Proposed Amendments to Rules of Practice and Procedure, 36446-36449 [2013-14004]
Download as PDF
36446
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 78, No. 117
Tuesday, June 18, 2013
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
19 CFR Parts 201 and 207
Proposed Amendments to Rules of
Practice and Procedure
International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The United States
International Trade Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) proposes to amend its
Rules of Practice and Procedure
concerning rules of general application,
and provisions concerning the conduct
of antidumping and countervailing duty
investigations and reviews. The
proposed amendments seek to increase
efficiency in processing and reviewing
documents filed with the Commission
and reduce Commission expenditures.
DATES: To be assured of consideration,
written comments must be received by
5:15 p.m. on August 19, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number MISC–013,
by any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Agency Web site: https://
edis.usitc.gov. Follow the instructions
for submitting comments on the Web
site.
• Mail: For paper submission. U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Room 112A, Washington,
DC 20436.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Room 112A, Washington,
DC 20436. From the hours of 8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number (MISC–013), along with
a cover letter stating the nature of the
commenter’s interest in the proposed
rulemaking. All comments received will
be posted without change to https://
edis.usitc.gov, including any personal
information provided. For paper copies,
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:16 Jun 17, 2013
Jkt 229001
a signed original and 14 copies of each
set of comments should be submitted to
Lisa R. Barton, Acting Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Room 112A, Washington,
DC 20436. Docket: For access to the
docket to read background documents
or comments received, go to https://
edis.usitc.gov and/or the U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Room 112A, Washington,
DC 20436.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa
R. Barton, Acting Secretary, telephone
(202) 205–2000, or David Goldfine,
Attorney-Advisor, Office of the General
Counsel, telephone (202) 708–5452,
United States International Trade
Commission. Hearing-impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal at (202) 205–1810. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
preamble below is designed to assist
readers in understanding these
proposed amendments to the
Commission’s Rules. This preamble
provides background information, a
regulatory analysis of the proposed
amendments, and a section-by-section
explanation of the proposed
amendments. The Commission
encourages members of the public to
comment on the proposed amendments
as well as on whether the language of
the proposed amendments is
sufficiently clear for users to
understand.
Background
Section 335 of the Tariff Act of 1930
(19 U.S.C. 1335) authorizes the
Commission to adopt such reasonable
procedures, rules, and regulations as it
deems necessary to carry out its
functions and duties. This rulemaking
seeks to improve provisions of the
Commission’s existing Rules of Practice
and Procedure. The Commission
proposes amendments to its rules
covering proceedings such as
investigations and reviews conducted
under title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930,
and sections 202, 406, 421, 422 of the
Trade Act of 1974 and sections 302 and
312 of the North American Free Trade
Agreement Implementation Act (19
U.S.C. 2252, 2436, 2451, 2451a, 3352,
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
3372). The Commission invites the
public to comment on all of these
proposed rules amendments. In any
comments, please consider addressing
whether the language of the proposed
amendments is sufficiently clear for
users to understand. In addition please
consider addressing how the proposed
rules amendments could be improved,
and/or offer specific constructive
alternatives where appropriate.
Consistent with its ordinary practice,
the Commission is issuing these
proposed amendments in accordance
with provisions of section 553 of the
Administrative Procedure Act (‘‘APA’’)
(5 U.S.C. 553), although such provisions
are not mandatory with respect to this
rulemaking. The APA procedure entails
the following steps: (1) Publication of a
notice of proposed rulemaking; (2)
solicitation of public comments on the
proposed amendments; (3) Commission
review of public comments on the
proposed amendments; and (4)
publication of final amendments at least
thirty days prior to their effective date.
(1) The Commission proposes to
require that all paper copies of
electronic submissions exceeding fifty
(50) pages in length must be securely
bound and must have a divider page
and an identifying tab preceding each
exhibit and/or attachment. The divider
page and/or tab must be labeled with a
letter or number that corresponds to a
more fully descriptive index. Examples
of secure binding include spiral
binding, velo binding, and stapling for
documents close to the 50-page
threshold. These new requirements,
however, may be waived upon a
showing of good cause.
During the course of many
proceedings, in particular Title VII
investigations and reviews, the
Commission receives a significant
number of large submissions with
associated exhibits and attachments.
These amendments will facilitate
Commission review of lengthy
submissions and will allow the
Commission more readily to refer to
discrete portions of these documents.
Petitions, which are not electronic
filings, will also be subject to these
requirements, with the exception that
one copy of the petition must be filed
unbound to facilitate its scanning into
the Commission’s Electronic Document
Information System.
E:\FR\FM\18JNP1.SGM
18JNP1
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 117 / Tuesday, June 18, 2013 / Proposed Rules
(2) In addition to current information
requirements, the Commission proposes
to require that petitioners provide the
email address, street address, city, state,
and 5-digit zip code for each purchaser/
contact with respect to each lost sales or
lost revenue allegation. Requiring
petitioners to provide this specific
information should facilitate the
Commission’s ability to contact
purchasers concerning these allegations.
Under current practice, the Commission
collects this information from nonpetitioning U.S. producers in its
questionnaires. Requiring petitioners to
provide the same information in the
petition as non-petitioning U.S.
producers are required to provide in
questionnaires should allow for the
orderly collection and verification of
lost sales and lost revenue data by the
agency.
(3) The Commission proposes to
require that petitioners must file any
lost sales or revenue allegation(s)
identified in the petition via a separate
electronic data entry process in a
manner to be specified in the
Commission’s Handbook on Filing
Procedures. The Commission is
contemplating various technology
options and is soliciting comment prior
to developing the specific filing
instructions.
Commission staff members currently
use facsimile as the primary method for
contacting purchasers to verify lost sales
and lost revenue allegations. Two
significant problems exist with the use
of facsimiles for this purpose. First, the
process of sending facsimiles to
purchasers and verifying their receipt is
time-consuming and inefficient.
Additionally, obtaining responses from
purchasers via facsimile is becoming
increasingly difficult as facsimile
machines are more often perceived as a
‘‘legacy’’ technology that has been
superseded by electronic mail or other
electronic communication technologies.
Current options under consideration,
for which the Commission is seeking
comment, include (1) submission of lost
sales and lost revenue data in an
electronic spreadsheet document
provided by the Commission or (2)
direct entry of all allegations into a
secure Web-based portal. Additional
options may be contemplated based on
information received from public
comments or as a result of evolving
technological capabilities. The
Commission intends to develop
additional details to be included in the
Commission’s Handbook on Filing
Procedures after receiving and
considering comments on the proposed
changes, and once the process and
system are finalized.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:16 Jun 17, 2013
Jkt 229001
Requiring that all petitioners file lost
sales and revenue allegations via a
separate electronic data entry process
will facilitate the use of email as a
vehicle for contacting purchasers. Email
communication will only be used to
direct purchasers to a secure Web site
where they can access the lost sales
and/or lost revenue allegations specific
to each purchaser, and respond to the
allegations. This should provide faster
and more efficient dissemination and
verification of lost sales and lost
revenue information while maintaining
current levels of security. Requiring
submission of the data via this separate
electronic data entry process should not
present an undue burden on petitioners
since these data are already required to
be in the petition.
(4) The Commission proposes to
require petitioners to provide email
addresses for all U.S. producers and
U.S. importers identified in the petition.
The current rules specify that
petitioners are required to provide
contact information for U.S. producers
and U.S. importers, including street
addresses, phone numbers, and contact
person(s). Requiring petitioners also to
provide email addresses for U.S.
producers and U.S. importers should
facilitate the process of contacting these
firms, thereby streamlining agency
proceedings.
(5) The Commission proposes that all
requests for collecting new information
should be presented at the draft
questionnaire stage in final phase
investigations. The intent of the current
provision in Commission rule 207.20
was to direct parties to make
information requests, particularly
concerning domestic like product,
domestic industry, and cumulation
issues, in questionnaire comments
rather than later in the investigation. 61
FR 37818, 37826 (July 22, 1996).
Notwithstanding this, the Commission
has found that parties occasionally
include in briefs information requests
that could have been made in
questionnaire comments. Commission
staff does not have sufficient time or
resources during the latter stage of final
phase investigations to embark upon
major data collection efforts.
Consequently, the current information
collection provisions of section
207.63(b) concerning five-year reviews
will be incorporated in section
207.20(b). This provision requires that
all requests for collecting new
information should be presented in
comments on draft questionnaires, and
states that the Commission will
disregard subsequent requests for
additional information absent a showing
of compelling need and that the
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
36447
information could not have been
requested in the comments on draft
questionnaires. These provisions
pertaining to new information requests
have worked effectively in five-year
reviews and the Commission believes
their adoption in final phase
investigations will also be effective.
(6) The Commission proposes to
extend the deadlines currently specified
in the rule for instituting and
completing changed circumstances
reviews. The statutory provisions in 19
U.S.C. 1675(b)(1) and (b)(2) do not
provide any deadline for the
Commission to initiate or complete a
changed circumstance review.
Moreover, in prior changed
circumstance reviews under 19 U.S.C.
1675(b), the Commission has extended
the deadlines specified in the rule in a
not insubstantial number of instances in
order to analyze extensive record data or
to collect additional data. The deadline
for institution is being extended in order
to provide the Commission with
additional time to analyze issues
pertaining to complex or contested
requests. Extension will also provide the
agency with greater scheduling
flexibility, which is particularly needed
because the Commission’s antidumping
and countervailing duty docket is larger
now than when the rule was first
promulgated. However, the Commission
intends to make its decisions with
respect to institution and completion of
such reviews expeditiously.
Regulatory Analysis of Proposed
Amendments to the Commission’s Rules
The Commission has determined that
the final rules do not meet the criteria
described in section 3(f) of Executive
Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, Oct. 4, 1993)
and thus do not constitute a significant
regulatory action for purposes of the
Executive Order.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) is inapplicable to this
rulemaking because it is not one for
which a notice of final rulemaking is
required under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) or any
other statute. Although the Commission
has chosen to publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking, these proposed
regulations are ‘‘agency rules of
procedure and practice,’’ and thus are
exempt from the notice requirement
imposed by 5 U.S.C. 553(b).
These proposed rules do not contain
federalism implications warranting the
preparation of a federalism summary
impact statement pursuant to Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, Aug. 4,
1999).
No actions are necessary under the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) because the
E:\FR\FM\18JNP1.SGM
18JNP1
36448
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 117 / Tuesday, June 18, 2013 / Proposed Rules
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
proposed rules will not result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100,000,000 or more
in any one year, and will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments.
The proposed rules are not major
rules as defined by section 804 of the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (5 U.S.C. 801 et
seq.). Moreover, they are exempt from
the reporting requirements of the
Contract With America Advancement
Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121) because
they concern rules of agency
organization, procedure, or practice that
do not substantially affect the rights or
obligations of non-agency parties.
The amendments are not subject to
section 3504(h) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.),
because the amendments would impose
no new collection of information under
the statute.
be presented at the draft questionnaire
stage in final phase investigations
unless there is a compelling showing
that a later request is justified.
Section 207.45 addresses the
Commission’s procedures for initiating
and conducting section 751(b) changed
circumstances reviews. The
Commission proposes to extend the
deadlines specified in the rule.
document may result in the rejection of
the document as improperly filed.
*
*
*
*
*
List of Subjects in 19 CFR Parts 201 and
207
Administrative practice and
procedure, Business and industry,
Customs duties and inspection, Imports,
Investigations.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the United States
International Trade Commission
proposes to amend 19 CFR parts 201
and 207 as follows:
■
Section-by-Section Analysis
Section 201.8 generally provides the
requirements for filing documents with
the Commission. The Commission
proposes to amend paragraph (d) of
§ 201.8 to require that all paper copies
of electronic submissions exceeding
fifty (50) pages in length must be
securely bound and must have a divider
page and an identifying tab preceding
each exhibit and/or attachment. The
divider page and/or tab must be labeled
with a letter or number that corresponds
to a more fully descriptive index.
Section 207.10 addresses petition
filings with the Commission. The
Commission proposes to require
petitioners to file one unbound copy of
petitions.
Section 207.11 addresses the contents
of petitions in Title VII proceedings.
The Commission proposes to revise the
language of § 207.11(b)(2)(ii) and (iii) to
require that petitioners provide email
addresses for all U.S. producers and
U.S. importers identified in the petition.
The Commission further proposes to
revise the language of § 207.10(b)(2)(v)
to specify that petitioners must submit
all lost sales and lost revenue
allegations in electronic format. The
Commission also proposes to revise the
language of § 207.10(b)(2)(v) to specify
that petitioners also must provide the
email address(es), street address(es),
city, state, and 5-digit zip code for each
purchaser/contact with respect to all
lost sales and lost revenue allegations.
Section 207.20 addresses the
Commission’s investigative activities in
final phase investigations. The
Commission proposes that all requests
for collecting new information should
■
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:16 Jun 17, 2013
Jkt 229001
PART 201—RULES OF GENERAL
APPLICATION
1. The authority citation for part 201
continues to read as follows:
Authority: Sec. 335 of the Tariff Act of
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1335), and sec. 603 of the
Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2482), unless
otherwise noted.
Subpart B—Initiation and Conduct of
Investigations
2. Amend § 201.8 by revising
paragraph (d)(1) to read as follows:
■
§ 201.8
Filing of documents.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) Except as provided in paragraphs
(d)(2) through (6) and (f) of this section,
all documents filed with the
Commission shall be filed
electronically. Completion of filing
requires the submission of paper copies
by 12 noon, eastern time, on the next
business day. A paper copy provided for
in this section must be a true copy of the
electronic version of the document, i.e.,
a copy that is identical in all possible
respects. All paper copies of electronic
submissions exceeding fifty (50) pages
in length must be securely bound
(excluding paper clips, binder clips, or
rubber bands) and must have a divider
page and an identifying tab preceding
each exhibit and/or attachment. The
divider page and/or tab must be labeled
with a letter or number that corresponds
to a more fully descriptive index. All
filings shall comply with the procedures
set forth in the Commission’s Electronic
Document Information System Web site
at https://edis.usitc.gov. Failure to
comply with the requirements of this
chapter and the Handbook on Filing
Procedures that apply to the filing of a
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
PART 207—INVESTIGATIONS OF
WHETHER INJURY TO DOMESTIC
INDUSTRIES RESULTS FROM
IMPORTS SOLD AT LESS THAN FAIR
VALUE OR FROM SUBSIDIZED
EXPORTS TO THE UNITED STATES
3. The authority citation for part 207
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 1336, 1671–1677n,
2482, 3513.
4. Amend § 207.10 by revising
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
■
§ 207.10 Filing of petition with the
Commission.
(a) Filing of the petition. Any
interested party who files a petition
with the administering authority
pursuant to section 702(b) or section
732(b) of the Act in a case in which a
Commission determination under title
VII of the Act is required, shall file
copies of the petition and all exhibits,
appendices, and attachments thereto,
pursuant to § 201.8 of this chapter, with
the Secretary on the same day the
petition is filed with the administering
authority. A paper original and eight (8)
true paper copies of a petition shall be
filed. One copy of all exhibits,
appendices, and attachments to the
petition shall be filed in electronic form
on CD–ROM, DVD, or other portable
electronic format approved by the
Secretary. Petitioners also must file one
unbound copy of the petition (although
the unbound copy of the petition may
be stapled or held together by means of
a clip). If the petition complies with the
provisions of § 207.11, it shall be
deemed to be properly filed on the date
on which the requisite number of copies
of the petition is received by the
Secretary, provided that, if the petition
is filed with the Secretary after 12:00
noon, eastern time, the petition shall be
deemed filed on the next business day.
Notwithstanding § 207.11 of this
chapter, a petitioner need not file an
entry of appearance in the investigation
instituted upon the filing of its petition,
which shall be deemed an entry of
appearance.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5. Amend § 207.11 by revising
paragraphs (b)(2)(ii), (iii), and (v) to read
as follows:
§ 207.11
Contents of petition.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) A listing of all U.S. producers of
the proposed domestic like product(s),
E:\FR\FM\18JNP1.SGM
18JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 117 / Tuesday, June 18, 2013 / Proposed Rules
including a street address, phone
number, and contact person(s) with
email address(es) for each producer;
(iii) A listing of all U.S. importers of
the subject merchandise, including
street addresses, email addresses, and
phone numbers for each importer.
*
*
*
*
*
(v) A listing of all sales or revenue lost
by each petitioning firm by reason of the
subject merchandise during the three
years preceding filing of the petition.
For each named purchaser, petitioners
must provide the email address of the
specific contact person, street address,
city, state, and 5-digit zip code with
respect to each lost sales or lost revenue
allegation. Petitioners must certify that
all lost sales or lost revenue allegations
identified in the petition will also be
submitted electronically in the manner
specified in the Commission’s
Handbook on Filing Procedures.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 6. Amend § 207.20 by revising
paragraph (b) to read as follows:
§ 207.20 Investigative activity following
preliminary determination.
*
*
*
*
(b) The Director shall circulate draft
questionnaires for the final phase of an
investigation to parties to the
investigation for comment. Any party
desiring to comment on draft
questionnaires shall submit such
comments in writing to the Commission
within a time specified by the Director.
All requests for collecting new
information shall be presented at this
time. The Commission will disregard
subsequent requests for collection of
new information absent a showing that
there is a compelling need for the
information and that the information
could not have been requested in the
comments on the draft questionnaires.
■ 7. Amend § 207.45 by revising
paragraph (c) to read as follows:
§ 207.45 Investigation to review
outstanding determination.
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
(c) Institution of an investigation.
Within forty-five (45) days after the
close of the period for public comments
following publication of the receipt of a
request, the Commission shall
determine whether the request shows
changed circumstances sufficient to
warrant a review and, if so, shall
institute a review investigation. The
Commission may also institute a review
investigation on its own initiative. The
review investigation shall be instituted
by notice published in the Federal
Register and shall be completed within
one hundred eighty (180) days of the
date of such publication. If the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:16 Jun 17, 2013
Jkt 229001
By order of the Commission.
Issued: June 7, 2013.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2013–14004 Filed 6–17–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration on Aging
45 CFR Parts 1321 and 1327
RIN 0985–AA08
State Long-Term Care Ombudsman
Program
Administration on Aging,
Administration for Community Living,
HHS.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
*
*
Commission determines that a request
does not show changed circumstances
sufficient to warrant a review, the
request shall be dismissed and a notice
of the dismissal published in the
Federal Register stating the reasons
therefor.
*
*
*
*
*
The Administration on Aging
(AoA) of the Administration for
Community Living (ACL) within the
Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) is issuing a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking, with request for
comments, to implement provisions of
the Older Americans Act, the State
Long-Term Care Ombudsman program.
This proposed rule replaces AoA’s 1994
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.
Since 1992, the functions of this
program have been delineated in the
Older Americans Act; however,
regulations have not been promulgated
for any Title VII program. In the absence
of regulatory guidance, there has been
significant variation in the
interpretation and implementation of
these provisions among States. Recent
inquiries from States and an AoA
compliance review in one State have
highlighted the difficulty of determining
State compliance in carrying out the
Long-Term Care Ombudsman program
functions. This rulemaking provides the
first regulatory guidance for States’
Long-Term Care Ombudsman programs
to provide clarity about implementation.
HHS estimates that a number of states
may need to update their statutes,
regulations, policies and/or practices in
order to operate the program consistent
with federal law and this proposed
regulation. The effective date of the rule
is anticipated to be one year after
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
36449
publication of any final rule to allow
States appropriate time for such
changes, if needed. AoA anticipates
little or no financial impact on the
providers of long-term care ombudsman
services, the consumers served by the
program, or long-term care providers
through implementation of the proposed
rules.
AoA believes that consumers
(particularly residents of long-term care
facilities) and long-term care providers
will benefit from the implementation of
these proposed rules. Consumers and
other complainants across the country
will receive services from the LongTerm Care Ombudsman program with
less variation in the quality, efficiency,
and consistency of service delivery.
Long-term care ombudsmen and
States will also benefit from the
implementation of these proposed rules
in the establishment and operation of
the Long-Term Care Ombudsman
program at the State and local levels.
For years, States and long-term care
ombudsmen at every level have reported
to AoA that they have found some
provisions of the Act confusing to
implement. The proposed rule seeks to
provide the clarity that program
stakeholders have requested.
DATES: To be assured consideration,
comments must be received at one of
the addresses provided below, no later
than 5 p.m. on August 19, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Because of staff and
resource limitations, we cannot accept
comments by facsimile (FAX)
transmission. You may submit
comments in one of four ways (please
choose only one of the ways listed):
1. Electronically. You may submit
electronic comments on this regulation
to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the instructions under the ‘‘More Search
Options’’ tab.
2. By regular mail. You may mail
written comments to the following
address: Administration for Community
Living, Administration on Aging, US
Department of Health and Human
Services, Attention: Becky Kurtz,
Washington, DC 20201.
Please allow sufficient time for mailed
comments to be received before the
close of the comment period.
3. By express or overnight mail. You
may send written comments to the
following address: Administration for
Community Living, Administration on
Aging, US Department of Health and
Human Services, Attention: Becky
Kurtz, 1 Massachusetts Avenue NW.,
5th Floor, Washington, DC 20001.
4. By hand or courier. If you prefer,
you may deliver (by hand or courier)
your written comments before the close
E:\FR\FM\18JNP1.SGM
18JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 117 (Tuesday, June 18, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 36446-36449]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-14004]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 117 / Tuesday, June 18, 2013 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 36446]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
19 CFR Parts 201 and 207
Proposed Amendments to Rules of Practice and Procedure
AGENCY: International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The United States International Trade Commission
(``Commission'') proposes to amend its Rules of Practice and Procedure
concerning rules of general application, and provisions concerning the
conduct of antidumping and countervailing duty investigations and
reviews. The proposed amendments seek to increase efficiency in
processing and reviewing documents filed with the Commission and reduce
Commission expenditures.
DATES: To be assured of consideration, written comments must be
received by 5:15 p.m. on August 19, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number MISC-
013, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Agency Web site: https://edis.usitc.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments on the Web site.
Mail: For paper submission. U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room 112A, Washington, DC 20436.
Hand Delivery/Courier: U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room 112A, Washington, DC 20436. From the
hours of 8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number (MISC-013), along with a cover letter stating the
nature of the commenter's interest in the proposed rulemaking. All
comments received will be posted without change to https://edis.usitc.gov, including any personal information provided. For paper
copies, a signed original and 14 copies of each set of comments should
be submitted to Lisa R. Barton, Acting Secretary, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room 112A, Washington, DC 20436.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://edis.usitc.gov and/or the U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room 112A,
Washington, DC 20436.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa R. Barton, Acting Secretary,
telephone (202) 205-2000, or David Goldfine, Attorney-Advisor, Office
of the General Counsel, telephone (202) 708-5452, United States
International Trade Commission. Hearing-impaired individuals are
advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting
the Commission's TDD terminal at (202) 205-1810. General information
concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The preamble below is designed to assist
readers in understanding these proposed amendments to the Commission's
Rules. This preamble provides background information, a regulatory
analysis of the proposed amendments, and a section-by-section
explanation of the proposed amendments. The Commission encourages
members of the public to comment on the proposed amendments as well as
on whether the language of the proposed amendments is sufficiently
clear for users to understand.
Background
Section 335 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1335) authorizes
the Commission to adopt such reasonable procedures, rules, and
regulations as it deems necessary to carry out its functions and
duties. This rulemaking seeks to improve provisions of the Commission's
existing Rules of Practice and Procedure. The Commission proposes
amendments to its rules covering proceedings such as investigations and
reviews conducted under title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930, and
sections 202, 406, 421, 422 of the Trade Act of 1974 and sections 302
and 312 of the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act
(19 U.S.C. 2252, 2436, 2451, 2451a, 3352, 3372). The Commission invites
the public to comment on all of these proposed rules amendments. In any
comments, please consider addressing whether the language of the
proposed amendments is sufficiently clear for users to understand. In
addition please consider addressing how the proposed rules amendments
could be improved, and/or offer specific constructive alternatives
where appropriate.
Consistent with its ordinary practice, the Commission is issuing
these proposed amendments in accordance with provisions of section 553
of the Administrative Procedure Act (``APA'') (5 U.S.C. 553), although
such provisions are not mandatory with respect to this rulemaking. The
APA procedure entails the following steps: (1) Publication of a notice
of proposed rulemaking; (2) solicitation of public comments on the
proposed amendments; (3) Commission review of public comments on the
proposed amendments; and (4) publication of final amendments at least
thirty days prior to their effective date.
(1) The Commission proposes to require that all paper copies of
electronic submissions exceeding fifty (50) pages in length must be
securely bound and must have a divider page and an identifying tab
preceding each exhibit and/or attachment. The divider page and/or tab
must be labeled with a letter or number that corresponds to a more
fully descriptive index. Examples of secure binding include spiral
binding, velo binding, and stapling for documents close to the 50-page
threshold. These new requirements, however, may be waived upon a
showing of good cause.
During the course of many proceedings, in particular Title VII
investigations and reviews, the Commission receives a significant
number of large submissions with associated exhibits and attachments.
These amendments will facilitate Commission review of lengthy
submissions and will allow the Commission more readily to refer to
discrete portions of these documents. Petitions, which are not
electronic filings, will also be subject to these requirements, with
the exception that one copy of the petition must be filed unbound to
facilitate its scanning into the Commission's Electronic Document
Information System.
[[Page 36447]]
(2) In addition to current information requirements, the Commission
proposes to require that petitioners provide the email address, street
address, city, state, and 5-digit zip code for each purchaser/contact
with respect to each lost sales or lost revenue allegation. Requiring
petitioners to provide this specific information should facilitate the
Commission's ability to contact purchasers concerning these
allegations. Under current practice, the Commission collects this
information from non-petitioning U.S. producers in its questionnaires.
Requiring petitioners to provide the same information in the petition
as non-petitioning U.S. producers are required to provide in
questionnaires should allow for the orderly collection and verification
of lost sales and lost revenue data by the agency.
(3) The Commission proposes to require that petitioners must file
any lost sales or revenue allegation(s) identified in the petition via
a separate electronic data entry process in a manner to be specified in
the Commission's Handbook on Filing Procedures. The Commission is
contemplating various technology options and is soliciting comment
prior to developing the specific filing instructions.
Commission staff members currently use facsimile as the primary
method for contacting purchasers to verify lost sales and lost revenue
allegations. Two significant problems exist with the use of facsimiles
for this purpose. First, the process of sending facsimiles to
purchasers and verifying their receipt is time-consuming and
inefficient. Additionally, obtaining responses from purchasers via
facsimile is becoming increasingly difficult as facsimile machines are
more often perceived as a ``legacy'' technology that has been
superseded by electronic mail or other electronic communication
technologies.
Current options under consideration, for which the Commission is
seeking comment, include (1) submission of lost sales and lost revenue
data in an electronic spreadsheet document provided by the Commission
or (2) direct entry of all allegations into a secure Web-based portal.
Additional options may be contemplated based on information received
from public comments or as a result of evolving technological
capabilities. The Commission intends to develop additional details to
be included in the Commission's Handbook on Filing Procedures after
receiving and considering comments on the proposed changes, and once
the process and system are finalized.
Requiring that all petitioners file lost sales and revenue
allegations via a separate electronic data entry process will
facilitate the use of email as a vehicle for contacting purchasers.
Email communication will only be used to direct purchasers to a secure
Web site where they can access the lost sales and/or lost revenue
allegations specific to each purchaser, and respond to the allegations.
This should provide faster and more efficient dissemination and
verification of lost sales and lost revenue information while
maintaining current levels of security. Requiring submission of the
data via this separate electronic data entry process should not present
an undue burden on petitioners since these data are already required to
be in the petition.
(4) The Commission proposes to require petitioners to provide email
addresses for all U.S. producers and U.S. importers identified in the
petition. The current rules specify that petitioners are required to
provide contact information for U.S. producers and U.S. importers,
including street addresses, phone numbers, and contact person(s).
Requiring petitioners also to provide email addresses for U.S.
producers and U.S. importers should facilitate the process of
contacting these firms, thereby streamlining agency proceedings.
(5) The Commission proposes that all requests for collecting new
information should be presented at the draft questionnaire stage in
final phase investigations. The intent of the current provision in
Commission rule 207.20 was to direct parties to make information
requests, particularly concerning domestic like product, domestic
industry, and cumulation issues, in questionnaire comments rather than
later in the investigation. 61 FR 37818, 37826 (July 22, 1996).
Notwithstanding this, the Commission has found that parties
occasionally include in briefs information requests that could have
been made in questionnaire comments. Commission staff does not have
sufficient time or resources during the latter stage of final phase
investigations to embark upon major data collection efforts.
Consequently, the current information collection provisions of
section 207.63(b) concerning five-year reviews will be incorporated in
section 207.20(b). This provision requires that all requests for
collecting new information should be presented in comments on draft
questionnaires, and states that the Commission will disregard
subsequent requests for additional information absent a showing of
compelling need and that the information could not have been requested
in the comments on draft questionnaires. These provisions pertaining to
new information requests have worked effectively in five-year reviews
and the Commission believes their adoption in final phase
investigations will also be effective.
(6) The Commission proposes to extend the deadlines currently
specified in the rule for instituting and completing changed
circumstances reviews. The statutory provisions in 19 U.S.C. 1675(b)(1)
and (b)(2) do not provide any deadline for the Commission to initiate
or complete a changed circumstance review. Moreover, in prior changed
circumstance reviews under 19 U.S.C. 1675(b), the Commission has
extended the deadlines specified in the rule in a not insubstantial
number of instances in order to analyze extensive record data or to
collect additional data. The deadline for institution is being extended
in order to provide the Commission with additional time to analyze
issues pertaining to complex or contested requests. Extension will also
provide the agency with greater scheduling flexibility, which is
particularly needed because the Commission's antidumping and
countervailing duty docket is larger now than when the rule was first
promulgated. However, the Commission intends to make its decisions with
respect to institution and completion of such reviews expeditiously.
Regulatory Analysis of Proposed Amendments to the Commission's Rules
The Commission has determined that the final rules do not meet the
criteria described in section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, Oct. 4, 1993) and thus do not constitute a significant
regulatory action for purposes of the Executive Order.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) is
inapplicable to this rulemaking because it is not one for which a
notice of final rulemaking is required under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) or any
other statute. Although the Commission has chosen to publish a notice
of proposed rulemaking, these proposed regulations are ``agency rules
of procedure and practice,'' and thus are exempt from the notice
requirement imposed by 5 U.S.C. 553(b).
These proposed rules do not contain federalism implications
warranting the preparation of a federalism summary impact statement
pursuant to Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, Aug. 4, 1999).
No actions are necessary under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995 (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) because the
[[Page 36448]]
proposed rules will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year, and will not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments.
The proposed rules are not major rules as defined by section 804 of
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (5
U.S.C. 801 et seq.). Moreover, they are exempt from the reporting
requirements of the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996 (Pub.
L. 104-121) because they concern rules of agency organization,
procedure, or practice that do not substantially affect the rights or
obligations of non-agency parties.
The amendments are not subject to section 3504(h) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), because the amendments would
impose no new collection of information under the statute.
Section-by-Section Analysis
Section 201.8 generally provides the requirements for filing
documents with the Commission. The Commission proposes to amend
paragraph (d) of Sec. 201.8 to require that all paper copies of
electronic submissions exceeding fifty (50) pages in length must be
securely bound and must have a divider page and an identifying tab
preceding each exhibit and/or attachment. The divider page and/or tab
must be labeled with a letter or number that corresponds to a more
fully descriptive index.
Section 207.10 addresses petition filings with the Commission. The
Commission proposes to require petitioners to file one unbound copy of
petitions.
Section 207.11 addresses the contents of petitions in Title VII
proceedings. The Commission proposes to revise the language of Sec.
207.11(b)(2)(ii) and (iii) to require that petitioners provide email
addresses for all U.S. producers and U.S. importers identified in the
petition. The Commission further proposes to revise the language of
Sec. 207.10(b)(2)(v) to specify that petitioners must submit all lost
sales and lost revenue allegations in electronic format. The Commission
also proposes to revise the language of Sec. 207.10(b)(2)(v) to
specify that petitioners also must provide the email address(es),
street address(es), city, state, and 5-digit zip code for each
purchaser/contact with respect to all lost sales and lost revenue
allegations.
Section 207.20 addresses the Commission's investigative activities
in final phase investigations. The Commission proposes that all
requests for collecting new information should be presented at the
draft questionnaire stage in final phase investigations unless there is
a compelling showing that a later request is justified.
Section 207.45 addresses the Commission's procedures for initiating
and conducting section 751(b) changed circumstances reviews. The
Commission proposes to extend the deadlines specified in the rule.
List of Subjects in 19 CFR Parts 201 and 207
Administrative practice and procedure, Business and industry,
Customs duties and inspection, Imports, Investigations.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the United States
International Trade Commission proposes to amend 19 CFR parts 201 and
207 as follows:
PART 201--RULES OF GENERAL APPLICATION
0
1. The authority citation for part 201 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Sec. 335 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1335),
and sec. 603 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2482), unless
otherwise noted.
Subpart B--Initiation and Conduct of Investigations
0
2. Amend Sec. 201.8 by revising paragraph (d)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 201.8 Filing of documents.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(1) Except as provided in paragraphs (d)(2) through (6) and (f) of
this section, all documents filed with the Commission shall be filed
electronically. Completion of filing requires the submission of paper
copies by 12 noon, eastern time, on the next business day. A paper copy
provided for in this section must be a true copy of the electronic
version of the document, i.e., a copy that is identical in all possible
respects. All paper copies of electronic submissions exceeding fifty
(50) pages in length must be securely bound (excluding paper clips,
binder clips, or rubber bands) and must have a divider page and an
identifying tab preceding each exhibit and/or attachment. The divider
page and/or tab must be labeled with a letter or number that
corresponds to a more fully descriptive index. All filings shall comply
with the procedures set forth in the Commission's Electronic Document
Information System Web site at https://edis.usitc.gov. Failure to
comply with the requirements of this chapter and the Handbook on Filing
Procedures that apply to the filing of a document may result in the
rejection of the document as improperly filed.
* * * * *
PART 207--INVESTIGATIONS OF WHETHER INJURY TO DOMESTIC INDUSTRIES
RESULTS FROM IMPORTS SOLD AT LESS THAN FAIR VALUE OR FROM
SUBSIDIZED EXPORTS TO THE UNITED STATES
0
3. The authority citation for part 207 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 1336, 1671-1677n, 2482, 3513.
0
4. Amend Sec. 207.10 by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 207.10 Filing of petition with the Commission.
(a) Filing of the petition. Any interested party who files a
petition with the administering authority pursuant to section 702(b) or
section 732(b) of the Act in a case in which a Commission determination
under title VII of the Act is required, shall file copies of the
petition and all exhibits, appendices, and attachments thereto,
pursuant to Sec. 201.8 of this chapter, with the Secretary on the same
day the petition is filed with the administering authority. A paper
original and eight (8) true paper copies of a petition shall be filed.
One copy of all exhibits, appendices, and attachments to the petition
shall be filed in electronic form on CD-ROM, DVD, or other portable
electronic format approved by the Secretary. Petitioners also must file
one unbound copy of the petition (although the unbound copy of the
petition may be stapled or held together by means of a clip). If the
petition complies with the provisions of Sec. 207.11, it shall be
deemed to be properly filed on the date on which the requisite number
of copies of the petition is received by the Secretary, provided that,
if the petition is filed with the Secretary after 12:00 noon, eastern
time, the petition shall be deemed filed on the next business day.
Notwithstanding Sec. 207.11 of this chapter, a petitioner need not
file an entry of appearance in the investigation instituted upon the
filing of its petition, which shall be deemed an entry of appearance.
* * * * *
0
5. Amend Sec. 207.11 by revising paragraphs (b)(2)(ii), (iii), and (v)
to read as follows:
Sec. 207.11 Contents of petition.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) A listing of all U.S. producers of the proposed domestic like
product(s),
[[Page 36449]]
including a street address, phone number, and contact person(s) with
email address(es) for each producer;
(iii) A listing of all U.S. importers of the subject merchandise,
including street addresses, email addresses, and phone numbers for each
importer.
* * * * *
(v) A listing of all sales or revenue lost by each petitioning firm
by reason of the subject merchandise during the three years preceding
filing of the petition. For each named purchaser, petitioners must
provide the email address of the specific contact person, street
address, city, state, and 5-digit zip code with respect to each lost
sales or lost revenue allegation. Petitioners must certify that all
lost sales or lost revenue allegations identified in the petition will
also be submitted electronically in the manner specified in the
Commission's Handbook on Filing Procedures.
* * * * *
0
6. Amend Sec. 207.20 by revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 207.20 Investigative activity following preliminary
determination.
* * * * *
(b) The Director shall circulate draft questionnaires for the final
phase of an investigation to parties to the investigation for comment.
Any party desiring to comment on draft questionnaires shall submit such
comments in writing to the Commission within a time specified by the
Director. All requests for collecting new information shall be
presented at this time. The Commission will disregard subsequent
requests for collection of new information absent a showing that there
is a compelling need for the information and that the information could
not have been requested in the comments on the draft questionnaires.
0
7. Amend Sec. 207.45 by revising paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 207.45 Investigation to review outstanding determination.
* * * * *
(c) Institution of an investigation. Within forty-five (45) days
after the close of the period for public comments following publication
of the receipt of a request, the Commission shall determine whether the
request shows changed circumstances sufficient to warrant a review and,
if so, shall institute a review investigation. The Commission may also
institute a review investigation on its own initiative. The review
investigation shall be instituted by notice published in the Federal
Register and shall be completed within one hundred eighty (180) days of
the date of such publication. If the Commission determines that a
request does not show changed circumstances sufficient to warrant a
review, the request shall be dismissed and a notice of the dismissal
published in the Federal Register stating the reasons therefor.
* * * * *
By order of the Commission.
Issued: June 7, 2013.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2013-14004 Filed 6-17-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P