Self-Regulatory Organizations; BATS Y-Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Related to Fees for Use of BATS Y-Exchange, Inc., 37868-37870 [2013-14965]

Agencies

• SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 121 (Monday, June 24, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37868-37870]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-14965]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-69794; File No. SR-BYX-2013-021]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; BATS Y-Exchange, Inc.; Notice of 
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Related to 
Fees for Use of BATS Y-Exchange, Inc.

June 18, 2013.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given 
that on June 13, 2013, BATS Y-Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or 
``BYX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II 
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The 
Exchange has designated the proposed rule change as one establishing or 
changing a member due, fee, or other charge imposed by the Exchange 
under Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) 
thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposed rule change effective upon 
filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to 
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the 
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend the fee schedule applicable to 
Members \5\ and non-members of the Exchange pursuant to BYX Rules 
15.1(a) and (c). Changes to the fee schedule pursuant to this proposal 
will be effective upon filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ A Member is any registered broker or dealer that has been 
admitted to membership in the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange's 
Web site at https://www.batstrading.com, at the principal office of the 
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to modify the Exchange's 
fee schedule effective June 13, 2013, in order to amend the way that 
the Exchange calculates rebates for removing liquidity from the 
Exchange.

[[Page 37869]]

Specifically, the Exchange is proposing to amend the methodology by 
which it determines the rebate that it will provide to Members for 
removing liquidity from the Exchange by excluding the last Friday of 
June from the calculation of both ADV \6\ and average daily TCV.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ As provided in the fee schedule, ``ADV'' means average daily 
volume calculated as the number of shares added or removed, 
combined, per day on a monthly basis; routed shares are not included 
in ADV calculation.
    \7\ As provided in the fee schedule ``TCV'' means total 
consolidated volume calculated as the volume reported by all 
exchanges and trade reporting facilities to a consolidated 
transaction reporting plan for the month for which the fees apply.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange currently offers a tiered structure for determining 
the rebates that Members receive for executions that remove liquidity 
from the Exchange.\8\ Under the tiered pricing structure, the Exchange 
provides different rebates to Members based on a Member's ADV as a 
percentage of average daily TCV. The Exchange notes that it is not 
proposing to modify any of the existing rebates or the percentage 
thresholds at which a Member may qualify for certain rebates. Rather, 
as mentioned above, the Exchange is proposing to modify its fee 
schedule in order to exclude trading activity occurring on the last 
Friday of June from the calculation of ADV and average daily TCV.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 64429 (May 6, 2011), 
76 FR 27694 (May 12, 2011) (Notice of filing and immediate 
effectiveness of proposed rule change related to fees for use of 
BATS Y-Exchange, Inc., which established tiered rebates based on ADV 
as a percentage of average daily TCV) (SR-BYX-2011-008).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange is proposing to exclude the last Friday of June from 
the definition of ADV and TCV because the last Friday of June is the 
day that Russell Investments reconstitutes its family of indexes 
(``Russell Rebalance''), resulting in particularly high trading 
volumes, much of which the Exchange believes derives from market 
participants who are not generally as active entering the market to 
rebalance their holdings in-line with the Russell Rebalance. The 
Exchange believes that trading occurring as a result of the Russell 
Rebalance can significantly skew the calculation of ADV and TCV. For 
example, since 2008, on the last Friday in June, the TCV has exceeded 
the average daily TCV for the preceding trading days in June by 
approximately 42% on average. The chart below reflects the TCV on the 
last Friday of June for each year dating to 2008 and compares it to the 
average daily TCV for the preceding trading days in the month of June.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                               MTD Average TCV
             Russell reconstitution date (RCD)                 TCV on RCD     as of day before    % Difference
                                                                                     RCD
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6/29/2012.................................................     7,924,340,355     6,833,486,672             15.96
6/24/2011.................................................    10,472,502,657     7,237,593,514             44.70
6/25/2010.................................................    14,482,717,113     8,981,067,278             61.26
6/26/2009.................................................    13,024,518,377     9,597,498,903             35.71
6/27/2008.................................................    12,010,692,402     7,835,813,201             53.28
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Because of the extremely high volume numbers and abnormally 
distributed daily volume as a percentage of the TCV on this day, it 
stands that the ADV as a percentage of average daily TCV can be 
significantly impacted.
    As such, the Exchange believes that eliminating the last Friday of 
June from the definition of ADV and TCV and thereby eliminating that 
day from the calculation as it relates to rebates for removing 
liquidity from the Exchange, will help to eliminate significant 
uncertainty faced by Members as to their monthly ADV as a percentage of 
average daily TCV and the rebates that this percentage will qualify 
for, providing Members with an increased certainty as to their monthly 
cost for trades executed on the Exchange. The Exchange further believes 
that removing this uncertainty will encourage Members to participate in 
trading on the Exchange during the remaining trading days in June in a 
manner intended to be incented by the Exchange's fee schedule.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent 
with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations 
thereunder that are applicable to a national securities exchange, and, 
in particular, with the requirements of Section 6 of the Act.\9\ 
Specifically, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is 
consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\10\ in that it provides for 
the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges 
among members and other persons using any facility or system which the 
Exchange operates or controls. The Exchange notes that it operates in a 
highly competitive market in which market participants can readily 
direct order flow to competing venues if they deem fee structures at a 
particular venue to be unreasonable and/or excessive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    With respect to the proposed changes to the tiered pricing 
structure for removing liquidity from the Exchange, the Exchange 
believes that its proposal is reasonable because, as explained above, 
it will help provide Members with a greater level of certainty as to 
their level of rebates for trading in the month of June. The Exchange 
also believes that its proposal is reasonable because it is not 
changing the thresholds to become eligible or the dollar value 
associated with the rebates and, moreover, by eliminating the inclusion 
of a trading day that would almost certainly lower a Member's ADV as a 
percentage of average daily TCV, it will make the majority of Members 
more likely to meet the minimum or higher tier thresholds, which will 
provide additional incentive to Members to increase their participation 
on the Exchange in order to meet the next tier. In addition, the 
Exchange believes that the proposed changes to fees are equitably 
allocated among Exchange constituents as the methodology for 
calculating ADV and TCV will apply equally to all Members. While, 
although unlikely, certain Members may have a higher ADV as a 
percentage of average daily TCV with the day included, the proposal 
will make June trading rebates more similar to other months as well as 
to make all Members' cost of trading on the Exchange more predictable, 
regardless of how the proposal affects their ADV as a percentage of 
average daily TCV.
    Volume-based tiers such as the liquidity removing tiers maintained 
by the Exchange have been widely adopted in the equities markets, and 
are equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because they are open to 
all members on an equal basis and

[[Page 37870]]

provide rebates that are reasonably related to the value to an 
exchange's market quality associated with higher levels of market 
activity, such as higher levels of liquidity provision and introduction 
of higher volumes of orders into the price and volume discovery 
process. Accordingly, the Exchange believes that the proposal is 
equitably allocated and not unfairly discriminatory because it is 
consistent with the overall goals of enhancing market quality. Further, 
the Exchange believes that a tiered pricing model not significantly 
altered by a single known day of atypical trading behavior which allows 
Members to predictably calculate what their costs associated with 
trading activity on the Exchange will be is reasonable, fair and 
equitable and not unreasonably discriminatory as it is uniform in 
application amongst Members and should enable such participants to 
operate their business without concern of unpredictable and potentially 
significant changes in expenses.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in 
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed changes will help 
the Exchange to continue to incentivize higher levels of liquidity at a 
tighter spread while providing more stable and predictable costs to its 
Members. As stated above, the Exchange notes that it operates in a 
highly competitive market in which market participants can readily 
direct order flow to competing venues if the deem fee structures to be 
unreasonable or excessive.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \11\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 
thereunder.\12\ At any time within 60 days of the filing of the 
proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend 
such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is 
necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of 
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include 
File Number SR-BYX-2013-021 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy, 
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BYX-2013-021. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and 
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available 
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All 
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does 
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should 
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All 
submissions should refer to File Number SR-BYX-2013-021 and should be 
submitted on or before July 15, 2013.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-14965 Filed 6-21-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P