Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2011, 35249-35251 [2013-13987]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 113 / Wednesday, June 12, 2013 / Notices
review for all shipments of subject
merchandise entered or withdrawn from
Manufacturer/exporter
warehouse, for consumption, on or after
the date of publication as provided by
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The
Husteel Co., Ltd ........................
3.99 cash deposit rate for Husteel and
Hyundai HYSCO .......................
0.80 HYSCO will be equal to the respective
weighted-average dumping margin
established in the final results of this
Disclosure
review; (2) for merchandise exported by
We will disclose calculation
manufacturers or exporters not covered
memoranda used in our analysis to
in this review but covered in a prior
parties to these proceedings within five
segment of the proceeding, the cash
days of the date of the release of this
deposit rate will continue to be the
notice pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224(b).
company-specific rate published for the
Assessment Rates
most recently completed segment of this
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the proceeding in which that manufacturer
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), or exporter participated; (3) if the
exporter is not a firm covered in this
and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the Department
review, a prior review, or the original
has determined, and U.S. Customs and
investigation but the manufacturer is,
Border Protection (CBP) shall assess,
the cash deposit rate will be the rate
antidumping duties on all appropriate
established for the most recently
entries of subject merchandise in
completed segment of this proceeding
accordance with the final results of this
review. The Department intends to issue for the manufacturer of subject
merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit
assessment instructions to CBP 15 days
rate for all other manufacturers or
after the date of publication of these
exporters will continue to be 4.80
final results of review.
For assessment purposes, Husteel and percent, the ‘‘all others’’ rate established
pursuant to a court decision.4 These
HYSCO reported the name of the
cash deposit requirements, when
importer of record and the entered value
imposed, shall remain in effect until
for all of their sales to the United States
further notice.
during the period of review (POR).
Accordingly, we calculated importerNotifications
specific ad valorem antidumping duty
This notice serves as a final reminder
assessment rates on the basis of the ratio
to importers of their responsibility
of the total amount of dumping
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
calculated for the importer’s examined
sales and the total entered value of those certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
same sales in accordance with 19 CFR
liquidation of the relevant entries
351.212(b)(1). Where an importerduring this review period. Failure to
specific assessment rate is zero or de
comply with this requirement could
minimis, we will instruct CBP to
result in the Department’s presumption
liquidate the appropriate entries
without regard to antidumping duties in that reimbursement of antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
accordance with 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
assessment of doubled antidumping
The Department clarified its
duties.
‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on
May 6, 2003. This clarification will
This notice also serves as a reminder
apply to entries of subject merchandise
to parties subject to administrative
during the POR produced by Husteel
protective order (APO) of their
and HYSCO for which they did not
responsibility concerning the
know were destined for the United
disposition of proprietary information
States. In such instances, we will
disclosed under APO in accordance
instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
entries at the all-others rate if there is no written notification of the return or
rate for the intermediate company(ies)
destruction of APO materials, or
involved in the transaction. For a full
conversion to judicial protective order,
discussion of this clarification, see
is hereby requested. Failure to comply
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
with the regulations and the terms of an
Proceedings: Assessment of
APO is a sanctionable violation.
Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May
These final results of administrative
6, 2003).
review are issued and published in
Cash Deposit Requirements
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
The following deposit requirements
will be effective upon publication of the
notice of final results of administrative
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:32 Jun 11, 2013
Jkt 229001
4 See Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From
Korea: Notice of Final Court Decision and Amended
Final Determination, 60 FR 55833 (November 3,
1995).
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
35249
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: June 5, 2013.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
Appendix
List of Issues Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
Targeted Dumping Allegation
Cost Reallocation
Conversion Factors
G&A
Date of Sale
Pipe Grade
Warranty Expense
Interest Revenue
[FR Doc. 2013–13989 Filed 6–11–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–890]
Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the
People’s Republic of China: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2011
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On February 6, 2013, the
Department of Commerce (the
‘‘Department’’) published the
preliminary results of the administrative
review (‘‘AR’’) of wooden bedroom
furniture from the People’s Republic of
China (‘‘PRC’’) covering the period of
review (‘‘POR’’) January 1, 2011 through
December 31, 2011.1 We gave interested
parties an opportunity to comment on
the Preliminary Results. After reviewing
interested parties’ comments and the
information received, we made no
changes for the final results of this
review. In these final results of review
we determined that six companies,
including the two mandatory
respondents,2 failed to establish
eligibility for separate-rate status and,
thus, we treated these companies as part
of the PRC-wide entity; six companies
made no shipments of subject
merchandise during the POR and will
retain their separate-rate status, two
companies are U.S. importers and,
therefore, we rescinded the review of
AGENCY:
1 See Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the
People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2011, 78
FR 8493 (February 6, 2013) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’).
2 The two mandatory respondents are Shanghai
Maoji Import and Export Corp. Ltd. (‘‘Maoji’’), and
Dongguan Huansheng Furniture Co., Ltd.
(‘‘Huansheng’’).
E:\FR\FM\12JNN1.SGM
12JNN1
35250
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 113 / Wednesday, June 12, 2013 / Notices
these companies, and three companies
have demonstrated eligibility for
separate-rate status and have been
assigned antidumping duty margins.
The final antidumping duty margins for
this review are listed below in the
‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section of this
notice.
DATES:
Effective Date: June 12, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Patrick O’Connor, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 4, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–0989.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On February 6, 2013, the Department
published its Preliminary Results of the
AR of the antidumping order on wooden
bedroom furniture from the PRC
covering the period January 1, 2011,
through December 31, 2011.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Analysis of the Comments Received
All issues raised in the case briefs are
addressed in the memorandum from
Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul
Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of
the Administrative Review of the
Antidumping Duty Order on Wooden
Bedroom Furniture from the People’s
Republic of China’’ (‘‘I&D
Memorandum’’), which is dated
concurrently with this notice and which
is hereby adopted by this notice. A list
of the issues addressed in the I&D
Memorandum is appended to this
notice. The I&D Memorandum is a
public document and is on file
electronically via Import
Administration’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Services System (‘‘IA
ACCESS). Access to IA ACCESS is
available to registered users at https://
iaaccess.trade.gov and in the Central
Records Unit of the main Commerce
Building, Room 7046. In addition, a
complete version of the I&D
Memorandum is accessible on the
Department’s Web site at https://
www.trade.gov/ia/. The signed I&D
Memorandum and electronic version of
the I&D Memorandum are identical in
content.
Scope of the Order
The product covered by the order is
wooden bedroom furniture, subject to
certain exceptions. Imports of subject
merchandise are currently classified
under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule
of the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’)
subheadings: 9403.50.9042,
9403.50.9045, 9403.50.9080,
9403.50.9041, 9403.60.8081,
9403.20.0018, 9403.90.8041,
7009.92.1000 or 7009.92.5000. Although
the HTSUS subheadings are provided
for convenience and customs purposes,
the written product description in the
Order remains dispositive.3
Final Partial Rescission
In the Preliminary Results, the
Department stated that it intends to
rescind the AR with respect to Foliot
Furniture Pacific Inc. (‘‘Foliot Pacific’’)
and Foliot Furniture Corporation
(‘‘Foliot Corporation’’) because these
companies were identified as U.S.
importers and the Department does not
conduct ARs of U.S. importers. No
parties commented on our intent to
rescind the AR with respect to these two
companies. Because there is no
information or argument on the record
of the current AR that warrants
reconsidering our intent to partially
rescind this AR, we are rescinding this
AR with respect to Foliot Pacific and
Foliot Corporation.
Final Determination of No Shipments
As noted in the Preliminary Results,
we determined that the following
companies did not have any reviewable
transactions during the POR: (1)
Clearwise Company Limited
(‘‘Clearwise’’); (2) Dongguan Yujia
Furniture Co., Ltd. (‘‘Yujia’’); (3) Golden
Well International (HK) Ltd. (‘‘Golden
Well’’); (4) Hangzhou Cadman Trading
Co., Ltd. (‘‘Cadman’’); (5) Yeh Brothers
World Trade, Inc. (‘‘Yeh Brothers’’); and
(6) Zhejiang Tianyi Scientific and
Educational Equipment Co., Ltd.
(‘‘Zhejiang Tianyi’’).4 No parties
commented on this issue, and we have
not received any information that
contradicts these companies’ claims of
no-shipments. We continue to find that
these companies did not have
shipments of subject merchandise
during the POR. We will issue
instructions to U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (‘‘CBP’’) for any suspended
entries under these companies’
antidumping duty case numbers as
noted below.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
We made no changes from the
Preliminary Results.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:32 Jun 11, 2013
Jkt 229001
3 For a complete description of the scope of the
order, see I&D Memorandum.
4 See Preliminary Results, 78 FR at 8494.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Final Results of Review
The Department has determined that
the following dumping margins exist for
the period January 1, 2011, through
December 31, 2011:
Exporter
Baigou Crafts Factory of
Fengkai .................................
Foliot Furniture Inc./Meubles
Foliot Inc ...............................
Hualing Furniture (China) Co.,
Ltd.; Tony House Manufacture (China) Co., Ltd.;
Buysell Investments Ltd.; and
Tony House Industries Co.,
Ltd .........................................
PRC-wide Entity 5 .....................
Weightedaverage
margin
(percent)
41.75
41.75
41.75
216.01
Assessment
The Department has determined, and
CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on
all appropriate entries covered by this
AR. The Department intends to issue
assessment instructions to CBP 15 days
after the publication date of these final
results of review. Pursuant to a recently
announced refinement to the
Department’s assessment practice in
NME cases, where we determined that
an exporter under review had no
shipments of the subject merchandise,
any suspended entries under the
exporter’s antidumping case number
(i.e., entries suspended at the exporter’s
rate) will be liquidated at the PRC-wide
rate. For a full discussion of this
practice, see Non-Market Economy
Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694
(October 24, 2011).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of these final results of this
AR for all shipments of the subject
merchandise entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or
after the publication date, as provided
for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1)
For the companies listed in the ‘‘Final
Results of Review’’ section above, the
cash deposit rate will be the rate listed
above for the company; (2) for
Clearwise, Yujia, Golden Well, Cadman,
5 The PRC-wide entity includes, among other
companies: Shanghai Maoji Import and Export
Corp. Ltd. Dongguan Huansheng Furniture Co., Ltd.
Alexandre International Corp.; Southern Art
Development Ltd.; Alexandre Furniture (Shenzhen)
Co., Ltd.; Southern Art Furniture Factory; Billy
Wood Industrial (Dong Guan) Co., Ltd.; Great Union
Industrial (Dongguan) Co., Ltd.; Time Faith Ltd.;
Dongying Huanghekou Furniture Industry Co., Ltd.;
Sheng Jing Wood Products (Beijing) Co., Ltd.; and
Telstar Enterprises Ltd.
E:\FR\FM\12JNN1.SGM
12JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 113 / Wednesday, June 12, 2013 / Notices
Yeh Brothers, and Zhejiang Tianyi,
which had no shipments, the cash
deposit rate will remain unchanged
from the rate assigned to these
companies in the most recently
completed review of the companies; (3)
for previously investigated or reviewed
PRC and non-PRC exporters who are not
under review in this segment of the
proceeding but who have separate rates,
the cash deposit rate will continue to be
the exporter-specific rate published for
the most recent period; (4) for all PRC
exporters of subject merchandise which
have not been found to be entitled to a
separate rate, including Maoji,
Huansheng, Alexandre Furniture
(Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.; Southern Art
Furniture Factory; Billy Wood Industrial
(Dong Guan) Co., Ltd.; Great Union
Industrial (Dongguan) Co., Ltd.; Time
Faith Ltd.; Dongying Huanghekou
Furniture Industry Co., Ltd.; Sheng Jing
Wood Products (Beijing) Co., Ltd.; and
Telstar Enterprises Ltd., the cash
deposit rate will be the PRC-wide rate
of 216.01 percent; and (5) for all nonPRC exporters of subject merchandise
which have not received their own rate,
the cash deposit rate will be the rate
applicable to the PRC exporter(s) that
supplied that non-PRC exporter. These
deposit requirements, when imposed,
shall remain in effect until further
notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Secretary’s presumption
that reimbursement of the antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping
duties.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under the APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a violation
which is subject to sanction.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:32 Jun 11, 2013
Jkt 229001
This notice of the final results of the
administrative review is issued and
published in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: June 5, 2013.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
Appendix
Comment 1: Whether Maoji has
Demonstrated Eligibility for Separate-Rate
Status
Comment 2: The Appropriate Dumping
Margin to Apply to Maoji as Part of the
PRC-Wide Entity
Comment 3: Whether the Department Should
Determine that Maoji’s Suppliers are the
Price Discriminators
Comment 4: Potential Evasion of
Antidumping Duties on Huansheng’s
Subject Merchandise
[FR Doc. 2013–13987 Filed 6–11–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–964]
Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and
Tube From the People’s Republic of
China: Final Results and Partial
Revocation of 2010/11 Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On August 7, 2012, the
Department of Commerce
(‘‘Department’’) published the
preliminary results of the administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
on seamless refined copper pipe and
tube (‘‘copper pipe and tube’’) from the
People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’).
The period of review (‘‘POR’’) is
November 22, 2010 through October 31,
2011. Based on our analysis of the
comments received, we have made no
changes to the margin calculations for
these final results. We continue to find
that certain exporters have sold subject
merchandise at less than normal value
during the POR.
DATES: Effective Date: June 12, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas Martin or Robert Bolling, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 4, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–3936, and (202)
482–3434, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
35251
Background
On August 7, 2012, the Department
published Seamless Refined Copper
Pipe and Tube From the People’s
Republic of China: Preliminary Results
of the First Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, and Intent To
Rescind in Part, 77 FR 47030 (August 7,
2012) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’).
On August 21, 2012, Cerro Flow
Products, LLC, Wieland Copper
Products, LLC, Mueller Copper Tube
Products, Inc., and Mueller Copper
Tube Company, Inc. (collectively,
‘‘Petitioners’’) submitted additional
surrogate value information for valuing
factors of production. On August 27,
2012, Golden Dragon Precise Copper
Tube Group, Inc. (‘‘Golden Dragon’’)
also submitted additional surrogate
value information for valuing factors of
production. On August 27, 2012, the
Department extended the deadline for
filing comments on the Preliminary
Results until September 13, 2012, and
until September 18, 2012, for rebuttal
comments. On September 5, 2012,
Luvata Alltop (Zhongshan) Ltd. and
Luvata Tube (Zhongshan) Ltd.,
(collectively ‘‘Luvata’’) filed comments
on the Preliminary Results. The separate
rate respondent Hong Kong Hailiang
Metal Trading Limited, Zhejiang
Hailiang Co., Ltd., and Shanghai
Hailiang Copper Co., Ltd. (collectively
‘‘Hailiang’’), and Petitioners submitted
case briefs with the Department on
September 13, 2012. On September 17,
2012, the Department extended the
deadline for rebuttal briefs until
September 21, 2012. On September 21,
2012, Petitioners and Golden Dragon
filed rebuttal briefs.
On April 23, 2013, the Department
requested additional factual
documentation from Golden Dragon,1
which was submitted on April 24, 2013.
On May 2, 2013, in response to an
opportunity to comment from the
Department, Petitioners and Golden
Dragon submitted comments in
response to Golden Dragon’s April 24,
2013, factual submission. On May 6,
2013, Petitioners and Golden Dragon
submitted rebuttal comments.
The Department’s original deadline
for this final determination was
December 5, 2012. As explained in the
memorandum from the Assistant
Secretary for Import Administration, the
Department exercised its discretion to
toll deadlines for the duration of the
closure of the Federal Government from
October 29, through October 30, 2012.
1 See Memorandum from Christian Marsh to the
File, ‘‘Telephone Conversation with Counsel for
Golden Dragon Precise Copper Tube Group, Inc. et
al.,’’ dated April 23, 2013.
E:\FR\FM\12JNN1.SGM
12JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 113 (Wednesday, June 12, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35249-35251]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-13987]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-890]
Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People's Republic of China:
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2011
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On February 6, 2013, the Department of Commerce (the
``Department'') published the preliminary results of the administrative
review (``AR'') of wooden bedroom furniture from the People's Republic
of China (``PRC'') covering the period of review (``POR'') January 1,
2011 through December 31, 2011.\1\ We gave interested parties an
opportunity to comment on the Preliminary Results. After reviewing
interested parties' comments and the information received, we made no
changes for the final results of this review. In these final results of
review we determined that six companies, including the two mandatory
respondents,\2\ failed to establish eligibility for separate-rate
status and, thus, we treated these companies as part of the PRC-wide
entity; six companies made no shipments of subject merchandise during
the POR and will retain their separate-rate status, two companies are
U.S. importers and, therefore, we rescinded the review of
[[Page 35250]]
these companies, and three companies have demonstrated eligibility for
separate-rate status and have been assigned antidumping duty margins.
The final antidumping duty margins for this review are listed below in
the ``Final Results of Review'' section of this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People's Republic of
China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2011, 78 FR 8493 (February 6, 2013) (``Preliminary
Results'').
\2\ The two mandatory respondents are Shanghai Maoji Import and
Export Corp. Ltd. (``Maoji''), and Dongguan Huansheng Furniture Co.,
Ltd. (``Huansheng'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: June 12, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick O'Connor, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 4, Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0989.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On February 6, 2013, the Department published its Preliminary
Results of the AR of the antidumping order on wooden bedroom furniture
from the PRC covering the period January 1, 2011, through December 31,
2011.
Analysis of the Comments Received
All issues raised in the case briefs are addressed in the
memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, ``Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of the Administrative Review of the
Antidumping Duty Order on Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People's
Republic of China'' (``I&D Memorandum''), which is dated concurrently
with this notice and which is hereby adopted by this notice. A list of
the issues addressed in the I&D Memorandum is appended to this notice.
The I&D Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically
via Import Administration's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Services System (``IA ACCESS). Access to IA
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://iaaccess.trade.gov
and in the Central Records Unit of the main Commerce Building, Room
7046. In addition, a complete version of the I&D Memorandum is
accessible on the Department's Web site at https://www.trade.gov/ia/.
The signed I&D Memorandum and electronic version of the I&D Memorandum
are identical in content.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
We made no changes from the Preliminary Results.
Scope of the Order
The product covered by the order is wooden bedroom furniture,
subject to certain exceptions. Imports of subject merchandise are
currently classified under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United
States (``HTSUS'') subheadings: 9403.50.9042, 9403.50.9045,
9403.50.9080, 9403.50.9041, 9403.60.8081, 9403.20.0018, 9403.90.8041,
7009.92.1000 or 7009.92.5000. Although the HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written product
description in the Order remains dispositive.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ For a complete description of the scope of the order, see
I&D Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Partial Rescission
In the Preliminary Results, the Department stated that it intends
to rescind the AR with respect to Foliot Furniture Pacific Inc.
(``Foliot Pacific'') and Foliot Furniture Corporation (``Foliot
Corporation'') because these companies were identified as U.S.
importers and the Department does not conduct ARs of U.S. importers. No
parties commented on our intent to rescind the AR with respect to these
two companies. Because there is no information or argument on the
record of the current AR that warrants reconsidering our intent to
partially rescind this AR, we are rescinding this AR with respect to
Foliot Pacific and Foliot Corporation.
Final Determination of No Shipments
As noted in the Preliminary Results, we determined that the
following companies did not have any reviewable transactions during the
POR: (1) Clearwise Company Limited (``Clearwise''); (2) Dongguan Yujia
Furniture Co., Ltd. (``Yujia''); (3) Golden Well International (HK)
Ltd. (``Golden Well''); (4) Hangzhou Cadman Trading Co., Ltd.
(``Cadman''); (5) Yeh Brothers World Trade, Inc. (``Yeh Brothers'');
and (6) Zhejiang Tianyi Scientific and Educational Equipment Co., Ltd.
(``Zhejiang Tianyi'').\4\ No parties commented on this issue, and we
have not received any information that contradicts these companies'
claims of no-shipments. We continue to find that these companies did
not have shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. We will issue
instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') for any
suspended entries under these companies' antidumping duty case numbers
as noted below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Preliminary Results, 78 FR at 8494.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of Review
The Department has determined that the following dumping margins
exist for the period January 1, 2011, through December 31, 2011:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Exporter margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Baigou Crafts Factory of Fengkai........................... 41.75
Foliot Furniture Inc./Meubles Foliot Inc................... 41.75
Hualing Furniture (China) Co., Ltd.; Tony House Manufacture 41.75
(China) Co., Ltd.; Buysell Investments Ltd.; and Tony
House Industries Co., Ltd.................................
PRC-wide Entity \5\........................................ 216.01
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment
The Department has determined, and CBP shall assess, antidumping
duties on all appropriate entries covered by this AR. The Department
intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the
publication date of these final results of review. Pursuant to a
recently announced refinement to the Department's assessment practice
in NME cases, where we determined that an exporter under review had no
shipments of the subject merchandise, any suspended entries under the
exporter's antidumping case number (i.e., entries suspended at the
exporter's rate) will be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate. For a full
discussion of this practice, see Non-Market Economy Antidumping
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24,
2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The PRC-wide entity includes, among other companies:
Shanghai Maoji Import and Export Corp. Ltd. Dongguan Huansheng
Furniture Co., Ltd. Alexandre International Corp.; Southern Art
Development Ltd.; Alexandre Furniture (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.; Southern
Art Furniture Factory; Billy Wood Industrial (Dong Guan) Co., Ltd.;
Great Union Industrial (Dongguan) Co., Ltd.; Time Faith Ltd.;
Dongying Huanghekou Furniture Industry Co., Ltd.; Sheng Jing Wood
Products (Beijing) Co., Ltd.; and Telstar Enterprises Ltd.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of these final results of this AR for all shipments of the
subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication date, as provided for by
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the companies listed in the
``Final Results of Review'' section above, the cash deposit rate will
be the rate listed above for the company; (2) for Clearwise, Yujia,
Golden Well, Cadman,
[[Page 35251]]
Yeh Brothers, and Zhejiang Tianyi, which had no shipments, the cash
deposit rate will remain unchanged from the rate assigned to these
companies in the most recently completed review of the companies; (3)
for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters who
are not under review in this segment of the proceeding but who have
separate rates, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-
specific rate published for the most recent period; (4) for all PRC
exporters of subject merchandise which have not been found to be
entitled to a separate rate, including Maoji, Huansheng, Alexandre
Furniture (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.; Southern Art Furniture Factory; Billy
Wood Industrial (Dong Guan) Co., Ltd.; Great Union Industrial
(Dongguan) Co., Ltd.; Time Faith Ltd.; Dongying Huanghekou Furniture
Industry Co., Ltd.; Sheng Jing Wood Products (Beijing) Co., Ltd.; and
Telstar Enterprises Ltd., the cash deposit rate will be the PRC-wide
rate of 216.01 percent; and (5) for all non-PRC exporters of subject
merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit
rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter(s) that supplied
that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of the antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under the APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction
of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO
is a violation which is subject to sanction.
This notice of the final results of the administrative review is
issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: June 5, 2013.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
Appendix
Comment 1: Whether Maoji has Demonstrated Eligibility for Separate-
Rate Status
Comment 2: The Appropriate Dumping Margin to Apply to Maoji as Part
of the PRC-Wide Entity
Comment 3: Whether the Department Should Determine that Maoji's
Suppliers are the Price Discriminators
Comment 4: Potential Evasion of Antidumping Duties on Huansheng's
Subject Merchandise
[FR Doc. 2013-13987 Filed 6-11-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
