Negotiated Rulemaking Committee, Negotiator Nominations and Schedule of Committee Meetings-Title IV Federal Student Aid Programs, Gainful Employment in a Recognized Occupation, 35179-35181 [2013-13975]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 113 / Wednesday, June 12, 2013 / Proposed Rules
regulations governing the IHBG and
Title VI Loan Guarantee programs are
located in part 1000 of HUD’s
regulations in title 24 of the Code of
Federal Regulations. In accordance with
section 106 of NAHASDA, HUD
developed the regulations with active
tribal participation, using the
procedures of the Negotiated
Rulemaking Act of 1996 (5 U.S.C. 561–
570).
Under the IHBG program, HUD makes
assistance available to eligible Indian
tribes for affordable housing activities.
The amount of assistance made
available to each Indian tribe is
determined using a formula that was
developed as part of a prior NAHASDA
negotiated rulemaking process. A
regulatory description of the allocation
formula under the IHBG program is
located in Subpart D of 24 CFR part
1000. In general, the amount of funding
for a tribe is the sum of the formula’s
need component and the Formula
Current Assisted Stock (FCAS)
component, subject to a minimum
funding amount authorized under the
regulations. Based on the amount of
funding appropriated annually for the
IHBG program, HUD calculates the
annual grant for each Indian tribe, and
provides this information to the Indian
tribes. An Indian Housing Plan for the
Indian tribe is then submitted to HUD.
If the Indian Housing Plan is found to
be in compliance with statutory and
regulatory requirements, the grant is
made.
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
II. The Negotiated Rulemaking
Committee
This notice announces the proposed
membership of the negotiated
rulemaking committee. In making its
proposed selections for membership on
the negotiated rulemaking committee,
HUD’s goal was to establish a committee
whose membership reflects a balanced
representation of Indian tribes.
Selections were based on those
nominees who met the eligibility
criteria for membership contained in the
September 18, 2012, Federal Register
notice (77 FR 57544). HUD is satisfied
that the proposed membership reflects a
geographically diverse cross-section of
small, medium, and large Indian tribes.
In addition to the tribal members of the
committee, there will be one or more
HUD representatives on the negotiated
rulemaking committee. After careful
consideration of the public comments
received on this proposed list of
committee members, HUD will
announce the final composition of the
negotiated rulemaking committee in a
subsequent Federal Register notice.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:54 Jun 11, 2013
Jkt 229001
HUD proposes to make the following
(23) selections for tribal membership on
the negotiated rulemaking committee:
Jason Adams, Executive Director,
Salish-Kootenai Housing Authority,
Pablo, Montana.
Annette Bryan, Executive Director,
Puyallup Housing Authority, Tacoma,
Washington.
Heather Cloud, Representative, HoChunk Nation, Tomah, Wisconsin.
Gary Cooper, Executive Director,
Cherokee Nation, Tahlequah,
Oklahoma
Pete Delgado, Executive Director,
Tohono O’odham Housing Authority,
Sells, Arizona.
Sami Jo Difuntorum, Executive Director,
Siletz Tribal Housing Department,
Siletz, Oregon.
Jason Dollarhide, Second Chief, Peoria
Tribe of Indians, Miami, Oklahoma.
Earl Evans, Councilor, Haliwa-Saponi
Tribe, Hollister, North Carolina.
Karin Lee Foster, Legal Counsel,
Yakama Housing Authority, Yakima,
Washington.
Carol Gore, President/CEO, Cook Inlet
Housing Authority, Anchorage,
Alaska.
Lafe Haugen, Executive Director,
Northern Cheyenne Housing
Authority, Lame Deer, Montana.
Richard Hill, General Manager, Mille
Lacs Housing Authority, Onamia,
Minnesota.
Leon Jacobs, Representative, Lumbee
Tribe, Pembroke, North Carolina.
Teri Nutter, Executive Director, Cooper
River Basin Regional Housing
Authority, Glennallen, Alaska.
Sam Okakok, Housing Director, Barrow,
Alaska.
Diana Phair, Executive Director, Lummi
Nation, Bellingham, Washington.
Michael Reed, CEO, Cocopah Indian
Housing and Development, Somerton,
Arizona.
Jack Sawyers, Special Projects, Paiute
Tribe of Utah, Cedar City, Utah.
Marty Shuravloff, Executive Director,
Kodiak Island Housing Authority,
Kodiak, Alaska.
Russell Sossamon, Executive Director,
Choctaw Housing Authority, Hugo,
Oklahoma.
Michael Thom, Vice Chair, Karuk Tribe,
Happy Camp, California.
Sharon Vogel, Executive Director,
Cheyenne River Housing Authority,
Eagle Butte, South Dakota.
Aneva Yazzie, CEO, Navajo Housing
Authority, Window Rock, Arizona.
III. Request for Comments and
Committee Nominations
Persons may submit comments on
HUD’s establishment of the formula
negotiating rulemaking committee and
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
35179
may submit additional nominations for
committee membership in accordance
with the ADDRESSES section above.
Nominations for membership on the
Committee must include:
1. The name of your nominee and a
description of the interests the nominee
would represent;
2. Evidence that your nominee is
authorized to represent a tribal
government, which may include the
tribally designated housing entity of a
tribe, with the interests the nominee
would represent, so long as the tribe
provides evidence that it authorizes
such representation;
3. A written commitment that the
nominee will actively participate in
good faith in the development of the
rule; and
4. The reasons that the persons
proposed above do not adequately
represent the interests of the person
submitting the nomination.
IV. Committee Meetings
At this time, HUD has not finalized
the schedule and agenda for the
committee meetings. HUD will provide
administrative support to the
committee. Notice of committee
meetings will be published in the
Federal Register. Meetings of the
negotiated rulemaking committee will
be open to the public without advance
registration. Public attendance may be
limited to the space available. Members
of the public will be provided with an
opportunity to make statements during
the meeting, to the extent that time
permits, and to file written statements
with the committee for its
consideration. In the event that the
logistics of the committee meetings are
changed, HUD will advise the public
through Federal Register notice.
Dated: June 5, 2013.
Sandra B. Henriquez,
Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian
Housing.
[FR Doc. 2013–13984 Filed 6–11–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Chapter VI
[Docket ID ED–2013–OPE–0077]
Negotiated Rulemaking Committee,
Negotiator Nominations and Schedule
of Committee Meetings—Title IV
Federal Student Aid Programs, Gainful
Employment in a Recognized
Occupation
Office of Postsecondary
Education, Department of Education.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\12JNP1.SGM
12JNP1
35180
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 113 / Wednesday, June 12, 2013 / Proposed Rules
Intention to establish negotiated
rulemaking committee.
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
ACTION:
SUMMARY: We announce our intention to
establish a negotiated rulemaking
committee to prepare proposed
regulations for the Federal Student Aid
programs authorized under title IV of
the Higher Education Act of 1965, as
amended (HEA) (title IV Federal
Student Aid programs). The proposed
regulations would establish standards
for programs that prepare students for
gainful employment in a recognized
occupation. This committee will
include representatives of organizations
or groups with interests that are
significantly affected by the subject
matter of the proposed regulations. We
request nominations for individual
negotiators who represent key
stakeholder constituencies for the issue
to be negotiated to serve on the
committee and we set a schedule for
committee meetings.
The Department continues to review
and appreciates and values the
testimony offered at the public hearings
and the comments submitted through
the public comment process regarding
other proposed rulemaking topics,
including: cash management of funds
provided under title IV Federal Student
Aid programs; regulations designed to
prevent fraud; State authorization for
programs offered through distance
education or correspondence education;
State authorization for foreign locations
of institutions located in a State; clock
to credit hour conversion; changes made
by the Violence Against Women
Reauthorization Act of 2013 to the
campus safety and security reporting
requirements in the HEA; the definition
of ‘‘adverse credit’’ for borrowers in the
Federal Direct PLUS Loan Program; and
campus-based Federal Student Aid
program reforms. We anticipate
announcing our intention to establish a
negotiated rulemaking committee or
committees to consider some or all of
these rulemaking issues in the coming
months.
DATES: We must receive your
nominations for negotiators to serve on
the committee on or before July 12,
2013. The dates, times, and locations of
the committee meetings are set out in
the Schedule for Negotiations section
under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION,
below.
ADDRESSES: Please send your
nominations for negotiators to Wendy
Macias, U.S. Department of Education,
1990 K Street NW., Room 8017,
Washington, DC 20006. Telephone:
(202) 502–7526 or by email:
wendy.macias@ed.gov.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:54 Jun 11, 2013
Jkt 229001
For
information about the content of this
notice, including information about the
negotiated rulemaking process or the
nomination submission process,
contact: Wendy Macias, U.S.
Department of Education, 1990 K Street
NW., room 8017, Washington, DC
20006. Telephone: (202) 502–7526 or by
email: wendy.macias@ed.gov.
For general information about the
negotiated rulemaking process, see The
Negotiated Rulemaking Process for Title
IV Regulations, Frequently Asked
Questions at https://www2.ed.gov/policy/
highered/reg/hearulemaking/hea08/negreg-faq.html.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf or text telephone,
call the Federal Relay Service, toll free,
at 1–800–877–8339.
Individuals with disabilities can
obtain this document in an accessible
format (e.g., braille, large print,
audiotape, or compact disc) on request
to the program contact person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
On May 1,
2012, we published a notice in the
Federal Register (77 FR 25658)
announcing our intent to establish a
negotiated rulemaking committee under
section 492 of the HEA to develop
proposed regulations designed to
prevent fraud and otherwise ensure
proper use of title IV Federal Student
Aid program funds, especially within
the context of current technologies. In
particular, we announced our intent to
propose regulations to address the use
of debit cards and other banking
mechanisms for disbursing title IV
Federal Student Aid program funds, and
to improve and streamline the campusbased Federal Student Aid programs.
We also announced two public hearings
at which interested parties could
comment on the topics suggested by the
Department and suggest additional
topics for consideration for action by the
negotiated rulemaking committee.
Those hearings were held on May 23,
2012, in Phoenix, Arizona, and on May
31, 2012, in Washington, DC. We
invited parties to comment and submit
topics for consideration in writing as
well.
On April 16, 2013, we published a
notice in the Federal Register (78 FR
2247), as corrected at 78 FR 25235,
announcing additional topics for
consideration for action by the
negotiated rulemaking committee. The
additional topics for consideration are:
cash management of funds provided
under the title IV Federal Student Aid
programs; State authorization for
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
programs offered through distance
education or correspondence education;
State authorization for foreign locations
of institutions located in a State; clock
to credit hour conversion; gainful
employment; changes made by the
Violence Against Women
Reauthorization Act of 2013, Public Law
113–4, to the campus safety and security
reporting requirements in the HEA; and
the definition of ‘‘adverse credit’’ for
borrowers in the Federal Direct PLUS
Loan Program. We announced three
public hearings at which interested
parties could comment on the new
topics suggested by the Department and
suggest additional topics for
consideration for action by the
negotiating committee. On May 13,
2013, we announced in the Federal
Register (78 FR 27880) the addition of
a fourth hearing. The hearings were held
on May 21, 2013, in Washington, DC;
May 23, 2013, in Minneapolis,
Minnesota; May 30, 2013, in San
Francisco, California; and June 4, 2013,
in Atlanta, Georgia. We also invited
parties unable to attend a public hearing
to submit written comments on the
additional topics and to submit other
topics for consideration. Transcripts
from all six public hearings will be
found once they are available at
https://www2.ed.gov/policy/highered/
reg/hearulemaking/2012/.
Written comments submitted in
response to the May 1, 2012, and April
16, 2013, notices may be viewed
through the Federal eRulemaking Portal
at www.regulations.gov. Instructions for
finding comments are available on the
site under ‘‘How to Use
Regulations.gov’’ in the Help section.
Individuals can enter docket ID ED–
2012–OPE–0008 in the search box to
locate the appropriate docket.
Regulatory Issues: After consideration
of the information received at the
regional hearings and the submitted
written comments, we have decided to
establish, at this time, one negotiating
committee to prepare proposed
regulations for the title IV Federal
Student Aid programs establishing
standards for programs that prepare
students for gainful employment in a
recognized occupation.
We intend to select negotiators for the
committee who represent the interests
significantly affected by the
establishment of standards for programs
that prepare students for gainful
employment in a recognized
occupation. In so doing, we will follow
the requirement in section 492(b)(1) of
the HEA that the individuals selected
must have demonstrated expertise or
experience in the relevant subject under
negotiation. We will also select
E:\FR\FM\12JNP1.SGM
12JNP1
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 113 / Wednesday, June 12, 2013 / Proposed Rules
individual negotiators who reflect the
diversity among program participants,
in accordance with section 492(b)(1) of
the HEA. Our goal is to establish a
committee that will allow significantly
affected parties to be represented while
keeping the committee size manageable.
The committee may create subgroups
on particular aspects of this topic that
may involve additional individuals who
are not members of the committee. Such
individuals who are not selected as
members of the committee will be able
to attend the meetings, have access to
the individuals representing their
constituencies, and participate in
informal working groups on various
issues between the meetings. The
committee meetings will be open to the
public.
Through the publication of future
Federal Register notices in the coming
months, we intend to establish
committees to address other rulemaking
issues.
Constituencies: We have identified
the following constituencies as having
interests that are significantly affected
by the topic proposed for negotiations.
The Department plans to seat as
negotiators individuals from
organizations or groups representing
these constituencies:
• Students.
• Legal assistance organizations that
represent students.
• Consumer advocacy organizations.
• Financial aid administrators at
postsecondary institutions.
• State higher education executive
officers.
• State attorneys general and other
appropriate State officials.
• Business and industry.
• Institutions of higher education
eligible to receive Federal assistance
under title III, Parts A, B, and F and title
V of the HEA, which include
Historically Black Colleges and
Universities, Hispanic-Serving
Institutions, American Indian Tribally
Controlled Colleges and Universities,
Alaska Native and Native HawaiianServing Institutions, Predominantly
Black Institutions, and other institutions
with a substantial enrollment of needy
students as defined in title III of the
HEA.
• Two-year public institutions of
higher education.
• Four-year public institutions of
higher education.
• Private, non-profit institutions of
higher education.
• Private, for-profit institutions of
higher education.
• Regional accrediting agencies.
• National accrediting agencies.
• Specialized accrediting agencies.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:54 Jun 11, 2013
Jkt 229001
The goal of the committee is to
develop proposed regulations that
reflect a final consensus of the
committee. Consensus means that there
is no dissent by any member of the
negotiating committee, including the
committee member representing the
Department. An individual selected as a
negotiator will be expected to represent
the interests of his or her organization
or group, and participate in the
negotiations in a manner consistent
with the goal of developing proposed
regulations on which the committee will
reach consensus. If consensus is
reached, all members of the organization
or group represented by a negotiator are
bound by the consensus and are
prohibited from commenting negatively
on the resulting proposed regulations.
The Department will not consider any
such negative comments that are
submitted by members of such an
organization or group.
Nominations: Nominations should
include:
• The name of the nominee, the
organization or group the nominee
represents, and a description of the
interests that the nominee represents.
• Evidence of the nominee’s expertise
or experience in the subject to be
negotiated.
• Evidence of support from
individuals or groups within the
constituency that the nominee will
represent.
• The nominee’s commitment that he
or she will actively participate in good
faith in the development of the
proposed regulations.
• The nominee’s contact information,
including address, phone number, fax
number, and email address.
For a better understanding of the
negotiated rulemaking process,
nominees should review The Negotiated
Rulemaking Process for Title IV
Regulations, Frequently Asked
Questions at https://www.ed.gov/policy/
highered/reg/hearulemaking/hea08/negreg-faq.html prior to committing to
serve as a negotiator.
Nominees will be notified whether or
not they have been selected as
negotiators as soon as the Department’s
review process is completed.
Schedule for Negotiations: The
committee will meet for two sessions on
the following dates:
Session 1: September 9–11, 2013.
Session 2: October 21–23, 2013.
Sessions will run from 9:00 a.m. to
5:00 p.m. on the first two days, and 9:00
a.m. to 12:00 p.m. on the last day.
The meetings will be held at the U.S.
Department of Education at: 1990 K
Street NW., Eighth Floor Conference
Center, Washington, DC 20006.
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
35181
Electronic Access to This Document:
The official version of this document is
the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register
and the Code of Federal Regulations is
available via the Federal Digital System
at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you
can view this document, as well as all
other documents of the Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF). To use PDF you must
have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at the site. You may also
access documents of the Department
published in the Federal Register by
using the article search feature at:
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically,
through the advanced search feature at
this site, you can limit your search to
documents published by the
Department.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1098a.
Dated: June 7, 2013.
Martha Kanter,
Under Secretary for Education.
[FR Doc. 2013–13975 Filed 6–11–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R08–OAR–2013–0395; FRL–9823–5]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Utah;
Revisions to Utah Administrative
Code—Permit: New and Modified
Sources
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to partially
approve and partially disapprove State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions
submitted by the State of Utah on
September 15, 2006. The September 15,
2006 revisions contain new, amended
and renumbered rules in Utah
Administrative Code (UAC) Title R–307
that pertain to the issuance of Utah air
quality permits. The September 15, 2006
revisions supersedes, in its entirety, and
replaces an October 9, 1998 submittal
that initially revised provisions in
Utah’s air quality permit program. In
this action, we are proposing to approve
all but four of the SIP revisions in the
September 15, 2006 submittal. We are
proposing to disapprove the State’s
rules, R307–401–7 (Public Notice),
R307–401–9(b) and portions of (c)
(Small Source Exemption), R307–401–
E:\FR\FM\12JNP1.SGM
12JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 113 (Wednesday, June 12, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 35179-35181]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-13975]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Chapter VI
[Docket ID ED-2013-OPE-0077]
Negotiated Rulemaking Committee, Negotiator Nominations and
Schedule of Committee Meetings--Title IV Federal Student Aid Programs,
Gainful Employment in a Recognized Occupation
AGENCY: Office of Postsecondary Education, Department of Education.
[[Page 35180]]
ACTION: Intention to establish negotiated rulemaking committee.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We announce our intention to establish a negotiated rulemaking
committee to prepare proposed regulations for the Federal Student Aid
programs authorized under title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965,
as amended (HEA) (title IV Federal Student Aid programs). The proposed
regulations would establish standards for programs that prepare
students for gainful employment in a recognized occupation. This
committee will include representatives of organizations or groups with
interests that are significantly affected by the subject matter of the
proposed regulations. We request nominations for individual negotiators
who represent key stakeholder constituencies for the issue to be
negotiated to serve on the committee and we set a schedule for
committee meetings.
The Department continues to review and appreciates and values the
testimony offered at the public hearings and the comments submitted
through the public comment process regarding other proposed rulemaking
topics, including: cash management of funds provided under title IV
Federal Student Aid programs; regulations designed to prevent fraud;
State authorization for programs offered through distance education or
correspondence education; State authorization for foreign locations of
institutions located in a State; clock to credit hour conversion;
changes made by the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2013
to the campus safety and security reporting requirements in the HEA;
the definition of ``adverse credit'' for borrowers in the Federal
Direct PLUS Loan Program; and campus-based Federal Student Aid program
reforms. We anticipate announcing our intention to establish a
negotiated rulemaking committee or committees to consider some or all
of these rulemaking issues in the coming months.
DATES: We must receive your nominations for negotiators to serve on the
committee on or before July 12, 2013. The dates, times, and locations
of the committee meetings are set out in the Schedule for Negotiations
section under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, below.
ADDRESSES: Please send your nominations for negotiators to Wendy
Macias, U.S. Department of Education, 1990 K Street NW., Room 8017,
Washington, DC 20006. Telephone: (202) 502-7526 or by email:
wendy.macias@ed.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information about the content of
this notice, including information about the negotiated rulemaking
process or the nomination submission process, contact: Wendy Macias,
U.S. Department of Education, 1990 K Street NW., room 8017, Washington,
DC 20006. Telephone: (202) 502-7526 or by email: wendy.macias@ed.gov.
For general information about the negotiated rulemaking process,
see The Negotiated Rulemaking Process for Title IV Regulations,
Frequently Asked Questions at https://www2.ed.gov/policy/highered/reg/hearulemaking/hea08/neg-reg-faq.html.
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf or text
telephone, call the Federal Relay Service, toll free, at 1-800-877-
8339.
Individuals with disabilities can obtain this document in an
accessible format (e.g., braille, large print, audiotape, or compact
disc) on request to the program contact person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 1, 2012, we published a notice in the
Federal Register (77 FR 25658) announcing our intent to establish a
negotiated rulemaking committee under section 492 of the HEA to develop
proposed regulations designed to prevent fraud and otherwise ensure
proper use of title IV Federal Student Aid program funds, especially
within the context of current technologies. In particular, we announced
our intent to propose regulations to address the use of debit cards and
other banking mechanisms for disbursing title IV Federal Student Aid
program funds, and to improve and streamline the campus-based Federal
Student Aid programs. We also announced two public hearings at which
interested parties could comment on the topics suggested by the
Department and suggest additional topics for consideration for action
by the negotiated rulemaking committee. Those hearings were held on May
23, 2012, in Phoenix, Arizona, and on May 31, 2012, in Washington, DC.
We invited parties to comment and submit topics for consideration in
writing as well.
On April 16, 2013, we published a notice in the Federal Register
(78 FR 2247), as corrected at 78 FR 25235, announcing additional topics
for consideration for action by the negotiated rulemaking committee.
The additional topics for consideration are: cash management of funds
provided under the title IV Federal Student Aid programs; State
authorization for programs offered through distance education or
correspondence education; State authorization for foreign locations of
institutions located in a State; clock to credit hour conversion;
gainful employment; changes made by the Violence Against Women
Reauthorization Act of 2013, Public Law 113-4, to the campus safety and
security reporting requirements in the HEA; and the definition of
``adverse credit'' for borrowers in the Federal Direct PLUS Loan
Program. We announced three public hearings at which interested parties
could comment on the new topics suggested by the Department and suggest
additional topics for consideration for action by the negotiating
committee. On May 13, 2013, we announced in the Federal Register (78 FR
27880) the addition of a fourth hearing. The hearings were held on May
21, 2013, in Washington, DC; May 23, 2013, in Minneapolis, Minnesota;
May 30, 2013, in San Francisco, California; and June 4, 2013, in
Atlanta, Georgia. We also invited parties unable to attend a public
hearing to submit written comments on the additional topics and to
submit other topics for consideration. Transcripts from all six public
hearings will be found once they are available at https://www2.ed.gov/policy/highered/reg/hearulemaking/2012/. Written comments
submitted in response to the May 1, 2012, and April 16, 2013, notices
may be viewed through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov. Instructions for finding comments are available on
the site under ``How to Use Regulations.gov'' in the Help section.
Individuals can enter docket ID ED-2012-OPE-0008 in the search box to
locate the appropriate docket.
Regulatory Issues: After consideration of the information received
at the regional hearings and the submitted written comments, we have
decided to establish, at this time, one negotiating committee to
prepare proposed regulations for the title IV Federal Student Aid
programs establishing standards for programs that prepare students for
gainful employment in a recognized occupation.
We intend to select negotiators for the committee who represent the
interests significantly affected by the establishment of standards for
programs that prepare students for gainful employment in a recognized
occupation. In so doing, we will follow the requirement in section
492(b)(1) of the HEA that the individuals selected must have
demonstrated expertise or experience in the relevant subject under
negotiation. We will also select
[[Page 35181]]
individual negotiators who reflect the diversity among program
participants, in accordance with section 492(b)(1) of the HEA. Our goal
is to establish a committee that will allow significantly affected
parties to be represented while keeping the committee size manageable.
The committee may create subgroups on particular aspects of this
topic that may involve additional individuals who are not members of
the committee. Such individuals who are not selected as members of the
committee will be able to attend the meetings, have access to the
individuals representing their constituencies, and participate in
informal working groups on various issues between the meetings. The
committee meetings will be open to the public.
Through the publication of future Federal Register notices in the
coming months, we intend to establish committees to address other
rulemaking issues.
Constituencies: We have identified the following constituencies as
having interests that are significantly affected by the topic proposed
for negotiations. The Department plans to seat as negotiators
individuals from organizations or groups representing these
constituencies:
Students.
Legal assistance organizations that represent students.
Consumer advocacy organizations.
Financial aid administrators at postsecondary
institutions.
State higher education executive officers.
State attorneys general and other appropriate State
officials.
Business and industry.
Institutions of higher education eligible to receive
Federal assistance under title III, Parts A, B, and F and title V of
the HEA, which include Historically Black Colleges and Universities,
Hispanic-Serving Institutions, American Indian Tribally Controlled
Colleges and Universities, Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian-Serving
Institutions, Predominantly Black Institutions, and other institutions
with a substantial enrollment of needy students as defined in title III
of the HEA.
Two-year public institutions of higher education.
Four-year public institutions of higher education.
Private, non-profit institutions of higher education.
Private, for-profit institutions of higher education.
Regional accrediting agencies.
National accrediting agencies.
Specialized accrediting agencies.
The goal of the committee is to develop proposed regulations that
reflect a final consensus of the committee. Consensus means that there
is no dissent by any member of the negotiating committee, including the
committee member representing the Department. An individual selected as
a negotiator will be expected to represent the interests of his or her
organization or group, and participate in the negotiations in a manner
consistent with the goal of developing proposed regulations on which
the committee will reach consensus. If consensus is reached, all
members of the organization or group represented by a negotiator are
bound by the consensus and are prohibited from commenting negatively on
the resulting proposed regulations. The Department will not consider
any such negative comments that are submitted by members of such an
organization or group.
Nominations: Nominations should include:
The name of the nominee, the organization or group the
nominee represents, and a description of the interests that the nominee
represents.
Evidence of the nominee's expertise or experience in the
subject to be negotiated.
Evidence of support from individuals or groups within the
constituency that the nominee will represent.
The nominee's commitment that he or she will actively
participate in good faith in the development of the proposed
regulations.
The nominee's contact information, including address,
phone number, fax number, and email address.
For a better understanding of the negotiated rulemaking process,
nominees should review The Negotiated Rulemaking Process for Title IV
Regulations, Frequently Asked Questions at https://www.ed.gov/policy/highered/reg/hearulemaking/hea08/neg-reg-faq.html prior to committing
to serve as a negotiator.
Nominees will be notified whether or not they have been selected as
negotiators as soon as the Department's review process is completed.
Schedule for Negotiations: The committee will meet for two sessions
on the following dates:
Session 1: September 9-11, 2013.
Session 2: October 21-23, 2013.
Sessions will run from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on the first two
days, and 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. on the last day.
The meetings will be held at the U.S. Department of Education at:
1990 K Street NW., Eighth Floor Conference Center, Washington, DC
20006.
Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this
document is the document published in the Federal Register. Free
Internet access to the official edition of the Federal Register and the
Code of Federal Regulations is available via the Federal Digital System
at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you can view this document, as well
as all other documents of the Department published in the Federal
Register, in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF). To use PDF
you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at the
site. You may also access documents of the Department published in the
Federal Register by using the article search feature at:
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search
feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published
by the Department.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1098a.
Dated: June 7, 2013.
Martha Kanter,
Under Secretary for Education.
[FR Doc. 2013-13975 Filed 6-11-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P