conduct an administrative review of its exports to the United States during the POR.2 No other interested party requested an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on HEDP from India for the POR. On June 3, 2013, the Department published in the Federal Register a notice of initiation of an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on HEDP from India.3 On June 4, 2013, Aquapharm timely withdrew its request for a review.4 Dated: June 20, 2013. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Department will rescind an administrative review, in whole or in part, if the parties that requested a review withdraw the request within 90 days of the date of publication of notice of initiation of the requested review. Aquapharm withdrew its request for review before the 90-day deadline, and no other party requested an administrative review of the antidumping duty order. Therefore, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), we are rescinding this review in whole. [FR Doc. 2013–15459 Filed 6–27–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–533–847] 1-Hydroxyethylidene-1, 1-Diphosphonic Acid From India: Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012–2013 Assessment Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. AGENCY: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brandon Custard or David Goldberger, AD/CVD Operations, Office 2, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC, 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1823 or (202) 482– 4136, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Background On April 2, 2013, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published in the Federal Register a notice of ‘‘Opportunity to Request Administrative Review’’ of the antidumping duty order on 1-hydroxyethylidene-1, 1-diphosphonic acid (HEDP) from India VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:17 Jun 27, 2013 Jkt 229001 Rescission of Review 1 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity to Request Administrative Review, 78 FR 19645, 19646 (April 2, 2013). 2 See April 29, 2013, letter from Aquapharm to the Department. 3 See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Request for Revocation in Part, 78 FR 33052, 33054 (June 3, 2013). 4 See June 4, 2013, letter from Aquapharm to the Department. Frm 00030 Notification to Importers This notice serves as the only reminder to importers of their responsibility, under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2), to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. This notice is published in accordance with section 751 of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). Dated: June 24, 2013. Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2013–15547 Filed 6–27–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE The Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. Antidumping duties shall be assessed at rates equal to the cash deposit of estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions directly to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register. PO 00000 38941 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 International Trade Administration [A–570–863] Honey From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2011–2012 Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: As discussed below, the U.S. Department of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) preliminarily determines that none of the companies remaining under review following the partial rescission of this administrative review have demonstrated their eligibility for a separate rate.1 As such, they remain part of the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’)-wide entity. If we adopt these preliminary results in the final results of review, the Department will instruct AGENCY: 1 See E:\FR\FM\28JNN1.SGM Attachment 1 to this notice. 28JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 125 (Friday, June 28, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38939-38941]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-15459]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-905]


Certain Polyester Staple Fiber From the People's Republic of 
China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2011-
2012

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.


[[Page 38940]]


SUMMARY: On March 6, 2013, the Department of Commerce (the 
``Department'') published the Preliminary Results of the 2011-2012 
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain 
polyester staple fiber (``PSF'') from the People's Republic of China 
(``PRC'').\1\ The period of review (``POR'') is June 1, 2011, through 
May 31, 2012. We received no comments from interested parties. The 
final dumping margin is listed in the ``Final Results of Review'' 
section below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Certain Polyester Staple Fiber From the People's 
Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Rescission in Part of the 
2011-2012 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 78 FR 14512 (March 
6, 2013) (``Preliminary Results'').

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: June 28, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven Hampton, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office 9, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0116.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On March 6, 2013, the Department published the Preliminary Results 
of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain 
polyester staple fiber from the PRC. We invited interested parties to 
comment on the Preliminary Results. None were received. The Department 
has conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 
751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act'').

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise subject to the order is synthetic staple fibers, 
not carded, combed or otherwise processed for spinning, of polyesters 
measuring 3.3 decitex (3 denier, inclusive) or more in diameter. This 
merchandise is cut to lengths varying from one inch (25 mm) to five 
inches (127 mm). The subject merchandise may be coated, usually with a 
silicon or other finish, or not coated. PSF is generally used as 
stuffing in sleeping bags, mattresses, ski jackets, comforters, 
cushions, pillows, and furniture.
    The following products are excluded from the scope of the order: 
(1) PSF of less than 3.3 decitex (less than 3 denier) currently 
classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States 
(``HTSUS'') at 5503.20.0025 and known to the industry as PSF for 
spinning and generally used in woven and knit applications to produce 
textile and apparel products; (2) PSF of 10 to 18 denier that are cut 
to lengths of 6 to 8 inches and that are generally used in the 
manufacture of carpeting; and (3) low-melt PSF defined as a bi-
component fiber with an outer, non-polyester sheath that melts at a 
significantly lower temperature than its inner polyester core 
(classified at HTSUS 5503.20.0015).
    Certain PSF is classifiable under the HTSUS numbers 5503.20.0045 
and 5503.20.0065. Although the HTSUS numbers are provided for 
convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the 
merchandise under the order is dispositive.

PRC-Wide Entity

    In the Preliminary Results, the Department noted that Far Eastern 
Industries (Shanghai) Ltd. and Far Eastern Polychem Industries 
(collectively ``Far Eastern'') does not have a separate rate, and, 
therefore, it is under review as part of the PRC-wide entity.\2\ Also 
in the Preliminary Results, the Department determined that Huvis 
Sichuan Chemical Fiber Corp. and Huvis Sichuan Polyester Fiber Ltd. 
(collectively ``Huvis Sichuan'') failed to demonstrate its continued 
eligibility for a separate rate, and is considered to be part of the 
PRC-wide entity. After issuing the Preliminary Results, the Department 
received no comments from interested parties. Therefore, for these 
final results, in accordance with section 776(a) and (b) of the Act, 
and as explained in more detail in the Preliminary Results, the 
Department continues to find that Far Eastern and Huvis Sichuan are 
part of the PRC-wide entity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See Preliminary Results, 78 FR at 14513, and accompanying 
Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results and Rescission in Part 
of the 2011-2012 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Certain 
Polyester Staple Fiber from the People's Republic of China at 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of Review

    The Department has made no changes to the Preliminary Results. As a 
result of our review, we determine that a dumping margin of 44.3 
percent exists for the PRC-wide entity \3\ for the POR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The PRC-wide entity includes Far Eastern and Huvis Sichuan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment

    Upon issuance of the final results, the Department will determine, 
and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') shall assess, 
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this 
review.\4\ The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to 
CBP 15 days after the publication date of the final results of this 
review. The Department announced a refinement to its assessment 
practice in non-market economy (``NME'') cases.\5\ Pursuant to this 
refinement in practice, for entries that were not reported in the U.S. 
sales databases submitted by companies individually examined during 
this review, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries 
at the NME-wide rate. In addition, if the Department determines that an 
exporter under review had no shipments of the subject merchandise, any 
suspended entries that entered under that exporter's case number (i.e., 
at that exporter's rate) will be liquidated at the NME-wide rate.\6\ 
For the PRC-wide entity, we will instruct CBP to assess antidumping 
duties at an ad valorem rate equal to the dumping margin published 
above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
    \5\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment 
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
    \6\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the final results of this administrative review for 
shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn 
from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the 
final results, as provided by sections 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For 
previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters not 
listed above that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this 
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing 
exporter-specific rate published for the most recently completed 
segment of this proceeding in which that exporter participated; (2) for 
all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be 
entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate for 
the PRC-wide entity, 44.30 percent; and (3) for all non-PRC exporters 
of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash 
deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that 
supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when 
imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.

Notifications

    This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries

[[Page 38941]]

during this POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result 
in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping 
duties has occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled 
antidumping duties.
    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to the 
administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility 
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written 
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or 
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to 
comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable 
violation.
    The Department is issuing and publishing these final results of 
administrative review in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 
777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: June 20, 2013.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013-15459 Filed 6-27-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P