Certain Steel Nails From the People's Republic of China: Amended Final Results of the Third Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2010-2011, 24721-24723 [2013-09919]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 81 / Friday, April 26, 2013 / Notices proposed action. Comments received in response to this notice, including the names and addresses of those who comment, will be a part of the project record and available for public review. Early Notice of Importance of Public Participation in Subsequent Environmental Review: A Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) will be prepared for comment. The next major opportunity for public input will be when the DEIS is published. The comment period for the DEIS will be 45 days from the date the Environmental Protection Agency publishes the notice of availability in the Federal Register. The Draft EIS is anticipated to be available for public review in February 2014. Dated: April 15, 2013. Rick Brazell, Forest Supervisor. [FR Doc. 2013–09710 Filed 4–25–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–11–P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Rural Housing Service Notice of Request for Extension of a Currently Approved Information Collection The Rural Housing Service, USDA. ACTION: Proposed collection; Comments requested. AGENCY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this notice announces the Rural Housing Service’s intention to request an extension for a currently approved information collection in support of the program for ‘‘Section 515 Multi-Family Housing Preservation and Revitalization Restructuring Demonstration Program (MPR) for Fiscal Year 2006.’’ DATES: Comments on this notice must be received by June 25, 2013 to be assured of consideration. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melinda Price, Finance and Housing Analyst, Multi-Family Housing and Preservation and Direct Loan Division, Federal Building, 200 North High Street, Room 597, Columbia, Ohio 43215, (614) 255–2403 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title: Section 515 Multi-Family Housing Preservation and Revitalization Restructuring (MPR) Demonstration Program. OMB Number: 0575–0190. Expiration Date of Approval: July 31, 2013. erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:39 Apr 25, 2013 Jkt 229001 Type of Request: Extension of currently approved information collection. Abstract: The Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriation Act, 2006 (Pub. L. 109– 97) provides funding for, and authorizes Rural Development to conduct a demonstration program for the preservation and revitalization of the Section 515 Multi-Family Housing portfolio. Section 515 of the Housing Act of 1949 (42 U.S.C. 1485) provides Rural Development the authority to make loans for low-income MultiFamily Housing and related facilities. Rural Development refers to this program as Multi-Family Housing Preservation and Revitalization Restructuring Program (MPR). A NOFA sets forth the eligibility and application requirements. Information will be collected from applicants and grant recipients by Rural Development staff in its Local, Area, State, and National offices. This information will be used to determine applicant eligibility for this demonstration program. If an applicant proposal is selected, that applicant will be notified of the selection and given the opportunity to submit a formal application. Estimate of Burden: Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response. Respondents: Individuals, partnerships, public and private nonprofit corporations, agencies, institutions, organizations, and Indian tribes. Estimated Number of Respondents: 1,500. Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 1. Estimated Number of Responses: 2,420. Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 2,720. Copies of this information collection can be obtained from Jeanne Jacobs, Regulations and Paperwork Management Branch, Support Services Division at (202) 692–0040. Comments: Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of Rural Development, including whether the information will have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of Rural Development’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 24721 collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Comments may be sent to Jeanne Jacobs, Regulations and Paperwork Management Branch, Support Services Division, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Support Services Division, STOP 0742, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20250. All responses to this notice will be summarized and included in the request for OMB approval. All comments will become a matter of public record. Dated: April 17, 2013. ˜ Tammye Trevino, Administrator, Rural Housing Service. [FR Doc. 2013–09894 Filed 4–25–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–909] Certain Steel Nails From the People’s Republic of China: Amended Final Results of the Third Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2010–2011 Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. DATES: Effective Date: April 26, 2013. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Javier Barrientos, AD/CVD Operations, Office 9, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2243. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background On March 18, 2013, the Department of Commerce (‘‘Department’’) published the final results of the third administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain steel nails from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’).1 On March 13, 2013, Hongli et al.2 filed timely allegations 1 See Certain Steel Nails From the People’s Republic of China; Final Results of Third Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2010– 2011, 78 FR 16651 (March 18, 2013), and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum (‘‘Final Results’’). 2 Itochu Building Products Co., Inc., Tianjin Jinghai County Hongli Industry & Business Co., Ltd. (‘‘Hongli’’), Certified Products International Inc. (‘‘CPI’’), China Staple Enterprise (Tianjin) Co., Ltd. (‘‘China Staple’’), Chiieh Yung Metal Ind. Corp., E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM Continued 26APN1 24722 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 81 / Friday, April 26, 2013 / Notices that the Department made ministerial errors in the Final Results and requested, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224, that the Department correct the alleged ministerial errors. No other party in this proceeding submitted comments on the Department’s final margin calculations. Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by the order includes certain steel nails having a shaft length up to 12 inches. Certain steel nails subject to the order are currently classified under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) subheadings 7317.00.55, 7317.00.65 and 7317.00.75. While the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of the order is dispositive.3 For a full description of the scope, see Ministerial Error Memorandum 4 at page 2. Amended Final Results of the Review The Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘Act’’), defines a ‘‘ministerial error’’ as including ‘‘errors in addition, subtraction, or other arithmetic function, clerical errors resulting from inaccurate copying, duplication, or the like, and any other type of unintentional error which the administering authority considers ministerial.’’ 5 As explained in the Ministerial Error Memorandum accompanying this notice, in accordance with section 751(h) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.224(e), we have determined that we made a ministerial error in the calculation of Hongli’s Final Results margin calculation with regard to the classification of certain surrogate financial data. We note that correcting this error changes the weighted-average margins for Hongli, as well as the separate rate companies from the Final Results. In addition, the Final Results inadvertently reported a separate rate margin for CPI and China Staple, although we rescinded the review of these two companies.6 For a detailed discussion of these ministerial errors, as well as the Department’s analysis of the allegations of ministerial errors, see the Ministerial Error Memorandum. As discussed in the Ministerial Error Memorandum, the review is rescinded for CPI and China Staple. Disclosure We will disclose the calculations performed for these amended final results within five days of the date of publication of this notice to interested parties in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Amended Final Results of the Review The weighted-average dumping margins for the period of review (‘‘POR’’) are as follows: Weighted average margin (percent) Manufacturer/exporter (1) Tianjin Jinghai County Hongli Industry & Business Co., Ltd ................................................................................................. (2) Cana (Tianjin) Hardware Industrial Co., Ltd .......................................................................................................................... (3) Shanghai Curvet Hardware Products Co., Ltd ...................................................................................................................... (4) Huanghua Jinhai Hardware Products Co., Ltd ...................................................................................................................... (5) Shanxi Tianli Industries Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................................ (6) Shanghai Jade Shuttle Hardware Tools Co., Ltd .................................................................................................................. (7) Shandong Dinglong Import & Export Co., Ltd ....................................................................................................................... (8) Tianjin Jinchi Metal Products Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................... (9) Huanghua Xionghua Hardware Products Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................ (10) Tianjin Zhonglian Metals Ware Co., Ltd .............................................................................................................................. (11) Shanghai Yueda Nails Industry Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................. (12) Hebie Cangzhou New Century Foreign Trade Co., Ltd ...................................................................................................... (13) Zhaoqing Harvest Nails Co., Ltd .......................................................................................................................................... (14) Mingguan Abundant Hardware Products Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................... (15) Nanjing Yuechang Hardware Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................. (16) S-Mart (Tianjin) Technology Development Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................ (17) SDC International Australia Pty., Ltd ................................................................................................................................... (18) Shanxi Hairui Trade Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................................... (19) Guangdong Foreign Trade Import & Export Corporation .................................................................................................... (20) Qingdao D&L Group Ltd ...................................................................................................................................................... PRC-Wide Rate7 .......................................................................................................................................................................... 33.25 33.25 33.25 33.25 33.25 33.25 33.25 33.25 33.25 33.25 33.25 33.25 33.25 33.25 33.25 33.25 33.25 33.25 33.25 33.25 118.04 erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Those companies not eligible for a separate rate will be considered part of the PRC-wide entity. Assessment Rates The Department will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review. The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication date of these amended final results of this review. However, on April 9, 2013, the U.S. Court of International Trade issued a preliminary injunction enjoining CYM (Nanjing) Nail Manufacture Co., Ltd., Qidong Liang Chyuan Metal Industry Co., Ltd. (‘‘Qidong Liang Chyuan’’) and Hengshui Mingyao Hardware & Mesh Products Co., Ltd. (‘‘Hengshui Mingyao’’) (collectively Hongli et al.). 3 See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Steel Nails From the People’s Republic of China, 73 FR 44961 (August 1, 2008). 4 See Memorandum to Gary Taverman, from James C. Doyle, regarding ‘‘Third Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Certain Steel Nails from the People’s Republic of China: Ministerial Error Allegations Memorandum,’’ dated concurrently with this notice (‘‘Ministerial Error Memorandum’’). This memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Import Administration’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (‘‘IA ACCESS’’). Access to IA ACCESS is available to registered users at http://iaaccess.trade.gove and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Ministerial Error Memorandum is available on the web at http://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn/index.html. The signed Ministerial Error Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Ministerial Error Memorandum are identical in content. 5 See section 751(h) of the Act; see also 19 CFR 351.224(e). 6 The Department notes that it rescinded the review for the following companies in the final results: (1) Jining Huarong Hardware Products Co., Ltd.; (2) Chiieh Yung Metal Ind. Corp.; (3) CYM (Nanjing) Nail Manufacture Co., Ltd.; (4) Qidong Liang Chyuan; (5) CPI; (6) Besco Machinery Industry (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd.; (7) China Staple; (8) Zhejiang Gem-Chun Hardware Accessory Co., Ltd.; (9) PT Enterprise Inc.; (10) Shanxi Yuci Broad Wire Products Co., Ltd.; (11) Hengshui Mingyao; and (12) Union Enterprise (Kunshan) Co., Ltd. (collectively ‘‘No Shipment Respondents’’). See Final Results, 78 FR at 16652. 7 See Final Results, 78 FR at 16652–16653. VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:46 Apr 25, 2013 Jkt 229001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM 26APN1 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 81 / Friday, April 26, 2013 / Notices erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES liquidation of certain entries during the POR which are subject to the antidumping duty order on certain steel nails from the PRC.8 Accordingly, the Department will not issue assessment instructions to CBP for any entries subject to the above-mentioned injunction after publication of this notice. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we are calculating importer- (or customer-) specific assessment rates for the merchandise subject to this review. In these Final Results, the Department applied the assessment rate calculation method adopted in Final Modification for Reviews, i.e., on the basis of monthly average-to-average comparisons using only the transactions associated with that importer with offsets being provided for non-dumped comparisons.9 Where the respondent has reported reliable entered values, we calculate importer- (or customer-) specific ad valorem rates by aggregating the dumping margins calculated for all U.S. sales to each importer (or customer) and dividing this amount by the total entered value of the sales to each importer (or customer). Where an importer- (or customer-) specific ad valorem rate is greater than de minimis, we will apply the assessment rate to the entered value of the importers’/ customers’ entries during the POR, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Where we do not have entered values for all U.S. sales to a particular importer/customer, we calculate a perunit assessment rate by aggregating the antidumping duties due for all U.S. sales to that importer (or customer) and dividing this amount by the total quantity sold to that importer (or customer).10 To determine whether the duty assessment rates are de minimis, in accordance with the requirement set forth in 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we calculated importer- (or customer-) specific ad valorem ratios based on the estimated entered value. Where an importer- (or customer-) specific ad valorem rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.11 For the companies receiving a separate rate that were not selected for 8 See Itochu Building Products Co., Inc., et al. v. United States, CIT Court No. 13–00132 dated April 9, 2013. 9 See Antidumping Proceeding: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8103 (February 14, 2012) (‘‘Final Modification for Reviews’’). 10 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 11 See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:46 Apr 25, 2013 Jkt 229001 individual review, we will assign an assessment rate based on the rate we calculated for the mandatory respondent whose rate was not de minimis, as discussed above. We intend to instruct CBP to liquidate entries containing subject merchandise exported by the PRC-wide entity at the PRC-wide rate. Finally, for those companies for which this review has been rescinded, the Department intends to assess antidumping duties at rates equal to the cash deposit of estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(2). Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the amended final results of this administrative review for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the exporters listed above, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established in the amended final results of review (except, if the rate is zero or de minimis, i.e., less than 0.5 percent, a zero cash deposit rate will be required for that company); (2) for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and nonPRC exporters not listed above that have a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the PRCwide rate of 118.04 percent; and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporters that supplied that non-PRC exporter. The deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties has occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 24723 Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. We are issuing and publishing this administrative review and notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act. Dated: April 17, 2013. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. 2013–09919 Filed 4–25–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–848] Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat From the People’s Republic of China: Initiation of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. DATES: Effective Date: April 26, 2013. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Department) has determined that a request for a new shipper review (NSR) of the antidumping duty order on freshwater crawfish tail meat from the People’s Republic of China (PRC), meets the statutory and regulatory requirements for initiation. The period of review (POR) for this NSR is September 1, 2012, through February 28, 2013. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dmitry Vladimirov, AD/CVD Operations, Office 1, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; Telephone: 202–482–0665. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background The antidumping duty order on freshwater crawfish tail meat from the E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM 26APN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 81 (Friday, April 26, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24721-24723]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-09919]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-909]


Certain Steel Nails From the People's Republic of China: Amended 
Final Results of the Third Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 
2010-2011

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

DATES: Effective Date: April 26, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Javier Barrientos, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office 9, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2243.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On March 18, 2013, the Department of Commerce (``Department'') 
published the final results of the third administrative review of the 
antidumping duty order on certain steel nails from the People's 
Republic of China (``PRC'').\1\ On March 13, 2013, Hongli et al.\2\ 
filed timely allegations

[[Page 24722]]

that the Department made ministerial errors in the Final Results and 
requested, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224, that the Department correct the 
alleged ministerial errors. No other party in this proceeding submitted 
comments on the Department's final margin calculations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Certain Steel Nails From the People's Republic of China; 
Final Results of Third Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2010-
2011, 78 FR 16651 (March 18, 2013), and accompanying Issues and 
Decision Memorandum (``Final Results'').
    \2\ Itochu Building Products Co., Inc., Tianjin Jinghai County 
Hongli Industry & Business Co., Ltd. (``Hongli''), Certified 
Products International Inc. (``CPI''), China Staple Enterprise 
(Tianjin) Co., Ltd. (``China Staple''), Chiieh Yung Metal Ind. 
Corp., CYM (Nanjing) Nail Manufacture Co., Ltd., Qidong Liang Chyuan 
Metal Industry Co., Ltd. (``Qidong Liang Chyuan'') and Hengshui 
Mingyao Hardware & Mesh Products Co., Ltd. (``Hengshui Mingyao'') 
(collectively Hongli et al.).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise covered by the order includes certain steel nails 
having a shaft length up to 12 inches. Certain steel nails subject to 
the order are currently classified under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule 
of the United States (``HTSUS'') subheadings 7317.00.55, 7317.00.65 and 
7317.00.75. While the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience 
and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of the order 
is dispositive.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Steel Nails 
From the People's Republic of China, 73 FR 44961 (August 1, 2008).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For a full description of the scope, see Ministerial Error 
Memorandum \4\ at page 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Memorandum to Gary Taverman, from James C. Doyle, 
regarding ``Third Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Certain 
Steel Nails from the People's Republic of China: Ministerial Error 
Allegations Memorandum,'' dated concurrently with this notice 
(``Ministerial Error Memorandum''). This memorandum is a public 
document and is on file electronically via Import Administration's 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service 
System (``IA ACCESS''). Access to IA ACCESS is available to 
registered users at http://iaaccess.trade.gove and is available to 
all parties in the Central Records Unit, room 7046 of the main 
Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of 
the Ministerial Error Memorandum is available on the web at http://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn/index.html. The signed Ministerial Error 
Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Ministerial Error 
Memorandum are identical in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amended Final Results of the Review

    The Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``Act''), defines a 
``ministerial error'' as including ``errors in addition, subtraction, 
or other arithmetic function, clerical errors resulting from inaccurate 
copying, duplication, or the like, and any other type of unintentional 
error which the administering authority considers ministerial.'' \5\ As 
explained in the Ministerial Error Memorandum accompanying this notice, 
in accordance with section 751(h) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.224(e), we 
have determined that we made a ministerial error in the calculation of 
Hongli's Final Results margin calculation with regard to the 
classification of certain surrogate financial data. We note that 
correcting this error changes the weighted-average margins for Hongli, 
as well as the separate rate companies from the Final Results. In 
addition, the Final Results inadvertently reported a separate rate 
margin for CPI and China Staple, although we rescinded the review of 
these two companies.\6\ For a detailed discussion of these ministerial 
errors, as well as the Department's analysis of the allegations of 
ministerial errors, see the Ministerial Error Memorandum. As discussed 
in the Ministerial Error Memorandum, the review is rescinded for CPI 
and China Staple.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See section 751(h) of the Act; see also 19 CFR 351.224(e).
    \6\ The Department notes that it rescinded the review for the 
following companies in the final results: (1) Jining Huarong 
Hardware Products Co., Ltd.; (2) Chiieh Yung Metal Ind. Corp.; (3) 
CYM (Nanjing) Nail Manufacture Co., Ltd.; (4) Qidong Liang Chyuan; 
(5) CPI; (6) Besco Machinery Industry (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd.; (7) 
China Staple; (8) Zhejiang Gem-Chun Hardware Accessory Co., Ltd.; 
(9) PT Enterprise Inc.; (10) Shanxi Yuci Broad Wire Products Co., 
Ltd.; (11) Hengshui Mingyao; and (12) Union Enterprise (Kunshan) 
Co., Ltd. (collectively ``No Shipment Respondents''). See Final 
Results, 78 FR at 16652.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure

    We will disclose the calculations performed for these amended final 
results within five days of the date of publication of this notice to 
interested parties in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).

Amended Final Results of the Review

    The weighted-average dumping margins for the period of review 
(``POR'') are as follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       Weighted average
                Manufacturer/exporter                  margin (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Tianjin Jinghai County Hongli Industry &                       33.25
 Business Co., Ltd..................................
(2) Cana (Tianjin) Hardware Industrial Co., Ltd.....               33.25
(3) Shanghai Curvet Hardware Products Co., Ltd......               33.25
(4) Huanghua Jinhai Hardware Products Co., Ltd......               33.25
(5) Shanxi Tianli Industries Co., Ltd...............               33.25
(6) Shanghai Jade Shuttle Hardware Tools Co., Ltd...               33.25
(7) Shandong Dinglong Import & Export Co., Ltd......               33.25
(8) Tianjin Jinchi Metal Products Co., Ltd..........               33.25
(9) Huanghua Xionghua Hardware Products Co., Ltd....               33.25
(10) Tianjin Zhonglian Metals Ware Co., Ltd.........               33.25
(11) Shanghai Yueda Nails Industry Co., Ltd.........               33.25
(12) Hebie Cangzhou New Century Foreign Trade Co.,                 33.25
 Ltd................................................
(13) Zhaoqing Harvest Nails Co., Ltd................               33.25
(14) Mingguan Abundant Hardware Products Co., Ltd...               33.25
(15) Nanjing Yuechang Hardware Co., Ltd.............               33.25
(16) S-Mart (Tianjin) Technology Development Co.,                  33.25
 Ltd................................................
(17) SDC International Australia Pty., Ltd..........               33.25
(18) Shanxi Hairui Trade Co., Ltd...................               33.25
(19) Guangdong Foreign Trade Import & Export                       33.25
 Corporation........................................
(20) Qingdao D&L Group Ltd..........................               33.25
PRC-Wide Rate\7\....................................              118.04
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Those companies not eligible for a separate rate will be considered 
part of the PRC-wide entity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Final Results, 78 FR at 16652-16653.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment Rates

    The Department will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (``CBP'') shall assess, antidumping duties on all 
appropriate entries covered by this review. The Department intends to 
issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication date 
of these amended final results of this review. However, on April 9, 
2013, the U.S. Court of International Trade issued a preliminary 
injunction enjoining

[[Page 24723]]

liquidation of certain entries during the POR which are subject to the 
antidumping duty order on certain steel nails from the PRC.\8\ 
Accordingly, the Department will not issue assessment instructions to 
CBP for any entries subject to the above-mentioned injunction after 
publication of this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Itochu Building Products Co., Inc., et al. v. United 
States, CIT Court No. 13-00132 dated April 9, 2013.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we are calculating 
importer- (or customer-) specific assessment rates for the merchandise 
subject to this review. In these Final Results, the Department applied 
the assessment rate calculation method adopted in Final Modification 
for Reviews, i.e., on the basis of monthly average-to-average 
comparisons using only the transactions associated with that importer 
with offsets being provided for non-dumped comparisons.\9\ Where the 
respondent has reported reliable entered values, we calculate importer- 
(or customer-) specific ad valorem rates by aggregating the dumping 
margins calculated for all U.S. sales to each importer (or customer) 
and dividing this amount by the total entered value of the sales to 
each importer (or customer). Where an importer- (or customer-) specific 
ad valorem rate is greater than de minimis, we will apply the 
assessment rate to the entered value of the importers'/customers' 
entries during the POR, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Antidumping Proceeding: Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 
Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8103 (February 14, 2012) 
(``Final Modification for Reviews'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Where we do not have entered values for all U.S. sales to a 
particular importer/customer, we calculate a per-unit assessment rate 
by aggregating the antidumping duties due for all U.S. sales to that 
importer (or customer) and dividing this amount by the total quantity 
sold to that importer (or customer).\10\ To determine whether the duty 
assessment rates are de minimis, in accordance with the requirement set 
forth in 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we calculated importer- (or customer-) 
specific ad valorem ratios based on the estimated entered value. Where 
an importer- (or customer-) specific ad valorem rate is zero or de 
minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate entries without 
regard to antidumping duties.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
    \11\ See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For the companies receiving a separate rate that were not selected 
for individual review, we will assign an assessment rate based on the 
rate we calculated for the mandatory respondent whose rate was not de 
minimis, as discussed above. We intend to instruct CBP to liquidate 
entries containing subject merchandise exported by the PRC-wide entity 
at the PRC-wide rate. Finally, for those companies for which this 
review has been rescinded, the Department intends to assess antidumping 
duties at rates equal to the cash deposit of estimated antidumping 
duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for 
consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(2).

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the amended final results of this administrative review 
for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as 
provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the exporters 
listed above, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established in the 
amended final results of review (except, if the rate is zero or de 
minimis, i.e., less than 0.5 percent, a zero cash deposit rate will be 
required for that company); (2) for previously investigated or reviewed 
PRC and non-PRC exporters not listed above that have a separate rate, 
the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-specific rate 
published for the most recent period; (3) for all PRC exporters of 
subject merchandise which have not been found to be entitled to a 
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the PRC-wide rate of 
118.04 percent; and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject 
merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit 
rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporters that supplied 
that non-PRC exporter. The deposit requirements, when imposed, shall 
remain in effect until further notice.

Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 
the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the 
relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this 
requirement could result in the Department's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties has occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of doubled antidumping duties.

Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 
to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the 
proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of 
APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO 
is a violation which is subject to sanction.
    We are issuing and publishing this administrative review and notice 
in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act.

    Dated: April 17, 2013.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013-09919 Filed 4-25-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P