Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change for the Permanent Approval of the Exchange's Pilot Program To Permit the Exchange To Accept Inbound Options Orders Routed by Nasdaq Options Services LLC From NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc., 26826-26828 [2013-10873]

Download as PDF 26826 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 89 / Wednesday, May 8, 2013 / Notices • In addition, DTC will modify its Policy Statement on the Admission of Non-U.S. Entities as Direct Depository Participants to reference the Rules requirements of foreign entities which are treated as non-U.S. entities for tax purposes. • Sections 17A(b)(3)(F) 10 and 17A(b)(3)(D) 11 of the Exchange Act require that registered clearing agencies be designed to promote the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions, and the safeguarding of funds related thereto, and that the rules of such clearing agencies provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among their participants. DTC believes the proposed rule changes are designed to promote the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions by eliminating any uncertainty in funds settlement that would arise if DTC were subject to Gross Proceeds Withholding obligations under FATCA. The proposed rule changes are also designed to maintain fairness in the allocation of costs among Participants of DTC because these proposed rule changes allow DTC to comply with FATCA Regulations without developing and maintaining a complex Gross Proceeds Withholding system, the cost of which, as discussed above, would be passed on to DTC’s Participants at large for the benefit of a small number of nonparticipating FFI Members. (B) Clearing Agency’s Statement on Burden on Competition DTC does not believe that the proposed rule change will have any impact, or impose any burden, on competition. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES (C) Clearing Agency’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received from Members, Participants, or Others DTC has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit, comments regarding the proposed rule changes. DTC has not received any unsolicited written comments from interested parties. To the extent DTC receives written comments on the proposed rule changes, DTC will forward such comments to the Commission. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register or within such longer period up to 90 days (i) as the Commission may 10 12 11 12 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F). U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(D). VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:56 May 07, 2013 Jkt 229001 designate if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will: (A) By order approve or disapprove such proposed rule change, or (B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Exchange Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–DTC–2013–03 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–DTC–2013–03. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of DTC and on DTC’s Web site: https://www.dtcc.com/legal/rule_filings/ dtc/2013.php. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal PO 00000 Frm 00080 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–DTC– 2013–03 and should be submitted on or before May 29, 2013. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.12 Kevin M. O’Neill, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2013–10871 Filed 5–7–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–69498; File No. SR–Phlx– 2013–42] Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change for the Permanent Approval of the Exchange’s Pilot Program To Permit the Exchange To Accept Inbound Options Orders Routed by Nasdaq Options Services LLC From NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc. May 2, 2013. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3 notice is hereby given that, on April 23, 2013, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘Phlx’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes a rule change for the permanent approval of the Exchange’s pilot program to permit the Exchange to accept inbound options orders routed by Nasdaq Options Services LLC (‘‘NOS’’) from NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc. (‘‘BX’’). II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for 12 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). U.S.C.78s(b)(1). 2 15 U.S.C. 78a. 3 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 1 15 E:\FR\FM\08MYN1.SGM 08MYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 89 / Wednesday, May 8, 2013 / Notices 1. Purpose In conjunction with BX providing outbound routing services to all options markets using its affiliated routing broker, NOS,4 Phlx proposed that NOS be permitted to route orders from BX to Phlx on a pilot basis, subject to certain limitations and conditions, as described below.5 The current pilot program expires June 28, 2013. NOS is a broker-dealer and member of The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (‘‘NASDAQ’’), PHLX and BX. NOS provides all routing functions for BX Options, Phlx, NASDAQ and NASDAQ Options Market (‘‘NOM’’). BX, NASDAQ, NOM, Phlx and NOS are affiliates.6 Accordingly, the affiliate relationship between Phlx and NOS, its member, raises the issue of an exchange’s affiliation with a member of such exchange. Specifically, in connection with prior filings, the Commission has expressed concern that the affiliation of an exchange with one of its members raises the potential for unfair competitive advantage and potential conflicts of interest between an exchange’s self-regulatory obligations and its commercial interests.7 Recognizing that the Commission has previously expressed concern regarding the potential for conflicts of interest in instances where a member firm is affiliated with an exchange of which it is a member, the Exchange previously proposed, and the Commission approved, limitations and conditions on NOS’s affiliation with the Exchange.8 Also recognizing that the Commission has expressed concern regarding the potential for conflicts of interest in instances where a member firm is affiliated with an exchange to which it is routing orders, the Exchange previously proposed, and the Commission approved,9 NOS’s affiliation with the Exchange to permit the Exchange to accept inbound orders that NOS routes in its capacity as a facility of BX, subject to the certain limitations and conditions. The Exchange now proposes to permit Phlx to accept inbound options orders that NOS routes in its capacity as a facility of BX on a permanent basis, subject to the limitations and conditions of this pilot: • First, the Exchange and FINRA maintain a Regulatory Contract, as well as an agreement pursuant to Rule 17d– 2 under the Act (‘‘17d–2 Agreement’’).10 Pursuant to the Regulatory Contract and the 17d–2 Agreement, FINRA is allocated regulatory responsibilities to review NOS’s compliance with certain Exchange rules.11 Pursuant to the Regulatory Contract, however, Phlx retains ultimate responsibility for enforcing its rules with respect to NOS. • Second, FINRA monitors NOS for compliance with the Exchange’s trading rules, and collects and maintains certain related information.12 • Third, FINRA provides a report to the Exchange’s chief regulatory officer (‘‘CRO’’), on a quarterly basis, that: (i) Quantifies all alerts (of which FINRA is aware) that identify NOS as a participant that has potentially violated Commission or Exchange rules, and (ii) lists all investigations that identify NOS as a participant that has potentially violated Commission or Exchange rules. 4 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67256 (June 26, 2012), 77 FR 39277 (July 2, 2012) (SR–BX– 2012–030). 5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67294 (June 28, 2012), 77 FR 39771 (July 5, 2012) (SR– Phlx–2012–68). 6 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 58324 (August 7, 2008), 73 FR 46936 (August 12, 2008) (SR–BSE–2008–02; SR–BSE–2008–23; SR–BSE– 2008–25; SR–BSECC–2008–01) (order approving NASDAQ OMX’s acquisition of BX); and 58179 (July 17, 2008), 73 FR 42874 (July 23, 2008) (SR– Phlx–2008–31) (order approving NASDAQ OMX’s acquisition of Phlx). 7 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 59153 (December 23, 2008), 73 FR 80485 (December 31, 2008) (SR–NASDAQ–2008–098); and 62736 (August 17, 2010), 75 FR 51861 (August 23, 2010) (SR– NASDAQ–2010–100). See also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58135 (July 10, 2008), 73 FR 40898 (July 16, 2008) (SR–NASDAQ–2008–061) (permitting NOS to be affiliated with Phlx). 8 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59995 (May 28, 2009), 74 FR 26750 (June 3, 2009) (SR– Phlx–2009–32). 9 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67294 (June 28, 2012), 77 FR 39771 (July 5, 2012) (SR– Phlx–2012–68). 10 17 CFR 240.17d–2. 11 NOS is also subject to independent oversight by FINRA, its designated examining authority, for compliance with financial responsibility requirements. 12 Pursuant to the Regulatory Contract, both FINRA and the Exchange collect and maintain all alerts, complaints, investigations and enforcement actions in which NOS (in its capacity as a facility of BX routing orders to Phlx) is identified as a participant that has potentially violated applicable Commission or Exchange rules. The Exchange and FINRA retain these records in an easily accessible manner in order to facilitate any potential review conducted by the Commission’s Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations. the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and the Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:56 May 07, 2013 Jkt 229001 PO 00000 Frm 00081 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 26827 • Fourth, the Exchange has in place Phlx Rule 985(c), which requires The NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc., as the holding company owning both the Exchange and NOS, to establish and maintain procedures and internal controls reasonably designed to ensure that NOS does not develop or implement changes to its system, based on non-public information obtained regarding planned changes to the Exchange’s systems as a result of its affiliation with the Exchange, until such information is available generally to similarly situated Exchange members, in connection with the provision of inbound order routing to the Exchange. The Exchange has met all the abovelisted conditions. By meeting the above conditions, the Exchange has set up mechanisms that protect the independence of the Exchange’s regulatory responsibility with respect to NOS, as well as demonstrate that NOS cannot use any information advantage it may have because of its affiliation with the Exchange. Because the Exchange has met all the above-listed conditions, it now seeks permanent approval of this inbound routing relationship. The Exchange will continue to comply with the conditions 1–4 stated above. 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the provisions of Section 6 of the Act,13 in general, and with Sections 6(b)(5) of the Act,14 in particular, in that the proposal is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest, because the proposed rule change will allow the Exchange to continue to receive inbound orders from NOS, acting in its capacity as a facility of BX, in a manner consistent with prior approvals and established protections. The Exchange believes that these conditions establish mechanisms that protect the independence of the Exchange’s regulatory responsibility with respect to NOS, as well as ensure that NOS cannot use any information it 13 15 14 15 E:\FR\FM\08MYN1.SGM U.S.C. 78f. U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). 08MYN1 26828 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 89 / Wednesday, May 8, 2013 / Notices may have because of its affiliation with the Exchange to its advantage. B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended. Permanent approval of the current pilot program does not raise any issues of intra-market competition because it involves inbound routing from an affiliated exchange. Nor does it result in a burden on competition among exchanges, because there are many competing options exchanges that provide routing services, including through an affiliate. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others No written comments were either solicited or received. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action All submissions should refer to File Number SR–Phlx–2013–42. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing will also be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–Phlx– 2013–42 and should be submitted on or before May 29, 2013. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.15 Kevin M. O’Neill, Deputy Secretary. IV. Solicitation of Comments [FR Doc. 2013–10873 Filed 5–7–13; 8:45 am] Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: BILLING CODE 8011–01–P Electronic Comments mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which the Exchange consents, the Commission shall: (a) By order approve or disapprove such proposed rule change, or (b) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–Phlx–2013–42 on the subject line. Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated; Order Granting Approval of Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1, Relating to Trading Ahead of Customer Orders and Best Execution and Interpositioning Requirements Paper Comments May 2, 2013. • Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. I. Introduction On March 5, 2013, Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:56 May 07, 2013 Jkt 229001 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Release No. 34–69504; File No. SR–CBOE– 2013–027] 15 17 PO 00000 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). Frm 00082 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 (‘‘CBOE’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to adopt CBOE Rules 53.2 (Prohibition Against Trading Ahead of Customer Orders) and 53.8 (Best Execution and Interpositioning). The proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register on March 21, 2013.3 On April 12, 2013, CBOE filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change.4 The Commission did not receive any comments on the proposed rule change. This order approves the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1. II. Description of Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 53.2 of the CBSX Rules, which governs the treatment of customer orders and prohibits a CBSX Trading Permit Holder from proprietarily trading ahead of a customer order, and to adopt Rule 53.8 in the CBSX Rules to govern Trading Permit Holders’ best execution and interpositioning requirements. The Exchange represented that the proposed rule change is consistent with Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (‘‘FINRA’’) Rules 5320 (Prohibition Against Trading Ahead of Customer Orders) 5 and 5310 (Best Execution and Interpositioning),6 respectively, in the Consolidated FINRA Rulebook. 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). CFR 240.19b–4. 3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 69146 (March 15, 2013); 78 FR 17454 (‘‘Notice’’). 4 See Amendment No. 1 dated April 12, 2013. Amendment No. 1 corrected minor errors in the rule text of proposed Rules 53.2 and 53.8. Because Amendment No. 1 is technical in nature, it is not subject to notice and comment. 5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 63895 (February 11, 2011), 76 FR 9386 (February 17, 2011) (SR–FINRA–2009–090) (order approving FINRA Rule 5320, ‘‘Prohibition Against Trading Ahead of Customer Orders’’). Other exchanges have adopted substantially similar rules prohibiting trading ahead of customer orders. See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No. 64418 (May 6, 2011), 76 FR 27735 (May 12, 2011) (SR–CHX–2011–008) (notice of filing and immediate effectiveness of proposed rule change of Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc. to adopt customer order protection language consistent with FINRA Rule 5320); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 65165 (August 18, 2011), 76 FR 53009 (August 24, 2011) (SR–NYSEAmex–2011–059) (notice of filing and immediate effectiveness of proposed rule change of NYSE Amex LLC (now known as NYSE MKT LLC) to adopt customer order protection language that is substantially the same as FINRA Rule 5320); and Securities Exchange Act Release No. 65166 (August 18, 2011), 76 FR 53012 (August 24, 2011) (SR–NYSEArca–2011–057) (notice of filing and immediate effectiveness of proposed rule change of NYSE Arca, Inc. to adopt customer order protection language that is substantially the same as FINRA Rule 5320). 6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 65895 (December 5, 2011), 76 FR 77042 (December 9, 2 17 E:\FR\FM\08MYN1.SGM 08MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 89 (Wednesday, May 8, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26826-26828]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-10873]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-69498; File No. SR-Phlx-2013-42]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of 
Filing of Proposed Rule Change for the Permanent Approval of the 
Exchange's Pilot Program To Permit the Exchange To Accept Inbound 
Options Orders Routed by Nasdaq Options Services LLC From NASDAQ OMX 
BX, Inc.

May 2, 2013.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of 
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby 
given that, on April 23, 2013, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC (the ``Exchange'' or 
``Phlx'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the 
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II 
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory 
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit 
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C.78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes a rule change for the permanent approval of 
the Exchange's pilot program to permit the Exchange to accept inbound 
options orders routed by Nasdaq Options Services LLC (``NOS'') from 
NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc. (``BX'').

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for

[[Page 26827]]

the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the 
proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at 
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared 
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most 
significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    In conjunction with BX providing outbound routing services to all 
options markets using its affiliated routing broker, NOS,\4\ Phlx 
proposed that NOS be permitted to route orders from BX to Phlx on a 
pilot basis, subject to certain limitations and conditions, as 
described below.\5\ The current pilot program expires June 28, 2013.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67256 (June 26, 2012), 
77 FR 39277 (July 2, 2012) (SR-BX-2012-030).
    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67294 (June 28, 
2012), 77 FR 39771 (July 5, 2012) (SR-Phlx-2012-68).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    NOS is a broker-dealer and member of The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC 
(``NASDAQ''), PHLX and BX. NOS provides all routing functions for BX 
Options, Phlx, NASDAQ and NASDAQ Options Market (``NOM''). BX, NASDAQ, 
NOM, Phlx and NOS are affiliates.\6\ Accordingly, the affiliate 
relationship between Phlx and NOS, its member, raises the issue of an 
exchange's affiliation with a member of such exchange. Specifically, in 
connection with prior filings, the Commission has expressed concern 
that the affiliation of an exchange with one of its members raises the 
potential for unfair competitive advantage and potential conflicts of 
interest between an exchange's self-regulatory obligations and its 
commercial interests.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 58324 (August 7, 
2008), 73 FR 46936 (August 12, 2008) (SR-BSE-2008-02; SR-BSE-2008-
23; SR-BSE-2008-25; SR-BSECC-2008-01) (order approving NASDAQ OMX's 
acquisition of BX); and 58179 (July 17, 2008), 73 FR 42874 (July 23, 
2008) (SR-Phlx-2008-31) (order approving NASDAQ OMX's acquisition of 
Phlx).
    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 59153 (December 23, 
2008), 73 FR 80485 (December 31, 2008) (SR-NASDAQ-2008-098); and 
62736 (August 17, 2010), 75 FR 51861 (August 23, 2010) (SR-NASDAQ-
2010-100). See also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58135 (July 
10, 2008), 73 FR 40898 (July 16, 2008) (SR-NASDAQ-2008-061) 
(permitting NOS to be affiliated with Phlx).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Recognizing that the Commission has previously expressed concern 
regarding the potential for conflicts of interest in instances where a 
member firm is affiliated with an exchange of which it is a member, the 
Exchange previously proposed, and the Commission approved, limitations 
and conditions on NOS's affiliation with the Exchange.\8\ Also 
recognizing that the Commission has expressed concern regarding the 
potential for conflicts of interest in instances where a member firm is 
affiliated with an exchange to which it is routing orders, the Exchange 
previously proposed, and the Commission approved,\9\ NOS's affiliation 
with the Exchange to permit the Exchange to accept inbound orders that 
NOS routes in its capacity as a facility of BX, subject to the certain 
limitations and conditions. The Exchange now proposes to permit Phlx to 
accept inbound options orders that NOS routes in its capacity as a 
facility of BX on a permanent basis, subject to the limitations and 
conditions of this pilot:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59995 (May 28, 
2009), 74 FR 26750 (June 3, 2009) (SR-Phlx-2009-32).
    \9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67294 (June 28, 
2012), 77 FR 39771 (July 5, 2012) (SR-Phlx-2012-68).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     First, the Exchange and FINRA maintain a Regulatory 
Contract, as well as an agreement pursuant to Rule 17d-2 under the Act 
(``17d-2 Agreement'').\10\ Pursuant to the Regulatory Contract and the 
17d-2 Agreement, FINRA is allocated regulatory responsibilities to 
review NOS's compliance with certain Exchange rules.\11\ Pursuant to 
the Regulatory Contract, however, Phlx retains ultimate responsibility 
for enforcing its rules with respect to NOS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 17 CFR 240.17d-2.
    \11\ NOS is also subject to independent oversight by FINRA, its 
designated examining authority, for compliance with financial 
responsibility requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Second, FINRA monitors NOS for compliance with the 
Exchange's trading rules, and collects and maintains certain related 
information.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ Pursuant to the Regulatory Contract, both FINRA and the 
Exchange collect and maintain all alerts, complaints, investigations 
and enforcement actions in which NOS (in its capacity as a facility 
of BX routing orders to Phlx) is identified as a participant that 
has potentially violated applicable Commission or Exchange rules. 
The Exchange and FINRA retain these records in an easily accessible 
manner in order to facilitate any potential review conducted by the 
Commission's Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Third, FINRA provides a report to the Exchange's chief 
regulatory officer (``CRO''), on a quarterly basis, that: (i) 
Quantifies all alerts (of which FINRA is aware) that identify NOS as a 
participant that has potentially violated Commission or Exchange rules, 
and (ii) lists all investigations that identify NOS as a participant 
that has potentially violated Commission or Exchange rules.
     Fourth, the Exchange has in place Phlx Rule 985(c), which 
requires The NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc., as the holding company owning both 
the Exchange and NOS, to establish and maintain procedures and internal 
controls reasonably designed to ensure that NOS does not develop or 
implement changes to its system, based on non-public information 
obtained regarding planned changes to the Exchange's systems as a 
result of its affiliation with the Exchange, until such information is 
available generally to similarly situated Exchange members, in 
connection with the provision of inbound order routing to the Exchange.
    The Exchange has met all the above-listed conditions. By meeting 
the above conditions, the Exchange has set up mechanisms that protect 
the independence of the Exchange's regulatory responsibility with 
respect to NOS, as well as demonstrate that NOS cannot use any 
information advantage it may have because of its affiliation with the 
Exchange. Because the Exchange has met all the above-listed conditions, 
it now seeks permanent approval of this inbound routing relationship. 
The Exchange will continue to comply with the conditions 1-4 stated 
above.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent 
with the provisions of Section 6 of the Act,\13\ in general, and with 
Sections 6(b)(5) of the Act,\14\ in particular, in that the proposal is 
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to 
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation 
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, 
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating 
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the 
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, 
in general, to protect investors and the public interest, because the 
proposed rule change will allow the Exchange to continue to receive 
inbound orders from NOS, acting in its capacity as a facility of BX, in 
a manner consistent with prior approvals and established protections. 
The Exchange believes that these conditions establish mechanisms that 
protect the independence of the Exchange's regulatory responsibility 
with respect to NOS, as well as ensure that NOS cannot use any 
information it

[[Page 26828]]

may have because of its affiliation with the Exchange to its advantage.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or 
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended. 
Permanent approval of the current pilot program does not raise any 
issues of intra-market competition because it involves inbound routing 
from an affiliated exchange. Nor does it result in a burden on 
competition among exchanges, because there are many competing options 
exchanges that provide routing services, including through an 
affiliate.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the 
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may 
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to 
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to 
which the Exchange consents, the Commission shall: (a) By order approve 
or disapprove such proposed rule change, or (b) institute proceedings 
to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include 
File Number SR-Phlx-2013-42 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy, 
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2013-42. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and 
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing will also be available for 
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All 
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does 
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should 
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All 
submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2013-42 and should be 
submitted on or before May 29, 2013.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-10873 Filed 5-7-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.