Updating OSHA Standards Based on National Consensus Standards; Signage, 35585-35593 [2013-13910]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 114 / Thursday, June 13, 2013 / Proposed Rules
(ii) Display system luminance (maximum
and ratio), relative noise, linearity,
modulation transfer function (MTF),
frequency, and glare should meet or exceed
recommendations listed in AAPM On-Line
Report No. 03, pages 1–146 (incorporated by
reference, see § 718.5). Viewing displays
must have a maximum luminance of at least
171 cd/m2, a ratio of maximum luminance to
minimum luminance of at least 250, and a
glare ratio greater than 400. The contribution
of ambient light reflected from the display
surface, after light sources have been
minimized, must be included in luminance
measurements.
(iii) Displays must be situated so as to
minimize front surface glare. Readers must
minimize reflected light from ambient
sources during the performance of
classifications.
(iv) Measurements of the width and length
of pleural shadows and the diameter of
opacities must be taken using calibrated
software measuring tools. If permitted by the
viewing software, a record must be made of
the presentation state(s), including any noise
reduction and edge enhancement or
restoration functions that were used in
performing the classification, including any
annotations and measurements.
(15) Quality control procedures for devices
used to display chest images for classification
must comply with the recommendations of
the American Association of Physicists in
Medicine AAPM On-Line Report No. 03,
pages 1–146 (incorporated by reference, see
§ 718.5). If automatic quality assurance
systems are used, visual inspection must be
performed using one or more test patterns
recommended by the medical physicist every
6 months, or more frequently, to check for
defects that automatic systems may not
detect.
(16) Classification of CR and DR digitallyacquired chest radiographs under this Part
must be performed based on the viewing
images displayed as soft copies using the
viewing workstations specified in this
section. Classification of radiographs must
not be based on the viewing of hard copy
printed transparencies of images that were
digitally-acquired.
(17) The classification of chest radiographs
based on digitized copies of chest
radiographs that were originally acquired
using film-screen techniques is not
permissible.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
PART 725—CLAIMS FOR BENEFITS
UNDER PART C OF TITLE IV OF THE
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ACT, AS AMENDED
8. The authority citation for part 725
is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; Reorganization
Plan No. 6 of 1950, 15 FR 3174; 30 U.S.C. 901
et seq., 902(f), 921, 932, 936; 33 U.S.C. 901
et seq.; 42 U.S.C. 405; Secretary’s Order 10–
2009, 74 FR 58834.
9. In § 725.406, revise paragraphs (a),
(b), (c) and (e) to read as follows:
■
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:11 Jun 12, 2013
Jkt 229001
§ 725.406
Medical examinations and tests.
(a) The Act requires the Department to
provide each miner who applies for
benefits with the opportunity to
undergo a complete pulmonary
evaluation at no expense to the miner.
A complete pulmonary evaluation
includes a report of physical
examination, a pulmonary function
study, a chest radiograph, and, unless
medically contraindicated, a blood gas
study.
(b) As soon as possible after a miner
files an application for benefits, the
district director will provide the miner
with a list of medical facilities and
physicians in the state of the miner’s
residence and states contiguous to the
state of the miner’s residence that the
Office has authorized to perform
complete pulmonary evaluations. The
miner must select one of the facilities or
physicians on the list, provided that the
miner may not select any physician to
whom the miner or the miner’s spouse
is related to the fourth degree of
consanguinity, and the miner may not
select any physician who has examined
or provided medical treatment to the
miner within the twelve months
preceding the date of the miner’s
application. The district director will
make arrangements for the miner to be
given a complete pulmonary evaluation
by that facility or physician. The results
of the complete pulmonary evaluation
must not be counted as evidence
submitted by the miner under § 725.414.
(c) If any medical examination or test
conducted under paragraph (a) of this
section is not administered or reported
in substantial compliance with the
provisions of part 718 of this
subchapter, or does not provide
sufficient information to allow the
district director to decide whether the
miner is eligible for benefits, the district
director must schedule the miner for
further examination and testing. Where
the deficiencies in the report are the
result of a lack of effort on the part of
the miner, the miner will be afforded
one additional opportunity to produce a
satisfactory result. In order to determine
whether any medical examination or
test was administered and reported in
substantial compliance with the
provisions of part 718 of this
subchapter, the district director may
have any component of such
examination or test reviewed by a
physician selected by the district
director.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) The cost of any medical
examination or test authorized under
this section, including the cost of travel
to and from the examination, must be
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
35585
paid by the fund. Reimbursement for
overnight accommodations must not be
authorized unless the district director
determines that an adequate testing
facility is unavailable within one day’s
round trip travel by automobile from the
miner’s residence. The fund must be
reimbursed for such payments by an
operator, if any, found liable for the
payment of benefits to the claimant. If
an operator fails to repay such expenses,
with interest, upon request of the Office,
the entire amount may be collected in
an action brought under section 424 of
the Act and § 725.603 of this part.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 3rd day of
June, 2013.
Gary A. Steinberg,
Acting Director, Office of Workers’
Compensation Programs.
[FR Doc. 2013–13971 Filed 6–12–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–CR–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
29 CFR Parts 1910 and 1926
[Docket No. OSHA–2013–0005]
RIN 1218–AC77
Updating OSHA Standards Based on
National Consensus Standards;
Signage
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), Department of
Labor.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking;
request for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Occupational Safety and
Health Administration (‘‘OSHA’’ or ‘‘the
Agency’’) proposes to update its general
industry and construction signage
standards by adding references to the
latest versions of the American National
Standards Institute (‘‘ANSI’’) standards
on specifications for accident
prevention signs and tags, ANSI
Z535.1–2006(R2011), Z535.2–2011, and
Z535.5–2011. OSHA also is proposing to
retain the existing references to the
earlier ANSI standards, ANSI Z53.1–
1967, Z35.1–1968, and Z35.2–1968, in
its signage standards, thereby providing
employers an option to comply with the
updated or earlier standards. In
addition, OSHA is proposing to
incorporate by reference Part VI of the
Manual of Uniform Traffic Control
Devices (‘‘MUTCD’’), 1988 Edition,
Revision 3, into the incorporation-byreference section of the construction
standards, having inadvertently omitted
this edition of the MUTCD from this
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
35586
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 114 / Thursday, June 13, 2013 / Proposed Rules
section during an earlier rulemaking,
and amend citations in two provisions
of the construction standards to show
the correct incorporation-by-reference
section. In addition, OSHA is
publishing a direct final rule in today’s
Federal Register adding the same
references.
DATES: Submit comments on this
proposed rule (including comments on
the information-collection (paperwork)
determination described under the
section titled Procedural
Determinations, hearing requests, and
other information by July 15, 2013. All
submissions must bear a postmark or
provide other evidence of the
submission date (the following section
titled ADDRESSES describes the available
methods of making submissions).
ADDRESSES: Submit comments, hearing
requests, and other information as
follows:
• Electronic. Submit comments
electronically to https://
www.regulations.gov, which is the
Federal eRulemaking Portal. Follow the
instructions online for submitting
comments.
• Facsimile. OSHA allows facsimile
transmission of comments and hearing
requests that are 10 pages or fewer in
length (including attachments). Send
these documents to the OSHA Docket
Office at (202) 693–1648; OSHA does
not require hard copies of these
documents. Instead of transmitting
facsimile copies of attachments that
supplement these documents (e.g.,
studies, journal articles), commenters
must submit these attachments to the
OSHA Docket Office, Technical Data
Center, Room N–2625, OSHA, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20210.
These attachments must clearly identify
the sender’s name, date, subject, and
docket number (i.e., OSHA–2013–0005)
so that the Agency can attach them to
the appropriate document.
• Regular mail, express delivery,
hand delivery, and messenger (courier)
service. Submit comments and any
additional material (e.g., studies, journal
articles) to the OSHA Docket Office,
Docket No. OSHA–2013–0005 or RIN
1218–AC77, Technical Data Center,
Room N–2625, OSHA, U.S. Department
of Labor, 200 Constitution Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20210; telephone: (202)
693–2350. (OSHA’s TTY number is
(877) 889–5627.) Note that security
procedures may result in significant
delays in receiving comments and other
written materials by regular mail.
Contact the OSHA Docket Office for
information about security procedures
for delivery of materials by express
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:12 Jun 12, 2013
Jkt 229001
delivery, hand delivery, and messenger
service. The hours of operation for the
OSHA Docket Office are 8:15 a.m. to
4:45 p.m., e.t.
• Instructions. All submissions must
include the Agency name and the OSHA
docket number (i.e., OSHA Docket No.
OSHA–2013–0005). OSHA will place
comments and other material, including
any personal information, in the public
docket without revision, and these
materials will be available online at
https://www.regulations.gov. Therefore,
the Agency cautions commenters about
submitting statements they do not want
made public, or submitting comments
that contain personal information
(either about themselves or others) such
as Social Security numbers, birth dates,
and medical data.
OSHA invites comment on all issues
related to this proposed rule. The
Agency also welcomes comments on its
findings that this proposed rule would
have no negative economic, paperwork,
or other regulatory impact on the
regulated community. This proposed
rule is the companion document of a
direct final rule published in the
‘‘Rules’’ section of today’s Federal
Register. If OSHA receives no
significant adverse comments on the
proposed rule or direct final rule, the
Agency will publish a Federal Register
notice confirming the effective date of
the final rule and withdrawing this
companion proposed rule. The final rule
may include minor stylistic or technical
corrections of the direct final rule. For
the purpose of judicial review, OSHA
considers the date that the Agency
confirms the effective date of the final
rule to be the date of issuance. If,
however, OSHA receives any significant
adverse comments on the direct final
rule or this proposal, the Agency will
publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule and proceed with this
proposed rule, which addresses the
same revisions of its signage standards.
• Docket. The electronic docket for
this proposed rule established at
https://www.regulations.gov lists most of
the documents in the docket. Some
information (e.g., copyrighted material),
however, cannot be read or downloaded
through this Web site. All submissions,
including copyrighted material, are
accessible at the OSHA Docket Office.
Contact the OSHA Docket Office for
assistance in locating docket
submissions.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
General information and press
inquiries: Contact Frank Meilinger,
OSHA, Office of Communications,
Room N–3647, U.S. Department of
Labor, 200 Constitution Ave. NW.,
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Washington, DC 20210; telephone: (202)
693–1999.
Technical inquiries: Contact Kenneth
Stevanus, Directorate of Standards and
Guidance, Room N–3609, OSHA, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20210;
telephone: (202) 693–2260; fax: (202)
693–1663.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Copies of this Federal Register notice.
Electronic copies of this Federal
Register notice are available at
https://www.regulations.gov. This
Federal Register notice, as well as news
releases and other relevant information,
also are available at OSHA’s Web page
at https://www.osha.gov.
Table of Contents
I. Direct Final Rulemaking
II. Background
III. Summary and Explanation of Revisions to
the Signage Standards
IV. Procedural Determinations
A. Legal Considerations
B. Preliminary Economic Analysis and
Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification
C. OMB Review Under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995
D. Federalism
E. State-Plan States
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
G. Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments
H. Consultation with the Advisory
Committee on Construction Safety and
Health
V. Authority and Signature
I. Direct Final Rulemaking
In a direct final rulemaking, an agency
publishes a direct final rule in the
Federal Register along with a statement
that the rule will become effective
unless the agency receives any
significant adverse comments within a
specified period. The agency also
publishes concurrently with the direct
final rule an identical proposed rule. If
the agency receives no significant
adverse comments, the direct final rule
will become effective. However, should
the agency receive any significant
adverse comments, the agency will
withdraw the direct final rule and treat
the comments as submissions on the
proposed rule.
OSHA uses direct final rules to
update existing consensus standards
when it expects the rulemaking to be
noncontroversial; when the rule
provides protection to employees that is
at least equivalent to the protection
afforded to them by the previous
standard-development organization
standard; and when the rule imposes no
significant new compliance costs on
employers (69 FR 68283, 68285 (2004)).
OSHA used direct final rules previously
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 114 / Thursday, June 13, 2013 / Proposed Rules
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
to update or, when appropriate, revoke
references to previous national
consensus standards in OSHA rules
(see, e.g., 69 FR 68283 (2004); 70 FR
76979 (2006); 76 FR 75782 (2011); and
77 FR 37587 (2012)).
For the purposes of a direct final rule,
a significant adverse comment is one
that ‘‘explains why the rule would be
inappropriate, including challenges to
the rule’s underlying premise or
approach, or why it would be ineffective
or unacceptable without a change’’ (see
60 FR 43108, 43111(1995)). In
determining whether a comment
necessitates withdrawal of the direct
final rule, OSHA will consider whether
the comment raises an issue serious
enough to warrant a substantive
response in a notice-and-comment
process. OSHA will not consider a
comment recommending additional
revisions to a rule to be a significant
adverse comment unless the comment
states why the direct final rule would be
ineffective without the revisions. If
OSHA receives a timely significant
adverse comment, it will publish a
Federal Register notice withdrawing the
direct final rule no later than 90 days
after the publication date of this current
notice.
This notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) furthers the objectives of
Executive Order 13563, which requires
that the regulatory process ‘‘promote
predictability and reduce uncertainty’’
and ‘‘identify and use the best, most
innovative and least burdensome tools
for achieving regulatory ends.’’ As
described below, the revisions will
make the requirements of OSHA’s
signage standards consistent with the
most recent national consensus
standards, thereby increasing
employers’ compliance flexibility
without compromising employee safety
(for the purposes of this rulemaking, the
term ‘‘signage standards’’ refers to
standards that regulate both signs and
tags). Accordingly, the Agency
concludes that updating the references
to the national consensus standards in
its signage standards is consistent with,
and promotes the objectives of,
Executive Order 13563.
II. Background
In June 2009, the National Electrical
Manufacturers Association (NEMA)
contacted OSHA and, based on a letter
from ANSI, requested that the Agency
add references to the latest versions of
ANSI’s Z535 series of standards to
OSHA’s signage standards. Letter dated
June 2, 2009, from Kyle Pitsor, Vice
President, Government Relations,
NEMA, to Richard Fairfax, Director,
Directorate of Enforcement Programs,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:12 Jun 12, 2013
Jkt 229001
OSHA (Ex. OSHA–2013–0005–0003, p.
1), attaching a letter dated May 28, 2009,
from Geoffrey Peckham, Chair, ANSI
Z535.2 Subcommittee, to Mr. Fairfax
(Ex. OSHA–2013–0005–0003, p. 3).
NEMA specifically advocated
incorporating by reference ANSI Z535.2,
‘‘Environmental and Facility Safety
Signs,’’ in OSHA standards that refer to
old 1 versions of this ANSI standard.
Pitsor letter (Ex. OSHA–2013–0005–
0003, p. 1); accord Peckham letter (Ex.
OSHA–2013–0005–0003, p. 3).
Over the next few years, OSHA staff
met with NEMA several times to discuss
the association’s request that OSHA
adopt ANSI’s Z535 series of standards.
Besides urging OSHA to incorporate
ANSI Z535.2 by reference, NEMA also
asked the Agency to update its
standards’ references to ANSI Z53.1–67,
‘‘Safety Color Code for Marking Physical
Hazards and the Identification of
Certain Equipment,’’ by citing the
current version of this standard, ANSI
Z535.1, ‘‘Safety Colors.’’ As a result of
these meetings and as recorded in a
second letter to OSHA, NEMA provided
the Agency with side-by-side
comparisons of ANSI Z35.1–68, Z535.2–
2007, and Z535.2–2011, and ANSI
Z53.1–67, Z535.1–2006, and Z535.1–
2006(R2011), and other relevant
materials such as signs, which OSHA
evaluated. Letter dated March 30, 2011,
from Evan Gaddis, President and CEO,
NEMA, to Dr. David Michaels, Assistant
Secretary of Labor for Occupational
Safety and Health; Side-by-Side
Comparisons of ANSI standards; NEMA
Signage Materials (Exs. OSHA–2013–
0005–0004 through –0006). OSHA also
subsequently considered whether it
should also incorporate by reference
ANSI Z535.5, ‘‘Safety Tags and
Barricade Tapes (for Temporary
Hazards),’’ into those OSHA standards
that refer to a much older version of this
ANSI standard.
At present, employers continue to use
the old signs and tags not only because
they are long-lasting and rarely need
replacing, but also because they comply
with OSHA’s current signage standards,
which incorporate the old ANSI
standards by reference. Both NEMA and
ANSI contend that incorporating the
new ANSI standards by reference is
necessary to encourage employers to
buy and use signs and tags that comply
with these standards without receiving
a de minimis notice for failure to
comply with the old ANSI standards.2
1 The terms ‘‘old’’ and ‘‘older,’’ as used in this
Federal Register notice, refer specifically to signs
or tags that comply with ANSI Z53.1–1967, Z35.1–
1968, and Z35.2–1968.
2 According to OSHA’s Field Operations Manual
(FOM), a de minimis condition occurs when ‘‘[a]n
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
35587
Pitsor letter (Ex. OSHA–2013–0005–
0003, p. 1); Peckham letter (Ex. OSHA–
2013–0005–0003, p. 3).
NEMA and ANSI further assert that
signs and tags meeting the latest version
of the ANSI standards, the Z535 series,
provide an equal or greater level of
protection than the currently required
signs that comply with the old ANSI
standards, Z35.1, Z35.2, and Z53.1,
cited in OSHA’s standards. Pitsor letter
(Ex. OSHA–2013–0005–0003, p. 1);
Peckham letter (Ex. OSHA–2013–0005–
0003, p. 3). In its letter, ANSI provides
an exhibit demonstrating why it
believes the new Z535.2–2007 signs are
at least as protective as the old Z35.1
signs (Peckham letter, Ex. OSHA–2013–
0005–0003, p. 10 (Peckham’s Ex. 6).3
The exhibit, which compares the
information contained in the two sets of
signs, shows that the new Z535.2 signs
typically have at least as much
information as the old, Z35.1, signs.
Moreover, the new ANSI safety-color
standard, ANSI Z535.1–2006(2011),
includes two safety colors, brown and
gray, that were not in Z53.1–1967. See
ANSI Z535.1–2006(2011), pp. v–vi
(ANSI also added safety blue in the
1979 revision after deleting this color in
the 1971 revision).
ANSI and NEMA also claim that the
new signs provide additional
information, including the specific
identity of the hazard, a description of
how serious the hazard is, how to avoid
the hazard, and the probable
consequences of not avoiding the
hazard. Peckham letter (Exs. OSHA–
2013–0005–0003, pp. 7–9, and OSHA–
2013–0005–0006, pp. 9–11). ANSI
further argues that the old sign formats
‘‘lack the ability to contain [the]
symbols, more extensive word
messages, multiple messages, and
additional languages’’ necessary to
communicate critical safety information
to an increasingly multicultural work
force. Id., pp. 6 and 9–10. NEMA also
submitted an ANSI timeline of the
institute’s standards, and the safety
signs that complied with those
employer has implemented a measure different than
the one specified in a standard, that has no direct
or immediate relationship to safety or health.’’
FOM, CPL 02–00–150, Ch. 4, § VIII, pp. 4–36 to 4–
37 (Apr. 22, 2011), available on OSHA’s Web page.
OSHA issues no citations or penalties for these
conditions, but compliance officers will document
the condition during an inspection. Id. at 4–36. See,
also, Letter of Interpretation dated February 22,
2011, from Thomas Galassi, Director, Directorate of
Enforcement Programs, OSHA, to Richard A. Eichel,
ATA Safety, describing OSHA’s de minimis
enforcement policy with regard to ANSI signs;
available at https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/
owadisp.show_document?p_table=INTERPRET
ATIONS&p_id=27641.
3 This exhibit is actually Exhibit 6 of the Peckham
letter, but is mislabeled as Exhibit 5.
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
35588
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 114 / Thursday, June 13, 2013 / Proposed Rules
standards, for the years 1914 to 2011;
this timeline illustrates additions made
to the information contained in these
signs during this period. NEMA Signage
Materials, pp. 6–8 (Ex. OSHA–2013–
0005–0006). Based on the available
record, OSHA believes that the new
signs are at least as protective as the old
ones. Therefore, this NPRM is proposing
to incorporate the ANSI Z535 series by
reference in the applicable OSHA
signage standards so that employers will
be able to buy and use the new signs
without the prospect of receiving de
minimis notices for using noncompliant
signs. OSHA invites the public to
comment on its conclusion that the new
signs are as effective as the old ones.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
III. Summary and Explanation of
Revisions to the Signage Standards
As discussed in a previous Federal
Register notice (69 FR 68283 (2004)),
OSHA is undertaking a series of projects
to update its standards to incorporate
the latest versions of national consensus
and industry standards. These projects
include updating or removing national
consensus and industry standards cited
in existing OSHA standards, updating
the text of standards that OSHA adopted
directly from previous national
consensus standards, and, when
appropriate, replacing specific
references to previous national
consensus and industry standards with
performance requirements.
This NPRM proposes to update the
references to ANSI consensus standards
in four provisions of OSHA’s general
industry and construction standards: 29
CFR 1910.97, Nonionizing radiation;
§ 1910.145, Specifications for accident
prevention signs and tags; § 1910.261,
Pulp, paper, and paper board mills; and
§ 1926.200, Accident prevention signs
and tags. These provisions incorporate
by reference ANSI consensus standards
Z53.1–1967, ‘‘Safety Color Code for
Marking Physical Hazards and the
Identification of Certain Equipment’’;
Z35.1–1968, ‘‘Specifications for
Accident Prevention Signs’’; and Z35.2–
1968, ‘‘Specifications for Accident
Prevention Tags.’’ The NPRM would
allow employers to comply with either
these ANSI standards or the latest
versions of them, Z535.1–2006(R2011),
Z535.2–2011, and Z535.5–2011. The
latter compliance option would allow
employers to update their signage based
on the newest ANSI consensus
standards without violating OSHA’s
requirements. In addition, since
employers would not have to update
their signage, there would be no
additional compliance cost or burden
resulting from this rulemaking. The
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:12 Jun 12, 2013
Jkt 229001
NPRM would revise the above four
provisions in the following ways:
(1) OSHA’s general industry standard
on nonionizing radiation at
§ 1910.97(a)(3)(ii) requires employers to
use the color specification provided by
ANSI 53.1–1953, ‘‘Safety Color Code for
Marking Physical Hazards,’’ which
OSHA incorporated by reference under
§ 1910.6 in 1974 (39 FR 23502 (1974)).
Currently, § 1910.6 refers to ANSI
Z53.1–1967, ‘‘Safety Color Code for
Marking Physical Hazards and the
Identification of Certain Equipment’’
because, on March 7, 1996, OSHA
incorporated ANSI Z53.1–1967 by
reference under § 1910.6 without
revising the reference to ANSI Z53.1–
1953 in § 1910.97(a)(3)(ii) (see 61 FR
9228, 9232 (1996)). In addition, OSHA
did not obtain approval from the Office
of the Federal Register during the 1996
rulemaking to incorporate ANSI Z53.1–
1967 by reference under § 1910.6. With
this NPRM, OSHA would correct this
oversight by incorporating ANSI Z53.1–
1967 by reference under § 1910.6 after
obtaining approval to do so from the
Office of the Federal Register. In
addition, this NPRM would update the
nonionizing radiation provision by
incorporating ANSI Z535.1–
2006(R2011), ‘‘Safety Colors,’’ by
reference. This addition would allow
employers to comply with the 1967
version or the 2006(R2011) version of
the cited ANSI standard.
(2) OSHA’s general industry standard
on specifications for accidentprevention signs and tags at § 1910.145
refers to ANSI standard Z53.1–1967,
‘‘Safety Colors for Marking Physical
Hazards and the Identification of
Certain Equipment,’’ which § 1910.6
incorporated by reference in three
places: §§ 1910.145(d)(2), Danger signs;
1910.145(d)(4), Caution signs; and
1910.145(d)(6), Safety instruction signs.
However, as noted above, the Office of
the Federal Register did not approve
ANSI Z53.1–1967 for incorporation by
reference under § 1910.6. Therefore, this
NPRM would correct this oversight by
incorporating that ANSI standard by
reference under § 1910.6 after receiving
approval from the Office of the Federal
Register to do so.
Each of the three cited provisions of
§ 1910.145(d) specifies the colors
employers must use for each type of
sign, and requires that the signs meet
the specifications in Table 1,
‘‘Fundamental Specification of Safety
Colors for CIE Standard Source ‘C,’ ’’ of
ANSI Z53.1–1967. The NPRM would
update each of these sections by
referencing Table 1, ‘‘Specification of
the Safety Colors for CIE Illuminate C
and the CIE 1931, 2° Standard
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Observer,’’ of ANSI Z535.1–
2006(R2011), ‘‘Safety Colors,’’ which it
incorporates by reference. This addition
would allow employers to comply with
the 1967 version or the 2006(R2011)
version of the cited ANSI standard.
(3) OSHA’s general industry standard
on pulp, paper, and paper board mills
at § 1910.261 refers to ANSI Z35.1–
1968, ‘‘Specifications for Accident
Prevention Signs,’’ which
§ 1910.6(e)(59) incorporates by reference
in two places. First, § 1910.261(c)(16)
refers to this 1968 ANSI standard. The
NPRM would update § 1910.261(c)(16)
by incorporating ANSI Z535.2–2011,
‘‘Environmental and Facility Safety
Signs,’’ by reference in § 1910.6(e)(60).
This addition would allow employers to
comply with the 1968 version or the
2011 version of the cited ANSI standard.
Second, § 1910.6(e)(59) incorporates
Z35.1–1968, ‘‘Specifications for
Accident Prevention Signs,’’ by
reference in § 1910.261(a)(3)(xxiv).
However, on June 18, 1998, as part of an
OSHA rulemaking, the Agency removed
subsection § 1910.261(a)(3)(xxiv) from
the pulp, paper, and paper board mills
standard, but did not remove the
reference to § 1910.261(a)(3)(xxiv) in
§ 1910.6(e)(59). The NPRM would
correct this oversight.
(4) OSHA’s construction standard on
accident prevention signs and tags,
§ 1926.200, refers to ANSI standards
Z35.1–1968, ‘‘Specifications for
Accident Prevention Signs’’; Z35.2–
1968, ‘‘Specifications for Accident
Prevention Tags’’; or Z53.1–1967,
‘‘Safety Color Code for Marking Physical
Hazards and the Identification of
Certain Equipment,’’ in five places
discussed below.4 In addition, as
discussed below, § 1926.200 would
incorporate by reference Part VI of the
MUTCD, 1988 Edition, Revision 3.
The first reference to one of these old
ANSI standards is in § 1926.200(b)(1),
Danger signs, which refers to Figure G–
1, which is identical to Figure 1 in ANSI
Z35.1–1968, ‘‘Specifications for
Accident Prevention Signs.’’ The second
reference is in § 1926.200(c)(1), Caution
signs, which refers to Figure G–2, which
is identical to Figure 4 in the same ANSI
standard. The NPRM would remove
Figures G–1 and G–2 from
§ 1926.200(b)(1) and (c)(1), and update
these provisions by referencing the
appropriate figures from ANSI Z35.1–
1968 and ANSI Z535.2–2011,
‘‘Environmental and Facility Safety
4 Although § 1926.200(c)(3) currently refers to
ANSI Z53.1–1967, OSHA did not incorporate that
ANSI standard by reference under § 1926.6. This
NPRM, therefore, would correct this oversight by
incorporating ANSI Z53.1–1967 by reference under
§ 1926.6.
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 114 / Thursday, June 13, 2013 / Proposed Rules
Signs.’’ These revisions, therefore,
would give employers the option of
using the figures from either ANSI
standard.
The third reference to an old ANSI
standard is in § 1926.200(c)(3), which
refers to ANSI Z53.1–1967, ‘‘Safety
Color Code for Marking Physical
Hazards and the Identification of
Certain Equipment.’’ This OSHA
provision specifies the colors employers
must use in caution signs, and requires
that the signs meet the specifications in
Table 1 of ANSI Z53.1–1967. This
NPRM would update § 1926.200(c)(3) by
adding a reference to Table 1 of ANSI
Z535.1–2006(R2011), ‘‘Safety Colors,’’
the latest version of Z53.1–1967. This
addition, therefore, would allow
employers to use either Table 1 of
Z53.1–1967 or Table 1 of Z535.1–
2006(R2011).
The fourth reference to an old ANSI
standard is in § 1926.200(h)(2), Accident
prevention tags, which says that
specifications for accident-prevention
tags similar to the specifications in
Table G–1 apply; OSHA based Table G–
1 on Figures 1 to 4 in ANSI Z35.2–1968,
‘‘Specifications for Accident Prevention
Tags.’’ The NPRM would remove Table
G–1 from § 1926.200(h)(2), and update
this provision by referencing Figures 1
to 4 of ANSI Z35.2–1968 and Figures 1
to 8 of Z535.5–2011, ‘‘Safety Tags and
Barricade Tapes (for Temporary
Hazards).’’ These revisions, therefore,
would give employers the option of
using the figures from either ANSI
standard.
The fifth reference to the old ANSI
standards is in § 1926.200(i), which
refers to ANSI Z35.1–1968,
‘‘Specifications for Accident Prevention
Signs,’’ and Z35.2–1968, ‘‘Specifications
for Accident Prevention Tags.’’ Section
1926.200(i) requires employers to follow
these two ANSI standards with respect
to OSHA rules not specifically
prescribed in 29 CFR 1926, subpart G.
This NPRM would update § 1926.200(i)
by adding Z535.2–2011,
‘‘Environmental and Facility Safety
Signs,’’ and Z535.5–2011, ‘‘Safety Tags
and Barricade Tapes (for Temporary
Hazards),’’ the latest versions of the
cited ANSI standards, as references.
These additions would allow employers
to comply with Z35.1–1968 or Z535.2–
11 for signs, and Z35.2–1968 or Z535.5–
11 for tags.
This NPRM also would update
paragraph (g)(2) of § 1926.200 by
removing the language referring to the
Director of the Federal Register’s
approval for incorporation by reference
of Part VI of the 1988 Edition, Revision
3, of the MUTCD, and adding a
reference to § 1926.6 instead (i.e., this
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:12 Jun 12, 2013
Jkt 229001
reference indicates such approval).
Additionally, in an earlier rulemaking
(see 75 FR 47906, 48132 (2010)), OSHA
inadvertently removed Part VI of the
MUTCD from § 1926.6. This NPRM
would correct this oversight by
returning the reference to Part VI of the
MUTCD to § 1926.6; it also would
remove the reference to § 1926.200(g)(2)
as the incorporation-by-reference
provision in § 1926.201(a) and
§ 1926.202, and replace it with a
reference to § 1926.6.
In summary, OSHA believes, based on
the discussion above under Background,
that many general industry and
construction employers currently
comply with the ANSI signage
requirements incorporated by reference
in its existing signage standards, i.e.,
ANSI Z35.1–1968, Z35.2–1968, and
Z53.1–1967. Therefore, OSHA is
proposing to retain these requirements
in its signage standards. OSHA also
determined that the latest editions of the
ANSI signage standards, i.e., Z535.1–
2006(R2011), Z535.2–2011, and Z535.5–
2011, provide at least as effective
protection to employees as the old ANSI
standards incorporated by reference in
the Agency’s signage standards.
Accordingly, this NPRM would give
employers the option of complying with
the old or the new ANSI standards.
Since employers could choose to
comply with OSHA’s existing signage
standards, incorporating the new ANSI
standards by reference would not
increase the cost or burden of
compliance.
IV. Procedural Determinations
A. Legal Considerations
The purpose of the Occupational
Safety and Health Act of 1970 (OSH
Act), 29 U.S.C. 65–78, is to assure, as far
as possible, safe and healthful working
conditions for all employees. 29 U.S.C.
651(b). To achieve this goal, Congress
authorized the Secretary of Labor to
promulgate and enforce occupational
safety and health standards. 29 U.S.C.
654(b), 655(b). A safety or health
standard is a standard that ‘‘requires
conditions, or the adoption or use of one
or more practices, means, methods,
operations, or processes reasonably
necessary or appropriate to provide safe
or healthful employment and places of
employment.’’ 29 U.S.C. 652(8). A
standard is reasonably necessary or
appropriate within the meaning of
Section 652(8) of the OSH Act when a
significant risk of material harm exists
in the workplace and the proposed
standard would substantially reduce or
eliminate that workplace risk. See
Industrial Union Department, AFL–CIO
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
35589
v. American Petroleum Institute, 448
U.S. 607 (1980). OSHA has already
determined that requirements specified
by signage standards, including design
requirements, are reasonably necessary
or appropriate within the meaning of
Section 652(8) (see, e.g., 49 FR 49726,
49737 (1978); 51 FR 33251, 33251–
33259 (1986)).
This NPRM would neither reduce
employee protection nor alter an
employer’s obligations under the
existing standards. Under this NPRM,
employers would be able to continue to
use the same signs and tags they are
using currently to meet their
compliance obligations under the
existing standards’ design-criteria
requirements. This NPRM would
provide employers with additional
options for meeting the design-criteria
requirements for signage protection.
Therefore, this NPRM would not alter
the substantive protection that
employers must provide to employees
or impose a new compliance burden on
employers. Accordingly, OSHA need
not, in this rulemaking, determine
significant risk or the extent to which
this NPRM would reduce that risk, as
typically required by Industrial Union
Department.
B. Preliminary Economic Analysis and
Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification
This NPRM is not economically
significant within the context of
Executive Order 12866, or a major rule
under the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act or Section 801 of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. In
addition, this NPRM complies with
Executive Order 13563. The rulemaking
imposes no additional costs on any
private-sector or public-sector entity,
and does not meet any of the criteria for
an economically significant or major
rule specified by the Executive Order or
relevant statutes.
This rulemaking would allow
employers increased flexibility in
choosing signage for the protection of
their employees. This NPRM, however,
would not require an employer to
update or replace its signage solely as a
result of this rule if the employer’s
current signage protection meets the
revised standards. Because the NPRM
imposes no costs, OSHA certifies that it
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
C. OMB Review Under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995
This rulemaking does not impose new
information-collection requirements for
purposes of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501–30.
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
35590
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 114 / Thursday, June 13, 2013 / Proposed Rules
Accordingly, the Agency does not have
to prepare an Information Collection
Request in association with this
rulemaking.
Members of the public may respond
to this paperwork determination by
sending their written comments to the
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Attn: OSHA Desk Officer (RIN
1218–AC77), Office of Management and
Budget, Room 10235, 725 17th Street
NW., Washington, DC 20503. The
Agency encourages commenters to
submit these comments to the
rulemaking docket, along with their
comments on other parts of this NPRM.
For instructions on submitting these
comments and accessing the docket, see
the sections of this Federal Register
notice titled DATES and ADDRESSES.
OSHA, however, will not consider any
comment received on this paperwork
determination to be a ‘‘significant
adverse comment’’ as specified above
under the section titled Direct Final
Rulemaking.
To make inquiries, or to request other
information, contact Mr. Todd Owen,
Directorate of Standards and Guidance,
OSHA, Room N–3609, U.S. Department
of Labor, 200 Constitution Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20210; telephone (202)
693–2222.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
D. Federalism
OSHA reviewed this NPRM in
accordance with the Executive Order on
Federalism (Executive Order 13132, 64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999), which
requires that agencies, to the extent
possible, refrain from limiting state
policy options, consult with states prior
to taking any actions that would restrict
state policy options, and take such
actions only when clear constitutional
authority exists and the problem is
national in scope. Executive Order
13132 provides for preemption of state
law only with the expressed consent of
Congress. Agencies must limit any such
preemption to the extent possible.
Under Section 18 of the OSH Act, 29
U.S.C. 667, Congress expressly provides
that states may adopt, with Federal
approval, a plan for the development
and enforcement of occupational safety
and health standards (29 U.S.C. 667);
OSHA refers to states that obtain
Federal approval for such a plan as
‘‘State-Plan states.’’ Occupational safety
and health standards developed by
State-Plan states must be at least as
effective in providing safe and healthful
employment and places of employment
as the Federal standards. Subject to
these requirements, State-Plan states are
free to develop and enforce under state
law their own requirements for
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:12 Jun 12, 2013
Jkt 229001
occupational safety and health
standards.
While OSHA drafted this NPRM to
protect employees in every state,
Section 18(c)(2) of the OSH Act permits
State-Plan states and U.S. territories to
develop and enforce their own
standards for signage protection
provided these requirements are at least
as effective in providing safe and
healthful employment and places of
employment as the requirements
specified in this NPRM.
In summary, this NPRM complies
with Executive Order 13132. In states
without OSHA-approved state plans,
this rulemaking limits state policy
options in the same manner as other
OSHA standards. In State-Plan states,
this rulemaking does not significantly
limit state policy options because, as
explained in the following section,
State-Plan states do not have to adopt
any final standard developed from this
NPRM.
E. State-Plan States
When Federal OSHA promulgates a
new standard or amends an existing
standard to make it more stringent, the
27 states or U.S. territories with their
own OSHA-approved occupational
safety and health plans must revise their
standards to reflect the new standard or
amendment, or show OSHA why such
action is unnecessary, e.g., because an
existing state standard covering this area
is at least as effective in protecting
workers as the new Federal standard or
amendment. 29 CFR 1953.5(a). In this
regard, the state standard must be at
least as effective as the final Federal
rule. State-Plan states must adopt the
Federal standard or complete their own
standard within six months of the
publication date of the final Federal
rule. When OSHA promulgates a new
standard or amendment that does not
impose additional or more stringent
requirements than the existing standard,
State-Plan states need not amend their
standards, although OSHA may
encourage them to do so. The following
21 states and 1 U.S. territory have
OSHA-approved occupational safety
and health plans that apply only to
private-sector employers: Alaska,
Arizona, California, Hawaii, Indiana,
Iowa, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan,
Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, North
Carolina, Oregon, Puerto Rico, South
Carolina, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont,
Virginia, Washington, and Wyoming. In
addition, Connecticut, Illinois, New
Jersey, New York, and the Virgin Islands
have OSHA-approved state plans that
apply only to state and local
government employees.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
This NPRM would not impose any
additional or more stringent
requirements on employers compared to
existing OSHA standards. This NPRM
proposes to incorporate by reference
three recent editions of the applicable
national consensus standards in OSHA’s
existing signage protection standards.
This NPRM would not require
employers to update or replace their
signage solely as a result of this
rulemaking if their current signage
meets the requirements of this NPRM.
OSHA believes that adding the new
references to ANSI Z535.1–2006(R2011),
ANSI Z535.2–2011, and ANSI Z535.5–
2011, while retaining the current
references to ANSI Z35.1–1968, Z35.2–
1968, and Z53.1–1967, would impose
no additional compliance obligations on
employers because employers can
continue using their existing signage
and, when necessary, update their
signage and not be out of compliance.
Therefore, this NPRM does not
require action under 29 CFR 1953.5(a),
and State-Plan states do not need to
adopt this rule or show OSHA why such
action is unnecessary. However, to the
extent these State-Plan states have the
same standards as the OSHA standards
affected by this NPRM, OSHA
encourages them to adopt the
amendments that may result from this
rulemaking.
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
OSHA reviewed this NPRM according
to the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (UMRA), 2 U.S.C. 1501–1571,
and Executive Order 12875, 58 FR
58093 (1993). 75 FR 48130; 2010. As
discussed above in Section IV.B (‘‘Final
Economic Analysis and Regulatory
Flexibility Certification’’) of this
preamble, OSHA determined that this
NPRM imposes no additional costs on
any private-sector or public-sector
entity. Accordingly, this NPRM requires
no additional expenditures by either
public or private employers.
As noted above under Section IV.E
(‘‘State-Plan States’’) of this preamble,
OSHA standards do not apply to state or
local governments except in states that
elected voluntarily to adopt an OSHAapproved state plan. Consequently, this
NPRM does not meet the definition of
a ‘‘Federal intergovernmental mandate’’
(see Section 421(5) of the UMRA, 2
U.S.C. 658(5)). Therefore, for the
purposes of the UMRA, OSHA certifies
that this NPRM does not mandate that
state, local, or tribal governments adopt
new, unfunded regulatory obligations,
or increase expenditures by the private
sector of more than $100 million in any
year.
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 114 / Thursday, June 13, 2013 / Proposed Rules
G. Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Governments
OSHA reviewed this NPRM in
accordance with Executive Order 13175,
65 FR 67249 (2000), and determined
that it does not have ‘‘tribal
implications’’ as defined in that order.
This NPRM does not have substantial
direct effects on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
government and Indian tribes.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
H. Consultation With the Advisory
Committee on Construction Safety and
Health
Under 29 CFR parts 1911 and 1912,
OSHA must consult with the Advisory
Committee on Construction Safety and
Health (‘‘ACCSH’’ or ‘‘the Committee’’),
established pursuant to Section 107 of
the Contract Work Hours and Safety
Standards Act, 40 U.S.C. 3701–3708, in
setting standards for construction work.
Specifically, § 1911.10(a) requires the
Assistant Secretary to provide ACCSH
with a proposed rule (along with
pertinent factual information), and give
the Committee an opportunity to submit
recommendations. See, also, § 1912.3(a)
(‘‘[W]henever occupational safety or
health standards for construction
activities are proposed, the Assistant
Secretary [for Occupational Safety and
Health] shall consult the Advisory
Committee’’).
On March 18, 2013, OSHA presented
to the ACCSH a draft of this NPRM, as
well as a table comparing the current
regulatory text with the proposed
regulatory text for the provisions of 29
CFR 1926.200 subject to this
rulemaking. OSHA explained that it was
proposing to update these provisions by
allowing employers to comply with
either the older ANSI standards, Z35.1–
1968, Z35.2–1968, and Z53.1–1967, or
the latest ANSI standards, Z535.1–
006(R2011), Z535.2–2011, and Z535.5–
2011. The ACCSH subsequently
recommended that OSHA proceed with
the proposed rule to update § 1926.200
(a transcript of these proceedings is
available at Docket No. OSHA–2013–
0005–0007, pp. 41–46). ACCSH
members also suggested that OSHA
consider replacing the illustrations of
the old signs and tags it is removing
from § 1926.200(b)(1), (c)(1), and (h)(2)
with the new ones, or a combination of
the old ones and the new ones. Id. at
21–23. OSHA will consider this
suggestion for a future rulemaking.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:12 Jun 12, 2013
Jkt 229001
V. Authority and Signature
David Michaels, Ph.D., MPH,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20210,
authorized the preparation of this
NPRM. OSHA is issuing this NPRM
pursuant to 29 U.S.C. 653, 655, and 657;
5 U.S.C. 553; 40 U.S.C. 3701–3708;
Secretary of Labor’s Order 1–2012, 77
FR 3912 (2012); and 29 CFR part 1911.
List of Subjects in 29 CFR Parts 1910
and 1926
Construction, General industry,
Occupational safety and health, Safety,
Signs, Tags.
Signed at Washington, DC, on June 5, 2013.
David Michaels,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational
Safety and Health.
Proposed Amendments to Standards
For the reasons stated above in the
preamble, the Occupational Safety and
Health Administration is proposing to
amend 29 CFR parts 1910 and 1926 as
follows:
PART 1910—[AMENDED]
Subpart A—[Amended]
1. The authority citation for subpart A
of part 1910 continues to read as
follows:
35591
877–413–5184; Web site:
www.global.ihs.com.
*
*
*
*
*
(65) USAS Z53.1–1967 (also referred
to as ANSI Z53.1–1967), Safety Color
Code for Marking Physical Hazards,
ANSI approved October 9, 1967; IBR
approved for § 1910.97(a) and
1910.145(d). Copies available for
purchase from the IHS Standards Store,
15 Inverness Way East, Englewood, CO
80112; telephone: 1–877–413–5184;
Web site: www.global.ihs.com.
(66) ANSI Z535.1–2006(R2011),
Safety Colors, reaffirmed July 19, 2011;
IBR approved for §§ 1910.97(a) and
1910.145(d). Copies available for
purchase from the International Safety
Equipment Association, 1901 North
Moore Street, Arlington, VA 22209–
1762; telephone: 703–525–1695; fax:
703–528–2148; Web site:
www.safetyequipment.org.
(67) ANSI Z535.2–2011,
Environmental and Facility Safety
Signs, published September 15, 2011;
IBR approved for § 1910.261(c). Copies
available for purchase from the
International Safety Equipment
Association, 1901 North Moore Street,
Arlington, VA 22209–1762; telephone:
703–525–1695; fax: 703–528–2148; Web
site: www.safetyequipment.org.
*
*
*
*
*
■
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 653, 655, 657;
Secretary of Labor’s Order No. 12–71 (36 FR
8754), 8–76 (41 FR 25059), 9–83 (48 FR
35736), 1–90 (55 FR 9033), 6–96 (62 FR 111),
3–2000 (65 FR 50017), 5–2002 (67 FR 65008),
5–2007 (72 FR 31159), 4–2010 (75 FR 55355),
or 1–2012 (77 FR 3912), as applicable.
Sections 1910.6, 1910.7, 1910.8 and 1910.9
also issued under 29 CFR 1911. Section
1910.7(f) also issued under 31 U.S.C. 9701,
29 U.S.C. 9a, 5 U.S.C. 553; Public Law 106–
113 (113 Stat. 1501A–222); Pub. L. 11–8 and
111–317; and OMB Circular A–25 (dated July
8, 1993) (58 FR 38142, July 15, 1993).
2. Amend § 1910.6 as follows:
■ a. Revise paragraphs (e)(59) and
(e)(65);
■ b. Redesignate paragraphs (e)(66)
through (e)(77) as paragraphs (e)(68)
through (e)(79); and
■ c. Add paragraphs (e)(66) and (e)(67).
■
§ 1910.6
Incorporation by reference.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(59) ANSI Z35.1–1968, Specifications
for Accident Prevention Signs; IBR
approved for § 1910.261(c). Copies
available for purchase from the IHS
Standards Store, 15 Inverness Way East,
Englewood, CO 80112; telephone: 1–
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Subpart G—[Amended]
3. Revise the authority citation for
subpart G of part 1910 to read as
follows:
■
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 653, 655, 657;
Secretary of Labor’s Order No. 12–71 (36 FR
8754), 8–76 (41 FR 25059), 9–83 (48 FR
35736), 1–90 (55 FR 9033), 6–96 (62 FR 111),
3–2000 (65 FR 50017), 5–2002 (67 FR 50017),
5–2007 (72 FR 31159), 4–2010 (75 FR 55355),
or 1–2012 (77 FR 3912), as applicable; and
29 CFR part 1911.
4. Amend § 1910.97 by revising
paragraph (a)(3)(ii) to read as follows:
■
§ 1910.97
Nonionizing radiation.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(3) * * *
(ii) ANSI Z53.1–1967 or ANSI
Z535.1–2006(R2011), incorporated by
reference in § 1910.6, is for use for color
specification. All lettering and the
border shall be of aluminum color.
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart J—[Amended]
5. Revise the authority citation for
subpart J of part 1910 to read as follows:
■
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 653, 655, 657;
Secretary of Labor’s Order No. 12–71 (36 FR
8754), 8–76 (41 FR 25059), 9–83 (48 FR
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
35592
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 114 / Thursday, June 13, 2013 / Proposed Rules
35736), 1–90 (55 FR 9033), 6–96 (62 FR 111),
3–2000 (65 FR 50017), 5–2007 (72 FR 31159),
4–2010 (75 FR 55355), or 1–2012 (77 FR
3912), as applicable.
Sections 1910.141, 1910.142, 1910.145,
1910.146, and 1910.147 also issued under 29
CFR part 1911.
6. Amend § 1910.145 by revising
paragraphs (d)(2), (d)(4), and (d)(6) to
read as follows:
■
(16) Signs. When conveyors cross
walkways or roadways in the yards, the
employer must erect signs reading
‘‘Danger—Overhead Conveyor’’ or an
equivalent warning, in accordance with
ANSI Z35.1–1968 or ANSI Z535.2–2011,
incorporated by reference in § 1910.6.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 1926—[AMENDED]
§ 1910.145 Specifications for accident
prevention signs and tags.
Subpart A—[Amended]
*
■
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(2) Danger signs. The colors red,
black, and white shall be those of
opaque glossy samples as specified in
Table 1, ‘‘Fundamental Specification of
Safety Colors for CIE Standard Source
‘C,’ ’’ of ANSI Z53.1–1967 or in Table 1,
‘‘Specification of the Safety Colors for
CIE Illuminate C and the CIE 1931, 2°
Standard Observer,’’ of ANSI Z535.1–
2006(R2011), incorporated by reference
in § 1910.6.
*
*
*
*
*
(4) Caution signs. The standard color
of the background shall be yellow; and
the panel, black with yellow letters. Any
letters used against the yellow
background shall be black. The colors
shall be those of opaque glossy samples
as specified in Table 1 of ANSI Z53.1–
1967 or Table 1 of ANSI Z535.1–
2006(R2011), incorporated by reference
in § 1910.6.
*
*
*
*
*
(6) Safety instruction signs. The
standard color of the background shall
be white; and the panel, green with
white letters. Any letters used against
the white background shall be black.
The colors shall be those of opaque
glossy samples as specified in Table 1
of ANSI Z53.1–1967 or in Table 1 of
ANSI Z535.1–2006(R2011),
incorporated by reference in § 1910.6.
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart R—[Amended]
7. Revise the authority citation for
subpart R of part 1910 to read as
follows:
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
■
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 653, 655, 657;
Secretary of Labor’s Order No. 12–71 (36 FR
8754), 8–76 (41 FR 25059), 9–83 (48 FR
35736), 1–90 (55 FR 9033), 6–96 (62 FR 111),
5–2007 (72 FR 31159)), 4–2010 (75 FR
55355), or 1–2012 (77 FR 3912), as
applicable; and 29 CFR part 1911.
8. Amend § 1910.261 by revising
paragraph (c)(16) to read as follows:
■
§ 1910.261
mills.
*
Pulp, paper, and paperboard
*
*
(c) * * *
VerDate Mar<15>2010
*
*
14:12 Jun 12, 2013
Jkt 229001
9. The authority citation for subpart A
of part 1926 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 333; 29 U.S.C. 653,
655, 657; Secretary of Labor’s Order No. 12–
71 (36 FR 8754), 8–76 (41 FR 25059), 9–83
(48 FR 35736), 6–96 (62 FR 111), 5–2007 (72
FR 31160), 4–2010 (75 FR 55355), or 1–2012
(77 FR 3912), as applicable; and 29 CFR part
1911.
10. Amend § 1926.6 as follows:
a. Revise paragraph (h)(24);
b. Redesignate paragraphs (h)(27)
through (h)(30) as (h)(31) through
(h)(34) and paragraph (u)(1) as (u)(2);
■ c. Add paragraphs (h)(27) through
(h)(30), and (u)(1); and
■ d. Revise newly redesignated
paragraph (u)(2).
■
■
■
§ 1926.6
Incorporation by reference.
*
*
*
*
*
(h) * * *
(24) ANSI Z35.1–1968, Specifications
for Accident Prevention Signs; IBR
approved for § 1926.200(b), (c), and 1 (i).
Copies available for purchase from the
IHS Standards Store, 15 Inverness Way
East, Englewood, CO 80112; telephone:
1–877–413–5184; Web site:
www.global.ihs.com.
*
*
*
*
*
(27) USA Z53.1–1967 (also referred to
as ANSI Z53.1–1967), Safety Color Code
for Marking Physical Hazards, ANSI
approved October 9, 1967; IBR approved
for § 1926.200(c). Copies available for
purchase from the IHS Standards Store,
15 Inverness Way East, Englewood, CO
80112; telephone: 1–877–413–5184;
Web site: www.global.ihs.com.
(28) ANSI Z535.1–2006(R2011),
Safety Colors, reaffirmed July 19, 2011;
IBR approved for § 1926.200(c). Copies
available for purchase from the
International Safety Equipment
Association, 1901 North Moore Street,
Arlington, VA 22209–1762; telephone:
703–525–1695; fax: 703–528–2148; Web
site: www.safetyequipment.org.
(29) ANSI Z535.2–2011,
Environmental and Facility Safety
Signs, published September 15, 2011;
IBR approved for § 1926.200(b), (c), and
(i). Copies available for purchase from
the International Safety Equipment
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Association, 1901 North Moore Street,
Arlington, VA 22209–1762; telephone:
703–525–1695; fax: 703–528–2148; Web
site: www.safetyequipment.org.
(30) ANSI Z535.5–2011, Safety Tags
and Barricade Tapes (for Temporary
Hazards), published September 15,
2011, including Errata, November 14,
2011; IBR approved for § 1926.200(h)
and (i). Copies available for purchase
from the International Safety Equipment
Association, 1901 North Moore Street,
Arlington, VA 22209–1762; telephone:
703–525–1695; fax: 703–528–2148; Web
site: www.safetyequipment.org.
*
*
*
*
*
(u) * * *
(1) Manual on Uniform Traffic Control
Devices (MUTCD), Part VI, Standards
and Guides for Traffic Controls for
Street and Highway Construction,
Maintenance, Utility, and Incident
Management Operation, 1988 Edition,
Revision 3, September 3, 1993; IBR
approved for §§ 1926.200(g),
1926.201(a), and 1926.202. Electronic
copies of the MUTCD, 1988 Edition,
Revision 3, are available for
downloading at https://www.osha.gov/
doc/highway_workzones/mutcd/
index.html.
(2) Manual on Uniform Traffic Control
Devices (MUTCD), Millennium Edition,
Dec. 2000; IBR approved for
§§ 1926.200(g)), 1926.201(a), and
1926.202. Electronic copies of the
MUTCD 2000 are available for
downloading at https://
mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/knomillennium_12.18.00.htm.
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart G—[Amended]
11. Revise the authority citation for
subpart G of part 1926 to read as
follows:
■
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 333; 29 U.S.C. 653,
655, 657; Secretary of Labor’s Order No. 12–
71 (36 FR 8754), 8–76 (41 FR 25059), 9–83
(48 FR 35736), 3–2000 (65 FR 50017), 5–2002
(67 FR 65008), 5–2007 (72 FR 31159), 4–2010
(75 FR 55355), or 1–2012 (77 FR 3912), as
applicable; and 29 CFR part 1911.
12. Amend § 1926.200 by revising
paragraphs (b)(1), (c)(1), (c)(3), (g)(2),
(h)(2), and (i) to read as follows:
■
§ 1926.200
tags.
Accident prevention signs and
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Danger signs. (1) Danger signs
shall be used only where an immediate
hazard exists, and shall follow the
specifications provided in Figure 1 of
ANSI Z35.1–1968 or in Figure 2 of ANSI
Z535.2–2011, incorporated by reference
in § 1926.6.
*
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 114 / Thursday, June 13, 2013 / Proposed Rules
(c) Caution signs. (1) Caution signs
shall be used only to warn against
potential hazards or to caution against
unsafe practices, and shall follow the
specifications provided in Figure 4 of
ANSI Z35.1–1968 or in Figure 2 of ANSI
Z535.2–2011, incorporated by reference
for the sections specified in § 1926.6.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) The standard color of the
background shall be yellow; and the
panel, black with yellow letters. Any
letters used against the yellow
background shall be black. The colors
shall be those of opaque glossy samples
as specified in Table 1 of ANSI Z53.1–
1967 or in Table 1 of ANSI Z535.1–
2006(R2011), incorporated by reference
in § 1926.6.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) * * *
(2) All traffic control signs or devices
used for protection of construction
workers shall conform to Part VI of the
MUTCD, 1988 Edition, Revision 3, or
Part VI of the MUTCD, Millennium
Edition, incorporated by reference in
§ 1926.6.
(h) * * *
(2) For accident prevention tags,
employers shall follow specifications
that are similar to those in Figures 1 to
4 of ANSI Z35.2–1968 or Figures 1 to 8
of ANSI Z535.5–2011, incorporated by
reference in § 1926.6.
(i) Additional rules. ANSI Z35.1–
1968, ANSI Z535.2–2011, ANSI Z35.2–
1968, and ANSI Z535.5–2011,
incorporated by reference in § 1926.6,
contain rules in addition to those
specifically prescribed in this subpart.
The employer shall comply with ANSI
Z35.1–1968 or ANSI Z535.2–2011, and
ANSI Z35.2–1968 or Z535.5–2011, with
respect to such additional rules.
■ 13. Amend § 1926.201 by revising
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 1926.201
Signaling.
(a) Flaggers. Signaling by flaggers and
the use of flaggers, including warning
garments worn by flaggers, shall
conform to Part VI of the Manual on
Uniform Traffic Control Devices (1988
Edition, Revision 3, or the Millennium
Edition), incorporated by reference in
§ 1926.6.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 14. Revise § 1926.202 to read as
follows:
§ 1926.202
Barricades.
Barricades for protection of
employees shall conform to Part VI of
the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control
Devices (1988 Edition, Revision 3, or the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:12 Jun 12, 2013
Jkt 229001
Millennium Edition), incorporated by
reference in § 1926.6.
[FR Doc. 2013–13910 Filed 6–12–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–26–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket Number USCG–2013–0295]
RIN 1625–AA08
Special Local Regulation; Christmas
Boat Parade, San Juan Harbor; San
Juan, PR
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is proposes
to establish a special local regulation on
the waters of San Juan Harbor in San
Juan, Puerto Rico during the Christmas
Boat Parade, a Boat Parade. The event is
scheduled to take place on Saturday,
December 14, 2013. Approximately 35
boats are anticipated to participate in
the Boat Parade, and no spectator
vessels are anticipated to be present
during the event. The special local
regulation is necessary to provide for
the safety of life on the navigable waters
of the United States during the event.
The special local regulation establishes
a Parade Route, where all persons and
vessels, except those persons and
vessels who are participating in the
parade, will be prohibited from
entering, transiting through, anchoring
in, or remaining within unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
San Juan or a designated representative.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before July 15, 2013.
Requests for public meetings must be
received by the Coast Guard on or before
June 20, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number using any
one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590–0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. The telephone number is 202–
366–9329.
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
35593
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for further instructions on
submitting comments. To avoid
duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Mr. Efrain Lopez, Sector San Juan
Prevention Department, Coast Guard;
telephone (787) 289–2097, email
efrain.lopez1@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Barbara
Hairston, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone (202) 366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section
of this document to which each
comment applies, and provide a reason
for each suggestion or recommendation.
You may submit your comments and
material online at https://
www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you
successfully transmit the comment. If
you fax, hand deliver, or mail your
comment, it will be considered as
having been received by the Coast
Guard when it is received at the Docket
Management Facility. We recommend
that you include your name and a
mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your
document so that we can contact you if
we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number USCG–2013–0295 in the
‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click ‘‘SEARCH.’’
Click on ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ on the
line associated with this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail
or hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 114 (Thursday, June 13, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 35585-35593]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-13910]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health Administration
29 CFR Parts 1910 and 1926
[Docket No. OSHA-2013-0005]
RIN 1218-AC77
Updating OSHA Standards Based on National Consensus Standards;
Signage
AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA),
Department of Labor.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (``OSHA'' or
``the Agency'') proposes to update its general industry and
construction signage standards by adding references to the latest
versions of the American National Standards Institute (``ANSI'')
standards on specifications for accident prevention signs and tags,
ANSI Z535.1-2006(R2011), Z535.2-2011, and Z535.5-2011. OSHA also is
proposing to retain the existing references to the earlier ANSI
standards, ANSI Z53.1-1967, Z35.1-1968, and Z35.2-1968, in its signage
standards, thereby providing employers an option to comply with the
updated or earlier standards. In addition, OSHA is proposing to
incorporate by reference Part VI of the Manual of Uniform Traffic
Control Devices (``MUTCD''), 1988 Edition, Revision 3, into the
incorporation-by-reference section of the construction standards,
having inadvertently omitted this edition of the MUTCD from this
[[Page 35586]]
section during an earlier rulemaking, and amend citations in two
provisions of the construction standards to show the correct
incorporation-by-reference section. In addition, OSHA is publishing a
direct final rule in today's Federal Register adding the same
references.
DATES: Submit comments on this proposed rule (including comments on the
information-collection (paperwork) determination described under the
section titled Procedural Determinations, hearing requests, and other
information by July 15, 2013. All submissions must bear a postmark or
provide other evidence of the submission date (the following section
titled ADDRESSES describes the available methods of making
submissions).
ADDRESSES: Submit comments, hearing requests, and other information as
follows:
Electronic. Submit comments electronically to https://www.regulations.gov, which is the Federal eRulemaking Portal. Follow
the instructions online for submitting comments.
Facsimile. OSHA allows facsimile transmission of comments
and hearing requests that are 10 pages or fewer in length (including
attachments). Send these documents to the OSHA Docket Office at (202)
693-1648; OSHA does not require hard copies of these documents. Instead
of transmitting facsimile copies of attachments that supplement these
documents (e.g., studies, journal articles), commenters must submit
these attachments to the OSHA Docket Office, Technical Data Center,
Room N-2625, OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20210. These attachments must clearly identify the
sender's name, date, subject, and docket number (i.e., OSHA-2013-0005)
so that the Agency can attach them to the appropriate document.
Regular mail, express delivery, hand delivery, and
messenger (courier) service. Submit comments and any additional
material (e.g., studies, journal articles) to the OSHA Docket Office,
Docket No. OSHA-2013-0005 or RIN 1218-AC77, Technical Data Center, Room
N-2625, OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20210; telephone: (202) 693-2350. (OSHA's TTY number is
(877) 889-5627.) Note that security procedures may result in
significant delays in receiving comments and other written materials by
regular mail. Contact the OSHA Docket Office for information about
security procedures for delivery of materials by express delivery, hand
delivery, and messenger service. The hours of operation for the OSHA
Docket Office are 8:15 a.m. to 4:45 p.m., e.t.
Instructions. All submissions must include the Agency name
and the OSHA docket number (i.e., OSHA Docket No. OSHA-2013-0005). OSHA
will place comments and other material, including any personal
information, in the public docket without revision, and these materials
will be available online at https://www.regulations.gov. Therefore, the
Agency cautions commenters about submitting statements they do not want
made public, or submitting comments that contain personal information
(either about themselves or others) such as Social Security numbers,
birth dates, and medical data.
OSHA invites comment on all issues related to this proposed rule.
The Agency also welcomes comments on its findings that this proposed
rule would have no negative economic, paperwork, or other regulatory
impact on the regulated community. This proposed rule is the companion
document of a direct final rule published in the ``Rules'' section of
today's Federal Register. If OSHA receives no significant adverse
comments on the proposed rule or direct final rule, the Agency will
publish a Federal Register notice confirming the effective date of the
final rule and withdrawing this companion proposed rule. The final rule
may include minor stylistic or technical corrections of the direct
final rule. For the purpose of judicial review, OSHA considers the date
that the Agency confirms the effective date of the final rule to be the
date of issuance. If, however, OSHA receives any significant adverse
comments on the direct final rule or this proposal, the Agency will
publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule and proceed with
this proposed rule, which addresses the same revisions of its signage
standards.
Docket. The electronic docket for this proposed rule
established at https://www.regulations.gov lists most of the documents
in the docket. Some information (e.g., copyrighted material), however,
cannot be read or downloaded through this Web site. All submissions,
including copyrighted material, are accessible at the OSHA Docket
Office. Contact the OSHA Docket Office for assistance in locating
docket submissions.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
General information and press inquiries: Contact Frank Meilinger,
OSHA, Office of Communications, Room N-3647, U.S. Department of Labor,
200 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20210; telephone: (202) 693-
1999.
Technical inquiries: Contact Kenneth Stevanus, Directorate of
Standards and Guidance, Room N-3609, OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor,
200 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20210; telephone: (202) 693-
2260; fax: (202) 693-1663.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Copies of this Federal Register notice. Electronic copies of this
Federal Register notice are available at https://www.regulations.gov.
This Federal Register notice, as well as news releases and other
relevant information, also are available at OSHA's Web page at https://www.osha.gov.
Table of Contents
I. Direct Final Rulemaking
II. Background
III. Summary and Explanation of Revisions to the Signage Standards
IV. Procedural Determinations
A. Legal Considerations
B. Preliminary Economic Analysis and Regulatory Flexibility Act
Certification
C. OMB Review Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
D. Federalism
E. State-Plan States
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
G. Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments
H. Consultation with the Advisory Committee on Construction
Safety and Health
V. Authority and Signature
I. Direct Final Rulemaking
In a direct final rulemaking, an agency publishes a direct final
rule in the Federal Register along with a statement that the rule will
become effective unless the agency receives any significant adverse
comments within a specified period. The agency also publishes
concurrently with the direct final rule an identical proposed rule. If
the agency receives no significant adverse comments, the direct final
rule will become effective. However, should the agency receive any
significant adverse comments, the agency will withdraw the direct final
rule and treat the comments as submissions on the proposed rule.
OSHA uses direct final rules to update existing consensus standards
when it expects the rulemaking to be noncontroversial; when the rule
provides protection to employees that is at least equivalent to the
protection afforded to them by the previous standard-development
organization standard; and when the rule imposes no significant new
compliance costs on employers (69 FR 68283, 68285 (2004)). OSHA used
direct final rules previously
[[Page 35587]]
to update or, when appropriate, revoke references to previous national
consensus standards in OSHA rules (see, e.g., 69 FR 68283 (2004); 70 FR
76979 (2006); 76 FR 75782 (2011); and 77 FR 37587 (2012)).
For the purposes of a direct final rule, a significant adverse
comment is one that ``explains why the rule would be inappropriate,
including challenges to the rule's underlying premise or approach, or
why it would be ineffective or unacceptable without a change'' (see 60
FR 43108, 43111(1995)). In determining whether a comment necessitates
withdrawal of the direct final rule, OSHA will consider whether the
comment raises an issue serious enough to warrant a substantive
response in a notice-and-comment process. OSHA will not consider a
comment recommending additional revisions to a rule to be a significant
adverse comment unless the comment states why the direct final rule
would be ineffective without the revisions. If OSHA receives a timely
significant adverse comment, it will publish a Federal Register notice
withdrawing the direct final rule no later than 90 days after the
publication date of this current notice.
This notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) furthers the objectives
of Executive Order 13563, which requires that the regulatory process
``promote predictability and reduce uncertainty'' and ``identify and
use the best, most innovative and least burdensome tools for achieving
regulatory ends.'' As described below, the revisions will make the
requirements of OSHA's signage standards consistent with the most
recent national consensus standards, thereby increasing employers'
compliance flexibility without compromising employee safety (for the
purposes of this rulemaking, the term ``signage standards'' refers to
standards that regulate both signs and tags). Accordingly, the Agency
concludes that updating the references to the national consensus
standards in its signage standards is consistent with, and promotes the
objectives of, Executive Order 13563.
II. Background
In June 2009, the National Electrical Manufacturers Association
(NEMA) contacted OSHA and, based on a letter from ANSI, requested that
the Agency add references to the latest versions of ANSI's Z535 series
of standards to OSHA's signage standards. Letter dated June 2, 2009,
from Kyle Pitsor, Vice President, Government Relations, NEMA, to
Richard Fairfax, Director, Directorate of Enforcement Programs, OSHA
(Ex. OSHA-2013-0005-0003, p. 1), attaching a letter dated May 28, 2009,
from Geoffrey Peckham, Chair, ANSI Z535.2 Subcommittee, to Mr. Fairfax
(Ex. OSHA-2013-0005-0003, p. 3). NEMA specifically advocated
incorporating by reference ANSI Z535.2, ``Environmental and Facility
Safety Signs,'' in OSHA standards that refer to old \1\ versions of
this ANSI standard. Pitsor letter (Ex. OSHA-2013-0005-0003, p. 1);
accord Peckham letter (Ex. OSHA-2013-0005-0003, p. 3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The terms ``old'' and ``older,'' as used in this Federal
Register notice, refer specifically to signs or tags that comply
with ANSI Z53.1-1967, Z35.1-1968, and Z35.2-1968.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Over the next few years, OSHA staff met with NEMA several times to
discuss the association's request that OSHA adopt ANSI's Z535 series of
standards. Besides urging OSHA to incorporate ANSI Z535.2 by reference,
NEMA also asked the Agency to update its standards' references to ANSI
Z53.1-67, ``Safety Color Code for Marking Physical Hazards and the
Identification of Certain Equipment,'' by citing the current version of
this standard, ANSI Z535.1, ``Safety Colors.'' As a result of these
meetings and as recorded in a second letter to OSHA, NEMA provided the
Agency with side-by-side comparisons of ANSI Z35.1-68, Z535.2-2007, and
Z535.2-2011, and ANSI Z53.1-67, Z535.1-2006, and Z535.1-2006(R2011),
and other relevant materials such as signs, which OSHA evaluated.
Letter dated March 30, 2011, from Evan Gaddis, President and CEO, NEMA,
to Dr. David Michaels, Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational
Safety and Health; Side-by-Side Comparisons of ANSI standards; NEMA
Signage Materials (Exs. OSHA-2013-0005-0004 through -0006). OSHA also
subsequently considered whether it should also incorporate by reference
ANSI Z535.5, ``Safety Tags and Barricade Tapes (for Temporary
Hazards),'' into those OSHA standards that refer to a much older
version of this ANSI standard.
At present, employers continue to use the old signs and tags not
only because they are long-lasting and rarely need replacing, but also
because they comply with OSHA's current signage standards, which
incorporate the old ANSI standards by reference. Both NEMA and ANSI
contend that incorporating the new ANSI standards by reference is
necessary to encourage employers to buy and use signs and tags that
comply with these standards without receiving a de minimis notice for
failure to comply with the old ANSI standards.\2\ Pitsor letter (Ex.
OSHA-2013-0005-0003, p. 1); Peckham letter (Ex. OSHA-2013-0005-0003, p.
3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ According to OSHA's Field Operations Manual (FOM), a de
minimis condition occurs when ``[a]n employer has implemented a
measure different than the one specified in a standard, that has no
direct or immediate relationship to safety or health.'' FOM, CPL 02-
00-150, Ch. 4, Sec. VIII, pp. 4-36 to 4-37 (Apr. 22, 2011),
available on OSHA's Web page. OSHA issues no citations or penalties
for these conditions, but compliance officers will document the
condition during an inspection. Id. at 4-36. See, also, Letter of
Interpretation dated February 22, 2011, from Thomas Galassi,
Director, Directorate of Enforcement Programs, OSHA, to Richard A.
Eichel, ATA Safety, describing OSHA's de minimis enforcement policy
with regard to ANSI signs; available at https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=INTERPRETATIONS&p_id=27641.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
NEMA and ANSI further assert that signs and tags meeting the latest
version of the ANSI standards, the Z535 series, provide an equal or
greater level of protection than the currently required signs that
comply with the old ANSI standards, Z35.1, Z35.2, and Z53.1, cited in
OSHA's standards. Pitsor letter (Ex. OSHA-2013-0005-0003, p. 1);
Peckham letter (Ex. OSHA-2013-0005-0003, p. 3). In its letter, ANSI
provides an exhibit demonstrating why it believes the new Z535.2-2007
signs are at least as protective as the old Z35.1 signs (Peckham
letter, Ex. OSHA-2013-0005-0003, p. 10 (Peckham's Ex. 6).\3\ The
exhibit, which compares the information contained in the two sets of
signs, shows that the new Z535.2 signs typically have at least as much
information as the old, Z35.1, signs. Moreover, the new ANSI safety-
color standard, ANSI Z535.1-2006(2011), includes two safety colors,
brown and gray, that were not in Z53.1-1967. See ANSI Z535.1-
2006(2011), pp. v-vi (ANSI also added safety blue in the 1979 revision
after deleting this color in the 1971 revision).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ This exhibit is actually Exhibit 6 of the Peckham letter,
but is mislabeled as Exhibit 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ANSI and NEMA also claim that the new signs provide additional
information, including the specific identity of the hazard, a
description of how serious the hazard is, how to avoid the hazard, and
the probable consequences of not avoiding the hazard. Peckham letter
(Exs. OSHA-2013-0005-0003, pp. 7-9, and OSHA-2013-0005-0006, pp. 9-11).
ANSI further argues that the old sign formats ``lack the ability to
contain [the] symbols, more extensive word messages, multiple messages,
and additional languages'' necessary to communicate critical safety
information to an increasingly multicultural work force. Id., pp. 6 and
9-10. NEMA also submitted an ANSI timeline of the institute's
standards, and the safety signs that complied with those
[[Page 35588]]
standards, for the years 1914 to 2011; this timeline illustrates
additions made to the information contained in these signs during this
period. NEMA Signage Materials, pp. 6-8 (Ex. OSHA-2013-0005-0006).
Based on the available record, OSHA believes that the new signs are at
least as protective as the old ones. Therefore, this NPRM is proposing
to incorporate the ANSI Z535 series by reference in the applicable OSHA
signage standards so that employers will be able to buy and use the new
signs without the prospect of receiving de minimis notices for using
noncompliant signs. OSHA invites the public to comment on its
conclusion that the new signs are as effective as the old ones.
III. Summary and Explanation of Revisions to the Signage Standards
As discussed in a previous Federal Register notice (69 FR 68283
(2004)), OSHA is undertaking a series of projects to update its
standards to incorporate the latest versions of national consensus and
industry standards. These projects include updating or removing
national consensus and industry standards cited in existing OSHA
standards, updating the text of standards that OSHA adopted directly
from previous national consensus standards, and, when appropriate,
replacing specific references to previous national consensus and
industry standards with performance requirements.
This NPRM proposes to update the references to ANSI consensus
standards in four provisions of OSHA's general industry and
construction standards: 29 CFR 1910.97, Nonionizing radiation; Sec.
1910.145, Specifications for accident prevention signs and tags; Sec.
1910.261, Pulp, paper, and paper board mills; and Sec. 1926.200,
Accident prevention signs and tags. These provisions incorporate by
reference ANSI consensus standards Z53.1-1967, ``Safety Color Code for
Marking Physical Hazards and the Identification of Certain Equipment'';
Z35.1-1968, ``Specifications for Accident Prevention Signs''; and
Z35.2-1968, ``Specifications for Accident Prevention Tags.'' The NPRM
would allow employers to comply with either these ANSI standards or the
latest versions of them, Z535.1-2006(R2011), Z535.2-2011, and Z535.5-
2011. The latter compliance option would allow employers to update
their signage based on the newest ANSI consensus standards without
violating OSHA's requirements. In addition, since employers would not
have to update their signage, there would be no additional compliance
cost or burden resulting from this rulemaking. The NPRM would revise
the above four provisions in the following ways:
(1) OSHA's general industry standard on nonionizing radiation at
Sec. 1910.97(a)(3)(ii) requires employers to use the color
specification provided by ANSI 53.1-1953, ``Safety Color Code for
Marking Physical Hazards,'' which OSHA incorporated by reference under
Sec. 1910.6 in 1974 (39 FR 23502 (1974)). Currently, Sec. 1910.6
refers to ANSI Z53.1-1967, ``Safety Color Code for Marking Physical
Hazards and the Identification of Certain Equipment'' because, on March
7, 1996, OSHA incorporated ANSI Z53.1-1967 by reference under Sec.
1910.6 without revising the reference to ANSI Z53.1-1953 in Sec.
1910.97(a)(3)(ii) (see 61 FR 9228, 9232 (1996)). In addition, OSHA did
not obtain approval from the Office of the Federal Register during the
1996 rulemaking to incorporate ANSI Z53.1-1967 by reference under Sec.
1910.6. With this NPRM, OSHA would correct this oversight by
incorporating ANSI Z53.1-1967 by reference under Sec. 1910.6 after
obtaining approval to do so from the Office of the Federal Register. In
addition, this NPRM would update the nonionizing radiation provision by
incorporating ANSI Z535.1-2006(R2011), ``Safety Colors,'' by reference.
This addition would allow employers to comply with the 1967 version or
the 2006(R2011) version of the cited ANSI standard.
(2) OSHA's general industry standard on specifications for
accident-prevention signs and tags at Sec. 1910.145 refers to ANSI
standard Z53.1-1967, ``Safety Colors for Marking Physical Hazards and
the Identification of Certain Equipment,'' which Sec. 1910.6
incorporated by reference in three places: Sec. Sec. 1910.145(d)(2),
Danger signs; 1910.145(d)(4), Caution signs; and 1910.145(d)(6), Safety
instruction signs. However, as noted above, the Office of the Federal
Register did not approve ANSI Z53.1-1967 for incorporation by reference
under Sec. 1910.6. Therefore, this NPRM would correct this oversight
by incorporating that ANSI standard by reference under Sec. 1910.6
after receiving approval from the Office of the Federal Register to do
so.
Each of the three cited provisions of Sec. 1910.145(d) specifies
the colors employers must use for each type of sign, and requires that
the signs meet the specifications in Table 1, ``Fundamental
Specification of Safety Colors for CIE Standard Source `C,' '' of ANSI
Z53.1-1967. The NPRM would update each of these sections by referencing
Table 1, ``Specification of the Safety Colors for CIE Illuminate C and
the CIE 1931, 2[deg] Standard Observer,'' of ANSI Z535.1-2006(R2011),
``Safety Colors,'' which it incorporates by reference. This addition
would allow employers to comply with the 1967 version or the
2006(R2011) version of the cited ANSI standard.
(3) OSHA's general industry standard on pulp, paper, and paper
board mills at Sec. 1910.261 refers to ANSI Z35.1-1968,
``Specifications for Accident Prevention Signs,'' which Sec.
1910.6(e)(59) incorporates by reference in two places. First, Sec.
1910.261(c)(16) refers to this 1968 ANSI standard. The NPRM would
update Sec. 1910.261(c)(16) by incorporating ANSI Z535.2-2011,
``Environmental and Facility Safety Signs,'' by reference in Sec.
1910.6(e)(60). This addition would allow employers to comply with the
1968 version or the 2011 version of the cited ANSI standard.
Second, Sec. 1910.6(e)(59) incorporates Z35.1-1968,
``Specifications for Accident Prevention Signs,'' by reference in Sec.
1910.261(a)(3)(xxiv). However, on June 18, 1998, as part of an OSHA
rulemaking, the Agency removed subsection Sec. 1910.261(a)(3)(xxiv)
from the pulp, paper, and paper board mills standard, but did not
remove the reference to Sec. 1910.261(a)(3)(xxiv) in Sec.
1910.6(e)(59). The NPRM would correct this oversight.
(4) OSHA's construction standard on accident prevention signs and
tags, Sec. 1926.200, refers to ANSI standards Z35.1-1968,
``Specifications for Accident Prevention Signs''; Z35.2-1968,
``Specifications for Accident Prevention Tags''; or Z53.1-1967,
``Safety Color Code for Marking Physical Hazards and the Identification
of Certain Equipment,'' in five places discussed below.\4\ In addition,
as discussed below, Sec. 1926.200 would incorporate by reference Part
VI of the MUTCD, 1988 Edition, Revision 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Although Sec. 1926.200(c)(3) currently refers to ANSI
Z53.1-1967, OSHA did not incorporate that ANSI standard by reference
under Sec. 1926.6. This NPRM, therefore, would correct this
oversight by incorporating ANSI Z53.1-1967 by reference under Sec.
1926.6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The first reference to one of these old ANSI standards is in Sec.
1926.200(b)(1), Danger signs, which refers to Figure G-1, which is
identical to Figure 1 in ANSI Z35.1-1968, ``Specifications for Accident
Prevention Signs.'' The second reference is in Sec. 1926.200(c)(1),
Caution signs, which refers to Figure G-2, which is identical to Figure
4 in the same ANSI standard. The NPRM would remove Figures G-1 and G-2
from Sec. 1926.200(b)(1) and (c)(1), and update these provisions by
referencing the appropriate figures from ANSI Z35.1-1968 and ANSI
Z535.2-2011, ``Environmental and Facility Safety
[[Page 35589]]
Signs.'' These revisions, therefore, would give employers the option of
using the figures from either ANSI standard.
The third reference to an old ANSI standard is in Sec.
1926.200(c)(3), which refers to ANSI Z53.1-1967, ``Safety Color Code
for Marking Physical Hazards and the Identification of Certain
Equipment.'' This OSHA provision specifies the colors employers must
use in caution signs, and requires that the signs meet the
specifications in Table 1 of ANSI Z53.1-1967. This NPRM would update
Sec. 1926.200(c)(3) by adding a reference to Table 1 of ANSI Z535.1-
2006(R2011), ``Safety Colors,'' the latest version of Z53.1-1967. This
addition, therefore, would allow employers to use either Table 1 of
Z53.1-1967 or Table 1 of Z535.1-2006(R2011).
The fourth reference to an old ANSI standard is in Sec.
1926.200(h)(2), Accident prevention tags, which says that
specifications for accident-prevention tags similar to the
specifications in Table G-1 apply; OSHA based Table G-1 on Figures 1 to
4 in ANSI Z35.2-1968, ``Specifications for Accident Prevention Tags.''
The NPRM would remove Table G-1 from Sec. 1926.200(h)(2), and update
this provision by referencing Figures 1 to 4 of ANSI Z35.2-1968 and
Figures 1 to 8 of Z535.5-2011, ``Safety Tags and Barricade Tapes (for
Temporary Hazards).'' These revisions, therefore, would give employers
the option of using the figures from either ANSI standard.
The fifth reference to the old ANSI standards is in Sec.
1926.200(i), which refers to ANSI Z35.1-1968, ``Specifications for
Accident Prevention Signs,'' and Z35.2-1968, ``Specifications for
Accident Prevention Tags.'' Section 1926.200(i) requires employers to
follow these two ANSI standards with respect to OSHA rules not
specifically prescribed in 29 CFR 1926, subpart G. This NPRM would
update Sec. 1926.200(i) by adding Z535.2-2011, ``Environmental and
Facility Safety Signs,'' and Z535.5-2011, ``Safety Tags and Barricade
Tapes (for Temporary Hazards),'' the latest versions of the cited ANSI
standards, as references. These additions would allow employers to
comply with Z35.1-1968 or Z535.2-11 for signs, and Z35.2-1968 or
Z535.5-11 for tags.
This NPRM also would update paragraph (g)(2) of Sec. 1926.200 by
removing the language referring to the Director of the Federal
Register's approval for incorporation by reference of Part VI of the
1988 Edition, Revision 3, of the MUTCD, and adding a reference to Sec.
1926.6 instead (i.e., this reference indicates such approval).
Additionally, in an earlier rulemaking (see 75 FR 47906, 48132 (2010)),
OSHA inadvertently removed Part VI of the MUTCD from Sec. 1926.6. This
NPRM would correct this oversight by returning the reference to Part VI
of the MUTCD to Sec. 1926.6; it also would remove the reference to
Sec. 1926.200(g)(2) as the incorporation-by-reference provision in
Sec. 1926.201(a) and Sec. 1926.202, and replace it with a reference
to Sec. 1926.6.
In summary, OSHA believes, based on the discussion above under
Background, that many general industry and construction employers
currently comply with the ANSI signage requirements incorporated by
reference in its existing signage standards, i.e., ANSI Z35.1-1968,
Z35.2-1968, and Z53.1-1967. Therefore, OSHA is proposing to retain
these requirements in its signage standards. OSHA also determined that
the latest editions of the ANSI signage standards, i.e., Z535.1-
2006(R2011), Z535.2-2011, and Z535.5-2011, provide at least as
effective protection to employees as the old ANSI standards
incorporated by reference in the Agency's signage standards.
Accordingly, this NPRM would give employers the option of complying
with the old or the new ANSI standards. Since employers could choose to
comply with OSHA's existing signage standards, incorporating the new
ANSI standards by reference would not increase the cost or burden of
compliance.
IV. Procedural Determinations
A. Legal Considerations
The purpose of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (OSH
Act), 29 U.S.C. 65-78, is to assure, as far as possible, safe and
healthful working conditions for all employees. 29 U.S.C. 651(b). To
achieve this goal, Congress authorized the Secretary of Labor to
promulgate and enforce occupational safety and health standards. 29
U.S.C. 654(b), 655(b). A safety or health standard is a standard that
``requires conditions, or the adoption or use of one or more practices,
means, methods, operations, or processes reasonably necessary or
appropriate to provide safe or healthful employment and places of
employment.'' 29 U.S.C. 652(8). A standard is reasonably necessary or
appropriate within the meaning of Section 652(8) of the OSH Act when a
significant risk of material harm exists in the workplace and the
proposed standard would substantially reduce or eliminate that
workplace risk. See Industrial Union Department, AFL-CIO v. American
Petroleum Institute, 448 U.S. 607 (1980). OSHA has already determined
that requirements specified by signage standards, including design
requirements, are reasonably necessary or appropriate within the
meaning of Section 652(8) (see, e.g., 49 FR 49726, 49737 (1978); 51 FR
33251, 33251-33259 (1986)).
This NPRM would neither reduce employee protection nor alter an
employer's obligations under the existing standards. Under this NPRM,
employers would be able to continue to use the same signs and tags they
are using currently to meet their compliance obligations under the
existing standards' design-criteria requirements. This NPRM would
provide employers with additional options for meeting the design-
criteria requirements for signage protection. Therefore, this NPRM
would not alter the substantive protection that employers must provide
to employees or impose a new compliance burden on employers.
Accordingly, OSHA need not, in this rulemaking, determine significant
risk or the extent to which this NPRM would reduce that risk, as
typically required by Industrial Union Department.
B. Preliminary Economic Analysis and Regulatory Flexibility Act
Certification
This NPRM is not economically significant within the context of
Executive Order 12866, or a major rule under the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act or Section 801 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act. In addition, this NPRM complies with Executive Order
13563. The rulemaking imposes no additional costs on any private-sector
or public-sector entity, and does not meet any of the criteria for an
economically significant or major rule specified by the Executive Order
or relevant statutes.
This rulemaking would allow employers increased flexibility in
choosing signage for the protection of their employees. This NPRM,
however, would not require an employer to update or replace its signage
solely as a result of this rule if the employer's current signage
protection meets the revised standards. Because the NPRM imposes no
costs, OSHA certifies that it would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
C. OMB Review Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This rulemaking does not impose new information-collection
requirements for purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44
U.S.C. 3501-30.
[[Page 35590]]
Accordingly, the Agency does not have to prepare an Information
Collection Request in association with this rulemaking.
Members of the public may respond to this paperwork determination
by sending their written comments to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Attn: OSHA Desk Officer (RIN 1218-AC77), Office of
Management and Budget, Room 10235, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC
20503. The Agency encourages commenters to submit these comments to the
rulemaking docket, along with their comments on other parts of this
NPRM. For instructions on submitting these comments and accessing the
docket, see the sections of this Federal Register notice titled DATES
and ADDRESSES. OSHA, however, will not consider any comment received on
this paperwork determination to be a ``significant adverse comment'' as
specified above under the section titled Direct Final Rulemaking.
To make inquiries, or to request other information, contact Mr.
Todd Owen, Directorate of Standards and Guidance, OSHA, Room N-3609,
U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC
20210; telephone (202) 693-2222.
D. Federalism
OSHA reviewed this NPRM in accordance with the Executive Order on
Federalism (Executive Order 13132, 64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999), which
requires that agencies, to the extent possible, refrain from limiting
state policy options, consult with states prior to taking any actions
that would restrict state policy options, and take such actions only
when clear constitutional authority exists and the problem is national
in scope. Executive Order 13132 provides for preemption of state law
only with the expressed consent of Congress. Agencies must limit any
such preemption to the extent possible.
Under Section 18 of the OSH Act, 29 U.S.C. 667, Congress expressly
provides that states may adopt, with Federal approval, a plan for the
development and enforcement of occupational safety and health standards
(29 U.S.C. 667); OSHA refers to states that obtain Federal approval for
such a plan as ``State-Plan states.'' Occupational safety and health
standards developed by State-Plan states must be at least as effective
in providing safe and healthful employment and places of employment as
the Federal standards. Subject to these requirements, State-Plan states
are free to develop and enforce under state law their own requirements
for occupational safety and health standards.
While OSHA drafted this NPRM to protect employees in every state,
Section 18(c)(2) of the OSH Act permits State-Plan states and U.S.
territories to develop and enforce their own standards for signage
protection provided these requirements are at least as effective in
providing safe and healthful employment and places of employment as the
requirements specified in this NPRM.
In summary, this NPRM complies with Executive Order 13132. In
states without OSHA-approved state plans, this rulemaking limits state
policy options in the same manner as other OSHA standards. In State-
Plan states, this rulemaking does not significantly limit state policy
options because, as explained in the following section, State-Plan
states do not have to adopt any final standard developed from this
NPRM.
E. State-Plan States
When Federal OSHA promulgates a new standard or amends an existing
standard to make it more stringent, the 27 states or U.S. territories
with their own OSHA-approved occupational safety and health plans must
revise their standards to reflect the new standard or amendment, or
show OSHA why such action is unnecessary, e.g., because an existing
state standard covering this area is at least as effective in
protecting workers as the new Federal standard or amendment. 29 CFR
1953.5(a). In this regard, the state standard must be at least as
effective as the final Federal rule. State-Plan states must adopt the
Federal standard or complete their own standard within six months of
the publication date of the final Federal rule. When OSHA promulgates a
new standard or amendment that does not impose additional or more
stringent requirements than the existing standard, State-Plan states
need not amend their standards, although OSHA may encourage them to do
so. The following 21 states and 1 U.S. territory have OSHA-approved
occupational safety and health plans that apply only to private-sector
employers: Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Indiana, Iowa,
Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, North
Carolina, Oregon, Puerto Rico, South Carolina, Tennessee, Utah,
Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and Wyoming. In addition, Connecticut,
Illinois, New Jersey, New York, and the Virgin Islands have OSHA-
approved state plans that apply only to state and local government
employees.
This NPRM would not impose any additional or more stringent
requirements on employers compared to existing OSHA standards. This
NPRM proposes to incorporate by reference three recent editions of the
applicable national consensus standards in OSHA's existing signage
protection standards. This NPRM would not require employers to update
or replace their signage solely as a result of this rulemaking if their
current signage meets the requirements of this NPRM. OSHA believes that
adding the new references to ANSI Z535.1-2006(R2011), ANSI Z535.2-2011,
and ANSI Z535.5-2011, while retaining the current references to ANSI
Z35.1-1968, Z35.2-1968, and Z53.1-1967, would impose no additional
compliance obligations on employers because employers can continue
using their existing signage and, when necessary, update their signage
and not be out of compliance.
Therefore, this NPRM does not require action under 29 CFR
1953.5(a), and State-Plan states do not need to adopt this rule or show
OSHA why such action is unnecessary. However, to the extent these
State-Plan states have the same standards as the OSHA standards
affected by this NPRM, OSHA encourages them to adopt the amendments
that may result from this rulemaking.
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
OSHA reviewed this NPRM according to the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1995 (UMRA), 2 U.S.C. 1501-1571, and Executive Order 12875, 58
FR 58093 (1993). 75 FR 48130; 2010. As discussed above in Section IV.B
(``Final Economic Analysis and Regulatory Flexibility Certification'')
of this preamble, OSHA determined that this NPRM imposes no additional
costs on any private-sector or public-sector entity. Accordingly, this
NPRM requires no additional expenditures by either public or private
employers.
As noted above under Section IV.E (``State-Plan States'') of this
preamble, OSHA standards do not apply to state or local governments
except in states that elected voluntarily to adopt an OSHA-approved
state plan. Consequently, this NPRM does not meet the definition of a
``Federal intergovernmental mandate'' (see Section 421(5) of the UMRA,
2 U.S.C. 658(5)). Therefore, for the purposes of the UMRA, OSHA
certifies that this NPRM does not mandate that state, local, or tribal
governments adopt new, unfunded regulatory obligations, or increase
expenditures by the private sector of more than $100 million in any
year.
[[Page 35591]]
G. Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments
OSHA reviewed this NPRM in accordance with Executive Order 13175,
65 FR 67249 (2000), and determined that it does not have ``tribal
implications'' as defined in that order. This NPRM does not have
substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal government and Indian tribes, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
government and Indian tribes.
H. Consultation With the Advisory Committee on Construction Safety and
Health
Under 29 CFR parts 1911 and 1912, OSHA must consult with the
Advisory Committee on Construction Safety and Health (``ACCSH'' or
``the Committee''), established pursuant to Section 107 of the Contract
Work Hours and Safety Standards Act, 40 U.S.C. 3701-3708, in setting
standards for construction work. Specifically, Sec. 1911.10(a)
requires the Assistant Secretary to provide ACCSH with a proposed rule
(along with pertinent factual information), and give the Committee an
opportunity to submit recommendations. See, also, Sec. 1912.3(a)
(``[W]henever occupational safety or health standards for construction
activities are proposed, the Assistant Secretary [for Occupational
Safety and Health] shall consult the Advisory Committee'').
On March 18, 2013, OSHA presented to the ACCSH a draft of this
NPRM, as well as a table comparing the current regulatory text with the
proposed regulatory text for the provisions of 29 CFR 1926.200 subject
to this rulemaking. OSHA explained that it was proposing to update
these provisions by allowing employers to comply with either the older
ANSI standards, Z35.1-1968, Z35.2-1968, and Z53.1-1967, or the latest
ANSI standards, Z535.1-006(R2011), Z535.2-2011, and Z535.5-2011. The
ACCSH subsequently recommended that OSHA proceed with the proposed rule
to update Sec. 1926.200 (a transcript of these proceedings is
available at Docket No. OSHA-2013-0005-0007, pp. 41-46). ACCSH members
also suggested that OSHA consider replacing the illustrations of the
old signs and tags it is removing from Sec. 1926.200(b)(1), (c)(1),
and (h)(2) with the new ones, or a combination of the old ones and the
new ones. Id. at 21-23. OSHA will consider this suggestion for a future
rulemaking.
V. Authority and Signature
David Michaels, Ph.D., MPH, Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health, U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20210, authorized the preparation
of this NPRM. OSHA is issuing this NPRM pursuant to 29 U.S.C. 653, 655,
and 657; 5 U.S.C. 553; 40 U.S.C. 3701-3708; Secretary of Labor's Order
1-2012, 77 FR 3912 (2012); and 29 CFR part 1911.
List of Subjects in 29 CFR Parts 1910 and 1926
Construction, General industry, Occupational safety and health,
Safety, Signs, Tags.
Signed at Washington, DC, on June 5, 2013.
David Michaels,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health.
Proposed Amendments to Standards
For the reasons stated above in the preamble, the Occupational
Safety and Health Administration is proposing to amend 29 CFR parts
1910 and 1926 as follows:
PART 1910--[AMENDED]
Subpart A--[Amended]
0
1. The authority citation for subpart A of part 1910 continues to read
as follows:
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 653, 655, 657; Secretary of Labor's Order
No. 12-71 (36 FR 8754), 8-76 (41 FR 25059), 9-83 (48 FR 35736), 1-90
(55 FR 9033), 6-96 (62 FR 111), 3-2000 (65 FR 50017), 5-2002 (67 FR
65008), 5-2007 (72 FR 31159), 4-2010 (75 FR 55355), or 1-2012 (77 FR
3912), as applicable.
Sections 1910.6, 1910.7, 1910.8 and 1910.9 also issued under 29
CFR 1911. Section 1910.7(f) also issued under 31 U.S.C. 9701, 29
U.S.C. 9a, 5 U.S.C. 553; Public Law 106-113 (113 Stat. 1501A-222);
Pub. L. 11-8 and 111-317; and OMB Circular A-25 (dated July 8, 1993)
(58 FR 38142, July 15, 1993).
0
2. Amend Sec. 1910.6 as follows:
0
a. Revise paragraphs (e)(59) and (e)(65);
0
b. Redesignate paragraphs (e)(66) through (e)(77) as paragraphs (e)(68)
through (e)(79); and
0
c. Add paragraphs (e)(66) and (e)(67).
Sec. 1910.6 Incorporation by reference.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(59) ANSI Z35.1-1968, Specifications for Accident Prevention Signs;
IBR approved for Sec. 1910.261(c). Copies available for purchase from
the IHS Standards Store, 15 Inverness Way East, Englewood, CO 80112;
telephone: 1-877-413-5184; Web site: www.global.ihs.com.
* * * * *
(65) USAS Z53.1-1967 (also referred to as ANSI Z53.1-1967), Safety
Color Code for Marking Physical Hazards, ANSI approved October 9, 1967;
IBR approved for Sec. 1910.97(a) and 1910.145(d). Copies available for
purchase from the IHS Standards Store, 15 Inverness Way East,
Englewood, CO 80112; telephone: 1-877-413-5184; Web site:
www.global.ihs.com.
(66) ANSI Z535.1-2006(R2011), Safety Colors, reaffirmed July 19,
2011; IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 1910.97(a) and 1910.145(d). Copies
available for purchase from the International Safety Equipment
Association, 1901 North Moore Street, Arlington, VA 22209-1762;
telephone: 703-525-1695; fax: 703-528-2148; Web site:
www.safetyequipment.org.
(67) ANSI Z535.2-2011, Environmental and Facility Safety Signs,
published September 15, 2011; IBR approved for Sec. 1910.261(c).
Copies available for purchase from the International Safety Equipment
Association, 1901 North Moore Street, Arlington, VA 22209-1762;
telephone: 703-525-1695; fax: 703-528-2148; Web site:
www.safetyequipment.org.
* * * * *
Subpart G--[Amended]
0
3. Revise the authority citation for subpart G of part 1910 to read as
follows:
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 653, 655, 657; Secretary of Labor's Order
No. 12-71 (36 FR 8754), 8-76 (41 FR 25059), 9-83 (48 FR 35736), 1-90
(55 FR 9033), 6-96 (62 FR 111), 3-2000 (65 FR 50017), 5-2002 (67 FR
50017), 5-2007 (72 FR 31159), 4-2010 (75 FR 55355), or 1-2012 (77 FR
3912), as applicable; and 29 CFR part 1911.
0
4. Amend Sec. 1910.97 by revising paragraph (a)(3)(ii) to read as
follows:
Sec. 1910.97 Nonionizing radiation.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(3) * * *
(ii) ANSI Z53.1-1967 or ANSI Z535.1-2006(R2011), incorporated by
reference in Sec. 1910.6, is for use for color specification. All
lettering and the border shall be of aluminum color.
* * * * *
Subpart J--[Amended]
0
5. Revise the authority citation for subpart J of part 1910 to read as
follows:
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 653, 655, 657; Secretary of Labor's Order
No. 12-71 (36 FR 8754), 8-76 (41 FR 25059), 9-83 (48 FR
[[Page 35592]]
35736), 1-90 (55 FR 9033), 6-96 (62 FR 111), 3-2000 (65 FR 50017),
5-2007 (72 FR 31159), 4-2010 (75 FR 55355), or 1-2012 (77 FR 3912),
as applicable.
Sections 1910.141, 1910.142, 1910.145, 1910.146, and 1910.147
also issued under 29 CFR part 1911.
0
6. Amend Sec. 1910.145 by revising paragraphs (d)(2), (d)(4), and
(d)(6) to read as follows:
Sec. 1910.145 Specifications for accident prevention signs and tags.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(2) Danger signs. The colors red, black, and white shall be those
of opaque glossy samples as specified in Table 1, ``Fundamental
Specification of Safety Colors for CIE Standard Source `C,' '' of ANSI
Z53.1-1967 or in Table 1, ``Specification of the Safety Colors for CIE
Illuminate C and the CIE 1931, 2[deg] Standard Observer,'' of ANSI
Z535.1-2006(R2011), incorporated by reference in Sec. 1910.6.
* * * * *
(4) Caution signs. The standard color of the background shall be
yellow; and the panel, black with yellow letters. Any letters used
against the yellow background shall be black. The colors shall be those
of opaque glossy samples as specified in Table 1 of ANSI Z53.1-1967 or
Table 1 of ANSI Z535.1-2006(R2011), incorporated by reference in Sec.
1910.6.
* * * * *
(6) Safety instruction signs. The standard color of the background
shall be white; and the panel, green with white letters. Any letters
used against the white background shall be black. The colors shall be
those of opaque glossy samples as specified in Table 1 of ANSI Z53.1-
1967 or in Table 1 of ANSI Z535.1-2006(R2011), incorporated by
reference in Sec. 1910.6.
* * * * *
Subpart R--[Amended]
0
7. Revise the authority citation for subpart R of part 1910 to read as
follows:
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 653, 655, 657; Secretary of Labor's Order
No. 12-71 (36 FR 8754), 8-76 (41 FR 25059), 9-83 (48 FR 35736), 1-90
(55 FR 9033), 6-96 (62 FR 111), 5-2007 (72 FR 31159)), 4-2010 (75 FR
55355), or 1-2012 (77 FR 3912), as applicable; and 29 CFR part 1911.
0
8. Amend Sec. 1910.261 by revising paragraph (c)(16) to read as
follows:
Sec. 1910.261 Pulp, paper, and paperboard mills.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(16) Signs. When conveyors cross walkways or roadways in the yards,
the employer must erect signs reading ``Danger--Overhead Conveyor'' or
an equivalent warning, in accordance with ANSI Z35.1-1968 or ANSI
Z535.2-2011, incorporated by reference in Sec. 1910.6.
* * * * *
PART 1926--[AMENDED]
Subpart A--[Amended]
0
9. The authority citation for subpart A of part 1926 continues to read
as follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 333; 29 U.S.C. 653, 655, 657; Secretary of
Labor's Order No. 12-71 (36 FR 8754), 8-76 (41 FR 25059), 9-83 (48
FR 35736), 6-96 (62 FR 111), 5-2007 (72 FR 31160), 4-2010 (75 FR
55355), or 1-2012 (77 FR 3912), as applicable; and 29 CFR part 1911.
0
10. Amend Sec. 1926.6 as follows:
0
a. Revise paragraph (h)(24);
0
b. Redesignate paragraphs (h)(27) through (h)(30) as (h)(31) through
(h)(34) and paragraph (u)(1) as (u)(2);
0
c. Add paragraphs (h)(27) through (h)(30), and (u)(1); and
0
d. Revise newly redesignated paragraph (u)(2).
Sec. 1926.6 Incorporation by reference.
* * * * *
(h) * * *
(24) ANSI Z35.1-1968, Specifications for Accident Prevention Signs;
IBR approved for Sec. 1926.200(b), (c), and 1 (i). Copies available
for purchase from the IHS Standards Store, 15 Inverness Way East,
Englewood, CO 80112; telephone: 1-877-413-5184; Web site:
www.global.ihs.com.
* * * * *
(27) USA Z53.1-1967 (also referred to as ANSI Z53.1-1967), Safety
Color Code for Marking Physical Hazards, ANSI approved October 9, 1967;
IBR approved for Sec. 1926.200(c). Copies available for purchase from
the IHS Standards Store, 15 Inverness Way East, Englewood, CO 80112;
telephone: 1-877-413-5184; Web site: www.global.ihs.com.
(28) ANSI Z535.1-2006(R2011), Safety Colors, reaffirmed July 19,
2011; IBR approved for Sec. 1926.200(c). Copies available for purchase
from the International Safety Equipment Association, 1901 North Moore
Street, Arlington, VA 22209-1762; telephone: 703-525-1695; fax: 703-
528-2148; Web site: www.safetyequipment.org.
(29) ANSI Z535.2-2011, Environmental and Facility Safety Signs,
published September 15, 2011; IBR approved for Sec. 1926.200(b), (c),
and (i). Copies available for purchase from the International Safety
Equipment Association, 1901 North Moore Street, Arlington, VA 22209-
1762; telephone: 703-525-1695; fax: 703-528-2148; Web site:
www.safetyequipment.org.
(30) ANSI Z535.5-2011, Safety Tags and Barricade Tapes (for
Temporary Hazards), published September 15, 2011, including Errata,
November 14, 2011; IBR approved for Sec. 1926.200(h) and (i). Copies
available for purchase from the International Safety Equipment
Association, 1901 North Moore Street, Arlington, VA 22209-1762;
telephone: 703-525-1695; fax: 703-528-2148; Web site:
www.safetyequipment.org.
* * * * *
(u) * * *
(1) Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), Part VI,
Standards and Guides for Traffic Controls for Street and Highway
Construction, Maintenance, Utility, and Incident Management Operation,
1988 Edition, Revision 3, September 3, 1993; IBR approved for
Sec. Sec. 1926.200(g), 1926.201(a), and 1926.202. Electronic copies of
the MUTCD, 1988 Edition, Revision 3, are available for downloading at
https://www.osha.gov/doc/highway_workzones/mutcd/.
(2) Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), Millennium
Edition, Dec. 2000; IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 1926.200(g)),
1926.201(a), and 1926.202. Electronic copies of the MUTCD 2000 are
available for downloading at https://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/kno-millennium_12.18.00.htm.
* * * * *
Subpart G--[Amended]
0
11. Revise the authority citation for subpart G of part 1926 to read as
follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 333; 29 U.S.C. 653, 655, 657; Secretary of
Labor's Order No. 12-71 (36 FR 8754), 8-76 (41 FR 25059), 9-83 (48
FR 35736), 3-2000 (65 FR 50017), 5-2002 (67 FR 65008), 5-2007 (72 FR
31159), 4-2010 (75 FR 55355), or 1-2012 (77 FR 3912), as applicable;
and 29 CFR part 1911.
0
12. Amend Sec. 1926.200 by revising paragraphs (b)(1), (c)(1), (c)(3),
(g)(2), (h)(2), and (i) to read as follows:
Sec. 1926.200 Accident prevention signs and tags.
* * * * *
(b) Danger signs. (1) Danger signs shall be used only where an
immediate hazard exists, and shall follow the specifications provided
in Figure 1 of ANSI Z35.1-1968 or in Figure 2 of ANSI Z535.2-2011,
incorporated by reference in Sec. 1926.6.
* * * * *
[[Page 35593]]
(c) Caution signs. (1) Caution signs shall be used only to warn
against potential hazards or to caution against unsafe practices, and
shall follow the specifications provided in Figure 4 of ANSI Z35.1-1968
or in Figure 2 of ANSI Z535.2-2011, incorporated by reference for the
sections specified in Sec. 1926.6.
* * * * *
(3) The standard color of the background shall be yellow; and the
panel, black with yellow letters. Any letters used against the yellow
background shall be black. The colors shall be those of opaque glossy
samples as specified in Table 1 of ANSI Z53.1-1967 or in Table 1 of
ANSI Z535.1-2006(R2011), incorporated by reference in Sec. 1926.6.
* * * * *
(g) * * *
(2) All traffic control signs or devices used for protection of
construction workers shall conform to Part VI of the MUTCD, 1988
Edition, Revision 3, or Part VI of the MUTCD, Millennium Edition,
incorporated by reference in Sec. 1926.6.
(h) * * *
(2) For accident prevention tags, employers shall follow
specifications that are similar to those in Figures 1 to 4 of ANSI
Z35.2-1968 or Figures 1 to 8 of ANSI Z535.5-2011, incorporated by
reference in Sec. 1926.6.
(i) Additional rules. ANSI Z35.1-1968, ANSI Z535.2-2011, ANSI
Z35.2-1968, and ANSI Z535.5-2011, incorporated by reference in Sec.
1926.6, contain rules in addition to those specifically prescribed in
this subpart. The employer shall comply with ANSI Z35.1-1968 or ANSI
Z535.2-2011, and ANSI Z35.2-1968 or Z535.5-2011, with respect to such
additional rules.
0
13. Amend Sec. 1926.201 by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 1926.201 Signaling.
(a) Flaggers. Signaling by flaggers and the use of flaggers,
including warning garments worn by flaggers, shall conform to Part VI
of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (1988 Edition,
Revision 3, or the Millennium Edition), incorporated by reference in
Sec. 1926.6.
* * * * *
0
14. Revise Sec. 1926.202 to read as follows:
Sec. 1926.202 Barricades.
Barricades for protection of employees shall conform to Part VI of
the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (1988 Edition, Revision
3, or the Millennium Edition), incorporated by reference in Sec.
1926.6.
[FR Doc. 2013-13910 Filed 6-12-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-26-P