Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2011, 35249-35251 [2013-13987]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 113 / Wednesday, June 12, 2013 / Notices review for all shipments of subject merchandise entered or withdrawn from Manufacturer/exporter warehouse, for consumption, on or after the date of publication as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The Husteel Co., Ltd ........................ 3.99 cash deposit rate for Husteel and Hyundai HYSCO ....................... 0.80 HYSCO will be equal to the respective weighted-average dumping margin established in the final results of this Disclosure review; (2) for merchandise exported by We will disclose calculation manufacturers or exporters not covered memoranda used in our analysis to in this review but covered in a prior parties to these proceedings within five segment of the proceeding, the cash days of the date of the release of this deposit rate will continue to be the notice pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224(b). company-specific rate published for the Assessment Rates most recently completed segment of this Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the proceeding in which that manufacturer Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), or exporter participated; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the Department review, a prior review, or the original has determined, and U.S. Customs and investigation but the manufacturer is, Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, the cash deposit rate will be the rate antidumping duties on all appropriate established for the most recently entries of subject merchandise in completed segment of this proceeding accordance with the final results of this review. The Department intends to issue for the manufacturer of subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit assessment instructions to CBP 15 days rate for all other manufacturers or after the date of publication of these exporters will continue to be 4.80 final results of review. For assessment purposes, Husteel and percent, the ‘‘all others’’ rate established pursuant to a court decision.4 These HYSCO reported the name of the cash deposit requirements, when importer of record and the entered value imposed, shall remain in effect until for all of their sales to the United States further notice. during the period of review (POR). Accordingly, we calculated importerNotifications specific ad valorem antidumping duty This notice serves as a final reminder assessment rates on the basis of the ratio to importers of their responsibility of the total amount of dumping under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a calculated for the importer’s examined sales and the total entered value of those certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to same sales in accordance with 19 CFR liquidation of the relevant entries 351.212(b)(1). Where an importerduring this review period. Failure to specific assessment rate is zero or de comply with this requirement could minimis, we will instruct CBP to result in the Department’s presumption liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties in that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent accordance with 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). assessment of doubled antidumping The Department clarified its duties. ‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on May 6, 2003. This clarification will This notice also serves as a reminder apply to entries of subject merchandise to parties subject to administrative during the POR produced by Husteel protective order (APO) of their and HYSCO for which they did not responsibility concerning the know were destined for the United disposition of proprietary information States. In such instances, we will disclosed under APO in accordance instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely entries at the all-others rate if there is no written notification of the return or rate for the intermediate company(ies) destruction of APO materials, or involved in the transaction. For a full conversion to judicial protective order, discussion of this clarification, see is hereby requested. Failure to comply Antidumping and Countervailing Duty with the regulations and the terms of an Proceedings: Assessment of APO is a sanctionable violation. Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May These final results of administrative 6, 2003). review are issued and published in Cash Deposit Requirements mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Weightedaverage dumping margin (percent) The following deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the notice of final results of administrative VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:32 Jun 11, 2013 Jkt 229001 4 See Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From Korea: Notice of Final Court Decision and Amended Final Determination, 60 FR 55833 (November 3, 1995). PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 35249 accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: June 5, 2013. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. Appendix List of Issues Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum Targeted Dumping Allegation Cost Reallocation Conversion Factors G&A Date of Sale Pipe Grade Warranty Expense Interest Revenue [FR Doc. 2013–13989 Filed 6–11–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–890] Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2011 Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On February 6, 2013, the Department of Commerce (the ‘‘Department’’) published the preliminary results of the administrative review (‘‘AR’’) of wooden bedroom furniture from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) covering the period of review (‘‘POR’’) January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011.1 We gave interested parties an opportunity to comment on the Preliminary Results. After reviewing interested parties’ comments and the information received, we made no changes for the final results of this review. In these final results of review we determined that six companies, including the two mandatory respondents,2 failed to establish eligibility for separate-rate status and, thus, we treated these companies as part of the PRC-wide entity; six companies made no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR and will retain their separate-rate status, two companies are U.S. importers and, therefore, we rescinded the review of AGENCY: 1 See Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2011, 78 FR 8493 (February 6, 2013) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’). 2 The two mandatory respondents are Shanghai Maoji Import and Export Corp. Ltd. (‘‘Maoji’’), and Dongguan Huansheng Furniture Co., Ltd. (‘‘Huansheng’’). E:\FR\FM\12JNN1.SGM 12JNN1 35250 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 113 / Wednesday, June 12, 2013 / Notices these companies, and three companies have demonstrated eligibility for separate-rate status and have been assigned antidumping duty margins. The final antidumping duty margins for this review are listed below in the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section of this notice. DATES: Effective Date: June 12, 2013. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick O’Connor, AD/CVD Operations, Office 4, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0989. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On February 6, 2013, the Department published its Preliminary Results of the AR of the antidumping order on wooden bedroom furniture from the PRC covering the period January 1, 2011, through December 31, 2011. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Analysis of the Comments Received All issues raised in the case briefs are addressed in the memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People’s Republic of China’’ (‘‘I&D Memorandum’’), which is dated concurrently with this notice and which is hereby adopted by this notice. A list of the issues addressed in the I&D Memorandum is appended to this notice. The I&D Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Import Administration’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Services System (‘‘IA ACCESS). Access to IA ACCESS is available to registered users at http:// iaaccess.trade.gov and in the Central Records Unit of the main Commerce Building, Room 7046. In addition, a complete version of the I&D Memorandum is accessible on the Department’s Web site at http:// www.trade.gov/ia/. The signed I&D Memorandum and electronic version of the I&D Memorandum are identical in content. Scope of the Order The product covered by the order is wooden bedroom furniture, subject to certain exceptions. Imports of subject merchandise are currently classified under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) subheadings: 9403.50.9042, 9403.50.9045, 9403.50.9080, 9403.50.9041, 9403.60.8081, 9403.20.0018, 9403.90.8041, 7009.92.1000 or 7009.92.5000. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written product description in the Order remains dispositive.3 Final Partial Rescission In the Preliminary Results, the Department stated that it intends to rescind the AR with respect to Foliot Furniture Pacific Inc. (‘‘Foliot Pacific’’) and Foliot Furniture Corporation (‘‘Foliot Corporation’’) because these companies were identified as U.S. importers and the Department does not conduct ARs of U.S. importers. No parties commented on our intent to rescind the AR with respect to these two companies. Because there is no information or argument on the record of the current AR that warrants reconsidering our intent to partially rescind this AR, we are rescinding this AR with respect to Foliot Pacific and Foliot Corporation. Final Determination of No Shipments As noted in the Preliminary Results, we determined that the following companies did not have any reviewable transactions during the POR: (1) Clearwise Company Limited (‘‘Clearwise’’); (2) Dongguan Yujia Furniture Co., Ltd. (‘‘Yujia’’); (3) Golden Well International (HK) Ltd. (‘‘Golden Well’’); (4) Hangzhou Cadman Trading Co., Ltd. (‘‘Cadman’’); (5) Yeh Brothers World Trade, Inc. (‘‘Yeh Brothers’’); and (6) Zhejiang Tianyi Scientific and Educational Equipment Co., Ltd. (‘‘Zhejiang Tianyi’’).4 No parties commented on this issue, and we have not received any information that contradicts these companies’ claims of no-shipments. We continue to find that these companies did not have shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. We will issue instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) for any suspended entries under these companies’ antidumping duty case numbers as noted below. Changes Since the Preliminary Results We made no changes from the Preliminary Results. VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:32 Jun 11, 2013 Jkt 229001 3 For a complete description of the scope of the order, see I&D Memorandum. 4 See Preliminary Results, 78 FR at 8494. PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Final Results of Review The Department has determined that the following dumping margins exist for the period January 1, 2011, through December 31, 2011: Exporter Baigou Crafts Factory of Fengkai ................................. Foliot Furniture Inc./Meubles Foliot Inc ............................... Hualing Furniture (China) Co., Ltd.; Tony House Manufacture (China) Co., Ltd.; Buysell Investments Ltd.; and Tony House Industries Co., Ltd ......................................... PRC-wide Entity 5 ..................... Weightedaverage margin (percent) 41.75 41.75 41.75 216.01 Assessment The Department has determined, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this AR. The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication date of these final results of review. Pursuant to a recently announced refinement to the Department’s assessment practice in NME cases, where we determined that an exporter under review had no shipments of the subject merchandise, any suspended entries under the exporter’s antidumping case number (i.e., entries suspended at the exporter’s rate) will be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate. For a full discussion of this practice, see Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011). Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of these final results of this AR for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the companies listed in the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section above, the cash deposit rate will be the rate listed above for the company; (2) for Clearwise, Yujia, Golden Well, Cadman, 5 The PRC-wide entity includes, among other companies: Shanghai Maoji Import and Export Corp. Ltd. Dongguan Huansheng Furniture Co., Ltd. Alexandre International Corp.; Southern Art Development Ltd.; Alexandre Furniture (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.; Southern Art Furniture Factory; Billy Wood Industrial (Dong Guan) Co., Ltd.; Great Union Industrial (Dongguan) Co., Ltd.; Time Faith Ltd.; Dongying Huanghekou Furniture Industry Co., Ltd.; Sheng Jing Wood Products (Beijing) Co., Ltd.; and Telstar Enterprises Ltd. E:\FR\FM\12JNN1.SGM 12JNN1 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 113 / Wednesday, June 12, 2013 / Notices Yeh Brothers, and Zhejiang Tianyi, which had no shipments, the cash deposit rate will remain unchanged from the rate assigned to these companies in the most recently completed review of the companies; (3) for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters who are not under review in this segment of the proceeding but who have separate rates, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-specific rate published for the most recent period; (4) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, including Maoji, Huansheng, Alexandre Furniture (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.; Southern Art Furniture Factory; Billy Wood Industrial (Dong Guan) Co., Ltd.; Great Union Industrial (Dongguan) Co., Ltd.; Time Faith Ltd.; Dongying Huanghekou Furniture Industry Co., Ltd.; Sheng Jing Wood Products (Beijing) Co., Ltd.; and Telstar Enterprises Ltd., the cash deposit rate will be the PRC-wide rate of 216.01 percent; and (5) for all nonPRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter(s) that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of the antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under the APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:32 Jun 11, 2013 Jkt 229001 This notice of the final results of the administrative review is issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). Dated: June 5, 2013. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. Appendix Comment 1: Whether Maoji has Demonstrated Eligibility for Separate-Rate Status Comment 2: The Appropriate Dumping Margin to Apply to Maoji as Part of the PRC-Wide Entity Comment 3: Whether the Department Should Determine that Maoji’s Suppliers are the Price Discriminators Comment 4: Potential Evasion of Antidumping Duties on Huansheng’s Subject Merchandise [FR Doc. 2013–13987 Filed 6–11–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–964] Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results and Partial Revocation of 2010/11 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On August 7, 2012, the Department of Commerce (‘‘Department’’) published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on seamless refined copper pipe and tube (‘‘copper pipe and tube’’) from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). The period of review (‘‘POR’’) is November 22, 2010 through October 31, 2011. Based on our analysis of the comments received, we have made no changes to the margin calculations for these final results. We continue to find that certain exporters have sold subject merchandise at less than normal value during the POR. DATES: Effective Date: June 12, 2013. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Martin or Robert Bolling, AD/ CVD Operations, Office 4, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3936, and (202) 482–3434, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 35251 Background On August 7, 2012, the Department published Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of the First Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, and Intent To Rescind in Part, 77 FR 47030 (August 7, 2012) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’). On August 21, 2012, Cerro Flow Products, LLC, Wieland Copper Products, LLC, Mueller Copper Tube Products, Inc., and Mueller Copper Tube Company, Inc. (collectively, ‘‘Petitioners’’) submitted additional surrogate value information for valuing factors of production. On August 27, 2012, Golden Dragon Precise Copper Tube Group, Inc. (‘‘Golden Dragon’’) also submitted additional surrogate value information for valuing factors of production. On August 27, 2012, the Department extended the deadline for filing comments on the Preliminary Results until September 13, 2012, and until September 18, 2012, for rebuttal comments. On September 5, 2012, Luvata Alltop (Zhongshan) Ltd. and Luvata Tube (Zhongshan) Ltd., (collectively ‘‘Luvata’’) filed comments on the Preliminary Results. The separate rate respondent Hong Kong Hailiang Metal Trading Limited, Zhejiang Hailiang Co., Ltd., and Shanghai Hailiang Copper Co., Ltd. (collectively ‘‘Hailiang’’), and Petitioners submitted case briefs with the Department on September 13, 2012. On September 17, 2012, the Department extended the deadline for rebuttal briefs until September 21, 2012. On September 21, 2012, Petitioners and Golden Dragon filed rebuttal briefs. On April 23, 2013, the Department requested additional factual documentation from Golden Dragon,1 which was submitted on April 24, 2013. On May 2, 2013, in response to an opportunity to comment from the Department, Petitioners and Golden Dragon submitted comments in response to Golden Dragon’s April 24, 2013, factual submission. On May 6, 2013, Petitioners and Golden Dragon submitted rebuttal comments. The Department’s original deadline for this final determination was December 5, 2012. As explained in the memorandum from the Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, the Department exercised its discretion to toll deadlines for the duration of the closure of the Federal Government from October 29, through October 30, 2012. 1 See Memorandum from Christian Marsh to the File, ‘‘Telephone Conversation with Counsel for Golden Dragon Precise Copper Tube Group, Inc. et al.,’’ dated April 23, 2013. E:\FR\FM\12JNN1.SGM 12JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 113 (Wednesday, June 12, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35249-35251]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-13987]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-890]


Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People's Republic of China: 
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2011

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On February 6, 2013, the Department of Commerce (the 
``Department'') published the preliminary results of the administrative 
review (``AR'') of wooden bedroom furniture from the People's Republic 
of China (``PRC'') covering the period of review (``POR'') January 1, 
2011 through December 31, 2011.\1\ We gave interested parties an 
opportunity to comment on the Preliminary Results. After reviewing 
interested parties' comments and the information received, we made no 
changes for the final results of this review. In these final results of 
review we determined that six companies, including the two mandatory 
respondents,\2\ failed to establish eligibility for separate-rate 
status and, thus, we treated these companies as part of the PRC-wide 
entity; six companies made no shipments of subject merchandise during 
the POR and will retain their separate-rate status, two companies are 
U.S. importers and, therefore, we rescinded the review of

[[Page 35250]]

these companies, and three companies have demonstrated eligibility for 
separate-rate status and have been assigned antidumping duty margins. 
The final antidumping duty margins for this review are listed below in 
the ``Final Results of Review'' section of this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People's Republic of 
China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review; 2011, 78 FR 8493 (February 6, 2013) (``Preliminary 
Results'').
    \2\ The two mandatory respondents are Shanghai Maoji Import and 
Export Corp. Ltd. (``Maoji''), and Dongguan Huansheng Furniture Co., 
Ltd. (``Huansheng'').

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: June 12, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick O'Connor, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office 4, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0989.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On February 6, 2013, the Department published its Preliminary 
Results of the AR of the antidumping order on wooden bedroom furniture 
from the PRC covering the period January 1, 2011, through December 31, 
2011.

Analysis of the Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case briefs are addressed in the 
memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, 
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, ``Issues and Decision 
Memorandum for the Final Results of the Administrative Review of the 
Antidumping Duty Order on Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People's 
Republic of China'' (``I&D Memorandum''), which is dated concurrently 
with this notice and which is hereby adopted by this notice. A list of 
the issues addressed in the I&D Memorandum is appended to this notice. 
The I&D Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically 
via Import Administration's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Centralized Electronic Services System (``IA ACCESS). Access to IA 
ACCESS is available to registered users at http://iaaccess.trade.gov 
and in the Central Records Unit of the main Commerce Building, Room 
7046. In addition, a complete version of the I&D Memorandum is 
accessible on the Department's Web site at http://www.trade.gov/ia/. 
The signed I&D Memorandum and electronic version of the I&D Memorandum 
are identical in content.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    We made no changes from the Preliminary Results.

Scope of the Order

    The product covered by the order is wooden bedroom furniture, 
subject to certain exceptions. Imports of subject merchandise are 
currently classified under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 
States (``HTSUS'') subheadings: 9403.50.9042, 9403.50.9045, 
9403.50.9080, 9403.50.9041, 9403.60.8081, 9403.20.0018, 9403.90.8041, 
7009.92.1000 or 7009.92.5000. Although the HTSUS subheadings are 
provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written product 
description in the Order remains dispositive.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ For a complete description of the scope of the order, see 
I&D Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Partial Rescission

    In the Preliminary Results, the Department stated that it intends 
to rescind the AR with respect to Foliot Furniture Pacific Inc. 
(``Foliot Pacific'') and Foliot Furniture Corporation (``Foliot 
Corporation'') because these companies were identified as U.S. 
importers and the Department does not conduct ARs of U.S. importers. No 
parties commented on our intent to rescind the AR with respect to these 
two companies. Because there is no information or argument on the 
record of the current AR that warrants reconsidering our intent to 
partially rescind this AR, we are rescinding this AR with respect to 
Foliot Pacific and Foliot Corporation.

Final Determination of No Shipments

    As noted in the Preliminary Results, we determined that the 
following companies did not have any reviewable transactions during the 
POR: (1) Clearwise Company Limited (``Clearwise''); (2) Dongguan Yujia 
Furniture Co., Ltd. (``Yujia''); (3) Golden Well International (HK) 
Ltd. (``Golden Well''); (4) Hangzhou Cadman Trading Co., Ltd. 
(``Cadman''); (5) Yeh Brothers World Trade, Inc. (``Yeh Brothers''); 
and (6) Zhejiang Tianyi Scientific and Educational Equipment Co., Ltd. 
(``Zhejiang Tianyi'').\4\ No parties commented on this issue, and we 
have not received any information that contradicts these companies' 
claims of no-shipments. We continue to find that these companies did 
not have shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. We will issue 
instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') for any 
suspended entries under these companies' antidumping duty case numbers 
as noted below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Preliminary Results, 78 FR at 8494.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of Review

    The Department has determined that the following dumping margins 
exist for the period January 1, 2011, through December 31, 2011:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Weighted-
                                                               average
                          Exporter                              margin
                                                              (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Baigou Crafts Factory of Fengkai...........................        41.75
Foliot Furniture Inc./Meubles Foliot Inc...................        41.75
Hualing Furniture (China) Co., Ltd.; Tony House Manufacture        41.75
 (China) Co., Ltd.; Buysell Investments Ltd.; and Tony
 House Industries Co., Ltd.................................
PRC-wide Entity \5\........................................       216.01
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment

    The Department has determined, and CBP shall assess, antidumping 
duties on all appropriate entries covered by this AR. The Department 
intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the 
publication date of these final results of review. Pursuant to a 
recently announced refinement to the Department's assessment practice 
in NME cases, where we determined that an exporter under review had no 
shipments of the subject merchandise, any suspended entries under the 
exporter's antidumping case number (i.e., entries suspended at the 
exporter's rate) will be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate. For a full 
discussion of this practice, see Non-Market Economy Antidumping 
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 
2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The PRC-wide entity includes, among other companies: 
Shanghai Maoji Import and Export Corp. Ltd. Dongguan Huansheng 
Furniture Co., Ltd. Alexandre International Corp.; Southern Art 
Development Ltd.; Alexandre Furniture (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.; Southern 
Art Furniture Factory; Billy Wood Industrial (Dong Guan) Co., Ltd.; 
Great Union Industrial (Dongguan) Co., Ltd.; Time Faith Ltd.; 
Dongying Huanghekou Furniture Industry Co., Ltd.; Sheng Jing Wood 
Products (Beijing) Co., Ltd.; and Telstar Enterprises Ltd.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of these final results of this AR for all shipments of the 
subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for 
consumption on or after the publication date, as provided for by 
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the companies listed in the 
``Final Results of Review'' section above, the cash deposit rate will 
be the rate listed above for the company; (2) for Clearwise, Yujia, 
Golden Well, Cadman,

[[Page 35251]]

Yeh Brothers, and Zhejiang Tianyi, which had no shipments, the cash 
deposit rate will remain unchanged from the rate assigned to these 
companies in the most recently completed review of the companies; (3) 
for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters who 
are not under review in this segment of the proceeding but who have 
separate rates, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-
specific rate published for the most recent period; (4) for all PRC 
exporters of subject merchandise which have not been found to be 
entitled to a separate rate, including Maoji, Huansheng, Alexandre 
Furniture (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.; Southern Art Furniture Factory; Billy 
Wood Industrial (Dong Guan) Co., Ltd.; Great Union Industrial 
(Dongguan) Co., Ltd.; Time Faith Ltd.; Dongying Huanghekou Furniture 
Industry Co., Ltd.; Sheng Jing Wood Products (Beijing) Co., Ltd.; and 
Telstar Enterprises Ltd., the cash deposit rate will be the PRC-wide 
rate of 216.01 percent; and (5) for all non-PRC exporters of subject 
merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit 
rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter(s) that supplied 
that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall 
remain in effect until further notice.

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
reimbursement of the antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.

Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under the APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of 
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction 
of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO 
is a violation which is subject to sanction.
    This notice of the final results of the administrative review is 
issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) 
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).

    Dated: June 5, 2013.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.

Appendix

Comment 1: Whether Maoji has Demonstrated Eligibility for Separate-
Rate Status
Comment 2: The Appropriate Dumping Margin to Apply to Maoji as Part 
of the PRC-Wide Entity
Comment 3: Whether the Department Should Determine that Maoji's 
Suppliers are the Price Discriminators
Comment 4: Potential Evasion of Antidumping Duties on Huansheng's 
Subject Merchandise

[FR Doc. 2013-13987 Filed 6-11-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P