Certain Cases for Portable Electronic Devices; Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting in Part Complainant's Motion for Leave To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation, 32442-32443 [2013-12718]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
32442
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 104 / Thursday, May 30, 2013 / Notices
NEW HAMPSHIRE
TENNESSEE
Grafton County
Davidson County
American Baptist Theological Seminary
Historic District, 1800 Baptist World
Center Dr., Nashville, 13000399
Rockywold—Deephaven Camps (Squam
MPS), Pinehurst Rd., Holderness,
13000382
Hillsborough County
Hillsborough Mills, 37 Wilton Rd., Milford,
13000383
Merrimack County
Shelby County
Rosemark Historic District, 8501–8760
Kerrville-Rosemark Rd.; 8519–8727, 8736
Rosemark Rd., Rosemark, 13000400
Bradford Center Meetinghouse, 18 Rowe
Mountain Rd., Bradford, 13000384
Sumner County
Hawthorne Hill, 195 Old TN 25E., Castalian
Springs, 13000401
NEW JERSEY
VIRGINIA
Cape May County
Ocean City, N.J. Life-Saving Station, 801 4th
St., Ocean City, 13000385
Bath County
Garth Newel, 447 Garth Newel Ln., Hot
Springs, 13000402
Union County
WISCONSIN
Scotch Plains Baptist Church, Parsonage and
Cemetery, 333–334 Park Ave., Scotch
Plains, 13000386
Jefferson County
Richards Hill Residential Historic District,
Roughly bounded by Western, Richards,
Thomas & Harvey Aves.; Livsey Pl. &
Charles St., Watertown, 13000403
OHIO
Cuyahoga County
[FR Doc. 2013–12767 Filed 5–29–13; 8:45 am]
Chagrin Falls East Side Historic District, E.
Washington & Philomethian Sts., Chagrin
Falls, 13000387
Fairview Community Park Historic District,
21077 N. Park Dr., Fairview Park,
13000388
Mayfield Theatre Building, The, 12300
Mayfield Rd., Cleveland, 13000389
Templin—Bradley Company, 5700 Detroit
Ave., Cleveland, 13000390
BILLING CODE 4312–51–P
OKLAHOMA
Canadian County
Pittsburg County
International Temple, Supreme Assembly,
Order of the Rainbow for Girls, 315 E. Carl
Albert Pkwy., McAlester, 13000393
Texas County
Danholt, 1208 N. May, Guymon, 13000394
Woods County
Hotel Bell, 505 Barnes, Alva, 13000395
OREGON
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Marion County
Moser, Joseph Henry, Barn, 507 S. 3rd St.,
Silverton, 13000396
Soderberg, Peter and Bertha, House,
(Silverton, Oregon, and Its Environs MPS),
1106 Pine St., Silverton, 13000397
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:05 May 29, 2013
Jkt 229001
Record of Decision for the General
Management Plan, Blue Ridge
Parkway, Virginia and North Carolina
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice of availability.
Pursuant to the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42
U.S.C. 4332(2)(C), the National Park
Service (NPS) announces the
availability of the Record of Decision
(ROD) for the General Management Plan
(GMP) for Blue Ridge Parkway
(parkway). On April 13, 2013, the
Regional Director, Southeast Region,
approved the ROD for the project.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Superintendent Phil Francis, Blue Ridge
Parkway, 199 Hemphill Knob Road,
Asheville, NC 28803; telephone (828)
271–4779.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NPS
evaluated three alternatives for
managing use and development of the
parkway in the GMP/FEIS, Alternative
A—no action Alternative, and two
action Alternatives. The preferred
alternative (Alternative B) from the
FEIS/GMP is the alternative selected for
implementation. Alternative B
emphasizes the original parkway design
and traditional driving experience,
while enhancing outdoor recreation
SUMMARY:
Mager Mortgage Company Building, 231 NW.
10th St., Oklahoma City, 13000392
Owen Building, 1321 Lady St., Columbia,
13000398
[NPS–SERO–BLRI–12544; PPSESEROC3;
PPMPSAS1Y.YP0000]
ACTION:
Oklahoma County
Richland County
National Park Service
AGENCY:
McGranahan Portion of the Chisholm Trail
Roadbed, Address Restricted, Yukon,
13000391
SOUTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
opportunities and regional natural
resource connectivity, and providing
modest improvements to visitor
services. To support that experience,
many of the parkway’s recreation areas
will provide enhanced opportunities for
dispersed outdoor recreation activities.
This action will proactively blend
newer law and policy requirements and
operational constraints with the
traditional parkway concept developed
from 1935 to 1955. As a result, the
selected action will provide a better
balance between traditional parkway
experiences and modern-day
management realities. Under Alternative
C, parkway management would be more
integrated with the region’s resources
and economy, while enhancing parkway
visitor services.
The selected action will provide a
comprehensive parkway-wide approach
to resource and visitor use management.
Specific management zones detailing
acceptable resource conditions, visitor
experience, use levels, appropriate
activities and development will be
applied to parkway lands (parkway
segments and recreation areas)
consistent with this concept. The
selected action will also seek to enhance
resource protection, regional natural
resource connectivity, and build
stronger connections with adjacent
communities. The GMP will guide the
management of the parkway over the
next 20+ years.
The responsible official for this FEIS/
GMP is the Regional Director, NPS
Southeast Region, 100 Alabama Street
SW., 1924 Building, Atlanta, Georgia
30303.
Dated: May 14, 2013.
Gordon Wissinger,
Acting Regional Director, Southeast Region.
[FR Doc. 2013–12759 Filed 5–29–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–JD–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 337–TA–867/861]
Certain Cases for Portable Electronic
Devices; Determination Not To Review
an Initial Determination Granting in
Part Complainant’s Motion for Leave
To Amend the Complaint and Notice of
Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review the presiding administrative law
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\30MYN1.SGM
30MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 104 / Thursday, May 30, 2013 / Notices
judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination
(‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 9) granting in part
complainant’s motion for leave to
amend the complaint and notice of
investigation as to removing respondent
Jie Sheng Technology of Tainan City,
Taiwan (‘‘Jie Sheng Taiwan’’) from the
investigation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Panyin A. Hughes, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–3042. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised
that information on this matter can be
obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal on (202)
205–1810.
The
Commission instituted Inv. No. 337–
TA–861 on November 16, 2012, based
on a complaint filed by Speculative
Product Design, LLC of Mountain View,
California (‘‘Speck’’). 77 FR 68828 (Nov.
16, 2012). The complaint alleged
violations of section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain cases for portable electronic
devices by reason of infringement of
various claims of United States Patent
No. 8,204,561 (‘‘the ’561 patent’’). The
complaint named several respondents.
The Commission instituted Inv. No.
337–TA–867 on January 31, 2013, based
on a complaint filed by Speck. 78 FR
6834 (Jan. 31, 2013). That complaint
also alleged violations of section 337 of
the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337)
in the importation into the United
States, the sale for importation, and the
sale within the United States after
importation of certain cases for portable
electronic devices by reason of
infringement of various claims of the
’561 patent. The complaint named
several respondents. On January 31,
2013, the Commission consolidated the
two investigations. Id.
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:25 May 29, 2013
Jkt 229001
On April 4, 2013, Speck moved for
leave to amend the complaint and
notice of investigation to remove
respondent Jie Sheng Taiwan from the
investigation and add as respondent Jie
Sheng Technology of Shenzhen City,
China. On April 15, 2013, the
Commission investigative attorney filed
a response in support of the motion. No
other responses to the motion were
filed.
On April 30, 2013, the ALJ issued the
subject ID, granting the motion in part
as to removing respondent Jie Sheng
Taiwan from the investigation. The ALJ
found that, pursuant to Commission
Rule 210.14(b) (19 CFR 210.14(b)), good
cause exists to amend the complaint and
notice of investigation. None of the
parties petitioned for review of the ID.
The Commission has determined not
to review the ID.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in
section 210.42 of the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
210.42).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: May 23, 2013.
William R. Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information
Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013–12718 Filed 5–29–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
Antitrust Division
United States, et al. v. Cinemark
Holdings, Inc., et al.; Proposed Final
Judgment and Competitive Impact
Statement
Notice is hereby given pursuant to the
Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act,
15 U.S.C. 16(b)–(h), that a proposed
Final Judgment, Hold Separate
Stipulation and Order and Competitive
Impact Statement have been filed with
the United States District Court for the
District of Columbia in United States of
America et al. v. Cinemark Holdings,
Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 1:13–cv–
727. On May 20, 2013, the United States
filed a Complaint alleging that the
proposed acquisition by Cinemark
Holdings, Inc. of movie theatres and
related assets from Rave Cinemas, LLC
would violate Section 7 of the Clayton
Act, 15 U.S.C. 18. The proposed Final
Judgment, filed the same time as the
Complaint, requires Cinemark Holdings,
Inc. to divest certain theatre assets and
requires Alder Wood Partners, L.P.,
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
which is controlled by Cinemark’s
Chairman, to divest Movie Tavern, Inc.
Copies of the Complaint, proposed
Final Judgment, Hold Separate
Stipulation and Order and Competitive
Impact Statement are available for
inspection at the Department of Justice,
Antitrust Division, Antitrust Documents
Group, 450 Fifth Street NW., Suite 1010,
Washington, DC 20530 (telephone: 202–
514–2481), on the Department of
Justice’s Web site at https://
www.justice.gov/atr, and at the Office of
the Clerk of the United States District
Court for the District of Columbia.
Copies of these materials may be
obtained from the Antitrust Division
upon request and payment of the
copying fee set by Department of Justice
regulations.
Public comment is invited within 60
days of the date of this notice. Such
comments and responses thereto will be
filed with the Court and posted on the
U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust
Division’s Web site, and, under certain
circumstances published in the Federal
Register. Comments should be directed
to John R. Read, Chief, Litigation III
Section, Antitrust Division, Department
of Justice, 450 Fifth Street NW., Suite
4000, Washington, DC 20530
(telephone: 202–307–0468).
Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement.
United States District Court for the
District of Columbia
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
PO 00000
32443
Sfmt 4703
United States of America, Antitrust
Division, 450 Fifth Street NW., Suite 4000,
Washington, DC 20530, and State of Texas,
Office of the Attorney General, State of
Texas, 300 W. 15th Street, 7th Floor, Austin,
TX 78701, Plaintiffs, v. Cinemark Holdings,
Inc., 3900 Dallas Parkway, Suite 500, Plano,
TX 75093, Rave Holdings, LLC, 2101 Cedar
Springs Road, Suite 800, Dallas, TX 75201,
and Alder Wood Partners, L.P., 12400 Coit
Road, Suite 800, Dallas, TX 75251,
Defendants.
Civil Action No.: 1:13–cv–00727.
Judge: Beryl A. Howell.
Filed: 05/20/2013.
Complaint
The United States of America, acting
under the direction of the Attorney
General of the United States, and the
State of Texas, acting through its
Attorney General, bring this civil
antitrust action to prevent the proposed
acquisition by Cinemark Holdings, Inc.
(‘‘Cinemark’’) of thirty-two movie
theatres owned and operated by Rave
Holdings, LLC (‘‘Rave Cinemas’’).
Cinemark is a significant competitor
to Rave Cinemas in the exhibition of
first-run, commercial movies in the area
in and around Voorhees and Somerdale
E:\FR\FM\30MYN1.SGM
30MYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 104 (Thursday, May 30, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32442-32443]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-12718]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 337-TA-867/861]
Certain Cases for Portable Electronic Devices; Determination Not
To Review an Initial Determination Granting in Part Complainant's
Motion for Leave To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative
law
[[Page 32443]]
judge's (``ALJ'') initial determination (``ID'') (Order No. 9) granting
in part complainant's motion for leave to amend the complaint and
notice of investigation as to removing respondent Jie Sheng Technology
of Tainan City, Taiwan (``Jie Sheng Taiwan'') from the investigation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Panyin A. Hughes, Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3042. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are
or will be available for inspection during official business hours
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this
matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on
(202) 205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted Inv. No. 337-TA-
861 on November 16, 2012, based on a complaint filed by Speculative
Product Design, LLC of Mountain View, California (``Speck''). 77 FR
68828 (Nov. 16, 2012). The complaint alleged violations of section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United
States after importation of certain cases for portable electronic
devices by reason of infringement of various claims of United States
Patent No. 8,204,561 (``the '561 patent''). The complaint named several
respondents.
The Commission instituted Inv. No. 337-TA-867 on January 31, 2013,
based on a complaint filed by Speck. 78 FR 6834 (Jan. 31, 2013). That
complaint also alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after
importation of certain cases for portable electronic devices by reason
of infringement of various claims of the '561 patent. The complaint
named several respondents. On January 31, 2013, the Commission
consolidated the two investigations. Id.
On April 4, 2013, Speck moved for leave to amend the complaint and
notice of investigation to remove respondent Jie Sheng Taiwan from the
investigation and add as respondent Jie Sheng Technology of Shenzhen
City, China. On April 15, 2013, the Commission investigative attorney
filed a response in support of the motion. No other responses to the
motion were filed.
On April 30, 2013, the ALJ issued the subject ID, granting the
motion in part as to removing respondent Jie Sheng Taiwan from the
investigation. The ALJ found that, pursuant to Commission Rule
210.14(b) (19 CFR 210.14(b)), good cause exists to amend the complaint
and notice of investigation. None of the parties petitioned for review
of the ID.
The Commission has determined not to review the ID.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in section 210.42 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure
(19 CFR 210.42).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: May 23, 2013.
William R. Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013-12718 Filed 5-29-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
