Certain Cases for Portable Electronic Devices; Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting in Part Complainant's Motion for Leave To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation, 32442-32443 [2013-12718]

Download as PDF 32442 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 104 / Thursday, May 30, 2013 / Notices NEW HAMPSHIRE TENNESSEE Grafton County Davidson County American Baptist Theological Seminary Historic District, 1800 Baptist World Center Dr., Nashville, 13000399 Rockywold—Deephaven Camps (Squam MPS), Pinehurst Rd., Holderness, 13000382 Hillsborough County Hillsborough Mills, 37 Wilton Rd., Milford, 13000383 Merrimack County Shelby County Rosemark Historic District, 8501–8760 Kerrville-Rosemark Rd.; 8519–8727, 8736 Rosemark Rd., Rosemark, 13000400 Bradford Center Meetinghouse, 18 Rowe Mountain Rd., Bradford, 13000384 Sumner County Hawthorne Hill, 195 Old TN 25E., Castalian Springs, 13000401 NEW JERSEY VIRGINIA Cape May County Ocean City, N.J. Life-Saving Station, 801 4th St., Ocean City, 13000385 Bath County Garth Newel, 447 Garth Newel Ln., Hot Springs, 13000402 Union County WISCONSIN Scotch Plains Baptist Church, Parsonage and Cemetery, 333–334 Park Ave., Scotch Plains, 13000386 Jefferson County Richards Hill Residential Historic District, Roughly bounded by Western, Richards, Thomas & Harvey Aves.; Livsey Pl. & Charles St., Watertown, 13000403 OHIO Cuyahoga County [FR Doc. 2013–12767 Filed 5–29–13; 8:45 am] Chagrin Falls East Side Historic District, E. Washington & Philomethian Sts., Chagrin Falls, 13000387 Fairview Community Park Historic District, 21077 N. Park Dr., Fairview Park, 13000388 Mayfield Theatre Building, The, 12300 Mayfield Rd., Cleveland, 13000389 Templin—Bradley Company, 5700 Detroit Ave., Cleveland, 13000390 BILLING CODE 4312–51–P OKLAHOMA Canadian County Pittsburg County International Temple, Supreme Assembly, Order of the Rainbow for Girls, 315 E. Carl Albert Pkwy., McAlester, 13000393 Texas County Danholt, 1208 N. May, Guymon, 13000394 Woods County Hotel Bell, 505 Barnes, Alva, 13000395 OREGON TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Marion County Moser, Joseph Henry, Barn, 507 S. 3rd St., Silverton, 13000396 Soderberg, Peter and Bertha, House, (Silverton, Oregon, and Its Environs MPS), 1106 Pine St., Silverton, 13000397 VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:05 May 29, 2013 Jkt 229001 Record of Decision for the General Management Plan, Blue Ridge Parkway, Virginia and North Carolina National Park Service, Interior. Notice of availability. Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C), the National Park Service (NPS) announces the availability of the Record of Decision (ROD) for the General Management Plan (GMP) for Blue Ridge Parkway (parkway). On April 13, 2013, the Regional Director, Southeast Region, approved the ROD for the project. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Superintendent Phil Francis, Blue Ridge Parkway, 199 Hemphill Knob Road, Asheville, NC 28803; telephone (828) 271–4779. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NPS evaluated three alternatives for managing use and development of the parkway in the GMP/FEIS, Alternative A—no action Alternative, and two action Alternatives. The preferred alternative (Alternative B) from the FEIS/GMP is the alternative selected for implementation. Alternative B emphasizes the original parkway design and traditional driving experience, while enhancing outdoor recreation SUMMARY: Mager Mortgage Company Building, 231 NW. 10th St., Oklahoma City, 13000392 Owen Building, 1321 Lady St., Columbia, 13000398 [NPS–SERO–BLRI–12544; PPSESEROC3; PPMPSAS1Y.YP0000] ACTION: Oklahoma County Richland County National Park Service AGENCY: McGranahan Portion of the Chisholm Trail Roadbed, Address Restricted, Yukon, 13000391 SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR PO 00000 Frm 00078 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 opportunities and regional natural resource connectivity, and providing modest improvements to visitor services. To support that experience, many of the parkway’s recreation areas will provide enhanced opportunities for dispersed outdoor recreation activities. This action will proactively blend newer law and policy requirements and operational constraints with the traditional parkway concept developed from 1935 to 1955. As a result, the selected action will provide a better balance between traditional parkway experiences and modern-day management realities. Under Alternative C, parkway management would be more integrated with the region’s resources and economy, while enhancing parkway visitor services. The selected action will provide a comprehensive parkway-wide approach to resource and visitor use management. Specific management zones detailing acceptable resource conditions, visitor experience, use levels, appropriate activities and development will be applied to parkway lands (parkway segments and recreation areas) consistent with this concept. The selected action will also seek to enhance resource protection, regional natural resource connectivity, and build stronger connections with adjacent communities. The GMP will guide the management of the parkway over the next 20+ years. The responsible official for this FEIS/ GMP is the Regional Director, NPS Southeast Region, 100 Alabama Street SW., 1924 Building, Atlanta, Georgia 30303. Dated: May 14, 2013. Gordon Wissinger, Acting Regional Director, Southeast Region. [FR Doc. 2013–12759 Filed 5–29–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–JD–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 337–TA–867/861] Certain Cases for Portable Electronic Devices; Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting in Part Complainant’s Motion for Leave To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative law SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\30MYN1.SGM 30MYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 104 / Thursday, May 30, 2013 / Notices judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 9) granting in part complainant’s motion for leave to amend the complaint and notice of investigation as to removing respondent Jie Sheng Technology of Tainan City, Taiwan (‘‘Jie Sheng Taiwan’’) from the investigation. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Panyin A. Hughes, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–3042. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. The Commission instituted Inv. No. 337– TA–861 on November 16, 2012, based on a complaint filed by Speculative Product Design, LLC of Mountain View, California (‘‘Speck’’). 77 FR 68828 (Nov. 16, 2012). The complaint alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain cases for portable electronic devices by reason of infringement of various claims of United States Patent No. 8,204,561 (‘‘the ’561 patent’’). The complaint named several respondents. The Commission instituted Inv. No. 337–TA–867 on January 31, 2013, based on a complaint filed by Speck. 78 FR 6834 (Jan. 31, 2013). That complaint also alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain cases for portable electronic devices by reason of infringement of various claims of the ’561 patent. The complaint named several respondents. On January 31, 2013, the Commission consolidated the two investigations. Id. TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:25 May 29, 2013 Jkt 229001 On April 4, 2013, Speck moved for leave to amend the complaint and notice of investigation to remove respondent Jie Sheng Taiwan from the investigation and add as respondent Jie Sheng Technology of Shenzhen City, China. On April 15, 2013, the Commission investigative attorney filed a response in support of the motion. No other responses to the motion were filed. On April 30, 2013, the ALJ issued the subject ID, granting the motion in part as to removing respondent Jie Sheng Taiwan from the investigation. The ALJ found that, pursuant to Commission Rule 210.14(b) (19 CFR 210.14(b)), good cause exists to amend the complaint and notice of investigation. None of the parties petitioned for review of the ID. The Commission has determined not to review the ID. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in section 210.42 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42). By order of the Commission. Issued: May 23, 2013. William R. Bishop, Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer. [FR Doc. 2013–12718 Filed 5–29–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P Antitrust Division United States, et al. v. Cinemark Holdings, Inc., et al.; Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement Notice is hereby given pursuant to the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C. 16(b)–(h), that a proposed Final Judgment, Hold Separate Stipulation and Order and Competitive Impact Statement have been filed with the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in United States of America et al. v. Cinemark Holdings, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 1:13–cv– 727. On May 20, 2013, the United States filed a Complaint alleging that the proposed acquisition by Cinemark Holdings, Inc. of movie theatres and related assets from Rave Cinemas, LLC would violate Section 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. 18. The proposed Final Judgment, filed the same time as the Complaint, requires Cinemark Holdings, Inc. to divest certain theatre assets and requires Alder Wood Partners, L.P., Frm 00079 Fmt 4703 which is controlled by Cinemark’s Chairman, to divest Movie Tavern, Inc. Copies of the Complaint, proposed Final Judgment, Hold Separate Stipulation and Order and Competitive Impact Statement are available for inspection at the Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, Antitrust Documents Group, 450 Fifth Street NW., Suite 1010, Washington, DC 20530 (telephone: 202– 514–2481), on the Department of Justice’s Web site at http:// www.justice.gov/atr, and at the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Copies of these materials may be obtained from the Antitrust Division upon request and payment of the copying fee set by Department of Justice regulations. Public comment is invited within 60 days of the date of this notice. Such comments and responses thereto will be filed with the Court and posted on the U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division’s Web site, and, under certain circumstances published in the Federal Register. Comments should be directed to John R. Read, Chief, Litigation III Section, Antitrust Division, Department of Justice, 450 Fifth Street NW., Suite 4000, Washington, DC 20530 (telephone: 202–307–0468). Patricia A. Brink, Director of Civil Enforcement. United States District Court for the District of Columbia DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE PO 00000 32443 Sfmt 4703 United States of America, Antitrust Division, 450 Fifth Street NW., Suite 4000, Washington, DC 20530, and State of Texas, Office of the Attorney General, State of Texas, 300 W. 15th Street, 7th Floor, Austin, TX 78701, Plaintiffs, v. Cinemark Holdings, Inc., 3900 Dallas Parkway, Suite 500, Plano, TX 75093, Rave Holdings, LLC, 2101 Cedar Springs Road, Suite 800, Dallas, TX 75201, and Alder Wood Partners, L.P., 12400 Coit Road, Suite 800, Dallas, TX 75251, Defendants. Civil Action No.: 1:13–cv–00727. Judge: Beryl A. Howell. Filed: 05/20/2013. Complaint The United States of America, acting under the direction of the Attorney General of the United States, and the State of Texas, acting through its Attorney General, bring this civil antitrust action to prevent the proposed acquisition by Cinemark Holdings, Inc. (‘‘Cinemark’’) of thirty-two movie theatres owned and operated by Rave Holdings, LLC (‘‘Rave Cinemas’’). Cinemark is a significant competitor to Rave Cinemas in the exhibition of first-run, commercial movies in the area in and around Voorhees and Somerdale E:\FR\FM\30MYN1.SGM 30MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 104 (Thursday, May 30, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32442-32443]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-12718]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 337-TA-867/861]


Certain Cases for Portable Electronic Devices; Determination Not 
To Review an Initial Determination Granting in Part Complainant's 
Motion for Leave To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative 
law

[[Page 32443]]

judge's (``ALJ'') initial determination (``ID'') (Order No. 9) granting 
in part complainant's motion for leave to amend the complaint and 
notice of investigation as to removing respondent Jie Sheng Technology 
of Tainan City, Taiwan (``Jie Sheng Taiwan'') from the investigation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Panyin A. Hughes, Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3042. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission 
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov.
    Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this 
matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 
(202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted Inv. No. 337-TA-
861 on November 16, 2012, based on a complaint filed by Speculative 
Product Design, LLC of Mountain View, California (``Speck''). 77 FR 
68828 (Nov. 16, 2012). The complaint alleged violations of section 337 
of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into the 
United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United 
States after importation of certain cases for portable electronic 
devices by reason of infringement of various claims of United States 
Patent No. 8,204,561 (``the '561 patent''). The complaint named several 
respondents.
    The Commission instituted Inv. No. 337-TA-867 on January 31, 2013, 
based on a complaint filed by Speck. 78 FR 6834 (Jan. 31, 2013). That 
complaint also alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into the United States, the 
sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after 
importation of certain cases for portable electronic devices by reason 
of infringement of various claims of the '561 patent. The complaint 
named several respondents. On January 31, 2013, the Commission 
consolidated the two investigations. Id.
    On April 4, 2013, Speck moved for leave to amend the complaint and 
notice of investigation to remove respondent Jie Sheng Taiwan from the 
investigation and add as respondent Jie Sheng Technology of Shenzhen 
City, China. On April 15, 2013, the Commission investigative attorney 
filed a response in support of the motion. No other responses to the 
motion were filed.
    On April 30, 2013, the ALJ issued the subject ID, granting the 
motion in part as to removing respondent Jie Sheng Taiwan from the 
investigation. The ALJ found that, pursuant to Commission Rule 
210.14(b) (19 CFR 210.14(b)), good cause exists to amend the complaint 
and notice of investigation. None of the parties petitioned for review 
of the ID.
    The Commission has determined not to review the ID.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in section 210.42 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure 
(19 CFR 210.42).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: May 23, 2013.
William R. Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013-12718 Filed 5-29-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P