Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Order Cancellation Fee, 35082-35083 [2013-13772]
Download as PDF
35082
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 112 / Tuesday, June 11, 2013 / Notices
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of FINRA. All comments received
will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–FINRA–
2013–022 and should be submitted on
or before July 2, 2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.23
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–13774 Filed 6–10–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–69701; File No. SR–CHX–
2013–11]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.; Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness
of Proposed Rule Change To Amend
the Order Cancellation Fee
June 5, 2012.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that on May 31,
2013, the Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.
(‘‘CHX’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II and III
below, which Items have been prepared
by the self-regulatory organization. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of the Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
CHX proposes to amend its Schedule
of Participant Fees and Assessments
(the ‘‘Fee Schedule’’) to amend the
Order Cancellation Fee. The Exchange
proposes to implement the fee change
on June 3, 2013. The text of this
23 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 15 U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:13 Jun 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange’s Web site at https://
www.chx.com/rules/
proposed_rules.htm, at the principal
office of the Exchange, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend
Section E.8 of the Fee Schedule to
change the value of the Near order
multiplier (‘‘Nmult’’) from two (2) to four
(4) for all security-types and to replace
an obsolete citation. Under SR–CHX–
2012–15, the Exchange adopted the
current formula-based Order
Cancellation Fee, which assesses a daily
cancellation fee per Account Symbol,4 if
the order cancellation ratio exceeds a
designated threshold.5 In addition, the
Exchange adopted security-type specific
parameter values, such as the Nmult, in
order to permit the Exchange to make
adjustments to ensure equitable
application of the Order Cancellation
Fee.6 To this end, the Exchange noted in
footnote 10 of SR–CHX–2012–15 that
‘‘changes to any of the proposed
parameter values, including Order
Cancellation Fee, Cancellation Ratio,
Threshold Away Amount, Minimum
Duration and Nmult, will be made
through proposed fee filings pursuant to
Rule 19b–4.’’ 7
The Nmult, was adopted because the
Exchange recognized that, inter alia,
Wide orders (i.e. orders that are less
marketable), as well as Near orders (i.e.
orders that are more marketable), can be
4 A CHX ‘‘Account Symbol’’ is similar to the
Market Participant Identifiers (‘‘MPID’’) issued by
the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 68219
(November 13, 2012), 77 FR 69673 (November 20,
2012) (SR–CHX–2012–15); see also Section E.8 of
the Fee Schedule.
6 Id.
7 Id.
PO 00000
Frm 00109
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
utilized to promote display liquidity.
Thus, the purpose of the Nmult is to
allow the Exchange to multiply the
mitigating affect of Near orders on Wide
orders and by extension, the overall
order cancellation ratio. Practically
speaking, a higher Nmult, will result in a
lower order cancellation ratio and
thereby allow more Wide orders to be
placed before an order cancellation fee
is assessed.
Based on an analysis of nearly seven
months of data, the Exchange has
determined that the Nmult of two (2) is
overly restrictive. For instance, the
Exchange observed that a Participant
was submitting and cancelling a
significant number of Wide orders as
part of a trading strategy designed to
follow rapid changes to the National
Best Bid and Offer (‘‘NBBO’’). When
these cancellations were viewed within
the totality of the trading strategy, the
Exchange discovered that the Wide
order cancellations were necessary to
provide valuable display liquidity to the
Exchange. After analyzing the trading
activity of this Participant and other
Participants, the Exchange determined
that by increasing the Nmult value to four
(4) for all security-types, the application
of the Order Cancellation Fee will be
adequately relaxed to better promote
display liquidity. Consequently, the
Exchange has decided to forego some
Order Cancellation Fees that would be
lost by increasing the Nmult in favor of
promoting display liquidity.
Moreover, the Exchange proposes to
replace an obsolete citation to the ‘‘Do
Not Display’’ order display modifier
with the correct citation to Article 1,
Rule 2(c)(2).
The Exchange proposes to make these
amendments to Section E.8 effective
June 3, 2013. The formula by which the
cancellation fee is derived shall
continue to be calculated and made
available to Participants daily, but billed
after the end of the month.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b) of the Act 8 in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4)
of the Act 9 in particular, in that it
provides for the equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees and other charges
among members and other persons
using any facility or system which the
Exchange operates or controls. The
Exchange believes that the amendment
to the Nmult described herein should
help to recoup some of the costs of
administering and processing large
8 15
9 15
E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78f.
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
11JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 112 / Tuesday, June 11, 2013 / Notices
numbers of cancelled orders while fairly
allocating costs among Participants
according to system use. In addition,
these changes to the Fee Schedule
would equitably allocate reasonable fees
among Participants in a nondiscriminatory manner by properly
imposing fees on those Participants
which enter and subsequently cancel
orders above a fixed threshold while not
imposing fees on Participants that do
not exceed this threshold.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
proposed change to increase the Nmult
value from two (2) to four (4) for all
security-types contributes to the
protection of investors and the public
interest by promoting display liquidity
on the Exchange. Since the Exchange
does not propose to otherwise
substantively modify the Order
Cancellation Fee, the proposed change
will not impose any burden on
competition.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change is effective
upon filing pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act 10 and
subparagraph(f)(2) of Rule 19b–4
thereunder 11 because it establishes or
changes a due, fee or other charge
imposed by the Exchange.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
10 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
11 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:13 Jun 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–CHX–2013–11 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CHX–2013–11. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used.
To help the Commission process and
review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The
Commission will post all comments on
the Commission’s Internet Web site
(https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
offices of CHX. All comments received
will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–CHX–
2013–11, and should be submitted on or
before July 2, 2013.
Frm 00110
Fmt 4703
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.12
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–13772 Filed 6–10–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Electronic Comments
PO 00000
35083
Sfmt 4703
[Release No. 34–69700; File No. SR–
NASDAQ–2013–080]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change To Adopt Fees
for the MOPB Routing Option under
Rule 7018(a)
June 5, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on May 24,
2013 The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
(‘‘NASDAQ’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) a
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange.
The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested
persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
NASDAQ proposes to adopt fees for
the new MOPB routing option under
Rule 7018(a). The Exchange has
designated the proposed changes as
immediately effective, and proposes to
implement the changes effective with
the implementation of the MOPB order
on June 14, 2013. The text of the
proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange’s Web site at https://
www.nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission,
NASDAQ included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for,
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
12 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM
11JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 112 (Tuesday, June 11, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35082-35083]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-13772]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-69701; File No. SR-CHX-2013-11]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Amend the Order Cancellation Fee
June 5, 2012.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby given
that on May 31, 2013, the Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc. (``CHX'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
CHX proposes to amend its Schedule of Participant Fees and
Assessments (the ``Fee Schedule'') to amend the Order Cancellation Fee.
The Exchange proposes to implement the fee change on June 3, 2013. The
text of this proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web
site at https://www.chx.com/rules/proposed_rules.htm, at the principal
office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend Section E.8 of the Fee Schedule to
change the value of the Near order multiplier (``Nmult'')
from two (2) to four (4) for all security-types and to replace an
obsolete citation. Under SR-CHX-2012-15, the Exchange adopted the
current formula-based Order Cancellation Fee, which assesses a daily
cancellation fee per Account Symbol,\4\ if the order cancellation ratio
exceeds a designated threshold.\5\ In addition, the Exchange adopted
security-type specific parameter values, such as the Nmult,
in order to permit the Exchange to make adjustments to ensure equitable
application of the Order Cancellation Fee.\6\ To this end, the Exchange
noted in footnote 10 of SR-CHX-2012-15 that ``changes to any of the
proposed parameter values, including Order Cancellation Fee,
Cancellation Ratio, Threshold Away Amount, Minimum Duration and
Nmult, will be made through proposed fee filings pursuant to
Rule 19b-4.'' \7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ A CHX ``Account Symbol'' is similar to the Market
Participant Identifiers (``MPID'') issued by the Financial Industry
Regulatory Authority.
\5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 68219 (November 13,
2012), 77 FR 69673 (November 20, 2012) (SR-CHX-2012-15); see also
Section E.8 of the Fee Schedule.
\6\ Id.
\7\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Nmult, was adopted because the Exchange recognized
that, inter alia, Wide orders (i.e. orders that are less marketable),
as well as Near orders (i.e. orders that are more marketable), can be
utilized to promote display liquidity. Thus, the purpose of the
Nmult is to allow the Exchange to multiply the mitigating
affect of Near orders on Wide orders and by extension, the overall
order cancellation ratio. Practically speaking, a higher
Nmult, will result in a lower order cancellation ratio and
thereby allow more Wide orders to be placed before an order
cancellation fee is assessed.
Based on an analysis of nearly seven months of data, the Exchange
has determined that the Nmult of two (2) is overly
restrictive. For instance, the Exchange observed that a Participant was
submitting and cancelling a significant number of Wide orders as part
of a trading strategy designed to follow rapid changes to the National
Best Bid and Offer (``NBBO''). When these cancellations were viewed
within the totality of the trading strategy, the Exchange discovered
that the Wide order cancellations were necessary to provide valuable
display liquidity to the Exchange. After analyzing the trading activity
of this Participant and other Participants, the Exchange determined
that by increasing the Nmult value to four (4) for all
security-types, the application of the Order Cancellation Fee will be
adequately relaxed to better promote display liquidity. Consequently,
the Exchange has decided to forego some Order Cancellation Fees that
would be lost by increasing the Nmult in favor of promoting
display liquidity.
Moreover, the Exchange proposes to replace an obsolete citation to
the ``Do Not Display'' order display modifier with the correct citation
to Article 1, Rule 2(c)(2).
The Exchange proposes to make these amendments to Section E.8
effective June 3, 2013. The formula by which the cancellation fee is
derived shall continue to be calculated and made available to
Participants daily, but billed after the end of the month.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act \8\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act \9\ in particular, in that it
provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and
other charges among members and other persons using any facility or
system which the Exchange operates or controls. The Exchange believes
that the amendment to the Nmult described herein should help
to recoup some of the costs of administering and processing large
[[Page 35083]]
numbers of cancelled orders while fairly allocating costs among
Participants according to system use. In addition, these changes to the
Fee Schedule would equitably allocate reasonable fees among
Participants in a non-discriminatory manner by properly imposing fees
on those Participants which enter and subsequently cancel orders above
a fixed threshold while not imposing fees on Participants that do not
exceed this threshold.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed change to
increase the Nmult value from two (2) to four (4) for all
security-types contributes to the protection of investors and the
public interest by promoting display liquidity on the Exchange. Since
the Exchange does not propose to otherwise substantively modify the
Order Cancellation Fee, the proposed change will not impose any burden
on competition.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \10\ and subparagraph(f)(2) of Rule
19b-4 thereunder \11\ because it establishes or changes a due, fee or
other charge imposed by the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
\11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-CHX-2013-11 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CHX-2013-11. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site
viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F
Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090, on official business days
between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing
also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal
offices of CHX. All comments received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CHX-
2013-11, and should be submitted on or before July 2, 2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-13772 Filed 6-10-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P