Enforcement Proceeding; Certain Two-Way Global Satellite Communication Devices, System and Components Thereof; Notice of Institution of Formal Enforcement Proceeding, 31576-31577 [2013-12373]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
31576
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 101 / Friday, May 24, 2013 / Notices
questions regarding filing should
contact the Secretary (202–205–2000).
Any person desiring to submit a
document to the Commission in
confidence must request confidential
treatment. All such requests should be
directed to the Secretary to the
Commission and must include a full
statement of the reasons why the
Commission should grant such
treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents
for which confidential treatment by the
Commission is properly sought will be
treated accordingly. All nonconfidential
written submissions will be available for
public inspection at the Office of the
Secretary and on EDIS.5
This action is taken under the
authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337),
and of sections 201.10 and 210.8(c) of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (19 CFR 201.10, 210.8(c)).
Issued: May 20, 2013.
By order of the Commission.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2013–12372 Filed 5–23–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–1110 (Review)]
Sodium Hexametaphosphate From
China; Scheduling of an Expedited
Five-Year Review
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Commission hereby gives
notice of the scheduling of an expedited
review pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of
the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
1675(c)(3)) (the Act) to determine
whether revocation of the antidumping
duty order on sodium
hexametaphosphate from China would
be likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of material injury within a
reasonably foreseeable time. For further
information concerning the conduct of
this review and rules of general
application, consult the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure, part
201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part
201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and
F (19 CFR part 207).
DATES: Effective Date: May 7, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
5 Electronic Document Information System
(EDIS): https://edis.usitc.gov.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
21:14 May 23, 2013
Jkt 229001
Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this review may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.—On May 7, 2013, the
Commission determined that the
domestic interested party group
response to its notice of institution (78
FR 7452, February 1, 2013) of the
subject five-year review was adequate
and that the respondent interested party
group response was inadequate. The
Commission did not find any
circumstances that would warrant
conducting a full review.1 Accordingly,
the Commission determined that it
would conduct an expedited review
pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Act.
Staff report.—A staff report
containing information concerning the
subject matter of the review will be
placed in the nonpublic record on May
31, 2013, and made available to persons
on the Administrative Protective Order
service list for this review. A public
version will be issued thereafter,
pursuant to section 207.62(d)(4) of the
Commission’s rules.
Written submissions.—As provided in
section 207.62(d) of the Commission’s
rules, interested parties that are parties
to the review and that have provided
individually adequate responses to the
notice of institution,2 and any party
other than an interested party to the
review may file written comments with
the Secretary on what determination the
Commission should reach in the review.
Comments are due on or before June 5,
2013 and may not contain new factual
information. Any person that is neither
a party to the five-year review nor an
interested party may submit a brief
written statement (which shall not
contain any new factual information)
1 A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the
Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any
individual Commissioner’s statements will be
available from the Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission’s Web site.
2 The Commission has found the joint response
submitted by ICL Performance Products LP and
Innophos, Inc. to be individually adequate.
Comments from other interested parties will not be
accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)).
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
pertinent to the review by June 5, 2013.
However, should the Department of
Commerce extend the time limit for its
completion of the final results of its
review, the deadline for comments
(which may not contain new factual
information) on Commerce’s final
results is three business days after the
issuance of Commerce’s results. If
comments contain business proprietary
information (BPI), they must conform
with the requirements of sections 201.6,
207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s
rules. Please be aware that the
Commission’s rules with respect to
electronic filing have been amended.
The amendments took effect on
November 7, 2011. See 76 Fed. Reg.
61937 (Oct. 6, 2011) and the newly
revised Commission’s Handbook on
E-Filing, available on the Commission’s
Web site at https://edis.usitc.gov.
In accordance with sections 201.16(c)
and 207.3 of the rules, each document
filed by a party to the review must be
served on all other parties to the review
(as identified by either the public or BPI
service list), and a certificate of service
must be timely filed. The Secretary will
not accept a document for filing without
a certificate of service.
Authority: This review is being conducted
under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act
of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to
section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: May 20, 2013.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2013–12342 Filed 5–23–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–854]
Enforcement Proceeding; Certain TwoWay Global Satellite Communication
Devices, System and Components
Thereof; Notice of Institution of Formal
Enforcement Proceeding
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has instituted a formal
enforcement proceeding relating to the
April 5, 2013, consent order issued in
the above-captioned investigation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Clint Gerdine, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\24MYN1.SGM
24MYN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 101 / Friday, May 24, 2013 / Notices
708–2310. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted the original
investigation on September 21, 2012,
based on a complaint filed on behalf of
BriarTek IP, Inc. (‘‘BriarTek’’) of
Alexandria, Virginia. 77 FR 58579–80.
The complaint alleged violations of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain two-way global satellite
communication devices, system and
components thereof by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent No. 7,991,380 (‘‘the ’380 patent’’).
The complaint further alleged the
existence of a domestic industry. The
Commission’s notice of investigation
named as respondents Yellowbrick
Tracking, Ltd. (‘‘Yellowbrick’’) of Essex,
United Kingdom; DeLorme Publishing
Company, Inc.; and DeLorme InReach
LLC (collectively, ‘‘DeLorme’’), both of
Yarmouth, Maine. On December 7,
2012, Yellowbrick was terminated from
the investigation based on a settlement
agreement.
On April 5, 2013, the Commission
issued notice of its determination not to
review the presiding administrative law
judge’s initial determination granting
DeLorme’s motion to terminate the
investigation based on a consent order
stipulation and issued a consent order.
The consent order prohibits the
importing or selling for importation in
the United States, or selling or offering
for sale within the United States after
importation any two-way global satellite
communication devices, system, and
components thereof that infringe one or
more of claims 1, 2, 5, 10–12, and 34 of
the ’380 patent.
On April 10, 2013, BriarTek filed a
complaint for enforcement proceedings
under Commission Rule 210.75.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
21:14 May 23, 2013
Jkt 229001
BriarTek asserts that DeLorme has
violated the consent order by the
continued practice of prohibited
activities such as selling or offering for
sale within the United States after
importation two-way global satellite
communication devices, systems, or
components thereof that infringe one or
more of the asserted claims of the ’380
patent.
Having examined the complaint
seeking a formal enforcement
proceeding, and having found that the
complaint complies with the
requirements for institution of a formal
enforcement proceeding contained in
Commission rule 210.75, the
Commission has determined to institute
formal enforcement proceedings to
determine whether DeLorme is in
violation of the April 5, 2013 consent
order issued in the investigation, and
what, if any, enforcement measures are
appropriate. The following entities are
named as parties to the formal
enforcement proceeding: (1) BriarTek,
(2) respondent DeLorme, and (3) the
Office of Unfair Import Investigations.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in
section 210.75 of the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
210.75).
Issued: May 20, 2013.
By order of the Commission.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
31577
7210.90 and 7212.50 of the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States,
that are alleged to be sold in the United
States at less than fair value (LTFV).2
Commencement of Final Phase
Investigation
Pursuant to section 207.18 of the
Commission’s rules, the Commission
also gives notice of the commencement
of the final phase of its investigation.
The Commission will issue a final phase
notice of scheduling, which will be
published in the Federal Register as
provided in section 207.21 of the
Commission’s rules, upon notice from
the Department of Commerce
(Commerce) of an affirmative
preliminary determination in the
investigation under section 733(b) of the
Act, or, if the preliminary determination
is negative, upon notice of an
affirmative final determination in that
investigation under section 735(a) of the
Act. Parties that filed entries of
appearance in the preliminary phase of
the investigation need not enter a
separate appearance for the final phase
of the investigation. Industrial users,
and, if the merchandise under
investigation is sold at the retail level,
representative consumer organizations
have the right to appear as parties in
Commission antidumping and
countervailing duty investigations. The
Secretary will prepare a public service
list containing the names and addresses
of all persons, or their representatives,
who are parties to the investigation.
[FR Doc. 2013–12373 Filed 5–23–13; 8:45 am]
Background
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
On March 27, 2013, a petition was
filed with the Commission and
Commerce by Thomas Steel Strip
Corporation, Warren, Ohio, alleging that
an industry in the United States is
materially injured or threatened with
material injury by reason of LTFV
imports of diffusion-annealed, nickelplated flat-rolled steel products from
Japan. Accordingly, effective March 27,
2013, the Commission instituted
antidumping duty investigation No.
731–TA–1206 (Preliminary).
Notice of the institution of the
Commission’s investigation and of a
public conference to be held in
connection therewith was given by
posting copies of the notice in the Office
of the Secretary, U.S. International
Trade Commission, Washington, DC,
and by publishing the notice in the
Federal Register of April 2, 2013 (78 FR
19734). The conference was held in
Washington, DC, on April 17, 2013, and
all persons who requested the
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–1206
(Preliminary)]
Diffusion-Annealed, Nickel-Plated FlatRolled Steel Products From Japan
Determination
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject investigation, the United
States International Trade Commission
(Commission) determines, pursuant to
section 733(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930
(19 U.S.C. 1673b(a)) (the Act), that there
is a reasonable indication that an
industry in the United States is
materially injured by reason of imports
from Japan of diffusion-annealed,
nickel-plated flat-rolled steel products,
provided for primarily in subheadings
1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2 Commissioner
E:\FR\FM\24MYN1.SGM
24MYN1
Daniel R. Pearson dissenting.
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 101 (Friday, May 24, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31576-31577]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-12373]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-854]
Enforcement Proceeding; Certain Two-Way Global Satellite
Communication Devices, System and Components Thereof; Notice of
Institution of Formal Enforcement Proceeding
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has instituted a formal enforcement proceeding relating to
the April 5, 2013, consent order issued in the above-captioned
investigation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clint Gerdine, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
[[Page 31577]]
708-2310. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with
this investigation are or will be available for inspection during
official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information
concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this
investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket
(EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised
that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the
Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted the original
investigation on September 21, 2012, based on a complaint filed on
behalf of BriarTek IP, Inc. (``BriarTek'') of Alexandria, Virginia. 77
FR 58579-80. The complaint alleged violations of section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into
the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the
United States after importation of certain two-way global satellite
communication devices, system and components thereof by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,991,380 (``the '380
patent''). The complaint further alleged the existence of a domestic
industry. The Commission's notice of investigation named as respondents
Yellowbrick Tracking, Ltd. (``Yellowbrick'') of Essex, United Kingdom;
DeLorme Publishing Company, Inc.; and DeLorme InReach LLC
(collectively, ``DeLorme''), both of Yarmouth, Maine. On December 7,
2012, Yellowbrick was terminated from the investigation based on a
settlement agreement.
On April 5, 2013, the Commission issued notice of its determination
not to review the presiding administrative law judge's initial
determination granting DeLorme's motion to terminate the investigation
based on a consent order stipulation and issued a consent order. The
consent order prohibits the importing or selling for importation in the
United States, or selling or offering for sale within the United States
after importation any two-way global satellite communication devices,
system, and components thereof that infringe one or more of claims 1,
2, 5, 10-12, and 34 of the '380 patent.
On April 10, 2013, BriarTek filed a complaint for enforcement
proceedings under Commission Rule 210.75. BriarTek asserts that DeLorme
has violated the consent order by the continued practice of prohibited
activities such as selling or offering for sale within the United
States after importation two-way global satellite communication
devices, systems, or components thereof that infringe one or more of
the asserted claims of the '380 patent.
Having examined the complaint seeking a formal enforcement
proceeding, and having found that the complaint complies with the
requirements for institution of a formal enforcement proceeding
contained in Commission rule 210.75, the Commission has determined to
institute formal enforcement proceedings to determine whether DeLorme
is in violation of the April 5, 2013 consent order issued in the
investigation, and what, if any, enforcement measures are appropriate.
The following entities are named as parties to the formal enforcement
proceeding: (1) BriarTek, (2) respondent DeLorme, and (3) the Office of
Unfair Import Investigations.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in section 210.75 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure
(19 CFR 210.75).
Issued: May 20, 2013.
By order of the Commission.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2013-12373 Filed 5-23-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
