Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, 32464-32467 [2013-12733]

Download as PDF 32464 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 104 / Thursday, May 30, 2013 / Notices eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers and former workers of ICG Knott County Coal, LLC, a subsidiary of ICG, Inc., Kite, Kentucky (subject firm). The negative determination was issued on April 30, 2013. The workers’ firm is engaged in activities related to the production of bituminous coal. The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination based on the findings that imports of articles like or directly competitive with the articles produced by the workers did not increase during the relevant period; neither the subject firm nor its major customers increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with the articles produced by the subject workers; the subject firm did not shift production of like or directly competitive articles to a foreign country, and did not acquire production of like or directly competitive articles from a foreign country; the subject firm is neither a Supplier nor Downstream Producer to a firm (or subdivision, whichever is applicable) that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2272(a); and the subject firm has not been publically identified by name by the International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an investigation resulting in an affirmative finding of serious injury, market disruption, or material injury, or threat thereof. The request for reconsideration included new information regarding the articles produced by the petitioning worker group. The Department has carefully reviewed the request for reconsideration and the existing record, and will conduct further investigation to determine if workers have met the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. Conclusion TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. Department of Labor’s prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted. Signed at Washington, DC, this 16th day of May, 2013. Del Min Amy Chen, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2013–12736 Filed 5–29–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:25 May 29, 2013 Jkt 229001 Signed at Washington, DC this 14th day of May 2013. Michael W. Jaffe, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–82,471] [FR Doc. 2013–12731 Filed 5–29–13; 8:45 am] Amantea Nonwovens, LLC, Including On-Site Leased Workers From Express Employment Professionals, The Job Store, and Staffmark, Cincinnati, Ohio; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on February 25, 2013, applicable to workers of Amantea Nonwovens, L.L.C. including on-site leased workers from Express Employment Professionals and The Job Store, Cincinnati, Ohio. The workers are engaged in activities related to the production of nonwoven diaper components. The notice was published in the Federal Register on March 26, 2013 (78 FR 18367). At the request of a company official, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. New information from the company shows that workers leased from Staffmark were employed on-site at the Cincinnati, Ohio location of Amantea Nonwovens, L.L.C. The Department has determined that these workers were sufficiently under the control of Amantea Nonwovens, L.L.C. to be considered leased workers. The intent of the Department’s certification is to include all workers of the subject firm who were adversely affected by a shift in the production of nonwoven diaper components to China. Based on these findings, the Department is amending this certification to include workers leased from Staffmark working on-site at the Cincinnati, Ohio location of the subject firm. The amended notice applicable to TA–W–82,471 is hereby issued as follows: All workers from Amantea Nonwovens, L.L.C. including on-site leased workers from Express Employment Professionals, The Job Store and Staffmark, Cincinnati, Ohio, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after February 18, 2012, through March February 25, 2015, and all workers in the group threatened with total or partial separation from employment on date of certification through two years from the date of certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. PO 00000 Frm 00100 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers by (TA–W) number issued during the period of May 6, 2013 through May 10, 2013. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met. I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied: (1) a significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) the sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased absolutely; and (3) One of the following must be satisfied: (A) imports of articles or services like or directly competitive with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have increased; (B) imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are directly incorporated, have increased; (C) imports of articles directly incorporating one or more component parts produced outside the United States that are like or directly competitive with imports of articles incorporating one or more component parts produced by such firm have increased; (D) imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have increased; and (4) the increase in imports contributed importantly to such workers’ separation E:\FR\FM\30MYN1.SGM 30MYN1 32465 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 104 / Thursday, May 30, 2013 / Notices or threat of separation and to the decline in the sales or production of such firm; or II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be satisfied: (1) a significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) One of the following must be satisfied: (A) there has been a shift by the workers’ firm to a foreign country in the production of articles or supply of services like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; (B) there has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the workers’ firm of articles/services that are like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; and (3) the shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must be met. (1) a significant number or proportion of the workers in the public agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) the public agency has acquired from a foreign country services like or directly competitive with services which are supplied by such agency; and (3) the acquisition of services contributed importantly to such workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected secondary workers of a firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(c) of the Act must be met. (1) a significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) the workers’ firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or production is related to the article or service that was the basis for such certification; and (3) either— (A) the workers’ firm is a supplier and the component parts it supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the workers’ firm; or (B) a loss of business by the workers’ firm with the firm described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(f) of the Act must be met. (1) the workers’ firm is publicly identified by name by the International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an investigation resulting in— (A) an affirmative determination of serious injury or threat thereof under section 202(b)(1); (B) an affirmative determination of market disruption or threat thereof under section 421(b)(1); or (C) an affirmative final determination of material injury or threat thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A)); (2) the petition is filed during the 1year period beginning on the date on which— (A) a summary of the report submitted to the President by the International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is published in the Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); or (B) notice of an affirmative determination described in subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal Register; and (3) the workers have become totally or partially separated from the workers’ firm within— (A) the 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or (B) notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year period preceding the 1-year period described in paragraph (2). Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance The following certifications have been issued. The date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W No. Subject firm Location 82,496 ............... 82,496A ............ 82,496B ............ 82,496C ............ NewPage Corporation, Select Staffing ........................................... NewPage Wisconsin Systems, Inc., NewPage Corporation ........... NewPage Wisconsin Systems, Inc., NewPage Corporation ........... NewPage Wisconsin Systems, Inc., NewPage Corporation, Select Staffing. Luke Paper Company, NewPage Corporation, Select Staffing ...... Rumford Paper Company, NewPage Corporation, Select Staffing NewPage Wisconsin Systems, Inc., NewPage Corporation ........... WickliffePaper Company, Inc., NewPage Corporation, Select Staffing. Escanaba Paper Company, NewPage Corporation ....................... NAVTEQ North America, LLC ......................................................... Miamisburg, OH ......................... Duluth, MN ................................. Stevens Point, WI ....................... Wisconsin Rapids, WI ................ February February February February 22, 22, 22, 22, 2012. 2012. 2012. 2012. Luke, MD .................................... Rumford, ME .............................. Biron, WI ..................................... Wickliffe, KY ............................... February February February February 22, 22, 22, 22, 2012. 2012. 2012. 2012. Escanaba, MI ............................. Chicago, IL ................................. February 22, 2012. November 15, 2011. TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 82,496D ............ 82,496E ............ 82,496F ............. 82,496G ............ 82,496H ............ 82,192 ............... The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:25 May 29, 2013 Jkt 229001 services) of the Trade Act have been met. PO 00000 Frm 00101 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30MYN1.SGM 30MYN1 Impact date 32466 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 104 / Thursday, May 30, 2013 / Notices TA–W No. Subject firm Location 82,346 ............... Whirlpool Corporation, Aerotek/Tek Systems (Subcontractor of IBM Corporation). First Advantage Corporation, Tapfin, Staffworks, Aerotek Professional Services, Randstad, etc. Velux America, Inc., TVC Holdings, Inc. ......................................... LexisNexis/Matthew Bender, A Reed Elsevier, Not Including Customer Service and Fulfillment Depts. Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc., Taiyo Nippon Sanso, Electronics Division, Aerotek, Apple One, etc. Cooper Bussmann LLC, Cooper Industries, Inc., Accounts Receivable and Credit Group. Humana Insurance Company, Carenetwork, Inc., ASO Finance Group. SunTrust Bank, Enterprise Information Services, MDI Group, Teksystems, Insight Global. William Arthur, Inc., Manpower ....................................................... Aclara Technologies LLC, Esco Technologies, Integrity Staffing, Manpower, etc. ADP Workscape, Inc., ADP Inc., Aerotek ....................................... Dresser Masoneilan Massachusetts Operation, An Effiliate of General Electric. Medline Industries, Inc .................................................................... Pfizer, Inc., Surveillance Testing Group Pfizer Global Supply, Makro Technologies, etc. Electrolux Home Care Products, Inc., Electrolux Major Appliances, Electrolux North America, Inc. Leased Workers From Cornerstone, Electrolux Home Care Products, Inc. Fort Smith, AR ............................ October 7, 2012. St. Petersburg, FL ...................... February 11, 2012. Greenwood, SC .......................... Albany, NY ................................. March 13, 2012. March 18, 2012. Newark, CA ................................ March 14, 2012. Ellisville, MO ............................... March 20, 2012. De Pere, WI ................................ April 4, 2012. Richmond, VA ............................ April 12, 2012. West Kennebunk, ME ................ Solon, OH ................................... April 17, 2012. April 22, 2012. Meridian, ID ................................ Avon, MA .................................... April 24, 2012. November 20, 2012. Clearwater, FL ............................ Groton, CT .................................. October 23, 2012. May 1, 2012. Webster City, IA ......................... February 16, 2013. Webster City, IA ......................... April 29, 2012. 82,455 ............... 82,560 ............... 82,571 ............... 82,593 ............... 82,610 ............... 82,631 ............... 82,658 ............... 82,665 ............... 82,682 ............... 82,692 ............... 82,693 ............... 82,699 ............... 82,701 ............... 82,702 ............... 82,702A ............ The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W No. Subject firm Location 82,621 ............... Lionbridge Technologies, Hewlett Packard Image Printer Group, Hewlett-Packard Company. Vancouver, MA ........................... Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met for the reasons specified. The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs (a)(2)(A) TA–W No. 82,241 ............... Alcoa Automotive, Indiana Assembly & Fabricating Center, Inc., IQ Navigator, Inc. Premier Silica LLC .......................................................................... BorgWarner Morse TEC, including On-Site Leased Workers from Manpower. BorgWarner Morse TEC, 800 Warren Road ................................... BorgWarner Morse TEC, 780 Warren Road ................................... Cinetech, Deluxe Laboratories, Inc., UI Wages Reported through Deluxe Media Services. JP Morgan Chase and Company, Community and Consumer Banking Division, Centralized Transaction Operations. 82,381A ............ 82,381B ............ 82,466 ............... TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 82,592 ............... Determinations Terminating Investigations of Petitions for Worker Adjustment Assistance After notice of the petitions was published in the Federal Register and VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:25 May 29, 2013 Jkt 229001 Location Frm 00102 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 March 15, 2012. Impact date Auburn, IN. Glenford, OH. Cortland, NY. Ithaca, NY. Ithaca, NY. Valencia, CA. Los Angeles, CA. on the Department’s Web site, as required by Section 221 of the Act (19 USC 2271), the Department initiated investigations of these petitions. PO 00000 Impact date (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services to a foreign country) of section 222 have not been met. Subject firm 82,258 ............... 82,381 ............... Impact date The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. E:\FR\FM\30MYN1.SGM 30MYN1 32467 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 104 / Thursday, May 30, 2013 / Notices TA–W No. Subject firm Location 82,669 ............... 82,710 ............... U.S. Textile Corporation .................................................................. Ochin, Inc. ....................................................................................... TA–W No. Kim Lighting, Hubbell Lighting, Inc ................................................. therefore, may not be part of a petitioning worker group. For one or more of these reasons, these petitions were deemed invalid. Subject firm 82,714 ............... The following determinations terminating investigations were issued Location NewPage Wisconsin Systems, Inc., Newpage Corporation ........... filed earlier covering the same petitioners. Subject firm 82,521 ............... I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued during the period of May 6, 2013 through May 10, 2013. These determinations are available on the Department’s Web site tradeact/taa/ taa_search_form.cfm under the searchable listing of determinations or by calling the Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance toll free at 888– 365–6822. Dated: May 16, 2013. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2013–12733 Filed 5–29–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers by (TA–W) number issued during the period of May 13, 2013 through May 17, 2013. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:25 May 29, 2013 Jkt 229001 Location Frm 00103 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Impact date Duluth, MN. eligibility requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met. I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied: (1) a significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) the sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased absolutely; and (3) One of the following must be satisfied: (A) imports of articles or services like or directly competitive with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have increased; (B) imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are directly incorporated, have increased; (C) imports of articles directly incorporating one or more component parts produced outside the United States that are like or directly competitive with imports of articles incorporating one or more component parts produced by such firm have increased; (D) imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have increased; and (4) the increase in imports contributed importantly to such workers’ separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the sales or production of such firm; or II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be satisfied: PO 00000 Impact date Ontario, CA. because the petitions are the subject of ongoing investigations under petitions TA–W No. TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Newland, NC. Portland, OR. by at least three individuals of the petitioning worker group. Petitioners separated more than one year prior to the date of the petition cannot be covered under a certification of a petition under Section 223(b), and The following determinations terminating investigations were issued in cases where these petitions were not filed in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 90.11. Every petition filed by workers must be signed Impact date (1) a significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) One of the following must be satisfied: (A) there has been a shift by the workers’ firm to a foreign country in the production of articles or supply of services like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; (B) there has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the workers’ firm of articles/services that are like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; and (3) the shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must be met. (1) a significant number or proportion of the workers in the public agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) the public agency has acquired from a foreign country services like or directly competitive with services which are supplied by such agency; and (3) the acquisition of services contributed importantly to such workers’ separation or threat of separation. E:\FR\FM\30MYN1.SGM 30MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 104 (Thursday, May 30, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32464-32467]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-12733]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment
assistance for workers by (TA-W) number issued during the period of May
6, 2013 through May 10, 2013.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to
apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility
requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied:
(1) a significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) the sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased
absolutely; and
(3) One of the following must be satisfied:
(A) imports of articles or services like or directly competitive
with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have
increased;
(B) imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles
into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are
directly incorporated, have increased;
(C) imports of articles directly incorporating one or more
component parts produced outside the United States that are like or
directly competitive with imports of articles incorporating one or more
component parts produced by such firm have increased;
(D) imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles
which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have
increased; and
(4) the increase in imports contributed importantly to such
workers' separation

[[Page 32465]]

or threat of separation and to the decline in the sales or production
of such firm; or
II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be satisfied:
(1) a significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) One of the following must be satisfied:
(A) there has been a shift by the workers' firm to a foreign
country in the production of articles or supply of services like or
directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm;
(B) there has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the
workers' firm of articles/services that are like or directly
competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm; and
(3) the shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers'
separation or threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must
be met.
(1) a significant number or proportion of the workers in the public
agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to
become totally or partially separated;
(2) the public agency has acquired from a foreign country services
like or directly competitive with services which are supplied by such
agency; and
(3) the acquisition of services contributed importantly to such
workers' separation or threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected secondary workers of a firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(c) of the Act must
be met.
(1) a significant number or proportion of the workers in the
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) the workers' firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a
firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of
eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or
production is related to the article or service that was the basis for
such certification; and
(3) either--
(A) the workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it
supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least
20 percent of the production or sales of the workers' firm; or
(B) a loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm described
in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers' separation or
threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade
Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply
for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility
requirements of Section 222(f) of the Act must be met.
(1) the workers' firm is publicly identified by name by the
International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an
investigation resulting in--
(A) an affirmative determination of serious injury or threat
thereof under section 202(b)(1);
(B) an affirmative determination of market disruption or threat
thereof under section 421(b)(1); or
(C) an affirmative final determination of material injury or threat
thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A));
(2) the petition is filed during the 1-year period beginning on the
date on which--
(A) a summary of the report submitted to the President by the
International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to
the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is
published in the Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); or
(B) notice of an affirmative determination described in
subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal Register; and
(3) the workers have become totally or partially separated from the
workers' firm within--
(A) the 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or
(B) notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year period preceding
the 1-year period described in paragraph (2).

Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance

The following certifications have been issued. The date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact date for all workers of such determination.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been
met.

The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services) of the Trade Act
have been met.

[[Page 32466]]

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
82,346..................... Whirlpool Corporation, Fort Smith, AR....... October 7, 2012.
Aerotek/Tek Systems
(Subcontractor of IBM
Corporation).
82,455..................... First Advantage St. Petersburg, FL... February 11, 2012.
Corporation, Tapfin,
Staffworks, Aerotek
Professional Services,
Randstad, etc.
82,560..................... Velux America, Inc., TVC Greenwood, SC........ March 13, 2012.
Holdings, Inc..
82,571..................... LexisNexis/Matthew Bender, Albany, NY........... March 18, 2012.
A Reed Elsevier, Not
Including Customer
Service and Fulfillment
Depts.
82,593..................... Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc., Newark, CA........... March 14, 2012.
Taiyo Nippon Sanso,
Electronics Division,
Aerotek, Apple One, etc.
82,610..................... Cooper Bussmann LLC, Ellisville, MO....... March 20, 2012.
Cooper Industries, Inc.,
Accounts Receivable and
Credit Group.
82,631..................... Humana Insurance Company, De Pere, WI.......... April 4, 2012.
Carenetwork, Inc., ASO
Finance Group.
82,658..................... SunTrust Bank, Enterprise Richmond, VA......... April 12, 2012.
Information Services, MDI
Group, Teksystems,
Insight Global.
82,665..................... William Arthur, Inc., West Kennebunk, ME... April 17, 2012.
Manpower.
82,682..................... Aclara Technologies LLC, Solon, OH............ April 22, 2012.
Esco Technologies,
Integrity Staffing,
Manpower, etc.
82,692..................... ADP Workscape, Inc., ADP Meridian, ID......... April 24, 2012.
Inc., Aerotek.
82,693..................... Dresser Masoneilan Avon, MA............. November 20, 2012.
Massachusetts Operation,
An Effiliate of General
Electric.
82,699..................... Medline Industries, Inc... Clearwater, FL....... October 23, 2012.
82,701..................... Pfizer, Inc., Surveillance Groton, CT........... May 1, 2012.
Testing Group Pfizer
Global Supply, Makro
Technologies, etc.
82,702..................... Electrolux Home Care Webster City, IA..... February 16, 2013.
Products, Inc.,
Electrolux Major
Appliances, Electrolux
North America, Inc.
82,702A.................... Leased Workers From Webster City, IA..... April 29, 2012.
Cornerstone, Electrolux
Home Care Products, Inc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible
to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met.

Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance

In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the
eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met
for the reasons specified.
The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs
(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or
services to a foreign country) of section 222 have not been met.

Determinations Terminating Investigations of Petitions for Worker
Adjustment Assistance

After notice of the petitions was published in the Federal Register
and on the Department's Web site, as required by Section 221 of the Act
(19 USC 2271), the Department initiated investigations of these
petitions.
The following determinations terminating investigations were issued
because the petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn.

[[Page 32467]]

The following determinations terminating investigations were issued
in cases where these petitions were not filed in accordance with the
requirements of 29 CFR 90.11. Every petition filed by workers must be
signed by at least three individuals of the petitioning worker group.
Petitioners separated more than one year prior to the date of the
petition cannot be covered under a certification of a petition under
Section 223(b), and therefore, may not be part of a petitioning worker
group. For one or more of these reasons, these petitions were deemed
invalid.

The following determinations terminating investigations were issued
because the petitions are the subject of ongoing investigations under
petitions filed earlier covering the same petitioners.

I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued
during the period of May 6, 2013 through May 10, 2013. These
determinations are available on the Department's Web site tradeact/taa/
taa--search--form.cfm under the searchable listing of determinations or
by calling the Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance toll free at 888-
365-6822.

Dated: May 16, 2013.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2013-12733 Filed 5-29-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.