Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to FLEX Options, 29797-29801 [2013-12040]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 98 / Tuesday, May 21, 2013 / Notices
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing will also be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–BX–
2013–036 and should be submitted on
or before June 11, 2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.16
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III, below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
The purpose of the proposed rule
change is to amend Exchange Rule
1079(a) which concerns the
characteristics applicable to FLEX
options and 1079(b) and eliminate
OFPA F–28 which concerns the
procedures for quoting and trading
FLEX options.3 The Exchange is
proposing to amend its FLEX rules in
Rule 1079 to establish the same
procedures for quoting and trading
FLEX options as exist today on NYSE
MKT LLC (‘‘Amex’’).4
Today, a Requesting Member shall
obtain quotes and execute trades in
certain non-listed FLEX options at the
specialist post of the non-FLEX option
on the Exchange. The Requesting
Member is a Phlx member qualified to
trade FLEX options pursuant to
paragraph (c) of Rule 1079 who initiates
a FLEX Request For Quotes (‘‘RFQ’’)
pursuant to paragraph (b) of Rule 1079.
FLEX options are not continuously
quoted and series are not preestablished.5 Today a Requesting
Member may initiate an RFQ by first
announcing all of the following contract
terms to the trading crowd of the nonFLEX option and then submitting an
RFQ ticket to that specialist post: (1)
Underlying index, security or foreign
currency, (2) type, size and crossing
intention (3) in the case of FLEX index
options and FLEX equity options,
exercise style, (4) expiration date, (5)
exercise price, and, (6) respecting index
options, the settlement value.
Thereafter, on receipt of an RFQ in
proper form, the assigned specialist or
Requesting Member shall cause the
terms of the RFQ to be disseminated as
an administrative text message through
the Options Price Reporting Authority
(‘‘OPRA’’).
The Exchange proposes to adopt
rules, similar to Amex, which requires
a Requesting Member to submit to the
FLEX Specialist an RFQ utilizing for
that purpose the forms, formats and
procedures established by the Exchange.
Thereafter, on receipt of an RFQ in
proper form, the assigned FLEX
Specialist shall cause the terms and
specifications of the RFQ to be
immediately announced at the post.
Such communication shall be
disseminated as an administrative text
message through the Options Price
Reporting Authority (‘‘OPRA’’).6
Today, following the RFQ
announcement, a preset response time
will begin, during which members may
provide responsive quotes. The
response time, between two and 15
minutes, will be determined by the
Exchange. During the response time,
members may provide responsive
quotes to the RFQ, which may be
entered, modified or withdrawn during
such response time. Each assigned ROT
3 The term ‘‘FLEX option’’ means a FLEX option
contract that is traded subject to this Rule. Although
FLEX options are generally subject to the rules in
this section, to the extent that the provisions of this
Rule are inconsistent with other applicable
Exchange rules, this Rule takes precedence with
respect to FLEX options.
4 See Amex Rule 904G (FLEX Trading Procedures
and Principles).
5 The Exchange’s electronic quoting and trading
system is not available for FLEX options. The
variable terms of FLEX options shall be established
through the process described in Rule 1079. All
transactions must be in compliance with Section 11
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules
promulgated thereunder, which may include
yielding priority to customer orders.
6 See proposed Rule 1079(b)(1).
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of the Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
Exchange Rule 1079 entitled ‘‘FLEX,
Index, Equity and Currency Options’’
and Option Floor Procedure Advice
(‘‘OFPA’’) F–28 entitled ‘‘Trading FLEX
Index, Equity and Currency Options.’’
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s Web site
at https://www.nasdaqtrader.com/
micro.aspx?id=PHLXRulefilings, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
1. Purpose
[FR Doc. 2013–12035 Filed 5–20–13; 8:45 am]
[Release No. 34–69586; File No. SR–Phlx–
2013–50]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change Relating to
FLEX Options
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
May 15, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 2 thereunder,
notice is hereby given that on May 2,
2013, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC
(‘‘Phlx’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed
16 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:07 May 20, 2013
Jkt 229001
29797
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\21MYN1.SGM
21MYN1
29798
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 98 / Tuesday, May 21, 2013 / Notices
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
and assigned specialist 7 who responds
is required to respond with a market of
the minimum size, but is not required
to provide continuous quotes or a
minimum bid-offer differential
(quotation spread parameters).
The Exchange proposes to adopt
rules, similar to Amex, which provide
that Members may enter at the FLEX
post FLEX Quotes responsive to each
Request for Quotes. FLEX Quotes must
be entered during the Request Response
Time.8 Each FLEX Quote shall refer to
a reference indicator as the Exchange
determines appropriate from time to
time. All FLEX Quotes may be entered,
modified or withdrawn at any point
during the Request Response Time. At
the expiration of the Request Response
Time, the best bid or offer (‘‘BBO’’) shall
be identified in accordance with the
price and time priority principles set
forth by the Exchange.9
Today, with respect to the BBO, at the
end of the response time, the assigned
specialist, or if none, the Requesting
Member shall determine the BBO, based
on price, but not time or size. However,
where two or more bids/offers are at
parity, bids/offers submitted by an
assigned specialist, assigned ROT or
customer will have priority over bids/
offers submitted by non-assigned ROTs
and by controlled accounts as defined in
Rule 1014(g)(i). The BBO shall be
disseminated with reference to the
corresponding RFQ. Further, if the
Requesting Member rejects the BBO or
the BBO is for less than the entire size
requested, the BBO Improvement
Interval provides a two minute time
period during which the BBO may be
matched or improved. An assigned ROT
or assigned specialist who responded
with a market during the response time
may immediately join any new BBO.
The new BBO shall be determined, and
disseminated with reference to the
corresponding RFQ.
The Exchange proposes to amend this
portion of the rule to instead state,
7 Pursuant to Rule 1079(c), a ROT or specialist
may apply on a form prescribed by the Exchange
to be assigned in FLEX options. At least two
members shall be assigned to each FLEX option.
Only the specialist in the non-FLEX option may be
the assigned specialist in that FLEX option (‘‘FLEX
Specialist’’). The provisions of Rule 1014(c)
regarding market making obligations shall be
applicable to assigned ROTs and assigned
specialists, such that a market must be provided in
any FLEX option when requested by an Options
Exchange Official. The Exchange proposes to define
‘‘FLEX Specialist’’ within Rule 1079(c).
8 The Exchange proposes to notify its members of
the time period for the Request Response Time by
issuing a memorandum to the Exchange members
on the trading floor. The Exchange intends to
provide a reasonable notice period to members if it
determines to change the Request Response Time.
9 See proposed Rule 1079(b)(2).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:07 May 20, 2013
Jkt 229001
similar to Amex, that at the expiration
of the Request Response Time, the BBO
shall be displayed on such market data
systems as are available. If the
Requesting Member has not indicated
an intention to cross or act as principal
with respect to any part of the FLEX
trade, the member shall promptly accept
or reject the displayed BBO: Provided,
however, that if such a Requesting
Member either rejects the BBO or is
given a BBO for less than the entire size
requested, all FLEX participating
members other than the Requesting
Member will have an opportunity
during the BBO Improvement Interval in
which to match, or improve, (as
applicable), the BBO. At the expiration
of any such BBO Improvement Interval,
the Requesting Member must promptly
accept or reject the BBO(s). If the
Requesting Member has indicated an
intention to cross or act as principal
with respect to any part of the FLEX
trade, acceptance of the displayed BBO
shall be automatically delayed until the
expiration of the BBO Improvement
Interval. Prior to the BBO Improvement
Interval, the Requesting Member must
indicate at the post the price at which
the member expects to trade. In these
circumstances, the Requesting Member
may participate with all other FLEXparticipating members in attempting to
improve or match the BBO during the
BBO Improvement Interval. At
expiration of the BBO Improvement
Interval, the Requesting Member must
promptly accept or reject the BBO(s).
The Requesting Member has no
obligation to accept any FLEX bid or
offer. Whenever, following the
completion of FLEX bidding and
offering responsive to a given RFQs, the
Requesting Member rejects the BBO or
the BBO size exceeds the FLEX
transaction size indicated in the RFQs,
members may accept the entire order or
the unfilled balance of the BBO. The
highest bid shall have priority, but
where the two or more best bids are
submitted at the same price, the bid(s)
submitted first in time will have
priority. The lowest offer shall have
priority, but where the two or more best
offers are submitted at the same price,
the offer(s) submitted first in time will
have priority. In the case of FLEX equity
options only and notwithstanding Rule
1079(b)(4), whenever the Requesting
Member has indicated an intention to
cross or act as principal on the trade and
has matched or improved the BBO
during the BBO Improvement Interval,
the Requesting Member will be
permitted to execute the contra side of
the trade that is the subject of the RFQs,
to the extent of at least 40% of the trade,
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
provided the order is a public customer
order or an order respecting the
Requesting Member’s firm proprietary
account. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
all market participants may effect
crossing transactions.10
The Exchange would eliminate the
provisions that today describe trading,
such that a trade in FLEX options
cannot be executed until the end of the
response time or BBO Improvement
Interval. Today, once the response time
or Improvement Interval ends, the
Requesting Member is given the first
opportunity to trade on the market, by
voicing a bid/offer in the trading crowd.
The Requesting Member has no
obligation to accept any bid or offer for
a FLEX option. If the Requesting
Member rejects the BBO or the BBO size
exceeds the entire size requested,
another member may promptly accept
such BBO or the unfilled balance of the
BBO. Once the BBO is established and
no trade has occurred, the RFQ remains
open during that trading day, such that
a member may re-quote the market with
respect to the open RFQ, as opposed to
submitting an additional RFQ. An
assigned ROT or assigned specialist who
responded to the open RFQ during the
response time or BBO Improvement
Interval may immediately join the requoted market, thus matching for parity
purposes. The original Requesting
Member is not given the first
opportunity to trade on the re-quoted
market, nor is the re-quoting member. If
a trade occurs, that RFQ is no longer
open and a new RFQ is required. The
specialist in the listed non-FLEX equity,
index or U.S. dollar-settled foreign
currency option, whether or not
assigned in FLEX options, must accept
FLEX orders on the FLEX book after
completion of the RFQ process. Only
customer day limit orders may be
placed on the FLEX index, equity or
U.S. dollar-settled foreign currency
option book. Booked orders expire at the
end of each trading day. The limit price
and size must be written on the RFQ
ticket and submitted for dissemination.
In order to trade with the book, an
executing member must quote the
market and announce the trade.11
Today, the Exchange has procedures
for crossing which require that
whenever a Requesting Member intends
to cross, after the BBO is determined,
with or without a BBO Improvement
Interval, the Requesting Member, having
announced an intention to cross, must
bid and offer at or better than the BBO.
If the Requesting Member’s bid/offer is
10 See
proposed Rule 1079(b)(3).
of a bid/offer creates a binding
contract under Exchange Rules.
11 Acceptance
E:\FR\FM\21MYN1.SGM
21MYN1
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 98 / Tuesday, May 21, 2013 / Notices
at the BBO, the Requesting Member may
execute 25% or a fair split, whichever
is greater, of the contra-side of the order
that is the subject of the RFQ. The
remainder of the contra-side is split in
accordance with the parity/priority
provision of subparagraph (3) of Rule
1079(b). If the Requesting Member’s bid/
offer improves the existing BBO, an
assigned ROT or assigned specialist who
responded with a market during the
response time or BBO Improvement
Interval, may immediately join the
Requesting Member’s improved bid or
offer, thus matching for parity purposes.
However, the Requesting Member may
execute 25% or a fair split, whichever
is greater, of the contra-side of the order
that is the subject of the RFQ. The
remainder of the contra-side is split in
accordance with the parity/priority
provision of sub-paragraph (3) of Rule
1079. Broker-dealer crosses and
solicited orders, as defined in Rule
1064, are not eligible for the split
afforded by sub-paragraphs (A) and (B)
of Rule 1079(6), and instead, are, after
the announcement of an intention to
cross, executable in accordance with
sub-paragraph (5) of Rule 1079.
The Exchange proposes to amend the
crossing rules, similar to Amex, in that
the Requesting Member would be
entitled to cross a transaction where the
BBO was matched or improved and
could execute the contra side to the
extent of at least 40% of the trade,
provided the order is a public customer
order or an order respecting the
Requesting Member’s firm proprietary
account.12 The Exchange would not
otherwise limit a market participant’s
ability to cross an order, other market
participants other than public customer
and firm proprietary orders would not
be entitled to execute the contra side of
the trade to the extent of at least 40%
of the trade.
The Exchange does not propose to
amend the current reporting
requirements which require RFQs,
responsive quotes and completed trades
to be promptly reported to OPRA and
disseminated as an administrative text
message.13 Nor does the Exchange
proposes to amend the provisions
related to trading rotations which
provide that there will be no trading
rotations in FLEX options, either at the
opening or at the close of trading.14
Finally, the Exchange does not proposes
to amend the hours of trading must
currently state that FLEX options
trading must be effected during the
hours established by the Exchange.
12 See
proposed Rule 1079(b)(5).
Rule 1079(b)(7).
14 See Rule 1079(b)(8).
13 See
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:07 May 20, 2013
Jkt 229001
Such hours shall be within regular
Exchange trading hours (for the nonFLEX option) on each business day,
except that the Exchange in its
discretion may determine at any time to
narrow or expand FLEX trading hours to
encompass, but not exceed, the trading
hours of the non-FLEX option.15
Provision (c) of Rule 1079 related to
who may trade FLEX Options, provision
(d) relating to position limits and
position (e) related to exercise limits are
not being amended. Section (f) which
provides that FLEX equity and currency
options shall be subject to the exerciseby-exercise procedure of Rule 805 of the
Options Clearing Corporation (‘‘OCC’’)
is being amended to capitalize the OCC
title.
The Exchange is also proposing to
amend Rule 1079(a) to add certain
defined terms in connection with the
proposed amendments to Rule 1079(b).
Specifically, the Exchange proposes to
define the term ‘‘Request for Quotes’’ as
the initial request supplied by a
Requesting Member to initiate FLEX
bidding and offering. The Exchange
proposes to define the term ‘‘Request
Response Time’’ as the minimum period
of time established by the Exchange,
during which Exchange members
participating in FLEX options may
provide FLEX Quotes in response to a
Request for Quotes. The Exchange
proposes to define the term ‘‘FLEX
Quote’’ as (i) FLEX bids and offers
entered by specialists 16 and Registered
Options Traders 17 and (ii) orders to
purchase and orders to sell FLEX
Options entered by Floor Brokers, in
each case in response to a Request for
Quotes. The Exchange proposes to
define the term ‘‘BBO’’ as the best bid
or offer, or both, as applicable, entered
in response to a Request for Quotes. The
Exchange proposes to define the term
‘‘BBO Improvement Interval’’ as the
minimum period of time, to be
established by the Exchange, during
which members may submit FLEX
Quotes to meet or improve the BBO
established during the Request
Response Time.
Finally, the Exchange proposes to
eliminate OFPA F–28, which reiterates
the procedures for quoting and trading
15 See
Rule 1079(b)(9).
specialist is an Exchange member who is
registered as an options specialist pursuant to Rule
1020(a).
17 A Registered Options Trader (‘‘ROT’’) includes
a Streaming Quote Trader (‘‘SQT’’), a Remote
Streaming Quote Trader and a Non-SQT, which by
definition is neither a SQT or a RSQT. A Registered
Option Trader is defined in Exchange Rule 1014(b)
as a regular member of the Exchange located on the
trading floor who has received permission from the
Exchange to trade in options for his own account.
See Exchange Rule 1014 (b)(i) and (ii).
16 A
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
29799
FLEX options similar to Rule 1079, as
this rule is no longer necessary. OFPA–
F28 was enacted to parallel most of the
provisions in Rule 1079(b), including
those pertaining to requesting
quotations, responses, determining the
BBO, the BBO Improvement Interval,
executing a trade and crossing. OFPA F–
28 does not contain a fine schedule and
is not included in the Exchange’s minor
rule violation enforcement and
reporting plan.18 The Exchange noted in
its rule change that the purpose of
adopting OFPA F–28 was to incorporate
it into the Floor Procedure Advice
Handbook for easy reference on the
trading floor.19
The Exchange believes that these
amendments to the FLEX rules to model
the rules after the current Amex rules,
streamlines the current process for
quoting and trading FLEX Options.
Amex initially amended its rule in
2006 20 to increase the participation
guarantee of a Requesting Member from
25% to 40% of the order.21 Amex noted
in its filing that they believed that
providing Requesting Members or
Requesting Member firms who are
eligible to trade FLEX options and are
seeking to cross or facilitate a trade with
an across-the-board 40% member firm
guarantee will provide an additional
incentive for such Requesting Member
or Requesting Member firm to bring
large FLEX orders to the floor of the
Amex rather than to the floor of another
options exchange or to the over-thecounter (‘‘OTC’’) market.22
Additionally, Amex noted that the
liquidity provided by such Requesting
Member or Requesting Member firm
seeking to facilitate their orders gives
the Exchange the ability to provide deep
liquid markets for investors.
The Exchange believes that the
amendments proposed to Rule 1079(b)
would also allow Phlx to remain
competitive with other options
exchanges. The proposal streamlines the
current FLEX rules related to quoting
and trading FLEX options and creates
new opportunities for members and
member organizations to trade FLEX
options on the floor of the Exchange.
The proposal provides for transparency
in displaying the terms and
specifications of the RFQ at the post and
continues to provide for the
dissemination of information through
18 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 39549
(January 14, 1998), 63 FR 3601 (January 23, 1998)
(SR–Phlx–96–38).
19 Id.
20 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54104
(July 5, 2006), 71 FR 39374 (July 12, 2006) (SR–
Amex–2006–47).
21 Id.
22 Id.
E:\FR\FM\21MYN1.SGM
21MYN1
29800
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 98 / Tuesday, May 21, 2013 / Notices
OPRA. The proposal eliminates the
minimum response times imposed by
the current rules and instead adopts
Amex’s more flexible approach to
permit responses during the Request
Response Time as designated by the
Exchange. The amendments provide for
opportunities to match or improve the
BBO and sets priority rules as first in
time as compared to price, as is the case
today. The Exchange believes that these
rules will permit the Exchange to
remain competitive and will continue to
encourage market participants to shift
OTC options trading to the Exchange in
order to eliminate counter-party risk.
The Exchange is proposing to increase
its guarantee from 25% to 40%
consistent with current firm facilitation
guarantees and, similar to Amex, offer
requesting members that cross public
customer and firm proprietary orders
the opportunity to participate in 40% of
the trade.23 The Exchange believes that,
as noted in the Amex filing, the
liquidity provided by such Requesting
Member or Requesting Member firm
seeking to facilitate their orders gives
the Exchange the ability to provide deep
liquid markets for investors. The
Exchange believes this proposal will
allow the Exchange to remain
competitive with other options
exchanges and provide a comparable
alternative to the OTC market.
The Exchange proposes, similar to
Amex Rule 904G(f), to limit crossing
orders that are entitled to participate in
the trade and be guaranteed at least 40%
of the trade to public customer orders
and firm proprietary orders. Unlike
Amex, the Exchange would not
otherwise limit a market participant’s
ability to effect a crossing transaction.
The Exchange is proposing to permit all
market participants to cross a
transaction, as is the case today. The
Exchange does not believe this proposal
would amend the current practice of
permitting market participants to
participate in crossing orders, except for
Broker-Dealer crosses which today are
not eligible for the split referenced in
current Rule 1079(b)(6)(A) and (B),24 but
they are executable as described in
23 See
Exchange Rule 1064 at Commentary .02.
if the Requesting Member’s bid/offer is
at the BBO, the Requesting Member may execute
25% or a fair split, whichever is greater, of the
contra-side of the order that is the subject of the
RFQ. If the Requesting Member’s bid/offer improves
the existing BBO, an assigned ROT or assigned
Specialist who responded with a market during the
response time or BBO Improvement Interval, may
immediately join the Requesting Member’s
improved bid or offer, thus matching for parity
purposes. However, the Requesting Member may
execute 25% or a fair split, whichever is greater, of
the contra-side of the order that is the subject of the
RFQ.
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
24 Today,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:07 May 20, 2013
Jkt 229001
current Rule 1079(b)(5). The proposal
would permit all market participants to
effect crossing transactions, which is not
a departure from the current rule, but
would limit crossing orders that are
entitled to participate in the trade and
receive the 40% guarantee to public
customer orders and firm proprietary
orders, which is not a change for BrokerDealers but is a change for other market
participants that today may be eligible
for the 25% guarantee in the current
rule.
The Exchange is not adopting
language in Amex Rule 904(G)(g). The
Exchange does not trade the particular
currencies listed in 904(G)(g) and is
therefore not adopting language similar
to section 904G(g).25
In addition, the Exchange proposes in
Rule 1079(b)(1) to immediately
announce the terms and specifications
of the RFQ at the specialist post instead
of posting the terms and specifications.
The practice of announcing terms at the
post is in line with current practices on
Phlx’s floor. The Exchange will
continue to disseminate an
administrative text message through
OPRA, as is the case today.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the provisions of Section 6 of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Exchange Act’’),26 in general, and with
Section 6(b)(5) of the Exchange Act,27 in
particular, in that the proposal is
designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
FLEX options permit customization of
certain variable terms as agreed between
the buyer and seller. The Exchange
believes that its proposed rules allow
market participants to continue to trade
FLEX options in a transparent
environment with the same requisite
disclosure requirements in order to
ensure that presence of a price
discovery process for such orders on the
Exchange’s trading floor. The Exchange
believes that the proposed amendments
will create new opportunities for
members and member organizations to
trade FLEX options. The amendments
create clear guidelines for transacting
25 The Exchange has separate rules relating to
trading FLEX foreign currencies minimum
increments. See Exchange Rule 1005C.
26 15 U.S.C. 78f.
27 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
FLEX options, which are complicated
customized options. Additionally, the
amendments streamline the process and
adopt procedures for quoting and
trading FLEX options similar to Amex.28
The Exchange desires to provide
investors deep liquid markets in which
to trade FLEX options and believes that
adopting rules similar to Amex will
allow the Exchange to provide investors
the tools to transact FLEX options in a
transparent environment.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
Exchange proposes to adopt rules to
permit the quoting and trading of FLEX
options on the Exchange’s trading floor
similar to Amex.29 The Exchange
believes that its ability to remain
competitive and provide market
participants multiple venues in which
to trade FLEX options in a similar
manner benefits market participants by
providing them choices in which to seek
markets to transact these products. The
Exchange believes that this filing does
not impose a burden on competition in
as much as the rules are not novel but
rather are the same as the rules of Amex.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule
change does not: (i) Significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) become
operative for 30 days from the date on
which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate, it has
become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act 30 and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b–4
thereunder.31
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is: (i) Necessary or appropriate in
28 See
note 19. [sic]
29 Id.
30 15
31 17
E:\FR\FM\21MYN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(a)(ii). [sic]
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
21MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 98 / Tuesday, May 21, 2013 / Notices
the public interest; (ii) for the protection
of investors; or (iii) otherwise in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved. The
Exchange has provided the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the
proposed rule change, along with a brief
description and text of the proposed
rule change, at least five business days
prior to the date of filing of the
proposed rule change.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–Phlx–2013–50 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR-Phlx-2013–50. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used.
To help the Commission process and
review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The
Commission will post all comments on
the Commission’s Internet Web site
(https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room on official business
days between the hours of 10:00 a.m.
and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also
will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. All comments received will
be posted without change; the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:07 May 20, 2013
Jkt 229001
Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–Phlx–
2013–50, and should be submitted on or
before June 11, 2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.32
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–12040 Filed 5–20–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–69588; File No. SR–Phlx–
2013–51]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of
Filing of Proposed Rule Change to Its
Schedule of Fees and Rebates for
Execution of Quotes and Orders on
NASDAQ OMX PSX
May 15, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that, on May 3,
2013, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC
(‘‘Phlx’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed
rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III, below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes changes to its
schedule of fees and rebates for
execution of quotes and orders on
NASDAQ OMX PSX (‘‘PSX’’). Phlx
proposes to implement the proposed
rule change on May 3, 2013. The text of
the proposed rule change is available on
the Exchange’s Web site at https://
nasdaqomxphlx.cchwallstreet.com, at
the principal office of the Exchange, and
at the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
32 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
29801
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Commission recently approved
modifications to the rules governing the
operation of Phlx’s PSX trading platform
in order to replace its price/size/pro rata
allocation model with a price/time
model, and to permit member
organizations to register as market
makers in securities traded on PSX.3
Phlx is now proposing to modify its
schedule of fees and rebates for
transactions occurring on PSX.
Currently, the Exchange charges the
following fees for execution of orders
that access liquidity on PSX: A volumebased discounted fee of $0.0028 per
share executed for an order entered
through a market participant identifier
(‘‘MPID’’) through which a member
organization provides shares of liquidity
that represent more than 0.10% of
Consolidated Volume 4 during the
month; $0.0028 per share executed for
an order that is designated as eligible for
routing, and $0.0030 per share executed
for other orders. The Exchange is
proposing to reduce significantly the
criterion for the volume-based
discounted fee, from 0.10% of
Consolidated Volume to an average
daily volume of 10,000 or more shares
of liquidity provided. Moreover, for
securities listed on the NASDAQ Stock
Market (‘‘NASDAQ’’) or the New York
Stock Exchange (‘‘NYSE’’), Phlx
proposes to lower the volume-based
discounted fee to $0.00275 per share
executed. For securities listed on
exchanges other than NASDAQ or
NYSE, the Exchange proposes to make
3 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 69452
(April 25, 2013), 78 FR 25512 (May 1, 2013) (SR–
Phlx–2013–24).
4 ‘‘Consolidated Volume’’ is defined as the total
consolidated volume reported to all consolidated
transaction reporting plans by all exchanges and
trade reporting facilities.
E:\FR\FM\21MYN1.SGM
21MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 98 (Tuesday, May 21, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29797-29801]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-12040]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-69586; File No. SR-Phlx-2013-50]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to
FLEX Options
May 15, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 \2\ thereunder, notice is hereby given
that on May 2, 2013, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC (``Phlx'' or ``Exchange'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III, below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend Exchange Rule 1079 entitled ``FLEX,
Index, Equity and Currency Options'' and Option Floor Procedure Advice
(``OFPA'') F-28 entitled ``Trading FLEX Index, Equity and Currency
Options.''
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Web site at https://www.nasdaqtrader.com/micro.aspx?id=PHLXRulefilings,
at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule change is to amend Exchange Rule
1079(a) which concerns the characteristics applicable to FLEX options
and 1079(b) and eliminate OFPA F-28 which concerns the procedures for
quoting and trading FLEX options.\3\ The Exchange is proposing to amend
its FLEX rules in Rule 1079 to establish the same procedures for
quoting and trading FLEX options as exist today on NYSE MKT LLC
(``Amex'').\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The term ``FLEX option'' means a FLEX option contract that
is traded subject to this Rule. Although FLEX options are generally
subject to the rules in this section, to the extent that the
provisions of this Rule are inconsistent with other applicable
Exchange rules, this Rule takes precedence with respect to FLEX
options.
\4\ See Amex Rule 904G (FLEX Trading Procedures and Principles).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Today, a Requesting Member shall obtain quotes and execute trades
in certain non-listed FLEX options at the specialist post of the non-
FLEX option on the Exchange. The Requesting Member is a Phlx member
qualified to trade FLEX options pursuant to paragraph (c) of Rule 1079
who initiates a FLEX Request For Quotes (``RFQ'') pursuant to paragraph
(b) of Rule 1079. FLEX options are not continuously quoted and series
are not pre-established.\5\ Today a Requesting Member may initiate an
RFQ by first announcing all of the following contract terms to the
trading crowd of the non-FLEX option and then submitting an RFQ ticket
to that specialist post: (1) Underlying index, security or foreign
currency, (2) type, size and crossing intention (3) in the case of FLEX
index options and FLEX equity options, exercise style, (4) expiration
date, (5) exercise price, and, (6) respecting index options, the
settlement value. Thereafter, on receipt of an RFQ in proper form, the
assigned specialist or Requesting Member shall cause the terms of the
RFQ to be disseminated as an administrative text message through the
Options Price Reporting Authority (``OPRA'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The Exchange's electronic quoting and trading system is not
available for FLEX options. The variable terms of FLEX options shall
be established through the process described in Rule 1079. All
transactions must be in compliance with Section 11 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules promulgated thereunder, which may
include yielding priority to customer orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to adopt rules, similar to Amex, which
requires a Requesting Member to submit to the FLEX Specialist an RFQ
utilizing for that purpose the forms, formats and procedures
established by the Exchange. Thereafter, on receipt of an RFQ in proper
form, the assigned FLEX Specialist shall cause the terms and
specifications of the RFQ to be immediately announced at the post. Such
communication shall be disseminated as an administrative text message
through the Options Price Reporting Authority (``OPRA'').\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See proposed Rule 1079(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Today, following the RFQ announcement, a preset response time will
begin, during which members may provide responsive quotes. The response
time, between two and 15 minutes, will be determined by the Exchange.
During the response time, members may provide responsive quotes to the
RFQ, which may be entered, modified or withdrawn during such response
time. Each assigned ROT
[[Page 29798]]
and assigned specialist \7\ who responds is required to respond with a
market of the minimum size, but is not required to provide continuous
quotes or a minimum bid-offer differential (quotation spread
parameters).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Pursuant to Rule 1079(c), a ROT or specialist may apply on a
form prescribed by the Exchange to be assigned in FLEX options. At
least two members shall be assigned to each FLEX option. Only the
specialist in the non-FLEX option may be the assigned specialist in
that FLEX option (``FLEX Specialist''). The provisions of Rule
1014(c) regarding market making obligations shall be applicable to
assigned ROTs and assigned specialists, such that a market must be
provided in any FLEX option when requested by an Options Exchange
Official. The Exchange proposes to define ``FLEX Specialist'' within
Rule 1079(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to adopt rules, similar to Amex, which
provide that Members may enter at the FLEX post FLEX Quotes responsive
to each Request for Quotes. FLEX Quotes must be entered during the
Request Response Time.\8\ Each FLEX Quote shall refer to a reference
indicator as the Exchange determines appropriate from time to time. All
FLEX Quotes may be entered, modified or withdrawn at any point during
the Request Response Time. At the expiration of the Request Response
Time, the best bid or offer (``BBO'') shall be identified in accordance
with the price and time priority principles set forth by the
Exchange.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ The Exchange proposes to notify its members of the time
period for the Request Response Time by issuing a memorandum to the
Exchange members on the trading floor. The Exchange intends to
provide a reasonable notice period to members if it determines to
change the Request Response Time.
\9\ See proposed Rule 1079(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Today, with respect to the BBO, at the end of the response time,
the assigned specialist, or if none, the Requesting Member shall
determine the BBO, based on price, but not time or size. However, where
two or more bids/offers are at parity, bids/offers submitted by an
assigned specialist, assigned ROT or customer will have priority over
bids/offers submitted by non-assigned ROTs and by controlled accounts
as defined in Rule 1014(g)(i). The BBO shall be disseminated with
reference to the corresponding RFQ. Further, if the Requesting Member
rejects the BBO or the BBO is for less than the entire size requested,
the BBO Improvement Interval provides a two minute time period during
which the BBO may be matched or improved. An assigned ROT or assigned
specialist who responded with a market during the response time may
immediately join any new BBO. The new BBO shall be determined, and
disseminated with reference to the corresponding RFQ.
The Exchange proposes to amend this portion of the rule to instead
state, similar to Amex, that at the expiration of the Request Response
Time, the BBO shall be displayed on such market data systems as are
available. If the Requesting Member has not indicated an intention to
cross or act as principal with respect to any part of the FLEX trade,
the member shall promptly accept or reject the displayed BBO: Provided,
however, that if such a Requesting Member either rejects the BBO or is
given a BBO for less than the entire size requested, all FLEX
participating members other than the Requesting Member will have an
opportunity during the BBO Improvement Interval in which to match, or
improve, (as applicable), the BBO. At the expiration of any such BBO
Improvement Interval, the Requesting Member must promptly accept or
reject the BBO(s). If the Requesting Member has indicated an intention
to cross or act as principal with respect to any part of the FLEX
trade, acceptance of the displayed BBO shall be automatically delayed
until the expiration of the BBO Improvement Interval. Prior to the BBO
Improvement Interval, the Requesting Member must indicate at the post
the price at which the member expects to trade. In these circumstances,
the Requesting Member may participate with all other FLEX-participating
members in attempting to improve or match the BBO during the BBO
Improvement Interval. At expiration of the BBO Improvement Interval,
the Requesting Member must promptly accept or reject the BBO(s). The
Requesting Member has no obligation to accept any FLEX bid or offer.
Whenever, following the completion of FLEX bidding and offering
responsive to a given RFQs, the Requesting Member rejects the BBO or
the BBO size exceeds the FLEX transaction size indicated in the RFQs,
members may accept the entire order or the unfilled balance of the BBO.
The highest bid shall have priority, but where the two or more best
bids are submitted at the same price, the bid(s) submitted first in
time will have priority. The lowest offer shall have priority, but
where the two or more best offers are submitted at the same price, the
offer(s) submitted first in time will have priority. In the case of
FLEX equity options only and notwithstanding Rule 1079(b)(4), whenever
the Requesting Member has indicated an intention to cross or act as
principal on the trade and has matched or improved the BBO during the
BBO Improvement Interval, the Requesting Member will be permitted to
execute the contra side of the trade that is the subject of the RFQs,
to the extent of at least 40% of the trade, provided the order is a
public customer order or an order respecting the Requesting Member's
firm proprietary account. Notwithstanding the foregoing, all market
participants may effect crossing transactions.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See proposed Rule 1079(b)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange would eliminate the provisions that today describe
trading, such that a trade in FLEX options cannot be executed until the
end of the response time or BBO Improvement Interval. Today, once the
response time or Improvement Interval ends, the Requesting Member is
given the first opportunity to trade on the market, by voicing a bid/
offer in the trading crowd. The Requesting Member has no obligation to
accept any bid or offer for a FLEX option. If the Requesting Member
rejects the BBO or the BBO size exceeds the entire size requested,
another member may promptly accept such BBO or the unfilled balance of
the BBO. Once the BBO is established and no trade has occurred, the RFQ
remains open during that trading day, such that a member may re-quote
the market with respect to the open RFQ, as opposed to submitting an
additional RFQ. An assigned ROT or assigned specialist who responded to
the open RFQ during the response time or BBO Improvement Interval may
immediately join the re-quoted market, thus matching for parity
purposes. The original Requesting Member is not given the first
opportunity to trade on the re-quoted market, nor is the re-quoting
member. If a trade occurs, that RFQ is no longer open and a new RFQ is
required. The specialist in the listed non-FLEX equity, index or U.S.
dollar-settled foreign currency option, whether or not assigned in FLEX
options, must accept FLEX orders on the FLEX book after completion of
the RFQ process. Only customer day limit orders may be placed on the
FLEX index, equity or U.S. dollar-settled foreign currency option book.
Booked orders expire at the end of each trading day. The limit price
and size must be written on the RFQ ticket and submitted for
dissemination. In order to trade with the book, an executing member
must quote the market and announce the trade.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ Acceptance of a bid/offer creates a binding contract under
Exchange Rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Today, the Exchange has procedures for crossing which require that
whenever a Requesting Member intends to cross, after the BBO is
determined, with or without a BBO Improvement Interval, the Requesting
Member, having announced an intention to cross, must bid and offer at
or better than the BBO. If the Requesting Member's bid/offer is
[[Page 29799]]
at the BBO, the Requesting Member may execute 25% or a fair split,
whichever is greater, of the contra-side of the order that is the
subject of the RFQ. The remainder of the contra-side is split in
accordance with the parity/priority provision of subparagraph (3) of
Rule 1079(b). If the Requesting Member's bid/offer improves the
existing BBO, an assigned ROT or assigned specialist who responded with
a market during the response time or BBO Improvement Interval, may
immediately join the Requesting Member's improved bid or offer, thus
matching for parity purposes. However, the Requesting Member may
execute 25% or a fair split, whichever is greater, of the contra-side
of the order that is the subject of the RFQ. The remainder of the
contra-side is split in accordance with the parity/priority provision
of sub-paragraph (3) of Rule 1079. Broker-dealer crosses and solicited
orders, as defined in Rule 1064, are not eligible for the split
afforded by sub-paragraphs (A) and (B) of Rule 1079(6), and instead,
are, after the announcement of an intention to cross, executable in
accordance with sub-paragraph (5) of Rule 1079.
The Exchange proposes to amend the crossing rules, similar to Amex,
in that the Requesting Member would be entitled to cross a transaction
where the BBO was matched or improved and could execute the contra side
to the extent of at least 40% of the trade, provided the order is a
public customer order or an order respecting the Requesting Member's
firm proprietary account.\12\ The Exchange would not otherwise limit a
market participant's ability to cross an order, other market
participants other than public customer and firm proprietary orders
would not be entitled to execute the contra side of the trade to the
extent of at least 40% of the trade.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See proposed Rule 1079(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange does not propose to amend the current reporting
requirements which require RFQs, responsive quotes and completed trades
to be promptly reported to OPRA and disseminated as an administrative
text message.\13\ Nor does the Exchange proposes to amend the
provisions related to trading rotations which provide that there will
be no trading rotations in FLEX options, either at the opening or at
the close of trading.\14\ Finally, the Exchange does not proposes to
amend the hours of trading must currently state that FLEX options
trading must be effected during the hours established by the Exchange.
Such hours shall be within regular Exchange trading hours (for the non-
FLEX option) on each business day, except that the Exchange in its
discretion may determine at any time to narrow or expand FLEX trading
hours to encompass, but not exceed, the trading hours of the non-FLEX
option.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See Rule 1079(b)(7).
\14\ See Rule 1079(b)(8).
\15\ See Rule 1079(b)(9).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Provision (c) of Rule 1079 related to who may trade FLEX Options,
provision (d) relating to position limits and position (e) related to
exercise limits are not being amended. Section (f) which provides that
FLEX equity and currency options shall be subject to the exercise-by-
exercise procedure of Rule 805 of the Options Clearing Corporation
(``OCC'') is being amended to capitalize the OCC title.
The Exchange is also proposing to amend Rule 1079(a) to add certain
defined terms in connection with the proposed amendments to Rule
1079(b). Specifically, the Exchange proposes to define the term
``Request for Quotes'' as the initial request supplied by a Requesting
Member to initiate FLEX bidding and offering. The Exchange proposes to
define the term ``Request Response Time'' as the minimum period of time
established by the Exchange, during which Exchange members
participating in FLEX options may provide FLEX Quotes in response to a
Request for Quotes. The Exchange proposes to define the term ``FLEX
Quote'' as (i) FLEX bids and offers entered by specialists \16\ and
Registered Options Traders \17\ and (ii) orders to purchase and orders
to sell FLEX Options entered by Floor Brokers, in each case in response
to a Request for Quotes. The Exchange proposes to define the term
``BBO'' as the best bid or offer, or both, as applicable, entered in
response to a Request for Quotes. The Exchange proposes to define the
term ``BBO Improvement Interval'' as the minimum period of time, to be
established by the Exchange, during which members may submit FLEX
Quotes to meet or improve the BBO established during the Request
Response Time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ A specialist is an Exchange member who is registered as an
options specialist pursuant to Rule 1020(a).
\17\ A Registered Options Trader (``ROT'') includes a Streaming
Quote Trader (``SQT''), a Remote Streaming Quote Trader and a Non-
SQT, which by definition is neither a SQT or a RSQT. A Registered
Option Trader is defined in Exchange Rule 1014(b) as a regular
member of the Exchange located on the trading floor who has received
permission from the Exchange to trade in options for his own
account. See Exchange Rule 1014 (b)(i) and (ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, the Exchange proposes to eliminate OFPA F-28, which
reiterates the procedures for quoting and trading FLEX options similar
to Rule 1079, as this rule is no longer necessary. OFPA-F28 was enacted
to parallel most of the provisions in Rule 1079(b), including those
pertaining to requesting quotations, responses, determining the BBO,
the BBO Improvement Interval, executing a trade and crossing. OFPA F-28
does not contain a fine schedule and is not included in the Exchange's
minor rule violation enforcement and reporting plan.\18\ The Exchange
noted in its rule change that the purpose of adopting OFPA F-28 was to
incorporate it into the Floor Procedure Advice Handbook for easy
reference on the trading floor.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 39549 (January 14,
1998), 63 FR 3601 (January 23, 1998) (SR-Phlx-96-38).
\19\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that these amendments to the FLEX rules to
model the rules after the current Amex rules, streamlines the current
process for quoting and trading FLEX Options. Amex initially amended
its rule in 2006 \20\ to increase the participation guarantee of a
Requesting Member from 25% to 40% of the order.\21\ Amex noted in its
filing that they believed that providing Requesting Members or
Requesting Member firms who are eligible to trade FLEX options and are
seeking to cross or facilitate a trade with an across-the-board 40%
member firm guarantee will provide an additional incentive for such
Requesting Member or Requesting Member firm to bring large FLEX orders
to the floor of the Amex rather than to the floor of another options
exchange or to the over-the-counter (``OTC'') market.\22\ Additionally,
Amex noted that the liquidity provided by such Requesting Member or
Requesting Member firm seeking to facilitate their orders gives the
Exchange the ability to provide deep liquid markets for investors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54104 (July 5,
2006), 71 FR 39374 (July 12, 2006) (SR-Amex-2006-47).
\21\ Id.
\22\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the amendments proposed to Rule 1079(b)
would also allow Phlx to remain competitive with other options
exchanges. The proposal streamlines the current FLEX rules related to
quoting and trading FLEX options and creates new opportunities for
members and member organizations to trade FLEX options on the floor of
the Exchange. The proposal provides for transparency in displaying the
terms and specifications of the RFQ at the post and continues to
provide for the dissemination of information through
[[Page 29800]]
OPRA. The proposal eliminates the minimum response times imposed by the
current rules and instead adopts Amex's more flexible approach to
permit responses during the Request Response Time as designated by the
Exchange. The amendments provide for opportunities to match or improve
the BBO and sets priority rules as first in time as compared to price,
as is the case today. The Exchange believes that these rules will
permit the Exchange to remain competitive and will continue to
encourage market participants to shift OTC options trading to the
Exchange in order to eliminate counter-party risk. The Exchange is
proposing to increase its guarantee from 25% to 40% consistent with
current firm facilitation guarantees and, similar to Amex, offer
requesting members that cross public customer and firm proprietary
orders the opportunity to participate in 40% of the trade.\23\ The
Exchange believes that, as noted in the Amex filing, the liquidity
provided by such Requesting Member or Requesting Member firm seeking to
facilitate their orders gives the Exchange the ability to provide deep
liquid markets for investors. The Exchange believes this proposal will
allow the Exchange to remain competitive with other options exchanges
and provide a comparable alternative to the OTC market.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ See Exchange Rule 1064 at Commentary .02.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes, similar to Amex Rule 904G(f), to limit
crossing orders that are entitled to participate in the trade and be
guaranteed at least 40% of the trade to public customer orders and firm
proprietary orders. Unlike Amex, the Exchange would not otherwise limit
a market participant's ability to effect a crossing transaction. The
Exchange is proposing to permit all market participants to cross a
transaction, as is the case today. The Exchange does not believe this
proposal would amend the current practice of permitting market
participants to participate in crossing orders, except for Broker-
Dealer crosses which today are not eligible for the split referenced in
current Rule 1079(b)(6)(A) and (B),\24\ but they are executable as
described in current Rule 1079(b)(5). The proposal would permit all
market participants to effect crossing transactions, which is not a
departure from the current rule, but would limit crossing orders that
are entitled to participate in the trade and receive the 40% guarantee
to public customer orders and firm proprietary orders, which is not a
change for Broker-Dealers but is a change for other market participants
that today may be eligible for the 25% guarantee in the current rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ Today, if the Requesting Member's bid/offer is at the BBO,
the Requesting Member may execute 25% or a fair split, whichever is
greater, of the contra-side of the order that is the subject of the
RFQ. If the Requesting Member's bid/offer improves the existing BBO,
an assigned ROT or assigned Specialist who responded with a market
during the response time or BBO Improvement Interval, may
immediately join the Requesting Member's improved bid or offer, thus
matching for parity purposes. However, the Requesting Member may
execute 25% or a fair split, whichever is greater, of the contra-
side of the order that is the subject of the RFQ.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange is not adopting language in Amex Rule 904(G)(g). The
Exchange does not trade the particular currencies listed in 904(G)(g)
and is therefore not adopting language similar to section 904G(g).\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ The Exchange has separate rules relating to trading FLEX
foreign currencies minimum increments. See Exchange Rule 1005C.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, the Exchange proposes in Rule 1079(b)(1) to
immediately announce the terms and specifications of the RFQ at the
specialist post instead of posting the terms and specifications. The
practice of announcing terms at the post is in line with current
practices on Phlx's floor. The Exchange will continue to disseminate an
administrative text message through OPRA, as is the case today.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the provisions of Section 6 of the Securities and Exchange Act of
1934 (``Exchange Act''),\26\ in general, and with Section 6(b)(5) of
the Exchange Act,\27\ in particular, in that the proposal is designed
to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote
just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
\27\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FLEX options permit customization of certain variable terms as
agreed between the buyer and seller. The Exchange believes that its
proposed rules allow market participants to continue to trade FLEX
options in a transparent environment with the same requisite disclosure
requirements in order to ensure that presence of a price discovery
process for such orders on the Exchange's trading floor. The Exchange
believes that the proposed amendments will create new opportunities for
members and member organizations to trade FLEX options. The amendments
create clear guidelines for transacting FLEX options, which are
complicated customized options. Additionally, the amendments streamline
the process and adopt procedures for quoting and trading FLEX options
similar to Amex.\28\ The Exchange desires to provide investors deep
liquid markets in which to trade FLEX options and believes that
adopting rules similar to Amex will allow the Exchange to provide
investors the tools to transact FLEX options in a transparent
environment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ See note 19. [sic]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange proposes to adopt
rules to permit the quoting and trading of FLEX options on the
Exchange's trading floor similar to Amex.\29\ The Exchange believes
that its ability to remain competitive and provide market participants
multiple venues in which to trade FLEX options in a similar manner
benefits market participants by providing them choices in which to seek
markets to transact these products. The Exchange believes that this
filing does not impose a burden on competition in as much as the rules
are not novel but rather are the same as the rules of Amex.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \30\ and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\31\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(a)(ii). [sic]
\31\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i)
Necessary or appropriate in
[[Page 29801]]
the public interest; (ii) for the protection of investors; or (iii)
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
The Exchange has provided the Commission written notice of its intent
to file the proposed rule change, along with a brief description and
text of the proposed rule change, at least five business days prior to
the date of filing of the proposed rule change.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-Phlx-2013-50 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2013-50. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site
viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room on
official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m.
Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying
at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be
posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2013-50, and should be submitted on
or before June 11, 2013.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\32\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\32\
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-12040 Filed 5-20-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P