Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Depository Trust Company; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change in Connection With the Modifications to Receiver Authorized Delivery and Reclaim Processing Value Limits by Transaction, 33876-33877 [2013-13273]
Download as PDF
33876
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 108 / Wednesday, June 5, 2013 / Notices
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.19
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–13275 Filed 6–4–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–69666; File No. SR–DTC–
2013–04]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
Depository Trust Company; Notice of
Filing of Proposed Rule Change in
Connection With the Modifications to
Receiver Authorized Delivery and
Reclaim Processing Value Limits by
Transaction
May 30, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on May 17,
2013, The Depository Trust Company
(‘‘DTC’’) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’)
the proposed rule change as described
in Items I, II and III below, which Items
have been prepared primarily by DTC.
The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested
persons.
I. Clearing Agency’s Statement of the
Terms of Substance of the Proposed
Rule Change
The proposed rule change modifies
DTC’s Rules & Procedures (‘‘Rules’’), as
described below, with respect to
Receiver Authorized Delivery (‘‘RAD’’)
and reclaim transactions, to: (i) Lower
limits against which valued Deliver
Orders (‘‘DO’’) and Payment Orders
(‘‘PO’’) will be required to be accepted
for receipt (i.e., ‘‘matched’’ for
settlement), (ii) lower limits for same
day reclaim transactions, and (iii) revise
the process for RAD matching of stock
loans and returns, each as more fully
described below.3
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
19 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 A Deliver Order is a book-entry movement of a
particular security between two DTC participants.
A Payment Order is a method for settling funds
amounts related to transactions and payments not
associated with a Deliver Order. The defined term
‘‘DO’’ as used in this proposed rule change filing
includes all valued Deliver Orders except for
Deliver Orders of: (i) Money Market Instruments
and (ii) Institutional Deliveries affirmed through
Omgeo, both of which are not impacted by the
proposed Rule change.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:43 Jun 04, 2013
Jkt 229001
II. Clearing Agency’s Statement of the
Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the
Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission,
DTC included statements concerning
the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. DTC has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections (A), (B),
and (C) below, of the most significant
aspects of these statements.4
(A) Clearing Agency’s Statement of the
Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the
Proposed Rule Change
(i) By this filing, DTC seeks to modify
the RAD functionality as more fully
described below to reduce the intraday
uncertainty that may arise from reclaim
transactions and any potential credit
and liquidity risk from such reclaims.
All valued DOs and POs valued in
amounts above $15 million and $1
million, respectively, are subject to the
RAD process, which allows receivers to
review and reject transactions that they
do not recognize prior to processing for
delivery. In contrast, lower value DOs
and POs do not require the receiver’s
acceptance prior to processing in
accordance with DTC’s Rules; instead,
such transactions may be returned by
the receiver in a reclaim transaction, if
the receiver does not recognize the DO
or PO. While both the reclaim and RAD
functionalities allow receiving DTC
participants (‘‘Participants’’) to exercise
control over which transactions to
accept, reclaims tend to create
uncertainty because transactions can be
returned late in the day, when the
original deliverer may have limited
options to respond. Because such
reclaims are permitted without regard to
risk management controls, the
Participant that initiated the original
delivery versus payment may then incur
a greater settlement obligation,
increasing credit and liquidity risk to
that Participant and to the Corporation.5
For these reasons, DTC states that presettlement matching through RAD is a
4 The Commission has modified the text of the
summaries prepared by DTC.
5 DTC’s risk management controls, including
Collateral Monitor and Net Debit Cap (as defined in
DTC Rule 1), are designed so that DTC can effect
system-wide settlement notwithstanding the failure
to settle of its largest Participant or affiliated family
of Participants. Net Debit Cap limits the net debit
balance a Participant can incur so that the unpaid
settlement obligation of the Participant, if any,
cannot exceed DTC liquidity resources. The
Collateral Monitor tests that a receiver has adequate
collateral to secure the amount of its net debit
balance so that DTC may borrow funds to cover that
amount for system-wide settlement if the
Participant defaults.
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
preferable approach, without the
uncertainty and credit and liquidity
implications of reclaims. Under this
proposal, DTC will change RAD to
require Participants to match all
settlement-related transactions valued
greater than $7.5 million for valued DOs
and $500,000 for POs, prior to
processing. Matched transactions will
be processed through DTC subject to
risk management controls.6
Concurrently, the value of reclaims that
may bypass risk management controls
will be reduced to $7.5 million for
valued DOs and $500,000 for POs.
DTC is also proposing a further
revision to RAD for stock loan and stock
loan return transactions. Currently,
Participants may set bilateral and global
limits for transactions subject to RAD
which allow transactions with
settlement values that are greater than
DTC’s default limits, but less than the
Participant’s defined bilateral and/or
global limits, to be passively approved.7
Any established limits apply to all
transactions with the applicable
counterparties (on either a bilateral or
global basis) for all transaction types
subject to RAD. However, stock loan
transactions (and stock loan returns) are
often different from ordinary buys and
sells, because stock loans are often
agreed upon on a same-day basis (as
opposed to T+3 settlement of purchases
and sales). Taking this difference into
account, in addition to the revisions
described above, the proposed Rule
changes will allow receiving
Participants to establish bilateral and
global RAD limits for stock loans and
stock loan returns that are different from
other transaction types.8
The DTC Settlement Services Guide
will be revised to reflect the changes
discussed above.
The effective date of the proposed
rule change will be announced via a
DTC Important Notice.
(ii) Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act
requires that the rules of the clearing
agency be designed, inter alia, to
6 Each reclaim of a matched transaction that is
attempted will be processed as an original
instruction and be subject to risk management
controls and receiver approval (the original
deliverer) via RAD.
7 A bilateral limit established by a Participant
applies to transactions from a specified deliverer. A
global limit established by a Participant is applied
to all valued DOs and POs to the Participant not
otherwise subject to a bilateral limit. Transactions
passively approved under such limits may not be
reclaimed.
8 The use of a stock lending and return profile
will be voluntary and, absent a profile, the
Participant’s transactions will be subject to RAD as
applicable to ordinary DOs, including the
established DTC limits as well as Participant
established bilateral and global limits as described
above.
E:\FR\FM\05JNN1.SGM
05JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 108 / Wednesday, June 5, 2013 / Notices
promote the prompt and accurate
clearance and settlement of securities
transactions. The proposed rule change
is designed to promote the prompt and
accurate clearance and settlement of
securities transactions by increasing the
number of deliveries which will be
required to be approved by the receiving
Participant prior to DTC processing,
which will enhance settlement
certainty.
(B) Clearing Agency’s Statement on
Burden on Competition
DTC does not believe that the
proposed rule change will have any
impact or impose any burden on
competition.
(C) Clearing Agency’s Statement on
Comments on the Proposed Rule
Change Received From Members,
Participants or Others
Written comments relating to the
proposed rule change have not been
solicited or received. DTC will notify
the Commission of any written
comments received by DTC.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period
up to 90 days (i) as the Commission may
designate if it finds such longer period
to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which
the self-regulatory organization
consents, the Commission will:
(A) by order approve or disapprove
the proposed rule change or
(B) institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml) or send an email to
rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR–DTC–2013–04 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:43 Jun 04, 2013
Jkt 229001
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–DTC–2013–04. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Section, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filings will also be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of DTC and on DTC’s Web site at
https://www.dtcc.com/downloads/legal/
rule_filings/2013/dtc/SR-DTC-201304.pdf.
All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–DTC–2013–04 and should
be submitted on or before June 26, 2013.
For the Commission by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.9
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–13273 Filed 6–4–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–69671; File No. SR–Phlx–
2013–59]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change To Apply a
Strategy Fee Cap to Jelly Rolls
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
33877
notice is hereby given that on May 21,
2013 NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC (‘‘Phlx’’
or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or
‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III, below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to adopt a
strategy fee cap applicable to jelly rolls.
While changes to the Pricing
Schedule pursuant to this proposal are
effective upon filing, the Exchange has
designated the proposed amendment to
be operative on May 22, 2013.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s Web site
at https://
nasdaqomxphlx.cchwallstreet.com/, at
the principal office of the Exchange, on
the Commission’s Web site at https://
www.sec.gov, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of this filing is to amend
the strategy fee caps which are currently
located in Section II, entitled ‘‘Multiply
Listed Options’’ 3 Today, the Exchange
caps certain dividend, merger, short
stock interest and reversal and
conversion floor option transactions.
The Exchange is proposing to also cap
jelly roll strategies.
A jelly roll strategy is defined as
transactions created by entering into
two separate positions simultaneously.
One position involves buying a put and
9 17
1 15
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
3 This includes options overlying equities, ETFs,
ETNs and indexes which are Multiply Listed.
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\05JNN1.SGM
05JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 108 (Wednesday, June 5, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33876-33877]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-13273]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-69666; File No. SR-DTC-2013-04]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Depository Trust Company;
Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change in Connection With the
Modifications to Receiver Authorized Delivery and Reclaim Processing
Value Limits by Transaction
May 30, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on May 17, 2013, The Depository Trust Company (``DTC'') filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II and III below, which Items have been
prepared primarily by DTC. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Clearing Agency's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the
Proposed Rule Change
The proposed rule change modifies DTC's Rules & Procedures
(``Rules''), as described below, with respect to Receiver Authorized
Delivery (``RAD'') and reclaim transactions, to: (i) Lower limits
against which valued Deliver Orders (``DO'') and Payment Orders
(``PO'') will be required to be accepted for receipt (i.e., ``matched''
for settlement), (ii) lower limits for same day reclaim transactions,
and (iii) revise the process for RAD matching of stock loans and
returns, each as more fully described below.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ A Deliver Order is a book-entry movement of a particular
security between two DTC participants. A Payment Order is a method
for settling funds amounts related to transactions and payments not
associated with a Deliver Order. The defined term ``DO'' as used in
this proposed rule change filing includes all valued Deliver Orders
except for Deliver Orders of: (i) Money Market Instruments and (ii)
Institutional Deliveries affirmed through Omgeo, both of which are
not impacted by the proposed Rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Clearing Agency's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis
for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, DTC included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. DTC has prepared summaries, set forth in sections (A),
(B), and (C) below, of the most significant aspects of these
statements.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The Commission has modified the text of the summaries
prepared by DTC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(A) Clearing Agency's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis
for, the Proposed Rule Change
(i) By this filing, DTC seeks to modify the RAD functionality as
more fully described below to reduce the intraday uncertainty that may
arise from reclaim transactions and any potential credit and liquidity
risk from such reclaims.
All valued DOs and POs valued in amounts above $15 million and $1
million, respectively, are subject to the RAD process, which allows
receivers to review and reject transactions that they do not recognize
prior to processing for delivery. In contrast, lower value DOs and POs
do not require the receiver's acceptance prior to processing in
accordance with DTC's Rules; instead, such transactions may be returned
by the receiver in a reclaim transaction, if the receiver does not
recognize the DO or PO. While both the reclaim and RAD functionalities
allow receiving DTC participants (``Participants'') to exercise control
over which transactions to accept, reclaims tend to create uncertainty
because transactions can be returned late in the day, when the original
deliverer may have limited options to respond. Because such reclaims
are permitted without regard to risk management controls, the
Participant that initiated the original delivery versus payment may
then incur a greater settlement obligation, increasing credit and
liquidity risk to that Participant and to the Corporation.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ DTC's risk management controls, including Collateral Monitor
and Net Debit Cap (as defined in DTC Rule 1), are designed so that
DTC can effect system-wide settlement notwithstanding the failure to
settle of its largest Participant or affiliated family of
Participants. Net Debit Cap limits the net debit balance a
Participant can incur so that the unpaid settlement obligation of
the Participant, if any, cannot exceed DTC liquidity resources. The
Collateral Monitor tests that a receiver has adequate collateral to
secure the amount of its net debit balance so that DTC may borrow
funds to cover that amount for system-wide settlement if the
Participant defaults.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For these reasons, DTC states that pre-settlement matching through
RAD is a preferable approach, without the uncertainty and credit and
liquidity implications of reclaims. Under this proposal, DTC will
change RAD to require Participants to match all settlement-related
transactions valued greater than $7.5 million for valued DOs and
$500,000 for POs, prior to processing. Matched transactions will be
processed through DTC subject to risk management controls.\6\
Concurrently, the value of reclaims that may bypass risk management
controls will be reduced to $7.5 million for valued DOs and $500,000
for POs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Each reclaim of a matched transaction that is attempted will
be processed as an original instruction and be subject to risk
management controls and receiver approval (the original deliverer)
via RAD.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DTC is also proposing a further revision to RAD for stock loan and
stock loan return transactions. Currently, Participants may set
bilateral and global limits for transactions subject to RAD which allow
transactions with settlement values that are greater than DTC's default
limits, but less than the Participant's defined bilateral and/or global
limits, to be passively approved.\7\ Any established limits apply to
all transactions with the applicable counterparties (on either a
bilateral or global basis) for all transaction types subject to RAD.
However, stock loan transactions (and stock loan returns) are often
different from ordinary buys and sells, because stock loans are often
agreed upon on a same-day basis (as opposed to T+3 settlement of
purchases and sales). Taking this difference into account, in addition
to the revisions described above, the proposed Rule changes will allow
receiving Participants to establish bilateral and global RAD limits for
stock loans and stock loan returns that are different from other
transaction types.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ A bilateral limit established by a Participant applies to
transactions from a specified deliverer. A global limit established
by a Participant is applied to all valued DOs and POs to the
Participant not otherwise subject to a bilateral limit. Transactions
passively approved under such limits may not be reclaimed.
\8\ The use of a stock lending and return profile will be
voluntary and, absent a profile, the Participant's transactions will
be subject to RAD as applicable to ordinary DOs, including the
established DTC limits as well as Participant established bilateral
and global limits as described above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The DTC Settlement Services Guide will be revised to reflect the
changes discussed above.
The effective date of the proposed rule change will be announced
via a DTC Important Notice.
(ii) Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act requires that the rules of the
clearing agency be designed, inter alia, to
[[Page 33877]]
promote the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities
transactions. The proposed rule change is designed to promote the
prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions
by increasing the number of deliveries which will be required to be
approved by the receiving Participant prior to DTC processing, which
will enhance settlement certainty.
(B) Clearing Agency's Statement on Burden on Competition
DTC does not believe that the proposed rule change will have any
impact or impose any burden on competition.
(C) Clearing Agency's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change
Received From Members, Participants or Others
Written comments relating to the proposed rule change have not been
solicited or received. DTC will notify the Commission of any written
comments received by DTC.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period up to 90 days (i) as the
Commission may designate if it finds such longer period to be
appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
(A) by order approve or disapprove the proposed rule change or
(B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml) or send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov.
Please include File Number SR-DTC-2013-04 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-DTC-2013-04. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Section, 100 F Street
NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours
of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filings will also be
available for inspection and copying at the principal office of DTC and
on DTC's Web site at https://www.dtcc.com/downloads/legal/rule_filings/2013/dtc/SR-DTC-2013-04.pdf.
All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission
does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You
should submit only information that you wish to make available
publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-DTC-2013-04
and should be submitted on or before June 26, 2013.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
For the Commission by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-13273 Filed 6-4-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P