Final Priority; National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research-Advanced Rehabilitation Research Training Program, 34901-34902 [2013-13861]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 112 / Tuesday, June 11, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
improve the options for individuals
with disabilities to perform regular
activities of their choice in the
community.
Accessible Format: Individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document in
an accessible format (e.g., braille, large
print, audiotape, or compact disc) on
request to the program contact person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
Electronic Access to This Document:
The official version of this document is
the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register
and the Code of Federal Regulations is
available via the Federal Digital System
at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you
can view this document, as well as all
other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF). To use PDF you must
have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the
Department published in the Federal
Register by using the article search
feature at: www.federalregister.gov.
Specifically, through the advanced
search feature at this site, you can limit
your search to documents published by
the Department.
Dated: June 6, 2013.
Michael K. Yudin,
Delegated the authority to perform the
functions and duties of the Assistant
Secretary for Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services.
[FR Doc. 2013–13851 Filed 6–10–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Chapter III
[CFDA Number: 84.133P–1.]
Final Priority; National Institute on
Disability and Rehabilitation
Research—Advanced Rehabilitation
Research Training Program
Office of Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services, Department of
Education.
ACTION: Final priority.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Assistant Secretary for
Special Education and Rehabilitative
Services announces a priority for the
Advanced Rehabilitation Research
Training (ARRT) program under the
Disability and Rehabilitation Research
Projects and Centers Program
administered by the National Institute
on Disability and Rehabilitation
Research (NIDRR). The Assistant
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:08 Jun 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
Secretary may use this priority for
competitions in fiscal year (FY) 2013
and later years. We take this action to
ensure that NIDRR’s resources are
appropriately allocated across the three
outcome domains—community living
and participation, employment, and
health and function. We intend this
priority to (1) strengthen the capacity of
the disability and rehabilitation field to
train qualified individuals, including
individuals with disabilities, to conduct
high-quality, advanced
multidisciplinary rehabilitation
research; and (2) improve outcomes for
individuals with disabilities across the
domains of community living and
participation, employment, and health
and function.
DATES: Effective Date: This priority is
effective July 11, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marlene Spencer, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW.,
Room 5133, Potomac Center Plaza
(PCP), Washington, DC 20202–2700.
Telephone: (202) 245–7532 or by email:
marlene.spencer@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay
Service (FRS), toll free, at 1–800–877–
8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose of Program: The purpose of
the Disability and Rehabilitation
Research Projects and Centers Program
is to plan and conduct research,
demonstration projects, training, and
related activities, including
international activities, to develop
methods, procedures, and rehabilitation
technology that maximize the full
inclusion and integration into society,
employment, independent living, family
support, and economic and social selfsufficiency of individuals with
disabilities, especially individuals with
the most severe disabilities, and to
improve the effectiveness of services
authorized under the Rehabilitation Act
of 1973, as amended (Rehabilitation
Act).
Advanced Rehabilitation Research
Training
The purpose of NIDRR’s ARRT
program, which is funded through the
Disability and Rehabilitation Research
Projects and Centers Program, is to
provide advanced research training and
experience to individuals with
doctorates, or similar advanced degrees,
who have clinical or other relevant
experience. ARRT projects train
rehabilitation researchers, including
researchers with disabilities, with
particular attention to research areas
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
34901
that support the implementation and
objectives of the Rehabilitation Act, and
that improve the effectiveness of
services authorized under the
Rehabilitation Act.
Additional information on the ARRT
program can be found at: www.ed.gov/
rschstat/research/pubs/resprogram.html#ARRT.
Program Authority: 29 U.S.C. 762(g) and
764(a).
Applicable Program Regulations: 34
CFR part 350.
We published a notice of proposed
priority for this program in the Federal
Register on March 28, 2013 (78 FR
18933). That notice contained our
reasons for proposing the particular
priority and background information,
including on NIDRR’s major domains as
discussed in NIDRR’s Long-Range Plan
for Fiscal Years 2013–2017 (78 FR
20299).
Public Comment: In response to our
invitation in the notice of proposed
priority, we received two comments, but
neither was specific to the proposed
ARRT priority. We do not address
general comments that raised concerns
not directly related to the proposed
priority. There are no differences
between the proposed priority and this
final priority.
Final Priority
Advanced Rehabilitation Research
Training Program
The Assistant Secretary for Special
Education and Rehabilitative Services
announces a new priority for the
Advanced Rehabilitation Research
Training (ARRT) program. For FY 2013,
and potential subsequent years, ARRT
projects must provide advanced
research training to eligible individuals
to enhance their capacity to conduct
high-quality multidisciplinary
rehabilitation and disability research to
improve outcomes for individuals with
disabilities in one of NIDRR’s major
domains of individual well-being: (a)
Community living and participation, (b)
employment, or (c) health and function.
Types of Priorities
When inviting applications for a
competition using one or more
priorities, we designate the type of each
priority as absolute, competitive
preference, or invitational through a
notice in the Federal Register. The
effect of each type of priority follows:
Absolute priority: Under an absolute
priority, we consider only applications
that meet the priority (34 CFR
75.105(c)(3)).
Competitive preference priority:
Under a competitive preference priority,
E:\FR\FM\11JNR1.SGM
11JNR1
34902
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 112 / Tuesday, June 11, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
we give competitive preference to an
application by (1) awarding additional
points, depending on the extent to
which the application meets the priority
(34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i)); or (2) selecting
an application that meets the priority
over an application of comparable merit
that does not meet the priority (34 CFR
75.105(c)(2)(ii)).
Invitational priority: Under an
invitational priority, we are particularly
interested in applications that meet the
priority. However, we do not give an
application that meets the priority a
preference over other applications (34
CFR 75.105(c)(1)).
This notice does not preclude us from
proposing additional priorities,
requirements, definitions, or selection
criteria, subject to meeting applicable
rulemaking requirements.
Note: This notice does not solicit
applications. In any year in which we choose
to use this priority, we invite applications
through a notice in the Federal Register.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Regulatory Impact Analysis
Under Executive Order 12866, the
Secretary must determine whether this
regulatory action is ‘‘significant’’ and,
therefore, subject to the requirements of
the Executive order and subject to
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB). Section 3(f) of Executive
Order 12866 defines a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ as an action likely to
result in a rule that may—
(1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more, or
adversely affect a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
State, local, or tribal governments or
communities in a material way (also
referred to as an ‘‘economically
significant’’ rule);
(2) Create serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken
or planned by another agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary
impacts of entitlement grants, user fees,
or loan programs or the rights and
obligations of recipients thereof; or
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues
arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
stated in the Executive order.
This final regulatory action is not a
significant regulatory action subject to
review by OMB under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866.
We have also reviewed this regulatory
action under Executive Order 13563,
which supplements and explicitly
reaffirms the principles, structures, and
definitions governing regulatory review
established in Executive Order 12866.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:08 Jun 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
To the extent permitted by law,
Executive Order 13563 requires that an
agency—
(1) Propose or adopt regulations only
upon a reasoned determination that
their benefits justify their costs
(recognizing that some benefits and
costs are difficult to quantify);
(2) Tailor its regulations to impose the
least burden on society, consistent with
obtaining regulatory objectives and
taking into account—among other things
and to the extent practicable—the costs
of cumulative regulations;
(3) In choosing among alternative
regulatory approaches, select those
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety,
and other advantages; distributive
impacts; and equity);
(4) To the extent feasible, specify
performance objectives, rather than the
behavior or manner of compliance a
regulated entity must adopt; and
(5) Identify and assess available
alternatives to direct regulation,
including economic incentives—such as
user fees or marketable permits—to
encourage the desired behavior, or
provide information that enables the
public to make choices.
Executive Order 13563 also requires
an agency ‘‘to use the best available
techniques to quantify anticipated
present and future benefits and costs as
accurately as possible.’’ The Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs of
OMB has emphasized that these
techniques may include ‘‘identifying
changing future compliance costs that
might result from technological
innovation or anticipated behavioral
changes.’’
We are issuing this final priority only
upon a reasoned determination that its
benefits would justify its costs. In
choosing among alternative regulatory
approaches, we selected those
approaches that would maximize net
benefits. Based on the analysis that
follows, the Department believes that
this regulatory action is consistent with
the principles in Executive Order 13563.
We also have determined that this
regulatory action would not unduly
interfere with State, local, and tribal
governments in the exercise of their
governmental functions.
In accordance with both Executive
orders, the Department has assessed the
potential costs and benefits, both
quantitative and qualitative, of this
regulatory action. The potential costs
are those resulting from statutory
requirements and those we have
determined as necessary for
administering the Department’s
programs and activities.
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
The benefits of the Disability and
Rehabilitation Research Projects and
Centers Programs have been well
established over the years, as projects
similar to the one envisioned by the
final priority have been completed
successfully. Establishing new ARRT
projects based on the final priority
would strengthen the capacity of the
rehabilitation and disability field to
train qualified individuals, including
individuals with disabilities, to conduct
high-quality, advanced
multidisciplinary research across all of
NIDRR’s major domains of community
living and participation, employment,
and health and function, and thereby
contribute to advancing knowledge and
solving problems encountered by
individuals with disabilities of all ages.
Accessible Format: Individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document in
an accessible format (e.g., braille, large
print, audiotape, or compact disc) on
request to the program contact person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
Electronic Access to This Document:
The official version of this document is
the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register
and the Code of Federal Regulations is
available via the Federal Digital System
at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you
can view this document, as well as all
other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF). To use PDF you must
have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the
Department published in the Federal
Register by using the article search
feature at: www.federalregister.gov.
Specifically, through the advanced
search feature at this site, you can limit
your search to documents published by
the Department.
Dated: June 6, 2013.
Michael K. Yudin,
Delegated the authority to perform the
functions and the duties of the Assistant
Secretary for Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services.
[FR Doc. 2013–13861 Filed 6–10–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
E:\FR\FM\11JNR1.SGM
11JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 112 (Tuesday, June 11, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 34901-34902]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-13861]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Chapter III
[CFDA Number: 84.133P-1.]
Final Priority; National Institute on Disability and
Rehabilitation Research--Advanced Rehabilitation Research Training
Program
AGENCY: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services,
Department of Education.
ACTION: Final priority.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Assistant Secretary for Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services announces a priority for the Advanced
Rehabilitation Research Training (ARRT) program under the Disability
and Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program administered
by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research
(NIDRR). The Assistant Secretary may use this priority for competitions
in fiscal year (FY) 2013 and later years. We take this action to ensure
that NIDRR's resources are appropriately allocated across the three
outcome domains--community living and participation, employment, and
health and function. We intend this priority to (1) strengthen the
capacity of the disability and rehabilitation field to train qualified
individuals, including individuals with disabilities, to conduct high-
quality, advanced multidisciplinary rehabilitation research; and (2)
improve outcomes for individuals with disabilities across the domains
of community living and participation, employment, and health and
function.
DATES: Effective Date: This priority is effective July 11, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marlene Spencer, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., Room 5133, Potomac Center Plaza
(PCP), Washington, DC 20202-2700. Telephone: (202) 245-7532 or by
email: marlene.spencer@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 1-
800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose of Program: The purpose of the Disability and
Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program is to plan and
conduct research, demonstration projects, training, and related
activities, including international activities, to develop methods,
procedures, and rehabilitation technology that maximize the full
inclusion and integration into society, employment, independent living,
family support, and economic and social self-sufficiency of individuals
with disabilities, especially individuals with the most severe
disabilities, and to improve the effectiveness of services authorized
under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (Rehabilitation Act).
Advanced Rehabilitation Research Training
The purpose of NIDRR's ARRT program, which is funded through the
Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program, is
to provide advanced research training and experience to individuals
with doctorates, or similar advanced degrees, who have clinical or
other relevant experience. ARRT projects train rehabilitation
researchers, including researchers with disabilities, with particular
attention to research areas that support the implementation and
objectives of the Rehabilitation Act, and that improve the
effectiveness of services authorized under the Rehabilitation Act.
Additional information on the ARRT program can be found at:
www.ed.gov/rschstat/research/pubs/res-program.html#ARRT.
Program Authority: 29 U.S.C. 762(g) and 764(a).
Applicable Program Regulations: 34 CFR part 350.
We published a notice of proposed priority for this program in the
Federal Register on March 28, 2013 (78 FR 18933). That notice contained
our reasons for proposing the particular priority and background
information, including on NIDRR's major domains as discussed in NIDRR's
Long-Range Plan for Fiscal Years 2013-2017 (78 FR 20299).
Public Comment: In response to our invitation in the notice of
proposed priority, we received two comments, but neither was specific
to the proposed ARRT priority. We do not address general comments that
raised concerns not directly related to the proposed priority. There
are no differences between the proposed priority and this final
priority.
Final Priority
Advanced Rehabilitation Research Training Program
The Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative
Services announces a new priority for the Advanced Rehabilitation
Research Training (ARRT) program. For FY 2013, and potential subsequent
years, ARRT projects must provide advanced research training to
eligible individuals to enhance their capacity to conduct high-quality
multidisciplinary rehabilitation and disability research to improve
outcomes for individuals with disabilities in one of NIDRR's major
domains of individual well-being: (a) Community living and
participation, (b) employment, or (c) health and function.
Types of Priorities
When inviting applications for a competition using one or more
priorities, we designate the type of each priority as absolute,
competitive preference, or invitational through a notice in the Federal
Register. The effect of each type of priority follows:
Absolute priority: Under an absolute priority, we consider only
applications that meet the priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(3)).
Competitive preference priority: Under a competitive preference
priority,
[[Page 34902]]
we give competitive preference to an application by (1) awarding
additional points, depending on the extent to which the application
meets the priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i)); or (2) selecting an
application that meets the priority over an application of comparable
merit that does not meet the priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(ii)).
Invitational priority: Under an invitational priority, we are
particularly interested in applications that meet the priority.
However, we do not give an application that meets the priority a
preference over other applications (34 CFR 75.105(c)(1)).
This notice does not preclude us from proposing additional
priorities, requirements, definitions, or selection criteria, subject
to meeting applicable rulemaking requirements.
Note: This notice does not solicit applications. In any year in
which we choose to use this priority, we invite applications through
a notice in the Federal Register.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Regulatory Impact Analysis
Under Executive Order 12866, the Secretary must determine whether
this regulatory action is ``significant'' and, therefore, subject to
the requirements of the Executive order and subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Section 3(f) of Executive Order
12866 defines a ``significant regulatory action'' as an action likely
to result in a rule that may--
(1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more,
or adversely affect a sector of the economy, productivity, competition,
jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or
tribal governments or communities in a material way (also referred to
as an ``economically significant'' rule);
(2) Create serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an
action taken or planned by another agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary impacts of entitlement grants,
user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles stated in the
Executive order.
This final regulatory action is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by OMB under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866.
We have also reviewed this regulatory action under Executive Order
13563, which supplements and explicitly reaffirms the principles,
structures, and definitions governing regulatory review established in
Executive Order 12866. To the extent permitted by law, Executive Order
13563 requires that an agency--
(1) Propose or adopt regulations only upon a reasoned determination
that their benefits justify their costs (recognizing that some benefits
and costs are difficult to quantify);
(2) Tailor its regulations to impose the least burden on society,
consistent with obtaining regulatory objectives and taking into
account--among other things and to the extent practicable--the costs of
cumulative regulations;
(3) In choosing among alternative regulatory approaches, select
those approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health and safety, and other
advantages; distributive impacts; and equity);
(4) To the extent feasible, specify performance objectives, rather
than the behavior or manner of compliance a regulated entity must
adopt; and
(5) Identify and assess available alternatives to direct
regulation, including economic incentives--such as user fees or
marketable permits--to encourage the desired behavior, or provide
information that enables the public to make choices.
Executive Order 13563 also requires an agency ``to use the best
available techniques to quantify anticipated present and future
benefits and costs as accurately as possible.'' The Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs of OMB has emphasized that these
techniques may include ``identifying changing future compliance costs
that might result from technological innovation or anticipated
behavioral changes.''
We are issuing this final priority only upon a reasoned
determination that its benefits would justify its costs. In choosing
among alternative regulatory approaches, we selected those approaches
that would maximize net benefits. Based on the analysis that follows,
the Department believes that this regulatory action is consistent with
the principles in Executive Order 13563.
We also have determined that this regulatory action would not
unduly interfere with State, local, and tribal governments in the
exercise of their governmental functions.
In accordance with both Executive orders, the Department has
assessed the potential costs and benefits, both quantitative and
qualitative, of this regulatory action. The potential costs are those
resulting from statutory requirements and those we have determined as
necessary for administering the Department's programs and activities.
The benefits of the Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects
and Centers Programs have been well established over the years, as
projects similar to the one envisioned by the final priority have been
completed successfully. Establishing new ARRT projects based on the
final priority would strengthen the capacity of the rehabilitation and
disability field to train qualified individuals, including individuals
with disabilities, to conduct high-quality, advanced multidisciplinary
research across all of NIDRR's major domains of community living and
participation, employment, and health and function, and thereby
contribute to advancing knowledge and solving problems encountered by
individuals with disabilities of all ages.
Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this
document in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print,
audiotape, or compact disc) on request to the program contact person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this
document is the document published in the Federal Register. Free
Internet access to the official edition of the Federal Register and the
Code of Federal Regulations is available via the Federal Digital System
at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you can view this document, as well
as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal
Register, in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF). To use PDF
you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at the
site.
You may also access documents of the Department published in the
Federal Register by using the article search feature at:
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search
feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published
by the Department.
Dated: June 6, 2013.
Michael K. Yudin,
Delegated the authority to perform the functions and the duties of the
Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services.
[FR Doc. 2013-13861 Filed 6-10-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P