Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Exchange, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Schedule of Fees To Increase Certain Complex Order Rebates, 24269-24271 [2013-09655]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 79 / Wednesday, April 24, 2013 / Notices
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–ISE–
2013–33, and should be submitted on or
before May 15, 2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.18
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–09654 Filed 4–23–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–69395; File No. SR–ISE–
2013–31]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
International Securities Exchange,
LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of Proposed Rule
Change To Amend the Schedule of
Fees To Increase Certain Complex
Order Rebates
April 18, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on April 10,
2013, the International Securities
Exchange, LLC (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or the
‘‘ISE’’) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission the proposed
rule change, as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which items have been
prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The ISE proposes to amend its
Schedule of Fees to increase certain
complex order rebates. The text of the
proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange’s Web site (https://
www.ise.com), at the principal office of
18 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
18:05 Apr 23, 2013
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The self-regulatory organization has
prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B and C below, of the most
significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of this proposed rule
change is to increase the rebate levels
for Priority Customer complex orders
that trade with quotes and orders on the
regular orderbook in all symbols traded
on the Exchange. The rebates discussed
below apply to both standard options
and mini options traded on the
Exchange. The Exchange’s Schedule of
Fees has separate tables for fees and
rebates applicable to standard options
and mini options. The Exchange notes
that while the discussion below notes
the rebates for standard options, the
rebates for mini options, which are not
discussed below, are and shall continue
to be 1/10th of the rebates for standard
options.3
In order to enhance the Exchange’s
competitive position and to incentivize
Members to increase the amount of
Priority Customer complex orders that
they send to the Exchange, the Exchange
provides volume-based tiered rebates for
Priority Customer complex orders that
trade with quotes and orders on the
regular order book in all symbols traded
on the Exchange. Specifically, the
Exchange currently provides a base
rebate of $0.06 per contract, per leg, for
Priority Customer complex orders in all
symbols traded on the Exchange
(excluding SPY) when these orders
trade against quotes or orders in the
regular orderbook. The current average
daily volume (ADV) threshold for the
base tier is 0–39,999 Priority Customer
complex contracts and the base rebate of
$0.06 per contract, per leg, applies to
this tier. The Exchange is not proposing
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 69270
(April 2, 2013), 78 FR 20988 (April 8, 2013) (SR–
ISE–2013–28).
1 15
VerDate Mar<15>2010
the Exchange, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00120
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24269
any change to the rebate for this tier.
The current ADV threshold for the
second tier is 40,000–74,999 Priority
Customer complex contracts. The rebate
amount for this tier is currently $0.08
per contract, per leg. The Exchange
proposes to increase the rebate for this
tier to $0.12 per contract, per leg. The
current ADV threshold for the third tier
is 75,000–124,999 Priority Customer
complex contracts. The rebate amount
for this tier is currently $0.09 per
contract, per leg. The Exchange
proposes to increase the rebate for this
tier to $0.13 per contract, per leg. The
current ADV threshold for the fourth
tier is 125,000–224,999 Priority
Customer complex contracts. The rebate
amount for this tier is currently $0.10
per contract, per leg. The Exchange
proposes to increase the rebate for this
tier to $0.17 per contract, per leg.
Finally, the current ADV threshold for
the fifth tier is 225,000 or more Priority
Customer complex contracts. The rebate
amount for this tier is currently $0.11
per contract, per leg. The Exchange
proposes to increase the rebate for this
tier to $0.18 per contract, per leg. The
highest rebate amount achieved by the
Member for the current calendar month
applies retroactively to all Priority
Customer complex orders that trade
against quotes or orders in the regular
orderbook during such calendar month.
For SPY, the Exchange currently
provides a base rebate of $0.07 per
contract, per leg, for Priority Customer
complex orders traded on the Exchange
when these orders trade against quotes
or orders in the regular orderbook. The
current ADV threshold for the base tier
is 0–39,999 Priority Customer complex
contracts and the base rebate of $0.07
per contract, per leg, applies to this tier.
The Exchange is not proposing any
change to the rebate for this tier. The
current ADV threshold for the second
tier is 40,000–74,999 Priority Customer
complex contracts. The rebate amount
for this tier is currently $0.09 per
contract, per leg. The Exchange
proposes to increase the rebate for this
tier to $0.13 per contract, per leg. The
current ADV threshold for the third tier
is 75,000–124,999 Priority Customer
complex contracts. The rebate amount
for this tier is currently $0.10 per
contract, per leg. The Exchange
proposes to increase the rebate for this
tier to $0.14 per contract, per leg. The
current ADV threshold for the fourth
tier is 125,000–224,999 Priority
Customer complex contracts. The rebate
amount for this tier is currently $0.11
per contract, per leg. The Exchange
proposes to increase the rebate for this
tier to $0.18 per contract, per leg.
E:\FR\FM\24APN1.SGM
24APN1
24270
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 79 / Wednesday, April 24, 2013 / Notices
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Finally, the current ADV threshold for
the fifth tier is 225,000 or more Priority
Customer complex contracts. The rebate
amount for this tier is currently $0.12
per contract, per leg. The Exchange
proposes to increase the rebate for this
tier to $0.19 per contract, per leg. The
highest rebate amount achieved by the
Member for the current calendar month
applies retroactively to all Priority
Customer complex orders that trade
against quotes or orders in the regular
orderbook during such calendar month.
The Exchange believes this proposed
change will enhance the Exchange’s
competitive position and incentivize
Members to increase the amount of
Priority Customer complex orders that
they send to the Exchange.
The Exchange is not proposing any
other changes in this filing.
Since the rate changes to the Schedule
of Fees pursuant to this proposal will be
effective upon filing, for the transactions
occurring in April 2013 prior to the
effective date of this filing members will
be assessed the rates in effect
immediately prior to those proposed by
this filing. For transactions occurring in
April 2013 on and after the effective
date of this filing, members will be
assessed the rates proposed by this
filing.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal to amend its Schedule of Fees
is consistent with Section 6(b) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934
(the ‘‘Act’’) 4 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act 5
in particular, in that it is an equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees and
other charges among Exchange members
and other persons using its facilities.
The impact of the proposal upon the net
fees paid by a particular market
participant will depend on a number of
variables, most important of which will
be its propensity to add or remove
liquidity in options overlying the
symbols that are subject to the
Exchange’s maker/taker fees and
rebates.
The Exchange has determined to
charge fees and provide rebates for
regular orders in mini options at a rate
that is 1/10th the rate of fees and rebates
the Exchange currently provides for
trading in standard options. The
Exchange believes it is reasonable and
equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory to assess lower fees and
rebates to provide market participants
an incentive to trade mini options on
the Exchange. The Exchange believes
4 15
5 15
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:05 Apr 23, 2013
Jkt 229001
the proposed fees and rebates are
reasonable and equitable in light of the
fact that mini options have a smaller
exercise and assignment value,
specifically 1/10th that of a standard
option contract, and, as such, levying
fees that are 1/10th of what market
participants pay today.
The Exchange believes that it is
reasonable and equitable to provide
rebates for Priority Customer complex
orders when these orders trade against
quotes or orders in the regular
orderbook because paying a rebate
would continue to attract additional
order flow to the Exchange and create
liquidity in the symbols that are subject
to the rebate, which the Exchange
believes ultimately will benefit all
market participants who trade on ISE.
The Exchange has already established a
volume-based incentive program, and is
now merely proposing to increase the
rebate amounts in that program. The
Exchange believes that the proposed
rebates are competitive with rebates
provided by other exchanges and are
therefore reasonable and equitably
allocated to those members that direct
orders to the Exchange rather than to a
competing exchange. The Exchange
believes paying these rebates would also
attract additional order flow to the
Exchange.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed fee change will generally
allow the Exchange and its Members to
better compete for order flow and thus
enhance competition. Specifically, the
Exchange believes that its proposal,
which increases rebate amounts, so
Members can qualify for larger rebates,
is reasonable as it will encourage
Members to increase the amount of
Priority Customer complex orders that
they send to the Exchange instead of
sending this order flow to a competing
exchange. The Exchange believes that
with the proposed rebate levels,
Members are now likely to qualify for
larger rebates.
The complex order pricing employed
by the Exchange has proven to be an
effective pricing mechanism and
attractive to Exchange participants and
their customers. The Exchange believes
that this proposed rule change will
continue to attract additional complex
order business in the symbols that are
subject to this proposed rule change.
Moreover, the Exchange believes that
the proposed fees are fair, equitable and
not unfairly discriminatory because the
proposed fees are consistent with price
differentiation that exists today at other
options exchanges. Additionally, the
Exchange believes it remains an
attractive venue for market participants
to direct their order flow in the symbols
PO 00000
Frm 00121
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
that are subject to this proposed rule
change as its fees are competitive with
those charged by other exchanges for
similar trading strategies. The Exchange
operates in a highly competitive market
in which market participants can
readily direct order flow to another
exchange if they deem fee levels at a
particular exchange to be excessive. For
the reasons noted above, the Exchange
believes that the proposed fees are fair,
equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
ISE believes that the proposed rule
change, which will maintain fees that
are competitive and are within the range
of fees charged by other exchanges for
similar orders, will not impose any
burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. Indeed, the
Exchange believes that the proposed
changes will promote competition, as
they are designed to allow ISE to better
compete for order flow and improve the
Exchange’s competitive position.
The Exchange does not believe
providing increased rebates to market
participants is an undue burden on
competition as the Exchange already
provides these rebates and is now
merely increasing the level of these
rebates in response to increased rebates
provided by other markets to attract
Priority Customer order flow. Further,
the Exchange believes the adjustment of
the rebate for Priority Customer orders
that trade with quotes and orders on the
regular orderbook in all symbols
reduces the burden on competition by
providing additional incentives for
Priority Customer orders traded on the
Exchange. This incents competition
because non-Priority Customers wish to
have Priority Customer orders attracted
to the Exchange by having attractive
rebates.
Finally, the Exchange notes that it
operates in a highly competitive market
in which market participants can
readily direct their order flow to
competing venues. In such an
environment, the Exchange must
continually review, and consider
adjusting, its fees and rebates to remain
competitive with other exchanges. For
the reasons described above, the
Exchange believes that the proposed fee
change reflects this competitive
environment.
E:\FR\FM\24APN1.SGM
24APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 79 / Wednesday, April 24, 2013 / Notices
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange has not solicited, and
does not intend to solicit, comments on
this proposed rule change. The
Exchange has not received any
unsolicited written comments from
members or other interested parties.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act 6 and
subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4
thereunder,7 because it establishes a
due, fee, or other charge imposed by
ISE.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–ISE–2013–31 on the subject
line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–ISE–2013–31. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–ISE–
2013–31, and should be submitted on or
before May 15, 2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.8
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–09655 Filed 4–23–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–69393; File No. SR–ISE–
2013–32]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
International Securities Exchange,
LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of Proposed Rule
Change To Amend the Market Maker
Plus Rebate Program
April 18, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on April 10,
2013, the International Securities
Exchange, LLC (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or the
‘‘ISE’’) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission the proposed
rule change, as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which items have been
prepared by the self-regulatory
7 17
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:05 Apr 23, 2013
Jkt 229001
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The ISE proposes to amend the
Market Maker Plus rebate program. The
text of the proposed rule change is
available on the Exchange’s Web site
(https://www.ise.com), at the principal
office of the Exchange, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The self-regulatory organization has
prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B and C below, of the most
significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange currently assesses per
contract transaction fees and provides
rebates to market participants that add
or remove liquidity from the Exchange
(‘‘maker/taker fees and rebates’’) in all
symbols that are in the Penny Pilot
program (the ‘‘Select Symbols’’). The fee
change discussed below applies to both
standard options and mini options
traded on the Exchange. The Exchange’s
Schedule of Fees has separate tables for
fees and rebates applicable to standard
options and mini options. The Exchange
notes that while the discussion below
relates to fees and rebates for standard
options, the fees and rebates for mini
options, which are not discussed below,
are and shall continue to be 1/10th of
the fees and rebates for standard
options.3
The Exchange’s maker/taker fees and
rebates apply to the following categories
of market participants: (i) Market
Maker; 4 (ii) Market Maker Plus; (iii)
SR–ISE–2013–28 (not yet published) [sic].
term ‘‘Market Makers’’ refers to
‘‘Competitive Market Makers’’ and ‘‘Primary Market
Makers’’ collectively. See ISE Rule 100(a)(25).
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
organization. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
3 See
8 17
6 15
PO 00000
Frm 00122
Fmt 4703
24271
4 The
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\24APN1.SGM
24APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 79 (Wednesday, April 24, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24269-24271]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-09655]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-69395; File No. SR-ISE-2013-31]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Exchange,
LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule
Change To Amend the Schedule of Fees To Increase Certain Complex Order
Rebates
April 18, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on April 10, 2013, the International Securities Exchange, LLC (the
``Exchange'' or the ``ISE'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission the proposed rule change, as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The ISE proposes to amend its Schedule of Fees to increase certain
complex order rebates. The text of the proposed rule change is
available on the Exchange's Web site (https://www.ise.com), at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization
has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B and C below, of the
most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of this proposed rule change is to increase the rebate
levels for Priority Customer complex orders that trade with quotes and
orders on the regular orderbook in all symbols traded on the Exchange.
The rebates discussed below apply to both standard options and mini
options traded on the Exchange. The Exchange's Schedule of Fees has
separate tables for fees and rebates applicable to standard options and
mini options. The Exchange notes that while the discussion below notes
the rebates for standard options, the rebates for mini options, which
are not discussed below, are and shall continue to be 1/10th of the
rebates for standard options.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 69270 (April 2,
2013), 78 FR 20988 (April 8, 2013) (SR-ISE-2013-28).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In order to enhance the Exchange's competitive position and to
incentivize Members to increase the amount of Priority Customer complex
orders that they send to the Exchange, the Exchange provides volume-
based tiered rebates for Priority Customer complex orders that trade
with quotes and orders on the regular order book in all symbols traded
on the Exchange. Specifically, the Exchange currently provides a base
rebate of $0.06 per contract, per leg, for Priority Customer complex
orders in all symbols traded on the Exchange (excluding SPY) when these
orders trade against quotes or orders in the regular orderbook. The
current average daily volume (ADV) threshold for the base tier is 0-
39,999 Priority Customer complex contracts and the base rebate of $0.06
per contract, per leg, applies to this tier. The Exchange is not
proposing any change to the rebate for this tier. The current ADV
threshold for the second tier is 40,000-74,999 Priority Customer
complex contracts. The rebate amount for this tier is currently $0.08
per contract, per leg. The Exchange proposes to increase the rebate for
this tier to $0.12 per contract, per leg. The current ADV threshold for
the third tier is 75,000-124,999 Priority Customer complex contracts.
The rebate amount for this tier is currently $0.09 per contract, per
leg. The Exchange proposes to increase the rebate for this tier to
$0.13 per contract, per leg. The current ADV threshold for the fourth
tier is 125,000-224,999 Priority Customer complex contracts. The rebate
amount for this tier is currently $0.10 per contract, per leg. The
Exchange proposes to increase the rebate for this tier to $0.17 per
contract, per leg. Finally, the current ADV threshold for the fifth
tier is 225,000 or more Priority Customer complex contracts. The rebate
amount for this tier is currently $0.11 per contract, per leg. The
Exchange proposes to increase the rebate for this tier to $0.18 per
contract, per leg. The highest rebate amount achieved by the Member for
the current calendar month applies retroactively to all Priority
Customer complex orders that trade against quotes or orders in the
regular orderbook during such calendar month.
For SPY, the Exchange currently provides a base rebate of $0.07 per
contract, per leg, for Priority Customer complex orders traded on the
Exchange when these orders trade against quotes or orders in the
regular orderbook. The current ADV threshold for the base tier is 0-
39,999 Priority Customer complex contracts and the base rebate of $0.07
per contract, per leg, applies to this tier. The Exchange is not
proposing any change to the rebate for this tier. The current ADV
threshold for the second tier is 40,000-74,999 Priority Customer
complex contracts. The rebate amount for this tier is currently $0.09
per contract, per leg. The Exchange proposes to increase the rebate for
this tier to $0.13 per contract, per leg. The current ADV threshold for
the third tier is 75,000-124,999 Priority Customer complex contracts.
The rebate amount for this tier is currently $0.10 per contract, per
leg. The Exchange proposes to increase the rebate for this tier to
$0.14 per contract, per leg. The current ADV threshold for the fourth
tier is 125,000-224,999 Priority Customer complex contracts. The rebate
amount for this tier is currently $0.11 per contract, per leg. The
Exchange proposes to increase the rebate for this tier to $0.18 per
contract, per leg.
[[Page 24270]]
Finally, the current ADV threshold for the fifth tier is 225,000 or
more Priority Customer complex contracts. The rebate amount for this
tier is currently $0.12 per contract, per leg. The Exchange proposes to
increase the rebate for this tier to $0.19 per contract, per leg. The
highest rebate amount achieved by the Member for the current calendar
month applies retroactively to all Priority Customer complex orders
that trade against quotes or orders in the regular orderbook during
such calendar month.
The Exchange believes this proposed change will enhance the
Exchange's competitive position and incentivize Members to increase the
amount of Priority Customer complex orders that they send to the
Exchange.
The Exchange is not proposing any other changes in this filing.
Since the rate changes to the Schedule of Fees pursuant to this
proposal will be effective upon filing, for the transactions occurring
in April 2013 prior to the effective date of this filing members will
be assessed the rates in effect immediately prior to those proposed by
this filing. For transactions occurring in April 2013 on and after the
effective date of this filing, members will be assessed the rates
proposed by this filing.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal to amend its Schedule of
Fees is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act
of 1934 (the ``Act'') \4\ in general, and furthers the objectives of
Section 6(b)(4) of the Act \5\ in particular, in that it is an
equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among
Exchange members and other persons using its facilities. The impact of
the proposal upon the net fees paid by a particular market participant
will depend on a number of variables, most important of which will be
its propensity to add or remove liquidity in options overlying the
symbols that are subject to the Exchange's maker/taker fees and
rebates.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange has determined to charge fees and provide rebates for
regular orders in mini options at a rate that is 1/10th the rate of
fees and rebates the Exchange currently provides for trading in
standard options. The Exchange believes it is reasonable and equitable
and not unfairly discriminatory to assess lower fees and rebates to
provide market participants an incentive to trade mini options on the
Exchange. The Exchange believes the proposed fees and rebates are
reasonable and equitable in light of the fact that mini options have a
smaller exercise and assignment value, specifically 1/10th that of a
standard option contract, and, as such, levying fees that are 1/10th of
what market participants pay today.
The Exchange believes that it is reasonable and equitable to
provide rebates for Priority Customer complex orders when these orders
trade against quotes or orders in the regular orderbook because paying
a rebate would continue to attract additional order flow to the
Exchange and create liquidity in the symbols that are subject to the
rebate, which the Exchange believes ultimately will benefit all market
participants who trade on ISE. The Exchange has already established a
volume-based incentive program, and is now merely proposing to increase
the rebate amounts in that program. The Exchange believes that the
proposed rebates are competitive with rebates provided by other
exchanges and are therefore reasonable and equitably allocated to those
members that direct orders to the Exchange rather than to a competing
exchange. The Exchange believes paying these rebates would also attract
additional order flow to the Exchange.
The Exchange believes that the proposed fee change will generally
allow the Exchange and its Members to better compete for order flow and
thus enhance competition. Specifically, the Exchange believes that its
proposal, which increases rebate amounts, so Members can qualify for
larger rebates, is reasonable as it will encourage Members to increase
the amount of Priority Customer complex orders that they send to the
Exchange instead of sending this order flow to a competing exchange.
The Exchange believes that with the proposed rebate levels, Members are
now likely to qualify for larger rebates.
The complex order pricing employed by the Exchange has proven to be
an effective pricing mechanism and attractive to Exchange participants
and their customers. The Exchange believes that this proposed rule
change will continue to attract additional complex order business in
the symbols that are subject to this proposed rule change.
Moreover, the Exchange believes that the proposed fees are fair,
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because the proposed fees are
consistent with price differentiation that exists today at other
options exchanges. Additionally, the Exchange believes it remains an
attractive venue for market participants to direct their order flow in
the symbols that are subject to this proposed rule change as its fees
are competitive with those charged by other exchanges for similar
trading strategies. The Exchange operates in a highly competitive
market in which market participants can readily direct order flow to
another exchange if they deem fee levels at a particular exchange to be
excessive. For the reasons noted above, the Exchange believes that the
proposed fees are fair, equitable and not unfairly discriminatory.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
ISE believes that the proposed rule change, which will maintain
fees that are competitive and are within the range of fees charged by
other exchanges for similar orders, will not impose any burden on
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. Indeed, the Exchange believes that the proposed
changes will promote competition, as they are designed to allow ISE to
better compete for order flow and improve the Exchange's competitive
position.
The Exchange does not believe providing increased rebates to market
participants is an undue burden on competition as the Exchange already
provides these rebates and is now merely increasing the level of these
rebates in response to increased rebates provided by other markets to
attract Priority Customer order flow. Further, the Exchange believes
the adjustment of the rebate for Priority Customer orders that trade
with quotes and orders on the regular orderbook in all symbols reduces
the burden on competition by providing additional incentives for
Priority Customer orders traded on the Exchange. This incents
competition because non-Priority Customers wish to have Priority
Customer orders attracted to the Exchange by having attractive rebates.
Finally, the Exchange notes that it operates in a highly
competitive market in which market participants can readily direct
their order flow to competing venues. In such an environment, the
Exchange must continually review, and consider adjusting, its fees and
rebates to remain competitive with other exchanges. For the reasons
described above, the Exchange believes that the proposed fee change
reflects this competitive environment.
[[Page 24271]]
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit,
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received
any unsolicited written comments from members or other interested
parties.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \6\ and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b-4
thereunder,\7\ because it establishes a due, fee, or other charge
imposed by ISE.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
\7\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-ISE-2013-31 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2013-31. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2013-31, and should be
submitted on or before May 15, 2013.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\8\
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-09655 Filed 4-23-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P