Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Fees Schedule, 36619-36620 [2013-14419]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 117 / Tuesday, June 18, 2013 / Notices
Participants to reference DTC rules
requirements of foreign entities which
are treated as non-U.S. entities for tax
purposes.
II. Discussion
[FR Doc. 2013–14418 Filed 6–17–13; 8:45 am]
Section 19(b)(2)(C) of the Act 12
directs the Commission to approve a
proposed rule change of a selfregulatory organization if it finds that
such proposed rule change is consistent
with the requirements of the Act and
rules and regulations thereunder
applicable to such organization. Section
17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act 13 requires the
rules of a clearing agency to be designed
to, among other things, promote the
prompt and accurate clearance and
settlement of securities transactions,
assure the safeguarding of securities and
funds which are in the custody or
control of the clearing agency or for
which it is responsible, and protect
investors and the public interest. The
Commission finds that DTC’s proposed
rule change is consistent with these
requirements because it is designed to
comply with FATCA while eliminating
uncertainty in funds settlement.
Specifically, based on DTC’s
representations, the Commission
understands that the proposed rule
change is designed codify DTC’s rules in
a way that will allow DTC to comply
with FACTA without developing and
maintaining a complex Gross Proceeds
Withholding system under FATCA and,
as a result, it will eliminate uncertainty
in funds settlement that DTC believes
will arise if DTC is subject to FATCA
Withholding.14
III. Conclusion
On the basis of the foregoing, the
Commission finds that the proposal is
consistent with the requirements of the
Act and in particular with the
requirements of Section 17A of the
Act 15 and the rules and regulations
thereunder.
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, that the
proposed rule change (SR–DTC–2013–
03) be, and it hereby is, approved.
12 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C).
U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
14 In approving this proposed rule change, the
Commission is mindful of the IRS’s jurisdiction
respecting FATCA. This Order does not interpret
FATCA. The Commission’s approval of the
proposed rule change in no way constitutes a
determination or finding by the Commission that
the proposed rule change complies with FATCA,
which is under the purview of the IRS.
15 In approving this proposed rule change, the
Commission has considered the proposed rule’s
impact on efficiency, competition, and capital
formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
13 12
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:52 Jun 17, 2013
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.16
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
Jkt 229001
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
36619
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–69747; File No. SR–CBOE–
2013–059]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change To Amend the Fees
Schedule
June 12, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on May 31,
2013, Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or
‘‘CBOE’’) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the
‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the
Fees Schedule. The text of the proposed
rule change is available on the
Exchange’s Web site (https://
www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/
CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at
the Exchange’s Office of the Secretary,
and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
16 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
PO 00000
Frm 00114
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The Exchange proposes to amend its
Fees Schedule. Currently, the Exchange
assesses an SPX Arbitrage Phone
Positions fee of $550 per month for each
clerk who is placed by a Market-Maker
on the perimeter of the SPX trading
crowd and provides futures trading
information to the Market-Maker in the
crowd and takes futures orders from the
Market-Maker in order to hedge the
Market-Maker’s SPX options positions
(for the purposes of this proposed rule
change, such activity (regardless of the
relevant options class) shall be referred
to as ‘‘Arbitrage’’). However, MarketMakers can have a clerk placed on the
perimeter of other trading crowds
engaging in Arbitrage. The Exchange
desires to assess this Arbitrage Phone
Positions fee regardless of the trading
crowd, and cease the Fees Schedule’s
limitation of it to the SPX trading
crowd. As such, the Exchange proposes
deleting ‘‘SPX’’ and merely stating that
the Arbitrage Phone Positions fee will
be $550 per month (thereby applying
such fee to all trading crowds).
TickerXpress (‘‘TX’’) is an optional
Exchange service that supplies market
data to Exchange Market-Makers trading
on the Hybrid Trading System.
Currently, the Exchange assesses two
TickerXpr#ess (TX) User Fees. The
$350-per-month Enhanced TX User Fee
is assessed to CBOE Market-Makers
desiring access to enhanced TX market
data. The $100-per-month TX Software
Fee is assessed to TX users for the
software used for the use and display of
market data. However, due to decreased
demand, the Exchange has determined
that it is no longer economically viable
to provide access to TickerXpress, and
therefore, effective June 1, 2013, will
cease doing so (Market-Makers will still
have other methods available to access
market data). As such, the Exchange
proposes to remove the TX User Fees
from the Fees Schedule.
The proposed changes are to take
effect June 1, 2013.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is consistent with the Act
and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to the Exchange
and, in particular, the requirements of
E:\FR\FM\18JNN1.SGM
18JNN1
36620
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 117 / Tuesday, June 18, 2013 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Section 6(b) of the Act.3 Specifically,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule
change is consistent with Section 6(b)(4)
of the Act,4 which requires that
Exchange rules provide for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
other charges among its Trading Permit
Holders and other persons using its
facilities. The Exchange believes it is
reasonable to assess the Arbitrage Phone
Positions fee of $550 for all clerks
engaged in Arbitrage because the
amount is the same as is being assessed
to SPX Market-Makers who are engaged
in that activity. The Exchange believes
this proposed change is equitable and
not unfairly discriminatory because it
will put the placement of all clerks for
Arbitrage on equal fee footing with
those who engage in Arbitrage for SPX.
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change to delete from the Fees
Schedule the TX fees is consistent with
the Section 6(b)(5) 5 requirements that
the rules of an exchange be designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with
respect to, and facilitation transactions
in securities, to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
Deleting from the Fees Schedule fees for
a service that is no longer offered by the
Exchange will prevent any possible
confusion that perhaps the service is
still available (and the fees still
applicable), and preventing confusion
removes impediments to and perfects
the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system,
and, in general, protects investors and
the public interest.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
CBOE does not believe that the
proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. CBOE does
not believe that the proposed rule
change to apply the Arbitrage Phone
Positions fee to all trading crowds (as
opposed to just SPX) will impose any
burden on intramarket competition that
is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act
because it will put the placement of all
clerks for Arbitrage on equal fee footing
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
5 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
with those who engage in such activity
for SPX. CBOE does not believe that the
proposed rule change to delete the TX
fees from the Fees Schedule will impose
any burden on intramarket competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act
because this deletion applies to all
CBOE market participants. CBOE does
not believe that the proposed rule
change will impose any burden on
intermarket competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act because the
proposed changes only apply to CBOE
and do not impact trading on other
exchanges.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor
received comments on the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 6 and paragraph (f) of Rule
19b–4 7 thereunder. At any time within
60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission will institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2013–059. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
offices of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–CBOE–
2013–059, and should be submitted on
or before July 9, 2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.8
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–14419 Filed 6–17–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–CBOE–2013–059 on the
subject line.
3 15
4 15
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:52 Jun 17, 2013
6 15
7 17
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f).
Frm 00115
Fmt 4703
8 17
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\18JNN1.SGM
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
18JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 117 (Tuesday, June 18, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36619-36620]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-14419]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-69747; File No. SR-CBOE-2013-059]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Fees Schedule
June 12, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on May 31, 2013, Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated (the
``Exchange'' or ``CBOE'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described
in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the Fees Schedule. The text of the
proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site (https://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at the Exchange's
Office of the Secretary, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its Fees Schedule. Currently, the
Exchange assesses an SPX Arbitrage Phone Positions fee of $550 per
month for each clerk who is placed by a Market-Maker on the perimeter
of the SPX trading crowd and provides futures trading information to
the Market-Maker in the crowd and takes futures orders from the Market-
Maker in order to hedge the Market-Maker's SPX options positions (for
the purposes of this proposed rule change, such activity (regardless of
the relevant options class) shall be referred to as ``Arbitrage'').
However, Market-Makers can have a clerk placed on the perimeter of
other trading crowds engaging in Arbitrage. The Exchange desires to
assess this Arbitrage Phone Positions fee regardless of the trading
crowd, and cease the Fees Schedule's limitation of it to the SPX
trading crowd. As such, the Exchange proposes deleting ``SPX'' and
merely stating that the Arbitrage Phone Positions fee will be $550 per
month (thereby applying such fee to all trading crowds).
TickerXpress (``TX'') is an optional Exchange service that supplies
market data to Exchange Market-Makers trading on the Hybrid Trading
System. Currently, the Exchange assesses two TickerXpress (TX)
User Fees. The $350-per-month Enhanced TX User Fee is assessed to CBOE
Market-Makers desiring access to enhanced TX market data. The $100-per-
month TX Software Fee is assessed to TX users for the software used for
the use and display of market data. However, due to decreased demand,
the Exchange has determined that it is no longer economically viable to
provide access to TickerXpress, and therefore, effective June 1, 2013,
will cease doing so (Market-Makers will still have other methods
available to access market data). As such, the Exchange proposes to
remove the TX User Fees from the Fees Schedule.
The proposed changes are to take effect June 1, 2013.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to the
Exchange and, in particular, the requirements of
[[Page 36620]]
Section 6(b) of the Act.\3\ Specifically, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\4\
which requires that Exchange rules provide for the equitable allocation
of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among its Trading Permit
Holders and other persons using its facilities. The Exchange believes
it is reasonable to assess the Arbitrage Phone Positions fee of $550
for all clerks engaged in Arbitrage because the amount is the same as
is being assessed to SPX Market-Makers who are engaged in that
activity. The Exchange believes this proposed change is equitable and
not unfairly discriminatory because it will put the placement of all
clerks for Arbitrage on equal fee footing with those who engage in
Arbitrage for SPX.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change to delete from the
Fees Schedule the TX fees is consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \5\
requirements that the rules of an exchange be designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination
with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing
information with respect to, and facilitation transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest. Deleting from the Fees
Schedule fees for a service that is no longer offered by the Exchange
will prevent any possible confusion that perhaps the service is still
available (and the fees still applicable), and preventing confusion
removes impediments to and perfects the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system, and, in general, protects
investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
CBOE does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. CBOE does not believe that the
proposed rule change to apply the Arbitrage Phone Positions fee to all
trading crowds (as opposed to just SPX) will impose any burden on
intramarket competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act because it will put the
placement of all clerks for Arbitrage on equal fee footing with those
who engage in such activity for SPX. CBOE does not believe that the
proposed rule change to delete the TX fees from the Fees Schedule will
impose any burden on intramarket competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act because this
deletion applies to all CBOE market participants. CBOE does not believe
that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on intermarket
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act because the proposed changes only apply to CBOE and
do not impact trading on other exchanges.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \6\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 \7\
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed
rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\7\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2013-059 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2013-059. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal offices of the Exchange.
All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission
does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You
should submit only information that you wish to make available
publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2013-059,
and should be submitted on or before July 9, 2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-14419 Filed 6-17-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P