Petition for Exemption From the Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard; Maserati North America Inc., 24304-24305 [2013-09685]
Download as PDF
24304
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 79 / Wednesday, April 24, 2013 / Notices
qualification file if he/she is selfemployed. The driver must also have a
copy of the certification when driving,
for presentation to a duly authorized
Federal, State, or local enforcement
official.
Conclusion
Based upon its evaluation of the 25
exemption applications, FMCSA
exempts Christopher R. Anderson (MN),
Brent T. Applebury (MO), Joseph A.
Auchterlonie (NH), Brett D. Bertagnolli
(IN), Brian T. Bofenkamp (WA), Scott A.
Carlson (PA), Craig L. Falck (WI), John
Fityere (NJ), Dana R. Griswold (VT),
Ronald A. Heaps (OH), Martin A. Houts
(IA), Michael T. Kraft (MN), Kris W.
Lindsay (KS), Edward M. Lucynski (NJ),
Wendell J. Matthews (MO), Patric L.
Patten (NH), Darryl G. Rockwell (TX),
John E. Ruth (IL), Greggory A. Smith
(MO), Dwight E. Sory (CO), James M.
Torklidson (WI), Terry R. Washa (NE),
Alfred J. Williams (VA), Scott B. Wood
(ND), and James L. Zore (IN) from the
ITDM requirement in 49 CFR
391.41(b)(3), subject to the conditions
listed under ‘‘Conditions and
Requirements’’ above.
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e)
and 31315 each exemption will be valid
for two years unless revoked earlier by
FMCSA. The exemption will be revoked
if the following occurs: (1) The person
fails to comply with the terms and
conditions of the 1/exemption; (2) the
exemption has resulted in a lower level
of safety than was maintained before it
was granted; or (3) continuation of the
exemption would not be consistent with
the goals and objectives of 49 U.S.C.
31136(e) and 31315. If the exemption is
still effective at the end of the 2-year
period, the person may apply to FMCSA
for a renewal under procedures in effect
at that time.
Issued on: April 12, 2013.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2013–09688 Filed 4–23–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
Petition for Exemption From the
Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard;
Maserati North America Inc.
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Grant of petition for exemption.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:05 Apr 23, 2013
Jkt 229001
This document grants in full
Maserati North America Inc.’s,
(Maserati) petition for an exemption of
the Quattroporte vehicle line in
accordance with 49 CFR Part 543,
Exemption from the Theft Prevention
Standard. This petition is granted
because the agency has determined that
the antitheft device to be placed on the
line as standard equipment is likely to
be as effective in reducing and deterring
motor vehicle theft as compliance with
the parts-marking requirements of the
Theft Prevention Standard (49 CFR Part
541).
DATES: The exemption granted by this
notice is effective beginning with the
2014 model year (MY).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Carlita Ballard, Office of International
Policy, Fuel Economy and Consumer
Programs, NHTSA, W43–439, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC
20590. Ms. Ballard’s phone number is
(202) 366–5222. Her fax number is (202)
493–2990.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a
petition dated March 11, 2013, Maserati
requested an exemption from the partsmarking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard (49 CFR Part 541)
for the MY 2014 Quattroporte vehicle
line. The petition requested an
exemption from parts-marking pursuant
to 49 CFR Part 543, Exemption from
Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard,
based on the installation of an antitheft
device as standard equipment for an
entire vehicle line.
Under § 543.5(a), a manufacturer may
petition NHTSA to grant an exemption
for one vehicle line per model year. In
its petition, Maserati provided a
detailed description and diagram of the
identity, design, and location of the
components of the antitheft device for
the Quattroporte vehicle line. Maserati
stated that all of its vehicles will be
equipped with a passive, Sentry Key
Immobilizer System (SKIS), a Vehicle
Alarm System (VTA) and a Keyless
Ignition System as standard equipment
beginning with the 2014 model year.
Key components of its SKIS antitheft
device will include an Engine Power
Control Module (ECM), Fuel Delivery,
Starter Motor Circuit, and a Shaft Lock
Module. Maserati’s keyless ignition
system will consist of a Key Fob with
Remote Keyless Entry (RKE)
Transmitter, RFHub and Keyless
Ignition Node (KIN). Maserati will
provide its VTA system as standard
equipment. The VTA will provide
perimeter protection by monitoring the
vehicle doors, ignition switch and deck
lid. The VTA alarm system includes an
ultrasonic sensor to defeat motion
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00155
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
within the vehicle and has the ability to
be armed without the intrusion sensor.
Maserati stated that if unauthorized
tampering with any of these protected
areas is detected, the system will
respond by pulsing the vehicle’s horn/
siren as an audible deterrent and
flashing certain exterior lamps as a
visual deterrent. Maserati’s submission
is considered a complete petition as
required by 49 CFR 543.7, in that it
meets the general requirements
contained in § 543.5 and the specific
content requirements of § 543.6.
Maserati stated that the immobilizer
device is automatically armed when the
ignition is changed from the run
position to the off position. Once
activated, only the use of a valid key can
disable immobilization and allow the
vehicle to run. Specifically, Maserati
stated that the device is disarmed by
performing an unlock actuation via the
RKE transmitter or by starting the
vehicle with a valid RFHub key.
Maserati stated that to start the vehicle,
the driver must press and hold the brake
pedal while pressing the START/STOP
button. The system takes over and
engages the starter causing the starter
motor to run and disengage
automatically when the engine is
running. Maserati stated that the RFHub
contains and controls the SKIS
preventing unauthorized use of the
vehicle by preventing the engine from
running more than 2 seconds unless a
valid FOBIK key is used to start the
engine. Maserati also stated that the
vehicle’s key fob with RKE transmitter,
RFHub and the KIN contains over
50,000 possible electronic key
combinations and allows the driver to
operate the ignition switch with the
push of a button as long as the RKE
transmitter is in the passenger
compartment.
In addressing the specific content
requirements of 543.6, Maserati
provided information on the reliability
and durability of its proposed device.
To ensure reliability and durability of
the device, Maserati conducted tests
based on its own specified standards.
Maserati provided a detailed list of the
tests conducted (i.e., temperature and
humidity cycling, high and low
temperature cycling, mechanical shock,
random vibration, thermal stress/shock
tests, material resistance tests, dry heat,
dust and fluid ingress tests). Maserati
also stated that the VTA, including the
immobilizer device and its related
components, must meet design and
durability requirements for full vehicle
useful life (10 years/120k miles).
Maserati stated that it believes that its
device is reliable and durable because it
E:\FR\FM\24APN1.SGM
24APN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 79 / Wednesday, April 24, 2013 / Notices
complied with specified requirements
for each test.
As an additional method of reliability
and security, Maserati stated that a shaft
lock module is also part of the SKIS.
This unit is designed to work in
conjunction with the RFHub module to
control a locking bolt that engages any
slot in the steering shaft to prevent shaft
rotation whenever there is not a valid
key present. The monitoring provisions
for the shaft lock module are designed
to resist unauthorized tampering. The
module cannot be removed from the
steering column while the lock bolt is in
the locked position. The shaft lock
module cannot be adjusted or repaired
and if faulty or damaged, it must be
replaced as an assembly.
Maserati stated that based on MY
2010 theft data published by NHTSA, its
vehicles which have had antitheft and
immobilizer systems installed have
experienced extremely low to zero theft
rates. Maserati also stated that because
it had previously been a small vehicle
manufacturer that produced and sold a
low volume of vehicle units, its vehicles
had been exempted from the partsmarking requirements. However,
Maserati informed the agency that its
immobilizer antitheft device has been
equipped on its vehicles as standard
equipment since MY 2007 and believes
that its advanced technology antitheft
devices are and will continue to be more
effective in deterring vehicle theft than
the parts-marking requirements. Theft
rate data reported in Federal Register
notices published by the agency show
that the theft rate for the Quattroporte
vehicle line, using an average of three
MYs’ data (2008–2010), is 0.6120, which
is significantly lower than the median
theft established by the agency. Maserati
believes these low theft rates
demonstrate the effectiveness of the
immobilizer device.
Based on the supporting evidence
submitted by Maserati on its device, the
agency believes that the antitheft device
for the Quattroporte vehicle line is
likely to be as effective in reducing and
deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts-marking
requirements of the Theft Prevention
Standard (49 CFR 541). The agency
concludes that the device will provide
the five types of performance listed in
§ 543.6(a)(3): promoting activation;
attracting attention to the efforts of an
unauthorized person to enter or move a
vehicle by means other than a key;
preventing defeat or circumvention of
the device by unauthorized persons;
preventing operation of the vehicle by
unauthorized entrants; and ensuring the
reliability and durability of the device.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:05 Apr 23, 2013
Jkt 229001
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 33106 and 49
CFR 543.7(b), the agency grants a
petition for exemption from the partsmarking requirements of Part 541 either
in whole or in part, if it determines that,
based upon substantial evidence, the
standard equipment antitheft device is
likely to be as effective in reducing and
deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts-marking
requirements of Part 541. The agency
finds that Maserati has provided
adequate reasons for its belief that the
antitheft device for the Maserati
Quattroporte vehicle line is likely to be
as effective in reducing and deterring
motor vehicle theft as compliance with
the parts-marking requirements of the
Theft Prevention Standard (49 CFR Part
541). This conclusion is based on the
information Maserati provided about its
device.
For the foregoing reasons, the agency
hereby grants in full Maserati’s petition
for exemption for the Maserati
Quattroporte vehicle line from the partsmarking requirements of 49 CFR Part
541. The agency notes that 49 CFR Part
541, Appendix A–1, identifies those
lines that are exempted from the Theft
Prevention Standard for a given model
year. 49 CFR Part 543.7(f) contains
publication requirements incident to the
disposition of all Part 543 petitions.
Advanced listing, including the release
of future product nameplates, the
beginning model year for which the
petition is granted and a general
description of the antitheft device is
necessary in order to notify law
enforcement agencies of new vehicle
lines exempted from the parts-marking
requirements of the Theft Prevention
Standard.
If Maserati decides not to use the
exemption for this line, it must formally
notify the agency. If such a decision is
made, the line must be fully marked
according to the requirements under 49
CFR Parts 541.5 and 541.6 (marking of
major component parts and replacement
parts).
NHTSA notes that if Maserati wishes
in the future to modify the device on
which this exemption is based, the
company may have to submit a petition
to modify the exemption. Part 543.7(d)
states that a Part 543 exemption applies
only to vehicles that belong to a line
exempted under this part and equipped
with the antitheft device on which the
line’s exemption is based. Further, Part
543.9(c)(2) provides for the submission
of petitions ‘‘to modify an exemption to
permit the use of an antitheft device
similar to but differing from the one
specified in that exemption.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00156
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24305
The agency wishes to minimize the
administrative burden that Part
543.9(c)(2) could place on exempted
vehicle manufacturers and itself. The
agency did not intend in drafting Part
543 to require the submission of a
modification petition for every change
to the components or design of an
antitheft device. The significance of
many such changes could be de
minimis. Therefore, NHTSA suggests
that if the manufacturer contemplates
making any changes, the effects of
which might be characterized as de
minimis, it should consult the agency
before preparing and submitting a
petition to modify.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 33106; delegation of
authority at 49 CFR 1.50.
Issued on: April 18, 2013.
Christopher J. Bonanti,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2013–09685 Filed 4–23–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Actions on Special Permit Applications
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), DOT.
AGENCY:
Notice of actions on Special
Permit Applications.
ACTION:
In accordance with the
procedures governing the application
for, and the processing of, special
permits from the Department of
Transportation’s Hazardous Material
Regulations (49 CFR Part 107, Subpart
B), notice is hereby given of the actions
on special permits applications in
(March to March 2013). The mode of
transportation involved are identified by
a number in the ‘‘Nature of
Application’’ portion of the table below
as follows: 1—Motor vehicle, 2—Rail
freight, 3—Cargo vessel, 4—Cargo
aircraft only, 5—Passenger-carrying
aircraft. Application numbers prefixed
by the letters EE represent applications
for Emergency Special Permits. It
should be noted that some of the
sections cited were those in effect at the
time certain special permits were
issued.
SUMMARY:
Issued in Washington, DC, on April 9,
2013.
Donald Burger,
Chief, Special Permits and Approvals Branch.
E:\FR\FM\24APN1.SGM
24APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 79 (Wednesday, April 24, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24304-24305]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-09685]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Petition for Exemption From the Vehicle Theft Prevention
Standard; Maserati North America Inc.
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document grants in full Maserati North America Inc.'s,
(Maserati) petition for an exemption of the Quattroporte vehicle line
in accordance with 49 CFR Part 543, Exemption from the Theft Prevention
Standard. This petition is granted because the agency has determined
that the antitheft device to be placed on the line as standard
equipment is likely to be as effective in reducing and deterring motor
vehicle theft as compliance with the parts-marking requirements of the
Theft Prevention Standard (49 CFR Part 541).
DATES: The exemption granted by this notice is effective beginning with
the 2014 model year (MY).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Carlita Ballard, Office of
International Policy, Fuel Economy and Consumer Programs, NHTSA, W43-
439, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. Ms. Ballard's
phone number is (202) 366-5222. Her fax number is (202) 493-2990.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a petition dated March 11, 2013, Maserati
requested an exemption from the parts-marking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard (49 CFR Part 541) for the MY 2014 Quattroporte
vehicle line. The petition requested an exemption from parts-marking
pursuant to 49 CFR Part 543, Exemption from Vehicle Theft Prevention
Standard, based on the installation of an antitheft device as standard
equipment for an entire vehicle line.
Under Sec. 543.5(a), a manufacturer may petition NHTSA to grant an
exemption for one vehicle line per model year. In its petition,
Maserati provided a detailed description and diagram of the identity,
design, and location of the components of the antitheft device for the
Quattroporte vehicle line. Maserati stated that all of its vehicles
will be equipped with a passive, Sentry Key Immobilizer System (SKIS),
a Vehicle Alarm System (VTA) and a Keyless Ignition System as standard
equipment beginning with the 2014 model year. Key components of its
SKIS antitheft device will include an Engine Power Control Module
(ECM), Fuel Delivery, Starter Motor Circuit, and a Shaft Lock Module.
Maserati's keyless ignition system will consist of a Key Fob with
Remote Keyless Entry (RKE) Transmitter, RFHub and Keyless Ignition Node
(KIN). Maserati will provide its VTA system as standard equipment. The
VTA will provide perimeter protection by monitoring the vehicle doors,
ignition switch and deck lid. The VTA alarm system includes an
ultrasonic sensor to defeat motion within the vehicle and has the
ability to be armed without the intrusion sensor. Maserati stated that
if unauthorized tampering with any of these protected areas is
detected, the system will respond by pulsing the vehicle's horn/siren
as an audible deterrent and flashing certain exterior lamps as a visual
deterrent. Maserati's submission is considered a complete petition as
required by 49 CFR 543.7, in that it meets the general requirements
contained in Sec. 543.5 and the specific content requirements of Sec.
543.6.
Maserati stated that the immobilizer device is automatically armed
when the ignition is changed from the run position to the off position.
Once activated, only the use of a valid key can disable immobilization
and allow the vehicle to run. Specifically, Maserati stated that the
device is disarmed by performing an unlock actuation via the RKE
transmitter or by starting the vehicle with a valid RFHub key. Maserati
stated that to start the vehicle, the driver must press and hold the
brake pedal while pressing the START/STOP button. The system takes over
and engages the starter causing the starter motor to run and disengage
automatically when the engine is running. Maserati stated that the
RFHub contains and controls the SKIS preventing unauthorized use of the
vehicle by preventing the engine from running more than 2 seconds
unless a valid FOBIK key is used to start the engine. Maserati also
stated that the vehicle's key fob with RKE transmitter, RFHub and the
KIN contains over 50,000 possible electronic key combinations and
allows the driver to operate the ignition switch with the push of a
button as long as the RKE transmitter is in the passenger compartment.
In addressing the specific content requirements of 543.6, Maserati
provided information on the reliability and durability of its proposed
device. To ensure reliability and durability of the device, Maserati
conducted tests based on its own specified standards. Maserati provided
a detailed list of the tests conducted (i.e., temperature and humidity
cycling, high and low temperature cycling, mechanical shock, random
vibration, thermal stress/shock tests, material resistance tests, dry
heat, dust and fluid ingress tests). Maserati also stated that the VTA,
including the immobilizer device and its related components, must meet
design and durability requirements for full vehicle useful life (10
years/120k miles). Maserati stated that it believes that its device is
reliable and durable because it
[[Page 24305]]
complied with specified requirements for each test.
As an additional method of reliability and security, Maserati
stated that a shaft lock module is also part of the SKIS. This unit is
designed to work in conjunction with the RFHub module to control a
locking bolt that engages any slot in the steering shaft to prevent
shaft rotation whenever there is not a valid key present. The
monitoring provisions for the shaft lock module are designed to resist
unauthorized tampering. The module cannot be removed from the steering
column while the lock bolt is in the locked position. The shaft lock
module cannot be adjusted or repaired and if faulty or damaged, it must
be replaced as an assembly.
Maserati stated that based on MY 2010 theft data published by
NHTSA, its vehicles which have had antitheft and immobilizer systems
installed have experienced extremely low to zero theft rates. Maserati
also stated that because it had previously been a small vehicle
manufacturer that produced and sold a low volume of vehicle units, its
vehicles had been exempted from the parts-marking requirements.
However, Maserati informed the agency that its immobilizer antitheft
device has been equipped on its vehicles as standard equipment since MY
2007 and believes that its advanced technology antitheft devices are
and will continue to be more effective in deterring vehicle theft than
the parts-marking requirements. Theft rate data reported in Federal
Register notices published by the agency show that the theft rate for
the Quattroporte vehicle line, using an average of three MYs' data
(2008-2010), is 0.6120, which is significantly lower than the median
theft established by the agency. Maserati believes these low theft
rates demonstrate the effectiveness of the immobilizer device.
Based on the supporting evidence submitted by Maserati on its
device, the agency believes that the antitheft device for the
Quattroporte vehicle line is likely to be as effective in reducing and
deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance with the parts-marking
requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard (49 CFR 541). The agency
concludes that the device will provide the five types of performance
listed in Sec. 543.6(a)(3): promoting activation; attracting attention
to the efforts of an unauthorized person to enter or move a vehicle by
means other than a key; preventing defeat or circumvention of the
device by unauthorized persons; preventing operation of the vehicle by
unauthorized entrants; and ensuring the reliability and durability of
the device.
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 33106 and 49 CFR 543.7(b), the agency grants
a petition for exemption from the parts-marking requirements of Part
541 either in whole or in part, if it determines that, based upon
substantial evidence, the standard equipment antitheft device is likely
to be as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts-marking requirements of Part 541. The agency
finds that Maserati has provided adequate reasons for its belief that
the antitheft device for the Maserati Quattroporte vehicle line is
likely to be as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft
as compliance with the parts-marking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard (49 CFR Part 541). This conclusion is based on the
information Maserati provided about its device.
For the foregoing reasons, the agency hereby grants in full
Maserati's petition for exemption for the Maserati Quattroporte vehicle
line from the parts-marking requirements of 49 CFR Part 541. The agency
notes that 49 CFR Part 541, Appendix A-1, identifies those lines that
are exempted from the Theft Prevention Standard for a given model year.
49 CFR Part 543.7(f) contains publication requirements incident to the
disposition of all Part 543 petitions. Advanced listing, including the
release of future product nameplates, the beginning model year for
which the petition is granted and a general description of the
antitheft device is necessary in order to notify law enforcement
agencies of new vehicle lines exempted from the parts-marking
requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard.
If Maserati decides not to use the exemption for this line, it must
formally notify the agency. If such a decision is made, the line must
be fully marked according to the requirements under 49 CFR Parts 541.5
and 541.6 (marking of major component parts and replacement parts).
NHTSA notes that if Maserati wishes in the future to modify the
device on which this exemption is based, the company may have to submit
a petition to modify the exemption. Part 543.7(d) states that a Part
543 exemption applies only to vehicles that belong to a line exempted
under this part and equipped with the antitheft device on which the
line's exemption is based. Further, Part 543.9(c)(2) provides for the
submission of petitions ``to modify an exemption to permit the use of
an antitheft device similar to but differing from the one specified in
that exemption.''
The agency wishes to minimize the administrative burden that Part
543.9(c)(2) could place on exempted vehicle manufacturers and itself.
The agency did not intend in drafting Part 543 to require the
submission of a modification petition for every change to the
components or design of an antitheft device. The significance of many
such changes could be de minimis. Therefore, NHTSA suggests that if the
manufacturer contemplates making any changes, the effects of which
might be characterized as de minimis, it should consult the agency
before preparing and submitting a petition to modify.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 33106; delegation of authority at 49 CFR
1.50.
Issued on: April 18, 2013.
Christopher J. Bonanti,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2013-09685 Filed 4-23-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P