Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2010-2011, 35248-35249 [2013-13989]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
35248
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 113 / Wednesday, June 12, 2013 / Notices
exporter. These deposit requirements,
when imposed, shall remain in effect
until further notice.
Disclosure
We will disclose the calculations
performed within five days of the date
of publication of this notice to parties in
this proceeding in accordance with 19
CFR 351.224(b).
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this POR. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Department’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
has occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping
duties.
Administrative Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective orders (‘‘APO’’) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials, or conversion to
judicial protective order, is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and terms of an APO is a
violation which is subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing this
administrative review and notice in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i) of the Act.
Dated: June 5, 2013.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
I. General Issues
Issue 1: Respondent Selection
Issue 2: Surrogate Country Selection
Issue 3: Calculation of the Surrogate
Financial Ratios
Issue 4: Calculation of a Separate Rate
II. Company-Specific Issues
Issue 5: Treatment of the DuPont Group’s
Reintroduced PET Chip
Issue 6: Calculation of the DuPont Group’s
U.S. Indirect Selling Ratio
Issue 7: Calculation of the DuPont Group’s
Foreign Brokerage and Handling Expenses
Jkt 229001
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order
is circular welded non-alloy steel pipe
and tube. For a full description of the
scope of the order, see Issues and
Decision Memorandum,3 which is
hereby adopted by this notice. The
written description is dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
International Trade Administration
[A–580–809]
Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe
From the Republic of Korea: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2010–2011
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On December 7, 2012, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary
results of the administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on circular
welded non-alloy steel pipe (CWP) from
the Republic of Korea (Korea) for the
period November 1, 2010, through
October 31, 2011.1 For these final
results, we find that subject
merchandise has been sold at less than
normal value.
DATES: Effective Date: June 12, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Kolberg or Jennifer Meek, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 1, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone (202) 482–1785 or (202) 482–
2778, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
Appendix—Issues & Decision
Memorandum
16:32 Jun 11, 2013
[FR Doc. 2013–13985 Filed 6–11–13; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Notification to Importers Regarding
The Reimbursement of Duties
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Issue 8: Calculation of the DuPont Group’s
Margin Using the Average-to-Transaction
Method
Issue 9: The DuPont Group’s Billing
Adjustments
Issue 10: Green Packing’s By-Product Offsets
Issue 11: Assessment Rate to Curwood
On December 7, 2012, the Department
published the preliminary results of the
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on CWP from
Korea.2
On February 19, 2013, we received
case briefs from Husteel Co., Ltd.
(Husteel), Hyundai HYSCO (HYSCO),
United States Steel Corporation, and
Wheatland Tube Company. On February
28, 2013, we received rebuttal briefs
from these four interested parties.
1 See Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From
the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2010–
2011, 77 FR 73015 (December 7, 2012) (Preliminary
Results).
2 Id.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The comments received in the case
and rebuttal briefs are addressed in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum. A
list of the issues raised and to which we
have responded in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum, is attached to
this notice as an Appendix. The Issues
and Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Import Administration’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(IA ACCESS). Access to IA ACCESS is
available to registered users at https://
iaaccess.trade.gov and is available to all
parties in the Central Records Unit,
Room 7046 of the main Department of
Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly on the Internet at https://
www.trade.gov/ia. The signed Issues
and Decision Memorandum and the
electronic version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
Changes From the Preliminary Results
Based on our analysis of the
comments received from interested
parties, we have changed our
calculation methodology for Husteel’s
and HYSCO’s dumping margins, by
reallocating certain costs and revising
the targeted dumping analysis,
conversion factors, and general and
administrative and financial expenses.
See the Issues and Decision
Memorandum and the company-specific
calculation memoranda dated
concurrently with this notice.
Final Results of the Review
As a result of this review, we
determine that the following weightedaverage dumping margins exist for the
period November 1, 2010, through
October 31, 2011:
3 See Memorandum from Gary Taverman, Senior
Advisor for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for
Import Administration, entitled ‘‘Issues and
Decision Memorandum for the Administrative
Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Circular
Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from the Republic of
Korea,’’ (Issues and Decision Memorandum) dated
concurrently with this notice.
E:\FR\FM\12JNN1.SGM
12JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 113 / Wednesday, June 12, 2013 / Notices
review for all shipments of subject
merchandise entered or withdrawn from
Manufacturer/exporter
warehouse, for consumption, on or after
the date of publication as provided by
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The
Husteel Co., Ltd ........................
3.99 cash deposit rate for Husteel and
Hyundai HYSCO .......................
0.80 HYSCO will be equal to the respective
weighted-average dumping margin
established in the final results of this
Disclosure
review; (2) for merchandise exported by
We will disclose calculation
manufacturers or exporters not covered
memoranda used in our analysis to
in this review but covered in a prior
parties to these proceedings within five
segment of the proceeding, the cash
days of the date of the release of this
deposit rate will continue to be the
notice pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224(b).
company-specific rate published for the
Assessment Rates
most recently completed segment of this
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the proceeding in which that manufacturer
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), or exporter participated; (3) if the
exporter is not a firm covered in this
and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the Department
review, a prior review, or the original
has determined, and U.S. Customs and
investigation but the manufacturer is,
Border Protection (CBP) shall assess,
the cash deposit rate will be the rate
antidumping duties on all appropriate
established for the most recently
entries of subject merchandise in
completed segment of this proceeding
accordance with the final results of this
review. The Department intends to issue for the manufacturer of subject
merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit
assessment instructions to CBP 15 days
rate for all other manufacturers or
after the date of publication of these
exporters will continue to be 4.80
final results of review.
For assessment purposes, Husteel and percent, the ‘‘all others’’ rate established
pursuant to a court decision.4 These
HYSCO reported the name of the
cash deposit requirements, when
importer of record and the entered value
imposed, shall remain in effect until
for all of their sales to the United States
further notice.
during the period of review (POR).
Accordingly, we calculated importerNotifications
specific ad valorem antidumping duty
This notice serves as a final reminder
assessment rates on the basis of the ratio
to importers of their responsibility
of the total amount of dumping
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
calculated for the importer’s examined
sales and the total entered value of those certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
same sales in accordance with 19 CFR
liquidation of the relevant entries
351.212(b)(1). Where an importerduring this review period. Failure to
specific assessment rate is zero or de
comply with this requirement could
minimis, we will instruct CBP to
result in the Department’s presumption
liquidate the appropriate entries
without regard to antidumping duties in that reimbursement of antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
accordance with 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
assessment of doubled antidumping
The Department clarified its
duties.
‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on
May 6, 2003. This clarification will
This notice also serves as a reminder
apply to entries of subject merchandise
to parties subject to administrative
during the POR produced by Husteel
protective order (APO) of their
and HYSCO for which they did not
responsibility concerning the
know were destined for the United
disposition of proprietary information
States. In such instances, we will
disclosed under APO in accordance
instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
entries at the all-others rate if there is no written notification of the return or
rate for the intermediate company(ies)
destruction of APO materials, or
involved in the transaction. For a full
conversion to judicial protective order,
discussion of this clarification, see
is hereby requested. Failure to comply
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
with the regulations and the terms of an
Proceedings: Assessment of
APO is a sanctionable violation.
Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May
These final results of administrative
6, 2003).
review are issued and published in
Cash Deposit Requirements
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
The following deposit requirements
will be effective upon publication of the
notice of final results of administrative
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:32 Jun 11, 2013
Jkt 229001
4 See Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From
Korea: Notice of Final Court Decision and Amended
Final Determination, 60 FR 55833 (November 3,
1995).
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
35249
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: June 5, 2013.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
Appendix
List of Issues Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
Targeted Dumping Allegation
Cost Reallocation
Conversion Factors
G&A
Date of Sale
Pipe Grade
Warranty Expense
Interest Revenue
[FR Doc. 2013–13989 Filed 6–11–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–890]
Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the
People’s Republic of China: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2011
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On February 6, 2013, the
Department of Commerce (the
‘‘Department’’) published the
preliminary results of the administrative
review (‘‘AR’’) of wooden bedroom
furniture from the People’s Republic of
China (‘‘PRC’’) covering the period of
review (‘‘POR’’) January 1, 2011 through
December 31, 2011.1 We gave interested
parties an opportunity to comment on
the Preliminary Results. After reviewing
interested parties’ comments and the
information received, we made no
changes for the final results of this
review. In these final results of review
we determined that six companies,
including the two mandatory
respondents,2 failed to establish
eligibility for separate-rate status and,
thus, we treated these companies as part
of the PRC-wide entity; six companies
made no shipments of subject
merchandise during the POR and will
retain their separate-rate status, two
companies are U.S. importers and,
therefore, we rescinded the review of
AGENCY:
1 See Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the
People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2011, 78
FR 8493 (February 6, 2013) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’).
2 The two mandatory respondents are Shanghai
Maoji Import and Export Corp. Ltd. (‘‘Maoji’’), and
Dongguan Huansheng Furniture Co., Ltd.
(‘‘Huansheng’’).
E:\FR\FM\12JNN1.SGM
12JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 113 (Wednesday, June 12, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35248-35249]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-13989]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-580-809]
Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From the Republic of Korea:
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2010-2011
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On December 7, 2012, the Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary results of the administrative
review of the antidumping duty order on circular welded non-alloy steel
pipe (CWP) from the Republic of Korea (Korea) for the period November
1, 2010, through October 31, 2011.\1\ For these final results, we find
that subject merchandise has been sold at less than normal value.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From the Republic
of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2010-2011, 77 FR 73015 (December 7, 2012) (Preliminary
Results).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: June 12, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Kolberg or Jennifer Meek, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 1, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-1785
or (202) 482-2778, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 7, 2012, the Department published the preliminary
results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on
CWP from Korea.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On February 19, 2013, we received case briefs from Husteel Co.,
Ltd. (Husteel), Hyundai HYSCO (HYSCO), United States Steel Corporation,
and Wheatland Tube Company. On February 28, 2013, we received rebuttal
briefs from these four interested parties.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order is circular welded non-alloy
steel pipe and tube. For a full description of the scope of the order,
see Issues and Decision Memorandum,\3\ which is hereby adopted by this
notice. The written description is dispositive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Memorandum from Gary Taverman, Senior Advisor for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, entitled ``Issues and
Decision Memorandum for the Administrative Review of the Antidumping
Duty Order on Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from the Republic
of Korea,'' (Issues and Decision Memorandum) dated concurrently with
this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
The comments received in the case and rebuttal briefs are addressed
in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues raised and
to which we have responded in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, is
attached to this notice as an Appendix. The Issues and Decision
Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via
Import Administration's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS). Access to IA ACCESS is available
to registered users at https://iaaccess.trade.gov and is available to
all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room 7046 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the
Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet
at https://www.trade.gov/ia. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum
and the electronic version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are
identical in content.
Changes From the Preliminary Results
Based on our analysis of the comments received from interested
parties, we have changed our calculation methodology for Husteel's and
HYSCO's dumping margins, by reallocating certain costs and revising the
targeted dumping analysis, conversion factors, and general and
administrative and financial expenses. See the Issues and Decision
Memorandum and the company-specific calculation memoranda dated
concurrently with this notice.
Final Results of the Review
As a result of this review, we determine that the following
weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period November 1, 2010,
through October 31, 2011:
[[Page 35249]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Manufacturer/exporter dumping
margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Husteel Co., Ltd........................................... 3.99
Hyundai HYSCO.............................................. 0.80
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
We will disclose calculation memoranda used in our analysis to
parties to these proceedings within five days of the date of the
release of this notice pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the Department has
determined, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess,
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in
accordance with the final results of this review. The Department
intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date
of publication of these final results of review.
For assessment purposes, Husteel and HYSCO reported the name of the
importer of record and the entered value for all of their sales to the
United States during the period of review (POR). Accordingly, we
calculated importer-specific ad valorem antidumping duty assessment
rates on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of dumping
calculated for the importer's examined sales and the total entered
value of those same sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
Where an importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we
will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard
to antidumping duties in accordance with 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
The Department clarified its ``automatic assessment'' regulation on
May 6, 2003. This clarification will apply to entries of subject
merchandise during the POR produced by Husteel and HYSCO for which they
did not know were destined for the United States. In such instances, we
will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others
rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction. For a full discussion of this clarification, see
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of
Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for
all shipments of subject merchandise entered or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption, on or after the date of publication as
provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate
for Husteel and HYSCO will be equal to the respective weighted-average
dumping margin established in the final results of this review; (2) for
merchandise exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this
review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published
for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which
that manufacturer or exporter participated; (3) if the exporter is not
a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original
investigation but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be
the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this
proceeding for the manufacturer of subject merchandise; and (4) the
cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will
continue to be 4.80 percent, the ``all others'' rate established
pursuant to a court decision.\4\ These cash deposit requirements, when
imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From Korea: Notice
of Final Court Decision and Amended Final Determination, 60 FR 55833
(November 3, 1995).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notifications
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping duties.
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or
conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure
to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a
sanctionable violation.
These final results of administrative review are issued and
published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the
Act.
Dated: June 5, 2013.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
Appendix
List of Issues Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
Targeted Dumping Allegation
Cost Reallocation
Conversion Factors
G&A
Date of Sale
Pipe Grade
Warranty Expense
Interest Revenue
[FR Doc. 2013-13989 Filed 6-11-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
