Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Advance Notification of Sunset Reviews, 25422-25423 [2013-10285]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
25422
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 84 / Wednesday, May 1, 2013 / Notices
7 If one of the above-named companies does not qualify for a separate rate, all other exporters of Glycine from the PRC who have not qualified
for a separate rate are deemed to be covered by this review as part of the single PRC entity of which the named exporters are a part.
8 If one of the above-named companies does not qualify for a separate rate, all other exporters of Tissue Paper Products from the PRC who
have not qualified for a separate rate are deemed to be covered by this review as part of the single PRC entity of which the named exporters are
a part.
9 In the initiation notice covering cases with December anniversary dates, the Department inadvertently included Tata Steel Limited in the initiation of the review of the countervailing duty order on Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from India. See Initiation of Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Request for Revocation in Part, 78 FR 6291 (January 30, 2012). We are not initiating a review with respect to Tata Steel Limited. This is a correction to the January 30, 2012, initiation notice.
Suspension Agreements
None.
During any administrative review
covering all or part of a period falling
between the first and second or third
and fourth anniversary of the
publication of an antidumping duty
order under 19 CFR 351.211 or a
determination under 19 CFR
351.218(f)(4) to continue an order or
suspended investigation (after sunset
review), the Secretary, if requested by a
domestic interested party within 30
days of the date of publication of the
notice of initiation of the review, will
determine, consistent with FAG Italia v.
United States, 291 F.3d 806 (Fed Cir.
2002), as appropriate, whether
antidumping duties have been absorbed
by an exporter or producer subject to the
review if the subject merchandise is
sold in the United States through an
importer that is affiliated with such
exporter or producer. The request must
include the name(s) of the exporter or
producer for which the inquiry is
requested.
For the first administrative review of
any order, there will be no assessment
of antidumping or countervailing duties
on entries of subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption during the relevant
provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period, of
the order, if such a gap period is
applicable to the POR.
Interested parties must submit
applications for disclosure under
administrative protective orders in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. On
January 22, 2008, the Department
published Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Documents Submission Procedures;
APO Procedures, 73 FR 3634 (January
22, 2008). Those procedures apply to
administrative reviews included in this
notice of initiation. Parties wishing to
participate in any of these
administrative reviews should ensure
that the meet the requirements of these
procedures (e.g., the filing of separate
letters of appearance as discussed at 19
CFR 351.103(d)).
Any party submitting factual
information in an antidumping duty or
countervailing duty proceeding must
certify to the accuracy and completeness
of that information. See section 782(b)
of the Act. Parties are hereby reminded
that revised certification requirements
are in effect for company/government
officials as well as their representatives
in all segments of any antidumping duty
or countervailing duty proceedings
initiated on or after March 14, 2011. See
Certification of Factual Information to
Import Administration During
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Interim Final Rule, 76 FR
7491 (February 10, 2011) (‘‘Interim Final
Rule’’), amending 19 CFR 351.303(g)(1)
and (2). The formats for the revised
certifications are provided at the end of
the Interim Final Rule. The Department
intends to reject factual submissions in
any proceeding segments initiated on or
after March 14, 2011 if the submitting
party does not comply with the revised
certification requirements.
These initiations and this notice are
in accordance with section 751(a) of the
Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)) and 19 CFR
351.221(c)(1)(i).
Dated: April 25, 2013.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2013–10299 Filed 4–30–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation; Advance Notification of
Sunset Reviews
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
Background
Every five years, pursuant to section
751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (‘‘the Act’’), the Department of
Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) and the
International Trade Commission
automatically initiate and conduct a
review to determine whether revocation
of a countervailing or antidumping duty
order or termination of an investigation
suspended under section 704 or 734 of
the Act would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of dumping
or a countervailable subsidy (as the case
may be) and of material injury.
Upcoming Sunset Reviews for June
2013
The following Sunset Reviews are
scheduled for initiation in June 2013
and will appear in that month’s Notice
of Initiation of Five-Year Sunset Review.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Department contact
Antidumping Duty Proceedings
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Brazil (A–351–832) (2nd Review) ........................................
Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe from the People’s Republic of China (A–570–910) (1st Review).
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Indonesia (A–560–815) (2nd Review) .................................
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Mexico (A–201–830) (2nd Review) ......................................
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Moldova (A–841–805) (2nd Review) ...................................
Silicon Metal from Russia (A–821–817) (2nd Review) ....................................................................................
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Trinidad and Tobago (A–274–804) (2nd Review) ...............
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Ukraine (A–823–812) (2nd Review) .....................................
Countervailing Duty Proceedings
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Brazil (C–351–833) (2nd Review) ........................................
Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe from the People’s Republic of China (C–570–911) (1st Review).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:21 Apr 30, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\01MYN1.SGM
Jennifer Moats (202) 482–5047.
Jennifer Moats (202) 482–5047.
Jennifer Moats (202) 482–5047.
Jennifer Moats (202) 482–5047.
Jennifer Moats (202) 482–5047.
Dana Mermelstein (202) 482–1391.
Jennifer Moats (202) 482–5047.
Jennifer Moats (202) 482–5047.
Jennifer Moats (202) 482–5047.
David Goldberger (202) 482–4136.
01MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 84 / Wednesday, May 1, 2013 / Notices
25423
Department contact
Suspended Investigations
No Sunset Review of suspended investigations is scheduled for initiation in June 2013.
The Department’s procedures for the
conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth
in 19 CFR 351.218. Guidance on
methodological or analytical issues
relevant to the Department’s conduct of
Sunset Reviews is set forth in the
Department’s Policy Bulletin 98.3—
Policies Regarding the Conduct of Fiveyear (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Orders; Policy Bulletin, 63 FR 18871
(April 16, 1998). The Notice of Initiation
of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews
provides further information regarding
what is required of all parties to
participate in Sunset Reviews.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(c), the
Department will maintain and make
available a service list for these
proceedings. To facilitate the timely
preparation of the service list(s), it is
requested that those seeking recognition
as interested parties to a proceeding
contact the Department in writing
within 10 days of the publication of the
Notice of Initiation.
Please note that if the Department
receives a Notice of Intent to Participate
from a member of the domestic industry
within 15 days of the date of initiation,
the review will continue. Thereafter,
any interested party wishing to
participate in the Sunset Review must
provide substantive comments in
response to the notice of initiation no
later than 30 days after the date of
initiation.
This notice is not required by statute
but is published as a service to the
international trading community.
Dated: April 17, 2013.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2013–10285 Filed 4–30–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
International Trade Administration
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation; Opportunity To Request
Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD
Operations, Customs Unit, Import
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:21 Apr 30, 2013
Jkt 229001
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230,
telephone: (202) 482–4735.
Background
Each year during the anniversary
month of the publication of an
antidumping or countervailing duty
order, finding, or suspended
investigation, an interested party, as
defined in section 771(9) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’),
may request, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.213, that the Department of
Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) conduct
an administrative review of that
antidumping or countervailing duty
order, finding, or suspended
investigation.
All deadlines for the submission of
comments or actions by the Department
discussed below refer to the number of
calendar days from the applicable
starting date.
Respondent Selection
In the event the Department limits the
number of respondents for individual
examination for administrative reviews
initiated pursuant to requests made for
the orders identified below, the
Department intends to select
respondents based on U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) data for U.S.
imports during the period of review. We
intend to release the CBP data under
Administrative Protective Order
(‘‘APO’’) to all parties having an APO
within five days of publication of the
initiation notice and to make our
decision regarding respondent selection
within 21 days of publication of the
initiation Federal Register notice.
Therefore, we encourage all parties
interested in commenting on respondent
selection to submit their APO
applications on the date of publication
of the initiation notice, or as soon
thereafter as possible. The Department
invites comments regarding the CBP
data and respondent selection within
five days of placement of the CBP data
on the record of the review.
In the event the Department decides
it is necessary to limit individual
examination of respondents and
conduct respondent selection under
section 777A(c)(2) of the Act:
In general, the Department has found
that determinations concerning whether
particular companies should be
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
‘‘collapsed’’ (i.e., treated as a single
entity for purposes of calculating
antidumping duty rates) require a
substantial amount of detailed
information and analysis, which often
require follow-up questions and
analysis. Accordingly, the Department
will not conduct collapsing analyses at
the respondent selection phase of this
review and will not collapse companies
at the respondent selection phase unless
there has been a determination to
collapse certain companies in a
previous segment of this antidumping
proceeding (i.e., investigation,
administrative review, new shipper
review or changed circumstances
review). For any company subject to this
review, if the Department determined,
or continued to treat, that company as
collapsed with others, the Department
will assume that such companies
continue to operate in the same manner
and will collapse them for respondent
selection purposes. Otherwise, the
Department will not collapse companies
for purposes of respondent selection.
Parties are requested to (a) identify
which companies subject to review
previously were collapsed, and (b)
provide a citation to the proceeding in
which they were collapsed. Further, if
companies are requested to complete
the Quantity and Value Questionnaire
for purposes of respondent selection, in
general each company must report
volume and value data separately for
itself. Parties should not include data
for any other party, even if they believe
they should be treated as a single entity
with that other party. If a company was
collapsed with another company or
companies in the most recently
completed segment of this proceeding
where the Department considered
collapsing that entity, complete quantity
and value data for that collapsed entity
must be submitted.
Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for
Administrative Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a
party that has requested a review may
withdraw that request within 90 days of
the date of publication of the notice of
initiation of the requested review. The
regulation provides that the Department
may extend this time if it is reasonable
to do so. In order to provide parties
additional certainty with respect to
when the Department will exercise its
discretion to extend this 90-day
E:\FR\FM\01MYN1.SGM
01MYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 84 (Wednesday, May 1, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25422-25423]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-10285]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation; Advance Notification of Sunset Reviews
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
Background
Every five years, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (``the Act''), the Department of Commerce (``the
Department'') and the International Trade Commission automatically
initiate and conduct a review to determine whether revocation of a
countervailing or antidumping duty order or termination of an
investigation suspended under section 704 or 734 of the Act would be
likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping or a
countervailable subsidy (as the case may be) and of material injury.
Upcoming Sunset Reviews for June 2013
The following Sunset Reviews are scheduled for initiation in June
2013 and will appear in that month's Notice of Initiation of Five-Year
Sunset Review.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Department contact
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Antidumping Duty Proceedings
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Jennifer Moats (202)
Brazil (A-351-832) (2nd Review). 482-5047.
Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe from Jennifer Moats (202)
the People's Republic of China (A-570-910) (1st 482-5047.
Review).
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Jennifer Moats (202)
Indonesia (A-560-815) (2nd Review). 482-5047.
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Jennifer Moats (202)
Mexico (A-201-830) (2nd Review). 482-5047.
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Jennifer Moats (202)
Moldova (A-841-805) (2nd Review). 482-5047.
Silicon Metal from Russia (A-821-817) (2nd Dana Mermelstein (202)
Review). 482-1391.
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Jennifer Moats (202)
Trinidad and Tobago (A-274-804) (2nd Review). 482-5047.
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Jennifer Moats (202)
Ukraine (A-823-812) (2nd Review). 482-5047.
Countervailing Duty Proceedings
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Jennifer Moats (202)
Brazil (C-351-833) (2nd Review). 482-5047.
Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe from David Goldberger (202)
the People's Republic of China (C-570-911) (1st 482-4136.
Review).
[[Page 25423]]
Suspended Investigations
No Sunset Review of suspended investigations is ......................
scheduled for initiation in June 2013.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department's procedures for the conduct of Sunset Reviews are
set forth in 19 CFR 351.218. Guidance on methodological or analytical
issues relevant to the Department's conduct of Sunset Reviews is set
forth in the Department's Policy Bulletin 98.3--Policies Regarding the
Conduct of Five-year (``Sunset'') Reviews of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Orders; Policy Bulletin, 63 FR 18871 (April 16,
1998). The Notice of Initiation of Five-Year (``Sunset'') Reviews
provides further information regarding what is required of all parties
to participate in Sunset Reviews.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(c), the Department will maintain and
make available a service list for these proceedings. To facilitate the
timely preparation of the service list(s), it is requested that those
seeking recognition as interested parties to a proceeding contact the
Department in writing within 10 days of the publication of the Notice
of Initiation.
Please note that if the Department receives a Notice of Intent to
Participate from a member of the domestic industry within 15 days of
the date of initiation, the review will continue. Thereafter, any
interested party wishing to participate in the Sunset Review must
provide substantive comments in response to the notice of initiation no
later than 30 days after the date of initiation.
This notice is not required by statute but is published as a
service to the international trading community.
Dated: April 17, 2013.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2013-10285 Filed 4-30-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
